Палаш колющие-рубишее оружие , ага тот к то с булавкой тот и главный.

The combat record of the Winged Hussars stands for itself. In 1577 a massive charge of this ultra-heavy cavalry unit smashed a German army from Danzig, blitzing into the teeth of a 12,000 man force and crushing them until all that remained was a well-trampled patch of red where the enemy army once used to be. Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth losses in the battle totaled about 88 men, and most of those clowns weren't even Hussars. In 1601, a thousand Hussars defeated a Swedish cavalry force four times that size. At the Battle of Kircholm four years later, the Hussars (whose commanders' completely badass motto was "Kill First, Calculate Later"), sent 1,000 lancers in a charge against 11,000 Swedish infantrymen and cannons for some reason, and incredibly, despite the ridiculous idiocy of sending your elite troops on such an impossible mission, the friggin' Hussars jammed their poles (OMG AWESOME PUN FTW) into anything they could find and not only emerged victorious, but utterly slaughtered their opponents army, hacking the broken infantry units into giblets as they fled the field. Amazingly, that wasn't even the most impressive shit this mobile last stand accomplished in its proud heritage as the Commonwealth's premier exporter of busted-up faces. At the Battle of Klushino in 1610, the Hussars were outnumbered ten to one, and still somehow came out on top, utterly annihilating an army of 40,000 Swedes and Russians with just 4,000 lancers. What might be even more awesome then the Winged Hussars' much-deserved reputation as seemingly-invincible shit-wreckers is their completely over-the-top awesome battle gear. These guys went with the heaviest armor they could find, decking themselves out in fully-articulated plate mail at a time when most European armies were switching away from breastplates and over to firearms, but these ferocious warriors didn't even give a crap about rushing at state-of-the-art muskets with hand-to-hand combat weapons. Their primary implement of facial demolition was a lightweight (yet still completely insane) 19-foot lance capable of outreaching even the most well-endowed infantry spear hedges, and after they splintered that up the asses of their foes, the Hussars could fall back on pistols, a dagger, and one of two different types of swords. Why they needed two different swords is beyond the scope of my knowledge, but I'm pretty sure that I support

Видео снято 2 недели назад, а по ощущению 3-5 лет назад. Попробуйте снимать не 1 цельный кадром

@GoldenBatGames

Жыл бұрын

Нет у меня ни возможности монтировать, ни желания этого делать.

@salolker3582

Жыл бұрын

@@GoldenBatGames а зачем тогда снимать, если уж хотите нам показать эти фигуры, то качественной съёмки хотелось бы!

@GoldenBatGames

Жыл бұрын

@@salolker3582 Я снимаю потому что мне это нравится. Если Вам не нравится качество, то просто больше не смотрите.

Мне не понять, как такие крылья могли помочь в бою. По законам физики они работают как парус. И если сильный боковой ветер?😄 Ну, если только для устрашения и дезориентации врага...

@GoldenBatGames

Жыл бұрын

Как пишут в википедии - "Среди исследователей продолжаются споры о цели ношения крыльев, однако большинство считает, что крылья были скорее парадным, чем полезным боевым атрибутом"

@truggvi5346

Жыл бұрын

Они страшно звучат когда их развивает ветер.) А ещё они высокие визуально росту добавляет ну и держатель может спину прикрыть. Но да споры об этом досих пор.

@kazimierzlenarczyk9067

Жыл бұрын

Various proposals have been put forward for the reasons for their use; from them making a rushing sound in the charge, hardly likely above the general din of battle, or to stop tartar lassoes carting nobles off for a ransom. Most probably, combined with the wild animal skins and lance pennons, their effect was psychological. By increasing the size and magnificence of the horse and rider they made them look more fearsome.

@kazimierzlenarczyk9067

Жыл бұрын

The combat record of the Winged Hussars stands for itself. In 1577 a massive charge of this ultra-heavy cavalry unit smashed a German army from Danzig, blitzing into the teeth of a 12,000 man force and crushing them until all that remained was a well-trampled patch of red where the enemy army once used to be. Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth losses in the battle totaled about 88 men, and most of those clowns weren't even Hussars. In 1601, a thousand Hussars defeated a Swedish cavalry force four times that size. At the Battle of Kircholm four years later, the Hussars (whose commanders' completely badass motto was "Kill First, Calculate Later"), sent 1,000 lancers in a charge against 11,000 Swedish infantrymen and cannons for some reason, and incredibly, despite the ridiculous idiocy of sending your elite troops on such an impossible mission, the friggin' Hussars jammed their poles (OMG AWESOME PUN FTW) into anything they could find and not only emerged victorious, but utterly slaughtered their opponents army, hacking the broken infantry units into giblets as they fled the field. Amazingly, that wasn't even the most impressive shit this mobile last stand accomplished in its proud heritage as the Commonwealth's premier exporter of busted-up faces. At the Battle of Klushino in 1610, the Hussars were outnumbered ten to one, and still somehow came out on top, utterly annihilating an army of 40,000 Swedes and Russians with just 4,000 lancers. What might be even more awesome then the Winged Hussars' much-deserved reputation as seemingly-invincible shit-wreckers is their completely over-the-top awesome battle gear. These guys went with the heaviest armor they could find, decking themselves out in fully-articulated plate mail at a time when most European armies were switching away from breastplates and over to firearms, but these ferocious warriors didn't even give a crap about rushing at state-of-the-art muskets with hand-to-hand combat weapons. Their primary implement of facial demolition was a lightweight (yet still completely insane) 19-foot lance capable of outreaching even the most well-endowed infantry spear hedges, and after they splintered that up the asses of their foes, the Hussars could fall back on pistols, a dagger, and one of two different types of swords. Why they needed two different swords is beyond the scope of my knowledge, but I'm pretty sure that I support

@user-kc4gy3ro2g

Жыл бұрын

@@kazimierzlenarczyk9067 один длинный прямой меч был нужен для атаки пехоты. Порой, чтоб приберечь пики, гусары шеренгами атаковали вражескую пехоту, нанося ей удары длинными палашами - до 1,5 м. Также ими можно было добивать упавших раненых врагов. А более короткие сабли использовались гусарами для боя с вражеской конницей. Ими можно было фехтовать и они были удобнее в условиях, когда гусары смешались с противником, и битва разваливалась на отдельные поединки.