The wife played the jury. She lied on purpose to messed with their heads. That’s why the creepy husband and wife got off.

@cynn3367

3 жыл бұрын

Read Agatha Christie's " Witness for the Prosecution". A lesson on how to manipulate the truth and the jury. As soon as she started her crying testimony I thought of that story.

@widowrumstrypze9705

3 жыл бұрын

@@cynn3367 Agatha Christie was a GENIUS!! Thank you for writing that! Seeing your comment has made me determined to set up a beach chair in my livung room, don a silk caftan, sunglasses, big hat, and sip a champagne cocktail whilst watching, "Evil Under The Sun"!!! 🥂😎🥂

@marycanary

3 жыл бұрын

Did they ever manage to prove that she (or someone else) was guilty of murdering that little boy?

@semicron5159

3 жыл бұрын

@@marycanary no this scene was at the end of the episode, the husband was found not guilty

@codename617

2 жыл бұрын

I hope they bring them back in the revival, kill them off and their killer(s) get off.

Wow that is one twisted narcissist. Her husband is no better.

@foolslayer9416

3 жыл бұрын

You had me at the first half, I thought you were talking about the lawyer that was sticking up for the husband.

@nicolepenkwit6530

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I thought unequally attracts each other but in this fall it‘s the other way around. There just evil.....and fantastic actors

@rhaspodel

3 жыл бұрын

They belong together. A power-hungry woman and a cheating lowlife narcissist

@leeniemuna4911

3 жыл бұрын

They deserve each other

@creativewriter3887

2 жыл бұрын

I don't know if it's full-on narcissism. That word gets thrown around a lot. She married for money and status, NOT for love and she probably knew he was a chronic cheater from the onset. As long as it created the perfect illusion and allusion of stability, mobility and wealth, she would tolerate everything else. If anything, it was next-level survival. The horrible tragedy is that two people had to pay the price for his proclivities. He should have been sent to jail.

Raise your hand if you’re confused.

@sonrouge

3 жыл бұрын

She pretended to be mixed up in order to create reasonable doubt with the jury.

@tbonerossigiggles6076

3 жыл бұрын

@@edwardokeavy5241 Me too, she cleverly victimized herself as a woman whose husband had affairs, while simultaneously trying to mar him, to confuse the jury; but she was doing it because she's fiercely loyal to her husband in a very sick and twisted way lol

@WarGrowlmon18

3 жыл бұрын

Husband and wife were in it TOGETHER

@samlsd9711

3 жыл бұрын

Basically she confused the dumbJurors. Since it's rarely to assume people can infect other people intentionally or unintentionally he is not held responsible. But I think this case was messed up all in all...

@raydavison4288

3 жыл бұрын

@@samlsd9711 I admire your nom de plume.

"The Truth. Whatever that is." Still accurate, and everyone still wondering what went wrong with society.

@gatorbyte5254

3 жыл бұрын

Society is made of people. Problems in society are the symptoms of what’s wrong with the people

@k.chriscaldwell4141

3 жыл бұрын

_"WMDs and "mobile launchers in Iraq."_ And Urban Moving Systems had nothing to do with that day in September of 2001?!

@brokenman58

3 жыл бұрын

Doesn't help when people started to change THE truth into "MY" truth.

@tanasiap8308

3 жыл бұрын

@@brokenman58 😂🤣😂 SOOO TRUE👏👏👏

@johnnyryall3966

3 жыл бұрын

The truth is what actually physically happened in this case anyway

IRL, they would have 1) Had it called a mistrial in the first place. 2) Counted her admission in the end as exactly that: An admission. In front of officers of the court. With the testimony of her admission by _even her own defence attorney_ , she would have been processed by the judge in a speedy trial. No jury needed, because confession.

@cloudtx

3 жыл бұрын

Could she have gotten away with it if she didn't spill the beans? (for the audience's sake, after all)

@denisheabates4344

2 жыл бұрын

👋🏿 I do

The wife was brilliant--playing on society's bias about marital relationships to win the whole ball game. Unfortunately, through youth or inexperience, ADA Southerland missed the writing on the wall when the wife explained how the same women willing to divorce for infidelity would willingly stand by their spouse accused of embezzlement or murder.

@kharilane1340

Жыл бұрын

She literally told Sutherland what she was going to do, stand by her spouse accused of murder.

@sammiemorgan2801

Жыл бұрын

Rfftwbc in hñj j m movies and then the first

@lucindamobley5492

11 ай бұрын

Those are completely different things than having your spouse cheat on you. I've never been married so odds are I'm going to get something wrong, but it always seemed to me that when your spouse cheats on you the trust is broken because they are giving away something that is supposed to be shared only with the one you married. If your spouse is accused of embezzlement or murder then that's a situation where the wife or husband is of the mindset that their spouse is innocent of the crime until it is proven otherwise.

@dietotaku

7 ай бұрын

@@lucindamobley5492 depends on how you view fidelity. open marriages exist. it's only cheating if he doesn't have her consent, which he clearly does. i see her point about women willing to divorce over infidelity but not murder, but i don't see how that telegraphs her intent to stay married through infidelity AND murder.

@lucindamobley5492

7 ай бұрын

@@dietotaku For me the idea of an open marriage feels like an invitation for more problems to enter the relationship than people think can be solved. God always intended for us to remain pure until we marry (men and women alike) because we would get hurt otherwise. And even then God can use what we do wrong for good.

This woman is the bond villain of bad legal ideas. She masterminds this evil plot to "get out of a perjury charge" and then proceeds to tell it to 3 officers of the court in the middle of a DA conference room. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@anthonyitaliano7316

3 жыл бұрын

@@emmyfall2143 how was your response posted before the comment your responding too, wtf

@alcoholandfun243

3 жыл бұрын

No, she played it perfectly. She told the truth. Then she lied. But then she admitted that she was lying. Where is the perjury? Which 1 is the lie? You sure you know? Prove it.

@biruss

3 жыл бұрын

@@alcoholandfun243 one of them must be. She at least catches an a misdemeanor

@alcoholandfun243

3 жыл бұрын

@@biruss Yep, one of then is. But which 1? The one she admitted to lying about? The one she corrected herself on? Or the one to told after? 🤷‍♂️

@biruss

3 жыл бұрын

@@alcoholandfun243 if 2 of them were under oath, it proves perjury happened

I’m sorry but that was genius! McCoy met his match and it wasn’t even another lawyer. lol Props to the actress and writers of this episode,

@ericthomas917

3 жыл бұрын

It was dumb to admit it to the though

@MrSpikethefirst

3 жыл бұрын

unfortunately for her she has no attorney-client privilege or privilege to privacy in this case and the prosecutors could very well re-try her for perjury and her husband on a mistrial.

@alcoholandfun243

3 жыл бұрын

@@ericthomas917 Admit what? That she lied the 1st time? The 2nd time? Or the 3rd time? She said she lied then corrected herself. Which is the lie?

@biruss

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrSpikethefirst not if they can't prove which was a lie

@biruss

3 жыл бұрын

@@r.rodriguez4991 good point. perjury beats mirder though.

So for those who are confused, here’s the rundown: The story starts with a carjacking/murder. The carjacker is caught quickly and the car found, but it turns out the victim was a lab tech transporting Caronavirus-SARS, the kind that had an outbreak in China, Canada and Singapore in the early 2000’s. It seems the doctor the lab tech works for was researching the disease. It turns out a small outbreak of COVID is occurring directly related to the doctor’s research. He’s a known serial-adulterer who’d fathered a child with a reporter. Said reporter wanted to change the relationship, so he injected her with Coronavirus to kill her off. Instead it weakened her and killed their son. The wife testified to appear vengeful and taint her testimony against him, knowing she was needed to make the case. With her corrupted testimony, her husband walked.

@miaferret9451

2 жыл бұрын

So that’s how the pandemic started! 😂 glad to know we finally have answers.

@annakepes8050

2 жыл бұрын

Calling it covid isnt totally wrong here bc it is a coronavirus but covid stands for coronavirus discovered. So here youd want to say covid-03. The reason it's called covid not covid-19 or sars-cov-2 nowadays is bc its still an ongoing pandemic

@aaliyahadams7886

2 жыл бұрын

@@annakepes8050 COVID doesn't stand for coronavirus discovered... It's coronavirus disease lmao

@angelagriffin5130

2 жыл бұрын

Yes. COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is a disease caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2

@sarcasticallyrearranged

2 жыл бұрын

Why would the wife purposely throw the case so he could walk after humiliated her? I guess it was an open relationship?

The Ending: Because of her "performance", the jury finds the doctor "not guilty", with the more sinister element on top of that being that the wife slips her hand into her husband's, and they hold hands while walking out of the courtroom. Actually one of my favorites because I'm a Law and Order (and pre-Stabler leaving on SVU) fan who likes it when the prosecution loses in a clever manner, or the right villain succeeds and gets away.

@sonrouge

3 жыл бұрын

Oh, they still could've gotten her on perjury (even recanting doesn't get you out of that) and the husband on bringing a dangerous virus into the US and transporting it irresponsibly.

@isitoveryet9525

3 жыл бұрын

@@sonrouge but they didn’t…. So there’s that lol

@angelabowman1614

2 жыл бұрын

That's evil. And they deserve each other. I feel bad for the son that died and his Mom, Eve though she shouldn't have been sleeping with a married man. She didn't deserve to lose her child. Sad. And that he got away with it, with the help of his wife?? Sickening. Wow....

She created a catch-22 out of thin air. That takes skill

How can someone kill their own child? The very person that gives you life is the one that takes it away. I can’t imagine. Same goes for the other way around

@ellejagerman6105

3 жыл бұрын

The no. 1 cause of death for pregnant women in America is murder at the hands of the father.

@user-eg5yy7vs9s

3 жыл бұрын

@@ellejagerman6105 Wrong. In fact, really really wrong. I did some digging around but even just a simple google search is enough to prove you wrong. You know the claim is sketchy when it goes against scientific consensus without a paper or study.

@thewrongshoes

3 жыл бұрын

He was trying to kill the mistress . I’m not sure the son was the target

@yumekojabami4038

3 жыл бұрын

bruh there are cases of parents abusing and killing their own children everywhere....plus, @Elle Jagerman, you are most certainly, and utterly wrong.

@Kreepinsgirl

3 жыл бұрын

Even when i watched the movie called the good son I still don't know if I would kill my own son even when he was the devil himself....

her acting is amazing

This is the first take-off of "Witness for the Prosecution" that does it justice. 👍to the writers and actress for carrying it off.

They could've gotten the wife for perjury (even if she recanted, she still perjured herself) and still could've gotten the husband for bringing SARS into the US and illegally and unsafely transporting it.

@kbhalacy

3 жыл бұрын

Also the mother of the dead son could sue for wrongful death

@sarcasticallyrearranged

2 жыл бұрын

Why wasn’t he charged with the murder of the son and injecting the virus into both of them?

@lenawagenfuehr53

2 жыл бұрын

Bringing SARS into the US🙄 bet you still call it the Spanish flu

@williamborom9943

2 жыл бұрын

I dont think any of the DAs on this show would have went for the case(Even McCoy when he made it), though clearly they could have. Any actual time the wife would have gotten would have been negligible at best and in every other way but physically a spit in the face to the mother who lost her son at worse. Not to mention how much support the DA would lose amongst certain significant voter groups for either going after a wife for "supporting" her husband on the stand regardless of the reality of the case OR for "knowingly coercing" a false testimony from a "vulnerable witness" and then vindictively punishing her for her inability to hold "the lie" together and again all she would get is whatever she would get for pejury charge if anything at all. Just a lose/lose situation on top of a loss.

Mrs. Blanchard played them like a fiddle.

Obsessed with this show, loved this segment presented here!

I like her . She uses her Brains instead of emotions

Now I have to watch the whole episode again. It’s hard to avoid watching an episode of Law and Order after the start credits begin, it also works the same for the clips.

if its happening in the court room its already a circus.

I've never seen this episode, but it seems like this is a take on "Witness for the Prosecution" (A fantastic movie, btw.)

@mariagraziacapitani8217

3 жыл бұрын

Yes!

@ulallume

3 жыл бұрын

Which was based on the short story by Agatha Christie.

@ellenhannon5298

3 жыл бұрын

I agree Marlene Dietrich and Charles Laughton were phenomenal

My counter would be "You think you've won? Have fun with your next STD test, not to mention splitting your husband's inheritance with his affair babies!"

@user-qn9bx3jm5d

2 жыл бұрын

A woman as smart and evil as her probably has her own ways to make sure neither of the options you gave could effect her.

@lenawagenfuehr53

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-qn9bx3jm5d nope. Inheritance law outmaneuvers her

I wish I could watch this whole episode now. This clip alone doesn’t make it easy to tell what exactly is going on.

@alexbrown7708

2 жыл бұрын

I would consider subscribing to peacock if they didn’t still make you watch adds

I would have thought Serena would have warned Jack about the wife not being normal

Do even longer ones next time

How in the living hell do most of these lawyers not get punched

These actors are quite good, the bit players who you don't see in any other shows really are really good actually.

@toastnjam7384

3 жыл бұрын

New York has a big pool of experience stage actors to pick from.

@howva

3 жыл бұрын

@@toastnjam7384 ay that's true didn't even think about that

@sarcasticallyrearranged

2 жыл бұрын

There’s many talented actors/musicians/artists who didn’t have the recognition or opportunity they needed. I wonder why someone ends up famous over the others? Ideas anyone?

I love law and order

Y’all I know it’s bad but look at it that was a really smart move but it’s really messed up

LAW & ORDER will always be legend.

Just realized this is the same actress who played the floaty/hippy Simone in Head of the Class back in the early nineties. She was Lady Macbeth / Witness for the Prosecution levels of excellence in this. Goes to show you how much untapped dramatic talent there often is in 'lighter' shows.

@lenawagenfuehr53

2 жыл бұрын

Khrystyne Haje

@robertlevine2827

Жыл бұрын

OMMFG!

You can tell how old this is. Nobody's using a smartphone.

2:56 someone please tell me how to get your hair like that?

"Witness for the Prosecution", Law and Order style.

Truth is whatever deception sticks the best.

What Are In Law & Order Opening Credits/Theme Music Used from 1990-1993 (Seasons 1-3) is?

Great actress!!

Plot straight out of "Witness for the Prosecution" with Marlena Detrick!

@YouTubeallowedmynametobestolen

3 жыл бұрын

Marlene Dietrich. (Hard name to spell.)

@meeraglides3485

3 жыл бұрын

Um.... Agatha Christie actually...

@YouTubeallowedmynametobestolen

3 жыл бұрын

@@meeraglides3485 WITH Marlene Dietrich. BY Agatha Christie. Or, more accurately, adapted from a play by Christie.

@jungletrouble8296

3 жыл бұрын

Fun fact: Dietrich means lockpick in german.

6:44 Looks like she was singing a Swan song .LOL

Oh i love Elizabeth Rohm

@gregoryjenkins8645

3 жыл бұрын

Me,too.😏

I love when McCoy loses

Was anyone else waiting for her head to start doing 360s 😳

I kinda sorta admire this lady.

Which season and episode of law and order is from....

Amazing episode! I get it all… except- the wife knows about (likely) dozens of affairs- she may ‘wear the pants’ between the two of them- but why stay with such a prolific serial cheater? No amount of money could be worth it. The husband and wife must have some weird bond that transcends all that…

@thewrongshoes

3 жыл бұрын

If you just want the money you could

@OverlordFlinx

2 жыл бұрын

I mean, like she said, it’s antiquated to get hung up on such things at a certain point with some people. She probably has flings too; but together they financially are far better off than any of the partners they keep. So why throw it away? Like she said, there are worse things than cheating.

@sarcasticallyrearranged

2 жыл бұрын

She doesn’t believe in monogamy and they seem fine with polygamy. Some people are okay with having an open relationship.

@JustLikeAFlower

2 жыл бұрын

@@OverlordFlinx Yep nine certain she was cheating as well she just did it better

@aaronjames5276

2 жыл бұрын

It was about way more than money. Standing, for example. And now she gets to watch him go rot, while she is seen as the tragic, wronged victim. It’s brilliant.

I've heard that attorneys who suggest that a witness lied on the stand usually lose their cases on appeal (appellate courts hate that sort of thing). This defense attorney probably had a better tactic than immediately accusing perjury, she just didn't take it.

Actually I don't mind they got off.... These two will always wonder when the other will kill them..... It's not like neither isn't capable..... If you deal with the devil... You better expect they will stab you in the back.....

3:00 FACTS!!! She's speaking the truth. I never looked at it that way.

To the wifes credit, she DOES make a damningly technical superior point: Murder and embezzelment FAR outclass the moral reprehesibility of faithless marriage actions. Not to say the cutting-off of ALL emotional response to cheating is much better, because it isnt. Lacking response to it comes off as irreconcilably sociopathic

What name has this blonde woman from the beginning? Im not sure but i think she played patrick jane shrink

Dammit she won

Why are seasons 1-12 missing from peacock?

Oh. "'" witness for the prosecution "'"

She's good. She's really good. Why the hell does such a brilliant woman put up with such a scoundrel?

@lasandrasweatt6138

3 жыл бұрын

Money power im sure is a socialite she wasn't trying to give up the lifestyle.

@ericthomas917

3 жыл бұрын

The woman is a sociopath obviously

@bursegsardaukar

11 ай бұрын

@horacehalt4216 Like Dune's Bene Gesserit Sisterhood. You let men think they are the ones with power while you carefully control them in the shadows. The wife probably wants him to think she will stick with him no matter what until the time comes when she sticks a knife into his back when he outlived his usefulness.

Sure....she suddenly is going to admit her anger in front of everyone.....after pretending

I’m pretty sure it’s still still illegal

RequItted? Requitted

1.What Are In Law & Order: Criminal Intent Opening Credits/Theme Music Used from 2001-2007 (Seasons 1-6) is? 2.What Are In Law & Order: Criminal Intent Opening Credits/Theme Music Used from 2007-2011 (Seasons 7-10) is?

@E.JayViera

3 жыл бұрын

The theme from S1-S6 is the Criminal Intent theme song, specifically made for that show. The music used for S7-S10 was from Law and Order: Trial By Jury.

@triphcapps9123

2 жыл бұрын

Its the director of music in a closet with tap shoes. He dropped it, and raised the pitch for the heel hitting the floor.

Did McCoy get her? I havent seen this episdo specifically but i know how it wouldve gone in the first few seasons. Ben Stone would have thrown every book at her and then some to make her roll, even if it meant she might die in custody, just to get the truth from her.

God bless a loyal wife

Diabolical!

At the DA's office, Mrs. Blanchard reveals her whole performance was an act calculated on the premise that it would be easier for the jury to believe a woman would lie to get back at her husband, than lie to protect him. McCoy sputters about perjury, but the ploy worked. The jury finds Dr. Blanchard not guilty on all counts. He and Mrs. Blanchard are seen holding hands as they walk out of the courtroom, and the episode ends.

This story is pretty much lifted from Agatha Christie’s Witness for the Prosecution.

3:10 actually true

Hell naw lemme go watch this full episode full fuckin now cuz I need to know what happen after😭😭😭

"He made her nauseous.'' You would think a medical professional would know the difference between nauseous and nauseated. I'll blame the writers.

@woldinini9988

Жыл бұрын

Bastardization of language. Semantic change. It’s nauseating to hear people say “nauseous” all of the time.

Funny thing is that in reality there are people like this woman who pretty much lie their way into everything in life and their whole life is a lie.

@lenawagenfuehr53

2 жыл бұрын

Oh, but the husband who murdered his own son (in attempting to kill his mistress) is a-OK?

@JosephRossetti

2 жыл бұрын

@@lenawagenfuehr53 Nice way to derail the topic of the issue at hand here. She's a pathological liar and is exactly no better than him. Both of them should be in prison equally. If you're defending her actions, then you're pretty much the same as she is which wouldn't surprise me a bit. Birds of the same feathers flock together.

So, what exactly happened right after this video?

@thewrongshoes

3 жыл бұрын

He gets off Scott free

😅 she’s manipulating all of them 😅 yes she played you all for a mistral 😅she confused the entire court and acted broken and emotional just so her husband could’ve acquitted 😅

That's what you get if you don't have objectively verifiable evidence

I'm surprised that wife's head doesn't spin 360°.

I like her!

a Witness for the Prosecution

I forget how this ended

Anyone who cheats on their spouse is low.

They played them hard.

Could someone put up full episodes please.

@billmurray7473

3 жыл бұрын

You have to buy those in sets of whole seasons on video.

@seppukumouse8005

3 жыл бұрын

Try peacock sub. Trail then cancel before 14th day

@justinmoore3217

3 жыл бұрын

Use putlocker

@miniena7774

3 жыл бұрын

@@billmurray7473 Pirate.

@Maryannkf

3 жыл бұрын

bruh thats illegal lmao

Hi Dow

Does anyone know how this ended?

@barbaragrosser4180

3 жыл бұрын

They (the husband and wife) got away with it.

Now that’s a wife

Their kid dying is their sin, shouldn't be a cheater.

I'm so lost what happened here?

@sonrouge

3 жыл бұрын

She pretended to be mixed up on the stand in order to create reasonable doubt with the jury.

Waiit. What's the ending?

@thewrongshoes

3 жыл бұрын

He got off

@mikedupont3585

3 жыл бұрын

@@thewrongshoes Apparently, with multiple women.

@NPCSingularity

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikedupont3585 Hi Oh!

I'd wish Doctor Bull would have gotten involved in these cases.

I think she was the beautiful redhead on Head of the Class.

They still could have got them locked up on other charges but ok

9:31 Excuse me?

I'm confused...

@Dj-th9fo

3 жыл бұрын

Me 2.....Me 2

This is why in good conscience I could not be a lawyer!!! Disgusting! Those kind of ppl will burn in hell....

@bursegsardaukar

11 ай бұрын

Watch the Rowan Atkinson comedy skit 'A warm welcome'. Rowan Atkinson (portraying the Devil) placed lawyers in the same group as looters, pillages and thieves. Lol.

Odd episode..

McCoy is sweating at 8:45. Hot on the set or in the court room?

shes cool

Ok

Elisabeth Rohm is blonde baddie most def

Mrs. Blanchard is a wimp. She should have packed up or kicked him out when she learned about the first affair.

@mevan883

2 жыл бұрын

She gets more money staying with him, the lifestyle she gets by staying with him versus leaving is different. I'm also guessing she has dirt on her husband in case he leaves her.

So what just happened

@jonathancampbell5231

3 жыл бұрын

Husband is a wealthy doctor poisoned his mistress with SARS, which lead to her infecting a dozen people including their child, who died. He gives the SARS box to his assistant to get rid of, but in a stroke of bad luck she gets murdered in a carjacking gone wrong. The SARS outbreak happens shortly afterwards and the police are able to connect the husband to the crime, but his wife says that he was with her the whole night he supposedly came over and poisoned his mistresses. Wife is a stone-cold narcissist who doesn't care about the affairs or all the people he killed, only the comfortable lifestyle he provides for her, so she tells conflicting stories on the stand in order to confuse the jury and make her think she is mad at her husband for cheating on her and is trying to frame him in revenge, which means they find him not guilty. Realistically McCoy could have just called for a mistrial and have her charged alongside her husband for perjury, obstruction and accessory after the fact. The defence lawyer would also be obligated to inform the judge that when the prosecution claims the wife just lied to protect her husband, they are telling the truth as she was present for her client gloating about it.

It's not a lie if you believe it

Smartest woman I’ve ever scene

@jdorffer

3 жыл бұрын

Oh wait she’s an amazing actress

@lenawagenfuehr53

2 жыл бұрын

Seen

So what happened did anyone go to Jail?

@cybertron3438

3 жыл бұрын

Sadly, no. The husband got off in the end but I don’t remember how in the world he was able to but from watching this scene. I believe it’s because of his wife’s testimony she created reasonable doubt when she changed her answer to the question: Where her husband was on that night.

@silencia08

3 жыл бұрын

@@cybertron3438 ya but didn't the wife also kinda confess in the presence of officers of the court (defense and prosecutor)

@cybertron3438

3 жыл бұрын

silencia08 I’m assuming you’re talking about the part at 9:38 . I agree with you that McCoy should have done something but since I’m not a lawyer or anything, I don’t know why he didn’t do anything about it. It’s a really a twister of an episode so I’m not surprised a lot of people are confused as to what the eff just happened there

@tinyelephant1533

3 жыл бұрын

@@cybertron3438 Yeah I was thinking the same thing. She literally just admitted to multiple officers that her whole testimony was a farce. I would've thought that McCoy (and possibly even the defense, as although defense attorneys do represent their clients zealously, it is illegal for them to still use a testimony/evidence that they KNOW is false) would've done something about that, but I guess he didn't for some reason lmao.

@tiffanymorgan6562

3 жыл бұрын

This was a classic example of how the guilty manage to walk away free.....just like Casey Anthony was able to do

Son of a........