These glasses, a steam deck, and a wireless xbox controller would be bliss. Since we're living in a dystopia, we might as well embrace the cool gadgets coming out of it.

@enac1544

4 ай бұрын

Seems half baked without a clear use case. You could use it on your steam deck or you could just use the steam deck screen without having this over your face and plugged in with a display constantly covering your view. Google glass is better than this and that’s been dead for 11 years.

@liquid79

4 ай бұрын

@@enac1544 Google glass was only capable of pop ups with text and simple graphics. It wasn't capable of outputting a 120-300in video screen on your face and you can see through the video if you want or you can adjust the dimming of the shades to three levels to block out the world a little to completely black. Why do people comment when they have no clue what their talking about.. aah the idiocy of people on the internet! 🤦🤦🤣

@enac1544

4 ай бұрын

@@liquid79 This is a showy of device that actually hinders your workflow or enjoyment in most cases, it hasn't changed anything and it's not going to change the way you do things for the better. It has a very small niche use case in a niche market and that's people who watch films by themselves in a reclining chair.

@Mike_Jones281

4 ай бұрын

​@enac1544 Your Steam Deck display is 7 inches. The Xreals are considerably more significant than the Steam Deck and way more vivid.

@enac1544

4 ай бұрын

@@liquid79 Google glass had a function, this is just screen mirroring. It’s an unnecessary technological yawn fest.

This is the best review for these glasses. Brief but somehow more detailed than every other one I have watched. REALLY LOVE

I can't speak on these but using the viture glasses with Samsung dex on my phone has been a game changer since the phones screens turns into a mouse pad. I've been able to actually work remotely with a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse paired to my phone which allows me to remote in to my MacBook or Windows computer without the need to even have either with me. I'm blind as a bat without glasses or contacts but not wearing either using the viture with the diopter to adjust to my vision is Crystal clear. Personally for me viture was the best choice.

@GiacomoRebonato

4 ай бұрын

wow! I didn't think about this!

@andrekravcenko8801

4 ай бұрын

Xreal do the same...

@lartrak

4 ай бұрын

@@andrekravcenko8801No they don't. Xreals don't have diopter adjustment.

@Perfectly_imperfect1

4 ай бұрын

@@andrekravcenko8801 the definitely do but the diopter for those who are blind like myself makes a big difference minus having to pay extra for the accessory that comes built in with vitures. Both are great I'm sure i dont think you could go wrong with either.

@ayoiji7731

4 ай бұрын

Very helpful comment!

The common complain i read from reddit is blurry edges. I think this is due to the fixed iPD (interpupillary distance). If only we can adjust the screen manually to our iPD that complain will disappear.

How do these compared to the Rayneo Air 2 XR glasses?

Beam arrived already, waiting for the Glasses and HDMI cable to arrive today 🎄👍🏾😁🙏🏾🎄 .. Never tried and visual stuff (VR , AR , 3D , ect .. ) so this will be my 1st experience with this type of technology .. I don't really have any particular expectations, just want to try something different and relatively new , possibly up and coming future tech , that may be mainstream one day .. Look at cell phones now , the glass can fold with the phone 🤳🏾 .. Look at earbuds and headphones, they are totally wireless now .. One day these glasses will probably be totally wireless .. Looking forward to seeing how this plays out .. praying I live to see the day .. I love tech 🎄👍🏾😁🙏🏾🎄

@somaplay

17 күн бұрын

Could you please share your experiences with it?

Thanks for this excellent video! I want to get a pair. I have the original ones, which I love, but these new features seem great!

Do you need to use prescription lenses? Do the original lenses fit? Would have been useful info to make the review comprehensive.

I use it with my Samsung S24 in Dex mode. Samsung S8 and above phones have a built-in mouse, which is great for productivity or viewing content. All you need is a USB-C cable.

That’s been my one criticism of VR and AR: cables. But it’s really tough to maintain a high enough data rate without them. Not to mention interference coming into play. I hope WiFi 6 helps this out more but I love where we’re going with this tech!

@rahzaelfoe3288

2 ай бұрын

Don't forget power. I'm assuming these don't have batteries (too small), which is why you need the extra accessory with it's own battery if using HDMI, since HDMI can't transmit power.

Hi There, wanting to know how does it handle incoming and outgoing phone calls when connecting to an android phone?

I wish these were more compatible with glass wearers whose eyesight isn't great, can it be adjusted outside of just enlarging the screen?

What you think about the rayneo air 2. I own the nreal first version, viture ar glasses and the rayneo 2. Like the tint on the viture and the lens adjustments. I like the look of the rayneo air 2 but the nreal hands down is the best view I had experience and that's the first on so I wonder how much better the nreal 2 is

Is there a reliable seller to purchase these glasses ?

These suck for people who have to wear glasses to correct vision

@KasparKindem

6 ай бұрын

You can buy a special prescription lenses which connects to the nose pad for users who normally wear glasses.

@brownwoodron

6 ай бұрын

@@KasparKindem Thank you

@jamesbondaygee

Ай бұрын

Indeed is there any solution for that

@RylzRiles

20 күн бұрын

Seems like a rather simple fix

My goto glasses have been the rokid max, the largest screen of any by far

Excellent review video but i was wondering if you can plug the usb-c end of a usb-c to hdmi cable into the glasses and the hdmi end into a console and get it to work that way. Then the only limitation is the length of the usb-c to hdmi cable. Please correct me if i am wrong.

When I was using the Air 2 pro, I noticed some reflective issues on the top area. I still don't know how to fix it. I don't think this is a flaw in my device but an imperfect design

Do they still sit abit awkwardly away from the face? Also will they ever consider a sideview mode mixed with body anchor mode? Wish they could auto adjust their darkness based on ambient lighting, would be a nice QoL addition

@English_Lessons_Pre-Int_Interm

Ай бұрын

there is some technology to dim transparent glass. You send electric current through your glass panels, and the glass changes transparency.

What about the built in 3dof that the viture has, but the xreal only with the purchase of the beam

Idk why, but I feel like people might end up cross eyed like they did in the movie “The Jerk” 😂

@laartwork

4 ай бұрын

Actually it's the opposite. Your eyes are focused in the distance. Because it can be transparent I had my daughter walk until she was "behind" the screen and it was 12 ft away. So your eyes are focusing much farther than you would with a phone or computer screen. Same with VR headsets.

Could these be used for navigation on a bike?

Is it possible to just connect a DP to C directly to the glasses? Just cut the beam out.

Told me exactly what i needed to know. Great video!

What happens when you lock your smartphone, do you get a black box or does it disappear so you have completely see through again?

can u add multiple displays inside?

Can the main lens be replaced with a regular lens? Because people like me who are over 40 years old wear glasses lens size plus 1.00

2:58 I think you meant an HDMI to USB-C cable instead since the Xbox in this case is your source. Also you could hook this up directly to any HDMI source if you want. You just need the right cable that will hopefully supply you audio as well. It's tricky but it's doable tho.

@AndrewCCM

5 ай бұрын

You would need to have power source as well to power the glasses.

@volcalstone

5 ай бұрын

@@AndrewCCM I have a cable that has a USB-C input for power along with another one with USB-A input.

@AndrewCCM

5 ай бұрын

@@volcalstoneyep. I would love to have one (third party) that included a battery vs having to connect another cable to a power source. Might try this along with the Viture battery/hdmi/usbC dongle. It’s around $69.

@AndrewCCM

5 ай бұрын

Just trying to avoid $129 for the beam and yet another cable for the HDMI to USB C. Just give me battery and HDMI port conversion in something that isn’t going to cost $140 extra. Lol

@volcalstone

5 ай бұрын

@@AndrewCCM you don't have to get the Beam. You could get their adaptor, it's like $50 or so. It's a powered hdmi to usb-c converter. I was actually trying to avoid using this even tho I have it by connecting my wire directly to the source. It just depends on what you're trying to hook up. Game consoles usually has usb ports so you should be fine. The switch would need a dock tho and I have a mini one that is also a power adapter. If you want something portable then you would need a USB-C adaptor with hdmi or DP out. You would course need an hmdi or DP to usb-c wire tho. I have the Beam also and they finally added apps to it. I just wish there was a way for us to add our own without it possibly disappearing with the next update. It kinda sucks that you can't stop any updates as well.

and here I am growing up getting yelled at for sitting too close to the TV

@dailynews5683

4 ай бұрын

lol. Yeah, that was a myth.

@BenVallack

2 ай бұрын

@@dailynews5683 Not when TVs had cathode rays it wasn't!

@BenVallack

2 ай бұрын

@@dailynews5683 Also the focus distance of this is much further away than the actual glasses is from your eyes

@wiewiorpl

17 күн бұрын

Umm... my old comodore monitor states that it emits less than 1uSv/h in 10cm from the screen. In worst case scenario you have 8hrs x 365d x 1uSv = 2920uSv per year. Public radiation safety limit is 1000uSv per year so you'd be 2.9x that. Your mother was right. It wasn't good for you. Also flicker and way image was drawn on CRTs wasnt good for eyes either.

@Grimshin1

17 күн бұрын

@@wiewiorpl I said it “jokingly” ofc, but thnx for the info! My mom was right about like 98% of everything haha ☺️☺️ do you know how the new led lightbulbs affects us? Don’t they flicker too?

I find this kind of device very isolating. I wonder what the experience would be like if you only had a display over one eye, and the other would see the external world. I did some basic experiments and found that it is pretty easy to mostly ignore one of your eyes input, so you can choose to pay attention to the monitor or to the real world allowing normal conversations and interactions as if you were wearing an eyepatch. I imagine the monitors are most of the cost, of the device, so it would be cheaper, or you could use a 1080p instead of a 720p. It would use ½ as much battery.

I'm interested in these as an alternative to my current setup. I walk 2 miles almost daily with my iPhone mounted around my neck with a flexible arm part that holds the screen up in front of me. It works well but if I could use these as both shades and be able to view KZread while walking, it would be worth any price.

the only option for a replacement usb cable of the same quality is the rokid cable which costs $40. Thicker cables pull the glasses off your face.

I won’t use them for gaming, but will use them for productivity apps when traveling for work. Do you feel these glasses wuld be a great way to get an external monitor for your computer when traveling? I see more reviews related to gaming than I do when traveling for work and meeting that extra laptop monitor.

What was that adaptor you was using @ 1:02?

@KasparKindem

6 ай бұрын

Its an adaptor designed for devices that lack USB-C compatibility, making it essential for connecting the XREAL with devices like the iPhone 14 or older models.

@derrickwilliams1210

6 ай бұрын

@@KasparKindem Thanks man

Nice Product, just too many cables. Need an option for one cable for USB C and HDMI with a Power Passthrough for long Gaming Sessions.

Seem what I like Apple vision to be on a fraction of the price. I wonder if works as a secondary monitor for Mac… and are there any health risks?

Good addition

What about other alternative brands and models?

Can i hook up a tiny camera for my prescription

You have best experience if you use a device with 16:9 ratio screen. If you use a phone like Sony Experia or z flip that’s what it exactly mirrors. Long horizontal screen. If you zoom in to fit it will crops lots of photo or video. Even pictures and videos will play in small video or will get cropped if zoomed on iPhone 15 pro. When in use with my 16:9 laptop experience is best.

@ljacobs357

Ай бұрын

Works fine with the Samsung S24 in Dex mode. I wish the Z Flip 5 had Dex.

So, it's low resolution and has bad contrast, is that correct?

Im intrigued. When i play on my switch or rog ally my hands start to go numb and my neck starts to hurt after an hour or so. Being able to rest my arms comfortably and not tilt my head down would be a game changer. I wish these weren't so pricey though. Seems like its a bit overpriced considering i can get a meta 2 for cheaper and a meta 3 for a similar cost.

@jensenraylight8011

6 ай бұрын

but you can't wear Meta 2 outdoor, while waiting for appointment or on airplane without looking like a clown. heck with this glasses, people won't even notice that you're watching netflix while sitting on a bench

@kenobi69yearsago57

5 ай бұрын

@@jensenraylight8011Agreed. I have never seen anyone wear a meta quest in public, that’d be ridiculous.

@brad7141

5 ай бұрын

@@jensenraylight8011 I will wear my glasses in the car waiting for sombody but they really kinda make me look odd. dont know not my style but i can assure you.... nobody gonna steal from a guy staring blindly in to the air on the train with his not so cool shades and over sized 1st gen ipod.

@gregzeng

5 ай бұрын

Will be ordering my setup from AliExpress. They seem lower-priced than other retailers. Tomorrow, they have their special prices. So I'll order tomorrow.

@tanerorkun5795

5 ай бұрын

At first I thought I will be wearing this glass everywhere I go, but in reality it is not the case. Maybe I bother if i will be sitting somewhere more than 1 hour. I bought this 2 weeks before I bought my metaquest 3 but I used metaquest maybe 20 times more than this for work, gaming and watching movies. I hoped this will be my main portable monitor as advertised but I'm sorry, xreal goes back. Maybe next time or I will try viture, which has smaller fov but no blurry edges.

I was very close to buying this but I saw two that I know bought it and returned them. I'll wait for now

Nice review, yah, had the same feeling. It’s wonderful when it works, but too many connection lines and additional accessories needed in order to have it work, and some don’t come with the box, have to research and buy. At the end, after trying for 2 weeks, returned the gaggle. May try again in the future when it becomes wireless, now it’s just too much to be fun.

@MrJerkfaceKevin

6 ай бұрын

I felt the same, bought these when they were called the NReal Air glasses and had the HDMI adapter and while to have such a large screen somewhat pocketable, the best use case right now for these is entertainment, movies, gaming from ur phone or tablet. I had finicking connection issues with my Switch. Great for COD mobile and game streaming from my iPad. I also tried working, I do software engineering so I’m reading lots of detailed code, and while using them was manageable, I wouldn’t recommend it for longer than 2-4 hr sessions due to eye strain. I’ve seen reviews using the Nebula app for extended desktops and the ability to anchor the screens rather than following u, but it still feels like 1. U are glued to ur workstation and 2. This is a luxury item that isn’t absolutely necessary for getting ur work done.

@PSYCHOV3N0M

6 ай бұрын

Wireless won't be a flawless experience even with mmWave technology.

@CrashBashL

5 ай бұрын

Ok. Keep waiting for that wireless experience...

Yes, I have the nReal Air glasses (without the beam, that didn't exist when I bought the nReal version of these). I would like an option, like beam that could throw to multiple outputs. My wife and I travel together most of the time and we generally share content that we are watching. It would be nice if we could have two outputs from the beam to support two glasses. I supposed that would require a bigger battery (more space and weight), but it would be worth it to me.

@AlexJorgensenPresident

4 ай бұрын

Viture is the only one that supports 2 glasses, with their mobile dock. I have the full setup and it works flawlessly!

that sure will make some super headaches... i wonder if u can use them regularly like playing game or watching a movie for 2 to 3 hours

Having the options for the grid and screen locked location features seem like the best of both worlds. I want something I can use while walking around or doing other tasks and a full screen is too large. Being able to shrink the size or place the screen in a corner of the view forward is great. Having the ability to connect without an added device, cables and expense is whats needed.

@zero11010

6 ай бұрын

Try to find a pair of old google glass.

why they didn't made the AR-Glass at the same size like the sunglass behind it? That would make more pixel possible and it would look much better.

CNET, it would be good if you can share from your experience, how the big screen feels like. Is it like having a 100" display in your room? I've tried mobile VR goggles before and some apps try to recreate a cinema ambience, but it end up feeling like a tiny display. Like a 32" display feels huge if up close to our face while a 100" display can still feel small at a distance of say 10m. Does the 320" at 10m really feel huge? And how does that scale with the 120" at 4m?

@reallyfrodo

5 ай бұрын

he mentions this at 3:46

@laartwork

4 ай бұрын

I measured focusing distance and got 130in at 12ft.

Is it suitable for those who wear reading glasses and those who wear distance glasses?

@daionusdrwg11

4 ай бұрын

You can get prescription lenses for them. It is, of course, a sperate cost of $150.

I worked as a Brand Ambassador for XREAL at CES this year and was really impressed with both the Air 2 Pro & Ultra. Unfortunately, the marketing agency they hired had a yahoo email and did not pay us. Lesson learned.

@sophiophile

4 ай бұрын

Post on their subreddit. You'll get paid.

Can you put your own prescription on them

I have been researching all the brands for my specific use cases. HDMI input from older iPhone, Drone and Mirrorless Camera video. The gaming part is basically not important at all for me. I just want the cleanest HUD type of device I can get without overly complicated wiring/batteries, etc. That's the one thing about these not coming with any type of onboard battery that kills it for me. I can probably mount the accessory to my Mirrorless cage somehow and then power it via the external battery I have...but this is just more weight, cables and clutter. The ultimate reason I need this is that I find even with external 7" LCD monitors, I can't quite focus well enough on the detail with my farsightedness even with glasses. Was hoping this tech could solve that for me. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

@brad7141

5 ай бұрын

I am far sighted my self. I can see with out needing contacts using these unlike sitting in front of my monitor. If you just want a very clean crisp monitor stuck in front of your face ... thats pretty much all these are. if your looking for having a multi monitor minority report style environment. these are not the glasses for you due to Xreal crippling there developers ability to make such apps for these. It is obtainable but requires more than just plug in stall play. as for the battery issue. yah if u dont plug in to the power grid your device will get drained faster than a happily married man with 9 kids.

@AndrewCCM

5 ай бұрын

@@brad7141I received mine a couple of days ago. Digging it. Looks fine with my farsightedness as you mention. Pretty happy with it and it serves the exact purpose I got them for. I do think the fov when directly connected to device (MacbookPro) is just a hair wide and the very edge of one side is a bit blurred, but not bad. Thanks for the reply.

Do you have to run the phone with the screen on as well?

@PSYCHOV3N0M

6 ай бұрын

Yes but there are Android apps that can black out your screen in order to lower battery consumption and reduce the chance of burn-in. Not sure about a black screen app for iOS.

So I just ordered the Vision Pro and am counting down the days; there are 3 more days till the party can begin. Interestingly, I can vouch that I had something like these XReal Air 2 Pros in 1995. I have long lost them and don't even remember the name of the VR System, but it did cost me $899 from Frys Electronics. It only had about three games, and you had to plug it in through the DVI port of a big desktop. It did allow me to watch TV or Video via composite IN/OUT on a simulated 80-inch screen. I might do some research and see if I can find out what the name of that device was.

@laartwork

4 ай бұрын

Itc was very low res but I remember them too. It's like technology finally caught up to the idea.

@kenpls

4 ай бұрын

Victormaxx stundmaster or cybermaxx

@TheLillianYoung

2 күн бұрын

I have the Vision Pro too and love that thing!! Flying with it was incredible. I am only interested in this for watching podcasts while walking.

Smart glasses are going to take off the moment they become fully wireless... and we finally have new superior battery technology to Lithium ion.

@mistamaog

4 ай бұрын

The issue is you'd have latency between the source and the displays on the glasses.

@AdmiralBison

4 ай бұрын

@@mistamaog Stuff could be run locally. I should have expanded on the "fully wireless" to "fully wireless and independent." - The arms of the glasses could house two batteries each and a micro-sd slot for massive storage. - Have Arm chips running the glasses and don't need to much power to run videos. - Speakers could be bone conducting as opposed to open. - Also, accessories like a glasses neck chain could house batteries in them to give smart glasses additional battery power.

@mistamaog

4 ай бұрын

@@AdmiralBison I'm sure we'll get something like that in the future, but for now, that would make the glasses quite bulky and basically be the size of VR goggles.

Are this better than the Viture? I hesitate a lot.. for mac/iOS the Viture looks like better. Any advice? Thanks community

@sergekonevsky

3 ай бұрын

Yes Viture is much better, especially for iOS and they are bringing it to Mac now!

how would this work for people with glasses

I have this Air 2 Pro. After using it for a few days, I feel that the image is relatively small and cannot be adjusted. Overall I am not very satisfied with it and a bit regret buying it

@ItsTheLedge

4 ай бұрын

Thank you for being honest. I was curious about this and was on the fence about purchasing. I might wait for a more user friendly model that lets you adjust the screen like the Apple Vision Pro and hopefully offers wireless capabilities or at least get the wires down to just one.

Can you get clear lenses instead? (Trying to link a handheld ultrasound to these glasses would be awesome)

Seeing a presenter that looks like he works out makes me instantly respect them more.

I want virtual monitor glasses that can project multiple virtual screens onto any surface in view at full ocular resolution. Very minimal 3D processing..Just mapping. At any distance. Minimal rendering needed. In real life multiple pictures or posters decorating your room because monitors with the glasses.

I used my Xreal Air 1 and have been very happy with my steam deck

Why does mine max out at 130 inches and urs goes to 330? Is there a different between us and uk models?

@ctbrokaw

4 ай бұрын

The screen is really about 1" but the marketing material I've seen claims it appears to be a 210" screen viewed from 6 meters away. So the 130" is probably at 4 meters, and the 330 is about 9 meters. Those numbers didn't clarify anything for me, so I did the math and figured it would look the same size as my computer monitor from 2' away, and my laptop screen from 18". Basically it will look like a normal size screen at a normal viewing distance.

I had them and got rid of them because full HD is far from enough for me

Why I am hearing these only now? This is what we need first for the VR/AR purposes, a just a display hovering in our vision to do a work in larger field of view, like in airplane, train, car etc... In any angle and position.

yah i would tottaly buy it if it would be possible with no cable like it is with the quest, where i can connect with my computer without cable

I still think none of them are getting the UI and control right. I think Viture with the neckband and a Bluetooth remote is getting the closest, but it needed esim. The FOV also needs to improve on all of these.

Do I need the Beam to watch Nexflix, etc?

@XP9724

2 ай бұрын

No, u can just connect it to your phone or laptop

awesome.. I can see a lot of use cases for this tech!!!!! I hope they can increase the battery life

@kmzzzzz

2 ай бұрын

It doesn’t use battery.

I'm currently using Nvidia's (discontinued) 3D Stereo Vision 2 glasses with outdated graphics drivers, because they don't work with newer nvidia drivers! They are a blast with many PC videogames! ewven with games that were not originally supported! 😎

Can you wear reading glasses underneath? I'm old.

Im confused on what these glasses do without the vean accessory

Sean Booker is my new favorite reviewer!

@PSYCHOV3N0M

6 ай бұрын

Tell me you have low standards without telling me you have low standards. 🤣🤣🤣 This "review" wasn't in-depth at all.

not any single reviewer mention about input lag while playing consoles game and xreal hdmi adapter 😒

I think for people with kids, it will be a miracle that they have time for gaming

@PSYCHOV3N0M

6 ай бұрын

Yup. My friend who's married and has 2 kids is lucky if his PS5 is turned on for even 2 hours PER WEEK. It's mostly collecting dust.

Can i use it with my xbox360 with hdmi output with the adapter?

Yea, this is what I want for my birthday

Buying the Xreal adapter £49 plus the Apple av adaptor £45 that is an extra £94 for a product that cost £449 i find very disappointing and now considering sending the whole thing back as i can survive without it.

I like it... Maybe next months

Didn’t you just made a video about this a few weeks ago?

Can the glass be connected to M1 Macbook Air directly - without using Beam?

@daionusdrwg11

4 ай бұрын

No. Laughs in PC.

There's zero need for the glasses to be wireless from the source device because the experience won't be great even with mmWave technology. Glasses like these will eventually be STAND-ALONE like a Quest 3 headset. Technical will keep improving over time.

Do a Beam video Versus Phone only pros and cons

How’s the eye fatigue / eye strain wearing these?

Would I need my glasses to see the screen inside?

I love my Xreal air 2 pro !!! You don't know how amazing they are until you try them .watching 3D movies are fuckin awesome!! 😎

Theese glasses are sick I got mine today, well worth the $450!! I have complete privacy at work for coworkers peeping over my shoulder to see my laptop

Con mi Pixel no funciona

Bummer you can’t cast media from your phone

Was utterly disappointed with the Pro 2, got the Beam with it. I was not prepared to have really tight horizontal boundaries/borders that kill immersion for me. Move your head slightly left or right and the sides of the screen cut off. You also have to keep fiddling with the nose adjustment to get the picture perfect. Massively overrated, so if you do purchase go in expecting the worst and you'll be ok.

Anything that sits this far away from your face just highlights that this kind of tech is not ready yet.

would you be able to fly drones with these?

Take my money now!

1080P still too low rez. needs to be at least 2k at that FOV to be very usable for productivity

@NeonPizzas

6 ай бұрын

1080p per eye, and being limited to 72hz with the Beam(Using Body Anchor) is still perfect for Nintendo Switch. Wonder how long it will take until they integrate the body anchor setting, capped at 120hz, with no additional latency, larger FOV and with 4K per eye.

@HanleyLeung

6 ай бұрын

yeah the application I'm looking at is being able to use it as a large monitor as I'm a Travel Entrepreneur and I can't bring my giant monitors around with me everywhere :) @@NeonPizzas

@kompanetspro2116

6 ай бұрын

Unfortunately Sony (xreal use it) didn't make yet a screen with such resolution and size

@Rainbowsaur

4 ай бұрын

bruh, the spec that matters here is ppd... its nearly 50 ppd ffs.. 2k at that fov would be over 80 ppd lmfao

its pretty painful to the eyes so far and not hd at all. idk man I'll keep testing. just got it

Once thoes become wireless they will be a game changer

Nice way to say Bye bye eyes

I’d love to hear some people’s use cases for these

@althyk

6 ай бұрын

I plug it on my S23, have moonlight on android to stream and sunshine on PC to play games. VLC i have to watch 3D movies and Kodi to watch 2D, or Disney+, Netflix, etc...

@Jollyeye

6 ай бұрын

dentist

@zero11010

6 ай бұрын

Everyone says the same thing. It’s good for movies. With most of these glasses there is a lack of clarity farther from the center of the monitors. So, text is less legible. He’s not talking about that at all which robs validity from a lot of what he’s saying. This means they’re garbage for productivity. Almost no one even talks about that entire use case other than to say … it can be your computer monitor system. This tells me they’re doing rushed, poor reviews (or they're intentionally not speaking about product weaknesses). The clarity issue is also a huge problem in some games because some games have text that you need to be able to read that isn’t only in the center of the screen. Most reviewers don’t talk about this at all (which tells me they’re not using the device for long or on many different games). For some games this would work for it great. For movies it’s pretty much ideal, especially with good headphones. Another thing they don’t talk about is the screen size and what that really amounts to. They’ll say “120 inch screen!” But, a 120 inch screen 50ft away won’t feel large. It’s a given screen size AT a given distance. For most of these glasses a 27inch monitor 24 inches (2ft) from your face is as big or bigger than the monitors they use (there’s simple high school level math for this kind of comparison). Check fine print on these … you’ll see “120 inches at 9ft” or something like that.

@sleepyjoe4529

6 ай бұрын

I am a teacher that has to do a lot of babysitting during homeroom and recess time, now I can watch youtube / movies while making sure kids are safe on the playground.

@25anomaly

6 ай бұрын

I’m looking for a similar setup for my motorcycle so I can run gps/rear facing camera. I need something that has a smaller display size I believe.

So, *basically they're VR glasses?* It's difficult to access what they do without actually wearing them.