The Germans did not know that the oil found in North Africa was much more than what they were looking for in the Caucasus

@earlbinvico

Ай бұрын

Even if they knew, they probably wouldn't have been able to use it. Since oil in Libya wasn't discovered until the 50s, there were not enough oil rigs, and it would've taken years to build some. There's also the navy problem. The Royal Navy was superior to the Regia Marina, and far superior to the Kriegsmarine. And both navies did not coordinate well and lacked proper radar technology, so the Royal Navy always kept superiority, and would've had no problem sinking tankers.

@bittheinfernoyt-roblox1262

Ай бұрын

@@earlbinvicoI mean the royal navy was scattered everywhere so they could of had a. Chance

@internetexplorer3999

Күн бұрын

the Italians tried several times to look for it even with German help but the technologies of that time were not sufficient to do so, we are talking about before the war

Imagine the German reaction when they found out about the oil discovered in Libya 10 years later

@internetexplorer3999

Күн бұрын

the Italians tried several times to look for it even with German help but the technologies of that time were not sufficient to do so, we are talking about before the war

You should have added a speech of Winston Churchill “Ibwemwashoupontetote Government”

@eirik3938

19 күн бұрын

Speech hits deep..

This is great but wtf happened with those casualty figures? Not even in the same solar system as accurate

how can they have 30k casualties with 30k men??

These statistics are deceptive. The British lost around 40000 through the entire N.A Campaign and took over 250000 Italian prisoners alone. This dude got his information from Mcdonalds.

@RangaTurk

Ай бұрын

The number of Axis troops evacuated from Tunisia appears to be wrong and the fighting continues for a couple of days after surrender. But new evidence seems to suggest fighting in the Balkans continued until May 18 1945. That is troops still fighting in German Wehrmacht uniform and U-boats still piloted in Kriegsmarine uniform to South America in July or even August 1945.

@thatoneonlymartinez

Ай бұрын

You don't understand. The video is sincerely only about the North African campaign war, the casualties are only in Africa since it is in Africa

@JacobStephen-vq3fb

Ай бұрын

@@thatoneonlymartinez I do understand. You didn't read my comment properly, especially since I specified it was the N.A Campaign, NORTH AFRICAN campaign.

@thatoneonlymartinez

Ай бұрын

The British can't just lose 40K during the whole 5 year North African campaign.

@JacobStephen-vq3fb

Ай бұрын

​@@thatoneonlymartinez Lasted just under 3 years. The British had 30-40k KIA compared to Italy's 20-30k KIA + 250000 - 350000 captured. Not including German losses / captures.

Wrong casualties

@sanchouz7443

Ай бұрын

As always

the fact that Italy had one of the richest colonies in the whole of Africa without knowing it hurts ... fun fact: there is an italian youtuber "la biblioteca di alessandria" that have done a what if serie if italy stayed neutral in ww2, and very beautiful, above all for the fact that it shows an Italy as Mussolini wanted it, plus a nation that is the judge and balancer of Europe and without losing many territories as in our timeline Italy is richer.

Either the casualty count is wrong or it counts most of the surrendered Greek army being made POW as casualties because the western Allies simply did not sustain 7:1 killed, wounded, or incapacitated in action against the Axis - even the Soviet Union didn’t sustain that

@strake3484

Ай бұрын

it's actually real. The italian soldiers got captured rather than killed

@user-ie3yq8jg8j

Ай бұрын

Allies casualties are not real. In dead there were nearly the same count as Italians had. But axis lost more as wounded and desapeared. Probably, there author counts only dead in Axis and I fon't know what in Allies..

@strake3484

Ай бұрын

@@user-ie3yq8jg8j No allies got more deaths. Italian deaths : 22k but 250k captured Allies : 220k and 50k missing or wounded

@mr.dudbud4551

Ай бұрын

​@@strake3484I don't see anything that says 220 k soldier died

@strake3484

Ай бұрын

@@mr.dudbud4551 I used the fastest one , Wikipedia

To all people.Even the casualty look not that accurate,Dont blame or harsh him hard in the comments.It took hours to edit this video,This guy need huge respect 🗿🗿

@thebigflop3118

Ай бұрын

Goo goo gaa gaa 😂😂

@Guridean

17 күн бұрын

this is stolen

@Guridean

17 күн бұрын

i think atleast

@tedtheteddybear97

12 күн бұрын

​@@thebigflop3118shut up kid

@tedtheteddybear97

12 күн бұрын

​@@GurideanI cant find any thing

Well made mate! Cheers

about the casulaties you should check your sources from an encyclopedia and other souces I have this " During the entire North African campaign, the Germans and Italians suffered 620,000 casualties, while the British Commonwealth lost 220,000 men. American casualties in Tunisia alone totaled more than 18,500. The Allied victory in North Africa destroyed or neutralized nearly 900,000 German and Italian troops, opened a second front against the Axis,"

@robertcedano6668

Ай бұрын

Nah bro

@Mike-gc2ro

Ай бұрын

Lol thats not even remotely accurate 🤣

@arandomguy1153

Ай бұрын

🤫🧏‍♂️

@darklysm8345

Ай бұрын

Totally, according to the trustworthy wikipedia, Axis lost 2 gorillion troops in north africa/day

@larsgrotjohann6554

26 күн бұрын

The nazis didn't invest that amount of soldiers in north Africa.

3:30 That one Army who encircled and Hold the Area : 🤫🧏‍♂️

@ashraf7242

Ай бұрын

The Aussies in Tabruk

@walidxking1184

Ай бұрын

😂

Where do you get the information about the losses? Something doesn't add up here xd

Stahlhelm please answer me, do these “soldiers” move the way they moved in real life or was it just done at random?

@ipitsgaming4

20 күн бұрын

Im not stahlhelm, but I'm pretty sure it's how they moved in irl (real life)

here comes the champion

Under rated

underrated

This video deserver more views and like 🔥🔥🔥🔥

What are those Casualties? you sure they are not the other way around?

Where were the Free French Forces who fought alongside the allies during the North African Campaign ? Especially during the battle of Bir Hakeim or Koufra ?

Is the casualties showing how many casualties were inflicted by this side? Because it seems that way.

Can you please do a tutorial or what app do u use?

despite how the allies tried to glorify this battle, we can all see that the allied causualties are much more than axis

@littlecoma320

Ай бұрын

the allies won at key moments but overall the axis won that battle

@NapoleanBlown-aparte

Ай бұрын

​@@littlecoma320 brother wtf are you talking about this allowed the saving of Malta and the invasion of sicily 💀

@noritamiaa

Ай бұрын

@@littlecoma320so are you telling me the axis won during operation barbarossa?

@littlecoma320

Ай бұрын

@@noritamiaa my brother in christ i meant that battle not the war the africa battle obviously they lost the war majorly

@littlecoma320

Ай бұрын

@@NapoleanBlown-aparte from a casualty standpoint they wont the battle from africa overall they lost the whole war lmao

GrandPa Jack fought in North Africa. Looks like I'm lucky to be here.

The casualties don’t feel right unless it’s counting the war in Greece and early on the Italian army got demolished but the casualties didn’t reflect

Fun fact: the Brits sent to Greece so they could defend it instead of pushing further into Libya weren’t given their extra pay for serving outside of europe

It’s a cool map, but you got the casualties way off. The Axis suffered about 620,000 casualties compared the Allied 238,500. This is according to the holocaust encyclopedia.

@Superdiocaneladro

Ай бұрын

The video take into account WIA and KIA, the allied suffered way more casualties under those 2 categories. But if we count also the POW yes, the count of the axis losses should be higher couse the italians POW in Total were something likes 250.000

@yourlocaltrucker6663

Ай бұрын

@@SuperdiocaneladroYeah, but POWs matter just as much as KIA and WIA. All of those scenarios take a soldier out of battle, so I have no clue why it wasn’t included

Great animation, this deserves respect

Best video map for north africa ww2 frint.thank you

Should definitely include POWs to get a better understanding of the situation.

🔥

I 1:30, italian army number go down from 150.000 to 70.000 while casualty numbers to from 4000 to just 4900 lol, casualty numbers are wrong

Только я заметил что это видео делал русский человек

Keep on posting, your gonna get more subs one day!🔥🔥🔥

@Illinoismoderate

Ай бұрын

And that day, is today.

Didn't the Greek government-in-exile also contributed in the North African campaign? The map doesn't show the Greek banner.

Bro the allied casualty numbers are f*cked up

A Libyan person was here ❤

I'm not sure why everyone thinks that the casualties are wrong. They seem correct from my research.

@Skrevs1

Ай бұрын

"Casualties check out" -animation_reich

@Animation_reich

Ай бұрын

@@Skrevs1 Casualties from wikipeadia looks same as the video.

@Skrevs1

Ай бұрын

@@Animation_reich The axis casualties are missing on wikipedia which is why the number is so low

в каком приложении делаешь такие анимации?

@StahlhelmMaps

Ай бұрын

Adobe After Effects

@cpj93070

Ай бұрын

@@StahlhelmMaps You seriously need to fix your casualties figures because they are all wrong.

The casualties completely off

The italians suffered many more casualties than the british did in north africa

What is the black flag in greece in 2:24 it looks like Heydrich

@StahlhelmMaps

Ай бұрын

Waffen SS divisions

❤

Casualty numbers are way off, and it can only be concluded that there is bias at work here since this stuff is very easy to look up. We can take some known dates on these. - At the start of Operation Compass, on 9 December 1940, the Allies are listed as having lost 21,403 men while the Axis have lost only 3791. But there had been little meaningful combat anywhere at this point; the Greco Italian war was going but had not had huge casualties yet, and what casualties existed were roughly balanced between the two sides. Naval losses might account for some of it, but the Axis were taking naval losses too which don't seem reflected. - By the end of Compass on 9 February 1941, the Axis should have lost at least 15,500 KIA/WIA just from that battle. I assume that POW are for some reason not counted in all this (they would be another 133,300 Axis losses if they were, since Italian 10th army was totally destroyed). Allied losses in Compass were about 1,900. The listed losses are 36,441 Allied (so an additional 15,038) and 6,454 Axis (so an additional 2,663). It's as if the casualty numbers are reversed. - By the end of the first stage of the Greco-Italian war on 23 April 1941 (when Germany intervened), the Axis should have lost another 13,755 KIA, 50,874 WIA, and 3,914 missing (again ignoring POW), for an additional 68,500 Axis casualties. Allied losses were 13,325 KIA, 42,485 WIA, and 1,237 missing for a total of 57,047. - So, adding up just Compass and Greco-Italian war, and ignoring naval losses and Rommel's counterattack in Cyrenaica, on 23 April 1941 Axis losses should be a minimum of ~90,000 and Allied losses a minimum of ~59,000. Allied losses are approximately close, but Axis losses are low *by a full order of magnitude*. and again, that's before 133,000 Axis POW are accounted for. - At the start of Second El Alamein on 23 October 1942, Axis losses are listed as 33,499 with 189,072 Allied losses. On 11 November, when that battle ended, the Axis had lost somewhere between 6,800 and 24,000 men KIA/WIA, with a further 35,000-49,000 captured. Allied losses were 13,560 KIA/WIA/POW/MIA. Listed numbers on 11 November are 34,290 Axis, 193,600 Allied. So in the decisive Allied victory at El Alamein (and including numbers from Operation Torch), it appears the Axis have lost 791 men and the Allies have lost 4,528. Ignoring the upper range estimates that have Axis KIA/MIA/WIA *higher than Allied losses* during El Alamein (let alone the 40,000 POW), there is no sense at all to having the allies lose nearly 6 to 1 in their most major victory. - This is apparently some sort of alternate reality where February has 30 days.

@Tankproduction2022

13 күн бұрын

Very well said thank you. Worse video depicting the casualties numbers ever.

That casualty comparison is the epitome of the coping Wehraboo😂

Why wasn’t there any Egyptian soldiers fighting since they gained independence in 1922?

@proboy304

Ай бұрын

FR

@RangaTurk

Ай бұрын

Decent point but Anglo-Egyptian Sudan ended in 1922.

@balerionsmith4038

Ай бұрын

@@RangaTurk I mean Egypt was independent from the UK at the time and the axis attacked Egyptian lands, so there should be some Egyptian troops on the front

@T6U7

Ай бұрын

@@balerionsmith4038 well not independence, it got autonomy, like a dominion or sm

@balerionsmith4038

Ай бұрын

@@T6U7 nuh uh, they officially gained independence in 1922 but they remained under British influence (not occupation) until 1952

خسائر الحلفاء مقارنةً بخسائر دول المحور كبيره للغايه!

7:25 Why didn't they send these 350,000 soldiers when they were winning? to get to Suez...

Макароны с колбасками против мяса и рыбы

Там видно ты наш! Ты русский! УРА!!! Хоть кто-то русский в этой теме.

@StahlhelmMaps

Ай бұрын

да я да :)

Немцы и итальянцы:разламывают оборону союзников. Австралийцы,окруженные в Тобруке:😐

Братан, это просто имба

The reason Erwin Rommel lost in the battle of El Alamein was cuz the Allies knew his tactic of going behind them and encircling them so they decided to get pushed to an area where you cannot go behind them (the mountainous area you see on the map) since Erwin Rommel couldnt go there with his tanks hes tactics didnt work and then Allies had much larger army much more tech and much more recources so he lost the weak army Hitler gave to him which resurted to the end of the Campaing for allies victory! (USA joining the war in Algeria was also something you should take in mind since it was Americas first operation in the European side of the war)

What the hell are number? Did you realize casualties number are wrong? I learn number casualties? I need you see this? 🇺🇲🇿🇦🇬🇧🇦🇺🇨🇿🇬🇷🇲🇫🇵🇱 - 254,211 Allies 🇨🇵🇩🇪🇮🇹 - 577,658 Axis Only people Wikipedia.

Casualties are wrong very wrong

@cadenbajada7583

Ай бұрын

Injuries are causuties

@timonurcikan8196

Ай бұрын

@@cadenbajada7583 i know but for example italian casualties in the 1940 italian offensive to egypt were 100 000 men and british were 2000 - 3000 men and there is shown that british casualties were 5 times higher

@jessiehiers4567

Ай бұрын

SO

@thebigm7558

Ай бұрын

Also the speeches had nothing to do with the time

no child porn no sex with minors no illegal drugs and no illegal firearms in any nation or violence against women or children!!!!!!!!!!

@thebigflop3118

Ай бұрын

You’re supporting many great causes but this is a ww2 video

rommel was the german general of this campaign!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Один я заметил что названия городов переведины на русский язык?Автор использовал карты на русском языке?Интересно

The Germans had the best fighters in the world.

French (hope not those from Nazi Vishy state) and Greeks in African campaign kekw sure whatever. But still you forgot to include thousends of Polish brave soldier who died on African land near Tobruk and other places in Libia from 41 until the invasion Sicili. Educate yourself before posting anything cause its not only hilarious but also offensive.

хайфелл?

@StahlhelmMaps

2 ай бұрын

гондож

Что за бред итальянцы во время рперации компас потеряли не менее 100000 там была уйма пленных.

Почему на этом шедевре так мало просмотров

Наш слон

In reality the Axis sustained 40,000 casualties in Tunisia alone before surrendering a quarter of a million Axis troops as POW to the Allies The Axis lost for a reason and that reason is that the Allies crushed them in battle

@TRBen19

Ай бұрын

"During the entire North African campaign, the Germans and Italians suffered 620,000 casualties, while the British Commonwealth lost 220,000 men. American casualties in Tunisia alone totaled more than 18,500. The Allied victory in North Africa destroyed or neutralized nearly 900,000 German and Italian troops, opened a second front against the Axis,"

EGYPT WAS INDEPENDENT

@Aidensaviation178

Ай бұрын

No they weren’t

@proboy304

Ай бұрын

@@Aidensaviation178 yes it was kingdom of egypt got its independence in 1922 (it was semi-independent but some say britian took it again in 1936 and after ww2 it got independence again)

@Aidensaviation178

Ай бұрын

Issue is British re took control so it was technically british for a short period

@proboy304

Ай бұрын

@@Aidensaviation178 ohhh

@JuanJoseMariaSanchezLopez

Ай бұрын

It was independent but it was still ruled by Britain

Vive la France et le royaume uni

you have seen that the cities are written in Russian maybe the author is Russian

@StahlhelmMaps

Ай бұрын

yes, i'm russian

@TRBen19

Ай бұрын

@@StahlhelmMaps It is because of that your casualties are totally false ? I means you only can get false sources about the casulaties because propaganda.