We have not forgotten that France is America's oldest ally and in the spirit of Lafayette may it always be so...!!

@eli72481

8 жыл бұрын

Yes! We would have lost the revolutionary war were it not for the French.

@cravateananas

5 жыл бұрын

And you lads grew free and strong from that to return the favor down the line Despite the banter, the French and the American have much in common, should one suffer, the other will help Love from good old France, keep on being yourselves lads

@etienne3971

5 жыл бұрын

we helped you just to bother English XD

@1935rmb

5 жыл бұрын

America[s oldest ENEMY.

@davidmarshall1259

5 жыл бұрын

@@georgschnidt172 NEVER trust the French. even today Macron kisses Merkels ass.

Far, far too many Americans hold the French Army in low regard, on account of the events of 1940. In many instances French troops fought with bravery and self-sacrifice, and not just at Dunkirk.

@AdaL0906

2 жыл бұрын

And for Americans who would not take French penetration into Germany seriously. We can also remind them of the landing in Provence, carried out in large part by the armies of Free France. (I may be too patriotic 😅)

@klausrain111

Жыл бұрын

Don't forget thd French Resistance! They fought very effectively in secret behind the lines.

@L_Train

Жыл бұрын

I don't think many people know just how good French special operations forces are right now and just what all they are doing around the world

@fredo69ification

Жыл бұрын

This is false.

@vallas8345

Жыл бұрын

@@fredo69ification false what? Arabs participated ww2 too

" Every man has two country, his own and France" Thomas Jefferson 19 Oct 1781

@jacques8221

6 жыл бұрын

that means the French only have one ? ;)

@mogensdrger7041

6 жыл бұрын

Jpm Yy

@grosvenorclub

5 жыл бұрын

Spoken at a time when they could do with a loan or two !

@crishamedet7525

5 жыл бұрын

Yes.

@charlesmadison1384

5 жыл бұрын

@@jacques8221 , the French were colonialists ... they had many countries.

As Brits we are grateful for the gallant rearguard protection you gave us in 1941, which allowed us to evacuate our army, the British Expeditionary Force, and some of the French Army. Vive La France, libre ! God Save The Queen !

@alf3811

3 жыл бұрын

1940*

@ahceneaissani846

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks bro

@stephen10.

2 жыл бұрын

france and uk should stop the childishness after brexit. We must be good friend again , we need it

@tititata3882

Жыл бұрын

God no Save The Queen of vmerde

@tititata3882

4 ай бұрын

no God Save The Queen

Si on avait eu en 1940 les chefs qu'on avait en 1943/1945........

@lapinmalin8626

Жыл бұрын

Et les politiciens aussi bien comprendre que c'est encore la faute à la gauche cette débâcle elle qui s'amusait à mettre des bâton dans les roues à la modernisation de l'armement Français Ils ne seraient jamais passé à Sedan et comme il leur était impossible de passer par un autre endroit car il y avait la ligne Maginot s'en était finis de leur offensive

No, we Americans and the British did not win the war against Nazi Germany by ourselves. The French forces fought alongside and fought well - the French Army, Free French, French Army of the Interior - le Resistance, French colonial troops - and were ably led by such generals as DeGaulle, Leclerc, DeLattre, Koenig, etc. They were there and the honor of France was ensured. Vive la France !!

@roms4154

9 жыл бұрын

John Peppmeier thanks bro !! france and USA brother in arms !

@jeffkodiac

8 жыл бұрын

+K Woods You just forget the Soviets were a kind of allies with the nazi and they were also armed by the Americans .

@Heimrik01

8 жыл бұрын

+John Peppmeier Je suis touché par votre témoignage Monsieur ! Un patriote

@amesbancal

8 жыл бұрын

Thank you my friend

@f.friedrichkling-hauss3807

8 жыл бұрын

+ K Woods Your comment is typical revisionist BS. You state America Entered the war in year 5 of a 6 year war. Read the history, fool. America Entered the war in Europe officially in December 1941 or year 2 +3 months. While your screen name, Woods, denotes someone of British ancestry, in reality you are most likely Russian. Furthermore, soldiers from virtually all of Europe fought with Germany on the Eastern Front Including but not limited to GERMAN ALLIES ON EASTERN FRONT: Finland 500k, Latvia 100k , Hungary 800k, Romania 500k, Croatia 165k, Estonia 63k, Spain 57k, Netherlands 44k, Slovakia 45k, Belgium 39k, Italy 250k, Poland 23k, Lithuania 24k, France 12k, Norway 9k, Denmark 9k, Sweden 17k, and this part will really get you excited: Soldiers from Soviet Union who enlisted for service with German Whermacht totaled 1.630.000, Cossacks 250k, Russia proper 800k, Caucauses 280k, Ukraine 250k, Byelorussia 49k these figures were obtained from the US Army War College.

Lets not forget Canada , Australia , New Zealand , India and many other countries that all contributed .

@snowballcorners

5 жыл бұрын

Yes the Canada that liberated Holland

@postmortem9642

5 жыл бұрын

Ähhhm, the whole world fought against germany, 53 countrys against germany^^

@plumduffy334

4 жыл бұрын

@@postmortem9642 Italy, Japan, Romania, Bulgaria fought on the same side as the Germans

@crishamedet7525

4 жыл бұрын

@@plumduffy334 et la Hongrie.

@sweetswan391

3 жыл бұрын

@@plumduffy334 romania then switched sides wich shortened the war by a couple months

Comme a dit Napoléon a Waterloo "j'ai commis une erreur dans ma vie, j'aurais dû brûler Berlin"

@nicolasdubos2797

4 жыл бұрын

Disons que si Napoléon avait été Hitler, l'histoire aurrait été très différente en effet. Mais à l'époque l'idée était d'assouvir un souverain où un chef, pas un peuple.

@ey6713

3 жыл бұрын

@@nicolasdubos2797 la différence entre les deux c'est la différence entre le libérateur et l'esclavagiste

@bleachigo783

3 жыл бұрын

@lorenz thurold non 😂

@unitedkingdom_thestrongest3531

2 жыл бұрын

🏳️🏳️

@bleachigo783

2 жыл бұрын

@@unitedkingdom_thestrongest3531 🤔

Merci d'avoir posté ce film magnifique. Il est honteux que même aujourd'hui, dans le monde anglophone, on continue de répéter pas mal de bêtises au sujet des soldats français, qui ont toujours fait preuve d'une grande valeur au cours de la deuxième guerre.

My father was part of this army..... great documentary!!!! Thanks.

@jeanpaullataillade5695

5 жыл бұрын

So was mine ! 1er RICM

@TheLoxapac

2 жыл бұрын

My grandfather too. 1er REC (5eDB, 1ere armée. ) He joind the 1st foreign cavalry reg. In 1943, then led a m8 greyhound squadron in operation Dragoon and Alsace, and finished in Stuttgart leading a M5a1 Stuart squadron . I still have his helmet.

@user-yq1ls9ij5r

2 жыл бұрын

you should all be ashamed of your grandfathers because of them Europe is in shit

Toujours fière de mes ancêtres qui ont combattu pour leur patrie!

@red0007maroc

4 жыл бұрын

Oui ses la division marocain et algérien qui as libre la France

@leburrito8678

4 жыл бұрын

@@red0007maroc non

@orioncoke1

4 жыл бұрын

@@red0007maroc Une multitude de nationalités a combattus sous les couleurs françaises ... oublie pas les polynésien,africain,européens morts ensemble ...

@Nettempereur

4 жыл бұрын

@@red0007maroc Quand on dit division algérienne, ça ne veut pas dire qu'il n'y avait que des soldats algériens. Cela veut dire que c'était l'Armée présente en Algérie Française. Il y avait aussi bien des unités "blanches" (Zouaves, Chasseurs d'Afrique) que "indigènes" (Tirailleurs). Par ailleurs, ni ces unités blanches ou indigènes n'étaient homogènes ! Il y a toujours eu, même si minoritairement, des musulmans dans les unités dites "blanches" et des Français de souche européenne dans les unités dites "indigènes" (je ne parle pas seulement des officiers mais aussi de sous-officiers). Lors du Débarquement en Provence, beaucoup de ceux qui chantaient "C'est nous les Africains" étaient des Français blancs. Il est désastreux de voir, aussi bien en France qu'en Afrique du Nord, le niveau d'ignorance lorsqu'on parle de l'Armée d'Afrique ou des Troupes Coloniales (déjà connaître la distinction entre les deux). C'est dommage car c'est vraiment une très belle histoire et cela aiderait sûrement à tordre le cou à des présupposés qui continuent d'envenimer les relations entre nos pays.

This video is not meant to bash Germany. It is only a video of historical interest, showing the role of France in the last stages of WW2. I have learnt German language since I was 10, I love Germany, being there three times already. I know WW2 was the suicide of Europe but it is not the point of the video. I am only translating and showing to non-Francophone people some documents about French Military History. I am not removing it. Your point about the Jews is irrelevant and racist.

@Exodon2020

6 жыл бұрын

I don't see any problem here. Despite the fact that this video only shows the French army advancing into Germany instead of stirring any further useless hatred at this point of the war. And even if it did - those movies are the testament of old Europe. The Europe of bickering Nations - divided by hatred, fighting one another even beyond the bitter end. The Europe our two great Nations finally decided to bury (hopefully for good) in 1952 to emerge into something new, better more properous than anyone could have imagined before.

@juangarcia-sz8pl

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah. All late. The French were pathetic and should have been ashamed of themselves. The US and Britain never were invaded by the Germans

@adrien5834

4 жыл бұрын

@@juangarcia-sz8pl Grow up

@maximusextreme3725

3 жыл бұрын

@Cpl. Rook Body of water or not, Germany underestimated the British resolve imo.

@oups5670

3 жыл бұрын

@@juangarcia-sz8pl because the french sacrified themselves in Dunkirk while britains were going back to their home...

Many people forget about the pivotal role the Free French and the later refounded French army had in the war.If you wish I can tell the reason why but it's always easier to joke right? P.S. I'm not even French.

@cengizsogutlu

4 жыл бұрын

Lol lend leased by USA trained by UK saved by USSR east front. France was loser where were they when Germany invade Poland... If they launched attack from Strasbourg to Rhine war was over in 1940...

@linaro1801

4 жыл бұрын

I would like to explain the reasons if you still use this account.

@slobama

4 жыл бұрын

@@cengizsogutlu Lest we forget the Vichy France who sided with the Germans and fought the allies under the traitor General Philppe Petain. They captured Jews in France and gave them to the Germans and resisted the Allies during the invasion of France.

@Geckoman-eb9hg

4 жыл бұрын

@@cengizsogutlu What do you mean where were they? Those French politicians were too afraid to start a major offensive while Germany was still vulnerable. Too focused on defence. If they had Charle de Gaulle or Phillipe Petain in charge then maybe there wouldn't be a ww2 as they both had similar tactics to the German Blitzkrieg. But I guess you can never trust those socialist politicians anyway.

@felix25ize

3 жыл бұрын

@@slobama False. Pétain never let his army and navy fight besides the nazis; germen called him " Marshall Nein "

I knew a great and humble man a Warrant Officer, who fought in this army under the General Jean de Lattre de Tassigny a truly outstanding French army general during World War two. The quality of the film is outstanding.

Merci à tous pour votre soutien :)

La france avait la plus puissante armée du monde et était la 3 ème économie mondial en 39 l'Allemagne a détruit et volé sa puissance industriel voila pourquoi son équipement était étranger lors de la libération durant la 1er guerre mondiale c'est la france qui a équipé les usa

@adrienlevy5128

5 жыл бұрын

Ceci est faux, désolé. Bien que notre armée fut importante ses méthodes étaient obsolètes et elle n'était surement pas la 3e économie mondiale car cette place etait alors occupée par le Japon;

@fulse1856

5 жыл бұрын

Oue et formé au combat de trancher car ils ne connaissaient pas mais après à la seconde guerre mondiale, ça c'est inversé et c'était les us qui était en avance en terme de technique.

@jeangenie9597

5 жыл бұрын

Pytheas Fidus Euh non, l’armée française est bien supérieure à l’armée allemande en 1939. L’Allemagne n’avait même pas une stratégie militaire correcte, c’est d’ailleurs l’une des raisons pour laquelle l’Italie n’a pas décidé de lui venir en aide. La victoire de l’Allemagne est du à une série de victoires purement tactiques qui ont fait volé en éclat la coordination entre les armées alliés ( l’état-major français qui n’apprend que plusieurs jours après que les britanniques ont décidé de se replier sur Dunkerque pour regagner la Grande Bretagne). Rajoutons à cela un commandement allié phantasmans sur une prétendue supériorité de l’armée allemande, alors que celle-ci n’a quasiment que des chars récupérés en Tchécoslovaquie ou dépasser pour former le gros de ses forces blindées.

@guillaumelegoff4152

5 жыл бұрын

Les britanniques ont zappe le passage où la France les a sauvée à Dunkerque et ou nous avions envahi le rich à leur côté en 44 45 pour eux on a rien fait que fuir

@popof2354

5 жыл бұрын

La France en 1939 avait l’armée la plus puissante et est très bien équipée avec du matériels en avance face à l’armée allemande la différence fut le nombre l’usage et les officiers, la ou nous avons péché c’est que nous pensions comme en 14/18 et que l’armée allemande elle agissait en mouvement constant avec des officiers qui prenaient l’initiative sans compter que leur chars était en formation de divisions blindées et nous en paquet de 5 ou 10 avec des troupes à pieds en appuie!! Nous avions très peux de radio portative et l’armée Française n’agissez pas en synchronisation blindé armée aviation bref une armée aux principes archaïques ou nos vieux généraux nous ont précipité dans une défaite fatale certain ont bien essayé de sauver les meubles (Général De Gaule) mais écouter trop tard pour sauver le peux qu’il rester, donc ne soyez pas injuste envers nos troupes qui se sont bien battus bien plus quel ne pouvez et souvent sans appuie ni munitions 🇫🇷

In the movie above to clearly see the French flag in Sherman tanks used by the Free French Forces.

@kurochigo

4 ай бұрын

🇫🇷🤝🇺🇸

I wish the French were more prepared in WWII, they had so much potential...

@MegaWolfgang

9 жыл бұрын

Räterepublik they were but they had terrible leadership in 1940.

@DavidJGillCA

8 жыл бұрын

+Karl Berg Total domestic political chaos really and military leaders hostile to change. French political and military leaders put their authority and personal prestige above national interest. Weak willed politicians deferred to the old guard of generals in the French army who were hostile to change and had failed to assess the new capabilities of the German military.

@MrPedophileMuhammad

8 жыл бұрын

+Superorganismus We were but with a very poor leadership a very conservat

@gabrielheraud41

7 жыл бұрын

France lost in 1940 because it hadn't warplanes to cover its tanks. If it had, France would have won because its gear was better than the German one

@williamshortfilm5818

7 жыл бұрын

We shot down more german planes in the battle of france then the british in the battle of brittain.

it is the french who came up with tank designs that will be used by all sides in world war 2 and beyond. france built the first tanks with rotating turrets during world war one. so everybody say thank you France . and also the ideas of the lightning war also comes from general degaul himself, the Germans studied his idea and used it successfully in the western front and the invasion of russia.

@Nettempereur

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, de Gaulle was a staunch supporter of tank-oriented strategy but the father of blitzkrieg warfare in France is actually General Estienne, the "father of tanks" as we call him in France. Thanks for your posts.

@copsondonuts

5 жыл бұрын

Yes they actually had good tanks. The french were also fighting decently before reynaulds panic and phone call to churchill.

@ph390

4 жыл бұрын

@@copsondonutsluckily the French saved the ass of the English in Dunkirk .. calls Churchill to tell him ... loool

War is hell.People of all nations should resist their leaders in starting wars.

Ça vaut le coup de souligner la participation des régiments d'Afrique du Nord dans ces combats.

As time fades, and, the courage, bravery, and sacrifice of the French military, and, Partisans goes into the history books I salute those who fought so hard against impossible odds to regain their homeland, and, freedom!! Doc Mike USN

@andyrob3259

2 жыл бұрын

Must have taken a lot of bravery and sacrifice of many men to shave the hair of woman to humiliate them meanwhile the entire country collaborated and not much happened to them .

with more 540 000 soldiers ( more the english army ) all the french maquisards engaged in the army like my father every man who wanted the end of the war got a battledress and a gun for to fight until the victory they met th russian army in ostereich

@johnwhite2576

Жыл бұрын

Alors, and on VE day they had ten divisions on German soil but those 500,00 French troops shortened the war by only a matter of weeks. At the time of the fall of Paris only three French divisions in Europe the Allies were virtually on the Siegfried line before French had forces that could move the needle. And in the decisive battle of the western front French effectivrr we lay sat out the bulge so let’s not get carried away before steaming “the sorrow and the pity” pond more time

@duanesarjec6887

Жыл бұрын

@@johnwhite2576 you forgot the french army from provence with the Dragoon operation in august 1944

Merci pour l'upload de ce film historique, comme t'as dit c'est un peu de propaganda mais très bien tourner. Et merci aussi pour le traduction. J'ai pas pu compris tout sans soustitres.

@Nettempereur

10 жыл бұрын

Merci beaucoup ! :)

very good video, shows how wrong the stereotypes about france in ww2 were. also thanks to the allies who helped us in ww2 🇫🇷🤝🇬🇧🤝🇺🇸 (couldnt find a USSR flag)

This is not highly propaganda this is mostly this is like a French version of a American documentary but without the shit in it and this shows the French side of the war which I really like and enjoy.

@DavidJGillCA

8 жыл бұрын

+POLICE SUCK CUL! 8888 It's you who are full of merde, it seems. You do such a good job of portraying the cliche of French chauvinism, ungratefulness and denial of the reality of French weakness. This bad attitude is a creation of those in France born after WWII; those who lived thru WWII in France have a very different, thankful, friendly admiring view of America's role in the war in Europe. The truth is France owed it's liberation to the USA. Despite Britain's determination and bold defense Britain could not have liberated France without assistance. France and the entire continent would have been at the will of the Soviet Union and the Soviets likely would have rolled into Paris as France's liberator. Wouldn't that have been fun...you could have be ungrateful to the Russians instead.

@ABPHistory

8 жыл бұрын

David J Gill Lol America hasn't done that much shit to France but they really did suck and they still do in the cold war they committed SOOOOOOOO many war crimes in Vietnam and Korea and Iraq & Iran along with the colonial area most French veterans are thankful they escaped to England or Spain and joined the Free French the French are proud of De Gaulle and you bombed a lot of our cities and the Free French helped you liberate the Alsace along with Strasbourg and Colmar you only helped in Metz also America could have saved France in 1940 if they declared war on Japan in 1937 when Japan invaded Indochina. Britain was a better ally

@ABPHistory

8 жыл бұрын

Tay Sachs agreed kinda

@brucemorlet8208

6 жыл бұрын

+Kommissar Squirrley - I don't know in which country or planet do you live man, but that would not be the same France as I do. Your comments are totally out of place. 1. Yes, USA, UK, and even the Ivans did a lot to us. 2. Did they simply want to help us or had to liberate France anyway so to attain their main goal? I like to believe maybe both, with an obvious preference for the second motive. So what ? This was war anyway ! Resources were limited and US resources seemed to be as limitless as good. Excellent gear, excellent support. 3. Also we didn't do exactly a clean work at Algeria war among others... how can we point fingers ? All of that does not take the merit out of our good French soldiers trying to save our honour side by side with our allies. I am glad today we are all friends and allies including our German friends.

My paternal grandmother had intermittent correspondence with her distant German cousins in Wuerttemberg (Felders of Stuttgart, Reutlingen, etc.). Friedrich Felder wrote to her, after the War, to describe the French soldiers in comparison to the Americans (the Americans assumed occupation over most of eastern Wuerttemberg after the French liberated it): (Letter dated 19th July, 1945): "We ourselves at Stuttgart were at first occupied by the French, because the foolish order to destroy the bridges over the Neckar hindered the Americans to enter into Stuttgart before the French came in from the other side [...see the French account of it beginning at 11:30 in this video ...]. After a few days, however, we came under American occupation. We are very glad of it, for though they are said to be proud and severe, at least they do not plunder. I must say, however, that we ourselves had nothing to suffer from the French. No foreign soldiers entered our house. Some Africans came to our house [...must have been the French Algerians or Moroccans mentioned at 11:44 ...] and asked for "schnapps" [liquor]; but disappeared at once when they heard that I had none; and when I spoke amicably to them in my broken French, they even shook hands with me." That was the experience from one German family in Stuttgart. Our family, here in America, sent them CARE packages (food, toiletries, cigarettes, etc.) for several years after the War.

@roisanglier34

2 жыл бұрын

Les Africains était souvent retiré de l'armée française car trop indisciplinés en voilà en corps la preuve après à cette époque la France et détruite alors que les Etats Unis sont au top du top pas étonnant la différence de traitement

@ardugaleen2231

2 жыл бұрын

@@roisanglier34 tu t'es battus toi? On t'a vu où ? Pourquoi tu parles en fait. Je comprends pas. Les soldats africains décrit ici se comportaient comme des anges en comparaisons à d'autres armées, et même eux avaient des raisons.

@retyan02

2 жыл бұрын

​@@ardugaleen2231 C'est vrai qu'il ne faut pas généraliser mais il y a eu plusieurs cas de viols commis par les troupes nord-africaines comme en Italie.

@ardugaleen2231

2 жыл бұрын

@@retyan02 ya eu des cas de viol commis par les americains en normandie, et ils sont plus nombreux. La guerre ça regroupe du monde, t'as beau dire n'importe quoi aux troupes y en aura toujours certains qui violeront, les chiffres sont beaucoup trops gros pour que le pourcentage n'existe pas. Même si 1 gars sur 1000 est un violeur ça fait 100 personnes avec une armée de 100 000 gars. Ajoute l'alcool les putes la barrière de la langue et le fait que en fin de guerre on recrutait n'importe qui... mais à coté t'en auras aussi qui seront correctes avec les civils (pour un vainqueur hein, faut pas déconner une petite bouteille de schnaps par ci par là ça fait plaisir) et même des héros dans le tas qui se feront tuer pour le pays. Et puis surtout le mec fait trop le gars classe avec son blaze, "le mousquetaire" et il lache des en corps au lien de encore. À un moment tu veux t'appeler le mousquetaire tu peux pas te permettre d'écrire comme un enfant de 9ans trisomique je sais pas.. J'ai 8 de moyenne en français mais je fais un effort bordel, même moi j'arrive à pas écrire "en corps".

@retyan02

2 жыл бұрын

@@ardugaleen2231 Le nombre de viols commis par les Etat-Uniens en France jusqu'à la fin de la guerre (11 mois) est estimé à 3 500 (estimation haute). En Italie les chiffres varient beaucoup, entre 2 000 et 7 000 viols par les troupes Coloniales et les Goumiers Marocains (pas que des Arabes donc) certains chiffres vont meme jusqu'à 30 000. Je suis d'accord avec toi, ce n'est certainement pas la majorité et faire une généralité comme Mousquetaire l'a fait c'est faire injure en y allant vite en besogne. Norman Naimark compare cependant l'attitude des troupes Franco-Marocaine à celle des Soviètiques...

C'est grâce à cinq hommes la France a pu rester une grande puissance mondiale : Le général de Gaulle et quatre maréchaux : Leclerc , join , delatre et kœing

@Heimrik01

2 жыл бұрын

Juin pas join, tu fumes trop ;-)

Prefer adrian helmet over M1, seeing french wearing US uniform with adrian is doped and giving distinctive vibe unlike those blanded leased american and british helmets.

Wonderful film! Thanks for resurrecting and sharing it with us. As a former US Army soldier, I found a bit amusing the choice of music they used during the victory parade in Berlin when US troops were parading by: Anchors Aweigh!! I doubt there were many US sailors in Berlin at that time! But it was probably what they had on hand at the time.

Merci ! I'm glad to see this film for the first time.

J'ai adoré le film. Bon de voir les réalisations des forces armées françaises.

Vive la france moi je dis

Vive la France!

Merci pour ces archives. Une vidéo sur la méconnue "invasion" française de septembre 39 serait également intéressante et très instructive

@Nettempereur

3 жыл бұрын

L'offensive de la Sarre ? Oui sans doute mais je renâcle un peu. Je suis un grand passionné d'Histoire, en particulier tout ce qui concerne l'Armée Française et je sais bien qu'il y a toujours des hauts et des bas, des victoires et des défaites, des gloires et des douleurs. Mais faire une vidéo sur l'offensive de la Sarre pour au fond donner de l'eau au moulin à tous les idiots (notamment du Net anglo-américain) qui nous injurient en disant que les Français étaient des lâches, ceci, cela, que s'ils avaient poussé l'attaque, l'Histoire aurait été très différente (ce qui est pourtant impossible à démontrer), etc... , finalement je m'en passe très bien. J'ai déjà suffisamment de quolibets, de blagues débiles à effacer ou auxquelles je dois répondre sur des vidéos de victoires claires et nettes comme celle-ci, je ne me sens pas trop de prêter davantage le flanc aux attaques de ces trolls. Entre nous, il y a déjà quantité de documentaires/films/vidéos sur la bataille de France 1939-1940 dans toutes les langues possibles et imaginables pour nous expliquer par A+B pourquoi la Wehrmacht a écrasé les armées alliées. Du coup, je me consacre plutôt sur un sujet complètement dédaigné par ces mêmes documentaires/films/vidéos, la France Libre puis l'Armée de la Libération. Au moins ça, je suis certain que ces idiots n'en ont jamais entendu parler et je les sors de leur zone de confort. N'oubliez pas que j'ai créé Nettempereur il y a douze ans en réaction à un "french bashing" qui régnait en maître sur KZread à l'époque. C'est d'ailleurs pourquoi pratiquement tout est traduit en anglais car c'est eux que je veux instruire en priorité (je reste très content bien sûr qu'une bonne partie de mon audience soit francophone, nous devons tous connaître l'Histoire de notre France, surtout si c'est notre pays). Avec quelques amis et compagnons de route, je crois que nous avons construit une réponse assez efficace face au "french bashing", avec nos moyens limités. Bien évidemment, les trolls n'ont pas disparu, les blagues restent nombreuses mais c'est moins fréquent qu'avant et il y a beaucoup plus de gens (français ou étrangers) qui remettent les points sur les i en rappelant les vrais faits et en tordant le coup aux légendes urbaines : par exemple, rappeler que la Légion étrangère n'est pas interdite aux Français, ils doivent seulement prendre une identité d'emprunt, ce qui fut longtemps aussi obligatoire pour les étrangers ; ou alors signaler que les troupes coloniales en 14-18 ne représentaient pas plus de 5% des troupes mobilisées et que leur taux de mortalité était inférieur à celui des troupes métropolitaines alors qu'ils sont présentés parfois comme de la chair à canon pour des Français trop peureux de se battre. Si nous ne rappelons pas notre Histoire, avec de vraies sources, de vrais faits, si nous ne rendons pas les coups, d'autres se chargeront de raconter n'importe quoi sur notre passé afin de nous salir.

@geekdaddy5351

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur merci pour votre réponse. Oui effectivement, je comprend. (J'aurai pu y réfléchir avant...) Une évocation de l'incroyable "coup de main du 14 juillet 1918" pour lequel je n'ai pas trouvé de vidéo (ou mail cherché...) remplirait peut être mieux l'objectif : audace, bravoure, réussite. L'idée notamment d'entourer le commando par une pluie d'obus suivant leur déplacement m'avait paru d'une audace incroyable. J'en avais entendu parler comme d'une des premières opérations commando moderne initiant un besoin qui sera comblé par les SAS et autres "forces spéciales" (Une histoire invraisemblable de prise d'une base ennemi située en altitude durant la campagne d'Alexandre le Grand après une escalade de plusieurs jours d'une paroi verticale montre que l'idée des commandos doit être aussi vieux que la guerre) Évidemment, la dualité du principal acteur (Darnan) laisse un trouble qui ternit à juste titre le tableau du héros. Ceci étant dit, merci pour votre travail et vos vidéos. 👍

@Nettempereur

3 жыл бұрын

@@geekdaddy5351 Oui j'y ai déjà pensé, il existe un reportage de RMC Découverte qui en parle (voici le lien : kzread.info/dash/bejne/gWZm07CYd9medNI.html ). Je ne suis pas un grand fan des documentaires de cette chaîne mais je ne connais pas d'autres œuvres vidéos de ce calibre qui parle de cet épisode impressionnant et si j'ai un peu de temps, ce pourrait être une traduction. Le fait que le principal artisan de ce coup soit Joseph Darnand ne me pose pas de souci, on n'efface pas le passé. On ne peut pas comprendre pourquoi les Français se sont tournés vers le maréchal Pétain en 1940 si on ne comprend pas la gloire qui était la sienne parmi la population jusqu'alors. De même, il faut comprendre qui était Darnand, héros en 14-18 (l'un des trois nommés "Artisan de la Victoire"), à nouveau décoré pendant la campagne 1939-1490 et dont Georges Bernanos dira après la Libération : « s’il y avait eu plus de Darnand en 1940, il n’y aurait pas eu de miliciens en 1944 » (Source : Dominique Venner, Histoire de la Collaboration, Pygmalion, 2000, p. 84). C'est aussi un moyen d'évoquer les Corps Francs de l'Armée Française (entre 1870 et 1940 en particulier, lorsque les Corps qui existaient depuis plusieurs siècles déjà ont commencé à prendre peu à peu la forme de ce qui deviendra les Commandos de la Seconde Guerre Mondiale). Merci beaucoup pour votre soutien !

Mon père était dans la deuxième DB de Delattre de Tassigny. Il a été partout. Il n'avait que 17 ans. En récompense, il était sur le premier char à défiler le premier 14 juillet après la guerre. Il m'a dit n'avoir jamais vu aucun Américain pendant la guerre. Par contre, ils ont bombardés Biarritz tuant environ 130 civils et très peu d'Allemands. Tout comme en Normandie où ont été tués plus d'habitants que d'Allemands. N'oublions pas le pillage et les viols commis en France par les Américains en 1945. Aucun pays n'est parfait. Vive la France!

Check this 14:27 , French Flag in Germany. Konstanz 17:50. Berlin 19:17

viva francia,,,,,

Very good, thanks for posting

Man this old fashion music can still make you pumped

Nettempereur, merci beaucoup pour tout le travail que vous réalisez depuis toutes ces années, de tenir bond, de répondre avec tact, humour et intelligence en présentant les vérités historiques face à tant d'inepties. Vous mettez en avant l'histoire de nos soldats, de leur ténacité, de leur abnégation et de leur sacrifice. Ils ne sont ainsi pas oubliés! Quant à nos soldats d'aujourd'hui, ils sont mieux connus dans leurs actions. Avec tout votre respect, je n'hésite pas à présenter votre chaine dans les commentaires de vidéos anglo-saxonnes où des personnes (qui méconnaissent notre histoire miliaire et notre histoire tout court!) remettent en question les actions passées de nos soldats. Certains publics anglo-saxons ont ainsi pu la découvrir! Nous sommes peut-être une goutte d'eau francophone dans un océan anglophone (même si je n'ai rien contre ce dernier) mais grâce au noyau dont vous faites partie avec d'autres chaines comme la votre, la mémoire de nos soldats est préservée! Encore merci!

@Nettempereur

3 жыл бұрын

Merci beaucoup pour votre soutien !

@ahceneaissani846

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur merci grâce à t'es vidéos je fais taire les rageux 💪✔️🤗

@bleachigo783

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur j'ai quelque chose à te demander

@Nettempereur

3 жыл бұрын

@@bleachigo783 De la part d'une chaîne qui est officiellement là pour troller, je crains le pire ^^ Allez-y, posez votre question.

@bleachigo783

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur 😭

If the French military had the officers and leaders in 1940 that they had it would have been a different Battle of France

@titcab8159

8 ай бұрын

Yeah maybe they would’ve won or slow down German troops so reinforcements can come

Merci pour cette video.

Très belle vidéo. Mon papa était engagé volontaire dans cette armée, après la libération de son village meusien en septembre 44 par les Américains et il a fait toute la campagne des Vosges, d'Alsace et d'Allemagne. Il est resté en occupation dans la Zone Française d'occupation pendant plusieurs années. C'est bien que les jeunes Français et les autres aient connaissance de cette saga.

vive la france

Excellent !

I see some have American M1 helmets and some have the traditional French helmets does anyone know who was equipped with what?

@Nettempereur

6 жыл бұрын

It depends. What I will tell you is probably correct but I cannot be sure. Let's see the composition of the French Army in 1945: - If we exclude the French SAS and French naval commandos (Commando Kieffer) who were in the British military, the French soldiers who arrived in Normandy belonged to the 2nd Armored Division (2e DB). Completely equipped by the Americans in early 1944. - The FFI (French Forces of the Interior, gathering all of the resistance's armed groups) were first in civilians, some were former 1939 army troops and had some parts of the uniforms of that time (most likely only the helmet) and some were progressively armed by the US while they joined the French army conquering Eastern France and Germany. Consequently, the uniforms of the FFI could be quite heteroclit. - The bulk of the French forces came from the Armée d'Afrique: French forces and colonial troops of French North Africa. We should add the 20,000 Free French who joined the army under de Gaulle between 1940 and November 1942 and the troops from the rest of the French Empire (excluding Indochina). Most of all these troops were completely reequipped by the Americans during the year 1943. The only exception was the Moroccan Goumiers who had a British helmet but still their long clothes. So, most of the French troops (like my grand-father) who participated in the Campaign of Italy, in the Liberation of Corsica and Elba, and in the landing in Southern France were equipped by the US. All of France's industry was held by the Germans, there were nothing or so little in Algeria to equip an army. So, the guy you see in 1940 uniforms was most likely a former FFI, he seems young anyway. All the troops and vehicles of this video are 99% US equipments.

@antiochusiiithegreat7721

6 жыл бұрын

Nettempereur Interesting I know most of 2nd armoured Blindee was equipped mostly with American equipment. I didn't know if this was just heavy equipment like halftracks and tanks or everything from rifles to uniforms.

@Nettempereur

6 жыл бұрын

My friend thecajun cutthroat made an interesting video about the 2e DB. You will see the differences between the "African period" (1940-early 1943) and after. Enjoy :) kzread.info/dash/bejne/lZWVucWPgJeeYsY.html

@antiochusiiithegreat7721

6 жыл бұрын

Nettempereur Thanks

The Free French army had over 1 million men it was the fourth largest allied army. As shown here they were bad men and fierce fighters the Germans were well advised to fear them.

@navarro4238

5 жыл бұрын

Before 1943 : French resistance from the inside:500 000 men. French resistance from the outside:80 000 men. After 1943: Liberation Army:1500 000 men ------------------------------------------------------ collaboration: French militia:10 000 men (one of the lowest rates in occupied Europe for example, the Polish had 12,333 militiamen while Poland was reputed to be one of the countries with the highest rate of resistance). SS (Frankreich and Charlemagne):8000 men. Infographic of the Second World War edited by Perrin.

@teamdoge8917

5 жыл бұрын

@@navarro4238 Dis moi, la question peut paraître idiote mais est-ce que c'est toi qui a un compte instagram où tu portes un chapeau similaire à celui de Napoléon? Sous des publlications anti françaises ce dernier publiait un message similaire c'est pourquoi je le pose la question. En tout cas bonne continuation.

@navarro4238

5 жыл бұрын

@@teamdoge8917 C'est tout à fait possible ! Je poste souvent ce message sous des publications de French Bashing à propos de la ww2 sur Instagram. Ma photo de profil représente Turenne sur un cheval en compagnie d'un char de l'armée Rhin Danube ! :)

11:23 :le général de Montsabert , discret et efficace.

French North African colonial troops, who would mostly be Muslims, helping liberate Europe.

@Nettempereur

6 жыл бұрын

Free French (overwhelmingly white Europeans), French settlers in colonies, especially Algeria (White Europeans -including my grandfather - and Sefarad Jews), French Foreign Legion (mostly Europeans), Arab colonial troops from French North Africa (muslims), Black colonial troops from Western, central Africa, Djibouti, Madagascar, Indian Ocean islands (muslims, christians, animists), colonial troops from the French possessions in the Pacific ocean (Christians or other religion). When the Free French Army landed in Provence, the rate of colonial troops was still around 50%. By the time of the events related to this video, the colonial troops were a minority because of the integration in the military of the French Forces of the Interior (the gathering of all armed groups of the French Resistance which had contributed in the Liberation of France). So, it is not correct to claim that all these troops were either North African colonial troops or muslims (although they were still a good part). Even in the colonial troops, you had a large diversity of origins and religions.

@adrianjackson2696

6 жыл бұрын

i was referring to THIS FILM which mentions regiments and divisions from colonial Algeria and Morocco. Some units are even named. Many soldiers were wearing Muslim type cloth colonial head wear when not wearing steel helmets (both French and US types) and a Fez (hat) like the soldier given a medal near the end of the film. Vichy French and Foreign Legion troops were defeated/captures in Syria/Lebanon in a month of so by Australian 7th Division earlier in WW2 too.

@Nettempereur

6 жыл бұрын

Be careful, when we say "3rd Algerian Division", it does not mean at all that troops were from native muslim population. Even in Tirailleurs regiments (where muslims were a majority), you had white people, not only the officers. And a contrario, in this division you had also the 7th African Chasseur Regiment which was almost completely composed of White Europeans or of Sefarad Jews. French colonial troops were dual: you had the "white" colonial troops (mostly drawn from Metropolitan France, French settlers, Sefarad Jews and Foreign Legionnaires) which include the Chasseurs d'Afrique, the Zouaves, the Légion and the Bataillons d'infanterie légère d'Afrique. And you had the "native" colonial troops (mostly drawn from Arab or Black African people but also a minority of white French, plus most of the officers) which include the Goumiers, the Tirailleurs, the Spahis, the Compagnies Sahariennes, etc... Yes, the men you saw in traditionnal clothes were most probably Moroccan. Huuhh, the Vichy army was completely in disarray, underequipped and demotivated. The Vichy garisson in Syria-Lebanon could only put a fight for honour but they did not have the men, the weapons, the means nor the will to fight so far from home. Most of what they had were from WW1. I mean, if the Australian Division could not have beaten such a depleted opposing force, there was no way to send them against German forces in Europe or the Japanese in Asia. By the way, the Free French participated in the conquest of Syria-Lebanon, there were Legionnaires on both sides, I believe it is the only occasion in History.

@adrianjackson2696

2 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur Part of the 7th Australian Division quickly beat the Vichy French in Lebanon in a month or so during WW2, including Foreign Legion soldiers.

@Nettempereur

2 жыл бұрын

@@adrianjackson2696 I already answered that point : the Vichy army in Syria-Lebanon was completely in disarray, under-equipped and demotivated. The Vichy garrison in Syria-Lebanon could only put a fight for honour but they did not have the men, the weapons, the means nor the will to fight so far from home. Most of what they had were from WW1. I mean, if the Australian Division could not have beaten such a depleted opposing force, there was no way to send them against German forces in Europe or the Japanese in Asia. By the way, the Free French participated in the conquest of Syria-Lebanon, there were Legionnaires on both sides, I believe it is the only occasion in History.

Kehlsteinhaus ou Nid d'Aigle pris par la 2e division blindée française, Georges Buis et Paul Repiton-Préneuf, auraient été présents dès la nuit du 4 au 5 mai, et auraient dû partir le 10 sur demande du commandement américain, après avoir pris de nombreuses photographies...Ce que la série "Band of Brothers" ne dit pas, au contraire c'est que les forces US sont arrivées le 10 mai !

@ph390

3 жыл бұрын

propagande us... toujours cacher la vérité..les français ont été les premiers .. mais ce n est pas la seule histoire réécrite par les alliés.. il t en a d autres ...Mont Cassino par exemple...

BRAVO et vive la France !!!

France is the best.

Le Clerc!

@jeromenesa5337

5 жыл бұрын

Leclerc !

Why did it seem that the French cameramen were mostly embedded with the Americans?

@Nettempereur

5 жыл бұрын

The Free French in 1945 wore US equipment. These are not American soldiers.

Bien dit !

+1 :)

JFK'S Secretary of State, Dean Rusk, was in France in the early 60's when DeGaulle decided to pull out of NATO. DeGaulle said he wanted all US military out of France as soon as possible. Rusk responded, "Does that include those who are buried here?" DeGaulle did not respond. You could have heard a pin drop; no further comments needed.

@Nettempereur

9 жыл бұрын

France did not want to be the puppet of the US. Is it wrong to have the will to be independent, sovereign and self-suficient? Just answer me, why should have De Gaulle forgiven the way he had been mistreated by the Allies during WW2, forgiven the US betrayal during the Suez Crisis and forgiven the tight US grasp on European affairs in the 50s, 60s? Sorry to be some disobeying slaves.

@bobamericana3099

9 жыл бұрын

Nettempereur DEGALLE WAS A SOCIALIST SO HE PREFERRED TO NOT BE IDENTIFIED AS LEANING TOWARD THE WEST AND CAPITOLISM BY HIS PEERS-PLUS HE WASNT MISHANDLED BY THE USA-WE PROPPED HIM UP AND RECOGNIZED HIS"GOVERNMENT" WHEN HE WAS IN EXILE-YES EXILE-IN BRITON-soory for caps

@Nettempereur

9 жыл бұрын

Bob Sparticus - De Gaulle was never a socialist and was not against capitalism (dirigism is a form of capitalism, there is not only ultra-right liberalism). - The USA did not want to support De Gaulle, Roosevelt hated him, believing he was a to-be-dictator. He supported anyone who could oppose De Gaulle (Giraud, Darlan and even Pétain ! Admiral Leahy who advised Roosevelt thought Pétain could reunite the French after the Liberation rather than De Gaulle). They also did not tell De Gaulle about D-Day and kept him away of almost every initiatives. - Check AMGOT, check the US Franc currency, check all this. De Gaulle fought hard to avoid a post-war American occupation and administration of France. - The US recognized De Gaulle in late 1944, when it was clear the French people wanted none but him. You better learn a History Book !

@jpm1151

9 жыл бұрын

Bob Sparticus This is perfectly true; Rooselveld did hate De Gaulle to the extend that he choose a Vichy Admiral as interlocutor when the US troops landed in Morocco. He even had fake French banknotes printed to provide his troops after overlord. he wanted to place France under US administration. Luckily for him; he quickly realized that it wasn't going to work. For the NATO episode; USA wanted to give directives to France about the nuclear deterrent program; De Gaulle could not stand that. Who would have ?

@bobamericana3099

9 жыл бұрын

Jpm Da Gaulle was a blo hard- the americans liberated Paris and moved on, Ike let on division of american troops be available for the liberation parade,, that french bastard da gualle claimed he liberated paris,,, what a fucking asshole

Génial !!! :)

Bombastic? No, deserving. What happened after this for many years, both in actions and words of various leaders of France, that may be called bombastic and unnecessary. The writer and narrator were spot on.

Il avait 60% de soldats coloniaux dans les rangs de l'armée française libre

@Nettempereur

5 жыл бұрын

60%, ça c'est un chiffre qui correspond à la réalité durant la campagne d'Italie mais pas pour les faits relatés dans cette vidéo. Avec l'intégration des FFI dans l'armée régulière à la fin de l'année 1944, les coloniaux sont devenus minoritaires, d'autant qu'ils avaient deux années de guerre dans les pattes, certaines unités qui avaient bien servi leur pays ont reçu congé heureusement. Et n'oubliez pas que dans l'Armée d'Afrique et dans les Troupes Coloniales, il y avait aussi des Blancs ! Même dans les goumiers, dans les régiments de Tirailleurs, pas seulement les officiers mais dans les encadrements, les sous-off. Donc attention de ne pas faire trop de raccourcis.

@farglory7715

5 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur je le savais déjà

@navarro4238

5 жыл бұрын

Il y avait 59 pourcent de soldats Français libre dans la 1DFL. Les 30 autres pourcent viennent de l'empire , N'oublions pas qui s'agissait de 20 % de pied Noirs donc des colons Français , des soldats d'outre mer donc aujourd'hui département Français et des Harkis pro Français qui seront massacres lors des guerres d'indépendance .

@gringologie9302

4 жыл бұрын

Au moment des évènements d'Italie oui, à peu près 60% des régiments présents étaient des regiments coloniaux mais attention ; à l'époque la plupart des régiments de marine étaient des régiments coloniaux, tout comme les régiments français présents dans les colonies. Ça ne veut donc pas dire qu'à peu près 60% des soldats étaient des nord africains ou des noirs africains.

Vive la France. U.K. Australia, India, Canada, N.Z. South Africa and USA. If I have missed any I apologise! We owe a great debt of gratitude!

And after all this disaster of ww2 France and germany with 4 others nations had decided to create the european union ! Incredible isn't it ?

@ardugaleen2231

2 жыл бұрын

True brother, it's sad that it works so badly. But the spirit was there! Germany evolved a lot and mentalities changed after this war

The French have a mixed record in World War II. On the one hand they fought bravely at the outset of the war and after the Allied invasion on D-Day. However, during most of the war--from the cowardly and defeatist surrender by Petain, as well as the active collaboration of the Vichy French government in participating in the Holocaust as well as other war crimes--France has a morally stained record.

@Nettempereur

5 жыл бұрын

Most French were not involved in either the resistance or the collaboration. Most were struggling against the harsh conditions of the occupation and those in urban areas were even short of food, coal and electricity. They could not drive anymore (no gas). Most companies' production were to be sent to Germany. You have to figure out what an armed occupation means : you don't have the freedom to choose. Either you obey or you fight back (with the risk of death for you and your family, and not a quick and painless one). Some fought, well before the D-DAY either in the Resistance or in the Free French. Others, a little minority, decided to collaborate willingly for ideological reasons or for some gains of wealth or power. They had to bear this responsability for their crimes. Why should France be responsible for their actions ? There was quite a debate after the war, even legally, about the question which government was legitimate during WW2, either de Gaulle's Free France in London then Algiers or the Vichy Regime. We are not going to settle this debate today. But if we speak statistically, the majority of French people were neither of them. They were struggling to find food while shops were short of everything.

@navarro4238

5 жыл бұрын

Before 1943 : French resistance from the inside:500 000 men. French resistance from the outside:80 000 men. After 1943: Liberation Army:1500 000 men ------------------------------------------------------ collaboration: French militia:10 000 men (one of the lowest rates in occupied Europe for example, the Polish had 12,333 militiamen while Poland was reputed to be one of the countries with the highest rate of resistance). SS (Frankreich and Charlemagne):8000 men. Infographic of the Second World War edited by Perrin.

France freed the US from the UK at Yorktown , French freed Paris . when UK sunk french navy , it was a hard sell to support the UK to many French , french blood added in victory ,no more needed to be added

@davidjackson6152

5 жыл бұрын

They certainly played a role but to say France freed America from England is foolish.

@anonymousanonymous6657

4 жыл бұрын

@@davidjackson6152 they helped...

@davidjackson6152

4 жыл бұрын

@@anonymousanonymous6657 No doubt.

@davidjackson6152

4 жыл бұрын

@@iteachyou1575 You should read a bit more. No offence but we had plenty of muskets, and captured cannons and powder. Concerning Yorktown, the Americans had it surrounded and were beginning to shell it day and night. France's navy arrived nearly too late to help and didnt stay long enough to be of any real consequence. Typical. The only real help they gave was political in nature. Recognizing America as a free and sovereign nation was by far France's biggest contribution.

@davidjackson6152

4 жыл бұрын

@@iteachyou1575 Washington, Lafayette and Rochambeau were already digging in around Yorktown by the time DeGrasse and the French fleet arrived. The British challenged French control of the Bay but lost the battle. Cornwallis surrendered a month and a half later. Check your dates and sequences again. The French navy arrived AFTER the Continental Army. I will concede that France supplied more arms and material than I had previously thought. Save for a few individuals, French troops contributed VERY little. I stand by my original statement. Recognition of the American nation was France's main contribution, and the one that helped the most. I am not in any way being unappreciative, but to say the war could not have been won without them is untrue.

We are the best of Europe since 1000 years HEHE? We are big boss Long live FRANCE !

20:30 ....Yes, I'm sure the U.S. Army really loved it when the French propaganda film editors inserted the NAVY's "Anchors Away!" tune to accompany their march-past scenes in the Berlin victory parade!

@Nettempereur

6 жыл бұрын

lol nice point haha

Excelente documentário \1

@ricardos.cabral8409

4 жыл бұрын

Muito bom documentário !

French and colonial soldiers using American weapons and training.No disrespect.

@Nettempereur

10 жыл бұрын

Indeed, especially for weapons and it was still true in the Indochina war and a still a bit during the Algerian war. France was a mount of ashes in 1945, we needed twenty years to build an industry again. Are you that surprized? :)

@RebelSonBand

10 жыл бұрын

I see US helmets,British helmets,French Adrian helmets too-....

@Nettempereur

10 жыл бұрын

Infidel That's normal. The French army was totally reequiped by the US after the liberation of North Africa. I was even surprised to see Adrian helmets again. The British helmets you saw belonged most probably to Moroccan soldiers.

@occi31

6 жыл бұрын

So? Americans were using French equipment and weapons during their war of independence and during ww1. No disrespect

@baptistedarnand9002

5 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur tu exagère la France n'était pas une montagne de cendre en 1945 des usines avait était détruit mais ils nous restaient l’essentiel

La revanche de 1940 est t'arriver!🔥💥

@xaliktelhas3058

Жыл бұрын

and still germany won more wars against france

@barukiv2943

7 ай бұрын

​@@xaliktelhas3058France won ww1 and WW2 against Germany and Germany won only franco-prussian war.

VIVE LA FRANCE 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🤜🇩🇪

Je suis le premier super et super vidéo aussi !

Russia was in Germany before any allies

@Arthur-eg2pg

5 жыл бұрын

No for exemple french drop bomb in berlin in 1939 french is the first country to attack germany

@jeromenesa5337

5 жыл бұрын

Oui on sait la russie est toujours plus flrte que tous les autres pays.😂 Faut dire aussi qu elle la seule a avoir passer un accord ribentropp - molotof avec les nazis.!!

@jeromenesa5337

5 жыл бұрын

Leo schinas: First dont forget ribentrop- molotov accord !!

THE SOVIET UNION WINNER OF WWII.

@joycenorment4720

6 жыл бұрын

No they were not no only players involved in WW2 If, you remember your history? Stalin only seek out assistance from UK and USA with his tail between his but after Hilter invaded him!!! He even experienced 3-4 days of total isolation and withdrawal from his terrified generals and the world ! Instead of firing those that don’t demonstrate their total allegiances to him ! he either immediately kill them or torture them them !! Similar issues with dominating with inflicting fear upon others even close family members were fearful of their lives. Don’t forget Stalin had his own killed after, returning as back home as a POW !!! Although, Trump is unable to Inflict those types of death punishments he does fire his cabinet members previously, selected from himself! and me and total devotion without questions as Hitler and Stalin did !! I was pleasantly, impressed to hear that in 2010 A military parade was conducted,!taken place with many ally countries and those who fought from previously, invaded countries either Poland or French to join their allies to fight with Russians, Uk and French. The Parade was Orchestrated by Putin / his request allied Troops!!’ Of course many of remaining troops representing the countries that fought were dead. Therefore, the practicing,, military forces today went into Russia in their place. I believed that was the only yr the parades in 2010. Some of Russia’s retirees from WW2 standing alongside outside parade routes, expressed disfavor with the allied forces participating, in parades ! However, many communicated welcoming the other countries!! This, I believe was only time that other contributing allies were invited to the victory march for World War II parade !!😊

@Crashed131963

6 жыл бұрын

Russia won the battle of Moscow before the US was even in the war. Even if D-Day failed or did not happen Russia at this time had 2.3 million troops wiping out the remaining 700,000 Germans of Army Group Center in Operation Bagration . Russia was heading to Berlin ,D-Day or not after Kursk.

@fulse1856

5 жыл бұрын

21 billions killed, it's not a really win

@ph390

3 жыл бұрын

yes we can say that .. even if the comments here apply the beautiful anglo american propaganda ... because in fact 70% of the nazi troops were on the eastern front not in front of the anglo americans ... and despite that, the anglo americans with their overwhelming material superiority have had a hard time defeating and suffered great losses .. yes as a Frenchman I say thank the USSR too

It is funny that at the end they played Anchors Aweigh while showing the the US Army going by.

Très diversifié niveau matos

Vive la France! I mean, I'll have the quiche please.

French invasion of Germany?Lol,more likely American-British helped French invasion of Germany.

@Nettempereur

4 жыл бұрын

Why ? It's an allied invasion. Obviously in 1945, the Americans and the British bore the largest efforts in the West (you clearly see that French troops have US equipement). And nobody says that it is a Soviet helped American-British-French invasion of Germany, do they ?

@antoine4278

4 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur (quand ils répondent pas c'est qu'ils ont honte ou aucun arguments)

@ph390

4 жыл бұрын

English..??? as in 1940 .... ??? lool .. and the usa ?? but where were they at that time .. ?? in 1939/1940 ?? lool

France: Oh how the tables turned...

Viva a França. São Paulo. Brasil.

This video with its offensive language illustrates perfectly well who was the real source of 2 world wars. French hunger for hegemony in Europe was satisfied n the back of Germans since Louis XVI. occupied ethnic German territory. Since than, for centuries until 1871 France kept the small German territories under its whip. Thanks to Prussia, Germans found back to themselves and united against French aggression. The 1. World War was the fruit of the French being keen on revenge. The humiliating dictate of Versailles 1919 was the ideal soil for the NSDAP to plant the seeds of totalitarian regime in Germany. Everybody should see this French video. You learn a lot about their hate and venom.

@Nettempereur

6 жыл бұрын

LoL, and of course, the Germans had no cause in the two world wars. The Germans had no hunger for hegemony in Europe. So funny of you. About the Treaty of Versailles, you are gravely mistaken. One of my friend made this video, please watch it. kzread.info/dash/bejne/hKd-0cSgXcXIZqg.html

@ph390

5 жыл бұрын

I do not know your nationality but you seem mainly an anti-French ... you hide behind a speudo .... in fact you have a big mouth but you do not piss away .. the real problem is that the rivalry between nation does not date from the year 1800 .. before that, spain, england, france, russia, prussia and others it is always opposed to be the power n ° 1 ... the fact is that france has made a revolution anti-royalist and that it is found isolated face to the hypocritical monarchy ... but in the end France won because the monarchy was abolished in Europe ... or so are paper monarchies ... as in England, Spain, Belgium ..... proud to be French and its history

Not One French Tank, Not One French Truck, Not One French Made Uniform...

@Nettempereur

9 жыл бұрын

A few Adrian helmets anyway. And so what? The soldiers were French or from French colonies. No matter the equipment, these are the men who matter. British-equipped Polish forces are not accounted as Polish, according to you?

@marseillais2687

9 жыл бұрын

BigBossManBBQ I saw a few Adrian helmets. And as for uniforms, the French did happen to produce some great coats for their troops, but the helmets just weren't being produced, so it was hard to rearm troops without factories to make them. As for tanks, they were used a fair amount, both by Free French and the Resistance of the Interior, just not for the invasion of Germany, rather, they were used for the Liberation of France.

@ABPHistory

8 жыл бұрын

+BigBossManBBQ French colonial troops had French/French Northern African equipment well not tanks and trucks and yet it does not matter.

@fulse1856

5 жыл бұрын

Because, 100 % of French stuff was exiled in Deutschland.

@jacquesdutronc2034

5 жыл бұрын

German used French materiel and soviets etc too, the Germans was taken all French vehicle in 1940

France best troops were lost early due to split government.You could have best troops on earth ,but if your nation is binding their hands or not supplying them properly,squandered their finest and most experienced early.ECONOMIC WOES caused early trouble for France but they dont get enough credit for fighting with NOTHING but empty rifles and no fuel.

Because american and BBC movies about WW2 aren't propaganda ?

Vive l'Armée Française !

Wonderful!!!

rip to the moroccans in front of this battle

What did the French have against the city of Stuttgart?

@Nettempereur

3 жыл бұрын

Because of what was nicknamed "Radio-Stuttgart", a French-speaking radio broadcast which promoted Nazi ideology even before WW2. Read the Wikipedia biography of Paul Ferdonnet : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Ferdonnet

ahh yes the mighty Le Sherman tank!

@ 4:02 I thought the tank said MARSOC 😂

@Nettempereur

5 жыл бұрын

Maroc, French name for Morocco ;)

Removing a historical video has no sense. But you are right on Israel. Anyway, it's changing cause US, french and UK recieved a big lesson from Russia an Iran on syrian conflict. Netanyahu feels lonely, so lonely he has to say iranians aren't free cause they don't wear jeans and don't listen to occidental music. hahahahahahahahaha They wear jeans, and if they don't listen to occidental music...well they're right cause actually occidental music is bullshit. Decandency, that's what happening here

@davidjackson6152

5 жыл бұрын

Iranians arent free in any sense of the word.

It was surely not a "french invasion", but the armed collaboration with the second DB, (by General Leclerc, and called "Free French" troops, who didn't capitulate or surrend in 1940), and the US and UK troops, and who advanced and fought with them through Africa, Italy (Monte Cassino ...), Corsica, France (participating of the DDay and Provence landing) and finally Germany.

@Nettempereur

4 жыл бұрын

French troops you see there are probably not the 2nd DB you talk about. These belonged to the French First Army, a merging of Free French Forces and French Army in Africa (who had joined the Allies in November 1942) and, as you said, who fought in Italy, Corsica, Provence and all. The 2nd DB was sent to England, landed in Utah Beach on August 1, participated in the Normandy Campaign, Paris, eastern France, a bit of South-Western France then Germany to Berchtesgaden.

@jansolo55

4 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur Yes, you're right, but the entire story is a little bit more complicated. The Provence landing was under command of general De Lattre de Tassigny. However, his army was an extension of the original 2e DB, which was born in Koufra (Africa) at 1941 under command of Leclerc.

@kurochigo

4 ай бұрын

France never surrendered nor capitulated buffoon. It was a ceasefire.

all the movies was propagandas but the french army got Vienna and the south of the germany in december the french army had more soldiers than the UK . de Gaulle won , in june 40 he had only only 200

@paulmcewen

3 жыл бұрын

And just remember it was the Americans that rearmed the defeated Nation France. The Vichy French sided with Hitler and the Germans had a Waffen SS regiment all Frenchmen that fought for Hitler on the Russian front ☠️

It's easy to win a beaten enemy when americans and brits just saved your ass

@Nettempereur

6 жыл бұрын

The Germans were not ready to lay down their weapons easily. The campaign of Germany was still bloody and tough. And besides, these men you see are either from the Leclerc division (sent to Normandy on August 1st 1944 and which made all the campaign. Before, had fought in Africa since 1940 !) or from the Army of the Liberation (mostly the Army of Africa), landed on Provence after having fought in Italy and Corsica. They did their job, not just at the end. So your comment is just the mark of your ignorance on Free French campaigns. Please, watch all my WW2-related videos disclosed in the description of this video.

@Nettempereur

6 жыл бұрын

During the campaign of Italy, they were 70% indeed but not during the events shown in this video, they were below 50% by this time. And the speaker talked a lot about it, you would know it if you had actually watched the video. "Division coloniale", "division algérienne", "division marocaine", there is no doubt. And yes, Moroccan goumiers did some war crimes in Italy, like the US military in France, like the Soviet army in Germany, these things happen in war, this is not a funny game, I know it. About attacking someone under invasion, Italians should give us some lessons. If I remember well, you attacked France in 1940 when the Germans were marching on Paris. Stabbing in the back of his neighbour, I guess you can talk about this matter. At least, the French army participated in the invasion of Germany, they did not just come when things were done like you had done in 1940. And yet, you still lost in the Alps, like you lost in Greece, in Egypt and in Ethiopia.

@gianfrancow2850

6 жыл бұрын

You know that when Italy attacked, France was already on the verge to surrender, so it's not Italy's fault if you were beaten. Attacking fortesses over the Alps is just fooling around to sit at the winner's table, and that's what Mussolini wanted, a couple thousand of deads to sit along with Hitler. Still they took Menton isn't it? Italy fought for three years over three continents with a scrapped army, while France lasted a month with its full potential. And I laugh because Italian partisans and antifascist brigades also fought the Nazis and freed entire cities by themselves, and southern Italy fought along with Americans from 1943 till the end of the war. But we basically started on the wrong side, and that's how we lost, you were on the better side and that's how you won.

@Nettempereur

6 жыл бұрын

No, as you said, it was not Italy's fault if France surrendered. But in comparison, you blame the French with invading Germany but Germany was not defeated yet. What should you say about Italian troops then ? Indeed, Mussolini cynically sacrificed Italian lives because he wanted to seize French Riviera, Corsica, Tunisia and Egypt. Italians suffered much in his hands. France fought in Africa, in Middle East, in the sky and on the seas with a depleted army and no longer any industrial force. Then it participated in the campaign of Italy, the Liberation of France and the conquest of Germany and Austria. I have all my videos in the description, please take some time to watch them. Partisans were effective all around Europe. All south-western France was liberated by French FFI during the summer 1944. But the best were neither French nor Italians, Yugoslavian partisans were the best in this war.

@Crashed131963

6 жыл бұрын

Even if D-Day failed or did not happen Russia at this time had 2.3 million troops wiping out the remaining 700,000 Germans of Army Group Center in Operation Bagration . Russia was heading to Berlin ,D-Day or not.

Couldn't have said it better, nett.

Les tirailleurs sénégalais étaient monté a Berlin eux aussi ? (J'ai pas l'impression qu'on les voit)

@Nettempereur

4 жыл бұрын

C'est très probable mais ils ont été un peu moins nombreux car les tirailleurs sénégalais avaient commencé à être retirés des effectifs à partir de l'automne-hiver 1944 : 1) logique climatique d'abord. L'hiver approchait, les troupes alliées avançaient vers l'Alsace et l'Allemagne. Comme en 14-18, il a été décidé de mettre en retrait la majeure partie des troupes coloniales qui souffraient trop des hivers du nord de la France. 2) et en fait en 1944, elles ont été même en grande partie démobilisées. Il faut dire qu'elles avaient déjà suffisamment lutté : Tunisie, Italie, Corse puis de la Provence jusqu'à Colmar. Deux ans de guerre dans les pattes, ça use un homme et il faut savoir faire tourner les effectifs. Et pour les soldats noirs d'Afrique Centrale ou du Tchad, c'était encore pire car ils avaient rejoint de Gaulle dès 1940, ils avaient combattu dans la colonne Leclerc en Libye. Quatre ans de guerre pour certains, c'est énorme. 3) autre point, il est politique. Les mouvements de résistance ont constitué des groupes armés durant l'Occupation (connus vers la fin sous le nom de FFI). Beaucoup sont proches du Parti Communiste Français ou d'autres groupes radicaux de gauche. Ces milices armées étaient un grave danger pour l'ordre républicain (la Guerre d'Espagne n'a pas encore dix ans). De Gaulle a mené un bras de fer terrible avec les communistes pour que ces milices patriotiques soient dissoutes (il a dû accepter en échange le retour de Maurice Thorez, chef du PCF qui avait déserté en 1940). Il fallait absolument rétablir l'ordre et que ne subsistent plus que l'Armée et la Police dans le pays, au risque sinon de voir se former un état dans l'état. La démobilisation des troupes coloniales était un bon moyen pour les faire remplacer par ces FFI, forçant ainsi leur intégration dans l'Armée régulière pour mieux les contrôler. Dans le défilé à Berlin, ils sont même cités (le corps franc FFI Pommiès à 21:00). C'était des troupes fraîches, des gens qu'on espérait garder pour reconstituer l'armée métropolitaine (n'oubliez pas que l'Armée avait été réduite à 100 000 hommes en 1940 puis dissoute en 1942). Voilà, pour toutes ces raisons, pourquoi les tirailleurs sénégalais étaient moins nombreux pour la campagne d'Allemagne mais je vous confirme qu'ils en restaient encore. Pour le défilé de Berlin, je ne sais pas, mais déjà dans cette vidéo, dans le premier défilé en Autriche, vous pouvez voir des combattants nord-africains avec leurs mules.

@toutix9880

4 жыл бұрын

@@Nettempereur merci pour ta réponse détaillée !

@Nettempereur

4 жыл бұрын

@@toutix9880 De rien !

@JRos-qc6kw

4 жыл бұрын

Les troupes africaines en raison des conditions climatiques du nord est de la France, effectivement ont été retiré du front en Octobre 1944, mais certains ont été transféré et ont continué à combattre dans le sud-est de la France sur le front italien. (Histoire de la 1ère Armée française tome 1, Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny).

@Nettempereur

4 жыл бұрын

@@JRos-qc6kw Merci pour cette précision supplémentaire !

I live in Karlsruhe it is a beautiful city now...!!

@bleachigo783

3 жыл бұрын

Yes but destroyed in 1945

@info.901

3 жыл бұрын

@@bleachigo783 ..In who much time did France invaded Germany I mean the whole country?

@bleachigo783

3 жыл бұрын

@@info.901 In 1945 ?

@info.901

3 жыл бұрын

@@bleachigo783 ....was it french occupied Germany in 1945? Germany was under French roll?

@bleachigo783

3 жыл бұрын

@@info.901 After the first war and the Treaty of Versailles the allied powers (UK, France) had to occupy Germany but at the last minute the English authorities refused so the occupation was made later and only by France link to a site that will explain better to you: fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_de_la_Ruhr In 1945 the allied powers began the final battle, i.e. the invasion of Nazi Germany, In the North West were the English, in the middle the Americans and in the South the French in the East were the Soviets. German armistice took place on May 8, 1945 Germany is divided into 4 parts. I put you a link: fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campagne_d%27Allemagne_(1945)

La Francia ha perso la guerra con la Germania in venti giorni nel 1940.Poi gli Stati Uniti d'America e il Regno Unito hanno vinto anche per la Francia.

@Nettempereur

2 жыл бұрын

La Francia ha perso una battaglia nel 1940, nessuno lo nega. Ma i francesi continuarono a combattere o nella Resistenza o nelle Forze francesi libere del generale de Gaulle, o più tardi nell'Esercito di Liberazione quando il Nord Africa passò agli Alleati. Durante l'inverno del 1944-1945, gli uomini che vedete combattere hanno spesso combattuto dal 1942 e per alcuni dal 1940 o addirittura dal 1939. Naturalmente, non avrebbero potuto liberare la Francia e invadere la Germania senza gli americani e l'Impero britannico, ma penso che fosse importante mostrare che quattro anni dopo la sconfitta del 1940, i francesi stavano partecipando, all'altezza dei loro mezzi, alla caduta della Germania nazista.

*VIVE LE FRANCE!!!*

@Heisenberg882

2 жыл бұрын

It’s la

French soldiers were using the american helmet???

@Nettempereur

Жыл бұрын

Yes, mostly. French units were reequipped by the Allies before the invasion of Italy and the rest of Western Europe. We could not do it ourselves, our country (with its industries) was under German occupation.