that was the most succinct, comprehensive, level-headed summary of WWII I've ever heard - good show mate!

@priatalat

7 ай бұрын

This is why I love English. You can use words that mean the same thing but evoke specific emotions.

@MargaretUK

7 ай бұрын

💯👍

@marrs1013

7 ай бұрын

From a British centric European point of view, yes.

@danubiosalas4231

7 ай бұрын

@@marrs1013I guess France, Germany, Russia and Japan have KZreadrs able to do their own centric reviews.

@andymartin6471

5 ай бұрын

Better a American point of view?@@marrs1013

This is one of the best short summaries of WW2 that I have ever seen. Simply brilliant and should be shown in schools worldwide. Bloody well done.

@epicsilvergamer2545

16 күн бұрын

It is now! My teacher used it to explain to us WW2!

I'd watch Dan Snow explain pretty much anything. Great video!

Dan Snow, Bethany Hughes, Mary Beard and Simon...., are the best British historians. Love their narration and comprehensive understanding of history.

I love how you answer the question of when did the war start with 'it depends on your point of view' we in the west (UK for me) often only think of Europe, but if we generally accept the defeat of Japan as the end, I think it is fair to say that it began in 1937 with the invasion of China by Japan. Keep up the good work.

@anthonyeaton5153

6 ай бұрын

Speak for yourself I don’t just think Europe.

@TheGamer-ld8xd

6 ай бұрын

@@anthonyeaton5153He did say “often”

@user-cm9sn1xr1i

23 күн бұрын

No, I don't think so because the Axis alliance was signed in 1940, more precisely on September 27, 1940, Germany, Italy, and Japan signed the Tripartite Pact. WW2 start in Europe and end in Asia because the two majors power of the Axis was defeated in Europe by 1945.

@dawsonlindahl7427

20 күн бұрын

@@user-cm9sn1xr1iyes, this is the correct view. Don’t get me wrong, Japan was doing some wild shit beforehand. But Europe wouldn’t have gotten involved with Japan independently, it would have been just another regional war and Europe would have normalized relations with the Japanese empire within a decade

An amazing summary in under a half hour while still explaining all the major details clearly! Well done!

One part that never ceases to amaze me is the true global extent of the world war. Almost every country on the planet on some level was involved in the war, a scale even greater than the first. Even with our current world in chaos everything still feels far away so the scale of conflict in the 1940s is hard to comprehend.

@rageagainstmyhatchet

7 ай бұрын

Apart from South America... Which was largely unaffected(?)

@kueller917

7 ай бұрын

@@rageagainstmyhatchet In combat and destruction, yes, but for other reasons many ended up joining the Allies and aiding then with production, so were still part of the war.

@cskiller86

6 ай бұрын

Meanwhile, Switzerland is like "nah, bruh"

@inigobantok1579

4 ай бұрын

it was the culmination of 300 years of ideology set in a very simple premise: Liberty or Tyranny. Might vs Right. Democracy vs Fascism.

My great grandfather was at the battle of Midway and the battle of Okinawa. He used to tell me stories about them and he even had classic naval tattoos. He was a living bad ass and also a very sweet and loving man. RIP Papa

That was bloody brilliant

What an absolutely fantastic succinct brief of World War II. Really just absolutely succeeded here. Obviously there’s enough detail to hammer out tens of thousands of hours of video, but I’m guilty of it and know plenty of people who pursue those veins of knowledge and can easily miss out on some of the pretty significant aspects of the war. I’m sure this will be as educational a video for many as it will be inspirational to dive into new areas to learn more details of certain operations for people. Just blown away again by the quality of content here.

This was a great summary of WW2. I would love to see a similar video on The Great War.

Despite growing up with knowledge of the war, the scope and scale of it are still mind-boggling.

Bravo Dan!

Good this. A great summary! Nice one Dan and team. ⭐👍

Wow, really glossed over the North Africa campaign. No mention of the East Africa campaign or the fall of Singapore and only a glancing mention of Hong Kong. At least Imphal and Kohima was noted, but nothing else at all about the China-Burma-India theater. A decent summary but not comprehensive. Still appreciated this video.

I'm 65 and have been fascinated by the second world war since as a young lad watching all our yesterdays in the 1960's . For someone younger this is the perfect thing to watch to get an interest in an absolute fascinating part of world history.

What a good video

Despite knowing all of this…. Wow! Much respect. Love the channel, love Dan Snow. Also, this condensed, or bitesize video would be a great introduction for learners of this period.

A fantastic overview of WW2. I love your passion on the subject. It made me want to read about it in more detail 🙂👍

20:33 In 1944 indeed Soviets crushed German armies, but this one offensive must have been mentioned: operation Bagration - the biggest one, the most successful, the one which disintegrated the whole German central army, comparable to operation Uranus from 1942/43.

I learnt a lot with this vid, thanks, How did south america, keep them selves out, or did i miss a bit

Amazing summary of the war. Great job Dan!

What a wonderfull work!!! 🤩👌 Great video! 🙌🏻

I like this man; he gives detailed history.

That was an amazing quick summary! Inevitably simplifications were made. China was the scene of much bitter fighting throughout the was but lacked real highlights so I understand the minimal coverage. I have heard it argued that the German invasion of the Balkans did not delay Barbarossa (the invasion of the USSR) because they needed to wait for the ground to dry up after the spring mud season anyway. I think a word about the forced movements of people in post-war Europe would have been worthwhile. Those points made, it was an excellent video.

that was the most succinct, comprehensive, level-headed summary of WWII I've ever heard - good show mate! (bulger said it good)

@anthonyeaton5153

6 ай бұрын

Surely it is either succinct or comprehensive but not both.

A wonderful introduction by history Hit channel... Thank you for sharing .

That was a very effective, succinct and clear overview of an incredibly complex and important topic.

Oh, Dan Snow. I cried so much watching this. You always make the scale of war so much larger and at the same time, so much smaller somehow. Your next-door neighbor and the person across the globe. All of us have been torn apart and connected through war. The true violence and destruction, I cannot even comprehend. I can’t imagine the fear, the anger, the blood on all sides of the war. No matter how many movies, tv shows, and documentaries I watch, or books I read, I still cannot know the true cost in bullets and blood.

I’ve studied WWII for most of my adult life. This is very well put together. I don’t know why exactly but most of us have a hard time summarizing the war in a way that’s easy to understand. We get too bogged down in the details & debate which parts are more important than the others.

@janhansen554

4 ай бұрын

I have studied ww2 too alot. May i ask, when do u think germany lost ww2? At young age a set date at defeat at Stalingrad, at age 52, i set date when Hitler came to power. How about u?

Excellent ... thanks for posting.

Do one for WWI as well

Fantastic way to put such a complex time in history into a nutshell

Are you planning to make videos for WW3 after it is finished?

You’re the best

I admire the attempts of summarizing WWII, but I think that it is an error to do so as it obliges a very biased narrative... can we allow such bias given the amplitude of what happened? I don't think so... it is way too important, that should have been few episodes

Another perfect video from this channel! Thank-you.

That was excellent! Very informative and interesting.

Any chance of doing videos that focus on Canada and Australia? both the good and bad eh?..... Notice you left out the bombing the allies did during the Blitz

Yap sesh

@todd9593

2 ай бұрын

For real!!! I relate to this homie!

I see this reaching 5 million views and beyond

Excellent description. One very important point however that was left out. The battle of midway only succeeded because the Japanese didn't know that 3 American aircraft carriers were not in Pearl Harbour at the time of the raid. It was these ships with their hundreds of planes that were able to destroy the Japanese fleet. Had these ships been in Pearl Harbour at the time of the raid it might have been a completely different outcome.

Excellent short documentary!!!!!👏 Although, it's simply heartbreaking of all the loss of lives! 💔

The Axis betraying the Soviet Union was the worst mistake followed by Japan angering and waking a sleeping giant

Very annoyed that Ichigo was left off the summary.

Still don't understand the decision to engage USSR in the East before settling the western front if they were already stretched thin there as mentioned...

@syncopaint_minis3016

7 ай бұрын

Was Hitlers biggest military mistake

@oneworldawakening

7 ай бұрын

Madness, megalomania, possibly amphetimine-induced.

@finndaniels9139

6 ай бұрын

I’d put forward 3 points : 1) the matters in the west were unsettle-able. Germany had no means of invading Britain, they evidently couldn’t win in the air, and they couldn’t force her to the negotiating table. 2) war with the Soviets is the overall aim of this war. The other bits are peripheral, even though they are so strong in the public conscience. War is inevitable. i) Germany needed resources that the Soviets held. Oil and food especially. War was not possible without these resources. ii) Hitler and the Nazis were guided by ideology, and this ideology often overtook common sense. They thought the Soviets had no means of repelling them. They had failed in Poland 10 yrs ago, in Finland 3 yrs ago etc. they were ineffective in ww1, and it seems they’ve only gotten worse. Our idea of the USSR is one that is formed from hindsight, the view at the time (especially to an ideologically tainted mind) was not the same. 3) that the Soviets are getting stronger year on year. Within the previous decade Stalins 5 yr plans had - at terrible human cost - modernised the Soviet nation. They have very quickly caught up to the industrial strength of other western nations, and have within the last 3 yrs overtaken Germany in a broad range of industrial markers. They are out producing them in steel, oil, and much else. The soviet army is also undergoing a process of modernisation. A great purge is undertaken throughout 1938 and 39, and much of the upper army leadership is removed from their positions. New doctrines of deep battle are being implemented on the strategic and tactical level. The soviet air force is modernising rapidly as well. For almost the last time for the foreseeable future, Germany is in a better situation for war than the Soviets. This will never be true again, for the Nazi state. To summarise : war b/n the two is inevitable. Germany is still the top dog, but for not much longer at all. The window for a succesful war is closing very fast (it has already closed in fact, but this isn’t clear at the time). The war in the west is both unwinnable and not on a significant scale yet. Hope this helps :)

Hey Dan. Love your work 👍

That's a great overview of the war. I think you did an excellent job explaining the German-UK dynamic. Germany never wanted to fight Britain they just wanted them to give up so they could focus on eastern Europe. In a way it's lucky the Brits could retreat after Dunkirk, protected by the channel. If there was a landbridge between Britain and Europe, Britain would have fallen very quickly in the early days of the war similar to France.

@ruthindigo

7 ай бұрын

If there was a land bridge between Britain and Europe the world would look so completely different it's not really worth considering.

@benboucher-giles2241

7 ай бұрын

@@ruthindigo I'm inclined to agree: Had such a land bridge existed the UK would have been defeated swiftly but that's because the UK had focused upon its navy almost to the exclusion of the army, largely because it has a large moat around it (and needed a navy to obtain and retain its Empire). Had there been a land bridge (and of course there was one until c.6,500 BC, search for 'Doggerland') then I suspect that the Western part of Europe would have enjoyed a very different history indeed. A more interesting question would be, had the English been unable to get any troops off the mainland at Dunkirk, would that have changed Hitler's timetable for the invasion of Britain and would it have changed the course of the war?

@anthonyeaton5153

6 ай бұрын

@@benboucher-giles2241 is that the sum of your WW2 knowledge talking about What Ifs? It is a lazy argument.

making japan surrender and sign a treaty on a US battleship is such a cold moment 🥶🥶💯

Very good but not sure how you can talk of turning back the Japanese without noting the Australians and Kokoda Track.

Pretty decent video, but just a quick thing, Finland lost territory in both the Winter War and Continuation War. So while technically they “lost” they still maintained sovereignty.

After Dunkirk and the rest of France I always wondered if Brittain would’ve been open to either allying w/ Hitler or a non aggression pact while Hitler targeted the SU. Once Hitler bombed Britain that possibility was gone forever, but the few months before that may have been able to change history

Great summary. Pity the bomber command offensive including fire bombs and Operation Chastise didn't really advance the war effort, and Guy Gibson and Co unfortunately killed over 1,000 of allied POWs in their raid. Pearl Harbour didn't hold up the Americans either as the water was shallow and they were able to retrieve their sunken ships and make them sea worthy again quickly

@nursestoyland

5 ай бұрын

plus the 3rd canceled strike was meant to strike at the oil reserves and submarine pens

Hey Dan. Love your work . This man is an absolute treasure. Must protect at all costs..

Wow~! A great overview. Excellent.

Fantastic video however did I miss it or was Malta not mentioned at all?

19:55 The maps are not correct. They present north and central (north Philippines) Pacific, not south (New Guinea) and central.

Another brilliant video

amazing video

This was fantastic. Thanks Dan

missed the kokoda track and the first victory of the japanese on land in ww2

@anthonyeaton5153

6 ай бұрын

Both minor in the concept of the war.

Oops: I'm sure there are already comments on this, but the Battle of the Phillippine Sea was in June 1944, not Sept 3,1939, as the tag indicates.

Fantastic video

4:40 I'm always buckled up for you Dan.

The last official action of the war against Japan was not at Nagasaki on 9th August, but on 15th August 1945 when Fleet Air Arm pilots shot down eight Mitsubishi Zeros for the loss of a single British aircraft. Its 19 year-old pilot became one of the last direct casualties of the war when he was murdered by his captors after the emperor announced Japan's surrender later that day. If you learn your history from the Americans, you will be unaware of the fact that the British took part in the battles of both Iwo Jima and Okinawa. On 1st April 1945 HMS Indefatigable, part of the now-forgotten British Pacific Fleet, received a direct hit from a kamikaze attack. With their metal decks, British carriers could withstand these attacks far better than the American wooden-decked ships; the Indefatigable was back in action an hour later. The British Pacific Fleet was the largest ever assembled by the Royal Navy, and its contribution to the fight against the Japanese was significant. It comprised over 200 ships, including six first-class aircraft carriers, and over 750 aircraft. Its personnel comprised British, Australian, New Zealand, South African, Canadian and other Commonwealth citizens as well as one Greek - Prince Philip.

The story of the graff spee is an interesting one, if left unchecked it could have caused serious damage to Atlantic supply convoys however while in port it’s captain who when faced with a small british force incorrectly thought his situation hopeless scuttled the ship

Why didn't you mention that in 30th USSR also expanded in Europe??

Wow, it realy was 28 minutes too! Thank you for this!

WWII was an extension of WWI

Well done!

amazing synopsis of WW II, as always History Hit has hit the bulls eye.

I'm always a little surprised by how the American perspective barely makes mention of the eastern front against the Soviets.

Good show

13:30 “People sent to camps where they starved to death.” It is a pretty well-known fact that Soviet soldiers were giving up and becoming prisoners as Germans fed them. Also, there was not enough military personnel to guard Soviet prisoners. They voluntarily guarded themselves and stayed with no problems as long as they had some food. Most of them were proclaimed enemies of the state for treason and afterward killed in Soviet Gulags. If the Soviet state wasn't worse than the nazis, it was at least the same evil.

Thanks!

Hey Dan, great video. Although as an Aussie, I do get sick and tired of being lumped into “British Forces” and/or American Forces. Aussies did perform quite well as part of the Empire (Tobruk and El Alamein) and in coalition with USA in the Pacific (Singapore and Kokoda). Even the good old Kiwis deserve a mention for Crete and Italy. And Canada was awesome! Might be nice to get a look in every now and then.🇦🇺🇳🇿🇨🇦

@stephmaehder4155

7 ай бұрын

I was shocked not to hear Australia even mentioned with El Alamein! I'm Canadian and am more familiar with the battles of mainland Europe. Even with my limited knowledge of the African theater I know the Australians were unbelievable.

@MrHullRockers

7 ай бұрын

They were British Empire troops. India, South Africa, Scotland, Wales, England and Northern Ireland's individual troops don't get a mention either.

@TheSnoopHogg69

7 ай бұрын

As a Kiwi I agree. Always hard to not hear the ANZACs get a shout

@anthonyeaton5153

6 ай бұрын

It makes a change not hearing the Aussies mentioned who on other forums can’t stop shouting about themselves whilst denigrating British troops which is scandalous.

@perarduaadastra7648

6 ай бұрын

@@anthonyeaton5153 Of course, as opposed to us being written off as untrained, ill disciplined, colonial hooligans. How dare we be parochial? All’s fair in love and war. 🇦🇺

Great video, though the British didn’t sink the Graf Spee, it was scuttled by its own crew

@anthonyeaton5153

6 ай бұрын

You are correct.

Tidy summary. Thanks

...and yet not a single word about Iron Curtain...

That was fantastic! Thank you!

Tried, but no cigar, & am amazed at the claim “all you need”could be given in this time frame - many essential issues are barely or not at all touched (the origins; the morality, war crimes - both sides - etc etc) & the best you could do imho would be to recommend watching the whole series of The World at War - as just an introduction. Some good, if brief, footage, though!

Fantastic 😮

This video should be shown to all school children. Every year.

@anthonyeaton5153

6 ай бұрын

Heaven forbid.

So I'm 11 minutes and 10 seconds in and thoroughly enjoying the video - thanks guys! Butt we are 1 year into the war with 5 to go. Something I think some bits might get missed out😂

@montrelouisebohon-harris7023

7 ай бұрын

He did a very, very thorough and good job. He couldn’t go into details about how extremely heartbreaking and hard it was.. I was just watching a Pacific battle of Peleliu, on the history channel. I was in tears halfway through the show.. this was the most brutal island fight in the Pacific, and it was win the Americans were going in to take the Philippines. General, MacArthur had to leave the Philippines a couple years prior because the government didn’t want him killed and sadly he and the Navy left behind army, nurses and other soldiers that were nowhere near close enough to hold back Japan. What these Japanese did to the nurses and the soldiers with despicable and the soldiers were taking to POW camps mostly in China.. most of them died from malaria, or overwork and lack of food. All, but probably about 20 of the army nurses were taken down to the beach and told to walk into the water in the Japanese shot and killed them all. awful.. It’s just so sad that those trips didn’t get to go with macArthur when he left the Philippines, but the nurses were not about to leave the people of the Philippines! The nurses said that from the very beginning, and some of the army troops stayed back as well. Are. Good hearts, but it was really sad. The battle of Peleliu was so disgusting that the US Marines couldn’t take it alone so they had to send an army troops and they still have trouble because the Japanese had the island so heavily manned and they were desperate. The Japanese would fake like they were surrendering, and have grenades under their armpits and run up to several Marines and throw them at the same time so after that, the Marines had to make sure that practically none of the Japanese were surrendering, and they just killed them, because they could not be trusted. After the battle of Peleliu , & other end of the show, when they were loading up all these deceased and injured men from the final couple battles on the island, the narrator said “ the soldiers gave their blood, sweat, tears, and their lives & for some even their SANITY, to keep the United States and territories, and out of our Allies safe and free.” I was crying because I could see these men being lifted up getting on the ships, and they were in such awful shape or deceased.. America first drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and then it was actually a plutonium bomb on Nagasaki. The plutonium bomb was easier for us tonight because it’s a chemical and it’s not an element that you have to get out of the Earth. That plutonium bomb didn’t kill any more people than the atomic bomb and it was about 150,000 for each bomb dropped on the Japanese cities but the plutonium bong cloud was a humongous. I was surprised by the size of it that the casualties on the ground we’re not anymore, but they really weren’t. Oh and invasion would’ve probably left 10 or 15 million total people or more dead so that’s why Truman chose to drop the bombs. The atom bomb dropped by the US in Japan, was absolutely nothing in scale, compared to what Russia and North Korea and even the United States has today which is sad . A couple, mr. and Mrs. Rosenbaum, shoulder, gave the secrets to the Soviet union, and that’s how they got the atomic bomb. The couple was arrested, and in prison for treason, and then they were executed. Sad. That’s how intelligent gets spread around and either it’s fine but most of the time it’s traitors for money.

Incredible explanation of Ww2 in such a detailed but simple way. Excellent

My grandfathers both fought in world war 2 my dads father in the army in I think the kings Liverpool regiment and my mums father served in the Royal Navy all 4 brothers went to sea he served aboard HMS Storke I use to have his uniform and life jacket he served in the Atlantic convoys to America and Russia with tales of hunting the U Boats and trying to avoid the Stuka s brave men now sadly all passed on godbless

Funny how briefly Finland was mentioned, as US, UK, France and other western countries gave aid to Finland during the Winter war and sold a lot of weapons, because of USSR's aggression towards Finland. Churchill even gave a great speech about the Finnish bravery, you can easily find it. Helsinki was also the only capital in Europe with London to not be occupied during an aggression. Because of Stalin joining the Allied countries, Finland had to get weapons elsewhere to keep its independence and after the peace with USSR, Germany burned the whole Lappland. Anyone can be hypocritical about who allied with who, but Poland, Finland and many other small countries were sold between dictators, when other western countries were only watching. Poland fought bravely against two huge dictatorships at the same time. Finland fought against one dictatorship at a time. Our veterans have always said that "never ever alone again" and Finland finally got itself to NATO, that if the eastern dictatorship tries to invade again, Finland will prevail again.

I appreciate that you acknowledge that in some regard that WWII didn't necessarily start in 1939. That always bugged me. I get it. People "declare war" but the Nazis had famously already invaded other countries. And as you noted, Japan had already started conquering Asia

@bloonstowerdefender

6 ай бұрын

Look up some of the stuff the Japanese did. Particularly to the Chinese

The Graf Spee scuttled herself. She had been damaged but not sunk by 2 British ships and one New Zealand ship..

Saying that south Korea was a democracy is a wild take

In the intro you forget the fourth dictator critical to the start, also wanting to increase his empire: the Soviet Union/Joe Stalin and the desire for half of Poland, part of Finland, and all of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia. Stalin was Hitlers equal partner and resource supplier until Hitler turned on him.

@John14-6...

26 күн бұрын

My thoughts exactly!

This video was a masterclass

One day, I hope to have one tenth of the charisma of Dan Snow

New to this channel in general but the presenter (sorry - missed your name) is fantastic.

I know Australia wasn't really a major player but I wish you would have mentioned the Rats of Tobruk who were instrumental in halting the axis advance in North Africa

@anthonyeaton5153

6 ай бұрын

Tobruk was a defeat. It was El Alamein that defeated the Germans in Africa. After which the Australians faded.

Sat down with a hot buttery crumpet in my hand at the start , I realised by the end only taken one bite ! This has never happened before.

Why cant i hear

He is soooo wearing that henley

Cool

Amazing