The world's first passenger drone, the Ehang 184, has been announced. Is this the start of personal flight? Watch and find out!

@crazytrashman123

8 жыл бұрын

+ColdFusion Please back away from the mic a little. Bass on a vocal is nice, but this is just overkill. I can't even turn the volume up because it gets so boomy.

@JulianG.

8 жыл бұрын

+ColdFusion 4:36 You forgot the annotation to the digital camera video.

@ColdFusion

8 жыл бұрын

+Julian G. Cheers for that, I've added it in.

@saigangasharansher9320

8 жыл бұрын

+ColdFusion the future of war machines and military medical advancements

@niteshshakya6866

8 жыл бұрын

+ColdFusion Can you do a video on Sony?? And explain what happen between Sony and Ericsson.

Even if a vehicle has the ability to control itself, I would always want the option of the person inside being able to take control. Plus, flying it manually is a lot more fun.

@JafarAlMoosa

8 жыл бұрын

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky although I completely agree, there is no way public transportation in the air can go mainstream while allowing manual control, because of the traffic of course, we can't build roads in the air, which means that one would need to be aware of traffic that could come at you from any degree in all axis, the human brain simply can't handle all that in my opinion.

@JafarAlMoosa

8 жыл бұрын

***** yeah obviously, which supports the idea that everything needs to be automated, of course there will be sensors all around the vehicle, that doesn't mean that a human brain is going to be able to keep up with all the input from these sensors.

@imejandiskate

8 жыл бұрын

+Jafar Al-Moosa you hit it spot on. The only logical future would have to be automated.

@anzaeria

8 жыл бұрын

+Jafar Al-Moosa That's all fine and well until the computing system that controls the craft has a glitch or malfunction. Without any option for manual override in such a situation, it's a case of bye bye birdie.

@GloomGaiGar

8 жыл бұрын

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky People are still iffy about automated cars much less an aircraft

What if this drone is like a taxi-bus, It can only land on stations that are all around a city and the battery will be switched with a fully-charged one that makes sense to me :-)

@spookje111

8 жыл бұрын

+Atli Tobiasson Yes, and with virtual highways (all drones in one network) you can use the sky way better then the road

@AtliTobiasson

8 жыл бұрын

spookje111 Yeah, exactly!! :)

@arthur5

8 жыл бұрын

+Atli Tobiasson it use too much energy anyway

@AtliTobiasson

8 жыл бұрын

+Magic_Sowap maybe it doesn't get enaugh, we are expecting an electric battery revolution in 9 years

@arthur5

8 жыл бұрын

***** Even if we get a new super battery, energy has to come from somewhere...

Man, I love your videos! from the start until the end. I mean that old vintage start where you show us the old world is the most beautyful things I saw on the youtube, and its pretty touchy. keep up the good work, you have my support :)

Controlled by a Microsoft computer? Imagine if it got BSOD, then it really would be Blue Screen Of DEATH

@infinitworld7106

8 жыл бұрын

+Hamza trueeeeeeeeeee, i hope it doesnt run on windows XP

@arthur5

8 жыл бұрын

+InfinitWorld even windows 10 crashes, they should use Linux

@borinese

8 жыл бұрын

+Hamza haha i laughed so hard about this

@zeroangelmk1

8 жыл бұрын

+Hamza Knowing Windows 10, it would probably reboot mid-flight to install updates

@-7-man

8 жыл бұрын

+Hamza Cortana can sing u a song to ease your pain after u crash

*It should have a parachute on top of the drone (in case of any malfunction) and an air bag at the bottom*

@internationalinnovator6294

7 жыл бұрын

FernandoP1 - Art Zone Productions that's what I'm saying

@computer5272

7 жыл бұрын

Parachutes are extraordinarily heavy.

@internationalinnovator6294

7 жыл бұрын

Computer if people are able to ware them then a machine with motors are able to ware them

@computer5272

7 жыл бұрын

International Innovator Never did I claim that you can't put a parachute on this thing. You can and it would be a good safety feature. However I did say they are very heavy. over 50 pounds at the lighter and simpler end of the spectrum for an aircraft of this size but that's with a manual pull cord, that doesn't even account for the extra electronics and sensors required. All of this weight makes a massive difference in rotorcraft which already struggle with power to weight ratios. If the weight limit for the passenger is 230 pounds it's now less than 180 when you add a parachute and that's a GENEROUS estimate.

@internationalinnovator6294

7 жыл бұрын

true but it probably would have a light weight body that is rigid made out of reinforced carbon plastic which is found in the bmw i3 and would save a lot of weight the heaviest thing in there would be the battery and this type of aircraft would be way less mechanically complicated none of the motors would need to be physically connected with heavy shafts and rotors

ColdFusion is the best!!! I love your videos. I try to shear them as often as I can.

I love your videos! You showcase topics and products that are actually interesting!

Fantastic. Would love to see more short vids from you like this. Thanks for the work you put into all your awesome vids.

A "quick little video" is better than most from big established KZread creators. You, sir, are the fist (and only for now) creator that I support on Patreon.

Cold Fusion one word 'Fantastic ', one of he best technological channel on youtube!! . keep it bro and love your work and effort you put in it.

Great work as usual ! Thx coldfustion !!

Great video once again Dagogo! Keep up the good work! :)

Great work..... And thanks to.. You.... Thank you for keeping us update for this dynamic world

I love your videos and I love the music selection you made and also, your sound is flawless congratulations, already subscribed.

Really appreciate the way you portray science! Good work bro!!!!

+ColdFusion Your videos are just amazing and entertaining.Keep it up!

Your videos are the best ... I always like to watch them

This video is really informative video! Great work! Keep it up buddy!

Dagogo your videos are very well produced. Keep it up.

It's still a work in progress but this is the future of transportation. Good job Ehang! Nice video Dagogo as always! :)

Nice video as always!

you do great job man! love it.

I seen this at CES! Another great video. :)

Nice video ! thanks for sharing!

I've followed ColdFusion since Galaxy Note 1 tutorials. Love the concept back then. Glad you able to maintain the concept and expanded into one of the best channels to talk about technology out there. Wish all the best to you mate. You're such an inspiration. Can't wait for upcoming Nicola Tesla video. Cheers!

Inspiring and touching that Ehang was started due to deaths from plane and helicopter accidents. Safety is the first concern of the passenger and hopefully Ehang and other "drone car" manufacturers will do all they can to ensure that. The airline industry can learn a thing or two about safety concerns from these guys. Great video, my friend. Thank you.

Your voice is so soothing

Awesome channel!

The intro music, god i love Just A Gent, also nice video, as i'm used to on your channel :)

keep up the good work man :)

What a time to be alive! I am astounded again and again how far we have gotten as a species! The technology we see emerging is like something out of a Science Fiction novel. Thanks, ColdFusion!

great video nice and precise

I really love your channel

I want one ! - Thanks for sharing !

I believe as you said this is not the whole story, but because of ideas and visionary people like this we can do so much things. I can compare this to VR. Just starting, not for the major market yet, but still growing so fast. The importance here is not the drone itself, but the thoughts and efforts behind it, because there will be another man with a different story, who can say - Hey, I can do this better! Great video as always!

awesome video!

Quality video as usual. My main concern is also the back up protocol in the event of failure.

Flying cars are finally here THINK YOU JESUS IVE WAITED SO LONG FOR THIS

Good video like always. :-)

subscribed, great video

Great video

This is a fantastic mode of transportation that is way ahead of its time!

From what I can tell from the little you have let the viewers watch. You are giving a very critical review of a prototype. Basing your opinion on information you have said you don't have. I could have gotten better information from their commercial, which I did, after this video raised more questions.

Loving the new intro C:

Cool video as always!! :D I cant image to fly a plane like that. I would love to try it. :D

Hahaha. I'm very glad I subscribed to your channel. if not just for the music clips. I almost asked the song at the end. Then I realized I could play it in Firefox and Shazam at same time on my Android. 😊

Still waiting on that Solarcity video Dagogo... lol Thanks for all the vids brotha, their awesome.

Got some things wrong: The airbus plane was not the first to cross the channel fully electric. the very day before, an electric cri-cri crossed, taking the title from the airbus plane. the 184 is triple redundant, in it's flight control systems, and it can fly safely with a motor or even two out, as long as they are not adjacent. The fact that the FAA won't easily certify it means nothing, as the FAA will not certify important safety fixes for older aircraft, and when they do, it often takes decades, and people can die in the meantime. many operators defy the fAA, and perform the fixes anyway, saving countless lives. for inspection, they swap the older parts back, then have to switch again before resuming flight. The safest, best, most modern aircraft fly under EXPERIMENTAL exemptions, but are not allowed for commercial purposes. The FAA is a rouge agency, which continually violates it's congressional mandates, and goes against the purpose for which it was created, with regard to smaller aircraft. The real place of the FAA is in large, commercial aviation, where they do a great job, and are in their element. they are not flexible enough to deal with anything else effectively. there are a lot of great people working for the FAA, so the problem is not with them per say, but with the structure, and oversight of the organization,a slo with certain corruption within the agency, at high levels. This corruption will become evident very soon. The 184 might not be the ultimate answer, Agreed, but is an amazing step on the way there, and may receive significant adoption. Good for the Chinese, and maybe their progress will shame the west into doing what they should have all along as well. way to go! other than that, great video. tell your congressman/woman to hold the FAA responsible for their actions, and repeated violations of congressional mandates/ reform act.

Could you put recommend videos in a way that they are available for access via a phone app (so that when the information button on the top right corner is pressed the recommendations will come up) as I think many people are watching this content on mobile devices Keep up the good work

There's a lot of discussion regarding a multirotor (MR) vs a single rotor (SR) helicopter. If full-scale vehicles perform similar to professional-grade RC vehicles, which I think they more or less do when it comes to the basics, then here are some facts:-SRs are more efficient due to blade size (more flight time per energy source)-SRs are significantly more stable in windy conditions (contrary to many comments here)-SRs are capable of generating more thrust, in general (larger payloads)-SRs are much, much more agile (again, contrary to some comments here)-SRs are significantly more reliable (more mechanically-based, less electronically based)-SRs are generally less expensive to make-SRs can also be controlled through autopilot systems (not just true for MRs)-SRs can autorotate when main power supply is cut-SRs are much easier to make run on combustion engines (this hugely increases flight time, load carrying capacity, ...)-SRs are quieter-MRs are easier to fly without autopilot system-MRs have fewer mechanical parts and, in this sense, are easier to work on mechanically-MRs are less finicky when it comes to eliminating vibrations (smaller propellers)-MRs have redundancy of motors, provided that they are octos (either flat or co-axial) and still have main power supply intact-MRs are less dangerous to surrounding persons and property (smaller propellers with less inertia)In general, I personally do not think that MRs are a good substitute for SRs, even though both may serve their purpose under particular circumstances. "Drones/Quadcopters/..." are in large part a fad with which many hope to make money from.

I love ur intro!

All the movies we've seen of air traffic and futuristic flying not only will come true but will be beyond.

you never know and we can never predict the future and technology is growing very fast and thanks for the video that was a good one

Dagogo you make just awesome videos.... i have a quick suggestion that their should be a video on how big is IBM

This machine is fascinating. I'd love one.

please make videoes on how big cocacola,ibm,microsoft,sony,nike etc. because your channel was first to make videos on how big series and it is great to watch.

awesome!

I wish the whole video was like the last five seconds. sick as shit, just flyin around settin shit on fire. paper goes on tongue, music begins... lovit!

Weather and malfunctions is the death of this. Great to see innovations and people pushing the boundaries of tech.

Do a video on Rasberry Pi! I would love to know how they started!

The best youtuber

so exciting to see where technology is taking us

nice skating

The first passenger Multirotor ist the Volocopter VC200. It would be nice if you have mention that.

Can't wait until you get that gold youtube plaque!

Good update - Like it. Only corrections I would state is airbus did not cross the channel first with an electric aircraft. It was done the day before by a private pilot flying an electric Cri Cri ! Also.. A BRS system would be needed so should a major problem happen a passenger could simply pul the handle and come down on a shoot.

I think it requires its own license set in levels depending on the automation full semi or full pilot control and size, it also requires a new infrastructure that doesn't exist yet that can handle the new traffic load.

Hey, great video, really interesting :) You should do one about Hyperloop x SpaceX Cheers

i am looking forward to the tesla one, but the im aslo almost always looking forward to your videos

I prefer the German's Lilium concept you had earlier because 1) more efficient than quadcopter 2) has multiple fans so that single failure is easier to recover from. Perhaps the Chinese or the Americans will design similar.

hey there 😎 as long as we're on the topic of Aviation I wonder if you could do a mini documentary on today's Flexwing Design implementation and even the refitting older aircraft with this design, for instance the Boeing 747. thanks

i love your channel man..!!! I've seen u take requests for new videos... so can u make a video on how big is google and what it does and from where its revenue come from...

Practical uses for this drone may not be in personal transportation. Imagine drones like this delivering products for business. This could be the beginning of a new industry.

Hi Dagogo, was wondering if you could make a video based on the aircraft manufacturer Airbus. :)

You listen to your commenters... I like that.

I want one ! now now ! 😊

"The Jetsons" is exactly what I was thinking of!

this guy must have million subscribers and viewers

Great News!

+coldfusion please create a story about James Dyson and his company!

Imagine if the 100 years of R&D on gasoline vehicles had been spent on things like these...

@DjRuccy

8 жыл бұрын

+Sidharth Satheesh You're Indian and you call it gasoline? It's Petrol.

@ssu6440

6 жыл бұрын

Sidharth Satheesh It would use a larger rotor cos diesel can provide enough oomph. Electric batteries forces it to compromise to low energy designs. But the longer the rotor, the more leveraged power it can provide compared to shorter rotors BUT spinning large rotors requires alot of energy that electric batteries can't provide. Only gasoline can reach that kind of massive power. :( LueLou.. Dj Rucy Helicoters uses diesel aka aviation gasoline, not petrol lol

quads are DEFF the future of transportation. This iteration is nowhere near ideal, but come read this comment in 50 years and you'll thumbs up me

@ramoh

8 жыл бұрын

probably 20-30 tops

@SimenSupreme

8 жыл бұрын

Not likely.... This is just a horrible design for a helicopter. It has no redundancy for errors and horrible range. Tell me how this could possible replace a normal helicopter!

@KijanaMBrajon

8 жыл бұрын

+SimenSupreme doood. expand your mind, everything is easy if you want it bad enough.

@SimenSupreme

8 жыл бұрын

+No Google I don't want to use my real name Ahhh, because a helicopter is actually usefull and this flying mashine is not? +Kijana Well it is possible todo it, but its a lot harder and unreliable then a helicopter so WHY do it? Tell me 1 way this is better then a helicopter.

@SimenSupreme

8 жыл бұрын

+No Google I don't want to use my real name you are so wrong. You always compare to the closest machine of simular function. So a helicopter

Yes the range may be small however that could be improved

+ColdFusion , where do you get your content from? Pretty amazed by how you put it together to tell the story...

@ernestoditerribile

8 жыл бұрын

Mashable is mentioned in the description

cool...

Something slightly on a similar topic you could do is on the company Solar Impulse. I'd love to hear what their deal is

can't wait to watch your nikola tesla video!!! :)

increase the range with better battery technology, add a force absorbing air cushion used in military air drops under the drone. and a parachute

Is there any hope you could do one on virtual reality? You seem to have touched on it once or twice already but I can't seem to find any dedicated to it. Cheers!!

Here is your answer for malfunction. It's on their website Four arms and eight propellers offer great lifting power and safety. Even with one propeller malfunctions, it can still land in the nearest possible area safely. The 184 AAV has embedded with Ehangen fail safe system. If any components malfunction or disconnect, the aircraft will immediately land in the nearest possible area to ensure safety. The communication is encrypted and each AAV has its independent key.

I think as a general rule any automated mode of transport should spend 1 year transporting cargo first

Hey Cold, if you have ever heard of this corporation called Corning that's known for it's unbreakable gorilla glass, you should totally make a video explaining it's history.

They should create a version of this that only uses 2 blades, one for lift and one for rotation. Can call it the monodrone or helicopter or something like that

More videos ! :D

You should make a video on the history if blackberry

What is the range on this thing in between battery charges ? I think it needs at least 200 miles for it to be useful.

Nice New intro

futuristic !

Nice Hat's off you