Donate to the Legal Fight HERE: nagr.link/mkp

@6P3-MK4

3 ай бұрын

One question, how is this comment 6hrs old, when this video says 3 hours old? Am I missing something bc 2+2 isn't adding up

These activist judge's need to be disbarred & charged with dereliction of duty. For failure to honor their oath the defend the US Constitution.

@davidmoore3479

3 ай бұрын

I agree, they're going against the founders vision for America.

Fentanyl is not in the constitution as a right to own. Drugs are not guns.

@ethanmac639

3 ай бұрын

Yes it is, property rights and body autonomy rights, and you can put what you choose in your body and sell any substance

@tufftrucker40

3 ай бұрын

​@ethanmac639 what amendment are you sighting?

@embracethesuck1041

3 ай бұрын

While they may not be individually enumerated, there are few more basic human rights than choosing what you put in your body. Freedom means freedom to screw yourself up.

@ethanmac639

3 ай бұрын

@@tufftrucker40 amendment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 My inalienable freedoms and natural rights especially firearm and defense rights own and carry, do not come from a man made document or man pal, they are innate because I am a human and alive, btw I am Canadian, and I, like all humans on earth, have the same negative natural rights, aka inalienable natural God given freedoms and natural rights, especially firearm and defense rights own and carry!

@flawless1up

3 ай бұрын

​@ethanmac639 they aren't ready for that ethan. you are correct

When a judge living in a Constitutional Republic who took an oath to uphold the Constitution openly states his disgust for the Constitution and how it should be avoided, they should be more than just removed from their position. I would take this as him wanting to revoke his citizenship.

The last time I read the Constitution, fentanyl was not mentioned at all, much less as a right as Arms are

how about, the government is not entitled to any power

Wait, what? Citizens have a right to keep and bear fentanyl? Where did this judge go to law school?

@BlackoutPatriot

3 ай бұрын

Well he's probably on it

@stevenwagner9912

3 ай бұрын

The government has no authority to regulate either in the Constitution. Just like they can't force us to put anything into our body.

Know what else is in common use? Air, oxygen, food and water..so they can ban that too by this criminal judge who by law should be removed immediately for not holding his oath of office and arrested, logic dictates. Smh

@aj-2savage896

3 ай бұрын

Air? Oxygen" But . . .but . . . thugs already "can't breathe."

Time to clean out the system and start over.

Supreme Court has ruled no two step process.

I will protect my family with any tool I can get my hands on

Judges need to be held accountable, there is no justice in America anymore.

Unreasonably dangerous?? Is there such a thing as "reasonably dangerous"? All firearms are dangerous, they're suppose to be, it seems reasonable.

A proud member of NAGR. Good luck overcoming this incredibly stupid judge's ruling.

@RARufus

3 ай бұрын

Me too. Card carrying member here. Go get them NAGR!

The primary function of the second amendment is to ensure that Americans always have access to firearms suitable for modern combat. Self defense is a fringe benefit of the 2A.

Also, bring in police use of these arms. There is no law that requires an AR15 yet public safety officials choose these firearms to defend themselves and others for reasons that are likely "safe and common.". If they are "unusual and dangerous" why are they the overwhelming choice of cost-conscious public safety organizations? "Unusual and dangerous" argument by the state would be an interesting argument to use against them in a wrongful death lawsuit. Do they argue they are not "unusual and dangerous" when the state is accused of wrongdoing? Can the states "unusual and dangerous" filings be filed in the civil cases when they shoot someone with a rifle?

@sombra6153

3 ай бұрын

Another question to ask is why these state officials don’t arm their enforcement elements with selective fire weapons such as M16, M4s, and MP5s, instead acquiring and issuing common semi automatic firearms such as ARs? How about the fact that the ARs are less difficult to obtain and perceived less dangerous inthe hands of poorly trained officers or are stolen from government vehicles.

There are more guns in the US than people. I guess people aren’t “common” either.

Hannah, you have a special talent for laying all this legal stuff out in a concise and easy to understand manner. I learn more from 10 minutes with you than hours with other videos speaking about the same topics, thank you for that!

What an insane take for that judge to have.

SCOTUS has about 7 of these cases getting ready to hit them , they can't fence sit on all of them.

Thank you, Hannah! You are able to break it all down and share with us exactly what is going on, and being said. We appreciate you and your team!!

How the f#ck is this not Treason?

Go get em Hannah

So glad to have you folks continuing the work started 250 years ago right here in MA! Not regretting my decision to become a Frontline Defender with NAGR!

Oh my God... Been waiting for this forever! FIRST!!

The district court “judge” seems to have forgotten that drugs are not protected by the Bill of Rights and in most cases are prohibited by black letter law, while arms are protected by the Bill of Rights.

all gun control is very counter intuitive bc disarming citizens against illegally armed criminals is illogical

“Jurisprudential alchemy” LoL

Applying the "words of the [original] framers" the NFA itself is not only unconstitutional, but wholly null & void; as any arm in common *military* use is protected.

Keep fighting for the American people and their Constitutional Rights!!!

These courts shall be brought to heel.

You should check out some criminal NFA cases. For example, US v. Peterson in the 5th Circuit.

The history and tradition of enforced firearms regulations at the time of the founding. Without clarifying that you leave open the door to all this judicial alchemy.

Great info. Ty Keep me geekn!!! 🇺🇸👍😎

This suck but we just need these cases to get to the Supreme Court. All these lower courts are corrupt

@alaefarmestatesllc

3 ай бұрын

As if the Supreme Court isn’t bought and paid for also lol.

Since the Founding Fathers literally felt enlightened Citizens should be able to own anything with which to wage war. Honestly that would mean if you can meet DOE standards for safe storage nukes could be owned privately. So knowing this any Arms Ban is Unconstitutional.

What clause in the Constitution gives government the power to ban flowers or fentanyl? When you legitimize unconstitutional authority in any aspect, you legitimize it totally.

Really, you shouldn't be able to ban either. Drug control is almost as new of a concept of gun control and women's suffrage in America.

These judges shouldn't be appointed by one side of the other at all in our government

And even if the circuit agrees and forbids banning the weapons, the state will just pass another law that we .use fight and hope to overturn.

Also question, why is there no way to get these court cases rushed? These judges are dragging their feet on purpose

A Ban is an infringement in totality on an amendment that shall not be infringed.

"Red Balls!!! Crack in a can!"

Ummm, where is Fentanyl and/or narcotics addressed in the Bill of Rights?

Text, history and tradition is one form of judicial review, not two. What the U.S. Supreme always review every case is the Original one form of review is text, history and tradition.

Non compliance!

Y’all are a god send!!! PLEASE keep up the great fight!!! Thank you!!

Another beautiful summery is the last 4 words of the 2nd amendment------ SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED ------ But lawyers love making things as difficult as possible and reading meanings into the law that aren't there. This is why things get tired up in court for years and years. Our court system is screwed and in turn, the people are screwed.

@flawless1up

3 ай бұрын

also the ruling "when in doubt throw it out" pretty simple. your 4 words

If the criminals (government) have them, then i/we have every right!

Florida’s phosphate miners are highly trained technicians who sit in air-conditioned, 8-million-pound excavators. They unearth some 10 million tons of phosphate rock a year, supplying nearly a quarter of global demand for the “white gold” that helps crops grow. Florida is home to one of the richest phosphate deposits in the world. For about 140 years, the state has housed a secluded and powerful industry that mines one of three essential nutrients for the global fertilizer market.

Yikes. Thanks for the update, Hannah.

Great update, thanks Hannah!

No such thing as an assult rifle.

Ar15 is arguably the most efficient, stable, and safe small arm platform. At least one of the most nominal. The ban on them, or safety features such as those that allow you to stabilize them, forces users to a less stable, controlled, or accurate platform and inherently leas safe. Its not about safety then.

I'm sorry but last time I checked i'm not hunter biden

That would suggest under Caleb v Campbell that the minimum load today would be six 30-round magazines. Most law uniform enforcement go on duty with three magazines of varying capacity based on caliber and configuration, but up to at least 45 rounds, including the magazine in the pistol, and again depending on caliber and configurations. So while they are waiting their turns to live through history being repeated, those who don’t know it in the first place…

Thanks for the update!

Just put them on the list.

Comprehension and logic….

How do idiots become judges?

Thanks Hannah!❤

And the judge needs to be sued and disbarred

They don't know how to read the words of the framers. They don't wanna listen to the correct meanings of anything. They don't care anymore, they just want things they away. That's called being a you know what? Let's get to the bottom of this stuff. You guys, you know you're in the right. They're in the wrong, just get it. Let's get it done.

You certainly came up with a complicated analysis of this ruling. Please allow me to provide a simpler summary of the ruling; With this ruling court declares that it is an entirely illegitimate kangaroo court - willing to rule their personal bias without regard to laws or precedent. This court has divested any claim to moral authority. If this sounds like contempt of court, it is. I hold nothing but contempt for this court or any other willing to rule contrary to civil rights.

I will never give up my guns

What about commiforina

Mitt said his favorite meat is hotdogs...

Nope!

Good luck in the 1st circuit, lol.

What’s going on in Connecticut and New York?

I think some people should explain what the Commonwealth is there's a lot of people seemingly don't know even though they should

...anyone else crushin' on the lovely, pro 2A, well articulated Hannah Hill? Asking for a friend.

Excellent presentation

Why use the self defense argument when the second amendment is about the right to bear arms. The second amendment rights were expanded by the courts through court rulings. Until we get congressional law passed that rights within constitution are absolute. Any gains in court rulings is limited until liberal majority decides to overturn the previous ruling.

NAGR helps citizens like Kyle Rittenhouse & is on target for this CASE. Since Wayne LaPierre is no longer running NRA, I suspect they will just become an org for private, high-end rifle gun clubs! Is how it is!

A stoned population, being necessary for the people to escape the realities of their lives, the right of the people to possess and use narcotics for recreational purposes shall not be infringed. If that was in the Constitution somewhere, then you could make the argument for fentanyl. But it is, and the Second amendment is there. The judge has no basic knowledge of the Constitution and what it is.

wow

The 2nd amendment is the most important.

I can listen to you talk law all stinking day mama!

Not assult rifle..battle rifle.

They are just thinking of Joe's kid.

Bottom line is, "the same as what the second amendment is for, " and it isn't for hunting and plinking either, it's to "enforce our constitution upon a tyrant govt, like what we have now, and you may as well forget the vote with democrats around

I never liked mitt Romney before he's elected or after he's always been a snake in the grass

And we don’t pay people for their opinion, and we damn sure don’t pay judges to give us their opinion. My gun rights don’t stop where their feelings begin.

2️⃣🅰️❗️2️⃣🅰️❗️2️⃣🅰️❗️

Dude, ladybro, the judge is right even if that judge is auth-left demonseed. Common possession shouldnt grant allowance of something. Neither should common lack of possession. Heller was only for a narrow context as a facile argument in favor of handguns, and should not have any bearing on rights law. The judge is FOS about the awb issue and banning, but right about the common use argument.

Algorithm comment

Tired of youtube unsubscribing me!

If theres a stupid argument to be made rest asurred a democrat will make it.

"...'their' desire to keep and bear them" is an unreferenced pronoun. Pretty sloppy.

Stop saying "Anti Gun" !!! The correct wording is "Anti Self Defense""