Anyone else rewatching all of these videos for the millionth time? Anyone else wish Wil comes back with his own channel and bring back Tabletop? Me too

While everyone else was screaming "7, there were 7 kids!" I was screaming "i is IMAGINARY, not IRRATIONAL!"

@SykoLiu

8 жыл бұрын

+OtakuAlice It is also irrational.

@Proper-G

8 жыл бұрын

+SykoLiu yup

@teskjil5628

8 жыл бұрын

+SykoLiu Umm.... no.

@SykoLiu

8 жыл бұрын

teskjil Oh no? Then how would YOU represent it as the ratio of two whole numbers? Or are you just talking out of your ass? Yep. You were.

@teskjil5628

8 жыл бұрын

The typical ignorant internet-comment... Well, I guess it depends on which definition of irrational numbers you are using, but in general, i is not irrational. Being rational or irrational applies to real numbers. If z=a+ib, then it can be applied to a and b respectively, but not to z itself. (Although, if you are interested, check out gaussian integers.) TL;DR Being not rational ≠ irrational. Being real and not rational = irrational.

The Weasley question answers broke my soul

If a honey bee flapped its wings 6000 times in one section, it would probably burst into flames.

@idontknow11829

7 жыл бұрын

Or reach maximum beeage, stronger than the maximum borkage.

@michaeljohnson9916

5 жыл бұрын

We can rebuild him. We hive the technology.

Holy Crap Phil LaMarr. He's Kit Fisto, Bail Organa, Samurai Jack, Green Lantern, Wilt, Hermes, Static Shock, Osmosis Jones, Baxter Stockman, The Earth King, Bolbi from Jimmy Neutron wait BOLBI FROM JIMMY NEUTRON OH THAT THERE JUST CHANGED THE GAME.

@dragonsgaminghoard7531

5 жыл бұрын

Osmosis Jones = Chris Rock

@jean-paulaudette9246

4 жыл бұрын

WHAT! He was The Brain, Nibbler AND Baxter Stockman!?! AND Orson Welles!

Gotta say, this table is the best of the "talk around the table" episodes. So much awesome banter! Especially from Phil.

This is the best group ever. You need to bring all of them back.

Everyone always forgets about Bill and Charlie, those poor sods

@kidpax

9 жыл бұрын

Yeah...it's the twins, the girl, the third wheel, the proctor, and the rest...so 7.

@platypusofdeath3582

9 жыл бұрын

If you think about it, Bill was only in a couple of the books, and Charlie was only mentioned, he never made a physical appearance. At least if I remember it correctly, I haven't read the books in a couple of years.

@ademro

9 жыл бұрын

Platypus of Death They all made a few physical appearances.

@annaredmond7242

9 жыл бұрын

Platypus of Death Yeah you might remember Charlie as the one who works with dragons in Romania and therefore helps out with the 2nd task in book 4. He also shows up in a few other places and although we don't physically see him in the first book he does help relocate Norbert.

@platypusofdeath3582

9 жыл бұрын

Anna Redmond Oh, thanks for clearing that up for me.

not reading Harry Potter is not a bad thing... Reading Harry Potter and not knowing how many weasleys there are is...

@isaacbird2317

4 жыл бұрын

I wish I could like this multiple times

@jean-paulaudette9246

4 жыл бұрын

@@isaacbird2317 Yeah, a Like, for every time I re-watch it!

Phil Lamarr is such a classy gent o:

this episode has by far the most lovely guests! Love all 3 of them

What a pleasant voice Phil LaMarr has. Like honey for the ears.

charlie isn't the oldest, its bill

@michaelrate7693

8 жыл бұрын

Is it bad that my initial reaction was How Many children for Weasley? Do you mean Arthur/Molly -7 kids - or Ron/Hermione - 2 kids-?

@Becausebooks1234

8 жыл бұрын

It's Bill Charlie Percy Fred + George Ron Ginny And then Ginny and Harry had 3 kids: James Albus Lily (godchild: Teddy Lupin) And Ron and Hermione had 2 kids: Rose Hugo Percy and Audrey had 2 (?) kids: Lucy Molly II Bill and Fleur: Victiore Dominique Louis George and Angelina: Roxanne Fred II Charlie's single and Fred is (spoiler) dead.

@Iris_1217

7 жыл бұрын

I know that it reads as "the second" (Especially since Fred didn't have any kids so it wouldn't be "Fred Jr."), but it just amuses me to imagine George and Angelina's child being called "Fred Two."

"I know nascar is the most popular sport...so i'm going to go with a percentage greater than 50% which would be impossible for any sport other than nascar"

@jakobfalthammar8357

6 жыл бұрын

I know right? I was thinking the same thing. Silly Willy. :P

@jean-paulaudette9246

4 жыл бұрын

I find all sports horrifically boring (2 exceptions, soccer/football, and women's volleyball) ...but I know some trivia. NASCAR stands for the National Association of Stock CAr Racing. (thank you L. Ron Hubbard).

This was one of my favorite episodes of TableTop. The interaction was so comfortable and funny at the same time, well done!

This is my favourite episode yet. So jolly and entertaining :D The game looks awesome to play.

Technically the i should have been placed above and to the left of 1.

@walkerbrowning3642

9 жыл бұрын

Lol you're completely right

@whosmaya666

5 жыл бұрын

Ikr

Although I couldn't find the Family Edition of Wits and Wagers anymore I did get the Party Edition of Wits and Wagers because I saw this video. I try and play with other friends and it has proven fun. Thanks Wil Wheaton and Table Top. When is there going to be a Table Top episode on Big Bang Theory to expose Table Top to a wider audience?

This was my favorite episode of TableTop. Awesome people!

This is the funniest episode to date. All players worked off of each other so well and joked around. Was really enjoyable to watch.

It's weird seeing Samurai Jack talk a lot

6,000 flaps per second. Seriously

@Bruno3605

5 жыл бұрын

FLAPS ~~

@xMRxZEROx

5 жыл бұрын

Right? I guess they didn't understand just how fast that'd have to be. I'm pretty sure if a Bee could flap 6000 times per second it'd rip a hole in the space time continuum and become the first time traveling being in history... wait... maybe THAT'S where all the bees are disappearing to. They've succeeded at time travel. 😳

16:03 I was the exact same way. The only thing I've ever stolen was a set of crayons from a restaurant, and I felt so guilty I eventually sent them back and haven't stolen a single thing since.

Just looked through all the TableTop episodes again and this one is without a doubt my favorite...

I died when phill said "FINAL ANSWA?"

For the bee wing flaps per second, you can just think about the approximate pitch of a buzz, and keep in mind A above middle C is 440 Hz. So yeah, around 200 something sounds right.

@AeonSolari

8 жыл бұрын

At least for those of you who actually know what the heck that even means. :P

@whosmaya666

5 жыл бұрын

I was about to comment that myself XD

Still one of my favorite episodes. Just a great group and perfect game for them to play. I still burst out laughing throughout the game.

Phil LaMarr is one of my favorite voice actors. Glad he was in this one.

5:35 Did the editor accidentally not line up the camera shots correctly? "Guy for the win, guy for the win"

29:12 Handshake denied! Poor Veronica.

I never get tired of watching this episode.

Phil LaMarr is one of my favorite voice actors. He's so talented.

Veronica is beautiful

You guys should totally make an episode of Apples to Apples. That would be awesome!

This was the first time I've ever seen Veronica on anything and she gained a new fan. Her reactions were equal parts hilarious and adorable. And adorable cussing is the best lol.

I love Phil LaMarr. I hope to see him more on other table top games.

Charlie went to Romania to study Dragons

they'll probably be super disappointed ;p

@Bsmall666

2 жыл бұрын

Always bet on pink

Oh gawd... I can't breathe....this episode is by far the funniest I've seen of TableTop (and that is saying something 'cause I've died watching other ones though this one has made me cry and my sides hurt!!!)

"We cant even get a throphy" from veronica at the very end killed me

They got the Weasley question and I thought everyone was going to put seven. Then Wil admitted not having HP knowledge, so I thought everyone but will. Then everyone was counting, so I thought someone would probably put six because everyone forgets Percy. Then NO ONE put seven! "Who's Charlie?" "Charlie's the oldest..." ...no he's not...

@Binerexis

10 жыл бұрын

They're not the target demographic, it's really not that surprising.

@bob8mybobbob

10 жыл бұрын

Binerexis Perhaps not, but everyone was certainly acting as though Veronica was an expert, and the guy at the end of the table (I haven't watched this in a while, so I forgot his name) was confident when he picked the question, because he read it to his kids.

@TheFutboler22

10 жыл бұрын

My question is (MAJOR SPOILERS, I'm returning a lot so it shouldn't show up if you don't click Read more) Is Jimmy now technically fully correct, seeing as Fred died in book 7? Or was this game made before the 7th book?

@Binerexis

10 жыл бұрын

TasteDatRainbow Being dead doesn't remove someone from the family.

@jbjstyx

9 жыл бұрын

TasteDatRainbow Why??????????????????????????????????????

New name for the Loser's Lounge: "Wheatown"....

Hey Wil, I just thought I'd go beyond a simple thumbs up for this one. I really love what you're doing with this series, and I've actually purchased this game as a result of your video. I watched this one with a not-exactly-a-gamer friend, and we were able to connect a little better because of it. Thanks for the work you're putting into this.

You guys have helped me get my guys into B-Games. I also took a football to the eye, but my twin boys seem to be jockish at times so the Board Game stuff is a good balance.

screams number 7 at screen in dark cave

Veronica BELMONT.. fucking badass last name???

@dynasxv

9 жыл бұрын

Only reason she lost the Harry Potter question's cause she was distracted by her plans to kill Dracula later that day.

@bswtsp21

6 жыл бұрын

It’s also a stop on the Chicago L.

Veronica's hair has a beautifully sheen, during her interview moments. Lovely!

This is probably my favorite episode of the season.

great inside look into how the game is played, though I would have like to hear everyone's opinions on the game as a whole and if its party sustainable?

Ummm,.. Veronica Belmont... Will, please beg her back for season 3.

I have to question if any of them have ever seen an 18oz package of Oreos. Because there are 3 even rows meaning their answers divide into: 8, 6, 12, and 20. And if you think about it like that the 60 doesn't seem so weird.

And everything he says is pure gold.

90 Native Americans accepted the Facebook invited, but only 12 showed up.

What do you call a dog who likes dubstep sub-WOOFer

I kept screaming "SEVEN WEASLEY KIDS!!!!!" at the monitor, my family think I'm more crazier than before lol

Picked up the Wits & Wagers Party Edition after watching this episode. Can't wait for Season 2!

I love Jimmy he's so funny

Obama Weasley. That's all I gotta say.

Gotta be one of my favorite episodes yet.

Best tabletop yet. Veronica and LaMarr were hilarious.

“Jimmy (being at 15 mind you) gets two putting him at 16” ...um wil, last I checked, 15+2 doesn’t equal 16, it equals 17. Meaning jimmy was the sole winner. Math facts!

@shirayuki2974

4 жыл бұрын

The video number got it wrong. On the scoreboard, they tied.

@no.6076

4 жыл бұрын

yeah he 14 not 15

I don't even remember the last time I watched TV

@RuthlessWillGaming

9 жыл бұрын

Annaie1234 I forgot cable existed

@caziquepoyais5643

7 жыл бұрын

Annaie1234 ï

This would be a fun game to do at family parties and stuff. :) Hope to see more in season 2!!!

This show needs another season!

No one remembered Linus's speech from Charlie Brown Thanksgiving about Chief Massasoit bringing 90 of his bravest warriors...oh well.

@ShadowOfCicero

10 жыл бұрын

I remembered the ratio was about 2 Indians to 1 Pilgrim, but I actually guessed too high because I forgot to compensate for half the Pilgrims dying the winter before.

Double Stuf Oreos can't come 36 to the pack - it must be an odd number, because I always eat them by twos and always have an odd one left over.

@ortzinator

10 жыл бұрын

Gremlins

@Shadoswulf

10 жыл бұрын

***** Damn them Gremlins and their shenanigans!

@Kippydahcamper

10 жыл бұрын

Oh god the implications...

@Chaznar27

10 жыл бұрын

Do you double stuff your double stuffs? That would make sense if you do it by twos.

@nicholasjordan6251

10 жыл бұрын

Purple Lava Sheep!

"Take the sticker off your hat, you look stupid" haha I love it.

Season 2! We must have it. Everyone support Tabletop!

Come on Phil! What about Metal Gear!

i is an imaginary number, not irrational

"Deforestation, it's been those f*cking pandas the whole time." Is my favourite thing in a loooong time. xD

This was one of the first TableTop inspired purchases for us, it's quite accessible to many different kinds of people.

If Nascar is the most liked sport, how could the number for football be over 50%?

@borjangagovski6545

9 жыл бұрын

Even if it is the most liked sport, that doesn't necessarily mean that it is over 50%.

@durnazzer1111

9 жыл бұрын

Nascar doesn't necessarily have to be over 50%, but Football cannot be over 50%. If football is 50.001%, Nacar would be less than 49.999%, therefore making football the most liked sport.

@sw96

9 жыл бұрын

Dan Plays Games It would depend on if the survey data was exclusive or not, if they asked people to only write down their most favorite sport then what you say is correct. However if they ask people to list all the sports they like then you could have 1 sport be liked by say 80% of the population while another is liked by only 60%, it would just mean that there are a lot of people who like BOTH sport 1 and 2.

@Ruminations09

9 жыл бұрын

jagofett78studios *facepalm* Why? Why do so many people make this same mistake? It's still called "football," it's only "futbol" in Spanish. Go to England, they don't call the sport soccer there (well, some might, but most don't), they don't call it futbol there, they call it football. The exact same spelling and pronunciation as the American sport with the egg shaped not-ball.

@LordQwert

9 жыл бұрын

Nascar is the "most popular". The percent is how many people list it as their favorite. Different metrics. It could be that almost everyone likes Nascar, but has something they like better, whereas Football might be highly polarizing, which the largest favorite group, but no one outside that group liking it at all.

(10:46) And the answer to your little calculation is I. As in I put the swag back in science.

@Selrahcthewise

4 жыл бұрын

Sticking daggers in Leibniz. All up in the attic on some Harry Potter business. The universe is infinite,but this battle is finished!

This looks like a great party game! It's on the list (maybe I'll get lucky and one of my friends will buy it). Keep up the great work!

Great episode, didn't feel awkward this time! Thanks.

Not only did you lose nerd cred for not having read Harry Potter, Wil. You also lose some because i is not an irrational number; it is an imaginary or complex number.

@djveneko

10 жыл бұрын

Lol (-1)^(1/2) kids. I laughed too hard at that. But yes he was wrong.

@EdwardBerner

10 жыл бұрын

SPD Well, technically _i_ does not equal sqrt(-1), since both +i and -i qualify for that. The actual definition is that i^2 = -1

@djveneko

10 жыл бұрын

EdwardBerner i^(2) = -1 which is the same thing as sqrt(-1)^(2)=-1 sooooo. i^2 = -1 sqrt both sides sqrt(i^2)= sqrt(-1) LHS sqrt cancels with power of 2 leaving i = sqrt(-1) i really dont understand what you were going with this.

@EdwardBerner

10 жыл бұрын

SPD My point was, that root operations behaves a little differently when complex numbers are involved. Your example uses the regular square root, which is only defined for numbers larger or equal to zero. In the complex plane, every root operation has as many "correct answers" as the number of the root you are taking. There are always two square roots, three third roots, four fourth roots and so on (except for the number zero). There is no good way to single out one specific result from these to be the "correct" one, so the square root of -1 is both +i and -i. So, defining i so that i^2 = -1 is cleaner. Also, here's why your example does not work: 1 = 1 (-1)^2 = 1 | sqrt both sides sqrt((-1)^2) = sqrt(1) | sqrt cancels with power of 2 -1 = 1

@djveneko

10 жыл бұрын

EdwardBerner 1 = 1 My example does work the reason why you got -1 = 1 is because you only worked on the LHS and completely ignored the RHS. but if you do the same thing you did to the LHS and just work the RHS you still get -1 = -1. (-1)^2 = 1 | sqrt both sides sqrt((-1)^2) = sqrt(1) -1 = sqrt(1) || sqrt(1) = sqrt(-1 * -1)

HOW COULD YOU NOT GET THE WEASLEY CHILDREN????? There is so much shame... it is done.... Also, Wil, "my children grew out of it" - one does not simply one out of Harry Potter!

love this group!!!

So weird seeing Jimmy Wong on here and watching him on The Command Zone

Good old Obama Weasley.

Bring Phil back in season 3!

We demand a second season!!

god i love phil lamarr's voice!

If it's any comfort, Wil, I've never read Harry Potter either. :P

@seraphiccandy21

10 жыл бұрын

Wow random guy on the internet! I bet that makes him feel loads better! Cool story bro!

@ilusao1111

9 жыл бұрын

seraphiccandy21 He was also just a random guy. If you get a girlfriend at first she's also only gonna be a random guy. Dude, don't be rude just because you're not friendly... wait wut?

@seraphiccandy21

9 жыл бұрын

ilusao1111 Wait, what? If you get a girlfriend at first she's only gonna be a random guy O_o Um girls can't be guys unless they...you know....have an operation to change that...and what does that even have to do with anything??

@ilusao1111

9 жыл бұрын

seraphiccandy21 I meant random girl, ok? And that has a lot to do with what you said. You acted like a dick towards his friendly comment.

@seraphiccandy21

9 жыл бұрын

ilusao1111 No, I acted sarcastically. Welcome to the internet.

they also placed "i" after 1 but before every other number, implying that you can compare complex numbers as they are which you can't. they either should have put "i" before 1 (measuring the total value of each complex number's real part which would give 0 for "i") or under/over 1 (measuring the euclidean distance from the origin which is equal to 1).

@JPNox

10 жыл бұрын

I guess they confused "i" with "Pi", would fit right there

I remembered Charlie but forgot Percy! Damnit. Awesome ep, great guests :D

knew the answer to the weasley question immediately. I NEED THIS GAME

15+2 =16 ?? WAT ?? Jimmy Win -_-

@EightThreeEight

9 жыл бұрын

Jimmy was on 14 points. If he was on 15, he would have won in the previous round.

@y2a1979

9 жыл бұрын

MajorLeagueGamer838 They must've mess up their graphic, then, because they showed him as being fifteen when Wil said fourteen. lol

@Curseddemonsasukez

9 жыл бұрын

Jimmy Labrecque Wil even says he goes over 16 but since 16 is MAX he cant have 17 points so it still a "tie" since they are playing by the rules and the numbering is only UP TO 16 try paying attention.

The answers to the harry potter question made me sad... (Wtf?!? I have an owl on my roof right now. It sounds angry too.)

"Veronica Belmont: coming from behind." Probably my favorite quote

i love the music they play in the background of the winners wall

Bet Phil really wants to go back, back to the past, and redo his answers

Ok, I'm 25, but when Wil said "Turn the radio down, pull up your pants, and take that sticker off your hat because you look stupid." I started slow clapping! It ain't being old, it's being MEN!

@anthonykevinbatayola1783

9 жыл бұрын

old men perhaps? kidding! XD i'm 24 btw, so you and me we both be clapping. haha

@xoSteveOox

9 жыл бұрын

Lol, I have a 17 year old sister so I know now why we were hated so much; We were just plain stupid for no reason than thinking it was cool lol

lol your football comment was awesome first time I played football I sprained my ankle so bad it has been screwed up ever since. However, I still love the sport.

LOL when she started naming Bradys

i isn't irrational. it's imaginary :3

@FortWhenTeaThyme

8 жыл бұрын

+Jack Whitelaw It's also irrational. Try expressing it as a ratio of integers.

@JohnSmith-fg7xh

8 жыл бұрын

+FortWhenTeaThyme Irrational numbers are real numbers than cannot be created by dividing two integers. So no, it isn't irrational.

@boliveirabr

8 жыл бұрын

Exactly what I thought!

@darkmarc12

8 жыл бұрын

+John Smith Give this man and Jack Whitelaw some likes please!!

@TheStickAsylum

7 жыл бұрын

It's a Gaussian rational number. It's neither rational nor irrational, since both of those labels are defined only on real numbers.

That panda answer was bullshit. Ro was right on the Takenoko episode. And there's an internet full of sources you can check. It's ~30lbs a day.

@tjburford

8 жыл бұрын

+NessOnett8 From TravelChinaGuide: An adult panda eats about 40kg (88 pounds) fresh bamboo shoot a day, 14kg (about 31 pounds) bamboo stalks, or 20kg (about 44 pounds) bamboo leaves.

Heard about this again on Phenome-nerds I like the way they described it. It’s trivia, but without the losers feeling like they’re dumb. Because you see everyone’s answers, you can gauge your knowledge on people in your group who are probably more knowledgeable in it.

Loved this episode