What a fantastic interview. One of the most genuine and informative interviews I have ever watched. What I loved about this interview is that it was non biased and respected other forms of martial arts but at the same time described to people what you offer your students with your style of teaching Wing Chun. This is real and no fake. I thoroughly enjoyed it. Very well explained. That interviewer was great, he threw challenging, authentic and very interesting questions at you. You answered them very well leaving the viewers watching this unconfused and with a clearer understanding of the way you see martial arts and how it may work in real life. I am a photographer and filmmaker and will give you a example of how a stills camera or movie camera compares with exactly with how a person doing any form of martial arts or boxing, has to be made ready for the application it decides to undertake. How one sees a image through a camera does not necessary mean that when you see the final results the image comes out the way you saw it. Who has ever taken a photo of themselves or a subject and when they see the final results they are disappointed? This is because we see the image thought the camera subjectively but the camera see's and records the image objectively. The difference between a amateur photographer/filmmaker is a amateur will just point and shoot without having any real depth of understanding of how his or her camera works. One has to understand the technological, physical limitations and concept of how a image is captured and manipulated to produce the image. To do this a proffessional videographer/photographer will have tested his knowledge of the tool he uses for taking on the many jobs he uses his/her camera for and will know its limitations. One know their limitation by calibrating their camera for the task ahead. This is why I loved when you said that they loose, because they don't prepare themselves. I truly believe that once you know your tools limitations, you are on the way to being successful, because you will always be in the best position, knowing what you can use in a given situation and what you can't use. The biggest advantage of that also, is you know what to work on to improve. What a incredible interview. Thanks cuz for sharing this. I admire the years of dedication and hard work you put into learning your art.
@AKAHDS4 жыл бұрын
Long time admirer of sifu louison. Thanks for taking time to film this.
@bobbobbing43814 жыл бұрын
Sifu Louison is one of my wing chun heroes! I have his DVDs and I think now is the time to review them again given these lock downs. I wonder, does Sifu Louison do do any online tuition with respects to correcting the forms that I can in part learn from his DVDs? No substitute to learning in person, I know, but given these restrictions on movement it might be the only way.
@redlight78544 жыл бұрын
Deep.....dispels a lot of the myths out there - First Class!!
@urmonn81624 жыл бұрын
Actually what hes talking about is the teaching part, what good is it if you can fight but you cant become a teacher?
@smartresearchwingchun4944 жыл бұрын
To everyone: Mainstream Wing Chun (most of what you see in the market) is unscientific. The instructions are corrupt; techniques are misinterpreted , done and taught wrongly - hence it can't be used for self-defence since the techniques are malfunctioning. And those who practise it will experience distorted biomechanics (using limbs wrongly). This is why practitioners of mainstream Wing Chun keep failing when they spar with non-Wing Chun guys. We had conducted an in-depth scientific research and concluded this. We also had found the solution to restore ancient Wing Chun (the original one which was scientific and workable). The ancient Wing Chun wasn't like anything that you guys see nowadays (frail arms *Chi Sao* + awkward body and movement) - ancient Wing Chun is direct and simple and it looks like other martial arts. Wing Chun was never a soft martial art - this is a misinterpretation.
Пікірлер: 6
What a fantastic interview. One of the most genuine and informative interviews I have ever watched. What I loved about this interview is that it was non biased and respected other forms of martial arts but at the same time described to people what you offer your students with your style of teaching Wing Chun. This is real and no fake. I thoroughly enjoyed it. Very well explained. That interviewer was great, he threw challenging, authentic and very interesting questions at you. You answered them very well leaving the viewers watching this unconfused and with a clearer understanding of the way you see martial arts and how it may work in real life. I am a photographer and filmmaker and will give you a example of how a stills camera or movie camera compares with exactly with how a person doing any form of martial arts or boxing, has to be made ready for the application it decides to undertake. How one sees a image through a camera does not necessary mean that when you see the final results the image comes out the way you saw it. Who has ever taken a photo of themselves or a subject and when they see the final results they are disappointed? This is because we see the image thought the camera subjectively but the camera see's and records the image objectively. The difference between a amateur photographer/filmmaker is a amateur will just point and shoot without having any real depth of understanding of how his or her camera works. One has to understand the technological, physical limitations and concept of how a image is captured and manipulated to produce the image. To do this a proffessional videographer/photographer will have tested his knowledge of the tool he uses for taking on the many jobs he uses his/her camera for and will know its limitations. One know their limitation by calibrating their camera for the task ahead. This is why I loved when you said that they loose, because they don't prepare themselves. I truly believe that once you know your tools limitations, you are on the way to being successful, because you will always be in the best position, knowing what you can use in a given situation and what you can't use. The biggest advantage of that also, is you know what to work on to improve. What a incredible interview. Thanks cuz for sharing this. I admire the years of dedication and hard work you put into learning your art.
Long time admirer of sifu louison. Thanks for taking time to film this.
Sifu Louison is one of my wing chun heroes! I have his DVDs and I think now is the time to review them again given these lock downs. I wonder, does Sifu Louison do do any online tuition with respects to correcting the forms that I can in part learn from his DVDs? No substitute to learning in person, I know, but given these restrictions on movement it might be the only way.
Deep.....dispels a lot of the myths out there - First Class!!
Actually what hes talking about is the teaching part, what good is it if you can fight but you cant become a teacher?
To everyone: Mainstream Wing Chun (most of what you see in the market) is unscientific. The instructions are corrupt; techniques are misinterpreted , done and taught wrongly - hence it can't be used for self-defence since the techniques are malfunctioning. And those who practise it will experience distorted biomechanics (using limbs wrongly). This is why practitioners of mainstream Wing Chun keep failing when they spar with non-Wing Chun guys. We had conducted an in-depth scientific research and concluded this. We also had found the solution to restore ancient Wing Chun (the original one which was scientific and workable). The ancient Wing Chun wasn't like anything that you guys see nowadays (frail arms *Chi Sao* + awkward body and movement) - ancient Wing Chun is direct and simple and it looks like other martial arts. Wing Chun was never a soft martial art - this is a misinterpretation.