I keep asking myself what China has done to provoke a war. I keep coming up with the same answer. They've done nothing, except for perhaps being highly productive and successful.

@pbworld7858

6 ай бұрын

What has China done to provoke a war? They bettered themselves without relying on USA. That's a no-no.

@Anonymous------

6 ай бұрын

The reason is given in Jack London's "Unparalleled Invasion" which he published in 1910, it explains why exactly this would happen to China, it also explains why there would be a pandemic breakout in China.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

And you're right Gregory

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Yrs, we can go back 100 years and we can find the real reasons - I was a huge fan of Jack London as a kid but only found this one recently

@Bobbyleejoe2556

6 ай бұрын

Have you tried racism?? 😂

China: "US, why do you hate us?" US: "Because you are more prosperous than us."

@ZhenYae

6 ай бұрын

Nah... 😂 God did not make the Chinese...😊

@peanut0brain

6 ай бұрын

​@@ZhenYaeChinese don't believe in God.. What a silly imaginary thing for silly people to believe in

@chualooong1737

6 ай бұрын

​@@ZhenYae Man made Creator God in his own image!

@monipenny408

6 ай бұрын

...US: "...because we just take what we want, been at it since 1776"

@VampireA-Oni

6 ай бұрын

@@peanut0brain Chinese do believe in gods, many gods indeed, by just not the Western Abrahamic God.

No!, no war. You said it. Three dead soldiers just came home to US.

@user-pl6dp9rp6v

6 ай бұрын

I wonder if that is a false frag.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

That's not a war, Yeapsoon, that's a battle, or a conflict and, in this case, they are illegally in Syria, not in Jordan as they claim - that's going to create provocation but not a war - war and conflict are not quite the same

@PhiloSurfer

6 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799 Ya, Biden lied by saying the soldiers were in Jordan when they were in Syria because the truth will exposure their illegal occupation of the oil-rich part of Syria.

@ZhenYae

6 ай бұрын

​​@TakeTheRedPillOfTruthAndAwaken Next move. File a lawsuit with ICJ against them for war crimes. It might come sooner than we think after this week ie. Biden and Cameron etc.

@MetaView7

6 ай бұрын

@TakeTheRedPillOfTruthAndAwaken Since the beginning of time, whoever has the technology owns the war. The shift has begun.

Agree Jerry. The likelihood of a war is very low.

In the Korean War, China didn't have very much, but they were able to fight the U S to a standstill. They didn't have air superiority, they didn't have a navy, they lacked heavy artillery, they lacked armored vehicles, but they were able to defend themselves. The Douglas MacArthur wanted to use atomic bombs on China, but Truman didn't want to escalate the war. Today, the PRC is many times stronger than it was in 1951, they have a world class navy, a very large air force, the largest land army on the planet, lots of heavy equipment, and a industrial base that could sustain a war of attrition. The U S is not used to fighting a war with a pier to pier adversary. If they can't even win in Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan, what makes you think they can take on a country like China or Russia both of which have thermal nuclear weapons, and a large military industrial complex?

@masnur7007

6 ай бұрын

Endia 🇮🇳 numar 1 ....​@@user-bt6ns1sp1l

@multiplierfx6429

6 ай бұрын

@@user-bt6ns1sp1l India is a joke.

@fatdoi003

6 ай бұрын

you do know how many in chinese volunteer army died in the korean war?

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Seems to be a popular reply, and hard to ague with, it's got 80 likes and that's about as high as any reply I ever get will have

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I'm really not sure wherwe India comes into this discussion, they certainly aren't interetsted in global peace right now

Spot on mate. A good example for what you said was US treasury secretary Janet Yellen's trip to Africa. She flew to airports (built by China), was driven to conference centers (build by China) over highways (built by China) in order to convince Africans not to work with China. I don't think you need 3 guesses to figure out how that went.

War with China will take one of two forms: limited skirmishes with conventional arms, or all-out nuclear confrontation. Not even the US is crazy enough to go nuclear, so that leaves only conventional warfare. The US, despite all its bravado, knows full well that if it couldn't beat China in the 50s in Korea- when Chinese forces were poorly equipped, it's certainly not going to beat China now, when China boasts one of the best-equipped military anywhere. I agree with your assessment that if war comes, it will be fought between China and a US proxy, most likely some desperately poor country like the Philippines. Rich nations like South Korea and Singapore have no reason to become cannon fodder for the US, and Japan wouldn't dare, lest China decides to collect a long-overdue blood debt. Every country in Asia has China as its biggest trading partner, and are all benefiting from friendly ties with it. To lure one of them into abandoning an obvious good thing in return for certain military humiliation will be a near-impossible task. The US will no doubt make extravagant promises of military and financial rewards for anyone who would listen, but with a 34 trillion-dollar national debt that everyone can see, I seriously doubt anyone will buy this bridge.

@ZhenYae

6 ай бұрын

Why Singapore. The Chinese Diaspora built up Singapore and gave the Chinese LOTS OF ASSISTANCE AFTER DENG'S VISIT WITH LKY IN 89. THE KINSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO IS STRONG.

@parttimethinker7611

6 ай бұрын

It seemed that the Chinese are letting go of all blood debts and past animosities with their neighbors far and near. However, some viewed that act with suspicion and to some, a sign of weakness. Fortunately, many took it as opportunities.

@monipenny408

6 ай бұрын

There will be no hot war between U$ and China. U$ military is designed to fight farmers not real military, UKR is case in point, U$ could have entered the war but did not, because it knows Russia could hit back just as hard. U$ have never won any real wars, even during WW2, U$ entered the war towards the tail end of WW2 where Adolf has already lost the war of attrition to USSR, without USSR we would all be speaking Deutsch and shout "HH", you don't have to like the Russians, but despite all the fear mongering of Russia building a new empire, that did not happen post WW2. Russia has no plan to expand, it just wants to be left alone (like most non fascist countries) and not continuously be threatened by fascist NUTO-U$UK gang of 7 and their global expansion.

@esphilee

6 ай бұрын

Hope philippine people are informed. They can only strike for win-win with collaboration. With South China sea code of conduct, everyone benefits and there will be peace. They will be like Ukraine if they choose to be the chess piece for USA elites.

@fatdoi003

6 ай бұрын

if Philippines joins in, all the Spratly Is and islands between Taiwan and Philippines will be under chinese control..... if Japan joins in, Okinawa will be liberated and the surrounding islands...... if S Korea joins in, N Korea will unify the country..... in any case, u.s will lose Guam

I am not Chinese or socialist admirer, but this channel is trustworthy and deserves far more subscribers for thruth to be known.

@yaoliang1580

6 ай бұрын

The majority of the ignorant public of the US n its vassal states are so brainwashed by their corrupt leaders fake news propaganda that they r no longer able to differentiate between real n fake news. The world is not just destroyed by the evil but also the ignorant

@hokiec4974

6 ай бұрын

Jerry got it right, “honesty is the best policy”

@MetaView7

6 ай бұрын

Whether a socialist admirer or not, we are living in it. There is no escape. We have medicare, welfare, free school, free handouts, unemployment benefits, trade unions, corporate bailouts, forgivable loans, and trade unions. Did you know, no matter which country, that over 15% of the GDP is generated by government-owned businesses?

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks John - if you think so, please don't be afraid to share widely - I am not Chinese either, and until recently would never have considered myself socialist but the more I learn about Socialism, the mote I think it makes sense

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Yes

I am worried actually, as US has 34T debts, and they just try to revise some laws to take over the Russia national money. They have a chance to do bad things to provoke China too for the Taiwan issue, find excuse for sanctions and then took away China's assets.

@yaoliang1580

6 ай бұрын

Desperados will not hesitate to do anything to save themselves from financial collapse

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

China's assets are getting less and less, and China's trade is diversifying - I think it's the end of the line for the USA but the end might be messy, very messy!

@Elementaldomain

6 ай бұрын

As someone said to me today…”If China wanted to take over Taiwan, it would be over in 24 hours”. Round eyes, well so many of them, think of wars only in the context of U.S. historical concepts….for China….it would be a minor murmur. More than likely, not even a weapon fired 😂. And BTW, it’s not 34 trillion. It’s 432 trillion. U.S. GDP numbers are a scam…..they do NOT include ongoing liabilities.

Jerry huge respect to you, telling the truth.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you World Peace and also the 26 people who "liked" this comment

I totally agree with you, Jerry. I think China is not interested to attack US home soil unless devastatingly provoked, & there will not be any arousal which may lead to the building up of morale of Americans to support a major war with China. On defence of its own homeland, China is super strong with its military force & US's attacking force will have to face unbearable loss once it enters the area close to the first island chain off the coastline of China. The combat radius of US aircraft carrier group is only about 1,000 km, but China's hypersonic missile systems are undefendable within 1,500 km off the country's coastline. US will not take the risk to make any foolish move. Japan, South Korea & even Philippines, although perhaps forced to be submissive to US orders, will absolutely know what devastating consequences to their home soils will be brought into if they stupidly enter into wars with China for something which they have no business with.

@ubermenschen3636

6 ай бұрын

China’s military is defensive. China has no nuke carriers, no Long range bomber, and no amphibious assault ships - all of which USA has to the max. You have some interesting idea but no well thought out.

@fatdoi003

6 ай бұрын

unlike u.s, china always have endgame on their military activities..... invading u.s the endgame is armageddon for humanity and chinese ain't that stupid to do that

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

True and the stupid "experts" keep saying China hasn't even built the correct navy for it's onw strategic goals - but China's strategic goals are defence and the navy is perfect for that!

@Anonymous------

6 ай бұрын

​@@ubermenschen3636 Former UN weapon inspector and current military political analyst Scott Ritter says aircraft carriers are not as practical in this age of modern warfare, they were designed for old fashion WW2 but not the coming WW3. He even laughs at the presence of USA's aircraft carriers in the Middle East, he says just a few drones can destroy them. China has hypersonics which will be the most decisive weapon in the coming wars.

@freedumb_3.0

6 ай бұрын

Recently, there's been close to 50k Mandarin speaking military age Chinese men that has crossed from Mexico to the US. Corpo MSM is spinning this as young men who are escaping Communist China, and the US military can use these men to fill the US military shortage. Call me a tin foil hatter, but 50k military age men is an army. Looks to me like China is setting their chess pieces and waiting for the US to make a foolish move.

prof. Wolff said, the sophisticated weapons, tanks and military equipment that America has are only for "Parades" and not for conventional war...

@ZhenYae

6 ай бұрын

Like his lecture on Socialism.😊

@glumour3081

6 ай бұрын

@@ZhenYae yups... American Marxianism discussing with Prof. Michael Hudson about China and USA...

@ZhenYae

6 ай бұрын

​@@glumour3081. Only to be countered by one Dr Turley for the Red half of the US of A. In my opinion, he fell way short. It is corporate America that is killing not just the USA but Western EU too.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

He's probably right but that doesn't mean China isn't ready to defend - he's right in that they aren't ready to attack because China has now attacking force

@Elementaldomain

6 ай бұрын

Sophisticated weapons? Well, maybe if you are talking 1940. The U.S. still only has supersonic weapons…and their last hypersonic AND ICBM tests…..failed again. Even DPRK has hypersonic weapons now. They just tested their hypersonic underwater missiles this week. The U.S. is probably a decade away from coming close to building anything like SARMAT. Even Iran has more advanced weaponry than the U.S.

There is no reason to go to war. China does not interfere in other country's internal matters. China has developed to a strong self standing country. Foreign diplomates visit Beijing one after another on their own initiative, relations stay cold. Thanks for sharing your views.

@ZhenYae

6 ай бұрын

​@@johnsonofthunder1026Then, Australian investment is intrusive as well. Dink Dink.

@larsnystrom6698

6 ай бұрын

@aizhongwen You expect Neocons to be rational? To need a reason for war? Japan seems to be a willing proxy. It has been a long 70 years since the last one. And India is jealous of the Chinese progress,.. There are always polititians willing to do stupid things not in the interest of their own country. Just look at the EU, especially Germany, for a prime example. Countries with US military bases seems most prone to do stupid things. Watch out for those!

@VampireA-Oni

6 ай бұрын

@@larsnystrom6698 If Japan goes to war, this will be a blood debt to be repaid. India will have to travel through the Himalaya which will be a disaster on its own. The phippo has the most incentive especially with its current president, son of the ex-president who escape to the US after deposed.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I've removed Johnsonof Thunder from the channel, he's a troll who is being very disruptive and offensive

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Japan is willing at a governmental level but not at the local level, the same as Taiwan, the people don't want war, Australia the same - it will onl last as long as the election cycle! Cuntries with US bases don't have much choice, that's why US bases remain there!!!

So well spoken that it's entertaining.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you

@Elementaldomain

6 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799you made my day. Even though in the end, our opinions don’t change anything…..still, it’s so darn nice just to see someone else voice the obvious truth. Here, on the many forums I frequent here in the U.S. just to gauge the “temperature” of the consciousness and whether it is changing….still there are only minor uptakes. Today for instance, on Zerohedge, the comments were a flood in response to Trumps proposed import tariff on China….you’d be surprised how many people think a factory can be built in the U.S…….at warp speed. I kid you not. The comments were awash with fantastical statements that “it is easy” (actual comments) to make the U.S. a great industrial giant again. It would literally be a decade, minimum, for plans to be approved….construction….and even more importantly….training. Obviously many people have not had the interest in seeing what a fiasco the TSMC plant in Arizona has become. 😂 Anyway, thanks again for an outstanding, amusing, truthful, take on the state of the U.S. military. Most people here still think the U.S. won WW2. 🤡🤮

Very well, Jerry speaking the truth thank you 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳

FREE TRADE IS A WESTERN PROPAGANDA

@benjiang9789

6 ай бұрын

When China refused to do business with the West 100 years ago, the Western powers broke into China. Now, the West is the biggest market for Chinese products, and the US politicians want to decouple it! Isn't it sarcastic?

A lot of countries, especially the US and the West would like to see China go into war with another country. China would not go into war with any country unless China is invaded. This happened many times. Since 1949, China has defeated every invasion, but never invaded any other country. This is very much different from the US and the West.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

You're right, China has no aspirations for war

@MetaView7

6 ай бұрын

They are too smart to get themselves entangled in other people's agendas. They are good traders; they would trade until the last dollar of profit, and then they would pack up and leave with a poker face. They are 100% ready for disengagement (or whatever de-xx you want to call it). After they had closed the door behind them, you could still hear the dog bark a few more times, then the eerie silence that the world had not heard in a long time.

I appreciate your analysis and hope the people that need to hear this do listen.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks, this is why I like the shares, please feel free to share widely - thank you

I agree with you that it’s very unlikely that China would ever fire the first shot and if China does not react adversely to any or all of US provocations, war can’t happen. It takes two to fight. There’s only one caveat though and that is Taiwan declaring independence. What actions that Taiwan take would constitute a declaration of independence by China is anyone’s guess. Perhaps this is China’s version of strategic ambiguity. The Pelosi provocation has shown that China has a high level of tolerance to US gamesmanship. There was a positive for China there. It provided a cover for China to test how it could potentially blockade Taiwan, something it could not do otherwise. In my view US has tried to involve South Korea and Japan but without success. It courts Vietnam and again with little results to show for. And so the US has shifted further south to Philippines. The Second Thomas Shoal has every potential to become a flash point and I hope water cannons are the only weapons being used.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Taiwan won't declare independence, it would be the most foolish folly they could do because 80% of people in Taiwan consider themselves Chinese, to declare independence is to give up being part of the greatest culture in global history - no Taiwan government will ever consider that - and, if the US forced a government leader to do so, that leader would be ousted in a few days and China would take back the island without a shot

@benjiang9789

6 ай бұрын

Taiwan doesn't have to declare independence because it has been claiming itself as a nation.

@benjiang9789

6 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799 Well said, Jerry! You look Caucasian but inside you are more Chinese.

Yes , I agree with you, Jerry. China is focusing more on economics relation, trade and investment with other countries unless you trigger war with China.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

You're right, they will defend - even I will help!

You are 100% correct in your logical analysis! Thank you!

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks Nancy, let's hope I'm right too!

I agree!

Well done Jerry. Spot on.

Thanks as always Jerry for speaking the truth.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you again Ron

Wow that's the amazing take on the subject !!! Very impressed and you are surely giving us a logical & meaningful information. Thank you Jerry !!! 🙏🙏🙏

Sadly your argument is rational - but ideologues are not driven by rational thought; they are driven by ideology - and, in the case of neocon war machine, monetary profit. It is clear from the latest election results in Taiwan that the people have voted to maintain the status quo with the central government - so not much joy there for the US war machine. The one area where China appears at risk is the ME where the US seems to be provoking a wider conflict in the hope of disrupting oil shipments to China, thereby dragging China into some sort of engagement in this latest US / UK supported debacle. I rather suspect that the Chinese have this move covered - after all they, unlike the West, play Go, not Draughts. I hope so.

@RedPanda450

6 ай бұрын

China has no reason to fight in the Middle East/West Asia.

@yaoliang1580

6 ай бұрын

I agree with most of your remarks except that the main reason for this potential war with China has nothing to do with difference in ideology but is purely economics as the US n its vassal states r no longer able to compete on equal terms with China

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

What the US might try to provoke in the Middle East is now, more likely to be preented by the United Nations - the US has decided the UN is not to be followed, the UN has only one optino in my opinion and that is to call on the "international community" to stop Israel, the US thinks it leads the International Community but the US actually does - who will win? The US has 30-40 countries on its side, the rest of the world is the international community - we are in for a VERY turbulent time

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I think you're right Yao Liang, and the amazing thing is that now, for the first time on 70 years the UN agrees with us

@user-sf1nq9uj7p

4 ай бұрын

I believe that China has other options opened at this time - such as getting their oil and gas supplies (cheap) from Russia. In fact, a pipeline is being constructed at this time which will bring oil and gas to China should the ME supplies be threatened. China isn't placing all of its eggs in one basket, that's for sure.

Thanks for sharing and surfacing the truth. 👏👍

Dear Jerry. You are spot on again, mate. Thank you for speaking your mind which happens to be the truth. Stay safe. Looking forward to more of your videos.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you, I will and there wil always be another video aroind the corner, one more coming out tomorrow evening

Great insights. Thanks

Well reasoned piece and spot on facts. Let's hope desperation doesn't drive the Beltway blob into epically irrational actions, but seeing deep and widespread corruption in all sectors of our society, I can't dismiss the oligarchs employing new and grander foreign wars to distract the people so they could retain power. Confucius said evil leaders are ones who would rather let the country burn down and rule over an ash heap than give up power. Unfortunately, that's the kind of leaders we see in Washington and other Western Capitals these days. Even more sad is the thought world events will get worse before they get better. Much worse. On that note, praise The Lord and pass the ammunition.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Well said Tony

Well said! I couldn't have said it better myself, James from Canada

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you James... I know where you are :-))

That’s why I push for closer economic ties. As you mentioned, people making money don’t want to lose it. Closer U.S. China business ties makes war much less likely.

@user-sf1nq9uj7p

4 ай бұрын

Business people want to make money - lots of it and the more, the better. Politicians especially those that think that they are ageing warriors want to start battles to show that they still have their "manhood".

US knows China is not 20 or 30 yrs ago. Or else Uncle Sam will put their aircrafts carriers in China ports and means "Business"😂

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

True Winston, they aren't brining their carriers anywhere near China right now - there's a very good reason for that...

Thank you for explaining it so clearly. More people in the west should watch this and hopefully they'll snap out of it.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I wish more would see it Michael but when I see anti-China lies hitting 3 or 4 million views and am pleased when one of mine hits 10,000 views, there's clearly an imbalance and it's unlikely the people who need to see this will ever get to see it This is why the shares are so important

@Elementaldomain

6 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799Honestly, I think it’s a losing battle. The ignorance is so next level, it’s almost impossible for me to wrap my head around it. There is little interest here in the West, for the most part, of people wanting to spend time to learn the truth. I see it as the ultimate Emperor with no clothes moment……a good many people in the U.S. simply can’t cognize that they aren’t superior to everyone else on the planet. It’s literally driving them insane. Just today someone said to me…”that the U.S. will decimate Iran”. What century are these people living in? Iran is a member of BRICS, has more weaponry than almost any country, and even more importantly…..they have a million Muslims that will.not.quit…..are running around in tennis shoes and baseball caps and blowing up Israeli tanks with RPG’s in Gaza ….if that is happening in Gaza what do they think will happen if they attack Iran…..have the people not learned anything from the Afghanistan situation? We DO NOT want to take on the ME. I saw a vid last week, a young man in sandals…ran up to a Israeli tank, knocked on the turret, attached a IED to it, ran back a few steps and let loose with his RPG. Geez….and our purple haired kids, Navy Seals who fall off a rubber boat and drown…..want to fight these guys? Do the people in the U.S. not realize you also do.not.want to take on the Chinese military? I know a lot of them…..they are like super human. 😊

It all depends on how desperate.

True facts from Jerry. Keep it up

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks Frankie

All good points, very logical; BUT that is the weakness - not in logic but as a predictor : assuming that the US (and 'allies') behave logically; of that I am far from certain.

@BeijingBuzzz-China-Travel

6 ай бұрын

Were any of its previous wars reasoned ??

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Agreed, there isn't any logic, is there!!!

I totally agree with you man ✊✊✊👍👍👍

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks Paul

I agree with you wholeheartedly!

Hope sheep 🐑 will wake up, by your messages.

Dont under-estimate the greed of certain people, Jerry.

The question should be "Will China or Russia be the one ruins Mystery Babylon?". 😅

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I'm not sure if you're referring to the biblical or the Sci-Fi Babylon but one thing I know from experience, it won't be China that ruins anything, and I very much doubt Russia has plans beyond what they are currently doing

Wonderful Jerry. You are right about everything. Thank you.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks Ray

Excellent points Jerry. Great work.

Thank you Jerry for this train of thought it is very reassuring and I do hope this will be the case and that there will be no war.

Excelent analysis as always, Thank you Jerry

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Much appreciated Maniaouri, thank you

Can't argue against that kind of reasoning.

The evolving developments in the Middle East will likely be watched in many parts of the world; especially if Iran is involved. If Iran is attacked, it is most likely China and Russia will be dragged indirectly into the conflict.

@monipenny408

6 ай бұрын

I hope Russia and China will at least supply the weapons needed, clearly it's gonna be a war of attrition. U$UK will never stop instigating conflicts in all regions. It is up to humanity to stop these 2 vilest of all nations on earth.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I honestly doubt China will be dragged into an Iran conflict, although I suspect it's what USA wants

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Agreed, I don't think either will get dragged in, but both will support Iran

@matthewn9417

6 ай бұрын

​ @jerrystakeonchina799 The censors are busier these days knowing “big Satan” looking the other way, when “little One” is committing genocide.

As veteran l have experienced the inhumanity of war, any future conflict could see the end of civilization as we know it.....

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing Brian

I totally agree with you, Jerry. There would not be a hot war between the United States (with its allies) and China. That is notwithstanding the jingoistic posturing drummed up by Washington. The idea of the United States-led NATO ganging up with the likes of Australia, Japan, Korea, and India to encircled and fight China is at best a delusional goal. Apart from superior military assets, the will to fight is the single most important deciding factor in war. The will to fight is the determination to fight, and to keep fighting, and to win. The Korean War, the Vietnam War and Afghanistan were great examples where the U.S. and its allies were soundly trounced, despite their overwhelming superiority in military assets. But up against the resolve of the Chinese people to unite their country, and industrial might of modern China, a lackadaisical military alliance of those countries you had mentioned does not have a ghost of a chance to defeat China should a war broke out. When push comes to shove, none of these countries, will be standing shoulder to shoulder with the U.S. to fight the formidable PLA. Gripped by a convoluted feeling of fear and jealousy of China’s rise is one thing. But to fight China is another. Down to the core, not only does China poses no existential threats to anyone’s survival, it provides tremendous business opportunities to the rest of the world. The fact that China contributes some 30% of the global economic growth underscores its central role in the world economic system.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Don't forget Australia in there, for some reason, Australians seem to think China is knocking on their door with an invasive force - it's crazy I know but so many people including intelligent people actually believe it

@user-sf1nq9uj7p

4 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799 "Intelligent" people may not be the SMARTEST in the block nor those imbued with WISDOM. I have met many intellectuals who just read the headlines and are influenced by them instead of diving into the details and checking the "facts" - because they mostly don't have the time available for what they consider to be irrelevant to them, being far too engrossed in their other intellectual pursuits. However, when they are confronted with the facts and the salient points are made known to them, they are less likely to be pedantic, more willing to discuss the subject openly and accept the real truth when it is dawned upon them. This is where the difference between "intelligent" and "not-so-intelligent" people is at.

My understanding is that Eisenhower didn't want Vietnam to have elections after they won independence because "Dey might go Commie" 😜 More recently, the reunited country of Vietnam has gone down the exact Socialist path they weren't supposed to. They've even taken a page from China's economic development program and are doing quite well with it. Is that what you've heard as well, Jerry?

@monipenny408

6 ай бұрын

Western vulture capitalism is like a cancer, it will eventually consume everything in its path.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Vietnam was never going to go the way the US wanted them to go because they were always a Commuinst country - I don't think there was any disappointment outside of US media that Vietnam went Communist Kevin, they fought 40 years against France and then the USA to become Communist and now, the US wants that communist country as their friend because it suits them to hurt a bigger coomunist country to the north

Agreed with you.

On the other hand, never under estimate the power of stupid.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

This is true!

Convincing arguments. Bought!

You gave an opinion (s) backed up by evidence (facts) and I for one could not dispute what you said. I would love to know what the president of Ukraine has signed with the Americans with regards to repayment. The USA did the same to the UK in 1941 and we were still paying for it in the 1990's when we finally paid it off. By the way Gweilo has just reached a 100k subscribers.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Good for Gweilo, he's a nice guy and I was really saddened by his news. As for the Ukraine, I think it's a matter of public record that Monsanto, Blackrock and a couple of others now own much of the assets of Ukrain - pretty sad for Ukrainians

@anthonymathews3872

6 ай бұрын

Thanks for the reply. Alas we are sitting on a time bomb.@@jerrystakeonchina799

Thank you very much🙏👍🙏

👍👍

Thank you for the video. Very thought-provoking. It's so true that the potential US-proxys are thinking of the weak support to Ukraine. It's just there in the open view: The Empire abandons its proxys when things go wrong. But (always a but) in the particular case of the Occupied-Korea-State, aka South Korea, it's a US-colony, with troops enough to puppet that government into reigniting the Korean War. That's the possible Ukraine that worries me right now.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I don't think Russia will settle for a US controlled or occupied Ukraine in the same way China did with Korea - remember the Korean War is on hold, it's not officially over yet and that's exactly how the US likes it - it's all about selling more weapons through the ongoing tensions - I personally don't think USA wants a war with China, they just push to the point where all China's neighbours are afraid it will happen and the US will sell them "protection"

You share the geopolitical worldview of the Nobel Peace Prize winner who argued that the integration of the economies of the world powers had grown to such a degree that war between them would be entirely futile and is therefore practically impossible. His name was Norman Angell and his argument became widespread just a few years before the World War 1.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Unfortunately he turned out to be wrong and we had WW1 and then WW2, it really was catastrophic wasn't it!

I’d argue that US is actually quite good at winning battles but not necessarily winning wars because winning a war requires meeting its overall objectives. So what would be US’ objectives of going to war with China?

As always, Jerry's take is always interesting if not eye opening 👍

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Glad you think so, thank you

杰瑞好样的！你是中国最后一个西方真理之声。希望我知道如何更好地增强你的能力。我照原样向你致敬✌️

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you, just keep reading, watching and sharing is the best way to empower me

Your takes are always on the nose and informative. Thank you, Jerry!

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank YOU Henry

You are a clever guy. 👍👍👍

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks

Beautifully articulated 🎉

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you kindly Shaun

Wars make lots of money for the United Snakes defense industries. 😢

You've said it all, Jerry. I can't think of any reason why there'll be a war, even with my very befuddled mind right now.

Well said

Great post, Jerry! I hope some conscionable publications in the US would pick this up. It really is the summary of the US futilities as far as war goes in the past half century.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I doubt we'll find many places in the US to pick this up, I get published in Australia from time to time though - feel free to link it to any publication you think might want to use it - I'm happy with that and it's a free column for them - I don't charge for my work

Your argument is very rational, but unfortunately most people are not rational in my experience, so that makes the chances of war significantly higher.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Sadly, you're right - but then again, war is never a rational answer and China knows this

Right 👍

In the meantime, the U.S. will keep fighting a war of words… (It is losing there too!)

Very good point

China is building and enlarging its military capability not that they want to go to war or bully anyone but to keep itself and in some way, the world at large safe.

Jerry, yet another cool calm and evidenced based presentation.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Cheers Mike

The US was weak in Vietnam, even now retreated from Afghanistan despite with useless NATO with 30+ allies. The US is weaker now.

@user-sf1nq9uj7p

4 ай бұрын

A wounded and weak Great White Pointer (shark) can still take a huge chunk of flesh from your body or a leg or an arm. The U.S. may be weaker than it ever was but it can still tear off that arm and a leg as it goes down.

TQVM to Jerry for this brilliant analysis which I totally concur.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks Joseph

@hongqingxiang3374

5 ай бұрын

🙏+1🙏

Liked and shared 👍

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you

@ferryrustandi944

6 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799you’re welcome 👍

Jerry, I agree with you on all, with just one caveat. There is no lack of elected leaders of a place that, for his/her own interests, will do the bidding of the puppet-master, disregarding the interests of the citizens. Ukraine is a clear example of that, and Japan/Korea/Philippines have similar leaders. The difference with Ukraine is of course China is way more powerful militarily than these potential proxies, and NATO can't supply arms easily to them due to the difficult logistics, besides the lack of money and ammunition for yet another war-front. So, yes, I agree that war with China is less likely. Just sharing thoughts

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Good thoughts too, thank you, that's the beauty of an opinion piece, it elicits other opinions that I might not have thought of - we could both be right, we could both be wrong but we agree that there are differences in our opinions based on our different experiences

This is one of the greatest roasts of the US I've ever seen. Damn.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you, there are plenty more like it in my back library of videos

😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ Jerry, love your channel and analysis. Peace on earth !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why WAR??? A war you just clearly cannot win ......

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Great Question - they can't win, which is why they won't start it - but they want to escalate tensions so they can profit from them!

USA needs to keep their word in dialogue with China then the world is in peace🥰

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Wouldn't that be nice Danielle!

Hi Jerry, I like your videos, but you need better thumbnails, in my opinion. Catchy and easy to understand thumbnails = more views. But keep on the good work!

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thank you - I'm no expert at these things, I'll keep working on it and if you have suggestions, I'll be willing to consider them

@Elementaldomain

6 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799 My problem is that I often want to share one of your videos on TT in response to anti Chinese comments made to my comments, but often your titles are a little too general for me to remember which of your videos I wanted. Today’s title is a really good title. ❤

I don't believe China will start a hot war with Taiwan, even if they choose to declare independence. The Chinese government can implement a whole host of sanctions on Taiwan without putting a single live at risk. Severe trade and economic sanctions would be the first salvo, with additional measures such as partial or full naval blockade to follow. These measures can be kept in place for years if not decades, just look at the American sanctions on Cuba.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Indeed but I suspect it won't take long for China to change Taiwan's stance, because the vast majority of people on Taiwan don't want it - three will never be a hot invasion and thee will never, in my or your lifetime be a declaration of independence either

It is a good explanation you have given, Sir. Let's hope the rest of the World understands to give peace and wisdom space to grow. We live in communities, and we are somehow socially conscious about living together and working together on this planet called Earth.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks David

As always, you are so right Jerry. Even in the unlikely event that the USA decides to start a war with China, that action will incite China's neighbours to step on the plate simply because they know well that they can be next. The American war machine knows that prospect very well and they already realized that in the end the whole world will be destroyed, along with the land of the free and brave. At my age (75) I don't have many hopes of seeing all the achievements that China is trying so hard to make possible all over the world. Instead, I only hope that our children will be wise enough to realize that all these crazy wars are not the solution. Keep the good work amigo. Greetings from Toronto.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Thanks Jorge, it seems to me that, even at your age - and I'm not that far behind you - we've seen the rise of something spectacular, when we were kids China was among the poorest nations earth - it proves that any country can do it, all they need is great leadership and wouldn't North America be great if they had the same calibre of leadership?

America won 1 war...... Grenada 😮

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Are you sure they won? I only read in Western media that they did - which doesn't make it true!

Here is the huge question that nobody has asked: Why did the USA appear to pull out after invading other countries (Vietnam, Afghanistan, etc) and amassing such devastating collateral damage (infrastructure, lives - children and adults, food production, etc)? Maybe it was never about winning a war... so much as supporting their military industrial complex, i.e., to provide the needed American public taxpayer dollars to support that business(es), replace military armaments with the latest and greatest advanced weapons, gears, planes, vehicles, submarines, etc.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Agreed, a great question, the US have proven that winning isn't what the war is about, obviously, they don't like pulling out either because that's bad for business unless there's another one in the pipeline - hence we had Ukraine immediately after and before that finished Gaza escalations start - it's a pattern for sure

@Chinook-tj9bv

6 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799 It is about war profiteering at the expense of the American taxpayers... never mind the harm and suffering that they inflict on the countries that they invade and occupy.

@user-sf1nq9uj7p

4 ай бұрын

It's all about making money for the corporations in the Military Industrial Complex alliance and for certain high end politicians to become millionaires through shareholdings in those companies as well as have a cushy seat in their Board of Directors when they retire from politics. Having proxy wars and scaring the pants off smaller, militarily weaker countries enable the U.S. MIC to sell billions upon billions of military hardware to those countries. It's all business and everything is fair in love, business and war.

agree

I agree with your Jerry. Ryan Clark Watt

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Hi Ryan, thank you

The US model is win-lose; it is not about building up itself but on crushing all others. Look at the stark contrast between how the US views itself and reality. This is not a rational actor, so reasoned arguments don't apply. Sad but true. Jerry could easily do a part 2 with a different perspective. Let's all hope that part 1 view is more correct, but there are many reasons to be far more worried (and China increasingly understands this).

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

You're right, if I was in a debate on this topic, I rthink I could be on the winning team either side of the debate, there are so many options - this is just my take on it

I am still really afraid of false flag attacks.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I think the issue with false flags is that they work on people who weren't expecting them - the entire world is watching for a false flag here - let's see how it works and even then, if it's in the Chinese sphere, the flag will create a reaction on the part of the offended country, probably the Philippines or Vietnam but China won't over-react to their obvious reaction - the flag will be defused beyond the initial attack, the reaction to it and then it should stop because China will know they didn't do the first and they will demonstrate to the offending country how it was another party - China is cleverer than the West in so many ways, they's all read Sun Tzu too

@punimarudogaman

6 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799 Thank you for your analysis, Jerry. I'm also afraid of biological weapons. In 2001, the anthrax envelopes were used to blame Iraq (even though they came from a laboratory in Maryland (source: Wikipedia)) Biological weapons could be ideal for weakening China and damaging its international image, without risking a military or nuclear response, as it is impossible to prove the origin of such an attack. I imagine that the "Empire" is not crazy enough to drop a very lethal virus on a target... not without first performing a "stress test" with a less dangerous virus to test both the opponent and the allied health defenses (especially the allied defense, because this is the only risk with this type of weapon: a virus that becomes uncontrollable) ... I will not push this reflection further because... as you know... it could end up leading us to consider some hypotheses that are absolutely taboo in the West... You see what I mean.

@punimarudogaman

6 ай бұрын

Only one thing is sure : bio weapons do exist. - Russian found labs in Ukraine - Stuart McMillan " biowarfare over cuban skies " , The Matoban, February 25, 1998 - From 1946 to 1948, the CIA used syphilis to infect hundreds of soldiers, prostitutes, prisoners and children in Guatemala. - In 1950, the CIA sprayed nosocomial disease with aerosols from a warship on San Francisco Bay. - In 1955 the CIA sprayed whooping cough bacteria on Tampa beach (Florida). - In 1956 the army released millions of mosquitoes contaminated with dengue fever and yellow fever on the island of Savannah, Georgia and Avon Park, Florida. - In 1966: the CIA propelled bacteria hidden in light bulbs in the heart of the New York subway - Japanese army made many researches to develop bio weapons during WW2. After the war, the US did not destroy the labs. They took the results of those researches for themselves during operation "paperclip". Most of those informations are coming from a documentary made by the french television " Les cobayes de la CIA " (2015) by Olivier Pighetti Do not hesitate to double check by yourself if those informations are right. We must always verify before trusting or spreading such informations Take care.

I really hope there will be no war. It will be bad for human kind and the world. I also hope Philippine people knows what is going on and pressure president Marcos from going overboard.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Unfortunately with a 6 year election cycle, Marcos still has over 4 more years in power - I can't see it ending well for the lovely people of the Philippines

Hi Jerry, Many thanks for all your content 😊 i was thinking to move to China with my bussiness, can you mąkę a video with some tips, Many thanks

@jerrystakeonchina799

5 ай бұрын

There are so many questions before I can answer that one Sandra, I'm certainly not the expert to be talking to about it but if you email me some details about your business, depending on what the business is, I might be able to ask someone with experience in the field to help you herry_grewy2002@yahoo dot com dot au

@sandromaia265

5 ай бұрын

@@jerrystakeonchina799 i Will do it todas, Many thanks for the help 😉

I remember a book that explains it.. the book of Graham Allison the title is "Destined for war" Can the US and China Avoid Thucydides Trap

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Yes indeed they can, the one mistake the Thucydides trap forgets is culture, China is not a Western culture and they don't think, or act like westerners do.

Thumbs up 👍 Great perspective

Totally agree with you based on the very reasons that you so clearly articulated, Jerry. IMHO, there's a very possibility of "an accidental war" wherein... with so much of the so-called "freedom of navigation" provocations and the likes e.g. Canada's rickety Orion "near intrusion" into Chinese airspace, etc., an accident may / could occur ... giving the excuse to some crazed "colonel" on either side to trigger a wider and potentially "total" war. Possible? Thanks and regards Richard

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

I think you might be right Richard, the worry is the "accident" not the planned attack

Any war small or big with China is for a long run and even for a short run is disadvantage for any countries big or small.The reason being this modern China is not the same as China 15 years ago

Just one thing to say : I just hope you are right. I really do

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Me too!

One more reason : The Americans are afraid of Chinese down from their heart.

@jerrystakeonchina799

6 ай бұрын

Quite likely but I'll bet we can't find one who will admit it!