When you realize losing stability due to comets was actually a thing irl

@bluefacebaby9334

3 жыл бұрын

Ace Combat Fans: 👀

@HansLemurson

3 жыл бұрын

Stop looking at the sky!

@moonwolf8470

3 жыл бұрын

@@HansLemurson Oooooooh it burns

@hiddentreasure2161

3 жыл бұрын

"I wish we lived in more enlightened times.."

@Sovietube

3 жыл бұрын

eu4 moment

The Chinese army at that time resembled an internal security reserve force than actual army. They didn’t live on a base but in towns, only trained with their own unit of company size. Typical mission was occasional call up to fight bandits. Weapons were swords and spears with a few matchlocks. It’s like saying how come the police can’t win battles.

@RIFLQ

3 жыл бұрын

So it's like modern China as well

@voxpopuli7910

3 жыл бұрын

@@RIFLQ LOL

@johnyricco1220

3 жыл бұрын

@@RIFLQ That’s what MacArthur thought in 1951

@brandonn.1275

3 жыл бұрын

@rimacutem of Alsvartrsmiðr Which costed them their imperial holdings after ww2 and gave the US both a massive post war golden age and control over European defense policy through NATO.

@joshuabonilla3491

3 жыл бұрын

@@RIFLQ I would say modern China has come a long way compared to the Qing, their military and government is far more centralized then their Qing counter parts and also the opposite of isolationists. From what I have read they are more of the American system now they have a professional main force with a reserve element kinda like the national guard them military police elements.

Simple answer: the Qing Dynasty didn't have a strong enough navy. Beginning in the 19th Century they still employed junks and sail ships while other European powers had steamships. Just look at the First and Second Opium War.

@user-gf5oy5wz9n

2 жыл бұрын

The Ming Dynasty had a strong navy, but it was a historical pity that it did not invade Europe

@Dorrzo

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-gf5oy5wz9n China has always been and always will be a paper tiger

@boomboomboom9297

2 жыл бұрын

They were Manchus. Good at riding horses>

@user-gf5oy5wz9n

2 жыл бұрын

@@Dorrzo Fool

@michaelpettersson4919

2 жыл бұрын

Compare to what Japan did once they realised that they had fallen behind.

"Why is this place always on fire?" -everyone who's tried to rule China in the last three thousand years

@rickyh695

2 жыл бұрын

I heard this from a chinese from china, he said during ancient times central plain they were raided because of natural resources and that piece of large land were flat without much mountain perfect for population growth. They mostly just wanted central plain. Modern times of course it all about money and resources.

@rickyh695

2 жыл бұрын

For the mongol, they want everywhere under their banner. China happen to be close by.

@hannibalburgers477

2 жыл бұрын

@@rickyh695 I am one of the descentants of raider tribes and I can assure that it's 90% true. Other 10 percent is the subserviant lower class population of china. They are easier to conquer, the problem is that they are so numerous, whomever conquered those land gets assimilated similar to those who conquer Persia. (I dare ya', I dare anybody who read this, give me a name that conquered persia, hold it for more than a century, and did not accepted their customs)

@mojewjewjew4420

2 жыл бұрын

@@hannibalburgers477 Same is true for Rome,most of the invaders got assimilated or adopted many of their customs.

@lukelarssen7072

2 жыл бұрын

geography plus culture. The conflict between population and land. 王侯将相宁有种乎？

Incompetent general is more dangerous than powerful enemies

@carlrodalegrado4104

3 жыл бұрын

Incompetent Allies are more dangerous than Competent enemies

@marcosffontes

3 жыл бұрын

TRUE.

@butterskywalker8785

3 жыл бұрын

@@carlrodalegrado4104 *cough cough* ww2 *cough cough* Italy

@Saeronor

3 жыл бұрын

_Too_ competent general can be even more dangerous, though.

@user-fz3ud8jm8r

3 жыл бұрын

I can't believe that us Koreans were even more pathetic and weaker than this China.

They had low mandate +50% fire and shock dmg is no joke

@Nietabs

3 жыл бұрын

Is this some Hoi4 meme? cuz I don't played that game

@JoaoSantos-ey2xq

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nietabs eu4

@Pausi10_00

2 жыл бұрын

Jeah and hords a complitly OP

@hareezkaikyou

2 жыл бұрын

Casus Belli acquired: "Take the Mandate of Heaven"

@sid2112

2 жыл бұрын

@@Nietabs HOI4 is a pretty good game. If you like strategy you'll love it. Nothing better than The American Empire finally invading the British Home Isles because they refused to vacate Aruba.

I think it was a bit of an oversight not to mention that the Ming helped the Koreans significantly in beating off the Japanese in the Imjin War.

@thgentleman9210

3 жыл бұрын

Beating off you say?

@PeterStanton

3 жыл бұрын

@@thgentleman9210 Yes, go ahead and write your fanfic about it, gentleman.

@GandalftheWise

2 жыл бұрын

@@PeterStanton wrong. The KOREANS HELPED THE CHINESE. If they simply allowed the Japanese to pass China would be speaking Japanese. But Admiral Yi Sun Shin had other plans

@xiaochenlong8657

2 жыл бұрын

@@GandalftheWise "The KOREANS HELPED THE CHINESE." by not being conquered by Japan? RIDICULOUS expression. Korea would not exist if Ming refused to send its troops in Liaoning to help Korea defend itself against Japan. More interestingly, this action was considered to accelerate Machurian's rebellion against Ming due to a great loss of the army during the Japanese invasion.

@GandalftheWise

2 жыл бұрын

@@xiaochenlong8657 Korea help China against Japan and against the manchus. Even when they were conquered they continued to help the Ming government

In March 1885, a 67 years old Chinese General called Feng led Qing forces to defeat French General Francois de Negrier's 2nd Brigade which included a battalion of the famous Foreign Legion in the Battle of Bang Bo. The French adminstration under Prime Minister Jules Ferry fell only days after the unexpected defeat. Victories were rare in late Qing but It wasn't all defeats for the Qing Empire.

@jessiehuynh7495

2 жыл бұрын

Tbh defeating the French at that time isn't something to brag about.

@mantea3481

2 жыл бұрын

@@jessiehuynh7495 it is kinda funny seeing france get kicked down by everyone during that time, deservedly so.

@mint8648

Жыл бұрын

@@jessiehuynh7495 it was the second most powerful in the world

@space__idklmao

Жыл бұрын

@@mantea3481 the koreans too

@Kaiserboo1871

Жыл бұрын

@@mint8648 No, that honor goes to the Germans. Who also kicked France’s ass, twice.

It was discovered by the British that in the palace storage was hundreds of firearms that was europe's best. They were given as diplomatic gift by the British years ago, the guns were left untouched , rusting and collecting dust. Qing did not care for firearms but rather only cared for archery, even Ming had better guns.

@erraov9976

3 жыл бұрын

@Paulo Ramos they beat Ming who used firearms back when they were still premature tech, figured Archery was still visible until Qing archers were defeated again and again.

@planetkc

2 жыл бұрын

Source: trust me bro

@erraov9976

2 жыл бұрын

@@planetkc The burning and looting of the old summer palace during the second opium war, the guns were found by British troops along with artworks, jewelry, sculptures, and textiles. Goes to show how they were considered as fancy artifacts.

@yjohn1055

2 жыл бұрын

Sounds unreasonable, the main advantage of Qing over dying Ming would be cannons. If you really do any research, you would discover Qing army's weakness is inflicted by the reliance on firearms which, if not properly trained, does not boost or encourage the morale.

@kirillassasin

2 жыл бұрын

Dude, they just could sneak attack the British “Must be the wind”

Qing has a similar status as the Ptolemaic Egypt, a small amount of foreigners forming a government that dominates a much larger population. As the Ptolemaic dynasty was troubled by the loyalty of local Egyptians through its domination, you can imagine how the Manchus feel when sitting in the Forbidden City.

@yourmathtutor5217

3 жыл бұрын

W u h a n v i r u s spotted

@fedyx1544

3 жыл бұрын

wtf are these responses, did the mental ward suddenly decide to release the two commenters above me?

@christianriddler5063

3 жыл бұрын

@@fedyx1544 Yeah, good question. Total idiots.

@QWERTY-gp8fd

3 жыл бұрын

@@YizhouRong bruh it cant even build toilets

@kauchkauch2272

3 жыл бұрын

I feel bad for Manchus 😔 they had to invade and rule over China to protect Manchuria from the Chinese.

man I've been here since you had less than 10k subs, now I see you at 20x more feelsgreatman

I am re-watching the whole series because you just released the 4th episode which is awesome! :]

I'd love to be in the Room when that Man found out the English "rebels" had far bigger empire than China

@kimok4716

3 жыл бұрын

I don't think it was true in 1839. Plus comparing barren Canada to China kind of doesn't make sense

@ultramarine0123

3 жыл бұрын

@@kimok4716 why, most of China's size was also relatively barren frontier territory, while the British still at the time had a globe spanning empire with actual control of most major global strategic points like the Gibraltar straight, Cape of good hope, and the Malacca straight, as well as most of India all of Bangladesh, with nominal control of Egypt, the reset of India, while also "informal empire" over south America since the Spanish empire collapsed there, just because the two large territorial possessions were in the process of being settled doesn't take away the validity of the claim, especially since Britain was undisputed master of the sea and China could barely maintain its boarders and coastlines

@kimok4716

3 жыл бұрын

@@ultramarine0123 Again I am talking about 1839. At this moment Britain had no control over Egypt, its possessions in Africa were limited to the Cape, not South Africa and I think it only held a few territories in West Africa. Canada and Australia were both lightly populated and Britain's strength came mainly from its mainland, not from overseas territories. I don't know what your informal empire in South America refers to, seems pretty bullshit to me. And control of a few straits isn't enough to go meet the Emperor of China and tell him "sucks to be you". 1919 would have been another conversation however I agree

@ultramarine0123

3 жыл бұрын

@@kimok4716 yes they had no official control over Egypt but at this time Britain had their fingers in a lot of pots and ran countries and territories of declining empires without official control this is where the term informal empire comes form I'd suggest you look up the term as it's quite an interesting topic, but Britain in the 1830s had all it's useful territories for the most part the expansion after this point was painting the map red exercises really, and empires always draw the most strength from its core territories

@Marane8

3 жыл бұрын

@@kimok4716 Britain had no possessions in West Africa at the time. They were lent a coastal fort by the Dutch, but that's it. Even the Port City of Lagos wouldn't come under their control until much later.

Can’t wait for Victoria 3 so I could play Qing

@hyperion6902

3 жыл бұрын

You’ll have to wait for the dlc to have any unique mechanics or flavour though ;)

@ComedyJakob

3 жыл бұрын

Victoria is my favorite concept for any paradox franchise, I just couldn't really get into Vicky 2 so much because it felt so dated to me. I'm really hyped for 3

@michaelthomas5433

3 жыл бұрын

Well until it comes out EU4 might work for that Spanish invasion idea. ?;- )

@user-sl2eu8ho9y

3 жыл бұрын

@Soldat Kaiyodo ＋1

@user-sl2eu8ho9y

3 жыл бұрын

@Soldat Kaiyodo First win the Opium War, then let the revolutionary party come to power.

I think this is your best history video so far Jabzy, ashamed I can only give it one like.

About the same time, Europe also experienced their own Great Clearance, where most of settlements were withdrawn several miles inland. The difference was, it wasn't decreed by any of the European monarch. Instead it's a spontaneous reaction to Ottoman funded Barbary pirates activity, who escalated their operation to rob and enslave people from Southern and Western European coasts.

@amh9494

Жыл бұрын

But only black people were ever enslaved.... Right?😂

The Ming - Mongol conflicts need their own series. Looking over the Tumu crisis and their conflicts with the Mongols, the Ming seemed to have won most of them in mostly defensive battles. Also, one must be wary of exaggerated figures like 500,000 troops for the Ming.

@kingstarscream320

3 жыл бұрын

I’ve found KZread lacking in quality Ming and Qing (especially pre Opium War) videos.

@rohang6213

3 жыл бұрын

@@kingstarscream320 have you checked out extra history

@LucidFL

3 жыл бұрын

Do not ever watch Extra History.

@temuulenbtjgl9498

3 жыл бұрын

@@jtsy7499 how? can you explain to me

@destiny_6204

3 жыл бұрын

@Jimmy Xie you stupid? It was tribute state. Ming China and Korea never fought the war. Joseon Korea actually gained more from the sends tribute to China. During the 200 yrs of peace during Joseon Korea sold many horses to China three times the costs. Even the British send tribute to China.

You've been one of the most uniquely consistent content creators I follow. There's a real charm to the way you produce these videos, everything from the music to the drawings and the way you narrate your stuff. I'm glad you're still presenting this the same way and I'm always looking forward to more.

When the IJA was fighting the Nationalists Army in 30s, they estimated from experience that an IJA battalion was an equal match for a Chinese division. Later, when the nationalists got tons of American weapons that were way superior to the IJA’s, the nationalists started to fair a little better.

@DefeatedRoyalist

Жыл бұрын

If I recall correctly didn’t a Nationalist Division fluctuate greatly in manpower? That is to say, a Chinese Division was not equal to an IJA Division in terms of troop number. I’d assume the warlord centric nature of the Kuomintang had a large part in this discrepancy.

Amazing video. Videos of channel helps linking so many little historical anecdotes together and interesting✨😎‼

I can relate to the Yongzheng Emperor. Always wanted to cosplay as many characters and try out many ethnic clothes.

@Cyltik

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah kinda reminds me of Justin Trudeau 😂

@user-lg8gd8bl5i

3 жыл бұрын

@@Cyltik hahahahahaha

@rishthefish7781

3 жыл бұрын

@@Cyltik Lol hahaha yeah he's super cringe

@solomonkane6442

3 жыл бұрын

@@Cyltik wouldn't Trudeau tell him off for cultural appropriation though ?

@JKTProductionzIncNCo

3 жыл бұрын

@@Cyltik its funny and sad at the same time if you're Canadian.

Hong Xiuquan 洪秀全 didn't really convert to Christianity. He got his hands on some Christian pamphlets and created his own religious system around it after experiencing some sort of mental breakdown. When the Taipings took Nanjing, Westerners made contact with them but did not recognize their movement as a real form of Christianity. As a result, the Western powers preferred to back the Qing empire over the Taiping rebels.

@haidweng7948

3 жыл бұрын

Yes,he claim that he is jesus and didnt get apporved by any major church at all

@Nietabs

3 жыл бұрын

@@haidweng7948 oh yeah that Jesus brother guy

@CoolMan-ig1ol

3 жыл бұрын

@@haidweng7948 *Any major western church.

@JBGARINGAN

3 жыл бұрын

Aw man could you imagine if in an alternate universe where the Teutonic knights when expelled from Livonia by Poland and Lithuania moved to Moscow converted to Protestantism like Brandenburg in our timeline but with Orthodox characteristics and helped the Tsars beat back the golden horde and conquer Siberia and happened upon a landlocked Taiping Heavenly Kingdom and they fight on together with their crazy combination of Christianities in a Jolly crusade toward the sea in coordination with still powerful colonial Spanish Conquestadors and galleons based from the Philippines under direct order of the Pope to supply them up the rivers in a new Far East Holy League united as one against the Qing menace. The Spanish inquisition won't be pleased with having to cooperate with different interpretations of Christianity but they go along with it for the unilateral goal of bolstering christendom in the orient. Hell some American Presbyterian, Quaker, Calvinist, and Baptist preachers by far the most types common western missionaries in our timeline join the crusade. Perhaps the Portuguese even bring over some Abyssinian Orthodox willing to help the cause as well.

@short-leggedturtle1315

3 жыл бұрын

@@JBGARINGAN Yeah it is hard to wrap your mind around some really plausible alternate history scenarios.

Your background music is dope. Has an almost mass effect feel to it. Very informative video man! I'm subscribed

Impressive total overview of recent Chinese history. Wow!👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼🙂 Thanks!!

Survival Guide to Tudor London - kzread.info/dash/bejne/pqlmo86cZ5nUeto.html So I'm trying out a new format. This is part 1 of 3 long videos on China. Next will cover the 19th Century and then the eventual fall and reunification. Next I'm looking to cover things like Scramble for Africa, Japanese, Italian and German plans in the war etc.

@the_powerdirector5315

3 жыл бұрын

Why is this on an Alex the Rambler Video? Why are all the comments here related to Jabzy? I'm not watching Jabzy, what's happening?

@itarry4

3 жыл бұрын

Honestly I prefer the older topics but as always your videos are top notch so I'm sure I'll watch them all and enjoy them.

@minuittt

3 жыл бұрын

love the longer, more in-depth takes. also please never change your art style

@kingstarscream320

3 жыл бұрын

@@Hello-ky9fo When people say “da war” they mean WW2

@kingstarscream320

3 жыл бұрын

Looking forward to the following videos on 19th century China and the Scramble for Africa but have personally had enough WW2 for a lifetime.

By Chinese imperial standards the Qing Emperors as a whole were actually above average. Most of them were politically skilled and trained in the Chinese arts and classics. The Beiyang fleet proved the Chinese had the capital and willpower to acquire modern fleets and arms. What the Chinese lacked was adopting the spirit of modernity and the new rush of ideas that the Japanese successfully did. The latter seriously engaged and analysed Western ideas after the black ship humiliation of commodore Perry, while China never really had that moment of awakening.

@hanselsihotang

3 жыл бұрын

Plus Qing's government was too decentralised, inneficient and corrupt that it became very hard to implement a coherent and coordinated modernization effort. You get some parts that were reasonably modernized (i.e Beiyang Fleet, foreign-trained regional armies and various foreign-backed industrial area) but others not so much. Not too mention the fleet itself was plagued with corruption (by the Empress dowager herself nonetheless), and their fate ended up as the 19th Century punching bag

@Yorosero

3 жыл бұрын

@Uncle Ho The Qing dynasty had a string of good rulers from Kangxi to Yongzheng and then Qianlong. The Ming dynasty went off on a horrible tyrannical start right from the get-go by abolishing the position of grand chancellor and the huge purges from the newly created Dong Chang department. Compared to the previous major Han run dynasties, the Ming are far below the list of my estimation along side of the Han, Tang, and Song dynasties.

@royhuang9715

3 жыл бұрын

More like China had the moment (aka opium wars) but China being a much much bigger country with 6-7 times more people than Japan. It’s harder for them to reform. Qing dynasty did try, and managed to gain some success. They did manage to kick start industrialization in China. But the decentralized effort was impossible to mobilize entire China. And the fall of Qing dynasty slowed down the progress, since warlords need to invest most of their income in fighting other warlords.

@Melcor2304

2 жыл бұрын

@@royhuang9715 It would have been possible if guangxu was alive, and cixi pretty much killed off that hope, and placed a puppet emperor on the throne.

@hughmungus2760

2 жыл бұрын

which is why people are freaking out about the PRC today. 1949 was that awakening and alot of countries are terrified of what would happen when china becomes number 1 again.

This is a heck lot of work involved. Well done! It's great to listen to genuine historical facts. Once politics is not involved, the comment section is peaceful and sound.

Great video, very informative. Thank you

you forget that the tributary system is basically a trade because the tributary states have to send gifts but china have to give back bigger gifts to those countries so to show off wealth and power. if you don't mention this point it's a little misleading.

@ssrbgangimaribotan6thofthe12

3 жыл бұрын

but because of this system those smaller countries have to listen to china when they intervene in their civil war or wars between tributary countries. so to mediate "peace", especially for countries closer to china, the further they are the less china would do anything as long as they provide tributes, (just like in yuan dynasty when the mongols invades java, indonesia to demand tributes). however yuan dynasty of the mongols have different tributary systems, they require slaves, women, and others while not providing gifts back to the other countries, that's why a lot of countries resisted against mongols' demand of tribute before they conquered southern song dynasty (which is a militarily weakened china with just the south part, but prospers in literature and scientific progress)

@capmidnite

3 жыл бұрын

Like the USA spending way more money protecting its NATO and East Asian (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan) allies than it actually gets back from them. Those countries LOVE the status quo of being under US military protection, while publicly grumbling about the US being the world's policeman.

@ssrbgangimaribotan6thofthe12

3 жыл бұрын

@@capmidnite but whatever US orders them to do they will gladly do what US told them to too. and they also won't dare to complain if they got smacked by the US like how Japan got smacked economically in the 80s-90s with protectionism accusation or how the EU's euro got smacked liek a few months after it got released therefore preventign it further high growth. so its a win win for the US, spending money to protect them but also is a good tool in negotiation and way to keep their status as the number 1 power. ancient china is also the same, they got prestige for international politics and internal stability thanks to the tributary system. Taht's why ancient chian is the center of the world, everyone wants to trade with them even fi they are on the opposite side of the world, in the industrial era UK became the central of the wrold and then new US. so whatever country you are the hegemon will always profit more than others even if others profits from the hegemon too.

@gemelek4346

3 жыл бұрын

China didn't have to. It was just about showing superiority

@Mario-kf3ej

3 жыл бұрын

@@capmidnite you somehow ... totally avoided mentioning biggest parasite - Germany. Not only they started WWII but then Europe was protecting what was left of them from communists that they had deal with prior to WWII. And to be true to thier nature Germans recently now that their best friend forever (aka Russia) is on good terms with them again - they start calling Americans serving in Germany as occupants. Which is cringe at best because once USA decided they will move thier troops to other countries like Poland and or back to Home recently - then Germans got upset at same time because they lost thier meatshield while at same time building up economical superpower through EU. Not to mention also that Germans got rebuilt not by thier own hands but foreign sponsored plans like Marshall plan and whatnot all the time when multiple victims from thier war of aggression got left behind IRON CURTAIN - Czech,Slovakia,Poland,Estonia,Lithuania,Latvia,Ukraine etc. Now today Germans who barelly have any army , but were always shielded from cruel fate by Nato claim themselves to be somehow beacon of Democracy, Liberty and good will. Sadly with enough washed money and PR you can pretend to be anything and anyone those days. Pretend you haven't ruined own continent countless times and ride on some fake morality superiority.

Thank you for helping to clarify often overlooked history

To boil it down, believing that your country is the best country in the world without adapting it to the times will lead to your country’s downfall

@bruce0750

2 жыл бұрын

USA! USA! USA!

@vstachen7761

2 жыл бұрын

Before the Western Industrial Revolution, China had a dominant position in East Asia. It was in a period of political corruption, busy with internal struggles, and was captured by the northern nomads.

Thanks for posting this video.

I think one of my favorite parts of the first opium was that the Qing feared losing power so they centralized so much that commandeered needed the emperors approval to begin a battle so when they would see British ships off the mainland instead of just firing the Chinese commanders would send a message to the emperor to ask for approval and when it would arrive back the ships were long gone. Another funny thing is that the Ming dynasty were such good architects that when a British commander boasted he would destroy the walls of a Chinese city and gave the order to fire the walls which were about 300 years old at that point barely had any damage done to them.

@luutuan7162

3 жыл бұрын

well yes, but to add it more, China politic was extremely "chaotic", in second you are a general, a hero of your country, a second later you could have your head chopped off. But why tho? because of your Rival politician, those who always surrounded the emperor, whispering lies to the him. So a smart general would always wait for command because he knew he would not be there to explain his action. Yes the moment the general met his emperor, he would be reduced to a head only.

@stevenw2933

2 жыл бұрын

What makes the wall thing crazier is a century later the Japanese tried to destroy ancient Chinese walls with modern artillery and bombers still nothing. They played pivotal roles in the defense of China in WW2. Many of those Chinese walls stand today. Its almost like China is known for building walls.

@lzh4950

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevenw2933 Think some of the ancient Chinese walls were destroyed by the Cultural Revolution instead e.g. the ones surrounding _Nanjing_ (Think only the city of _Xian_ has a fully intact ancient wall around its perimeter today)

@stevenw2933

2 жыл бұрын

@@lzh4950 Those walls were being destroyed continuously after ww2, not just due to the cultural revolution. The main reason is that it costs money to upkeep and the locals generally wanted to reuse the stones to build housing. It has very little to do with artifact destruction that happened elsewhere. The ones in the major cities were taken down intentionally to open up space for new construction. You will find better preserved walls generally in the west/south west area of China whereas in the north and east coast its almost all gone except for the gates.

@ac1455

Жыл бұрын

Well, the walls are pretty thick and packed. Nothing short of modern shells are going to pierce them. You could probably line up a couple elephants on them

The Qing dynasty wasn't weak. Not the entire dynasty anyway. It was weak by the end and that happens to literally every dynasty ever. Qing was far from being the weakest ancient Chinese dynasty. A major explanation for why it was so weak by the end was because the monarch were supercilious and xenophobic. As the world outside went through industrialisation and rapid reform the Qing emperors insisted on traditions and stability and refused to change for the better. It was too late when they realised it. Actually what I mean is... the title may be misleading.

@chisamatoi1682

2 жыл бұрын

Qing is the weakest because Qing kills its people’s free thinking. The whole country was sick and everyone was addicted with the drugs. Literally all the Chinese at that time was living in a dream

@amwill8929

2 жыл бұрын

No dynasty last for ever. In China a dynasty hardly last more than 200years. Qing was 200years old when it countered industrialized western powers. Bad luck.

@deadby15

2 жыл бұрын

Only The West had access to Scientific thinking and advanced Technologies between 17-19th century. Qing was unlucky its reign coincided with the Industrial Revolution.

@gabrielhu6596

2 жыл бұрын

@@chisamatoi1682 that was not true. Qing as extremely strong in its first half, it conquered Xingjian and Tibet, incorporated Mongolia and Manchuria, and maintained tributary relationship with many states such as Korea and Vietnam. Imperial China was the largest dynasty in its history. And the intellectual development in Qing was okay, it had one of the four classics the Dream of the Red Chamber published.

@gagamba9198

2 жыл бұрын

Good comment. About the only ones who could hold off the Qing consistently were the Burmese, who did so four times.

Good shit man, thanks for sharing.

Great video, thank you so much for sharing!

Thank you for the comprehensive summary.

Broke: China is Taiwan Woke: Taiwan is China Bespoke: Taiwan is Dutch Baroque: China is Dutch

@peanutbutterman411

3 жыл бұрын

Keep it at 69 likes

@johannsebastianbach5223

3 жыл бұрын

The best comment in human history.

@matpk

2 жыл бұрын

@@johannsebastianbach5223 Compare 1930s Nazi Germany Vs 2020s Communist Chinazi IN YOUR NEXT VIDEO Project before it's too late

To sum it up: The Qing Dynasty was weak because of hubris, corruption and inflexibility.

@GabrielLee666

2 жыл бұрын

The Qing Dynasty came from nomadic people from Mongolia and other places, they didn't think they were Chinese, they thought we were inferior, then the West attacked China, the Qing Dynasty was defeated, the Han people ruled China again, and the Qing Dynasty Manchus were worried about the Han people's retaliation, they changed their surnames, and these damn it nomads

@GabrielLee666

2 жыл бұрын

In some senses, the invasion of the West is also the liberation of the Chinese.

Smashed the sub button real hard when I saw your intro. Heck yeah

Very well researched video! Thanks for making such a great content! Keep it up!

It would be interesting to have a thorough look at how Europe reacted to the Manchu takeover of China. I came across some accounts from the 1600s in the Royal Institution's journals where Europeans treat this as the downfall of Chinese civilisation akin to the Fall of Rome and sympathise with the Han people as oppressed; I did wonder if this is related to later interactions, i.e. Europeans looking down on the Qing in the 18th century as a barbarian overclass only play-acting at running the Chinese civilisation that Europe respected.

@hititmanify

3 жыл бұрын

I doubt they truly cared who reigned on the other side of the world esp. If china didnt fall to a european neighbour so that one would gain an advantage which after trafalgar was gone for good anyway.

@ihavenojawandimustscream4681

3 жыл бұрын

If there is such sentiments i doubt it is widespread among European rulers and contemporaries. Most treaties made with Qing dynasty back then made no distinguishment between the manchu overlords and their han and other central asian subjects,instead they put it together under a westphalian-based concept of a Chinese state.

@user-pr9vi4ze4j

3 жыл бұрын

Europeans are not aware of the real situation in China. until 1793 that George Macartney led a delegation to visit the Qing Dynasty. He really understood the backwardness and weakness of the Qing Dynasty.

@jiajohn2183

3 жыл бұрын

Wow I thought no one know this c but yes , there is these kind of article. back then this kind of action even drive the Japanese imperialism. Funny things is , because many of the western publish those article about was saying how Qing empire is the sign of falling of Chinese civilizations , and they describe it as the same way as falling of Rome (these kind of articles was later been suspected as the joint movement that the western and Japan plan as an justification for their invasion to China). Then Japanese step in , and claiming they’re the true inherent of Chinese culture and start to invade China. (Yes they first invade China in the name of preserve Chinese culture 🙄). As the result, million of the Chinese are being murder and killed, and thousand of Chinese traditional book & artifacts that they first claim to be “fake” are being stolen and later been Japanese promoted it and say all these artifacts are gain from the Tang Dynasty (that’s impossible b/c of the superior status of Tang China, Japanese never have the status to own such book). 😡. And to modern day, some old Japanese or ppl who still make excuse for Japan still saying their culture is “real Chinese culture”😅they still say their invasion of China is merely the “civil war “ between Chinese civilizations, and calling them the inherent of Chinese culture, such shameful.

@jiajohn2183

3 жыл бұрын

One example would be Japanese stole literally thousand of 雅乐 (traditional Chinese) music script from China during the invasion, sadly they even killed all of the artist who practice 雅乐，and that cause these Chinese traditional music disappeared during 民国 (when China is under control of PRC, aka Taiwan that’s you guys familiar so). And today, there is a Chinese man who spend his entire life to take back all the treasure that was stolen , but Japanese keep refused to do so. Now day, Japanese is making this Chinese traditional indeed nice , but that’s b/c of the music script they stolen from China, and Japanese still mocking China for it. What’s worst is nowadays young student want to restored those old Chinese traditional, and whenever we do it, Japanese just step in and saying we’re copied their cultures 😡 (again , these script are not exchange to Japan during Tang Dynasty, b/c as a vessel state Japan don’t have the status to read such things, otherwise it would consider disloyal to the China ).

EXCELLENT VIDEO ! THANK YOU !

Nice one, I learned a lot and you seemed to cover a bunch of stuff. Thank you =)

During that time, tea was getting popular in England.The problem was that the only acceptable payment by the Chinese for their tea was silver. There were not enough amounts of silver in British treasury and ,as there was no need for western products in China , the British had to buy silver from other European countries in high prices.That's why they started importing opium in China from plantations in India to combat the trade deficit.

@mudra5114

3 жыл бұрын

The Arabs have been trading in Opium with the Chinese since the 7th century. Even before the British went to India, the earlier Mughal Government had state monopoly on opium and India exported opium to its neighbours. This was since the time of Mughal Emperor Akbar of India. The British did not control the most important opium growing region of India, Malwa in the beginning. And all the opium money went to the treasury of the British Indian Government, not the British government.

@user-fl8lq7xq3c

3 жыл бұрын

Was fixing the trade deficit actually the stated goal? Making money is enough of a goal for the East India Company, why would they care so much about the health of the overall British economy?

@QWERTY-gp8fd

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-fl8lq7xq3c well because theyre british itself.

@allentchang

2 жыл бұрын

It was more than just tea. There was also porcelain, fans, and even Western-style mechanical clocks. Mechanical clocks were produced cheaper in Guangdong than in England.

@rockydee7499

2 жыл бұрын

@@fio123 they did looted alot of treasury rooms. Ran sack most of the gold out of the countries they invaded.

Subscribed! Didn't know you had such a detailed timeline of the Qing Dynasty! Awesome!

“Our Celestial Empire possesses all things in prolific abundance and lacks no product within its borders. There is therefore no need to import the manufacturers of outside barbarians in exchange for our own produce” It sounds like what they’re trying to do with semiconductors and what’s they have already done with high speed trains. For instance, the Macartney Embassy brought clocks as a means to encourage the purchase of British manufactured goods, but Western mechanical clocks were already manufactured in the Qing Empire at a cheaper price! (Maybe blame the Jesuits for ruining the clock manufacturing supply chain security, right?)

@taiwancanhelp6582

2 жыл бұрын

The problem is Qing can't make clocks and trains. Qing looks like USA today. they are losing their manufacturing industry. regard themselves as world center isolated from the world. they boycott chinese products like Qing dose.

@allentchang

2 жыл бұрын

@@taiwancanhelp6582 Sounds like you've never visited the Guangzhou Huangpu Port to learn about the clocks manufactured in the Qing Empire. journal.hautehorlogerie.org/en/chinese-made-clocks-in-the-qing-dynasty/

@taiwancanhelp6582

2 жыл бұрын

@@allentchang It's not cheap and it's scale not that large to become a industry. just like USA can make train but can't compete with china.

@stephenjenkins7971

2 жыл бұрын

@@taiwancanhelp6582 Uh, no. The US doesn't boycott Chinese products and is very much a center of world trade. And the US, while lost much of their manufacturing industry, maintained what it had for the past decade. There is no comparison between the Qing in the US whatsoever.

@amazingpeterzhu

2 жыл бұрын

@@stephenjenkins7971 The US doesn't boycott Chinese products，Trump:trade war，Biden:continue

This was a wonderfully made high level summary of the changes in Chinese political and territorial history. Not only that it helped the understanding of the demise of an empire, it also helped us reconsider the many claims the west and the current China made against controversial territories of Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan. I speculate that even if China was ruled by a democratic system today, she would still not have been willing to relinquish the claims to those territories over the many benefits in national defence and natural resource terms.

Are parts 2 and 3 uploaded? You made a very informative video here, I would love to hear more about Chinese history from you

Victoria II: -Start as any nation -Declare war on Qing -Capture Caozhou -Conquer the world

The late Qing Dynasty was already having the symptoms of a failing empire before the Opium War. Economic crisis, income inequality, ethnic tensions, religious wackos, widespread corruption and protectionism. Which led to the Opium War and foreign invasions. Reform and modernization are still the top priorities in modern China.

@cooldudecs

Жыл бұрын

It’s just a way funnel money to political leaders

@johnjohnson9651

11 ай бұрын

Sounds kinda like the usa

This was amazing 🔥

海納百川，有容乃大。壁立千仞，無欲則剛。 "The sea accepts the waters of a hundred rivers; its tolerance results in its grandeur" - Poem by Lin Zexu (Anti British Chinese freedom fighter)

@Stevey-of3zd

3 жыл бұрын

Calling Lin Zexu an anti-British Chinese freedom fighter is a stretch when he was blamed and exiled by the Chinese to Xinjiang for losing a war that was impossible to win. He was one of the only Qing officials that took the British army seriously and realized how powerful they were. He was open to Western technology and innovation to improve China but the government betrayed him. Being pro-China doesn't mean being anti-West and being pro-West doesn't mean being anti-China.

@moritamikamikara3879

3 жыл бұрын

He was a bureaucrat. No more, no less.

@user-gs5np7tv3c

3 жыл бұрын

No, he is not. he knew exactly how big the gap of military power is and he still blame others for efforts of peace talk. He is kind of 清流 at the end of Ming dynasty, a group of people use ideology to cover their interests. Lin admited the war could not be won later, yet he blame a bureau who suggest peace to the ruler. he did this for his fame.

@anthonyc7279

3 жыл бұрын

He is also anti-drugs; he fought against Britain in the Opium war.

@QWERTY-gp8fd

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-gs5np7tv3c what does 清流 mean?

Very good video,thank you for your efforts. I can appreciate the fact that this must take infinitely more time than a 3 min video. Let's hope it notifies people about your channel.

You are pretty thorough, well done

I think most people in China at the time didn’t care that the British were attacking the Qing. They were not happy with the Qing anyways

the early qing dynasty was actually very powerful, but today few remember their former success but rather the last 100 years

@tengteng4076

3 жыл бұрын

it was weakened by europeans and japan...china should be thankful, it ended the 300 years of slavery by Qing of the manchu to china

@HistoricalWeapons

3 жыл бұрын

@@tengteng4076 thats a very han focused view. the manchus/jurchens would disagree with you

@tengteng4076

3 жыл бұрын

@@HistoricalWeapons false narratives indeed served china well...china assuming the identity of their former slave masters the Qing to grab territories of other nations...china claiming the conquest and legacies of their former colonizer...

@dvf1736

3 жыл бұрын

@@tengteng4076 except China isn't just the Han. That's like saying a country is only what the majority population are. Were the British enslaved when their royal family were French and German rather than Anglo? Manchus, like the Hui, Miao, Zhuang, Yi, etc are all Chinese, regardless of how much of the population they make up. Plus, Manchu culture has reshaped China's culture, and many things that people attribute to China or even the Han originally came from the Manchus

@tengteng4076

3 жыл бұрын

@@dvf1736 wow...trying hard just to make ends meet...russians, uzbekistan and korea are part of your ethnicities....are they chinese?

i love your voice and your style, this is the best

@christianriddler5063

3 жыл бұрын

@Soldat Kaiyodo No, it's corrupt and full of bribed officials and weak military, should be abolished.

Excellent synopsis of the complex factors that shaped China’s relations with an ever encroaching world and its “century of humiliation”. Essential prerequisite for understanding its present mindset and role on the international stage.

@BoopSnoot

2 жыл бұрын

Its a bit unfair though to paint the Chinese as so weak, instead of the Europeans as so strong. Whites conquered the entire planet, not just China. Africa, North America, South America, Australia, SE.Asia, there was no empire in the world that could withstand white dominance.

@user-wp5wo7qq6r

Жыл бұрын

“century of humiliation” is masochism and paranoia of persecution history view，Chinese never know what humiliation and dignity are for thousand years till now

@davidlang1125

Жыл бұрын

@@user-wp5wo7qq6r can you elaborate your comment further?

@user-wp5wo7qq6r

Жыл бұрын

@@davidlang1125 中国在国际舞台上没有任何心态，一切国际行动和外交政策，都是皇上的个人意志罢了。中国不是一个文化共同体，是个古代奴隶制皇权政体。皇上照样残忍贪婪，底层的奴隶照样活得像动物

Wonderfully explained💜💙

really enjoyed this new format, well done!

@user-sl2eu8ho9y

3 жыл бұрын

Are you ready to draw a new China ball?It's lovely. I love it

@PoliticswithPaint

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-sl2eu8ho9y Thank you! A new video is in the works.

This video is fantastic I like this very much Your videos are good and according to my account your channel is best of the KZread and also I acquired knowledge from this so I liked this very much carry on you will must become the best KZread channel in future

Really well made

In fact, the biggest regret of the Battle of Tumubao is not that the Ming Dynasty lost its elite troops, but that this incident changed its political ecology. Since then, the Ming Dynasty has changed from an export-oriented country to a conservative country.

The North Star can be seen at the zenith everywhere kn the northern hemisphere at midnight right?

@fynflorentine2512

3 жыл бұрын

Yup

@APersonOnYouTubeX

3 жыл бұрын

North Star points to North right? Or can I be seen only from North? I am not an astronomer or smart

@tfortea5379

3 жыл бұрын

@@APersonOnKZreadX something like that, people use it to indicate the north

@eybaza6018

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah

@goosenuggets9693

3 жыл бұрын

@@APersonOnKZreadX The North star always sits above the northern axis of the Earths spin, the other stars move in the opposite direction of the spin around the Northern star.

Great video. Understanding the decline of the Qing Empire is key to understanding Chinas actions today

@randomrazr

3 жыл бұрын

like how u basically get the death panetaly for smuggling durgs into china.

@notme5834

2 жыл бұрын

Terrible video, riddled with blatant inaccuracies

great video

This is a fantastic video on Chinese geophysical and ethnic history.. I have always found Chinese history very difficult to follow..and this video makes it easier

10/10 video, and everyone's weirdly disgruntled expressions somehow makes it so much better than I thought it would. Thanks!

9:53 both Hakka and Cantonese were Han Chinese. The Hakka were originally from the North who migrated southwards due to wars, famine, etc

@kevinaa114

2 жыл бұрын

yes

@sitanhuang9402

2 жыл бұрын

I'm Hakka, we're more Han than northerners. My great grandparents always had this belief that northerners bred with barbarian blood.

@chinesere-educationcampsfo6983

2 жыл бұрын

@@sitanhuang9402 That is bull..... It's the southerners

@piyushjaiswal9283

Жыл бұрын

@@sitanhuang9402 and what's so special about your blood? Han emperors couldn't defeat any of the so called barbarians without a partner from those barbarians themselves. Especially the Turks participated in so many wars of Chinese Hans against others

amazing video

Great Videos, thanks. What books and resources did you use for your research? Sources would be very helpful. Thank you.

The concept of the century of humiliation has always been more about self-reflection than fearing foreign powers

@franciscoflamenco

3 жыл бұрын

Traditionally, maybe, but nowadays it very much just means "han good, foreign barbarians bad, never let the barbarians win again"

@user-ur4dv3ts3f

3 жыл бұрын

@@franciscoflamenco There are ignorant people everywhere. And it is an useful practise to rally your people under the banner of nationalism in time of crisis.

@Strideo1

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-ur4dv3ts3f Nationalism is usually just an irrational knee-jerk reaction to problems where a country lashes out at foreign entities and blames them for its problems. China was more liberal and free before Xi Jinping came to power and was better for it.

@KHANSTER1029

3 жыл бұрын

@@Strideo1 I agree with your first statement but not really with the 2nd. I've lived in China previously and also recently. Bribing and corruption was quite common in the early 2000s. For all of Xi's faults, his anti-corruption scheme was the one aspect that I think was wildly successful in my experience

@bingqizhou6339

3 жыл бұрын

@@KHANSTER1029 People who've actually come to China always make the best assessment. Bright guy.

"And so too the vietnamese followed sinocentrism as well" *highlight the philippines* 🤦🤦

@rush6837

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah lmao this channel doesn't know any shit about what he's talking about

@christianriddler5063

3 жыл бұрын

The Philippines did it too though.

@christianjocson5509

3 жыл бұрын

@@christianriddler5063 Not really. Colonial Philippines was more hispanic than it was Chinese.

@darkdork78

3 жыл бұрын

@@christianjocson5509 the Chinese tributary system did include the Philippines before the arrival of Spain

@hanzhang693

3 жыл бұрын

This channel have many other mistaken infos and that poor guy probably doesn't know it :( In this Video i notice several mistakes.... he could have done some real research to what he was talking about, maybe he just jumped to conclusion too fast

hi thanks for the making such videos of history. From this video I just learned that Nepal tried control Tibet which i have never heard before. if you could make a detail video that would be highly appreciate...

@user-kc4qr8qz6s

Жыл бұрын

interesting

Hi ! thank you for the video ! about the moment 7:30 I'd just like to point out that the 8 banners were never all under the control of the Emperor, he originially controlleld 1 and ended up controlling 3, which made up the 3 upper banners.

Thank you for this. I had Chinese History back when I was in school, but a lot of the details were omitted. For instance, I never knew trouble was brewing in Tibet, that contributed to the signing of the Treaty of Nanking.

@notme5834

2 жыл бұрын

This guy omitted a lot of details too. His take and video isnt accurate and you shouldnt trust it. For example, the Chinese did way more in the Imjin War.

@Xanthopathy

Жыл бұрын

@@notme5834 shill

@notme5834

Жыл бұрын

@@Xanthopathy shill? go learn actual history instead of some regurgitated soundbyte from some neckbeard loner weeb

@ThatPianoNoob

9 ай бұрын

​@@notme5834absolutely. Coincidentally how do you feel about the CCP?

Your channel is so good!

Very good thanks!

While the Korean navy played an important role in defeating the Japanese, the Ming also sent troops to assist Korea as well.

@gungdegalang4635

2 жыл бұрын

When korea joseon under Qing protectorate ,the Japanese didnt dare to invade korea at least until the Qing was lost to the british

@applejuice7847

2 жыл бұрын

@@gungdegalang4635 the japanese tried to conquer korea so they would have a launching point for an invasion of china so them being scared of china is very unlikey

@user-gl7ds9xw3p

2 жыл бұрын

@@gungdegalang4635 Poor Korea, between two big powers, just like Poland.

@user-gl7ds9xw3p

2 жыл бұрын

That's true. The army of Ming is the main force to defeat Japanese, just like the PLA played a major role in the Korean War. 400 years ago, Korea treated Ming Dynasty as father and built monument in memory of the army of Ming Dynasty, but nowadays, Koreans belittled or even ignored the contribution and sacrifice of Ming Dynasty, which brings shame to their ancestors.

@tigeriontigerion9112

2 жыл бұрын

That is a lie faked up by Korean. In reality, Korean was just beated over and over but Ming saved them.

3:40 So Spain taking over Guangxi in one of my EU4 game is actually something they planned IRL

Its amasing how chinese and russians became naibors...both where expanding on simular time toward each other...russians where allready in sibiria bevore manchu became emperors of china

@samiamrg7

3 жыл бұрын

Good thing the Manchus went south when they did or else they may have ended up speaking Russian instead of living it up as nobility in China, lol.

@milanvitu3963

3 жыл бұрын

@@samiamrg7 today manchus are a lost minority between 100 million han chinese settler in manchuria...in the russian far east are only 8 million russians...indinous groups like the sakha people got own province republic...its not too bad

@QWERTY-gp8fd

3 жыл бұрын

@@milanvitu3963 so how many of them are actually speak sakhan and identify itself as different people?

Excellent account 👍

Just read the comments below. Even today, so many westerners still are proud of their colonial history, never apologize to the invaded countries. Is it common that you think it is your right to invade the weak countries when you are strong? I think that is the root reason why they are afraid of a strong China. They believe China will invade them back when China recovers from the weakness, just like what they did in history.

@moedictatornoriega8475

Жыл бұрын

true true but youll never know that even china will do worse lol

@tahmkench118

Жыл бұрын

Why should we feel sorry for being winners lmfao

@stephenjenkins7971

Жыл бұрын

China's history is that of being ruthless imperialists to begin with. Thousands of years of history of crushing it's neighbors. Compared to that, the West are babies.

@male19-ye9fg

23 күн бұрын

​@@tahmkench118Without the series of coincidences surrounding the demise of the Ming Dynasty, it would have been impossible for the world to have been dominated by the West in recent centuries.

I like the new format. Audiences can handle depth. Have you thought about doing stuff in the 8-12 minute range? That's my sweet spot. I often look at a 30 minute video and go 'I don't have time'. EDIT: I see you've recently been releasing stuff in that range! Nice stuff. The 3 minute histories were always a bit too brief for me - I'll check out your longer stuff.

@JabzyJoe

3 жыл бұрын

I'm still trying to find the balance to be honest. 3MH were never recommended to people in the end. This is the 1st 30 min video I've done in ages and it's really kicking off as audience retention is high compared to previous vids. But, if it happens everytime is a mystery. It's always a gamble when you double (or triple) the work but get the same back. Some people have cracked the KZread code, but I have not.

@ahorrell

3 жыл бұрын

@@JabzyJoe Yeah this video autoplayed for me. Normally I wouldn't even start a 30 minute video, but this one started and I really enjoyed it. So congrats! The content was good enough that a 30-minute-skeptic watched all the way though

@lrakerif4069

2 жыл бұрын

Then take your bloody time... Concentration rates are already going down thx to tik tok and other sm pages... Let at least documentarys be a little longer!

One has to be ridiculously Eurocentric to blame the end of the Qing Dynasty on the Opium Wars, a million and one stabs ended the Empire, in fact many other wars during this same period were more impactful.

@kye4216

3 жыл бұрын

Yes it’s like how everyone thinks the bombs caused Japan to surrender but in reality it was Russia declaring war on them

@goosenuggets9693

3 жыл бұрын

@@kye4216 That's an ironic analogy, it's not only wrong, but it's wrong for the exact reason you are making an analogy in the first place. The Japanese didn't surrender just because of the Soviets, they surrendered because of the compound of: an imminent US invasion, the Atomic capabilities of the US, & the Soviets joining the war.

@kye4216

3 жыл бұрын

@@goosenuggets9693 well maybe you can argue the bombs added pressure but the Japanese intended to keep fighting the Americans and their plan revolved around gaining an alliance with the Russians. i think its telling which had more of an impact when after the first atomic bomb was doped one of the members of the supreme war council proposed a meeting to discuss it and none of the others thought it was worth it. the Russians declared war and that council were in a meeting within hours

@mudra5114

3 жыл бұрын

@@kye4216The USA did the hard work in fighting Japan, the Soviets pounced on a weakened Japanese Empire and took Korea and Manchuria. Created a needless division in Korea, which still plaques that nation.

@kye4216

3 жыл бұрын

@@mudra5114 it doesn’t matter which side fought the Japanese more the thing that forced them to surrender was the Russians declaring war not the bombs, people claim it was the bombs to justify all the civilians it killed

this was SOOOO GOOD

on my recommended, very interesting.

very interesting to watch history retold. Just one thing i picked up, the revolt of the three feudatories happened during Kang Xi's reign 1670s to 1680s. 1661 was when emperor Kang Xi took over from emperor Shun Zi and also when the Ming Loyalist of the Zheng Family drove the dutch out of Famosa/Taiwan

13:43 emperor seems like an interesting guy 🙃

@AZ-ee8vq

3 жыл бұрын

the earliest cosplay

Meteor actually gives you buff in Stellaris. But shoots your stability in EU4.

The disasters of 1848 aren't mentioned here. The map shows the Yellow river flowing out north of Shandong, but before 1848 it flowed out near Shanghai. The shift of the river banks caused catastrophic flooding all across Northern china.

No wonder the Traditional Korean attire reminds me of a mix between Japanese and Ming dynasty fashion infused. Amazing

@jtsy7499

3 жыл бұрын

Lol Koreans are nor Japanese or Chinese. Different genetics and lineage. And Japanese are mixed people.

@lkcdarzadix6216

3 жыл бұрын

@@jtsy7499 what meant he found the korean attire of mix culture of ming and Japaneses he did not mention genetics

@jtsy7499

3 жыл бұрын

@@lkcdarzadix6216 Korea have own cultures too. Koreans just had to deal with both Chinese and Japanese pirates during the joseon. and Japanese can’t just stay in their own island.

@lkcdarzadix6216

3 жыл бұрын

@@jtsy7499 hence the cultural mix of some aspect heck japanese culture were influence by Chinese later by western

@genghiskhan6809

3 жыл бұрын

@@jtsy7499 They don’t stay on their collection of god forsaken islands because they’re exactly that: GOD FORSAKEN ISLANDS. This is bound to happen to any people who live on islands. Resources VERY quickly become strained and as such, one of 2 solutions has to be implemented: conquest or diaspora. This very fate happened also to the British who were conquerors and is happening now to the Filipinos who are creating a massive, global diaspora.

Hong Xiquan was never a convert as he was never a Christian, but a rather a charlatan pushing his own religion

@charlesmadre5568

3 жыл бұрын

He was about as Christian as Scientology, which also claims to be Christian

@jonathanwilliams1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@charlesmadre5568 in other words not at all

@user-pu4lv6pr5v

3 жыл бұрын

He was Christian, saying otherwise is redundant, he read the Bible and believed one is redeemed through faith in Christ. At worse he is not Christian in that he does not follow Tradition i.e Catholic or Orthodox, but as far as the Sola Scriptura and Solia Fide is concern, he is definitely Christian.

@jonathanwilliams1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-pu4lv6pr5v he literally called himself Jesus brother No sola scriptura there Quite the opposite He worshiped himself and got others to worship him too and not Christ

@user-pu4lv6pr5v

3 жыл бұрын

@@jonathanwilliams1065 That is not unchristian, it is the opposite. It is one of the basic tenets of Christianity, that we are adopted sons of God through Jesus Christ. Matt 12:50 For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister

First thing, great video. Second thing, what is the music in the background?

29:00 The British Navy and Marines were equipped with rifled steel guns that had a greater range than the Chinese iron muskets so British forces could fire at Chinese soldiers without putting themselves at risk of getting hit ...Similarly Chinese Forts and junks used non rifled bronze or iron cannon with less accuracy and lower range than the British rifled steel cannons ...so British warships could bombard Chinese fortification without being at risk of getting hit. The Qin Dynasty Banner system was designed to prevent internal rebellion but was not designed to fight a foreign power Banner Commanders lack the military discipline and skill to fight the modern international military forces of the time. The Imperial Chinese Army was poorly equipped and poorly trained by Western military standards of the day. The concept of creating a corp of professional military officers was a novel idea in the1800-`1900 ...The Chinese Empire more concerned about internal rebellion than foreign invasions from 1700 to 1870...China's ruling elite's tendency to oppress ethnic regional minorities and the lack of a power checking system to control corruption made ruling China alway cam with having to deal with suppressing multiple rebellions ... had the Chinese Empire had a more hands off approach with guaranteed civil rights and a stronger anti corrruption check system ... the Empire would not need to focust on stamping out internal rebellions

Not to mention the drug addiction in the Qing dynasty military

You just won a subscriber.

What is the music in the background...??? It's hypnotic!

From the title, a lot of professional army officers were asking the same question. And not just for the Qin Army but other armies that they have fought against such as in India, in which their soldiers and warriors fought with fanaticism and their cannoneers defended their cannons to the last.

@gamechanger8908

2 жыл бұрын

Qing* not being a grammar Nazi but there's also a Chinese dynasty called Qin

@ashutoshsharma7923

2 жыл бұрын

Qing never had any war with india

@thememe1473

Жыл бұрын

​​@@ashutoshsharma7923 didn't the sikh empire fought china ?? Even though the indians in 17th and 18th century were fighting against afghans more prominantly