Start your FREE Exposure Risk Scan Covering 270+ Data Brokers: app.optery.com/signup?

@Ash888Mohd

Ай бұрын

Can you make a video about the XQ-58A please 🙏

@God-ch8lq

Ай бұрын

the J-10 was a stolen IAI lavi they somehow got the blueprints a while after the lavi was discontinued so them copying stuff from the F-22 is rather likely

@Sajuuk

Ай бұрын

Your video misses critical information regarding the modernization of the F22. Current upgrades already installed were designed to enable the F-22 to ID targets at longer ranges, respond more efficiently to sensor input, sustain an air-to-air combat superiority over near-peer rivals and lay down a technical foundation such that the aircraft can quickly embrace new weapons, technologies, sensors and software as they emerge. The specific weapons improvements for the F-22s to massively expand its target envelope, air-to-air attack range and lock-on-launch precision. The upgraded F-22s are now able to track and destroy enemy targets flying behind them, hit air targets with much greater force, precision and destructive power and include new GPS jam-resistant technologies. The US Airforce has recently designated the F22 as their highest priority, and are set on upgrading it to last past the 2040s and into the 2060s, a change from their earlier plans to retire them. This is in response to the appearance of competing foreign 5th gen fighters and the time still needed to develop and build their fleet of NGADs for the Navy and Airforce. Lockheed is also adding hardware-external low drag tanks and pylons-to the jet so it can hold more gas when it’s refueled, giving it more range and the ability to go farther or stay on station longer. Technology developed from the NGAD programme is also to be incorporated into the F22's formally slated for retirement by the 2030s, essentially upgrading the aircraft to Gen5++ The F22 will remain in service past the 2040s, possibly until 2060, and will remain the world's premier warplane until 6th Gen aircraft make their appearance.

@skaldlouiscyphre2453

Ай бұрын

@@God-ch8lq You're aware the J-10 uses a long-coupled canard design like the Eurofighter, rather than a close-coupled canard design like the Lavi, right?

@thanosfickda

29 күн бұрын

ok, you said why the west should fear the J20, i don't see any good reasons , the f35 is way more stealthy than J20 according to this video and U.S have thousand of F35 , U.S is already like so many miles ahead when compared to China military

When talking about production numbers compared to the f22, the j20 has more, but you also must point out that the f35, which the US is dumping far more resources into, has well over 1000 units made, quintupling the j20.

@PolymurExcel

Ай бұрын

Never mind that NGAD and NGNF are basically right around the corner.

@T-Dawg123a

Ай бұрын

Both the Raptor and F-35 are continually improving. The Raptor is set to receive low observable drop tanks that will boost its range considerably and not leave a bunch of pylon on the jet if dropped. Also, the F-22 is getting what are thought to be IRST pods as well. The F-35 is getting some new upgrades in the upcoming production batches, as well as the planned block 4 upgrades coming soon.

@Userext47

29 күн бұрын

F-35 is not an air superiority fighter. It's a multi-role jet and while at BVR manuverability doesn't matter much, when both of you have enough stealth to only see eachother out the window then it matters. Also china is developing J-35 or FC-31 that is an F-35 clone. It's a numbers game when stealth is equivalent and china has the production advantage

@fZionists78

29 күн бұрын

You must, or at least should, begin to understand everything you desperately(or is it intentionally?) fail to. The F-35 is a useless POS. A useless money pit used to enrich politicians and the MIC. Meanwhile ALL fighters are useless because Russia and the nations they’ve sold to, possess hypersonics. Hypersonic missiles make ships irrelevant. Runways irrelevant. And you can be sure, the hangers storing the useless money pit F-35s irrelevant.

@CalvinHsuChen

29 күн бұрын

@@Userext47 Reminder F35 is far ahead of Junk-35 because F35 is getting constant upgrade. Junk 35 is still in the womb while F35 is basically matured.

The J-20 is an interceptor, not a fighter. It's designed to cover the long distances of the South China Sea with speed, launch big telephone-pole sized long-range air-to-air or air-to-surface missiles at strategic targets like AWACS, tankers, ships, and land bases, then return to base and reload. It's not a dogfighter. The PLA's doctrine is to overwhelm enemies with quantity, in this case quantity of missiles - land-launched, sea-launched, and air-launched simultaneously. Blanket the entire SCS in missile barrages. And they're producing both those missiles, and their launch platforms (J-20, Type-055, subs, land launchers, etc) in quantity. That's the real problem they're creating for US and allied forces in the region, quantity + range, not any one particular platform.

@nicholasespinoza9610

29 күн бұрын

the one big advange the J-20 has that most channels don't mention is range.

@kevinc1200

29 күн бұрын

1. Interceptor not a fighter: often parroted but nothing from Chinese source indicate this. Its much more likely that it is meant to do both, and the canards help significantly with maneuverability. No guns but it has short ranged IR missiles for dogfights, which is the primary modern weapon for dogfights. Btw only F35A airforce variant comes with internal guns. 2. Overwhelm enemies with quantity : again a Western projection, just like how the Chinese were portrayed using human wave attacks in the Korean war or Russians in the Ukraine war. Of course more stuff is better but it is not much of a doctrine. The Chinese doctrine is symmetrical with US doctrine and emphasizes networking and system of systems. If you are talking about saturation attack then it is not really about quantity but rather coordination of assets which does go back to the system of systems idea.

@dylanshobbies8794

28 күн бұрын

Damm good thing the us still has a baller ass fleet of f15s which are still the fastest interceptors in existence

@Wishalloy

28 күн бұрын

Giving up the gun in a plane has already been a bad decision in military history.

@jacobbaumgardner3406

28 күн бұрын

It depends. An interceptor isn’t good at BVR (engaging, defending, recommitting), but a fighter is. The J-20 as far as we can tell has good kinematic performance at high Mach.

the j-20 looks like an illegitimate son of the stealth fighter family

@subasthapa4839

Ай бұрын

Nice cope

@user-ht8dd8kc3x

Ай бұрын

J-20 LIKE DRAGON FLY

@Jesplux

Ай бұрын

That’s what happens when you build vehicles using stolen tech

@sirfer6969

Ай бұрын

It's the 6-fingered, cross-eyed child of inbred twins...canards on stealth design...smh

@silveriver9

Ай бұрын

We all know what happened to Goliath and the Hare.

The F-22 was actually just updated to have an IRST pod and stealthy external pylons

@dontaskme76

28 күн бұрын

Yeah just over a week ago, it supposedly got new stealthy external fuel tanks and IRST pods which can be mounted on the wings or under it

@FranckLarsen

28 күн бұрын

That's good to hear.

@HairLessBush

24 күн бұрын

​@@dontaskme76which makes the stealth on those planes worse.

@fightfish3265

22 күн бұрын

​@HairLessBush Lol, are you sure about that? These tanks and pods are brand new designs, and quite stealthy. Not like.... canards.

@dontaskme76

22 күн бұрын

@@HairLessBush they're literally designed with stealth in mind bro don't think you're smarter than the engineers at Lockheed martin

Correction. The F-22 was designed in the 1980s.

@silveriver9

Ай бұрын

Obsolete design.

@Schnittertm1

Ай бұрын

@@silveriver9 I see, so that is why still everyone is trying to copy the F-22.

@pomelo9840

Ай бұрын

@@silveriver9 OR a design the opponents have yet to match, which seems to be more likely the case since the russian and chinese stealth fighters are actually detectable by most radar without picking up any clutter. Stealth is the invention of the crackheads over at skunk works and they are doing quite well with being the only ones truly capable of it

@silveriver9

Ай бұрын

@@Schnittertm1 Aug 30th fleeing Afgnstn in the middle of the night with tail between legs 😂😂😂

@johnb3587

Ай бұрын

@@silveriver9what that gotta do with the f22 though?

The F-22 is undergoing a *_massive_* upgrade. You should make a video about it.

@silveriver9

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@antoniohagopian213

Ай бұрын

Yeah, by getting retired after doing absolutely nothing.

@dextermorgan1

Ай бұрын

Be glad they did absolutely nothing. Moron. ​@@antoniohagopian213

@nolimo2593

Ай бұрын

​@@antoniohagopian213You want them to use them?

@Zoalarity4326

Ай бұрын

they did show a picture of the f22 with stealth pylons

The Mighty Dragon is an interceptor and that’s it. It’s made to do long range interception/interdiction of our tankers and AWAC force multipliers. It will use its stealth to get deeper into the airspace and then fire long range AA missiles to pick off those assets from a safe distance. They have no intention of it dogfighting at all.

the f22 they had at home lmao

@LastGoatKnight

Ай бұрын

But reshaped to resemble a Gripen/ Typhoon😂

@gazzman6547

29 күн бұрын

F35>F22>F15Ex>J20

@-Timberiguess-

29 күн бұрын

cropduster>j20@@gazzman6547

@TellenJones

29 күн бұрын

The most important aspect of modern fighters is situation awareness, and that's where F22 falls behind both F35 and J20 (or any future stealth fighters) as F22's avionics are outdated. And it's hard for F22 to improve as it didn't leave much room for upgrade due to its original tight design. So J20s don't care about F22 great maneuverability if their avionics could detect F22s earlier and thus attack F22s from a long distance and b4 the latter's “great maneuverability” (if it's a lot greater than J20s' to begin with) becomes relevant.

@-Timberiguess-

29 күн бұрын

oh did my credit score go down sorry oh great winnie the poo@@TellenJones

The F-22 is getting a 16-billion-dollar upgrade according to Sandboxx.

@henrymckay9205

28 күн бұрын

I love sandboxx

@ryanreedgibson

27 күн бұрын

@@henrymckay9205 me, too, dude.

@dawn_alex

15 күн бұрын

In US, 16 billion dollar can get u a spanner. 😂

@shikharashish7616

9 күн бұрын

what are the upgrades?

@Apathy474

7 күн бұрын

@@shikharashish7616 Stealth fuel tanks and some IR pods or something, i don't remember everything but it was a decent upgrade

No gun is giving me f4 phantom vibes

@nicholassmith7984

28 күн бұрын

The F-35 B and C variants also have no gun as standard, though I think the B can be fitted with one in a pod under the fuselage as the mission requires.

@Wishalloy

28 күн бұрын

Had the same. They also thought back then they won't need it anymore. Suprise, they did.

@Hypernefelos

28 күн бұрын

The MiG-25 and MiG-31 don't have guns either. Interceptors don't need one because they wouldn't be able to make much use of one anyway.

@philipthecow

27 күн бұрын

I believe highly restrictive rules of engagement is the primary reason the F4 Phantom got into dogfights. If there's an air war near China they're most certainly not going to be fighting with such rules of engagement.

@seanplace8192

27 күн бұрын

Missile technology has evolved greatly since the Vietnam war. We won't know for sure, but the smaller aerial engagements we've seen since then indicate that guns likely will not be very useful.

A big heat signiture will not be picked up by radar. However, it will be picked up with any IR or thermal systems, like IRST.

@autoroller3391

17 күн бұрын

It's because the unburnt fuel as well as the flames from the afterburner show up on radar

Minute 4: "the heat signature of the afterburner would be visible on radar". Are you sure???

@antoniohagopian213

Ай бұрын

Peak propaganda

@piscessoedroen

29 күн бұрын

the concern that having to rely on afterburner for high speed is true, they can easily be spotted with mk1 eyeball and show up on IRST. but i guess the writer fumbled and thought radar would also apply

@antoniohagopian213

29 күн бұрын

@@piscessoedroen kid there's no long range fox 2 in yankee arsenal. So even if you somehow manage to see with a irst that far you can't do anything about it😂

@piscessoedroen

29 күн бұрын

@@antoniohagopian213 you can still lock it optically and guide a missile to it

@antoniohagopian213

28 күн бұрын

@@piscessoedroen guide what? I already said there is no long range fox2. Fox 3 still requires a radar lock otherwise it's not going to track anything but will go off the rail anyway.

You lost me at "the heat signature of the afterburner would be visable on radars."

@NeostormXLMAX

26 күн бұрын

Its a propaganda channel

@VainerCactus0

26 күн бұрын

Should have said sensors.

@user-bi7xd8ry5p

25 күн бұрын

​@@NeostormXLMAX Psst. Tiananmen Square massacre 4 June 1989

@amudeas

22 күн бұрын

​@@NeostormXLMAX lao gan ma 🗣️🔥🔥🔥

@jenniferpatrow712

21 күн бұрын

@@NeostormXLMAXif you think that watch his other vids

Why does the entire video ignore F-35? I get it's for the sake of argument and a more relative comparison, but the major reason why US has soo little F-22 cause it was a mostly prototype plane that didn't needed to be produced in such vast quantities back then. Now US has built over 1000 F-35 which are way more suitable for mass production and is a straight upgrade to F-22.

@luckycorn8590

Ай бұрын

Oh dear god thank you, finally someone actually understands that in a real conflict, the f35 is insanely more useful than the f22

@mugbeer9440

Ай бұрын

@@luckycorn8590 I love the f22 but the 35 is soooo much better

@elmohead

Ай бұрын

Because you should compare F35 to J35 instead.

@mugbeer9440

Ай бұрын

@@elmohead bot

@JarrodFrates

Ай бұрын

The F-22 was not just a prototype. It was planned to replace the F-15 in the air superiority role. Then the Soviet Union collapsed and nothing took its place, so the orders were cut way back.

Last time i checked no 5th gen aircraft has a battle record worth mentioning

@mill2712

Ай бұрын

Air-to-Air anyway. I believe the 22 and 35 have a ton of Air-to-Ground kills.

@mrunknownog9616

Ай бұрын

F35 has such, in Israel

@rajaydon1893

Ай бұрын

@@mrunknownog9616 is that a joke 😆

@johnnyboi1722

Ай бұрын

@@rajaydon1893they’ve shot down close to about a dozen drones and missiles so far.

@fZionists78

29 күн бұрын

@@mrunknownog9616targeting babies

Made by Temu lol. Now we know what data it actually collects. American stealth aircraft documents.

@silveriver9

Ай бұрын

Temu is an online platform, not a manufacturer of any products. Not very bright are you? 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@joedufour8188

Ай бұрын

@@silveriver9 Swing and a miss.

@Ilovedogs329

Ай бұрын

@@joedufour8188That guy talking about Temu is probably a Chinese bot lol

@silveriver9

Ай бұрын

@@joedufour8188 The world saw who fled Afgnstn in the middle of the night with their tail between their legs. 3 strikes you're out! 😂😂😂

@Clingerman93

Ай бұрын

That was over your head, just like the F22 is over the J20😂​@@silveriver9

Did I hear this man say that the heat signature of the j 20’s engines would be picked up on radar??? 💀💀💀

@DavidCooper-vh4nr

27 күн бұрын

Yep. Makes a strong case for fact-checking. IR sensor technology is what he meant.

@F3CKTHEZIOS

25 күн бұрын

typical american propaganda channel be like

It looks like a re engineered F-22

@ericheick7044

Ай бұрын

Or like someone described an F22 over the phone

@2goober4u

Ай бұрын

It literally is

@animepussy8356

Ай бұрын

-10000 social credit !

@drytishuuz

Ай бұрын

i fucking love how it looks

@Foxtrotbacon

Ай бұрын

It does look cool

I find it amusing that it took over 40 years for a aircraft to be designed and built that could compete with the F-22. NGAD is going to be wicked scary when it makes its appearance.....

@vladdracul2379

5 күн бұрын

Not even compete. The public knowledge of the Raptor's radar signature is over 5x more stealthy nearly 30 years before the Chinese chitter.... It's not even a competition.

@olli1407

9 сағат бұрын

Nobody on this channel knows the actual capabilities

Appreciate what you do , love the channel!!!!!

"mom i want a stealth airplane" Mom: we have that at home (j20)

I guess the thing about how all the 5th gen now looks the same it's prolly cus how optimal the F-22 was designed to this day even after everyone else testing their own design it still can't beat the F-22 foundation look, so everyone decided to copy that but alter it slightly

@5133937

Ай бұрын

Exactly. It's similar to how all SUVs look mostly the same, the design is converging on an optimal aerodynamic shape they all share.

@pieterveenders9793

Ай бұрын

Wrong. All US stealth planes are based on a Russian research paper by Piotr Ufimtsev, who was the pioneer on stealth. He was the one who found a mathematical formula with which the radar cross section of an aircraft could be calculated, and according to which the most ideal shape to reflect the highest amount of radar away from the source is a diamond shape. It's for this reason that all stealth airplanes look alike; they're all designed based on the same mathematical formula, and with the ideal stealth airplane shape already having been determined (the aforementioned diamond), it leaves no room for variation, if you want an airplane with a very low radar cross section yet still very aerodynamic then you're always going to end up with a F-22 like design. The US just happened to be the first ones to use Ufimtsev's formula to actually build an airplane with. Not the F-22, but the F-117, which due to the lack of computing power back in the day had such a strange look to it. It's the diamond shape with a V-tail added to it, and it's wings swept back, but other than that a very close resemblance to the diamond shape. The F-22 is an even better aproximation, even it's wings are diamond shaped, and thanks to more modern computing power they were able to compute a more aerodynamic blend while still retaining low RCS.

@Mgl1206

Ай бұрын

@@pieterveenders9793that was a mathematical formula and not a plane design and was only really directly relevant to the F-117.

@sipfixx

Ай бұрын

This is complete rubbish, three companies in the US have developed stealth aircraft and none of the other designs look like this. The only planes that look like Lockheed Martin designs are the ones that are copying Lockheed Martin designs. The NGAD will look nothing like the F22 because the F22 is not the ultimate design for a fighter.

@definitelyfrank9341

Ай бұрын

Actually, it's because we all follow the same laws of physics.

Why are you comparing this to the F-22 without mentioning the upgrade package for the F-22 that's has been happening since 2020 and let alone the F-35 which could easily wipe out the J-20.

@Doge_Spartan

Ай бұрын

Oh the F-22 that is retiring by 2030? Yeah guess they are having a massive upgrade by removing it lmao

@Animeaniac215

29 күн бұрын

@@Doge_Spartan Lmao they aren't retiring it by 2030. Just google it, takes you 2 seconds they've changed their mind and have been putting massive amounts of money into them. I mean a story from the Air and Space forces magazine just 2 days ago say that the fiscal budget request reports shows that by 2030 they will have upgraded them with about 7.8 billion dollars. that's not including the 3.8 billion they spent between 2020 and 2022.

@encross8058

15 күн бұрын

It's probably copied off of the old version so it's a fair comparison in that regard

@dallasyap3064

11 күн бұрын

@@Animeaniac215 Those upgrades are to give them extra juice to fight, due to growing threats, until NGAD is fully operational and will slowly replace the F-22, which will be in the mid 2030s.

@J_X999

5 күн бұрын

cope

americans always said “SU-57 sucks,J-20 is trash”, so idk if this is real or just a made out, just to make american looks still the best in air forces

@tubois2025

3 күн бұрын

That’s what I’m thinking

3:20 I've never heard of after burners showing up on radar however the ability to supercruise is important because afterburners burn a ridiculous amount of fuel as well as reducing the IR signature 5:30 A. most countries don't have IR guided bvr missiles so even aircraft with infrared search and track wouldn't be able to engage a stealth fighter with out a radar lock or being close enough to fire a fox2 B. The thing about stealth is if it gets close enough you're going to get a return so it's not like a stealth aircraft is immune to a radar guided missile C. It's worth noting that the f22 is being updated to have a infrared search and track system installed in fact it's scheduled for testing around this time of year

@jakammor4449

Ай бұрын

“Wouldn’t be able to engage without radar lock. . .” With that logic what’s the point of IRST? I’m pretty sure that you can guide a radar guided missile with IRST, so you can use a radar guided missile as soon as you can see the enemy, regardless of how you find them.

@JarrodFrates

Ай бұрын

BVR missiles to date are radar-guided, but with datalink relays already on place, a BVR IR missile isn't impossible. You can have one plane ID the target, relay it to a launch platform that is running silent, the launch platform sends it off, and the missile heads to the target, getting a handoff to the targeting plane for mid-course correction and then taking over final targeting on its own. The advantage is no radar signal to pick up, and the missile can come in from an unexpected direction.

@antoniohagopian213

29 күн бұрын

@@jakammor4449 you're pretty sure of nonsense. If you use the irst to lock something the radar can't find the missile will not track anything and wilk simply go off the rail. The Soviets used those long ago and that's why they had long range fox2 and the ability to "focus" the radar by using the electro optical system. The main use however has always been high off boresight fox2 missiles for dogfights since it moves with the pilot's head and has way more movement upwards then what the radar has. The Russians have perfected their implementation and use of those. And no fail35 is junk and can't do that because it's irst is under the nose instead of above. Because it's not a fighter not matter how hard they claim is it. Instead of using a targeting pod they built it in the nose. Basically copying the Su-25T.

@nem1

29 күн бұрын

​@@antoniohagopian213BVR missiles are guided by the firing plane for the majority of their flights. Radar-guided missiles only rely on their own radars at relatively close ranges, where stealth is less effective. Missiles can receive updated targeting data throughout their flights. The source of that data isnt relevant because, whether the firing solution comes from radar or IR, the information is transmitted to the missile via code. In short, an F-35 can certainly fire an AMRAAM and guide it to target using solely IRST

@acompletelynormalhuman6392

29 күн бұрын

@@jakammor4449 part of the use is for dogfighting a short range IR guided missile like the aim 9 only has a relatively small bore sight so it won't be able to see a bandit if the nose of the aircraft isn't pointing at or near the bandit however an aircraft with a IRST can provide targeting data to the missile, so a pilot can fire a missile at the bandit regardless of relative positions just by looking at the bandit the most famous example of this is the F35. other than that though IRST systems are way shorter range than radars (gernorius estimates put their range at 30 miles) they could be useful for identifying contacts

J-20 is basically doing what F-104 Starfighter and F-4 Phantom does in the Cold War. While the J-35 is equivalent to F-35A and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.

The problem with reverse engineering is that you do not learn what doesn’t work, and why.

why is the F22 being matched up against the J20? what is the point? The large range distances in the pacific will result in engagements between F22 and J20 few and far between, considering how they have to operate from land bases such as Guam/Korea/Japan etc. wouldn't it make more sense to compare the J20 with F35C? where carrier operations will allow them to operate nearer to chinese shores, and thus more likely to engage J20?

@TheWebstaff

29 күн бұрын

Or the new FX.

@CalvinHsuChen

29 күн бұрын

Cause everyone is obsessed with F22 even the CCP trolls are secretly a F22 fanboy maybe even Winnie the Xi is probably a secret F22 fanboy. It's funny just look how China is trying so hard to copy F22 they even send spies to USA to steal the blueprints.

@philipthecow

27 күн бұрын

The primary thing that makes the F22 irrelevant is that it's not being produced any more and there are only 186 F22s; many of which are non operational at any given moment.

@dallasyap3064

11 күн бұрын

Those carriers can come under attack from Chinese navy too. So those carriers will definitely be staying quite a distance away.

@Orion.401

11 күн бұрын

@@dallasyap3064 correct. But no relevance to the topic above.

What happens when two stealth fighters approach each other but can’t see one another? You’re gonna want a gun then.

@halo1011998

29 күн бұрын

That’s why the f22 and f35 can still dogfight and has cannons

@nomad_grj

29 күн бұрын

@@halo1011998 if im not mistaken, only the f35a has guns internally

@moe_is_justice8559

28 күн бұрын

You have something called High off Boresight IR missiles. Plus, stealth doesn't mean invisible, just reduced visibility. At 10 Km stealth isn't gonna do much to save you from an AESA radar and an Aim120, PL15 to the face. This is why there's a thing called the MAR or the no escape zone for missiles.

@haakonht

28 күн бұрын

@@nomad_grjYeah, *only* 95% of all F-35's manufactured to date.

@69th_Up-Tier_SQ

27 күн бұрын

The close range high off bore-sight missile come in handy in this situation aswell... cant forget about those AIM-9Xs or the russian Archer R-74Ms.

The J-20 might have *some* advantages over the F-22, such as the F-22 having less capable sensors - but the F-35 still holds just about everything over the J-20 besides maneuverability and range.

@andyturbo

Ай бұрын

+ it cannot supercruise (the F-35)

@JohnJohnson-ze1gg

Ай бұрын

F-22 just completed a 3 Billion dollar makeover, including the sensors from the F-35. Yes it can even see behind itself

@johnsilver9338

Ай бұрын

Of the 3 heavyweight dual engine stealth aircraft J-20 is the least maneuverable. It has the slowest minimum turn rate. You can even see this at the recent Zhuhai airshow. It's not a fighter but an interceptor meant to take out large aircraft like AWACS and tankers with PL-15. F-35C on the other hand has Typhoon's wing loading and can replicate the same tight turns F-22 or Su-57 can do in a dogfight. While F-35A has Gripen's wing loading. But most importantly J-20 don't have a gun. So its better for J-20 to hit then run instead of initiating dogfights.

@Someoneishere114

Ай бұрын

@@JohnJohnson-ze1ggno, it didn’t contract signed doesn’t equal to just getting the things done NGAD should be the new focus

@Mycatsbirthdayparty

29 күн бұрын

-cope from armchair westoid who happens to also be a PLA air force general 😂

Unbiased videos are essential. who wins in real world will be decided in conflicts/wars.

"Mighty Dragon" more like "Crippled Iguana".

As a Chinese lemme try to answer some of this in a nutshell for those who don't wanna watch the entire thing Was J20 stolen?: yes and no or at least 80% of it. Go research Subin f35 and f22 then you will come across one of the biggest compromises of US military intelligence. F22 and F35 were partially stolen and C17 was also stolen which lead to the development of Y20 Did it use russian engines?: Initially yes but now switched to a more stable ws15 engines but pretty much just reversed engineered russian ones with slightly better life span and thrust by a decent margin a decent margin Time gap advantages?: Hardly any for J20. F22 was designed to dominate the skies for the next couple of decades when it first flew which US already accounted for enemies having stealth technology as well. What they didn't account for is how would it try to dethrone the raptor from the 1st spot J20's sensors advantages over F-22: If we only look at this on paper then J20 dominates the f22 by a good amount. However, most of these crap we don't even know if it works properly but who knows? F22 is getting a couple billion dollar upgrade as well so nobody knows but the upgrade certainly removes the gap for sure. what I do know for certain is that J20 defo have a irst and head mount display advantage over the f22 since these tech russians have done it over and over again (even though the performance is dog water) why China needs J20: to project power outside of China specifically Taiwan and Japan duh. Also to match against American peers if US decided to interfere in Taiwan why doesn't it have a gun: When you have missiles as your primary weapon and you won't dogfight anyways why would you need it? US government response to J20?: the video mentions NGAD but the true threat still lies in pl15 being superior in range. Aim 260 was the response Overall J20 should not be feared but taken seriously for sure. A jet is a jet just like a gun. A shitty gun can still kill people like how a higher quality gun would. J20 may not be invincible or good against F22 or F35s but certainly a bigger than ever threat to 4th gens and tankers

@marvinpostadan3484

Ай бұрын

It was not theft! It was a calculated release of stealth technology.China will take 30 years to prove out stealth technology also The reason Americans released limited stealth to China is that the military have a counter technology. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@brolydictcumberbatchmontou401

Ай бұрын

I'll quote you on that "A jet is a jet just like a gun. A shitty gun can still kill people like how a higher quality gun would." And I will have to counter If you if paired against F22 and F35 pilots the one difference is those pilots have seen several long term expanded campaigns and multiple engagements. It's sort of like coming in being the latest kid with a knife against hardened veterans with a smaller knife.

@Someoneishere114

Ай бұрын

You are clearly a person who is working for China and try to disguise your opponents Nice try!😂

@bryf2787

Ай бұрын

As a Chinese you failed your country. Go back into the wall.

@xdas11

Ай бұрын

Totally agree with you but from what I understood he's only talking about the machines like he said "on paper" @@brolydictcumberbatchmontou401

"Made in China" is synonymous with "Quality".

@_earlyworm

28 күн бұрын

uhhhhhh

@Snake-ms7sj

28 күн бұрын

😄

@minedgravy380

27 күн бұрын

hate to break it to you but very little is made without the use of chinese parts, Capitalism goes brrr

@Ugly_German_Truths

27 күн бұрын

@@minedgravy380 aaaaand that gave us the blissful future of "planned obsolescence" wehre things do no longer hold for 15 or 20 years but break down after the warranty expires or when the next generation is launched into the market...

@humbleopionist4366

27 күн бұрын

@@Ugly_German_Truths Sorry to break it to you but lightbulb manufacturers started with planned obsolescence started in 1932. The advent of making things in China has nothing to do with it, so before you keep spouting things you don’t understand please consider that not everything reflects your worldview on other countries.

Sandboxx news has a video about all the upgrades the F-22s are currently getting, including infrared search and track targeting pods.

To be honest, no matter where the J20's technology comes from, the J20 looks really cool.

I didn't know Wish was a defense contractor.

@brolydictcumberbatchmontou401

Ай бұрын

it's the Samsnug j20. like the Samsnug TV. Any way why do they say we should fear it? If it has it no record for being battle tested in several actual extended campaigns. With pilots who have been in real air to air engagements. It is nothing to fear. You need Top Gun trained fighters as all the tech doesn't mean nothing. lol

@viochrys5412

29 күн бұрын

@@brolydictcumberbatchmontou401 Samsung is korean bruh, I think you meant huawei my g

@brolydictcumberbatchmontou401

29 күн бұрын

@@viochrys5412 i'm quite aware. It's a meme where some one show there tv on and it say samsnung when you turn it on a knock off chinese tv copying the south korean brand ve cause Neki shoes tuslas cars? thats what im saying the j20 is. Another chinese counterfit is. balles sunglasses that mkdolnads sandwich looks tasty.

@brolydictcumberbatchmontou401

29 күн бұрын

@@viochrys5412 Dankpods channel covered that meme

@brolydictcumberbatchmontou401

29 күн бұрын

@@viochrys5412 samsnugs j20 its the real deal it's not counterfeit.

Nope. Both F-35 and F-22 still has the 1st kill opportunity maybe even a 2nd one as J-20 is already proven to be less stealthy.

@helpmedaddyjesus7099

Ай бұрын

Hypothetically i could see the j20 spotting the f35 first though, with VHF radars placed on islands in the south china sea the j20 could maybe know where to point its radars and have an estimated range and direction of an f35 before the f35 is even within amraam range (this assumes that the radar stations can communicate with commanders on land. So it might be good to focus on jamming comms if you're going against china)

@jtl05

Ай бұрын

@@helpmedaddyjesus7099 Everyone can see stealth aircraft with EWR or other radars (low frequency) the hard part is getting a high enough data track with a weapons radar (high frequency) to be able to engage the target.

@SilvaDroid

Ай бұрын

Source?

@kameronjones7139

Ай бұрын

​@@helpmedaddyjesus7099 those really aren't accurate enough at range for that

@johnsilver9338

Ай бұрын

1ST. Their is a 3rd party radar scattering CAD simulation done on Aircraft 101. Without RAM coatings, they compared all 3 F-35, J-20, and Su-57 low observable LO characteristics through their shapes/geometry alone. Data is taken from basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics()wordpress. Replace () with a . In a 20x20deg frontal aspect, "J-20 RCS is higher than F-35A RCS through the frequency range (approximately 3.5 times in X-band, 1.5 times in VHF band), it still has much better RCS characteristic when compared to Su-57.” This mean even with the same RAM coatings used on the F-35, J-20 much more Su-57 can’t make up the difference in total RCS reduction given their LO properties/geometry. So F-35 definitely has the “first look, first shoot, first kill” in beyond visual range BVR. 2ND. Both Pacific Air Force (PACAF) head Gen. Wilsbach and US Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Brown assessment of J-20 as “It’s not anything to lose a lot of sleep over” when F-35s were able to close in on J-20s and observe them near Japan. 3RD. J-20's canards and the whole vertical stabilizers are moving.

The upgrades to the f22 should help it be a bit more capable. Stealth drop tanks, irst pods etc. we shouldn’t discount the j20 but it’s also set up around a different role and I’m betting we have systems capable of getting a weapons grade lock on such a relatively large radar target

I love this guy’s voice! It’s like a Simpson’s construct of a far Eastern Charles Bronson. Superb.

@Badoonk

Ай бұрын

💀

@ambientcyan

Ай бұрын

If you enjoy this guy's voice you might look up some videos with the old Formula 1 TV announcer Murray Walker. Their way of speaking are very similar

U.S. is moving on from the F22 with the NGAD, which has significant technological upgrades. What we don't know is the quality build of the J-20. It's already a maintenance nightmare with the F-22, only because the quality of maintenance and technical support is important. Who knows what the Chinese are going through.

@trailblazer632

Ай бұрын

Well.... their icbms are using water as fuel sooo😂

@andrewsuryali8540

28 күн бұрын

NGAD will cost $ 300 million EACH. They'll build five then Congress will cancel them. Also, with Boeing in shambles and Northrop Grumman basically telling the USAF to fuck off after the unfair treatment they got in the ATF program, the only possible dev for the plane is Lockheed. No chance for competition, no chance to lower costs.

@andrewsuryali8540

28 күн бұрын

​@@trailblazer632 That's a stupid mistranslation. All Chinese missiles use solid fuel. What the defector was saying was the Chinese idiom, "injecting water", which actually means inflating a budget. It means the Chinese MIC have been charging the government more than they should and the generals skim off the extra cash. It shows that their MIC is as corrupt as, if not even more than, any regular Western MIC.

"Mom can we have a stealth fighter?" "We have stealth fighter at home" The stealth fighter at home:

Lots of variables. I am still considering what the game will be for Meteor and AMRAAM BVR and the role of gunships associated with stealth units.

@mugbeer9440

Ай бұрын

aim 260

The J-20 is like a stealthy version of the Su-30 , has little in common with the F-22

Hope you can have a video about Type055

@freeride6180

6 күн бұрын

🇺🇸There is no medium voltage DC drive technology, so it is impossible to assemble four bands of high-power radar 🙊🙈🙉, and they do not have YJ-21! They can't brag, they can't make videos, F22 can only rely on balloons to prove themselves, J20 has produced more than 500!😊😊😊

The plane is as good as the pilot makes it we don't fear cuz we know the ins and outs we have great pilots

@philipthecow

27 күн бұрын

Ok Maverick, this is the real world where the plane makes a big difference. This expression only came about because American pilots were notably at a disadvantage due to soviets fielding better planes in Korea.

Good thing the f22 is getting an upgrade that includes an IRST sensor

"... the heat signature of the afterburners would be visible on radars..." Uh... no. No, it wouldn't. Radar doesn't pick up heat signatures. Infrared sensors is what it would pop up on. (Which, by the way, is more of a "your missiles can't get a reliable target lock on me" than "you don't even know I'm here" type of issue.)

Stock footage - check Wikipedia 'facts' - check no new or interesting info - check ... Yep it's a 'not what you think' video....

suuure, yeah... fear it...

@jr-ft3oz

Ай бұрын

Why not?

@ViperF-22

Ай бұрын

It shouldn’t be feared, at least compared to what we (The U.S.) has. The J-20 is a very capable fighter, but it would be blown out of the sky before it can get a lock on an F-35 or F-22. The J-20 is an Su-57 made from plastic. Lmao.

@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko

Ай бұрын

@@ViperF-22 You mean the same F-22 that is retiring in 2030? Also, what's the top speed of F-35? Oh yes, Mach 1.6. GG America

@TheDisassemble

Ай бұрын

⁠america changed its mind we aren’t retiring the 22s

@ignorantethan656

Ай бұрын

@@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko fighter jets aren't Bugattis, they aren't based around top speed

Not having a gun might not make that much of a difference. Everything nowadays is largely engaging beyond the visible range and if that isn't working something completely different has to engage instead, such as ground-based AA systems. Dogfighting is something of an old era where visible-range fighting was the main way of fighting.

The J20 looks like the F22 had an affair with the Rafale

Mom, can I have an F-35? We have F-35s at home F-35s at home:

@elmohead

Ай бұрын

Not even close. China's version of the F35 is the J35.

@gumpyoldbugger6944

Ай бұрын

@@elmohead yup......

@Mycatsbirthdayparty

29 күн бұрын

But the J-20 doesn't have water submerging capabilities like f-35s though 😂

@zackk7175

29 күн бұрын

Made-in-Chiina cheap craap？ No, thank you, Mom said!

@zackk7175

29 күн бұрын

@@Mycatsbirthdayparty So, South Chiina Sea actually does Not belong to Chiina, right?! And why can USS battle ships cross Taiiwan Strait every month but Chiina say nothing? Is it true Chiina plans to invade Taiiwan but actually it can not even blockade the strait?

china "copies" something it wants but it lacks one thing that no one can copy, the experience of using it effectively in war

@mehrazmahmud

Ай бұрын

yeah because your nation always do war here and there... warmongers

@naroly7880

Ай бұрын

F22? which war?

@SucksToTellTheTruth

Ай бұрын

I think he meant, they have not figured out the correct military doctrine to go with stealth. They are relatively new to the game, and murica already has decades of expierience.

@mehmetbozkurt3274

Ай бұрын

Y'all gotta stop spitting this bullshit like a broken record and wrap your head around the reality. Chinese have long surpassed the Russians and they are the real military threat. Their aircraft and missiles are much better than Russian designs they "copied" from.

@thilde007

Ай бұрын

@@naroly7880the 2023 balloon war

Your idea of the J20 is much higher than it’s actual capabilities 😊

The f22 is getting a major upgrade to include more advanced avionics and targeting, including irst and others. This will be a major jump for the f22 and help it to bridge the gap to the 6th gen fighters that are coming. As well as providing a test platform for some of the tech planned for 6th gen fighters.. It an even match the j20 isn't a match for even the f35, let alone the f22. The problem is if there are enough j20s to overwhelm the systems of allied forces in the area...

The US navy & military learned a valuable lesson during the Vietnam war. At first US fighters did not have any guns for dog fighting and the US military soon went back to a gun or cannon for all fighter aircraft. The kill ratio went up greatly against enemy aircraft after that. I don't believe any western pilot or aviator would want to go into combat without his/her aircraft being armed with a gun today. Shalom

@CalvinHsuChen

29 күн бұрын

That was decades ago. Today its all about stealth and BVR tech.

@gildedbear5355

29 күн бұрын

@@CalvinHsuChen That's kind of what they said before Vietnam too. "we don't need guns, we'll engage with missiles beyond visual range." It turned out that a gun is super good to have if you ever find yourself in visual range. (or if the other guy keeps jamming your missiles)

@YTRINX

28 күн бұрын

@@gildedbear5355 also because politicians interfered and forced the pilots to get a visual before engaging which made them more useless.

Excellent video CCP approves +1000 social credit points

@johnjingleheimersmith9259

Ай бұрын

I think you're missing the point of the video. And I doubt the CCP would "approve" a video saying that China has a long history of technological theft.

@NotWhatYouThink

Ай бұрын

1000 social credit points? lol We won't even mention China for less than 1M social credit points 😁

@tomizou5558

Ай бұрын

@@NotWhatYouThink as a person who lives in china I can relate

@subasthapa4839

Ай бұрын

Coping at its finest

@bensonchannel1511

Ай бұрын

@@subasthapa4839 can you stop meatriding china?

Sure it shouldn’t be ignored however I’d say it’s advantages are outweighed by it’s disadvantages. Additionally in long range combat the missiles a plane carries are an extremely important aspect, one that tends to be hard to find data on for obvious reasons

us stealth fighter outfit : stolen, reseach, research, research, research, research chinese fighter outfit : stolen, stolen, stolen, stolen

That this is one of the best youtube channels is, indeed, what I think

@Heat_Wave2024

Ай бұрын

I also think

They might not have the quality but they definitely do have the ability to make large QUANTITY of aircraft

@SaraphDarklaw

Ай бұрын

Quantity is a quality all its own.

Then can you show at 0.2m^2 or RCS, what radar band does the data apply to?

The F35 guns is a mistake, base on the little I know About it. The whole aircraft is made for BVR, you get there, you shoot them down, and none has noticed you. If one of them manages to make it a dog fight, you are in trouble. One quick, 737-max style, solution is to just ditch the machine guns and add sensor on their place and more counter measures. That is like one or two tons worth of stuff you can cram in there, without adding much weight or changing flight characteristics. Yes, that means the F-35 would be out once the missiles are depleted, but in stealth.. once you fired your shots, you should have been long gone.

THEY COPIED EVERYTHING BUT THEY CANNOT COPY WHAT THEY DO NOT KNOW !!! THE QUESTION IS WHO IS GIVING THEM THE INFORMATION???

@kountrygunz2032

Ай бұрын

hes in prison already

@guatf1

Ай бұрын

Yet they can use their on findings and knowledge.

@r3ck17rick7

Ай бұрын

your mom

@derrenwongsodiharjo

Ай бұрын

War Thunder Players.

@zpmayes

Ай бұрын

@@kountrygunz2032 only one of them is in prison

"The heat signature would be visible on radars..." Yeah checks out just like my Geiger counter registers dead batteries or a thermometer can spot people talking out of their ass on radio. And don't come up with "ionization due to heat leads to radio reflections".

@teaboy8362

Ай бұрын

He probably meant IRST, and if some viewers don’t know what that is it’s easier to just say radar instead of explaining it

@DasIllu

Ай бұрын

@@teaboy8362Half a sentence would have been enough to clear that up on a channel that wants to educate people. It was negligence and it reflects.

@antoniohagopian213

Ай бұрын

​@@teaboy8362no it's clearly 0 knowledge and just yapping propaganda at every single opportunity. Balloon popper "unmatched air to air"

Though the J-20 is designed as sort of a long-range interceptor, to intercept and interdict particularly AWACs, tankers, comms relay etc; the F-35 will have no problem detecting and tracking them from several hundred miles with its AN/AAQ-37 EODAS. Furthermore, the F-35 can transmit and share this info to other fighters, AWACs, Navy ships or even ground assets.

@jerrytom5841

Күн бұрын

These technologies are not mysterious. China's j35 can also do it. These technologies are no longer new technologies. The United States should speed up innovation, such as unmanned combat aircraft or sixth-generation aircraft. Now, although the United States is still leading, China is catching up very quickly, and the United States should increase its speed.

I like how you just quietly tried to add the fact that the f35 would be in the picture as well as if that doesn't almost relegate the entire point of this video to the garbage can. Not to mention NGAD

That new Chinese AEW plane looks strangely familiar!

The no-gun strategy will come back to bite them. Unlike the video, I would argue a head-to-head fight between stealth aircraft is actually MORE likely to end in a dog fight. Between that and the upgrades the F22 is currently getting it is going to be an uphill battle for the J20. It will still largely come down to the pilot in the plane though.

@salamaahmedbalash6548

Ай бұрын

nah it's not the 1980s any more , MAR of the modern missile(minnimum abort range) of sth like the aim 120d id 40-30 kilometers . that is the point where u cant evade the missile. so yeah it will not ba great proplem

@Finis08

Ай бұрын

@@salamaahmedbalash6548 except when talking about stealth aircraft where those missiles will have a much higher likelihood of missing, even when fired from within the MAR, or never locking on in the first place. Hopefully, things will never get to the point where we have to find who is correct on this one though. At this point, it is largely just speculation on behalf of both sides.

@salamaahmedbalash6548

Ай бұрын

@@Finis08 i a agree 👍 👍 and yes hopefully not.

@johnsilver9338

28 күн бұрын

In BVR its the stealthier plane. In WVR though its the pilot. But both F-22 and F-35A besides being more stealthier also have an internal gun. So in both cases J-20 is likely to be eaten. Not to mention F-35s are the only aircraft that can literally see through their cockpit which will be a huge advantage in a dogfight.

@salamaahmedbalash6548

28 күн бұрын

@@johnsilver9338 wait what ? f35 in a dogfight is a sitting duck . f35 is horrible dogfighter . and a dogfight is impossiple i gurantee it is because of the mar

Why isn't anyone talking about the fact that task and purpose just covered this video

@F3CKTHEZIOS

25 күн бұрын

ah 'task and purpose' and 'not what you think' two American military propaganda channel is really reliable for military tech about others

@makerj514

25 күн бұрын

@@F3CKTHEZIOS exactly

Calling the Chinese or Russian jets stealth is a massive misrepresentation of facts

"Guns aren't necessary in modern fighter aircraft because new long-range munitions technology makes close range dogfights unlikely." -Tell that to early F-4 Phantom pilots during the Vietnam War.

@trailblazer632

Ай бұрын

The us learned that lesson the hard way. Its why even the f22 and f35 still have guns.

@lmn6335

Ай бұрын

That era is over

@trailblazer632

Ай бұрын

​@lmn6335 uh huh. Thats what the us politicians said then to. They were wrong. And so are you. Having a backup gun in a fighter is always necessary. Especially if multiple stealth fighters are in the air bypassing radar systems and getting progressively closer before engaging, or being stealthy enough to avoid long range missiles.

@fidjeenjanrjsnsfh

Ай бұрын

Except Washington specifically demanded that F4 pilots visually ID their targets at the time. This is the most important context people often forget. Also dogfighting was unnecessary if you just bomb the aircraft on the ground, which was what pilots during Vietnam demanded from higher up, and also what they did during desert storm. Also you mentioned "early F-4" which means later F-4s didn't have as much problem since they had renewed air combat tactics. It was a question of training, not equipment because much later F-4s didn't have guns.

@lmn6335

Ай бұрын

@@trailblazer632 Haha, it's really over. You know what the air combat instructors say? -- Instructors; Why do stealth fighters engage in dog fights? Cadet - because we have more maneuverability - Instructor: No, because you're stupid

no mention of the recent 16 billion dollar upgrade to the f22 adding technology that this video says it lacks

@silveriver9

Ай бұрын

Who fled Afgnstn in the middle of the night? 😂

Very recently, the DOD upgraded the F-22 and a picture of these upgrades were captured, showing the Raptor with its own special radar reflecting fuel tanks under the wings and mostly unknown detection pods on the outer portion of the wings

China say, "You build NGAD, we'll copy it from you" 😂 (Improving it as well too 😋).

Radars do not detect infrared signature.

@IndianArma

Ай бұрын

But irst does.

@alex3261

Ай бұрын

@@IndianArma IRST does indeed. At one point,the narrator mentioned that the radar detects the IR signature

@IndianArma

Ай бұрын

@alex3261 aha, I missed that.

@alex3261

Ай бұрын

@@IndianArma At minute 3.55, while discussing the engines.

@IndianArma

Ай бұрын

@@alex3261 got you 👍

While I agree the West should respect the J-20, fear is not an appropriate word choice. The J-20 was built to attack naval assets, as China felt it was the greatest threat from the West. The one area that should be considered is how the F-22 is being upgraded with IR tracking and stealthy external fuel tanks. Sandboxx News has a great video on it. Also, as for dogfighting being dead, think about it, with planes all having stealth, they will need to close into closer distances to detect and ultimately engage each other, thus providing more opportunities for dogfighting rather than less. The US learned its lesson about not having guns on its planes in Vietnam.

@joseamor9319

Ай бұрын

Amen Brother!!

@ArizonaAstraLLC

Ай бұрын

You mentioned your own counterpoint. IR sensors are currently at the technological level where they allow for BVR engagements. Stealth aircraft do not negate a BVR engagement possibility, they simply shorten the distance of their own detection. Not having guns on fighters in Vietnam was not the cause of problem directly as many incorrectly say, it was the fact that 1960s US air combat doctrine was primarily focused on safety as opposed to correctly imitating threats. Many forget that the F-8 Crusader was used heavily in the conflict and was armed with guns, and after the Air Force added an autocannon to the F4, only a handful of gun kills were achieved. Missile technology was severely immature for air-to-air missiles in the 1960s, but you cannot say the same today especially since BVR air combat became the norm in the 1980s in the Iran Iraq War, was further demonstrated in the Gulf War, was exclusively done over Serbia (all NATO air-to-air kills were BVR in this conflict) and now today over Ukraine, it is demonstrated every single day. Ukrainian pilots themselves list the MiG-31BM and Su-35S armed with R-77-1's and especially R-37M's as the single greatest threat to their own aircraft fleet. Not one gun kill in this whole war

@ArizonaAstraLLC

Ай бұрын

Now also while you overall have educated points, I would also like to point out that the J-20 was not designed to attack naval surface assets - that's the H-6's job. The J-20 is a heavy long-range air superiority fighter, intended to destroy enablers. The J-20 + PL-15 pairing is designed with a role in mind: 1) destroy American and Japanese AWACS, tankers, ISR nodes, and logistical support 2) destroy the F-16V's and less advanced fighters of the Taiwanese. F-16V's with AESA radars and AIM-120C-8s as well as the Taiwanese Sky Sword are quite a threat to the Su-30MKK's of the Chinese, but they would be under incredible danger under BVR engagement against 5th gen assets. They don't have much of an interest in going toe-to-toe with Japanese F-35s and American F-22's - they want to use their anti-access/aerial denial to make it extremely inconvenient for them to operate nearby in the first place. The SAM network but literally the part where they want to use the vast distances over the South China Sea to make it logistically impossible for advanced Japanese and American assets to operate there. Do you see where I'm going with this? And before anybody calls me a Chinese bot, I'm American as they get, in my page isn't some drop page, I actually post content. I simply care about having an objective analysis that is politically agnostic so we can actually get somewhere and deal with the threat accurately. Air supremacy is not an American birthright.

@Someoneishere114

Ай бұрын

⁠@@ArizonaAstraLLCXu Jinping knows less about J-20 compared to you good analysis

@bryf2787

Ай бұрын

​@@ArizonaAstraLLCwell done American, you beat the other Chinese who made a horrible analysis.

I REALLY hope OUR GOVT has some tricks and talent up their sleeves to help our fighters till the new one is ready to go in use.

What confuses me about the j-20 is the canards and the fact it has no gun to pair with them they are only useful in close up engagements as much as guns are. makes me think the design team had originally different intentions for the j-20 and politics made them change it.

Even the mighty F-22 Raptor didn't use it's guns against a weather balloon that isn't flying very fast.. and uses not 1 but 2 AIM-9X .. amazing kills

@McCaroni_Sup

28 күн бұрын

Why wouldn't you use standoff munitions against a balloon whose altitude exceeds the operational capabilities of your aircraft? And not to mention that even if it did use it's guns or was in gun range, balloons don't go down as easily as you think. There have been times when balloons were shot multiple times and not downed. Missiles were the correct choice here. Maybe read up on how it all actually went down before commenting. Lest you risk pulling a Dunning Kreuger.

@gelrond9958

25 күн бұрын

The Canadians already tried guns and they didn’t work because a balloon is more robust so the guns wouldn’t kill it. Since the Canadians already fired enough shots to equal a missile the US didn’t want to be a laughing stock and just fired 2 missiles for a guaranteed kill.

Son: can we have f22 please Mom: we have f22 home The f22 at home be like

@zackk7175

29 күн бұрын

Made-in-Chiina cheap craap？ No, thank you, Mom said!

Many times platforms (main battletanks) or tactics (dog fighting) have been dismissed as obsolete. The trade off of fuel/avionics vs having a gun is understandable, however dog fighting with guns may not be out dated yet. Thoughts?

“Towers over the F-35 with more J-20’s in production?!” 15 jets mean THAT much?!

The West: 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣😂🤣🤣🤣 Also the West: Did you forget we have the F-22 and the F-35?!?!?

@nero995

Ай бұрын

explain ..?

@andyturbo

Ай бұрын

I am 'The West" and like @nero995 would love you to explain please

@Animeaniac215

Ай бұрын

@@nero995 He's saying why is he talking about the F-22 when it would be the F-35 that would more than likely fight it as the F-22 isn't carrier capable, let alone not mentioning the the 3.5 billion dollar investment into the F-22 upgrade package from 2020-2022 and it is still on going to bring the entire fleet into the modern day capability. They aren't getting rid of them they are making them deadlier than ever. Most of this comes across as either lazy research or just straight Chinese propaganda.

@johndoe8785

Ай бұрын

@@Animeaniac215 yep and the F-35 being piloted by a bunch of drunk wetodded kids could wipe out China's entire Air Force, on a Tuesday, and be home for lunch with the fam.

@johndoe8785

Ай бұрын

@@andyturbo nah cupcake, you lost that privilege the second you realized you didn't know what I was talking about.

“Your blue chews device is weddy to pair” (yes i know it’s spelled “ready”)

@mugbeer9440

Ай бұрын

you spelled ready wrong

@Doge_Spartan

Ай бұрын

you spelled ready wrong

@Syvern.

Ай бұрын

you spelled Bluetooth wrong

It's really kind of weird to not mention the stealth capability of the j20 all throughout the video, and then compare its production numbers to the F-22 kind of implying that us overall production numbers are lower even though you completely negated the f-35 production numbers as well

That NGAD looks like the fictional stealth AI jet from the movie "Stealth"

Although I agree the j-20 radar cross section isn’t great you have to consider the direction on how a radar system hits the j-20. The direction and angle plays a big role. It could be semi decent in a head on but I doubt it would be even considered stealth if tracked from an odd angle. This Also applies to the bottom belly of an f-35 for example. A radar cross section isnt static is what I’m trying to say. The Canards of the j-20 is also pretty bad in keeping its stealth characteristics.

Can't wait for new TopGun: chinese version

@Someoneishere114

Ай бұрын

Actually we all know how obsolete Russian air force just became…

@Mycatsbirthdayparty

29 күн бұрын

Daydream your hollywood fantasies then realize reality isn't the same just like losing and retreating against Vietnamese farmers 😂

The J20's numerical superiority suggests "a target-rich environment" for U.S. aircraft . . .

Also worth comparing the claimed rcs of f35 vs f22. Huge difference there

Made in China so should not be an issue

@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko

Ай бұрын

F-35 isn't an issue either. It's a flying lemon

@L.L

Ай бұрын

@@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko I think fighter jet are not much of an asset this day and age

@subasthapa4839

Ай бұрын

Yes

@Purplegreen45

Ай бұрын

@@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko and yet countries are scrambling to buy them. deluded commie.

@nero995

Ай бұрын

are you a bot perchance?@@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko

I spit my coffee right after i read the title.

Just felt poised it point out: the rcs table you show at 0:15 is wrong. While the actual rcs specs of these planes are unknown, the f-35’s is significantly smaller than the f-22’s

Why is this channel so good??

Oh man... Just looks at those comments. Those "expert" doesn't even know what they are even talking about. Even the us official actually feared it and do not underestimate it. And most of them didn't even watch the video till the end.

We will find out when the J20 and F22/F35 gets updated into War Thunder. Secret documents will start flying around.

Doctrine and logistics might be key players in the match up