My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available! Amazon: amzn.to/3Jj3ZnS Bookshop (a collection of indie publishers): bookshop.org/books/the-power-of-and-frustration-with-our-supreme-court-100-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about-with-mr-beat/9781684810680 Barnes and Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-matt-beat/1142323504?ean=9781684810680 Amazon UK: www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+power+of+our+supreme+court&crid=3R59T7TQ6WKI3&sprefix=the+power+of+our+supreme+courth%2Caps%2C381&ref=nb_sb_noss Mango: mango.bz/books/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-2523-b Target: www.target.com/p/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-paperback/-/A-86273023 Walmart: www.walmart.com/ip/The-Power-of-Our-Supreme-Court-How-the-Supreme-Court-Cases-Shape-Democracy-Paperback-9781684810680/688487495 Chapters Indigo: www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/the-power-of-our-supreme/9781684810680-item.html?ikwid=The+Power+of+Our+Supreme+Court&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=0#algoliaQueryId=eab3e89ad34051a62471614d72966b7e

@kieranrollinson8750

Жыл бұрын

TIME 5:12 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 59% AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!! 24% NEW YORK POPULATION AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT A WAY TO MANIPULATE STATISTICS!!!!!!!!! AFRICAN AMERICANS ARE 13% OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! YET, AFRICAN AMERIDCANS COMMIT 50% OF ALL VIOLENT CRIME IN AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! THEREFORE, ONE WOULD EXPECT, WITH DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF AFRICAN AMERICANS, THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE OF AMERICA; THERE WOULD, SUBSEQUENTLY, BE DOUBLE THE RATE OF VIOLENT CRIMES BEING COMMITTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D

I've noticed that Ohio has a lot of Supreme Court Briefs Cases that are important and infamous

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Mapp v. Ohio, Brandenburg v. Ohio, Euclid v. Ambler to name a few. :)

@Gamenetreviews

4 жыл бұрын

I’ve noticed a lot of New York law being important. Cardozo being one of the most famous judges despite spending most of his career in New York courts.

@MrSterlingAce

3 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat And a VERY VERY important case that is ignored in almost every Criminal Court case: Beck v. Ohio. Law schools don't even talk about it.

@hangukhiphop

3 жыл бұрын

​I would imagine most of the legal stuff goes down in the most populated states with high racial diversity and immigrant populations.

@redplanet2720

Жыл бұрын

Can't even contravene the constitution in Ohio smh

The problem isn't in court's decision,but in the fact that term "reasonable suspicion" could be used for anything and PDs wouldn't be accountable if they did it wrong.

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly. I think they got it right with this decision, but failed to recognize the implications and unintended consequences.

@Matt_The_Hugenot

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat Though, as the court has just said, implications aren't always it's business, if the law or constitution needs amending that's up to Congress and the States.

@ML-ir5vo

4 жыл бұрын

Totally agree and my biggest issue with stop and search. In the UK, I was stopped for suspected drug possession (at the time, dressed with long hair and a bandana - in other words, like a hippy) on the basis of "they could smell weed off me" and you obviously cannot disprove scent. To make matters worse, I was with my girlfriend who was not searched, nor did I want to draw attention to her because I didn't want to see her being treated the same way. It was a completely discriminatory practice. If they thought I had drugs, surely anyone by association would also be suspicious and you'd also search them? Worst of all, it further causes that disconnect between police and communities - and that's coming from a non-threatening working class white guy. Must be a lot worse for minorities.

@mattgrele6318

4 жыл бұрын

@@ML-ir5vo the police saying they smell wees is what they use to search. 2 times i got pulled over and my car search "because they smell weed. Nothing was found and bsb i was let go. If nothing is found they let u go, if u got drugs then it will look like a good search

@Gorthug.

3 жыл бұрын

Matt Grele I mean does it smell like weed? Lol

6:04 As we all know, the six political sides are Left, Right, Center, Russia, Europe, and Canada

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

You must have glossed over how I also said "perspectives."

@edwardmiessner6502

3 жыл бұрын

You forgot the seventh and eighth sides: Mexico and "CHUYNA"

@hangukhiphop

3 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat ok fine six political _perspectives_

I think an important part of this case is the suspects suspicious behavior before the stop and frisk. If it was done today the police would need video of the behavior before they could stop and frisk, not an insurmountable requirement with today's technology.

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Today we do have the luxury of more easily documenting things to justify reasonable suspicion .

@ipsurvivor

3 жыл бұрын

There is no holding by any court , that I’m aware of, that requires video verification of suspicious activity prior to being able to perform a Terry Stop and/or a Terry frisk. Video has certainly been used to help establish that reasonable articulable suspicion was present at the time of many police encounters...but I haven’t seen where it is now required. Video has also had a huge impact on civil litigation (See Scott v. Harris, Supreme Court 2007) but there is still litigation that lacks video evidence. The credibility of witnesses is still what it has been for a long time.

@kieranrollinson8750

Жыл бұрын

TIME 5:12 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 59% AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!! 24% NEW YORK POPULATION AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT A WAY TO MANIPULATE STATISTICS!!!!!!!!! AFRICAN AMERICANS ARE 13% OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! YET, AFRICAN AMERIDCANS COMMIT 50% OF ALL VIOLENT CRIME IN AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! THEREFORE, ONE WOULD EXPECT, WITH DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF AFRICAN AMERICANS, THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE OF AMERICA; THERE WOULD, SUBSEQUENTLY, BE DOUBLE THE RATE OF VIOLENT CRIMES BEING COMMITTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D

@brunothebat4122

6 ай бұрын

@@iammrbeat I definitely agree, and this behavior seemed really suspicious.

@Chinook__

Ай бұрын

Do not rely of the fantasy that “today” we have more technology to prove the age old problem. That would be unwise and dismiss 99.9% of injustices worldwide.

YES. Supreme court briefs are my favorite.

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Glad you dig the series! :D

@mistake1197

4 жыл бұрын

I love supreme Court briefs.

@bm1x718

3 жыл бұрын

It's everyone's favourite

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

If they are… I would find a new person to listen to. This gentleman got this entire case wrong from beginning to end and he even made things up that aren’t true

@charliesarver

Жыл бұрын

@@DeleteLawz1984Evidence?

The Terry decision was based on the officer seeing Terry engaging in suspicious behavior. Stopping just anyone walking down the street is not what was intended at all. In fact, stopping people for no reason is a violation of the 4th amendment.

@ipsurvivor

3 жыл бұрын

It depends on what you mean by “stopping anyone walking down the street”. The police can approach anyone else in public just as other citizens may approach others to ask them questions or to give them information. The issue is whether the individual is free to go or not. In Terry v. Ohio, Terry and the two others weren’t detained until Officer McFadden physically seized them and searched their outer clothing.

@deezynar

3 жыл бұрын

@@ipsurvivor An officer in uniform is not like a regular citizen. His very presence creates an atmosphere of threat and intimidation because he has the legal power to arrest people. And cops have even killed innocent people. Officers should only stop someone when they have evidence the person was part of a crime. Stopping anyone for any other reason is a stressful intrusion. What's more, because officers are under orders to make arrests, they look for any indication of criminal activity and start to fish with questions. They do that even when they have no reason to think the individual they're talking to did anything illegal. They frequently make false arrests, but far more often than that, they take up peoples' precious time and bring them stress. They habitually stop people with the hope of finding unknown criminality, and that needs to stop. As I said in my O.P., the Terry Decision was based on the officer actually observing the person doing something suspicious before stopping him.

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

@@ipsurvivor No. you're wrong. And it's not even close to how incorrect you are. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html. LEARN the truth -- not the lies from this fraud.

@monkberrymoon4042

2 жыл бұрын

@@deezynar So..... what's your point? If the seizure is made based on no suspicion, then it's a bad stop. And what ever "stuff" the cop finds on the guy will be thrown out.

@deezynar

2 жыл бұрын

@@monkberrymoon4042 My point has been clearly explained. Cops should not stop or speak to anyone if they don't have evidence that the person committed a crime.

Do you agree with the Court in this case? Which Supreme Court case should I cover next for this series? Also, don't forget to download Newsvoice for free here to support my channel: newsvoice.com/mrbeat

@CommanderCodyCC

4 жыл бұрын

I love democracy

@lorenzjudeceloso2444

4 жыл бұрын

The latest one on Trump's Tax returns/ contraceptives for religious organization/ discrimination against Lgbtq rights

@whyamihere832

4 жыл бұрын

Democracy is Best

@alman666

4 жыл бұрын

Please do Planned Parenthood v Casey

@firstnamelastname7079

4 жыл бұрын

Do I agree?

Thanks for continuing to make the Supreme Court Briefs series. It's great to hear about these past cases that I would otherwise probably never hear about. Your videos are a perfect balance of historical context, case summary, and outcome. Keep them coming please.

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Well thanks for the kind words!

@kieranrollinson8750

Жыл бұрын

TIME 5:12 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 59% AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!! 24% NEW YORK POPULATION AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT A WAY TO MANIPULATE STATISTICS!!!!!!!!! AFRICAN AMERICANS ARE 13% OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! YET, AFRICAN AMERIDCANS COMMIT 50% OF ALL VIOLENT CRIME IN AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! THEREFORE, ONE WOULD EXPECT, WITH DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF AFRICAN AMERICANS, THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE OF AMERICA; THERE WOULD, SUBSEQUENTLY, BE DOUBLE THE RATE OF VIOLENT CRIMES BEING COMMITTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D

I think there’s a difference between just ‘frisking’ someone who seems suspicious and pressing their head down on the hood of a car. If the police was less aggressive then they’d probably have more people defending the Stop-and-Frisk policy instead of fighting to abolish it

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

A very good point. There is so much gray area, and many police officers conduct stop-and-frisk in a professional way.

@rangergxi

4 жыл бұрын

The police citing "not wanting to be frisked" as their reason to believe a person is suspicious doesn't help.

@Dakotaidk

4 жыл бұрын

@@rangergxi that doesn't stand in court

@JTA1961

4 жыл бұрын

6 out of 10 cops take excessive force as a fringe benefit... you know... like speeding. { Whata you gonna do ? ? Call a cop ?? }

@ipsurvivor

3 жыл бұрын

@@Dakotaidk According to Terry v. Ohio a frisk is also a search which implicates the Fourth Amendment.

I've been enjoying your channel Lately Mr beat. Keep up the good work. Who ever wins the 2020 election will you upload a election video?

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you! And yes I plan on making an election of 2020 video.

I really like the way you revealed that Terry and Chilton were black and that Katz was white. Some say that those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it, and this is a prefect example. As we all know, searching the two black men and not the white man as well is VERY """reasonable""" and warrants search and seizure. I look forward to the next Supreme Court Briefs!

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Crazy thing is, I've been teaching this case for years and didn't know until only recently that Terry and Chilton were black.

@bjs301

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat You've been "teaching" this case for years. How is it you never actually researched it?

@bjs301

4 жыл бұрын

Some would say that those who choose to believe some KZread guy with a questionable history of honesty, without looking into things for themselves, are suckers

@kelvinpang438

4 жыл бұрын

@@bjs301 And some would say that trumpists are idiots.

@JivanPal

4 жыл бұрын

@@kelvinpang438, and, you know, the vast majority of the time, they'd be right.

thanks for making these they help a lot w/class your craft is much appreciated

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

You'll flunk if you write down almost anything this guy said. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Supreme Court Briefs are my favorite Mr. Beat videos. Thank you so much for making these.

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

I just appreciate you watching them, and I'm so glad they can help!

Just finished watching all your old Supreme Court Briefs videos and now there's a new one for me! :) Amazing series!

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching!

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat oh my God you did more damage? How much damage have you done? I’m gonna have to take a look at the rest of the things that you’ve done

I know you said this series doesn't get as many views as other videos, but it is one of my favourite types of video you make you do so keep everything up!

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much!

@JustaMomnFamily

Жыл бұрын

I just found this channel and I LOVE being taught something I never knew the story behind it

My favorite series is back! Thanks Mr. Beat!

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Well I guess I have to make more of these then. :D

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Gosh I hope not. This video is all lies. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

These may not do as well as your other videos but oh man are they important. If anyone wants to know about the evolution of our “rights” as citizens this is where to go.

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

It’s incorrect. He’s not doing this other than for video views. This is incorrect data

@kieranrollinson8750

Жыл бұрын

TIME 5:12 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 59% AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!! 24% NEW YORK POPULATION AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT A WAY TO MANIPULATE STATISTICS!!!!!!!!! AFRICAN AMERICANS ARE 13% OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! YET, AFRICAN AMERIDCANS COMMIT 50% OF ALL VIOLENT CRIME IN AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! THEREFORE, ONE WOULD EXPECT, WITH DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF AFRICAN AMERICANS, THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE OF AMERICA; THERE WOULD, SUBSEQUENTLY, BE DOUBLE THE RATE OF VIOLENT CRIMES BEING COMMITTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D

Thanks for doing this video Mr Beat, never knew about this!

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

And you still don't -- this video is completely false at every level and lies at a lot of place. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Mike Bloomberg sees this vid and starts breathing Heavily...

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Freaking Bloomberg. I thought it was funny when Trump criticized Bloomberg for stop-and-frisk, and then a week later is all of sudden for stop-and-frisk again.

@RemixedVoice

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat Welcome to politics 🤣

@krismine99

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat I think it was the hypocrisy of the candidate running for that party and holding that view at the same time

@EPluribusUnumYT

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat The 2 Party System in a nutshell.

Thank you for your video as always :)

It sucks how much stop and frisk is abused

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

I'm sure the justices had no idea how much it would be abused in the following decades.

Great video. I enjoy your editing style. It makes some great consumable history videos. Keep up the good work.

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much! :D

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

I'm an expert on Terry v Ohio -- this was a very disgusting video. This person made things up ALOT -- kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

love the added detail about the vote and reasoning behind the one vote, very important man. Thank you!

Mr. Beat, you are one of my favorite social studies teachers. You have helped me learn a lot over the years I have watched you. Never stop!

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much!

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Rocco -- he creates videos for LIKES and Views -- he starts off by lying and it never stop. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

@kieranrollinson8750

Жыл бұрын

TIME 5:12 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 59% AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!! 24% NEW YORK POPULATION AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT A WAY TO MANIPULATE STATISTICS!!!!!!!!! AFRICAN AMERICANS ARE 13% OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! YET, AFRICAN AMERIDCANS COMMIT 50% OF ALL VIOLENT CRIME IN AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! THEREFORE, ONE WOULD EXPECT, WITH DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF AFRICAN AMERICANS, THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE OF AMERICA; THERE WOULD, SUBSEQUENTLY, BE DOUBLE THE RATE OF VIOLENT CRIMES BEING COMMITTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D

Thank you for the video, i have a paper on this case!! And this information is very helpful!!

4:21 "the decision has unintended consequences" No, I disagree. I think the consequences were extremely intended.

@Montfortracing

3 жыл бұрын

The police were definitely expecting something

My favorite series! Thank you Mr. Beat.

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Thank YOU :)

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Emmerson -- this video is a fabrication. It's not the truth. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

This series it’s how I first came to your channel. Keep them coming

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Will do!

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Oh no-- Not only is this vid inaccurate - it's lies. I'm an expert on ONE THING: Terry v Ohio. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Great video!

John Terry went on to slip and miss a penalty in the 2008 UCL final that costed Chelsea their first Champions League Trophy and handed it to Manchester United. Its a small world.

@drunkchunkfunk6950

Жыл бұрын

💀💀💀

I’m not a fan of stop-and-frisk, but I’m curious on what an alternate solution could be to it since there are situations where people actually look suspicious

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Solution? It seems to me police are creating problems, as stop-and-frisk does NOT reduce crime. The alternative would be to assume everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Things aren't always what they seem, especially when everyone has prejudice.

@Truths_Sayer

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat how can you be sure it doesn't reduces crime without explaining a negative? It's been around since the 60's. I'd bet it does reduce crime. It at least catches bad guys after a crime. Terry stops can happen, before, during and after a crime.

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

@@Truths_Sayer Dude -- you just don't know and this guy's video didn't help with all the lies. I've downloaded it and Ill be coming after him for his lies. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

@kieranrollinson8750

Жыл бұрын

TIME 5:12 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 59% AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!! 24% NEW YORK POPULATION AFRICAN AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT A WAY TO MANIPULATE STATISTICS!!!!!!!!! AFRICAN AMERICANS ARE 13% OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! YET, AFRICAN AMERIDCANS COMMIT 50% OF ALL VIOLENT CRIME IN AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!! THEREFORE, ONE WOULD EXPECT, WITH DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF AFRICAN AMERICANS, THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE OF AMERICA; THERE WOULD, SUBSEQUENTLY, BE DOUBLE THE RATE OF VIOLENT CRIMES BEING COMMITTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D

Thank you!

Stop-and-Frisk seems like an infringement of citizen rights. Interesting food for thought. I like your "Supreme Court Briefs" videos!

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

And yet, it's so common these days. Glad you like the series. :D

@sigmaballsnetwork

4 жыл бұрын

If it came out a minute ago how did you watch it 4 days ago

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

@@sigmaballsnetwork She's a Patreon supporter. They get early access to videos.

@shyam14111986

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat How is the comment from G Guerrard 4 days old when the video was uploaded just a few hours ago?

@johanbendiksen7051

4 жыл бұрын

@@shyam14111986 yeah what

Thank you

Love your channel !

Just had my truck seized and they are saying its set for forfeiture. Even though the fines are way less than the value of the truck. They state it was involved in the crime even though it wasn't. 7 other cases similar they did not take the vehicle but they did with mine because it is paid for. Doesn't the 8th Amendment protect me from this type of government theft?

“McFadden’s concern for his own safety” McFadden went and confronted them.

@monkberrymoon4042

2 жыл бұрын

I've been a lawyer for, like, 30 years, and I've never heard anyone make this argument against Terry before. You really think that a policeman that investigates a suspicious situation is, well, asking for trouble? I mean, if you believe that police shouldn't exist, I guess that makes sense. But as long as we have them, don't you think they should be allowed to "confront" people that potentially doing something criminal?

Wow, so relevant with regards to the events that happened after George Floyd. Even without his brutal death, this sort of thing is incredibly touchy to people who have that sort of thing happen to them more often than others. Small wonder they got so mad after George Floyd was killed

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

It still happens every day. Thanks goodness for cell phones to capture it now.

@SiVlog1989

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat the most significant time prior to today, where there was so much pushback after something divisive, as far as I can tell, was during 1968. The Tet Offensive during Vietnam rocked both the population (leading to people taking to the streets) and the Administration of Lyndon Johnson (people protested outside the White House chanting "hey, hey LBJ, How many kids [did] you kill today?"), ultimately leading him to not seek re-election. But even after that of course, there were still a huge amount of division, protests and pushback, particularly during the Democratic convention in Chicago (as mentioned in your superb series on Presidential Elections in US history Matt :)) with confrontations between the police and the protestors. It's certainly up there with the 2000 and 2016 campaigns in terms of how divided people seemed to be (of course, they're also the two most recent times the winner of the election lost the popular vote)

@edwardmiessner6502

3 жыл бұрын

It's also very touchy to people to whom the Terry frisk was done improperly, like for example, the officer feels your wallet and he knows it's a wallet and picks your pocket anyway. (Brownback v King)

@johnthompson2965

Ай бұрын

What does the death of George Floyd have to do with it?

@SiVlog1989

Ай бұрын

@johnthompson2965 kneeling directly on the neck of someone who was already restrained to the point where the person under arrest dies? That's not a valid excuse for a police officer to use the "Reasonably Scared Cop" Rule. What threat can someone already cuffed and on the ground pose to a police officer? That's when the police can be judged (by the general public at least) to go from Objective Reasonableness to Subjective Reasonableness, in other words, police, like the one who murdered George Floyd in May 2020 and other black people who died in Police Custody, can be seemed to use that ruling as an excuse for excessive force

President During this time: Lyndon B. Johnson Chief Justice: Earl Warren Argued December 12, 1967 Decided June 10, 1968 Case Duration: 181 Days Decision: 8-1 in favor of Ohio

One of the worst Supreme Court decisions

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

It definitely had many, MANY unintended consequences.

@cobracommander9138

2 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat Incarceration rates skyrocketed it after Terry v. Ohio. Police brutality i'm sure also skyrocketed.

Awesome content. I wish I had learned a quarter of what your sharing with us in school.

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

DO NOT SHARE THIS IN SCHOOL!! OMFG -- he made shit up bro. It's all lies. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

I am a new subscriber. Love your videos! First saw you from “the beat goes on”

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

You should Unsubscribe to these lies. My career is to Overturn Terry v Ohio-- compare his lies to the truth: Very sad -- this video is lies and fabrications. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

These videos might not be as popular, but they're extremely important to produce. Thank you for continuing to release solid content, especially related to hot topics like the powers of the police. I, for one, love Supreme Court Briefs

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Well then learn it correctly. This video is pure lies. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

The supreme court turned the US into a police state with this one. They weaseld around the 4th amendments seizure by creating "detainment" where you are not technically being arrested but you are not free to leave while the police do an unconstitutional search, lie to you and threaten you trying to squeeze probable cause out of you in the name of "officer safety", which was not even an issue in this case but was just pulled out of some judges ass to justify trashing our rights. My channel has a video that takes a comprehensive look at how the supreme court re-defined words and added non-issues to justify this. I like to think that the supreme court justices that voted for this are in the lower levels of hell being sodomized repeatedly by large hell hounds while they are forced to watch the deaths and brutal beatings of innocent people by police that have happened because of their ruling which, when you listen carefully to them, was motivated by racism.

It's super helpful thanks for your effort

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

No -- Un-learn the lies. He lied the whole video. He created this for views and likes. He's a fraud, my friend. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

I think it's okay for the police to conduct a stop-and-frisk if they have a reasonable suspicious that a crime is to imminently committed. So imminent that a warrant could not be requested in time

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

That sounds ok to me most of the time, but the problem is there is a slippery slope, and "reasonably suspicious" is fairly subjective.

@RemixedVoice

4 жыл бұрын

I'd like to agree with you in principle, but the amount of times cops catch an imminent crime before it happens without a warrant is incredibly rare lol

@Truths_Sayer

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat a slippery slope yes but eliminating it would be backwards. How about cops on the way to a serious domestic assault or another serious crime and someone is running away? Shouldn't they be stopped? The list goes on and on. I think courts after the fact determining what is reasonable is really the best solution on a case by case basis.

@Bram06

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat Can't the court rule on that after the fact? Whether it was reasonable?

@georgejpg

4 жыл бұрын

@@Truths_Sayer Stop and frisk is COMPLETELY backwards. It doesn't make anyone safer and is used as a tool to strike fear into minority communities. You shouldn't need to wait for police to abuse their power to act on it (Ignoring the fact that the police abuse their power with no consequences constantly)

Gotta agree with the court here.

I love these Supreme Court briefs!!! 👏👏

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

He lied the entire thing. None of this is accurate or even close to the truth. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

great video

It needs to come back in NYC.

Excellent police work

Thank you Terri for making this become such a controversy. I only like this when it is used LIKE IT WAS INTENDED NOT ABUSED!!

Will and or when will the Supreme Court rehearsal Terry Vs Ohio..??

You forgot the most important part: The police have a limited amount of time and scope to hold someone under reasonable suspicion. In Terry's case, had he not been carrying a weapon, the detective would have - say - 20 minutes at most. If his suspicions were dispelled, he would have to let the men go. If during those 20 minutes, he finds probable cause to believe that the men were conspiring to commit a robbery, the detective could escalate the Terry stop to an arrest. Otherwise, the detective has to let the men go; however, the detective may continue the investigation and - if he then develops probable cause against the men - he may obtain an arrest warrant.

@TheJingles007

2 жыл бұрын

Shh. That won't make as good of a video because then he can't claim racism as well

I didn't realize the supreme court briefs didn't do as well as the other videos. I think they are some of the most interesting ones

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Sure they are -- when you make up lies for it to be differ than reality... compare his lies to the true Terry v Ohio saga that plagues America today: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Justice Douglas was way ahead of his time.

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

I think him more and more the more I learn about him.

Basically the court skipped over the 4th amendment

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Yes -- and he lied about the case. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

> pat down all 3 suspects >> feels guns on two of them >>>reaches in to the pockets of the men with guns Where is the racism there?

@rrchicken117

19 күн бұрын

K Jones lol Imagine this you're walking down the street and you're stopped due to the color of your skin. Not "suspicion".

Not sure if you're still doing this series or are taking suggestions from KZread comments, but you think you could do a video on Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia?

Ur actually carrying my history grade rn tysm

Mr Beat I have spent the afternoon trying to determine how my representative in the US house of representatives voted on a measure voted July 1,2020 on a 45-11 vote to continue to keep troops in Afghanistan I have looked on the Congressional Record website and it has not been helpful perhaps you could teach your viewers how to navigate this site and discover how their representative voted on particular measures? I think quite a few citizens need this refresher.

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Not THIS -- these are lies bro. He made this shit up. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Overturn Terry V Ohio

This is a complicated issue and I don't know a lot, but what I do know is that Detective McFadden had probable cause in that particular instance

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Great work! Terry is such an interesting case. I think we might cover Terry someday in the future. The political implications of the Majority opinion are jarring.

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

If you do; disregard this entire video. This man lied and made things up. He is really-- he did a disservice to you. I'm an expert on Terry -- EDU for real - not some fraud like this guy... kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Please do a "worst supreme court decisions" video

John Terry, like the Chelsea legend 😂

At first I thought this was a comparison video and was curious where Terry was lol I agree with the dissenting vote

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah-=-- This guy made things up -- bad job-- Mr Beat would be fired --- he lied, a lot. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

You better have good reasonable articulable suspicion that I've committed a crime or are about to commit a crime or your not getting any info from me. See you in court for your lawsuit.

Seems like someone saw this ruling and thought they could use it to fuel their prisons yikes

you should do a video reviewing hamilton, if you can. because i, as a huge history nerd and theatre nerd was not a fan because of the historical inaccuracies and i'd love to see your opinion as well!!

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Let's hope he moves on from things that others are experts on. If you hate historical inaccuracies - you're gonna hate finding out this video is pure lies. Compare the truth. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

What ups Mr beat July 2020 and can give a ❤️

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Hey

@littlekid8343

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Dude

Do not discontinue SCB!!

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

I'll keep making them, though I've slowed down making them lately.

Didn’t the court also say the detained suspects must also be believed to be armed and dangerous prior to being frisked.

The government can not give the government permission to ignore the constitution so government can government..

I don't think the YT algorithm understands the Ohio meme 💀

kinda silly to say the police has more authority than a magistrate to execute searches, when a police officer can personally observe crimes and magistrates can't, and magistrates' jobs involves lots of subjectivity in decisionmaking as well.

Just out of curiosity, Mr. Beat, what is your next country comparison video gonna be on?

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

I'm seriously considering Australia and New Zealand.

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Compare the truth to Mr Beats lies. He made this whole video up. It's really sad and highly likely I sue him. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Damn william douglas worded that perfectly

Wow, I am actually watching a video that talks about an incident on Halloween, on Halloween.

Supreme Court briefs made me laugh.

When you can, you should do Planned Parenthood v Casey! It’s a pretty important one helping explain reproductive rights. Love your series!

@Snow-ik7ku

3 жыл бұрын

He made it

Never knew this happens and it’s in my hometown

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

It did NOT happen like this ... here's how it happened. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Hello i have a similiar issue where i was at a specific location upon leaveing the establishment i was harrased stop by an officer where he did a stop and frisk tempor detaining me asking me questions where i refused to in a disrespectful manner and resistid w out violence under no circiumstances i was involded in a crime neither about to comit one he later stated there were looking for a subject armed with a rifle matching my description is this totally legal or illegal i have trial next month and im lookong to have my attroney drop these charges againestme

The NYPD took it a step too far with their "stop and kiss" program imo

It’s crazy how these seemingly good decisions get manipulated to benefit a minority. I love the Supreme Court Briefs series! Thank you!

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

oh that's so sad -- this video he produced is garbage... he lied. He lies about a ton of things... compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Chille needs to school you. It’s coming…

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks -- look at ALLL these people he LIED TO for Views and Likes. What a POS.

Man, interesting stuff Mr. Beat. Didn't think that the stop-and-frisk procedure would be racist. I wonder would the detective had been around to see what's going on after what's happening in recent events.

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

I agree, the implications were much bigger than any of them could ever imagine.

@zach7193

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat I couldn't agree more.

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

Zachariah -- Mr. Beat is just like William Archibald Dunnin and the Sisters of the Confederacy. This video is completely wrong-- made up garbage. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

1:53 There *"was"* this law called the exclusionary rule.

Your supreme court videos are by far my favorite videos you make.

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

I'm so sorry to read this -- he made it up. It's not true. Terry v Ohio is my career. Sad he misled and lied to so many people Compare the truth to his lies: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Wickard v. Filburn next please

The SCOTUS ruled that NY's stop and frisk program was illegal under the 4th Amendment. NY said they were going to continue doing it anyway (or at least until they found another way of doing it).

In the words of nute gunray, Is that legal?

@iammrbeat

4 жыл бұрын

Oh Nute.

@CommanderCodyCC

4 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat 😂 nice one

@robertwilliams4682

4 жыл бұрын

"I will make it legal"

I remember "Stop and Frisk" being braught up during the Democrate debates in 2019. Michael Blumberg was the one being questioned about the practice.

And 2 years later? Enjoy the crime wave NYC 👍🏼😁

And that's how Terry versus Ohio violates the 4th amendment because it changes persons in the 4th amendment to officer safety and it changes probable cause to reasonable articulate suspicion which violates the Fourth amendment just because our officer is suspicious of you do not give him the right to put his hands on you until you committed a crime or violated some kind of penal code like the Fourth amendment says it's the right of the people to be secure in their person's papers houses in effect against unreasonable searches and seizures a warrant shall not be issued but only upon probable cause particularly describing the place to be searched and the things to be seen supported by all the affirmation now where does it say in the 4th amendment that a cop has the right to walk up to you because he's suspicious of you and start touching you like he's sexually assaulting you when all he has is suspicion of you because that's what they're doing they can use that indiscriminately against anybody that that police officer don't like the way that he looks the way that he or she walks that's not specifics on how reasonable suspicion can be used they got to be actual facts for Blue line terrace to sexually assault you because that is unwanted touching by a complete stranger and you don't know this complete stranger mental state

What it is the number of homicides by race in New York City if you want to prove a point?

Suggestion for supreme court brief: Santa Clara County vs SPR company (1886) the case that established corporate personhood

@DeleteLawz1984

2 жыл бұрын

He wouldn't know it. He doesn't understand history or conceptual analysis. Compare the truth to the bullshit video he made up. I'm an expert and my career is Terry v Ohio. Compare: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pnhr3KyTnbvWhZs.html

Define "reasonable suspicion".

@krazysniper1018

Жыл бұрын

Reasonable suspicion is a reasonable, articuable suspicion that a crime has been committed or is about to be committed. The "reasonable" part of it is supposed to be based on experience in law enforcement. Would another officer who is objective also be suspicious of the situation? If so, the suspicion is reasonable. The articuable factor is also very important. It is extremely important that an officer can articulate why they believe the individual or situation to be suspicious. In short, if an officer is going to stop someone based on reasonable suspicion, they better be able to explain to a judge or attorney why they stopped them.

question for viewers do u think the supreme court verdict would be different today?