How many Rebounds would Bill and Wilt get in the modern game, and how many Rebounds would modern bigs get in the 60s?? NOTE: If it sounds like I recorded this video in a trash can, that's because I'm out of town, and this hotel room isn't very sound proof. lol. The audio should be back to normal on the next video.

@MikeTheNBAGuy

2 жыл бұрын

14-15, just like the other best rebounders in the current NBA

@calmtbi7051

2 жыл бұрын

I would still think 15-20

@HoopAndRoll

2 жыл бұрын

I think they'd get 14-19 in their prime depends on their minutes played and teammates

@sportswikipedia5739

2 жыл бұрын

I say 12-16 rebs. The sound was good, I could still hear and understand you just fine

@idk13539

2 жыл бұрын

wilt 15 bill 17

1:04 The only other player from the modern NBA who comes to mind for me is Charles Barkley vs the Suns in 1996. Barkley outrebounded the entire Suns team by grabbing 33 total rebounds.

@juicethreetwo

2 жыл бұрын

Sir Charles stands six foot four inches.

@Kingkam_77

2 жыл бұрын

@@juicethreetwo at least he played in a decent era

@smokeyjoe795

2 жыл бұрын

Moses Malone is the greatest rebounder of all time. It doesn't matter what era you plug him into, he will dominate the offensive glass. Moses used power, quickness, and desire for the ball. He was a quick leaper.

@gm2407

Жыл бұрын

I think Kevin Love got 30 in a game once.

A lot of people tend to criticize bill and wilt cause they versed “plumbers”. THESE TWO WERE DEMI GODS. Wilt’s track and field record just shows… If Bill and Wilt had the modern technology of today’s athletes, it’s over.. 🐐🔥🐐

@gamble777888

2 жыл бұрын

Yup, if anything older players would be even better today. Of course that balances out somewhat as there is more competition today for sure. Still it's silly and near impossible to make those comparisons. But to take anything away from players back in that era is certainly criminal.

@TheKyubiisaan

2 жыл бұрын

I always said, it doesn’t matter if they’re plumbers. If 3 7 footers are hacking you on every play, it’s tough competition regardless. Who gives a fuck if it’s Shawn Bradley or Hakeem Olajuwon? An elbow to the mouth still hurts.

@gamble777888

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheKyubiisaan That's another point, back then the game was BRUTAL, anyone who could put up with that type of punishment is legit. A lot of today's stars would have been brokoen by the way the game was back then.

@humbledragger6411

2 жыл бұрын

Not to mention bill was a world class Olympic athlete as well for like high jumping or something like that I believe

@duolingosbabycousin5834

2 жыл бұрын

Also the average height back then was 6’6 and idk about you but I’ve never seen a 6’6 plumber

Not sure if you've reached out to ESPN or Fox Sports, or if they've reached out to you, but your videos are top notch. Good luck on your future ventures and great content. 👍🏾

@nessdagoat

2 жыл бұрын

I agree but I think companies partnering with NBA KZreadrs like Jonny is the next wave anyway

@GarkKahn

2 жыл бұрын

What's a fox sports anyway?

@denizakin5645

2 жыл бұрын

Especially with nba 75 this year his content would be great

@hor7910

2 жыл бұрын

@@GarkKahn A sports channel owned by FOX Entertainment.

@vloneming

2 жыл бұрын

underrated comment

That is one of the most well written video in basketball I saw. Not only relying only on stats, but putting those in perspective in their era and confronting them with further and modern eras. It was very informative and interesting. It showed how much Bill and Wilt were so dominant and why they finally have a case for being the Greatest Basketball player of All Time.

@javigar133

2 жыл бұрын

Great comment

It's always fun to learn about Chamberlain and Russell...

@Amick44

2 жыл бұрын

The best!

While the game was different then, both Wilt and Russell combined extreme athleticism with extreme skill. Wilt was 7'2" (shoes on like all rookies from '73 on), powerful, could run like a deer, and could jump out the gym. Russell was an even better jumper than Wilt, was more mobile than Wilt, and was quick as a cat. Both players also had great timing so they maximized their athleticism. As somebody who has watched pro hoop since the '60s, I haven't seen a better rebounder than either since and if they played today, Wilt and Russell would be the best rebounders in the NBA.

@moosezk9681

2 жыл бұрын

Eaaaasy, I seen the footage, dudes in the 60s that were guards were not good rebounders lol

@jingqi9106

2 жыл бұрын

@@moosezk9681 Guards? Lol First of all we're talking about centers but if you want to talk guards, Oscar Robertson is one of the greatest rebounding guards ever. Also, Jerry West was a good rebounder and there were others too. lol

@christiandiscernment1697

2 жыл бұрын

Good points. Russ was a better high-jumper, Wilt had a higher vertical. Both unique and amazing athletes. Got to see Wilt with the Globe Trotters and met him in the 76er years. I believe he is the greatest combination of size, speed, strength and athleticism in human history.

@jasonturner6459

2 жыл бұрын

@@moosezk9681 Maybe so but they also weren't shooting 3 all the time and giving up long rebounds and centers could camp around the paint.

@donshults7772

2 жыл бұрын

You have no evidence they weren't shooting threes. Though it seems logical that the number of FGA belong 23' would be less, players like Sam Jones, Hondo, West, Maravich were all taking those shots.

Yeah there was a lot of rebounds but you still gotta grab 'em

@ybkid6513

2 жыл бұрын

U really thought u did something with this😂

@cashmoneysniper4166

2 жыл бұрын

@@ybkid6513 Wdym? Am I not right?

@sorinnoctis652

2 жыл бұрын

@@ybkid6513 well yeah. bill and wilt had to grab em over their competition? you good?

@ybkid6513

2 жыл бұрын

@@sorinnoctis652 and??

@sorinnoctis652

2 жыл бұрын

@@ybkid6513 for someone who tried to be clever, you sure are slow lmao.

Another impact on the boards of the increased 3pt attempts is that offensive rebounds for the past several seasons have been hitting all-time lows. Back in the 70s, it hovered around 15 per game. But in recent years, it began dipping below 10. Of course, that also resulted in defensive rebounds reaching all-time highs.

The game was different then, higher pace, less off ball movement, more misses.

@bulletproofbasketball7739

2 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't say there was less ball movement, have you seen some teams play today? ISO, ISO, ISO. Higher pace, more misses is the main reason, with Wilt and Bill being very athletic and talented

@DgSezn

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, today it’s not just iso every time, and you wouldn’t play 45+ minutes a game for a whole season

@Kingkam_77

2 жыл бұрын

I’d say more ball movement because nobody could dribble, it was just pass and shoot… and miss most of the time.

If this video isn’t one of the most enlightening NBA compare and contrast between todays game and the game 60 years ago, then I don’t know what is!! This is absolutely brilliantly done and a gem to say the least! Appreciate how respectful you are towards all the greats and their numbers too!

I feel like raw stats like RPG and PPG are poor indicators of actual performance and per 100 stats should be used for comparison, that would minimize the elements that create noise in these stats across stats such as pace. Also, how the hell did the narrative that NBA players were shorter in the 60s start. It may have been somewhat true in Mikan's time, but Wilt and Bill were really athletic and freaks of nature when it came to strength for big men so were able to outrebound clumsier, weaker big men. I hadn't thought about the field goal percentage. Safe to say that offensive boards from second and third attempt rebounds were much higher.

@tyjohnson3111

2 жыл бұрын

Per 100 isn’t an exact “science” and actually creates more distortion with assumptions on player’s stats that purposely ignores nuisance & context.

@bbgod2525

2 жыл бұрын

It started because NBA players were shorter in the 60s

@bwink23

2 жыл бұрын

Raw stats are terrible for sure. That's why this video was made. More possessions, more missed shots, more time on the floor = more rebounding opportunities. This is not rocket science.

@tyjohnson3111

2 жыл бұрын

@@bwink23 raw stats with no context are terrible. Per 100, Per 75, Per 36, Per 48-aren’t that much better as raw stats.

@JAWrightonline

2 жыл бұрын

@@bwink23 According to PER, James Harden was a "better" than Kareem and Hakeem...GTFOH!!!

Idk how you haven't blown yet your vids are awesome keep it up 👍🏿

Finally the video to give context to the numbers! Great vid!

Nice analysis. You managed to hit every point I could think of, plus

Wilt would lead the league in rebounding today,just pluck him right out of the 60s converses and all and he would do it easily and if he heard Andre Drummond call himself the best rebounder ever Wilt would set the record against him.Thats who Chamberlain was it's no coincidence that his regular season rebounding record and his playoff rebounding record came against Bill Russell also 7 (almost half) of his 40 rebound games came against Russell and that he averaged 5 more rebounds head to head. The guy was blocking Kareem's sky hook at its Apex when he was old on one good leg and 310 pounds. The man was simply the greatest and it gets a little tiring to see people try to negate his stats but no one else's.Should we adjust LeBrons' scoring because of defensive 3 seconds, restricted zone and no hand checking or his assists because players can dribble before they take the shot. What would Chamberlain rebound in today's game where many teams don't even try for an offensive rebound probably around 22.

@nicholasschroeder3678

2 жыл бұрын

Truth

@warkunitale

2 жыл бұрын

You're denying the facts about the 60's Nba basketball and you complain that younglings don't align their views on yours , we know that Wilt is an athletic phenom , it's pretty obvious but no way he would put up the ridiculous numbers there was back then , it will lower regardless of what you believe

@johncrom1400

2 жыл бұрын

@@warkunitale I look at it more as available energy to expend,we both know that he had the greatest stamina in the game.So if he plays at a slower pace than it follows that he would have more energy for rebounding. In the 1967 playoffs against the Celtics and Bill Russell he grabbed an average of 32 rebounds per game on his triple double average of 21 pts,32 rebounds and 10 assists,he out rebounded Russell by nearly 9 and had almost half of his team average 65 rebounds.What I am saying is if he put his mind to rebounding at least 22 per game he would have the skill, athleticism, intelligence,and stamina to do so.

@warkunitale

2 жыл бұрын

@@johncrom1400 with less possessions and way less missed shots on average in the league plus the fact that centers can't sit in the paint as long as they could in the 60's , I doubt he would average the same amount of rebounds , he will most likely still be the best rebounder during several seasons but 20 plus rebounds will not happen as frequently , and a lower pace don't save you stamina , you still has to use energy on defense for longer , it won't change much for Wilt with his stamina anyway but putting his mind into it won't maintain the same amount he had then all of his career .

This a great video topic. I’d love to see more videos about the strengths and weaknesses of the different eras. Everyone is so obsessed with the goat debate but the obvious caveat to that discussion is that the era must be taken into consideration. Problem is most of us do not have a real understanding of the different eras because we weren’t able to experience them first hand. Info like this helps to make the conversation more intelligent.

@abubakrsalim9622

2 жыл бұрын

Actually, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar made this same observation when questioned about goat status that you only can voice an opinion about eras when pressed if he was the goat his answer, I think I'm in the conversation which made me smile.

This is such a great explanation. Thank you for this!

@jonnyarnett

2 жыл бұрын

You're welcome! Thank you for watching!

by far my favorite video you have done. I found your channel during the pandemic and loved the intricacies of your analyses. I hated listening to the "box score" youtubers who gave little to no analysis. I struggled wondering why on earth did people average 20 rebounds back then, and u literally explained it for me perfectly. Your in depth exploration of the nuances of basketball is amazing, and please keep up the great content!

As always great work and great video from Johnny.

Your content is the best about NBA I've ever seen on KZread bro, keep going!

Dude your content and research is on point!! I love this channel. I have 4 basketball analysis channels I watch and yours is number 1!!! And loooooove the intro!! It’s the first thing that caught my attention when I found this channel 2yrs ago. Respect!!

Young Kareem vs old Wilt. Career overlap Kareem 1969 - 14.5 reb.. Wilt 1969 - 18.4 reb Kareem 1970 - 16.0 reb.. Wilt 1970 - 18.2 reb Kareem 1971 - 16.6 reb (NBA MVP, Finals MVP).. Wilt 1971 - 19.2 reb Kareem 1972 - 16.1 reb (NBA MVP).. Wilt- 18.6 reb (Finals MVP)

Excellent vid! I would've loved to hear the pace-adjusted numbers and rebound percentage comparisons between eras!

Very good video! Excellent analysis!

This makes so much sense. Thanks for enlightening me sir

great video as always!

great video, presentation and research, thanks

Great breakdown Jonny. Educational and entertaining! Nice!

This video is very important and necessary to basketball fans.

Every time I watch your videos I learn something new. That’s why I love your channel

@jonnyarnett

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comment! That’s honestly my goal when writing a script, so I’m happy to hear it’s having an effect :) Thanks again

@Yes_Sir420

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonnyarnett 🐐

Man Jonny ESPN or NBA tv needs to give you a segment on their channel

This might be your best video, what a phenomenal breakdown. I'd love to see more eras broken down in this way. I feel it could really help the discourse around the different eras. For example, could a "relative value" of an assist be created based on pace of play, efficiency, etc?

You have the best overall NBA content on KZread hands down. Not sure if I said something before but just wanted to comment. I love this game, every single era.

I remember watching an old highlight reel film of basketball in the 60's and it was horrendously bad! 😅 The amount of layups missed was hilarious and you could see big men gobble up rebounds like it was nothing because on most possessions guards and wings where already at the other end once the shot was up in the air. I'd say in todays game, OG Centers would average around 15 boards a game with the proliferation of guards trying to pad their stats with rebounds. But I'm not sure todays bigs would be as successful because one thing lacking today that happened a lot back then, is good box outs.

@handlebucket6285

2 жыл бұрын

I always hear this claim and never find evidence. What game are you even talking about?

@KaineTremaine

2 жыл бұрын

These guys today aren't boxing out half as much as they should.

@bwink23

2 жыл бұрын

I have to agree. From what I have seen, it's like the other positions on the floor had an understanding that the bigs are going to be the sole proprietors of rebounds lol. I know, but but Elgin Baylor, Robertson, West!! Elgin actively said he was going to invade their turf. Oscar was also playing near 45 minutes a game. Their rebounds are inflated as well from all the opportunities. But yeah, I agree the offensive schemes of that day allowed for more camping in the paint for boards.

@BlessedAreTheCheesemakers

2 жыл бұрын

20 rebounds per game in the 60s is like 11 or 12 per game today

@icemike1

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah they'd say what's a box out

This is a certified hood classics

About the undersized part, the weight is the difference in the 2010s is 225lbs. In 1961-1970, the average weight is 202lbs. In basketball, that’s a significant difference.

@jonnyarnett

2 жыл бұрын

It definitely is. The point is addressing the misconception about height, but yes, modern athletes do have a significant advantage in muscle mass

From 1950 to 1976, players staying on the court at least 42 minutes happened all the time... It's happened 85 times in fact. Shortly after the mergers coaches stopped using their star players because the game changed a lot after the NBA-ABA merger. After 1976, players gathering 42 minutes per game became a rare jewel. Every NBA star saw their minutes dipped after the merger! Great video as always.

Great video, you should do one on Russell and Wilt’s shot blocking

@bulletproofbasketball7739

2 жыл бұрын

But blocks were recording back then?

If it’s a Jonny Arnett video, I like the video right away.

*The fact that they dominated the boards against players close to there size makes it even more incredible* 👏👏👏👏👏👏 I think in today's game Wilt would average somewhere around 15-18RPG and Russell around 12RPG or maybe even lower because of his size.

@pioplu4803

2 жыл бұрын

he was 6'10 bare foot😭 and 240 at his heaviest...he was one of the most athletic players of all time, if Dennis could average 18 bill could average 22...they have similar rebounding iqs but bill was bigger, faster and jumped higher...maybe even stronger...bill also hounded for the ball similar to Dennis!!!

@rickyrichreacts9667

2 жыл бұрын

@@pioplu4803 agreed I just can't see Russell dominate today like he did when he played. Players are way more athletic. He'd have no advantage. And to be fair Bill was only around 6'8 or 6'9

@corey2232

2 жыл бұрын

Charles Barkley dominated the boards being a lot shorter than many Centers. Russell at 6'10+ with shoes on would certainly be able to put up huge rebound numbers with his athleticism & stamina (just ability to stay on the court).

jonny with another great vid

I'd say in today's game they'd be around that 15 to 18 range for rebounds. Also I have to say you have some of the best NBA content out there and I'm not just talking about KZread! You do such an excellent job of breaking down the why's and how's and you go right after the myths placed on the time, team or player(s). You leave no stone unturned!

I think they'd get 14-19 in their prime depends on their minutes played and teammates

@mprattyh3

2 жыл бұрын

That's, probably, about accurate

@reimixo

2 жыл бұрын

They would play 48mpg... If they were doing it back then with Faster Pace.... Drummond gets 14-15rpg... Wilt would get 20+...7'2" stronger than shaq as athletic as Jordan...

@DgSezn

2 жыл бұрын

@@reimixo they wouldn’t play 48 minutes a game, players like Giannis play around 30 minutes a game because they are blowing out teams when they’re on the court

@javigar133

2 жыл бұрын

Based on what?

Dude! Congrats on 125k! been here since the barkley better then you think video. Deserve the subs, your vids have only got more interesting

@jonnyarnett

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks JP! You’ve been here a while! Means a lot that you’ve stuck around this long 👍

I don’t know if it’s just me or not, but rebounding seems like a stat that matters less and less in today’s NBA.

@cjwarrior16

2 жыл бұрын

the opposite is true if you ask me. Less is more

@donshults7772

2 жыл бұрын

Rebounding is always important. Basketball is an alternate possession game. The more rebounds you get, the more scoring opportunities your team gets and fewer your opponent gets

@hijisfriend9030

2 жыл бұрын

Actually No. With 3s becomes more staple. Rebounding becomes really important

@mokushmasmo6009

2 жыл бұрын

All stats are meaningless without context

Great vid.

Nowadays Wilt and Bill would average around 20 in their primes and around 18 for their careers, they are still the 2 most athletic centers the NBA has ever seen by far and 2 of the 5 most athletic players ever, add a great height (about 2 inches over the average for Bill and 5 for Wilt due to modern shoes adding 1.5-2 inches) and extremely long arms with very big hands and they would dominate the interior easily. Also a slower pace give them a better chance at being under each basket for every rebound (it was harder in the 60s despite their speed because the game was that fast) and having less possessions means more energy per possession so they would have more energy to fight for every rebound. Guys like Pettit, Thurmond, Lucas, Bellamy or Baylor would average around 16-18 in their primes and around 14-16 for their careers. We also have to really take into consideration that most these guys were as obsessed with rebounding as Rodman (Jerry Lucas' nickname was The Computer because he always studied how the ball bounced off the rim when other players shot and learned were to go when a player shot to get the rebound) because they understood that on defense the possession is not over until you get the rebound and on offense more rebounds means more shots and hence more points. And modern centers would get more rebounds obviously, but safe for Dwight, Drummond, maybe Capela and apparently Jokic no one would get past 15 for more than a couple seasons because I don't see them having rebound as a priority, plus if they played against the 60s center many would have a height and athleticism disadvantage, as centers back then were more focused than modern centers in the physical part of the game, and modern players are more focused on things like 3pt shooting or face up scoring. It is more about attitude than it is era or height, just watch the best "modern" rebounder, Rodman (more video and more accessible), it was all about that hunger for the ball and not his height, weight, athleticism or even competition.

@bwink23

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah.....uhhhh....no....not in today's game.

@pablogonzalo3330

2 жыл бұрын

@@bwink23 wow, awesome argument, and yes, smaller centers and mostly smaller powerforwards plus less possessions so they can use more energy per possession and have a way better chance of fighting for a higher % of rebounds plus their waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay bigger hunger for rebounds would give them a great advantage and ge them to the numbers I mentioned, just watch what Rodman did in a slower era, being smaller, and competing against much bigger centers and powerforwards, if you think they wouldn't get the numbers i mentioned you are pretty uneducated on 60s players or very dellusional

@HT-sm9dm

2 жыл бұрын

@@bwink23 uhhhhhh Nikola Jokic won MVP last year. Yeah uhhhhh yeahhhhh that happened. NIKOLA JOKIC 1 MVP in 2020s. SHAQUILLE O’NEAL 0 MVPs in 1990s. 😩😂😂😂✌🏽🤦‍♂️

@bwink23

2 жыл бұрын

@@HT-sm9dm uhhhh yeeeaahh.... irrelevant, no point uhhh yeah .

@HT-sm9dm

2 жыл бұрын

@@bwink23 lmao no it’s not irrelevant. It’s actually the exact opposite of that. It’s literally the definition of relevant in this case.

Very nice video!

I'm actually doing a write up on Wilt Chamberlain and what he'd average in the modern game, as well as the more recent past during the 1990's. I chose three different years of Wilt's career; 61/62 offensive peak at age 25, 66/67 Wilt as post distributer, and 71/72 Wilt post knee injury and working as the best defensive force in the game. There was a lot of effort put into the translation of different eras pace and style of play, as well as statistical trends that encompass the center position across time. If you'd like the math behind this I can provide it, and will do so in the eventual finished article. Anyway, here it is: 1961/1962, 25 year old Wilt if he played in: 2020/2021 at 36 minutes per game: 35.4 PPG 64.06 TS% 14.49/23.22 FG, 62.4% 6.42/10.47 FT, 61.3% 16.09 RPG (24.22 TRB%) 1.7 APG 4.45 BPG The 1990’s at 40 minutes per game: 34.17 PPG 59.55 TS% 13.91/24.12 FG, 57.6% 6.36/10.38 FT, 61.3% 15.21 RPG (22.46 TRB% ) 1.7 APG 5.86 BPG (If following same career arc as previous shot blocking greats) Wilt’s raw stats from 1961/1962: 48.5 MPG 50.4 PPG 53.6 TS% 20.0/39.5 FG, 50.6% 10.4/17.0 FT, 61.3% 25.7 RPG (17.65 TRB%, 1st in league, the rest of top five averaged 15.05 TRB%) 2.4 APG 13.66 BPG (based on 3 games recorded by Harvey Pollack, averaging 49.67 MPG) --------------------------------------------------- 1966/1967, 30 year old Wilt, if he played in: 2020/2021 at 36 minutes per game: 20.7 PPG 73.90 TS% 8.58/10.48 FG, 81.9% 3.51/7.97 FT, 44.1% 16.38 RPG (24.65 TRB%) 6.53 APG 4.06 BPG The 1990’s at 40 minutes per game: 20.01 PPG 68.90 TS% 8.18/10.88 FG, 75.189% 3.65/8.27 FTA, 44.1% 15.47 RPG (22.85 TRB% ) 6.5 APG 5.37 BPG (if following same career arc) Wilt’s raw stats from 1966/1967: 45.5 MPG 24.1 PPG 63.7 TS% 9.7/14.2 FG, 68.3% 4.8/10.8 FT, 44.1% 24.2 RPG (18.64 TRB%, 1st again, with the rest of top five averaging 16.07 TRB%) 7.8 APG 9.33 BPG (based on 9 games recorded by Pollack, averaging 45.67 MPG) --------------------------------------------------- 1971/1972, 35 year old Wilt if he played in: 2020/2021 at 32 minutes per game: 11.78 PPG 69.212 TS% 5.03/6.73 FGA, 74.77% 1.72/4.08 FTA, 42.20% 13.32 RPG (22.60 TRB% = average of 3rd place in era of three ball 16/17 -20/21) 3.16 APG 2.93 BPG The 1990’s at 36 minutes per game: 11.54 PPG 64.3962 TS% 4.87/7.07 FGA, 68.79% 1.81/4.29 FTA, 42.20% 12.08 RPG (20.31 TRB% = the average of 1990’s 3rd place averages) 3.15 APG 3.94 BPG Wilt’s raw stats for 1971/1972: 42.3 Minutes per game 14.8 PPG 61.0 TS% 6.0/9.3 FG, 64.9% 2.7/6.4 FT, 42.2% 19.2 RPG (20.08 TRB%, 3rd in league) 4.0 APG 7.44 BPG (based on 25 games recorded by Harvey Pollack, averaging 43.68 MPG)

*Bravo*. Great breakdown.

They played a game that was faster pace with very lil breaks. U still need the motor to execute all those rebounds. Wilt had way more responsibility on offensive end and still is top dog in boards he’s forever the Chairman of the boards.

Yeah I remember the game where I dropped 55 against my good friend Bill. I would have loved to have Dennis Rodman step on my court.

Jxmyhighroller, Jonny Arnett and Thinking Basketball are the best basketball channels in the KZread today. ESPN should take notice! Great content, man!

Another great vid. Thank you for producing intelligent content. Now to answer your question. I believe there are 2 possible scenarios whenever you talk about bringing a player to a different era. If we are talking about the time machine principle, where we bring prime Russell and prime Chamberlain to the modern era as they were and just plugging them into the modern game, obviously there would be an adjustment period. Once they acclimated themselves to the modern game, I believe Bill would be very similar to Dennis Rodman, but even more dominant. His intelligence and understanding of the game would transcend era and time, and his otherworldly athleticism would lead to monstrous numbers by today's standards. I would estimate his rebounding numbers around 14-18 per game easily. Wilt had so many skills that were never fully displayed in NBA games. He played for the Harlem Globetrotters for a season after he left Kansas. He started out at center for them, but, after seeing the whole scope of his skills, as well as his popularity, the team elected to move him to the starting 2 guard in order to put the ball in his hands more. I know the conventional wisdom is to equate Wilt to Shaq because of his strength and physical dominance, but understanding these skills, I believe the closest modern player to what Wilt would be in the modern game is Giannis. Looking at Giannis and what he's doing, then realizing that physically Wilt was everything he is, but taller, longer, faster, stronger and with a ridiculous vertical, I have to imagine sort of an "unleashed" version of Wilt would still average 16-20 rebounds a game. Now if you take These two and move them to the modern era where they grew up with video of Olajuwon and Shaq and watched the And 1 tour and all those things, they would be completely different people, but the talent, the physical attributes, the will to win would all be the same. In this scenario, Bill probably averages about 12-14 rebounds while focusing more of his game on offense. He is still dominant on the boards and can take over games at times.Wilt, on the other hand has a much higher ceiling. We know he was able to shoot quite well for his era. With modern coaching his jump shot develops into a serviceable at worst three point game. He was able to handle the ball as well as any center of that era. In the modern game he would absolutely dominate the boards and then be able to lead the break himself or outlet pass to a streaking teammate for easy buckets. I still see him averaging 16-20 boards consistently.

That makes a lot of sense I always wondered this

I think people don't think about height when it comes to russell and his contemporaries and more about the fact that he weighed as much as dwyane wade

Awesome video! It seems to me that, roughly adjusted for FG percentage and modern long rebounds, elite rebounders get around 30 percent of the total rebounds. If that's true, then I think 23 rebounds per game in the 1960s would be around 14 rebounds per game today. Moses Malone and Dennis Rodman would grab nearly as many rebounds as Wilt and Russell in the 1960s. And today, Wilt and Russell would grab around 15 per game. Bill Russell understood basketball at a different level than the rest of us. He's a wizard. Russell possessed an extra dimension of understanding. What we think we know about basketball, we don't - and Russell does. People forget the importance of wingspan. Wilt Chamberlain had an insane 92.5-inch wingspan. Kevin McHale was a freak at 6-10 with a 90-inch wingspan. I don't know what Russell's wingspan is, but it looks very, very long. So even though he was nearly 6-10, his arms made him MUCH longer. Here's a video I made (borrowing from others) in which I tried to show Russell's impact at game speed: kzread.info/dash/bejne/hKOMs9appdTHgco.html He was the rangiest player who ever lived. And he resided in another dimension. Let's call it, the Russell dimension.

I'd say they would average around 18 rebounds a game, playing around 36 minutes, considering the fact that teams don't tend to play their bigs more than that and that they would be dragged further from the basket. That would still make them far better rebounders than any current player. This is not taking into consideration the idea that they may be even more athletic with today's training regiment.

@milkify5102

2 жыл бұрын

Bill Russell is not averaging 18 rebounds lmfaoo

@DgSezn

2 жыл бұрын

It’s very possible, Rudy gobert is averaging 15 rebounds a game this season

@hughjass4736

2 жыл бұрын

@@milkify5102rodman average more than 13, bill Russell is far more athletic.

@milkify5102

2 жыл бұрын

@@hughjass4736 bill russell and wilt chamberlains athletic skills were highly exaggerated. Bill Russell is a top 5 player all time but he would not be the best rebounder in the league if he played today, not even close.

@ralphgreenwood2469

Жыл бұрын

​@@milkify5102Bill Russell and Wilt chamberlain could both touch the top of the backboard.There aren't any NBA players that can do that today😊

How many more videos do you guys have to make before the 5’0” white guy competition rumor is finally dropped? Great work as always.

Bro, love Your channel. The amount of facts You provide in each vid is insane. One thing You should improve is Your sound system. The content You provide is way to good to sound like that. Best of luck friend.

@jonnyarnett

2 жыл бұрын

For sure! My pinned comment on this video explains why it does. It’s definitely not the usual sounds quality. Thanks for watching the video and for the feedback :)

@Grzelsonable

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonnyarnett Oh, Yeah. Sorry then. My bad.

The reason why their rebounding stats make them look like demi-gods is because they ARE demi-gods. You can't tekk me they're not the sons of some mastermind god.

@warkunitale

2 жыл бұрын

so Bob Petit is also a demi-god ? If we're talking rebounding for example , this guy too has way more rebounds than any great rebounder the Nba has seen since the 60's

Great video and I can think of a few guys that would put up great rebounding numbers. These the only players I think that could put Wilt and Bill like numbers in their time Rodman Shaq Hakeem KG

In the past week in separate games: Andre Drummond: 43 mins, 23 reb Jarrett Allen: 34 mins, 22 reb If Wilt is playing 48 mins today he's shitting in 25 boards.

If Jonny Arnett and Jxmy were basketball analyst it will be the best day of my life

7:14 windmill rebound

I watched GM 4 of The 1965 finals, both teams literally got a shot up every 6 seconds at least.

Extremely tall, extremely strong and extremely skilled players

Well perhaps if Wilt is averaging 22.9 rebounds per season for his whole career. I reckon that with 20 less possessions a game, a 5% reduction in rebounds from there due to accuracy increase on shots and only 60% of the remainder being closer to the hoop. Wilt would be averaging 10.73 rebounds a game on 2pt shots. Plus whatever he gets on 3pt shots as Wilt is tall enough with reactions enough to be able to be able to time and judge direction off the hoop, so possibly at least 1 of those per game seems reasonable. So maybe 962 on an average season, could break 1000 if he has a strong season and has good teammates pressuring shots.

Both would still dominate, they would still finish 1-2 every year, but their gross numbers would obviously be less.

The height may be similar but the weight could be very different. I personally give Wilt the title as GOAT Rebounder because I look into Per 36. To me, it's the most reliable for all eras and it really crunches up everyone's stat as if they only played 36 minutes. It may not be perfect but I believe it is the closest we'll get.

@melvynsngltn27

2 жыл бұрын

People forget that. Wilt and Bill Russell wasn't playing against other mobile big men.

The fact they played 48 minutes a game in a much faster pace game is pretty mind blowing

I think that the field goal percentage was a result of more possessions rather than being it’s own factor as more shots means more misses as well

@warkunitale

2 жыл бұрын

It could also means more shots made but somehow you finish with a 41 fg% average for the league , this is horrendous , even Russel has a 42 fg% average in career , Wilt was one of the sole guys maybe the only really in that era with a high 50 fg% and I guess that explains his scoring numbers .

Coop video concept

Honey, Grab the kids! Jonny posted!

If they both played 30 minutes a night then because of their designated position and spots on the court I can very easily see Russ and Wilt grabbing 15-17 boards a night each, but having the ability to do more because their stamina although their lack of spacing would make it harder on coach’s to draw defenders so they might only play 30 minutes a game anyway

I looked over Gianni's and embiids rebounds. these players are definitely most similar to wilt and Russel, and I think they could really solidly put up 15 to 20 rebounds per game like you guys said in that other video

So.... putting things in perspective: Rodman in his best year played 40.3 minutes, compared to wilts 48.5 In his best year, the avr rebounds was 43.7 per team, compared to wilts 71.4 Rodman averaged 18.7 rebounds in that year. If he were to have the same nr of rebounds: 18.7 * (71.4/43.7) = 30.55 rebounds/game. If rodman would play as much (and I think Rodman is one of the few who could, given his crazy workrate they speak of): 30.55 * (48.5/40.3) = 36.78 rebounds/game. Wilt got up to 27.2, so yes. Rodman seems to be the better rebounder -- even ignoring the three point shot... and by almost 10 rebounds per game. Let that sink in. Rodman would probably have an average of 35 rebounds a game. A 50 rebound performance wouldn't be that strange; his max was 29 so about 50% more. Hence, would Wilt and Russel dominate? Probably not as much on the boards. Their rebounding figures are 'inflated' almost 100% by more playing time and more shots.

What's also worth noting is back in the day, they actually used to fight for rebounds. Nowadays, more often than not, shot goes up just get back on defense. I absolutely hate that about today's game.

Great video as usual Jonny but one thing you didn't mention was that offensive rebounds weren't even recorded in their time. I think that Wilt & Bill were as or more athletic than Rodman as well as being taller & stronger, especially Wilt. More possessions & shots mean more running up & down so to play 40+ mins for 10+ years means Bill & Wilts stamina was off the charts! Plus no crazy antics like Dennis, just even more focus, so yeah I think they could average 20+ boards any era.

@warkunitale

2 жыл бұрын

Nah though , unless they decide to do camping under the basket like back then , if not is would only be possible in their best seasons and it will dip , they would still be great rebounders though no doubt about it

@jackwalsh6758

2 жыл бұрын

@@warkunitale In 91 & 92 Dennis Rodman averaged 18rpg, so I think it possible for Wilt and Bill to have gotten 20+ in any era. I never said for their whole career but if anyone could do it, it would be them.

Can u talk about how athletic competition was as well

Taking for granted their talents and skills, I think they could easily average 16 - 18 rebounds per game nowadays.

At 9:20 reminds me so much of Ernie J when he was asked if he was white or black 🤣

The one thing all pundits overlook is that rebounding includes footwork and effort. These two rebounded well because they worked at it. They moved to a high percentage position based on the angle of the shot. Most players today don’t work for better positioning. Rodman did, which is why he did so well. Big men back then were more active than they are today.

Another thing that keeps rebounds for centers so low these days is the predominance of stretch bigs. Back then, Russell and Wilt were just hanging out under the basket on defense, today they'd be pulled out to the perimeter and their rebound numbers would go way down Another question: Given how competitive and athletic these guys are, would they have been able to develop outside shots to play as more modern big men? Russell might have stuck down low as a "throwback" big, but it's hard for me to imagine anything Wilt *couldn't* do with his game. I can absolutely picture him developing an outside shot

There's not one player today including LeBron in his prime that could clear the high jump pole at 6'6". For a 7'1" man to do it is literally insane. As for rebounding, Nate Thurmond exceeded 20+ rebounds twice in a season. Elvin Hayes averaged 18.1 in 1973-74. Walt Bellamy's top was 19.0 1961-1962.

With their talent and modern training they would be incredible today without a doubt

also dont forget players back then werent making as much money as they are today and many players were semi pro (working jobs on the side), which means the overall level of competition isnt comparable.

What about the 3 second rule also you could hang in the paint.

Rebounding is a very hard art to master. You need to be instinctive, meaning you need to be at the right place at the right time, everytime. You also need the size, strength and athleticism to back it up. Honestly, players nowadays are far more athletic than the athletes in the past and they will dominate the boards. BUT and a big but, Bill and Wilt are anomalies in their time. Even if they played more minutes, their stamina is just inhuman that they can still keep up. They deserve to be called demigods of rebounds just because they were just good at grabbing boards. To those telling that Wilt and Bill will be just average in today's game, you need to check them if they're on crack.

Jonny Arnett - has to do a video on Wilt Chamberlain playing under the alias "GEORGE MARCUS" IN PROFESSIONAL BASKETBALL WHEN HE WAS 16

Just like the US economy, rebounds have hit inflation. What was 30-40 rebounds in the 1960s is now only 12-15 on average.

If we did approximation math by putting the ratio of 60s / Present era avg rebound per team at 70/40 and applied it to Wilt's 25 rebound per game average, the number comes to 14.29 rebounds a game today. This is an awesome league-topping number but one that makes sense and not demigoddish.

Imagine blocks were recorded back then. 😱

I can only imagine how long it takes to write the code for these numbers

The stats at the Basketball Reference site are amazing. Let's look at the difference between Wilt's '61-'62 season (the 50.4 ppg season) and the last full season that LeBron played ('17-'18) For Wilt, the regular season started on 10/19/61 and ended on 3/14/62. 80 games in 147 days. In those 80 games, Wilt played 12 back-to-backs, 8 triple headers, 2 stints of four straight days and between 1/17/62 and 1/21/62 five consecutive nights (!!) (granted it was a home stint). In that five game stretch (two of which were OT games), Wilt averaged 55 ppg and 25.2 rpg, while on the floor for every single minute of the 250 minutes. For LeBron, the '17-'18 regular season started on 10/17/17 and ended on 4/11/18. 82 games in 177 days; two more games in thirty extra days. In those 82 games LeBron played 13 back-to-backs. No triple headers and certainly no four- or five-game stretches. Granted in '61-'62 the only team west of the Mississippi was the LA Lakers (OK, OK, technically the St Louis Hawks were west of the Mississippi, but only by a couple of miles). And usually when a team played the Lakers, they were back-to-backs on one team's court. But there was one MASSIVE difference -- in the '60s teams mostly traveled commercially by air, and many times by bus. All this to say that you really shouldn't discount the teams and players of the '60s and early '70s. To do so is usually due to recency bias. While we can all argue as to who is the GOAT from now until the end of time, to say the players of the '60s weren't athletes is foolish. Check out Oscar Robertson's first five years for one example. One thing that would be hard to argue against is that Wilt was the most physically dominant player in NBA history. I mean, who else dislocated an opposing player's shoulder with a shot block?

HOW GOOD WAS ALONZO MOURNING ACTUALLY A VIDEO ON THE 94 FIBA TEAM (THE REAL DREAM TEAM 2)

My guess is that Wilt with his speed, agility and strength would ave around 14-17 in his prime. Wouldnt be surprised if he had some 32-17-5-1-4 type seasons..Giannis shit but more athletic. Russ would have 17-15-6-2-3 numbers, like a Draymond but Rodmans RBs and Joakim Noah offense

it's funny how wilts 50 inch high jump story has been spun into people now claiming wilt had a 50 inch vertical. High jump and vertical jump are very different things

The rims back then were also built with much less give. They were closer to outdoor rims than the ones the NBA has been using since at least the early 90s.

@kevinhouse4376

9 ай бұрын

I had read that once before, but I'd love to see more info on it.