Great work, brother David. Excellent information!

@lufknuht5960

6 ай бұрын

BIG FALSEHOODS

@jesusisking1-v6v

5 ай бұрын

How so ? The proof is in the pudding ...just open the bibles and read them .look at all the changes in these perversions .disgusting ​@lufknuht5960

I am dying laughing here. Dr. Daniels' sarcasm is on fire. Thank you, Brother. Great expose. God bless you.

Wish I could give you 10 thumbs up. Yes, it is a wonderful day to hear you say "it was created around 1839-40....". Been waiting for you to make that type of declarative statement since you first began this series. Still hoping to hear a release date on your upcoming book. Great news that you have another one already in the works. As always, thank you and those around you for all you do in His name. May God bless!

You had some wacky professors in cemetery, I mean in seminary. Great information!

@jesuschrististruth3731

7 жыл бұрын

Greyhound Mama Good one 😅

@florinteo6795

6 жыл бұрын

This fella in the video is a little wacky...

@michaelstevens6063

5 жыл бұрын

David Daniels is my professor! Thank God for You Tube!

I think everyone needs to do their part and forward links to these videos to their pastors, Sunday school teachers, church acquaintances, and the like. True lovers of the Word will see through this mirage. The light of Truth shines bright in this series. Well done, David!

Thanks David - a great summary of the truth (and the lies of Sinaiticus). Keep the good work. God's Blessings to you

The $10,000 question: how did the church manage without a “correct” translation of scripture until the 1800s? That is what modern scholars and skeptics would have us to believe.

Wow! Keep up the good work. God Bless You!

Thanks you once again David for your continued enthusiasm to shine a light on the deception and lies, meant to deceive.

Sir, you truly are a defender of the Faith!

Amen brother David. God has used ( & is using) you greatly to help me desire & continue to learn and study His Word in my KJV!!! Much love and prayer from us down here in Oceanside CA! Eventually, we’re going to start a bible based church down here, “Simple Faith Church Oceanside”. “Where the Bible changes us, we don’t change the Bible” lol. Thank you, please continue to make full proof of thy ministry !!!!

Since they changed the NIV again, Luke 24:51 appears as the original Textus Receptus has it. Maybe when they change the NIV again they'll include more of the original text. Only problem is that when they change it again, all that might go out the window. It's hard to follow the "thought-for-though translations" (which are only paraphrases, written by unbelievers).

@lufknuht5960

6 ай бұрын

The TR is not the original. It was composed in the early modern era.

The thing is that some pages are white and some brown because tishendorf had only about 40 pages he browned with coffee. Ok now what about the vaticanus?

I love the way you explained it, very straight to the point. I learned a lot from you. Thank God for this old man. 😁 God bless you more to teach us.

@junjun1421

4 жыл бұрын

I forgot to say LOVE AND PRAY from Indonesia. Thanks old man 👍

Thank-you for the Truth. You Made My Day To Take Hold Of My King James Bible And Don't Let Go.

Thank you for all your detailed work in exposing that 'flaky fake'. While you were going through the series on the Sinaiticus, you had me at edge of my seat waiting for the next installment. You covered every last detail with a fine-toothed comb! 'Left no stone unturned.' God bless you and yours.

In short, these two codices are old simply because, first, they were written on extremely expensive and durable antelope skins, and secondly, they were so full of errors, alterations, and deletions, that they were never used by true believers and seldom even by their own custodians. Thus they had little chance of wearing away." John Burgon on Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Bing search

It's obvious that K.Tischendorf saw himself as the hero and great scholar, who was to be admired for his dedication to find and persue such an ancient text, going back to 400AD !

@petetumas6513

2 жыл бұрын

The LORD Jesus loves you -- First Person -- and He took your punishment -- (not second hand)

How awesome! Simply amazing video! Its good to know you're doing a book about the siniticus, so ALL the info of the videos will be in your upcoming book? Gonna get me one of those.

@chicktracts

7 жыл бұрын

All the vlog information about Sinaiticus, up through the Smoking Gun video, will be in the upcoming book. My present videos about who made Sinaiticus are going into the next book. Thanks for asking! - David

@jesuschrististruth3731

7 жыл бұрын

Chicktracts Sweet can't wait! Godbless you David and your co workers!

Great question there at the beginning. And no way! I have your website saved in my browser tabs 😆

Two problems: 1) We do not know the intentions of the authors of Codex Sinaiticus (i.e. did they have another opinion on Jesus, i.e. Arianism. The church fathers mentioned they were combatting heresies even in the first few centuries). This muddies every analysis, so the text should only be read with this caution in mind. 2) As far as I know it hasn't been carbon dated yet (Constantine Simonides stated it was his forgery from the 1840'ies)

When I first got saved many years ago, I got the Good News Bible which I never really liked. I then went to the biggest selling bible of the day, the NIV. I noticed the verses David mentioned with notes that said 'the earliest and most reliable manuscripts do not have...'. After that, I had real trouble wondering what else is false in the bible. I had a dark period where I almost lost my faith but came back like the lost prodigal I was. But this time I felt compelled to get the NKJV as I found the KJV too archaic to read, as poetic as it was in many parts. I have now ordered the KJVER (easy reader), which will now be my main bible along with the NKJV.

@spanishfly7709

4 жыл бұрын

Get rid of that NKJV that is a heretical book I compared scripture from KJV and NKJV.

Love the King James Bible. Learn it, love it.

"there's no mention of Jesus bodily resurrection in the Sinaiticus Gospels at all, mark 16 or Luke 24" Straight from the Codex Sinai website, Mark 16:6 "But he says to them: Be not amazed. You seek Jesus the Nazarene who was crucified; *HE HAS RISEN, he is NOT HERE* : see the place where they laid him." 'nuff said...

Sorry Dave, I was a KJV only believer for most of my life, now I have been a Critical Text believer for over a year. Always been a big fan of yours, and love your research. Actually, it was you that helped me come to this, thank you.

@crackedwhip

6 жыл бұрын

LOL, listen to yourself. I was an ignorant KJV believer. I didn't "switch to heretics like Westcott and Hort", I switched to The Great Uncial Codices.

@crackedwhip

6 жыл бұрын

Can you give me an example of the info that I'm being ignorant of?

@crackedwhip

6 жыл бұрын

I don't trust The Textus Receptus. I used to, very much.

@crackedwhip

6 жыл бұрын

It's all skeptics, I used to believe the same as you.

@nb3500

5 жыл бұрын

@VoteForTRUMP There is absolutely no textual evidence for the King James version of the Bible being even remotely close to what the Apostles by the divine power of God were inspired to write. It contains readings presented in Erasmus' Textus Receptus that were not know by Christendom until its initiation and it contains numerous instances of expansion and additions to the text which have no manuscript or patristical evidence. People such as Josh and I firmly believe in the inspired preservation of Scripture but that preservation is not found in the KJV.

Brilliant, as ever. Thank you so much !

@florinteo6795

6 жыл бұрын

I don't know what you find brilliant... what you call brilliant, I call blinded by faith. Ask yourself why the hell they believe that what they claim is true, find out why, and than see if you ca believe a wacky fella...

I'm looking forward to your new book. I'm reading through Look What's Missing and it surprises me that so many respected, fundamental pastors who use modern Bible translations don't grasp that they are trusting in the wisdom of man not in the wisdom of God. How can anyone trust a Bible that is a work in progress waiting for the next inevitable revision? God bless you and your important work!

I have many modern bible translations and I tried them and they are all the same, they feel wrong, and without going into too much detail let's just say they lack detail and lack inspiration. I trust the Authorized Version because it feels like I am being fed spiritually when I read it and I am more focused and it does help me grow as a Christian without any doubt. There is much to be said about the Authorized Version because it was translated by men who were all about serving God and doing their very best to make sure that we got the very best manuscripts that told us the whole story and not to take away any of the important doctrines and truths that God wants us to know to help us grow spiritually and to get the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth of God's holy word...

Codex Sinaiticus is not the only ancient manuscripts of the Bible. There are thousands of them! Some of the papyrus manuscripts are even older than the Codex Sinaiticus! These ancient manuscripts contain variant readings. Textual critics compare these variant readings to determine the most likely original reading of the Bible. They apply a set of scientific criteria like dating of the manuscripts, provenance, scribal errors, text type, family of manuscripts, etc. for choosing the best reading. This video does not really explain the methodology of textual criticism, and so it cannot criticize the work of textual critics. Some of the texts used in KJV have been found by textual critics not to be the best readings. KJV is a beautiful translation but it's not perfect. It's good to compare its texts with those of the other translations like NKJV, RSV, NRSV, NIV, NAB, NABRE, JB, etc. which have been examined by textual critics. When textual critics can't be sure which variant reading to choose, these translations of the Bible would usually place the alternative readings in the footnote so the readers would know that there are variant readings.

Praise God blessing us with your diligent work, cutting through the deception. praying for you and yours, your sister in Christ, karil

Heaven and Earth will pass away but his (God's) word will live forever.

Thank you so much for all the research that you have done on this subject. God bless you.

The resurrection passage in Mark 16 is quite different from the John 8 woman taken in adultery apocryphal addition. The Mark 16 passage is only missing from 2 major ancient Greek texts , so far as I have seen. And as the ending of a book, it can easily be explained by the last page of a codex wearing off. But if some passage is of disputed genuineness, it is OK to include it & note what witnesses have it & which do not. Those 2 passages (at John 8 & Mark 16) are the only substantial passages of such dispute.

I won't let go! Thank you for your research🙂

So if Tischendorf included the apocryphal addition to the NT, didn't T include a statement that it was spurious (but included because modern Christians are used to seeing it)?

Thanks for the video!

great Job Brother David, and you are spot on in your presentation, love and enjoy watching your videos, im a kJ believer and, i get a lot of slack from a lot of people but i will never use any other bible

This is a great question. Because they love to include their notes casting doubt on the received text.

Thank you David. God bless you!

Love your videos on the so called old manuscripts. Thank you for sharing and God bless

PEOPLE, the information is out there, this is just a opinion! Search for others that have the same opinion with this guy! See why others believe otherwise! Be sure, if what this guy thinks it true, people will know with proofs not only assumptions.

@petetumas6513

2 жыл бұрын

The LORD Jesus loves you -- First Person -- and He took your punishment

I appreciate your work sir. May God bless you.

Thank you for making this easy to understand and I love that all your research is in hard copy! I wish I could tour your library ☺️

God bless u sir!

I have read today codex Sianiticus Mark 16; 9-20 and it shows that Mark 16; 9-20 has been removed, you can see it clearly.

Today's lesson. If you don't like something it must be fake.

Wouldn't it be great if this becomes common knowledge and everyone throws all those bible perVersions away and go back to the King James Bible?

@oldtimerlee8820

7 жыл бұрын

We have a job to do.... to do our part to make it "common knowledge". As with the parable of the seed and the sower, we are do broadcast seeds of truth. God will handle the rest. God Bless.

@chiefjoboo

7 жыл бұрын

Oldtimer Lee Amen, brother!

@JJFrostMusic

5 жыл бұрын

@@oldtimerlee8820 No that's those old Greek text of the bible are valuable and tell us the history of our faith, why not preserve them and study them to find what the purest translation of the bible.

@Solideogloria00

5 жыл бұрын

King James? really? King James onlyism destroys the Bible's reliability. Christians need to wake up and do some reading. Defend the Bible (Greek Manuscripts) not a translation of it (KJV).

@JJFrostMusic

5 жыл бұрын

@@Solideogloria00 amen

You beautiful brother thank u for this video god bless u for it and your wisdom

This guy's tradition don't allow his to understand the Bible's transmission and reliability. Sad.

This is fake news. There are plenty of NT scholars that believe both the bodily resurrection of Jesus and the ascension as well ... and reject KJVonlyism idolatry. You have completely misrepresented the vast majority of NT scholars.

@petetumas6513

2 жыл бұрын

The LORD Jesus loves you -- First Person -- and He took your punishment -- No Doubt

Wait, so which is the oldest Bible then? Would it be the codex Vaticanus?

Mr David! I hope that Jesus gives you an blessing to tech classes, on how to start and finish the history of the bible. I have two of your books. I have read them, but I believe you have a calling for learning and teaching for feeble christian like me. I have been watching you vlogs for some time now, but I am always lost of the history and timeline you are explaining. you do an excellent job at this I really do believe you are the one of the few man who is standing up to the devil plan. Mr David please stay safe and please make more videos. I.E. two books that I have.did the catholic church give us the bible and Looks What Missing.

@chicktracts

7 жыл бұрын

Instead of being in a classroom, I am giving away teaching in videos, and then making books that put it all together, with documentation. That's the best way I know to use my time and resources. Thanks for asking! - David

@user-yq3kj9ub4w

7 жыл бұрын

no problem Mr David, thank you for answering. I apologize if I came off disrespectful. I'm just very eager to learn from you. once again thank you very much, I cant wait for those new books.

So Luke didn't say Jesus ascended into Heaven in the Gospels, but he did in Acts? So, what's the problem🤔

What Old Testament books or partial books is it missing?

I was checking out a verse in 2 Samuel 21; 19 in the NASB it says that Elanan killed Galiath, not David killed Galiath also John 1; 18 says Begotten God not Begotten Son and Luke 4; 4 half theverse is missing.

Awesome as always brother! Godbless!

Great work brother. Without you and your work I would probably have believed a lot of the lies from 'scholars ' and their fanboys..God bless you!

Astonishing-well done-this is so helpful.

great research brother.

Who is they when you say “they lied”. The text is the text. No one altered Sinaiticus, you seem to be imputing a lot more than the text is actually saying.

@heavenlyguitar5913

4 жыл бұрын

You obviously haven’t researched this. Sinaiticus was written in the 1800’s, not the fourth century like “they” (the Vatican and other Bible corrupters), claim.

@petetumas6513

2 жыл бұрын

@@heavenlyguitar5913 Amen!

I wish there was a new book, with a translation of the Textus Receptus (KJV is one), and 3 other parallel columns, of Sinaiticus, Vaticanus and Alexandrinus, so we can see the simply HUGE differences, omissions and changes in easy to read form, not only between the two texts (Textus Receptus versus Alexandrian), but how the other 3 MASSIVELY contradict each other. It would blow people's minds how inaccurate the Alexandrian Greek is, even in contradicting itself! How can it therefore fulfil the EVERY WORD kept perfect prophecy of Matthew 4:4???????

@jorgejorhoe3129

6 жыл бұрын

You can see parallel versions in English, easily, by using Bible Gateway. For example: Mark 16:9-20 removed, Denies the bodily resurrection of Jesus . . . www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%2016&version=KJV;NIV;ESV;RSV;NASB You can see what position GotQuestions holds: Should Mark 16:9-20 be in the Bible? . . . Answer: Although the vast majority of later Greek manuscripts contain Mark 16:9-20, the Gospel of Mark ends at verse 8 in two of the oldest and most respected manuscripts, the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus. As the oldest manuscripts are known to be the most accurate because there were fewer generations of copies from the original autographs (i.e., they are much closer in time to the originals), and the oldest manuscripts do not contain vv. 9-20, we can conclude that these verses were added later by scribes . . . www.gotquestions.org/Mark-16-9-20.html

@jorgejorhoe3129

6 жыл бұрын

Another Bible ~ Another Gospel: Tables of Comparison of Selected Scriptures Affecting Fundamental Doctrines of the Christian Faith . . . Greek Textus Receptus ~ Hebrew Masoretic Text ~ King James Version ~ New King James Version ~ English Revised Version ~ New American Standard Bible ~ New International Version . . . www.watch-unto-prayer.org/scripture.html

@Jesusandbible

6 жыл бұрын

I want to the the content of the MS themselves, as the modern versions used them in a inconsistent fashion, and ended up different even from each other. Having the KJV Textus receptus running down in 4 columns with Sinaiticus Vaticanus and Alexandrinus would show up the anomalies better

@jorgejorhoe3129

6 жыл бұрын

I don't think that would be of any use, unless you plan to learn Greek, also. Good luck with that.

@Jesusandbible

6 жыл бұрын

I can read Greek, but 4 interlinear are best, spread over two pages, two on each page

Thank you, Dave.

interesting. thank you for your insight. I'm interested in this for other reasons.

Great video

The Sinaiticus does not deny the resurrection of Christ, this is flat out wrong. Sinaiticus ends at Mark 16:8 instead of verse 19. There are hints and many scholars think these verses were added later. Regardless of what you do with these missing verses it irrelevant to the resurrection.

So Daniels' great reveal here is that the earliest known version of the new testament was missing text that was later added by unknown scribes in later versions but that the same information exists in other parts of the new testament. In other words Daniels clearly supports the facts described by bible scholars. That scribes later added to the original gospel entire sections of new text to support their apologist views.

@petetumas6513

2 жыл бұрын

The LORD Jesus loves you -- First Person -- and He took your punishment -- (not second hand)

Thank you sir for sharing this information with us.

The 1901ASV is the publishing of the Westcott & Hort Critical Text which used as its base both Sinaticus and Vaticanus Codexes.

@lufknuht5960

6 ай бұрын

THE 1901 ASV had as its foundation the KJV, & it took, as I recall 2/3 of the scholars vote to change the KJV. I don't believe at all any claim that the ASV is a translation of W&H. But both W&H & ASV had more ancient manuscripts to use that KJV did, by far.

I love my mathematically and doctrinally perfect KJB!

Great video BUT Mark WAS the first Gospel written. Matthew and Luke clearly used Mark's Gospel.

Wasn’t the bases of mark being the first gospel built on a fake copy of mark that was believed to be the oldest copy. That also didn’t have the Ascension? 9:08

Thank you for this video. What original manuscript was King James Bible translated from?

Thank you so much for sharing your research.

Interestingly enough, Watchtower’s New World Translation DOES remove both Mark 16:9-20, and John 7:53 thru 8:11.

You are hilarious and persuasive.

great job David God bless you and glory to our savior Jesus Christ

I’m sorry where I can find your church? Could you please let me know. Thank you.

I would like to buy this bible for my daughters will be difficult for them to understand it? I bought the NKV because I didn’t know.

God bless you.

the woman caught in adultery passage is known not to exist in the earliest manuscripts, so that's nothing new that it doesn't exit here either.

Wow. Exposing the roots of Bible doubts, so Faithfully!

Praying i dont ever get that.i had sinusitus before, and needed antibiotics. lol! Sincerely though brother,praying for you and Christ Bless His ministry through you,unto Him! Thank you very much for it and for your teaching!

what about the vaticanus ?

Does this mean that Jesus was a descendant of Ishmael... according to the error ?

I had a good laugh😂😂😂 This is the oldest and most reliable bible ?

I thought when I started watching this video that I might see something from a compentent scholar. Instead I get this. Refuting all the claims made by this nitwit would take up too much space. First of all, I have never heard anybody claim the Codex Sinaiticus to be the world's oldest bible. Codex Vaticanus and most papyri are older. Second, the notion that Sinaiticus was created in 19th century is absurd. It dates from the late 4th. Third, the absence of Mark xvi. 9-20 does not mean that Sinaiticus denies either the Resurrection or the Ascension. Nor does it follow that the codex teaches adoptionism. It is rather obvious that you have no concept whatsoever of the science of textual criticism, nor of the basic principles of that discipline.

@petetumas6513

2 жыл бұрын

The LORD Jesus loves you -- First Person -- and He took your punishment -- (not second hand)

@rejim.philip9431

Жыл бұрын

I think everyone is claiming that codex sanai is the oldest bible..

@allanroberts5689

Жыл бұрын

@@rejim.philip9431 It's not.

Sinaiticus said Mary went to the tomb and the rock had been removed. So Obviously if Jesus wasn’t there . He resurrected.

@Snes64

8 ай бұрын

He's desperate to discredit it, as his defiled book is at stake.

Your argument went kooky when you claimed Sinaticus was an invention of the 19th Century. Do you have a shred of evidence for this claim?

What ancient manuscript does not have errors in it? Sinaiticus is an ancient witness to the text of the NT. Since the (mostly) John 8 story about the woman taken in adultery is an apocryphal addition to the NT, it is great that Sinaiticus does not have it. The idea that a criminal cannot be punished unless the judge, jury, or punishers have not sinned, of course is absurd -- no crime would ever be punished. why the big smirk on the face?

off subject. why is there an addition of Cainan as son of Arphaxad and father of Shela in Luke 3:36? My Westminster Bible dictionary say Luke took this from the LXX. I with you and do not believe there was an LXX then and the HS would not make a mistake. Any help?

@petetumas6513

2 жыл бұрын

Watch David's series on the LXX

What about the story of the snake, apple and Eva? Is this story in this bible?

Any thoughts on Andrew Gabriel Roth and his research?

I’ll just stick to my Koren and JPS Tanakh. Yes, I believe the Christ is the Moshiach (I align more with the Messianic Jews). Faith is key. As Avraham showed.

Vaticanus has Shepherd of Hermas and the Epistles of Clement and Barnabas, there has never been a uniform, universally accepted Canon of the Bible. Jews use a 1,000 year old version that has less books than the Orthodox Christian which is more than the Hebrew based Protestant KJV that follows the Jewish Canon, although it did not always lack the Apocrypha.

Very interesting! Ps. I hope you get right on repentance, I like how Curtis Hutson explains it

this guy complains about oldest bible doesnt have stories like the woman caught in adultery in it..Dude most old bible if not all were handle more times and books and pages wore out or gets lost..thank God that the Bible was not just written once! when a bible got old they re-wrote it.and so on and so on..thats why some old bibles dont have all the books

Congreatturetion.Fraternal Brotrher ofChickPublications..

Love you brother

Sunaiticus was a rough draft of the Bible. The first Bible came out after 382.

Thank you for bringing the deception so clearly to light.