Underwater mines: 😊😊😊 Underwater mines: 💀💀💀

@ConstantChaos1

5 күн бұрын

Tbh when I clicked on the video I was expecting this to be about them taking action against russia who is trying to take one of their archipelagos that has a coal mine I mean I still enjoyed the video and I still would have clicked if I had known but still (Idk the channel so I had no context as to the channel direction)

@SAMIAMFNX

5 күн бұрын

@@ConstantChaos1 same

@FoulPet

5 күн бұрын

@ConstantChaos1 me 2. Expectations subverted.

@timothynechville8326

4 күн бұрын

Prove it

@FoulPet

3 күн бұрын

@@timothynechville8326 prove what?

This is what happens when the guys that grew up playing Minecraft start getting their first jobs

@TheAnikasis

5 күн бұрын

Taking subnautica to a whole other level.

@Likeaworm

5 күн бұрын

Europe needs to innovate if they want a spot on the world stage in the future.

@sakakaka4064

4 күн бұрын

The door trick doesn't work irl though

@fuzzyspackage

Күн бұрын

Big love

@jt197

11 сағат бұрын

😂😂😂😂

Norway shows itself as green but most of their income comes from oil and gas selling while they themselves use electric cars. Everything is for profit. So they will mine because it is profitable.

@morgan5941

5 күн бұрын

Sounds like green energy is black as coal.

@Mosern1977

5 күн бұрын

The reason for this is mainly that Norway has extensive deep water industrial knowledge due to operating large oil-rigs in deep water and hostile environments. So its a match made in heaven for Norwegian companies, if it turns out to be an economically and environmentally viable thing.

@tordenskjold5514

4 күн бұрын

💰💰💰💰💰💰

@BBBrasil

4 күн бұрын

As it should. The West raises lots of regulatory laws (good or bad is up to you) that makes it expensive to mine, meanwhile China's CCP doesn't care about hugging trees environmentally friendly procedures. We say NIMBY but we don't care if Chinese children develop cancer, we cannot be responsible about what CCP does to their population, can we? Edit: but we continue to buy made in China gadgets, batteries, BEV's, jewelry, clothes, we don't care about their ecology, right? Wait to see what they will do to the CCZ. Oh, it is deep water mining, no one can visually monitor what they are doing there...

@ratardobatardo

4 күн бұрын

yes its a constant discussion here. but oil is inevitable, if we dont sell it someone else surely will. what we do with our profits, however, is trying to become as enviromentally friendly as possible

- Is the explosive in the mine yours? - Yes, it's a mine mine of mine

@henrikbergman4055

3 күн бұрын

Queue seagulls from Finding Nemo.

And here I was thinking they're about to start laying Claymores on the sea floor😂

@SW-qr8qe

5 күн бұрын

Also me

@richardletaw4068

5 күн бұрын

Yeah, there’s some ambiguity there…

The thing is, we need the resources. Metals are highly recyclable, but when our cars are to drive electrically and our heating and cooking should function electrically we need more copper to achieve that. And thats okay, because once we have these metals, we can recycle them over and over again and use green energy. Might be 100 years away, but i think it is the way to go. Next thing: The earth is 70% water and 30% land. Even on land our mines take up a very small percentage of space. Highlighting all that ground is misleading, it would take ages to mine that much space under water. I think it is a possibility we need to evaluate. Maybe agree on zones etc, bc fishing can be renewable if you only take what can regenerate. Yes minerals dont regenerate, but the wildlife can if done right. Im all for saving animals from extinction, but i am not naive to think that banning this will solve any problem. Cause remember, the world needs these resources and they will get them. Better highly developed countries like norway agree on how to mine it as responsible as possible, rather than a mine in south america or africa pouring chemicals all over the place, having workers die in unsafe condistions etc. Cause thats what is happening otherwise. China is the biggest producer of rare earth minerals, dont be naive and think they do it more environmentally friendly than we could do.

@subcitizen2012

5 күн бұрын

We could all start walking tomorrow and forego cars all together. That's what the world needs.

@TheSaltyAdmiral

5 күн бұрын

Every time a species goes exist, it's like chopping off one pillar to the foundation of your house, and we don't know which one is the last before the entire thing collapses. How much raw materials would you say our global ecosystem is worth?

@arnoldmbuthia2687

4 күн бұрын

you have been convinced to think that you need it, and a few decades later after such mines are exploited, you will be convinced you need to go to the arctic and antarctic to mine fossil fuels. It's capitalism at its finest.

@BoredomItself

4 күн бұрын

For reference of the potential damage, the vast majority of macroscopic life in these areas live on the nodules. That life does not show signs of recovering where these nodules have been removed in the past. This isn't removing something from their environment, it's removing their environment.

@ronblack7870

4 күн бұрын

@@subcitizen2012 make your children walk to school

Norway somehow finding yet another source of valuable natural resources

We unlock a kaiju .... Godzilla time

Underwater mining should be banned, because it might be harmful, but surface mining is ok, because we know for certain that it's harmful. great logic by so-called environmentalists

@RENO_K

Күн бұрын

Yeah exactly 😂 It's alwa a Pandora's box, are you willing to potentially make it worse Or you can just make ordinary on land mining more enviormental One has the potential of cascading risks one is a known risk Would you eat a pie that you don't know whether it might just poison you to death or might be the most delicious pie ever?

@ntw9218

Күн бұрын

@@RENO_K The alternative is eating a definitely poisonous pie, and there's no option to pick neither, so yes

@OrbitalVibes

10 сағат бұрын

Because your braindead folks have no logic to think that if we screw up marina life, WE ALL WILL BE DOOMED! ITS MUCH WORSE TO FKUP SOMETHING IN THE SEA THAN ON LAND! SMART ASS BOB THE BUILDER! 🤦‍♂️

I actually thought they want to rig the sea floor with explosives lol.

@mr.boomguy

5 күн бұрын

Ikr. Dumb double meaning words. You can easily mix them up without context

I mean we either mine on land, completely deleting whole chunks of terrain, or we scoop loose valuables from the seafloor, seems like an upgrade

@sylvester4207

16 сағат бұрын

One thing ive heard is that the animals on the bottom of the food chain live there. So that might be bad i guess

@OrbitalVibes

10 сағат бұрын

NO ONE IS GONNA SCOOP ANYTHING! THEY ARE DRILLING AND EXPLODING INSIDE DRILLED HOLES! SAME BS AS ON LAND -DUST CLOUDS THAT EVERYONE HATE TO SEE & DEFINITELY DONT WANT TO BREATH IN!

When even an oil company gets concerned about the envirement, you might reconsider your idea.

@recoil53

4 күн бұрын

Yeah, it's like Hitler saying you seem a bit excitable and need to chill out

@michanowak3001

4 күн бұрын

Of course it is. Most of those minerals are much more used in EV than with combustion engine can also be used to produce solars and wind turbines. So if this makes EV much cheaper to produce then there is much less price difference in between both types so more people will be wiling to buy EV making less profits to oil companies. It's just a bussines man doing bussines. Stop or slow down competition before it have chance to question your position.

@LeUtubeAcc

4 күн бұрын

@@michanowak3001 That's what I thought immediately, oil companies need competition and this will benefit cummon people and businesses, while putting rich oil business monkeys on shakier grounds as it should. The world is already too dependent on oil making it a geopolitical resource.

@BBBrasil

4 күн бұрын

@@LeUtubeAcc Also consider that China doesn't like its deep dependence on cheap oil, the faster they transition their economy to be less dependent on oil the better for them. Also, CCP doesn't care about the environmental disaster made by large scale mining. We do and that's why everything we produce is expensive.

@RobespierreThePoof

4 күн бұрын

They are legally obligated to do environmental impact assessments. The requirements are obviously stronger in some nations compared to others, but Norway has signed into quite a bit of EU law as part of its many treaties with Brussels and Norwegian citizens are notoriously "green.". If you care as much as you seem to, maybe you should actually look into the specifics instead of making cynical comments.

So i have just one thing to say: you know that there are no nodules in the Norwegian EEZ right? Its all sub-surface ore seams, and most if not all of the points you brought up do not apply when doing remote sub-surface mining. Its literaly two completely different types of mining

Norwegian here: Scoop up nodules, scoop!

since china thinks artificial islands extends their maritime borders, maybe america should make some along the clarion clipperton fracture zone. fair is fair

There will be absolutely no reduction in emissions from deep sea mining in contrast there will be an increase in emissions as a result. Never once have humans stopped mining in an original location when we find a different source. It will still be mining on land plus now we are mining the sea bed. Then in the future it will be we are mining on land, we are mining the sea floor and we are launching rockets to space to mine X or Y. But the entire time we are continuing to mine every other place we were already mining.

Personally I see seabed mining is good move compared to land mining, as long as it done responsibly : No mining on seabed where coral lives, not using chemical, and keep the noise level low. The bad part is it will be hard to monitor as the operation is hard from common eyes to observe.

And they call it a Mine... A MINE?

@Meauss

5 күн бұрын

This is no mine... it's a tomb.

@ConstantChaos1

5 күн бұрын

It is mine, I tell you. My own. My precious.

@ishpeeedy

4 күн бұрын

Cast it into the fire !​@@ConstantChaos1

AMAZING! As always a kinda unknown subject brought to life in amazing detail and storytelling.

Isn't it quite irony that the path to green energy, you need to do something as similar or worse to the planet as a whole.

@Tybold63

3 күн бұрын

Yeah it is and using batteries spells environmental damage

@OrbitalVibes

10 сағат бұрын

Isn't it crazy that even with a.i humanity is still too dumb to solve this issue!? 🤷‍♂️ A.I already fond more than enough CHEAP synthetic materials to replace ALL minable minerals. Heck a.i even found new & better minerals that was not discored before & is better than some mined materials! The future of humanity is in A.I, NOT on the bottom of the sea! 🤷‍♂️

WE NEED MINING RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!

6:34 ah yes, that is the exact way that earth rotates

@survive7771

3 күн бұрын

the satelite/camera angle is going north

if i were to guess, they’re mining underwater to mine stuff that’s underwater

@subcitizen2012

5 күн бұрын

Their mining it because it's theirs.

i see so many complaining we don't know if vacuuming the sea bed wil be bad so it is bad

@ConstantChaos1

5 күн бұрын

Yes, taking action without knowing its consequences is a bad thing, especially for as massive an operation as this is. It's not that people dont know it's that the scientific community doesnt know so no appropriate environmental studies can be done to monitor impact Blindly destroying a vital and fragile ecosystem is a bad thing and risking doing that just for profit is just as bad if not worse

@subcitizen2012

5 күн бұрын

If you're such an expert, then why should we listen to you?

@t84t748748t6

5 күн бұрын

@@ConstantChaos1 it isnt vital and i doub fragile its a giant dark seabed we dont know much because there is not much there but lets not mine there because there can be something there i feel we complaining to much about this

@ConstantChaos1

5 күн бұрын

@@t84t748748t6 those are both incorrect statements and denying reality wont change that.

@azurblau4144

4 күн бұрын

no, we already know that it is bad (like in "we are taking away the environment for species to life"-bad), we just dont know how bad it will affect us at the end

It’s too bad that the Hughes Glomar Explorer was scrapped, as it was ideal for manganese nodule mining.

I'm okay with this

U need to update ur facts. USA has made huge discoveries as well as Scandinavia countries. But it will take awhile to get these mines online.

Lets at least try it. The UK, New zealand, france, Japan and portugal have a lot to gain if this can be done well.

@BBBrasil

4 күн бұрын

The Green parties, which all receive money from China, will raise lots of regulatory issues that will make mining too expensive. That plays well for China that doesn't care about environment. They will continue to exert power and influence by not hugging trees. I am not saying the green agenda is not important, it is, I am just pointing out the hypocrisy of different weights and measures.

@PhungBach_nv

4 күн бұрын

And how much sure u can guess when ppl around tell them stop before they destroyed the ocean ? when the money already running no activity group or green or whatever jellyfish can stop it

When people are discussing mining nodules from the seafloor, usually there's a lost Soviet submarine in the area. Ref (some keywords): Project Azorian, Glomar Explorer, K-129, Howard Hughes, circa 1974.

That's SIR David Attenborough my friend ;) love your work btw

I think there are viable concerns about the environmental impact of deep-sea mining. But we're always up against the next-best... all the companies who signed the moratorium still plan on demanding these metals from far dirtier sources. For an extractive industry like mining, literally picking up rocks off the ground is about as good as you can get

It seems like from an environmental standpoint since it's so easy to do we should just limit the speed of which they do it. Your mining tool can only be so wide, you can only go in a square kilometer every so many months. Taking into consideration tidal drift, you need to somehow figure out how to get rid of animals safely. Hopefully we don't totally screw this up 🤞

Norway playing subnautica

What is title and what you talking about I thought Norway putting underwater mines for security purpose lol

@ConstantChaos1

5 күн бұрын

They are considering doing that as well due to Russian provocation on one of the archipelagos that has a russian coal mine leased on it.

why sow lifeforms. show the sea at 3000-5000m thats the place its about. not coral reefs

@ConstantChaos1

5 күн бұрын

What? Like genuinely what are you trying to say? The ocean bed at that depth does have life if thats what you're trying to argue against

@bennyklabarpan7002

5 күн бұрын

Beyond 300 meters depth it's about as barren as a desert. The daily damage to shores and rivers are magnitudes more damaging to life than deep sea mining at 3000 meters of the entire world would be.

@Likeaworm

5 күн бұрын

@@ConstantChaos1barely any life* cope harder greeny

@ConstantChaos1

5 күн бұрын

@@Likeaworm that's not correct my guy, its home to some of largest densities of biodiversity in the world. Obviously you are one of those who suffer from a lack of knowledge on this subject, which makes my point for me, thanks. Idk why you're being so agro but you should step outside for a bit lmfao.

@subcitizen2012

5 күн бұрын

🧐

I’m no environmentalist,but I like to keep an open mind. Even to me, the implications of dredging the sea floor has huge implications to the ocean & surrounding areas. There’s huge amounts of undisturbed silts with harmful bacteria/gases trapped beneath. I believe De beers diamond have designing a huge mechanical horizontal dredger that lifts around 60 tons an hour of silt, washes it on board a ship, then simply dumps it back into the sea without any consideration to the environment. I’m thinking similar to the methane pockets bring released by melting permafrost?

3:00 Calling David Attenborough a scientist is dragging it a bit far, isn’t it?

@dantetre

5 күн бұрын

Don't forget Oliver is not native English speaker. In many languages biologist, natural historian is also a natural scientist that can be shortened to scientist.

@humanearthling1847

5 күн бұрын

what is a scientist then? he studied, he make experimants, he observes stuff, he built hypothesises (no native english sry). i belive he is one, even a very good one.

@user-bx5yl4rt8m

5 күн бұрын

​@@humanearthling1847He does none of those things. He's an overpaid narrator who travels on a private jet.

@SverreMunthe

5 күн бұрын

@@TheRealObi-wanKenobi Did he study biology at university? Did he take a masters or a PhD? I studied physics at college. Well I studied electronics, but it’s part of physics. So I guess I’m a scientist as well. The man was a TV producer who went over to nature programs. That’s it. He never studied shit at a level where I would call him a scientist.

why does this reminder me of the Glomar Explorer that raised a Soviet ballistic missile sub. Is there a Russian sub or new Missile on the sea floor there

What about mining for minerals under the seafloor?

Mine them, im tired of autocrats monopolizing rare earth minerals

greed gonna f it up like always

somebody gotta do it first so we might as well do it as we have some standards in place😎

Asteroid mining wen

oh that mine

No way they collecting the subnautica mineral nodules

If somebody would come up with the idea of mining only in the 21st century with this kind of anti progress ideology we have now they would not let it go ahead also and we would never have had all the amazing things that mining brought us. Go Norway!

It is a trial tho. Basically a large scale science project. Not saying I support it, I find it strange our government didnt reconsider or give it a second thought after the backlash. However, this is barely even reported in Norway. But the reality is, we do not know what effect it has. Some say it will have huge effect. Some say it won't.

It’s an efficient way forward ♻️ 🔋⚡️

China does not have the majority of the rare earth minerals. They just have the majority of mines developed to extract them and that is changing rapidly. Rare earth minerals are not actually rare at all. they are all over the planet especially near the Rocky mountains of the US.

@freedomfighter22222

2 күн бұрын

People just don't know that for a resource to be classified as a "reserve" it needs to be economically viable to extract it, Meaning as long as China dump it out for pennies nobody else technically have large "reserves" despite there being plenty of known locations of rare earths that could be exploited if it was necessary or the price of the product rose a bit.

Isn't there a fuckton of World War war 2 bombs in that area😂😮

@blackkissi

5 күн бұрын

plenty of metals to reuse there :)

@subcitizen2012

5 күн бұрын

🤔

@sakakaka4064

4 күн бұрын

I wish

@freedomfighter22222

2 күн бұрын

No? why would there be a large amount of those in the middle of the ocean far from main shipping lines? There was hardly any action in that area at all. At worst a few depth charges or torpedoes were used there but even if they failed to detonate they would implode from the pressure at that depth long before they reached the sea bed

Go mine the Moon...is my vote. Ocean's overly stressed already imo.

@SerpentNED

5 күн бұрын

How would you do that logistically? Rockets can only ship a little ore per launch as metals tend to be quite heavy! That is a big problem... And also the costs per launch, the rocket needs to have enough fuel to go to the moon, but also enough to go back and land safely on earth.

@Essex121514

4 күн бұрын

I agree the sea floors are under A LOT of pressure. *Ba dum tsss

Where I already heard this Voice?

I have a question for the creators of this content: What is the purpose of the loud and extremely annoying background noise (muzack) that makes it hard to hear what the narrator is saying?

I'm not sure whether Cobalt is as necessary for the future of EV and stationary batteries as said here (around timecode 5:50). Most new batteries these days are Cobalt free, and this will become more so as we transition towards other chemistries like sodium instead of lithium. Therefore this mining is simply not as important for technological advancement as asserted, the only motive I can make out is pure short-term profit.

I have a feeling the enviromental impacts can be mitigated by good practices, and that they will be reduced compared with land-based mining. Hope we can start doing it, my Portugal has a great opportunity to be a major player in deep sea mining

@nickvangeel

5 күн бұрын

Has any company ever, in the history of the Earth, ever started their exploitation with good practices implemented or even considered ?

@ilpi7216

5 күн бұрын

The deepsea miners themselves will probably wreak havoc and leave barren sand behind them. There's no way it will be ethical

And the seas turned to blood

@subcitizen2012

5 күн бұрын

Nice

Deep see mining is the best ❤❤❤

5:53 looks like the biggest artificial island

This is like clear cutting with napalm. It won't grow back. The tailings that extends down stream on land for miles will expand 3 dimensionally underwater. Nothing says base of the food pyramid than expanse of the sea floor

Lets go! Norway is going to be the riches country

Biodiversity vs human bank account.

@aguspuig6615

Күн бұрын

yeah thats the only reason we mine

@parksto

Күн бұрын

@@aguspuig6615 i don't speak about mining. your answer seems out of context

i think it needs to be done , but we should have the scientific comunity keep a close eye of it

The ISA moved to formulate requests to be paid “royalties”(?!) from mining. Yeah, I would request that too. Pay me, so I can regulate you!

Given civilization's mad thirst for minerals, and externalizations are allowed, it is the obvious progression

Not gonna lie, I thought this video is about Norway using naval mines to deter Russia.

How about a comprimise. Dont use a vaccum sucking up and destroying everything but mandate some AI driven set or arms actually only picking up the small clumps of minerals?

No wonder 😂

No. These underwater mines are safer! The big corporations… they are trying to keep precious metals for themselves. I feel as tho this is a huge step in the right direction. We need to put more power in the people’s hands. This should do that. More resources for sll

We are fucked when they start seabed mining

Refuse to use ocean floor mining bit children labor is ok 😂

They're all against because it's not their profit

This is why recycling minerals is extremely important. The more that we can recycle the minerals and rare earths needed to make EV batteries, and storage batteries for wind and solar power, the less we will need to mine on land or the oceans.

Do we really need more resources from earth there is lots but there’s more resources out there in the solar system, asteroids moons, and other rocky planets with the same resources they talk about it would probably be more expensive than going to the ocean, but really we need to work on keeping our planet living so space, exploration and mining of space resources is much better for preservation of earth and we could find much more rare resources than are on earth there’s definitely other resources out there on these asteroids and also the moon has vital resources so we start off with mining the moon and asteroids and then move bigger and greater things

I think you've really buring the lead on how detrimental this will be for the undersea environment. You should really watch Last Week Tonight's episode on deep sea mining, did it not long ago too. Talks much about the very present dangers of the practice and how the seabed authority has conflicting interests in itself. What I don't understand is why we simply aren't putting all of our resources into sodium batteries. It's so plentiful and can be the key to everything.

will Portugal's enormous to be approved EEZ have any interesting minerals in its deep sea bed?

Are you talking in a box?

I vaguely remember a article in a popular science magazine from the 70's about deep sea mining. Which was 50 years ago. And the technology still isn't here. It's like nuclear fusion, it's always 30 years from now before it actually works.

Let her know that shes gorgeous please

Proud to be Norwegian

@bennyklabarpan7002

5 күн бұрын

Proud servant of Washington. Norway has been a good vassal to Britain and America for the past centuries. Respect to Norway From Tel'Aviv

ultimately countries will do it and the UN is powerless to stop it. you think china won't invest in this?

Just bring back coal. Simple as

@LasVegar

2 күн бұрын

Why would we bring back the coal power plant on Svalbard

so overfishing, plastic wastes, and industrial effluent was not enough

Norway has opened for exploration, there is no mine and as far as I know no plans yet. A lot of things concern me more. Like how we litter the country with cabins.

Not sea mines? Thats what nato needs.

will u be mine

This amounts to bulldozing large tracts of the sea floor. I'm sure it will have no effect on the ecosystem with "proper regulations". 😉

@Mosern1977

5 күн бұрын

It will not be "large parts of the seafloor" - the sea-floor is the largest parts of the world. Its like complaining about making a sandbox in Sahara being a problem.

There is already a precedent in Pacific Ocean. The tuna population drops significantly when the surface harvesting is done, the disturbance at that scale already disrupt water quality. In that depth, water flow is not prominent enough to disperse the post-mortem, impacting all marine life that heavily connected to one another without our much understanding. The researchers immediately give it a no go after that. But the company warns that "if we dont do it ourselves, someone will do it anyway." That statement will remain open for self-fulling prophecy. The need for under depth mining is because our so called "green technology". The battery is one of the dirtiest manufacturing we ever done. I know it because the process is so toxic, even my country ppl manages to have a big movement, scaring off any future investors XD They are done by China. And I'm not surprised, the mining will be done by China sooner or later.

p

They’re gonna fuck the ocean up even more with this stuff it’s honestly ridiculous

I'm not suprised Norway is the one that starts this. Norway is very experienced in experimenting with extracting from the sea and has experienced workers that can fill out all the needed proffesions in seabed mining. Norway has also not been that envoirmentally friendly when it come to mining with Norway being one of the few countries that allows companies to dump heavy rocks into the sea. My opinion on it, i think we should do a test run on seabed mining, a lot of observing of the consequences of gains and drawbacks from operations

@freedomfighter22222

2 күн бұрын

The venn diagram of countries that allow dumping mine rock waste into the ocean and the countries with sharp depth changes on their coastline is a perfect circle. The countries that banned that activity are the ones where mine waste was being deposited at 10m depth and got moved around by surface currents. Norway deposits rock from mines at 300m+ depth which doesn't cause remotely close to the same damage as when you deposit it near the surface. In those cases where mines are located immediately near sharp depth changes the depositing of mine waste into the sea does less damage than a surface deposit would. It is all the countries that doesn't have the option to dump rocks at deep depths that banned deposits in the ocean, the countries that banned that activity literally made no difference, they weren't going to do it anyway as shallow water deposits have been proven to not work. Those bans had nothing to do with the environment and just about scoring some cheap points with environmentalist and letting them think they got a win so that those government could push through other policies.

Pretty ironic that in our effort to "go green" we're willing to completely disrupt & destroy the deep sea environment 🤦‍♂️ which i believe will lead to a collapse of oceanic currents.. smh

Prototype it and science the c@#$ out of it. We need to know

@GrannyTheftAuto

5 күн бұрын

Yeah, like mine 100m wide and leave 900m alone before new 100m, then conduct studies before, during and after on the effects on the enviroment. Then we know instead of fearing the unknown.

Omg let’s save the environment by fucking up an environment we know nothing about yaaay!!

Destructive mining on an industrial scale for green energy.. do people not hear this nonsense?

Russia? WHY ELSE??!?!?@?!@

@RobespierreThePoof

4 күн бұрын

Illiterate much?

As a norwegian, this is a shameful decision. Because we've no idea how badly this mining will affect the life down there.

@humanearthling1847

5 күн бұрын

well, there are even lifeforms that exclusivly living on or even in the things they will mine....so there are some clues.

@kingofthend

5 күн бұрын

Eh whatever economy go brrrr

@bennyklabarpan7002

5 күн бұрын

It's not shameful. It's your resource. What is shameful is nations that overpopulate, Norway has an extremely low population density.

@alanv3185

5 күн бұрын

As a Chinese Italian Phillipino Mexican, this is a decision.

@Anirossa

5 күн бұрын

The info we have so far shows its going to be absolutely disasterous.

Couldn't sit through the video due to the annoying background music

You didn't have to title it like that dude i still would have clicked it

Norway to be the first to do it industrially? Bud, Canadas been doing it for 3 years already.

@RonTon89

5 күн бұрын

Source? I'm only finding articles that they aren't, and that they have signed the moratorium on it.

From what I heard seabed mining is much worse than traditional mining.

@freedomfighter22222

2 күн бұрын

You heard people talking about things they know nothing about or you misunderstood them then. Any scientist would tell you we have no fucking clue if it is worse or not which is why they don't advocate for banning mining just for postponing it until we do know whether it is worse or not. People who claim to know anything concrete about the effects of seabed mining are lying, we do not know.