if i am a resident of sabah..i prefer to be part of malaysia since malaysia is rich nation and very less corruption..

@DarkwearGT

20 күн бұрын

malaysia is not richj

@lewisreduta7129

19 күн бұрын

​@@DarkwearGTYes and Philippines is much stronger 💪

@justbox00

18 күн бұрын

​@@DarkwearGT Malaysia rich many Philippines work there

@ryanyeethegifted

17 күн бұрын

I prefer sabah belong to Philippines. Malaysia want sabah as resources supplied to West Malaysia.

@hopelope1703

15 күн бұрын

@@ryanyeethegifted Sulu’s ownership of Sabah can be disputed. Because Brunei Sultanate (original owner) granted North Borneo (Sabah) to BNBC dated 29/12/1877. Much earlier than the 1878 agreement. How can it belong to Sulu if Brunei can give it away? Sulu Sultanate relinquished its territories to the Spanish under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement on 22/7/1878. Sulu has nothing left. Thus the 1878 Sulu-BNBC Agreement dated 22/1/1878 is null and void. The cession of Sabah from Sulu to PH in 1962 is invalid. Try reading what is uti posseditis juris. PH can only claim territories given by the US (PH colonizer) under the Manila Treaty of 1946. No Sabah.

I hope that Malaysia will return Sabah to the Philippines peacefully

@hopelope1703

25 күн бұрын

What is your evidence?

@fear9866

20 күн бұрын

No

@DarkwearGT

20 күн бұрын

Sultanate of sulu is not phillipines

@lewisreduta7129

19 күн бұрын

​@@fear9866nah Philippines is betterrrrrrrr!?!?!?

@ilyaslee1281

9 күн бұрын

What nonsense are you talking, Sabah is part of Malaysia. 🇲🇾💪

Sabah land is original from Philippines 🇵🇭 not Malaysia..

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

Ya. Keep delusion.

@user-sf5ri7qn3y

Ай бұрын

sabah is a state in MALAYsia now..sulu is NOT philippines anyway,period..

@user-mf3pe7sh2v

Ай бұрын

@@user-sf5ri7qn3y War Philippines vs Malaysia noobs army..

@user-mf3pe7sh2v

28 күн бұрын

@@user-sf5ri7qn3y your ignorant people, SABAH PHILIPPINES NOT MALAYSIA, MALAYSIA RENT A LAND OF SULTANATE FROM PHILIPPINES..

@0rangutan-ml1im

20 күн бұрын

Delusional

Support Philippines from Indonesia ❤️🇮🇩🇵🇭

Based on previous territorial dispute cases, if a country has been controlling and governing a territory for decades and had managed it successfully it is entitled to the land. Besides, the native Sabahans have chosen Malaysia. It is the people's right to determine their future. Why would the prosperous Sabahans want a flood of impoverished Filipinos from the south to flood their state and bring crime and the standards of living down? Look at the Taiwan case: Taiwan claimed the Taiping island (the largest island in the South China Seas) as theirs on the basis of having governed and 'lived' on it for decades. Nobody is challenging their claims.

@No_BS_policy

Ай бұрын

Prosperous my ass😂😂😂

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

Don’t even had to go that far. Philippines first has to dissolute and reinstate Sultan of Sulu monarchy as the rightful owner of land and territory of Philippines. Of course, all Pinoy have to convert to Muslim too given following their ruler religion. Philippines were name after King Philip of Spain, whose army defeated and exile Sultan of sulu for all the right.

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

@@No_BS_policySabahan say no to Philippines.

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

@@fernandocruz4877 you might want to read more. The decision were over turn and the judge who made that decision were also found guilty as he has no legal right to made that judgment. And the judge was also found has credibility issue as taking bride etc. so it pretty talk about culprit all gang up behind that ruling. Crooks.

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

@@fernandocruz4877 don’t think so. Check your history book. America never took foot in Sabah at all. Philippines might choose to be US puppet and call US papa. But not Malaysia, no Borneo. So, stop delusion.

If you called it rent, where is the agreement between Sulu and Malaysia? If none, it is just like what pirates and mafia do for a living. Why in the 1878 agreement, was Malaysia not mentioned? Is there any clause in the 1878 agreement that Malaysia has the responsibility to continue paying Sulu? Why do the receipts in Sulu's possession not mention the money is for the rent? Why is the amount so small and not what has been stipulated in the agreement? One Mexican gold dollar (coins) in 1878 weighed 1.7 grams of gold. So, 5300 X 1.7/1000 = 9.01 kg of gold. Compare the value of 5300 Malaysian dollars to 9 kg of gold. Giving away money is not an offense. Can give or stop giving any time.

Marami pilipino nag hanap buhay sa sabah.walang gulo ndi kagaya.sa pinas.marumi pollitika.walang.asenso

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

It's originally from Philippines

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

Show me your evidence.

@IA100KPDT

Ай бұрын

There was no soverign country called Philippines. Its either paying tribute to China, under Spanish, Japanese or US control. What rights do pinoy's have?

@axe6597

Ай бұрын

Bruh, stop this shit, it's cringe!!!

@will4235

Ай бұрын

​@@hopelope1703Evidence is Malaysia is paying the sultanate of Sulu until now and Malaysia supporting the MILF and MNLF so that Philippines Mindanao fight for independence so that Philippines will loss it's claim for Sabah

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

@@will4235 If you called it rent, where is the agreement between Sulu and Malaysia? Why in the 1878 agreement, was Malaysia not mentioned as one of the parties? Is there any clause in the 1878 agreement that Malaysia has the responsibility to continue paying Sulu? Why do the receipts in Sulu's possession not mention the money is for the rent? Why is the amount so small in value and not what has been stipulated in the agreement? Why did Malaysia give the money from 1963 until 2013? But the agreement was dated 22/1/1878. When Sulu relinquished its territories and dependencies to Spain on 22/7/1878, it left Sulu with nothing. That 1878 Sulu-BNBC agreement automatically became invalid as Sulu lost its ownership. Why must we pay when Sulu is no longer the owner? Why did Sulu never complain about Malaysia not adhering to the above agreement? In 2013, when Malaysia stopped giving the money, why did Sulu never bring the matter to court? Giving away money is not an offense. Can give or stop giving any time Regarding your accusation that Malaysia supports MILF and MNLF, where is your evidence? Why not PH make a complaint to the UN?

Sabah is part of the Sultanate of Sulu

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

So is Philippines current land one time ago, so dissolution Philippines as a country first, then reinstate Sultan of Sulu monarchy and etc. before any claim to Sabah.

@mohdnoorazli7998

Ай бұрын

then why Philippines not take care properly on mindanao island? so many terrorist inhabitant on mindanao. in the eyes of philipines government i think sultan of sulu also label as terrorist. because sultan of sulu is islam while Philippines government are christian. simple analogy, your house is dirty, you see neighbour house so clean, so you jealous on neighbour house.. that why you wanna claiming it...

@brandenburg2388

Ай бұрын

The Sultanate has long been abolished, so this claim is ridiculous.

@user-sf5ri7qn3y

Ай бұрын

was..sulu is not philippines though,PERIOD..

@Lltycoon

Ай бұрын

Mindanao will be free one day.

Sabah will always be part of the land of Filipinos. We will take it back along with all the territory that was taken from us.

Sabah is Philippine teritory they should return it back to us.

@kimeli

Ай бұрын

and if they don't?

@allanyonson7142

Ай бұрын

You want war 😅

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

Delusion.

@MDZR2283

Ай бұрын

pity pinoy

@dann9970

Ай бұрын

​@@seekersoul3439If Sabah really belongs to Malaysia why Malaysian government has an annual payment back then, it means that there just renting Sabah

Sabah is without any doubt belongs to the Philippines.

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

What is your evidence?

@mic030465

Ай бұрын

@@hopelope1703It is already published blind man. kzread.info/dash/bejne/qJ2I3KiiqtG-iKg.htmlsi=qS76qONspEeM8YfE

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

@@mic030465 ha ha ha ha ha. From KZread? Ha ha ha ha ha ha. There is a court case recorded in 2001 by ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) about the Philippines' claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ that was published in 2001 and is easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply with Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, the Philippines stated the objectives for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely, to safeguard and preserve the Philippines' historical and legal rights (only found in the 1973 PH Constitution) over North Borneo and to inform the court of the effect or effect of the court outcomes of the trial on its claim to the territories. In that trial, Philippines lawyers explained their case especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement (primal reference) and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83). The same 15 main court judges were sitting at the bench and Malaysian and Indonesian lawyers too were present. On 23 October 2001, by a 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippine's request on the ground that there is “no interest of legal nature” (Section 93). (Meaning Sulu/PH claim on Sabah is null and void) Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001 Notice the PH objectives in the intervention, its primal reference, and the judge’s verdict.

@user-sf5ri7qn3y

Ай бұрын

who said??GOD??philippines is NOT sulu ok

@mic030465

Ай бұрын

@@user-sf5ri7qn3y Ha!? Your brain is missing. Go find it first. 😅

Indonesia will support philippine

@Lltycoon

Ай бұрын

@@BocahGendeng90 Indonesia should support Mindanao. Indonesia is a former colonial territory, while Mindanao is still colonized by Philippine. You should know the feeling of being colonized

@Lltycoon

Ай бұрын

@@fernandocruz4877 Mindanao was never under philipoor. We were forced to be apart of philipoor. We were never colonized by King Philip army, so why should we be part of Philip poor?

@Lltycoon

Ай бұрын

@@fernandocruz4877 moro never submit to colonizer like pinoy. We never accept colonizer name on our country unlike you. We are rich with oil but the descendants of colonizer is robbing us. The descendants of colonizer are proud of King Philip so they named their country philipoor. Once a colonizer always a colonizer. Mindanao will be free from philipoor one day

@rohaizadrosli2739

Ай бұрын

Who care malaysia can fight both

@colinchia5318

Ай бұрын

@@fernandocruz4877 correction:Who is poor?

Mindanao will be free from Philipoor. We will never submit to King Philip people. Insyaa Allah.

@gogofmagog2382

21 күн бұрын

@@Lltycoon Malaysia is a name given by Philippine President Manuel Quezon in WW2, you were never a country until 1960s, you can always go back on not being a country, no wonder Singapore was taken away from you very easily.

Philippines not preparing war against Malaysia no need to prepare war we have a tribunal court to decide where Sabah belongs to,I think we will win in the court.

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

There is a court case recorded in 2001 by ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) about the Philippines' claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ that was published in 2001 and is easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply with Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, the Philippines stated the objectives for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely, to safeguard and preserve the Philippines' historical and legal rights (only found in the 1973 PH Constitution) over North Borneo and to inform the court of the effect or effect of the court outcomes of the trial on its claim to the territories. In that trial, Philippines lawyers explained their case especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement (primal reference) and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83). The same 15 main court judges were sitting at the bench and Malaysian and Indonesian lawyers too were present. On 23 October 2001, by a 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippine's request on the ground that there is “no interest of legal nature” (Section 93). (Meaning Sulu/PH claim on Sabah is null and void) Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001 Notice the PH objectives in the intervention, its primal reference, and the judge’s verdict.

@AzzrudinJamil

Ай бұрын

Bro's been living under a rock and haven't heard the latest news. 😅

@hitthedeck4115

Ай бұрын

The decisions of any international court are non-binding since there's no body above countries (no world government) which can enforce it. Hence, it comes back to the Philippines and Malaysia to resolve any lingering issue about their territorial claims.

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

​@@hitthedeck4115Go and read about ICJ.

@vincentkuah2525

20 күн бұрын

Not necessary to go to court. Case decided by ""world court" will be definitely go to Philippines. Reason: Malaysia is NOT a vassal of USA. Unlike the Philippines.

I'm Filipino but I'm pretty sure the people on Sabah doesn't want to become a Philippine territory, and also the ones saying sabah is originally Filipino, are people who are "little" to prideful, and no offense it's cringe.

@hiidenwarrior2698

Ай бұрын

Hindi mga tao ang nagsasabi kanino ang lupain United Nations!

@kuroshiro2396

28 күн бұрын

FYI even Brunei's the original owner of Sabah reject Sulu claim over Sabah.. 🤦🏻‍♀️

@hiidenwarrior2698

28 күн бұрын

@@kuroshiro2396 It is not the whoever says what! Idiot! its the court in UN!

@hiidenwarrior2698

28 күн бұрын

Isa ka ring mang mang! Pag may naghain ng Kaso sa korte! Korte and magsasabi!

Only Philippines have the right to claim under treaty of paris 1898 Treaty of WASHINGTON 1900 so we challenge all argue

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

Delusion 😂😂😂.

@dann9970

Ай бұрын

Malaysia is just renting Sabah back then but they stop the annual payment, the Malaysian government knows it.​@@seekersoul3439

@dann9970

Ай бұрын

Malaysia is just renting Sabah back then but they stop the annual payment, the Malaysian government knows it.​@@seekersoul3439

@viobenebeltran104

Ай бұрын

​@@seekersoul3439 that is true no argue about that treaty

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

@@viobenebeltran104 delusion. Please keep on for that. Sabah is part of Malaysia. Before, now and future. Malaysia we are country that we are equal to any country in the world. We don’t call US papa, so you can bring up Spain, France or US, bottom line is they has to respect Malaysia sovereignty, and we are no begger to them. We make our decision for the country and don’t ask for other to donate. So Philippines can continue delusion. Any demand of Sabah from Philippines mean that Philippine has to give back all the land currently Philippine seat at to Sultan Sulu first. Remember Sultan sulu kingdom is at Philippines. Not Malaysia.

Philippines have stations maids everywhere. One day,they will claim as their territories

@nhoyxpcarilla4716

Ай бұрын

.!.

1963 when sabah and sarawak join peninsula malaya to form Malaysia why no objection from Philippines.

@braderjunot

Ай бұрын

There is a Manila agreement.. There is Indonesia Malaysia and the Philippines, but Malaysia betrayed the Manila agreement. Check again, don't be a fool!

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

@@braderjunot Ha ha ha ha ha. Read Article 10 in the Manila Accord 1963. Indonesia, PH, and Malaysia agreed to let the UN determine the aspirations of the people in Sabah and Sarawak. When the result was announced by the UN Secretary-General, Indonesia and PH protested. PH broke diplomatic ties and Indonesia went into a confrontational approach toward Malaysia. Now is the betrayal?

@braderjunot

Ай бұрын

@hopelope1703, the leaders of Sabah and Sarawak have been bribed by the leaders of the Malay peninsula, the people of Sabah and Sarawak are not involved at all. If the people were involved, they would certainly choose independence, choose to stand alone as a sovereign country. Until now, Indonesia and the Philippines are very cautious in building cooperation with the Malay peninsula. Traitors will always remain traitors.

@down2despair

Ай бұрын

actually only the sulu sultanate have a claim on sabah, the government of the Philippines only support their claims.

@Jhance05™

Ай бұрын

WE HAVE AGREEMENT BUT YOUR COUNTRY BETRAYED THE PHILIPPINES YOU DONT THAT??. SO YOUR INFORMTION ABOUT SABAH ONLY A LITTLE BIT BUT THAT SABAH IS PART OF OUR HISTORY EVEN IN SHOOL. WE LEARN THAT.. YOUR MALAYSIA IS TRAITOR. YOU DONT KNOW THE malaysian before betrayed the philippines but your government dont tell about that??. Hahaha

yes sabah belong to philippines by historical claim by sultan of sulu

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

Delusion. How come Philippines suddenly become Sultan Sulu ? So now Philippine is a Muslim country

@user-dd7pc9hg4v

Ай бұрын

Bawiin ang sabah, malaking pakinabang yan para sa atin lalo na ang naghihirap ng mga kapatid natin pilipino muslim

@user-vs5le8ct4v

Ай бұрын

bullshitt go to hell​@@user-dd7pc9hg4v

@Boboskoll

Ай бұрын

​@@user-dd7pc9hg4v apa yang berlaku.?

Malaysia makakalaban ninyo ang JOINT ARMY NG AFP AT BIAF,,,,, ILANG DEKADA NA KAYONG NAKINABANG!!!😊

@bossnandi

29 күн бұрын

also milf and mnlf

Malaysia you shame not your own Saba belong the ceran sultan family belongs the Filipino

@kimeli

Ай бұрын

what? can somebody explain what he is trying to say.

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

Shame on you don’t know your history. You are not Filipino but citizen and servant to the Sulu Sultan. Philippines were name after king Philip who is king of Spain. So please dissolute Philippine as the country first and reinstate Sulu Sultan monarchy as the rightful owner of all the land of Philippines and server you Sultan. Ans perhaps convert to Muslim too. May be I can suggest a few Muslim name for you.

@mohdnoorazli7998

Ай бұрын

PH should very shame, not developing mindanao with many insurgent dissatisfies against Philippines.. eg Abu Sayyaf.. yet Philipines with no shame still wanna claim Sabah that own by another country.. I cannot get how PH thinking?

@mohdnoorazli7998

Ай бұрын

@@fernandocruz4877 The heirs Sultan of Sulu is by my perception similar to terrorist group like Abu Sayyaf.. but why PH Christian like you want to support him (sulu)?? besides do you ever thinking how absurd for Sabahan (3.5 million people) to give their land hand over to terrorist?? Come Sabah ask Sabahan local here I bet if true Sabahan either want to stay with Malaysia or being independent.. BUT to become a part of Sulu or Philippines is a big NO! FACT!

@user-sf5ri7qn3y

Ай бұрын

sabah is a state in MALAYsia..sulu is NOT philippines,period..

They will fight in the court and traitor will be known.

@tonimaraya3236

Ай бұрын

British is the traitor.

with Lahad Datu Accident, Sabah will naver forgive what they have done. Claims as many as they wanted . that the fact . respect others and others shall respect you, peace yo.

@bakhtiarabdulrahim6794

14 күн бұрын

Setuju, kali ini sesiapa saja yang cuba menceroboh Sabah lagi macam tahun 2013 musti terus dihantar ke alam baqa, yang lari lintang pukang balik sana hari tu pun harap nasib saja

everyone know sabah belong to philipines ..Malaysia rent the land from suluk sultan and forget to pay.. they have agreement while and black..

@kimeli

Ай бұрын

everyone knows? as in the whole world?

@cheesecake321-n6w

Ай бұрын

lol dont forget to bring your passport if u want to visit sabah! Use the slow lane too for the foreigners hahahaha

@jojodaloguin

Ай бұрын

​@@cheesecake321-n6w yes because malaysia seems like israel

@matfaizin6546

Ай бұрын

Sabah wants to rule its own country and does not support any country between the Philippines, Malaysia or Indonesia 🤣🤣🤣

@azharkamarudin-oj9zi

Ай бұрын

lol philipines consider sulu sultanate a terrorist before and denied if theres any sulu sultanate. then suddenly because of money involve hur durr sultanate of sulu is recognise lol.

Panahon na upang bawihin lahat na teritoryo ng Pilipinas napunta sa ibang bansa.

@seekersoul3439

Ай бұрын

😂 then please return Philippines to sultan of Sulu first.

@eddta7549

Ай бұрын

@@seekersoul3439 isipin mo PBBM pag asa mabawi ang iyong saging, hehehe

@0rangutan-ml1im

20 күн бұрын

​@@eddta7549what?

if malaysia attacks philippines the mutual defense treaty with america will be triggered

@michaelsalano5879

Ай бұрын

R.I.P Malaysia if that happened.

@TarunaDesa

Ай бұрын

FPDA take over to defend Malaysia..

@Bruh-zc3qs

Ай бұрын

Who would win. Philippines,USA, South Korea and Japan (Would consider to join as Malaysia is one of country where Japan invest heavily), Taiwan VS Malaysia,UK,New Zealand, Australia, Singapore, Indonesia(Malaysia Cousin), China(any chance to mess with US),Russia(same reason as China)

@AdamNakMilo

Ай бұрын

Us attack Malaysia?, meanwhile in Sabah us army and Malaysia training army

@Muscleman-You-know-who-else

21 күн бұрын

No if cause it will never happen. But Philippines definitely attacked Malaysia, Lahad Datu incident. Pinoys fcked around and found out

Agreement signed between Kiram and British North Borneo Company, Philippines stated in that agreement? We cant find the word Philippines there...the word Philippines lose somewhere....u see lose...

mindanao will be freed from the philippines not sabah becoming part of philippines

I would say YES. It belongs to the Philippines. Malaysia took it by obtaining the CONSENT of the RESIDENTS. They should have taken it by obtaining the consent of the owners instead.

@AsiaRevealed This is a very interesting video. 🙂👍 Malaysia is a very respectable country and definitely the crown Jewel of Southeast Asia due and loved by foreigners worldwide for it's very high standard of living, excellent healthcare system, parliamentary form of governance and so on. Their multiracial society consisting of the Malays, Han Chinese and the Brown East Indians are stable but they don't take political correctness too far which is very admirable. The Malays of Malaysia for sure have a right to Sabah. Sabah definitely does not belong to the Filipinos.

@pepitotaloloto8685

Ай бұрын

Kcuf ouy

Just getting it back... 😊

Sabah wants to rule its own country and does not support any country between the Philippines, Malaysia or Indonesia 🤣🤣🤣

@hiidenwarrior2698

Ай бұрын

Then they should fight it out in UN court!

The original owner of Sabah is Brunei. He was the first Sultan ever to rule Sabah.

Mindanao should join Malaysia soon... 😊

Obviously it’s belongs to the Philippines by right

@hopelope1703

22 күн бұрын

Sulu’s ownership of Sabah can be disputed. Because Brunei Sultanate (original owner) granted North Borneo (Sabah) to BNBC dated 29/12/1877. Much earlier than the 1878 agreement. How can it belong to Sulu if Brunei can give it away? Sulu Sultanate relinquished its territories to the Spanish under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement on 22/7/1878. Sulu has nothing left. Thus the 1878 Sulu-BNBC Agreement dated 22/1/1878 is null and void. The cession of Sabah from Sulu to PH in 1962 is invalid.

we love you malaysia.. from sabah philippines

Actually Philippine should also try to claim some part of N. Korea. Pyongyang looks attractive.

@dann9970

Ай бұрын

If Sabah really belongs to Malaysia, why there is an annual payment so it means that Malaysia is just renting Sabah. But nowadays the government of Malaysia stop the annual payment.

@johnliew3437

Ай бұрын

@@dann9970 Adverse possession.

@yangyang7230

Ай бұрын

Sulu visited Hong Kong n Taiwan, too. Maybe this 2 island also belongs to the Philippines.

@johnliew3437

Ай бұрын

@@yangyang7230 They dare not try Kim Jong Un because he is very fierce.

@geminivega2219

Ай бұрын

no because the Philippines has no Historical rights in north korea

Bring it on.The Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) is to select a squadron of 18 Sukhoi Su-57E Felon fifth-generation stealth fighter as its next Multirole Combat Aircraft (MRCA).

@cherubimcherubim9515

Ай бұрын

@@fernandocruz4877 u must be dream imperial america will fight for Philippines. Lol

@franciscogozo2229

Ай бұрын

Malaydesh is nothing compared to Philippines in terms of military equipment

@cherubimcherubim9515

Ай бұрын

@@franciscogozo2229 Philippines military equipments is mostly given second hand junks. Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) is confident the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) will acquire another batch of 18 units of FA-50M combat aircraft, bringing the total number of the fighter aircraft it will possess to 36 units.

@franciscogozo2229

Ай бұрын

@@cherubimcherubim9515 mostly malaydesh equipment also old and no experience for the battle hahaha malaydesh losers at all

@AkmalHaziq-ib2zq

Ай бұрын

@@cherubimcherubim9515u have a kampung mind , still thing us is the daddy of everything

Mindanao belongs to Malaysia

As a Malaysian Chinese I don't think i have ever heard of this in my country Malaysia but I hopefully hope Malaysia,China and Philippines don't went to war 🇨🇳❤🇲🇾❤️🇵🇭

Sabah can be taken back to the Philippines while the country was weponized by global countries

Sabah originally belongs to the Philippines. But over a long period of time, Malaysia have took control and develop it. Yes I am a Filipino and no offense to my fellow countrymen. Since Malaysia and the Philippines are both democracies, let the people of Sabah decide!

Fight Philippines Ang Malaysia is the only one solution for this problem

Sabbah is philippine territory not in malaysia

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

Show me your evidence.

@Bruh-zc3qs

Ай бұрын

My 10 years old brother has better English than you.

Sabah obviously belongs to malaysia no sea in between philippine is so far away from sabah with a sea seoerate in between , FXxx philippine also wants to claim usa , uk , japan , korea too

@hiidenwarrior2698

Ай бұрын

No SEEE English barok!

Sabah is Belong to Philippines.

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

What is your evidence?

@brandenburg2388

Ай бұрын

This is the equivalent of saying Luzon belongs to Malaysia....

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

@@brandenburg2388 Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

@af5411

Ай бұрын

You even can't feed you own people😂

@heavenheaven6312

Ай бұрын

Mindanao hopes to be Malaysia soon.... 😊

Bawiin ang sabah, malaking pakinabang yan para sa atin lalo na ang naghihirap ng mga kapatid natin pilipino muslim

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

What is your evidence?

@axizcorp

Ай бұрын

tanong mo muna sa mga Pilipinong nakatira sa Sabah kung gusto nila maging parte ng pinas.

@user-dd7pc9hg4v

Ай бұрын

@axizcorp illegal migrant nga tawag ng mga Malaysia sa mga pilipino sa sabah, Inaaresto ang mga kawawa pilipino doon,

@ebola_virus1966

Ай бұрын

I am a filipino, and I really think that the sabah people are the only one's who has the right to choose. I love malaysian, I actually visit there once and the people are very nice very look alike to filipinos. I hope we can resolve this in a peaceful manner.

@ednaramos9134

Ай бұрын

Tagal na aku dito sa sabah peaceful country ganda ang patakaran sa governo dito best ang malysia 👍♥️

Philippines now vs china and Malaysia?

Iam sure behind to all of this both sabah and spratly island is Chinese business man because there are to many Chinese malaysian in Malaysia

@Bruh-zc3qs

Ай бұрын

Chinese Malaysian. Not China Chinese

Welcome back, Sabah. Love, Republic of the Philippines 😘

@0rangutan-ml1im

20 күн бұрын

😑

SARAWAK AND SABAH -SEPARATE- FROM THE FEDERATION….. FEDERATION WAS JUST A WORD FOR MALAYSIA TO TAKE YOUR RESOURCES. THATS WHY ALL THE AIR FORCE AND MILITARY IS ALL THE WAY OVER THERE IN MALAYSIA WHERE THE RICH PEOPLE ARE WHILE YOU WORK HARD FOR THEM.

@AzzrudinJamil

Ай бұрын

Just wondering, do people need to read it loudly in their head if you type in all caps?

@oneksalami7791

Ай бұрын

@@AzzrudinJamil That’s what she said.😂 What ever tickles your pickle😂

Sabah is owned by Sabah not Malaysia. Sabah (and Serawak) join Malaysia as State. So if Sabah decide to leave Malaysia it will be an Independent state and will not join phillipine.

Malaysia will be erased from the map. Sarawak will be taken to Indonesia. Sabah to the Philippines.

@hopelope1703

13 күн бұрын

Ha ha ha ha ha. You can keep on dreaming

Philippine and malaysia conflict will bring to the arbitration court they will easy to solve if what is the decision of the court Philippines will respect and follow not unlike CHINA ... Philippines and malaysia is brothers they will not go war ....i love malaysia people we have co worker malayusa. In singapore they very kind and friendly same as Filipino .....from Philippines

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

There is a court case recorded in 2001 by ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) about the Philippines' claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ that was published in 2001 and is easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply with Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, the Philippines stated the objectives for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely, to safeguard and preserve the Philippines' historical and legal rights (only found in the 1973 PH Constitution) over North Borneo and to inform the court of the effect or effect of the court outcomes of the trial on its claim to the territories. In that trial, Philippines lawyers explained their case especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement (primal reference) and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83). The same 15 main court judges were sitting at the bench and Malaysian and Indonesian lawyers too were present. On 23 October 2001, by a 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippine's request on the ground that there is “no interest of legal nature” (Section 93). (Meaning Sulu/PH claim on Sabah is null and void) Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001 Notice the PH objectives in the intervention, its primal reference, and the verdict by the court.

Support Philippines Army and peoples 💪🇵🇭

Why malaysian paying rent ? It means its not youra

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

If you called it rent, where is the agreement between Sulu and Malaysia? Why in the 1878 agreement, was Malaysia not mentioned as one of the parties? Is there any clause in the 1878 agreement that Malaysia has the responsibility to continue paying Sulu? Why do the receipts in Sulu's possession not mention the money is for the rent? Why is the amount so small in value and not what has been stipulated in the agreement? Why did Malaysia give the money from 1963 until 2013? But the agreement was dated 22/1/1878. When Sulu relinquished its territories and dependencies to Spain on 22/7/1878, it left Sulu with nothing. That 1878 Sulu-BNBC agreement automatically became invalid as Sulu lost its ownership. Why must we pay when Sulu is no longer the owner? Why did Sulu never complain about Malaysia not adhering to the above agreement? In 2013, when Malaysia stopped giving the money, why did Sulu never bring the matter to court? Giving away money is not an offense. Can give or stop giving any time

Sabah is belongs to the Philippines

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

Show me your evidence.

@heavenheaven6312

Ай бұрын

Hoping Mindanao joins Malaysia soon... 😊

@matfaizin6546

Ай бұрын

Sabah wants to rule its own country and does not support any country between the Philippines, Malaysia or Indonesia 🤣🤣🤣

PH is not that Dumb to wage war against Malaysia for Sabah. Let the people of Sabah or sabahans decide their luck in the future which side they will prefer. Let the status quo remain.

I love malaysia..

Wow! If Sabah is belong to Philippine why Phillipine allow Malaysia took it! Why wait 50 years later and claimed this island is our. Phillipine belong to King of Spain thus Phillipine belong to Spain. Phillipine is in Europe not in Asia. Phillipinos in delusion mood of superpower attempt to take away Sabah island from Malaysia. Phillipinos don’t understand what is EEZ. EEZ is a costal sea zone (water boundary or passage) not include any territory sovereignty. Thus , Phillipinos claim of Sabah and Huangyan island of SCS is invalid. Phillipinos must learn the definition of EEZ before making any furious claims.

As a sabahan i want to be my country as an independent country i want to live peaceful life ❤

@Jhance05™

Ай бұрын

yup if the philippines get that sabah. That sabah is part of the philippines but philippines dont have the rights because the owner of sabah is not philippines its sultan of sulu..

@Jhance05™

Ай бұрын

That sabah will become independent country like taiwan.

@HAIKUCAMPOS

Ай бұрын

@@Jhance05™ every country should give a freedom for the rest of us

Why should we opt to fight? Better to go int. Court to settle this bever endng issue.

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

There is a court case recorded in 2001 by ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) about the Philippines' claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ that was published in 2001 and is easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply with Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, the Philippines stated the objectives for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely, to safeguard and preserve the Philippines' historical and legal rights (only found in the 1973 PH Constitution) over North Borneo and to inform the court of the effect or effect of the court outcomes of the trial on its claim to the territories. In that trial, Philippines lawyers explained their case especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement (primal reference) and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83). The same 15 main court judges were sitting at the bench and Malaysian and Indonesian lawyers too were present. On 23 October 2001, by a 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippine's request on the ground that there is “no interest of legal nature” (Section 93). (Meaning Sulu/PH claim on Sabah is null and void) Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001 Notice the PH objectives in the intervention, its primal reference, and the judge’s verdict.

Try to review the history of Sabah first.😮

I have read the history of Sabah , clearly it belongs to the Sultanate of Sulu , Malaysia is just renting Sabah from them but the lease does not include the resources therein which belongs to the Sultanate of Sulu 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

The ownership of Sabah by Sulu can be disputable. Because Brunei Sultanate (original owner) granted North Borneo (Sabah) to BNBC dated 29/12/1877. Much earlier than the 1878 agreement. How can it belong to Sulu if Brunei can give it away? Sulu Sultanate relinquished its territories to the Spanish under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement on 22/7/1878. Sulu has nothing left. Thus the 1878 Sulu-BNBC Agreement dated 22/1/1878 is null and void. The cession of Sabah from Sulu to PH in 1962 is invalid.

Gogogogo AFP chief of staff handa tayo mgs pilipinos lalaban sa malaysia Pra mabawi ng Ng sabah Yan Pag- aari ng pinas..

@Boboskoll

Ай бұрын

Mari la 1 pulau 3 negara malaysia, brunei, indonesia.

Yes Sabah belongs to the Philippines.

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

What is the evidence?

@blaquecat

Ай бұрын

1800 agreement, philippines didnt even exist yo 😂

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

The ownership of Sabah by Sulu can be disputable. Because Brunei Sultanate (original owner) granted North Borneo (Sabah) to BNBC dated 29/12/1877. Much earlier than the 1878 agreement. How can it belong to Sulu if Brunei can give it away? Sulu Sultanate relinquished its territories to the Spanish under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement on 22/7/1878. Sulu has nothing left. Thus the 1878 Sulu-BNBC Agreement dated 22/1/1878 is null and void. The cession of Sabah from Sulu to PH in 1962 is invalid.

Ringgit want to change to peso ? So many people gonna eat pagpag 🤣🤣

@Jhance05™

Ай бұрын

that sabah is have benifits in you because of oil. If you dont get the sabah. What happen to your country???. Ur ringgit will go down then the peso will go up. And you nid to pay 15$b to philippines. For not paying the rent before and now.. what happen to your country? What do you think??.

@Boboskoll

Ай бұрын

​@@Jhance05™ why so desparete.

@Jhance05™

Ай бұрын

@@Boboskoll where not desperate because in the first place sabah is part of the philippines. You are desperate.

@Boboskoll

Ай бұрын

@@Jhance05™ come n get it..

@Jhance05™

Ай бұрын

@@Boboskoll relax.. theres a law we nid to follow. But if we win. Can you follow the law??? You dont have shame on your self. I think you dont follow the rules. Hahah

Hindi pa nga naresolba ang WPS sabah na Naman. Hindi nga mapalayaslayas ang mga singkit nayan.

@richardunica3542

Ай бұрын

Simple lang isang tira dalawa tama

Indonesia all in Philippine ❤

#china #america #military #indopasific #philippines #malaysia #vietnam #thailand #singapore #australia

One at a time.....

No problem to Malaysia claim ,just pay billion of dollar to sultanate of sulo until your assets has gone

@0rangutan-ml1im

20 күн бұрын

😑

Phillipinos are known for claiming territory that isn't theirs... Just look at Scarborough Shoal.. according to Paris Treaty 1898 the territory of phillipines doesn't include Second Thomas Shoal.. and look phillipines map now... So greedy

@nhoyxpcarilla4716

Ай бұрын

.!.

@carlonatividad5056

Ай бұрын

Yeah,But Scarborough wasn't borrowed by the British from us (the Philippines),then given it to a country that doesn't exist until 1959,The Shoal was within our 200 zone, if you buy or rent a stolen house it doesn't mean it's yours....

How do you explain the existence of two agreements related to the ownership of North Borneo (Sabah) namely between Brunei Sultanate & BNBC (29/12/1877) and Sulu & BNBC (22/17/1878)? The only existing agreement involving the Sultanate of Brunei (original owner) is that agreement that Brunei granted and ceded North Borneo to BNBC on 29/12/1877. If the Brunei Sultanate had given North Borneo to Sulu much earlier, his majesty would not have signed that 1877 agreement. The signing confirms North Borneo belongs to Brunei and not Sulu. Why is there no protest from Sulu to Brunei for signing the 1877 agreement? Why was the Sulu & BNBC agreement not signed earlier in 1877 but 3 weeks later (1878) after the signing of the 1877 agreement. The original agreement in Tausug is missing during His Majesty's trip to Singapore, Thus, the validity of Sulu ownership of North Borneo is doubtful. How on earth can Sulu own North Borneo if there is no undisputable proof that the Brunei Sultanate gave it to them earlier? Unless there is a possibility the British had been scammed, deceived, or intimidated by Sulu into signing that 1878 agreement? The first agreement (1877) with the original owner is more valid in court.

@mariosotto9775

Ай бұрын

You don't know the story of Sabah..keep quiet

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

@@mariosotto9775 Ha ha ha ha ha. I challenge you to check it out. NOT HEARSAY

@Boboskoll

Ай бұрын

​@@mariosotto9775 cry baby.

60 years ago the pilipines does not even claim sabah as their teritoral.not asinggle words

Philippines never lose about faith..of holy..ok from God ok! if Malaysia always fight about true..that sabah is give to Philippines..because the truth faith is Philippines nothing else..that's true no doubt.

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

The ownership of Sabah by Sulu can be disputable. Because Brunei Sultanate (original owner) granted North Borneo (Sabah) to BNBC dated 29/12/1877. Much earlier than the 1878 agreement. How can it belong to Sulu if Brunei can give it away? Sulu Sultanate relinquished its territories to the Spanish under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement on 22/7/1878. Sulu has nothing left. Thus the 1878 Sulu-BNBC Agreement dated 22/1/1878 is null and void. The cession of Sabah from Sulu to PH in 1962 is invalid.

Hold referendum then. Let people of Sabah decide. Better still, let Mindanao hold referendum also as Mindanao have high muslim population expressing desire to join Malaysia.

Philippines is not preparing for war, because the Philippines is always ready to engage a war here and abroad most specially for it's territory, And yes sabah north Borneo belong to the Filipino people and the Philippines history subjects used to teach that during the days, but now It doesn't included any more I don't know why

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

@Bruh-zc3qs

Ай бұрын

Sabah is for Sabah. Sabah has greater autonomy than any Philippines state. And I don't think Sabahan want to lose it. Philippines better ask the Sabahan first before claiming, ask them if they want to join Philippines or stay in Malaysia. The answer might be shocking for Filipino. 95% will reject to join Philippines.

this latest move by the Philippines could be viewed as an unexpected collateral outcome in its fight over the Palawan sea with China … the Philippines need to assert their claim thus they put a note to the UN … however if they assert formalnya that their continental shelf line without taking into account Sabah, they would inadvertently recognised that Sabah is not part of the Philippines … its a catch 22 for them … i think their bone is with China and not Malaysia or Vietnam … and perhaps the Philippines have made known this to the Malaysian Foreign Minister during his courtesy visit to Manila … and Malaysia’s response was quite calm to say the least … just a counter note to the UN and some political speeches to the public to divert the masses attention from the local political wrangling …

@asiareveled

14 күн бұрын

The current Philippine administration is doing the bidding of its master, you can clearly see it in their belligerent foreign policy which doesn't benefit the country. Filing a claim of sovereignty at the UN is a PR campaign directed at the local population to divert attention away from internal failures and to please his master.

Sabah , Philippines 🇵🇭🇵🇭

@Hari-fs6th

Ай бұрын

Respect from🇮🇩🇵🇭

Don't talk too much, act directly, if you dare.

Sabah is part of the Philippines under the Sultanate of Sulu.

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

The ownership of Sabah by Sulu can be disputable. Because Brunei Sultanate (original owner) granted North Borneo (Sabah) to BNBC dated 29/12/1877. Much earlier than the 1878 agreement. How can it belong to Sulu if Brunei can give it away? Sulu Sultanate relinquished its territories to the Spanish under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement on 22/7/1878. Sulu has nothing left. Thus the 1878 Sulu-BNBC Agreement dated 22/1/1878 is null and void. The cession of Sabah from Sulu to PH in 1962 is invalid.

Hopefully this will not escalate to a confluct.. Can PH manage.China and Malaysia?

@grerovambrozoyuz9426

Ай бұрын

Whole ASEAN damn it

Magugutom yang Malaysian pag binalik nila ang Sabah sa Sultanate of Sulu heir 😂

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

What is your evidence?

@johndolforbe-vm9sx

Ай бұрын

@@hopelope1703 why your comment is always where's your evidence?is that all you know?where is your evidence?hehe

@hercc6155

Ай бұрын

@@johndolforbe-vm9sxMalaysian was paying rent to hiers of the Sultan for a long time .. niw why they are paying rent if they own Sabah

All Filipino DOMESTICS MAIDS are welcome to works in Sabah as MAIDS not as GROs in night club TELL THIS TO MARCOS

@eduardoquiban947

Ай бұрын

YOU MUST BE THE MAID NOT THE PILIPINOS,, BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE MUCH EDUCATIONS AS PILIPINOS A GIVER AND A HELPFUL COUNTRY.

China support Malaysia!❤

It a part of the philipines by the sulta

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

Where is the evidence?

@GraceJavier-zt3yl

Ай бұрын

@@hopelope1703 it a part of sultanate and its in our history but the british colonist they give it to malasia but malasia keep paying for the rent in the philipine

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

@@GraceJavier-zt3yl Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporated it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Sabah for philippines

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

What is your evidence?

The issue of Sabah's ownership is a complex and contentious matter involving historical, legal, and political dimensions. Here are the key points regarding the claim that Sabah is part of the Philippines and was Philippine territory before the formation of Malaysia in 1963: 1. Historical Context: - The claim that Sabah is part of the Philippines is based on historical events, including the lease of Sabah by the Sultan of Sulu to the British North Borneo Company in the 19th century. The Philippines argues that this lease was not a transfer of sovereignty, and thus, the territory remains part of the Sultanate of Sulu and, by extension, the Philippines. 2. Philippine Claim: - The Philippines claims Sabah based on the historical rights of the Sultanate of Sulu over the territory. The Philippine government has maintained that Sabah is part of the country's territory and has pursued diplomatic and legal avenues to assert this claim. 3. Formation of Malaysia: - Sabah, along with Sarawak, Singapore, and the Federation of Malaya, formed Malaysia in 1963. The inclusion of Sabah in Malaysia was a result of agreements and negotiations between the British, Malayan, and Bornean authorities. 4. Legal Disputes: - The Philippines and Malaysia have had ongoing disputes over the sovereignty of Sabah. The matter has been brought to international forums and courts, although a resolution has not been reached. 5. Current Status: - Sabah is currently part of Malaysia and is known as the Sabah state within the Malaysian federation. It is administered as an autonomous region within Malaysia. In summary, while the claim that Sabah is part of the Philippines has historical roots, the territory is currently under Malaysian sovereignty. The complexities of the historical lease agreements, the formation of Malaysia, and the legal disputes between the Philippines and Malaysia contribute to the ongoing debate over the ownership of Sabah.

@muaffzone3315

28 күн бұрын

What are you miss are Brunei treaty in 1877 that ceased sabah to british. Based on history, what year sulu govern the Sabah? Who are appointed by sulu to govern the sabah? Where Sulu palace in Sabah? You cant find even one. But Brunei are the one that govern Sabah until british came. Brunei soldier that are the one protect sabah sea from pirates. And you want to know who are the pirates in Sabah sea? Sulu people.

Rebels Sulu is get out country crazy claim Sabah. Manila Good Government philippines ❤ Government Malaysia

Yess!

Trust me war wouldnt be happen for sabah because we cant fund proxy war at this rate

Mer.Prisedent Marcos huwag na po sang banggitin ang Sabah ibigay nalang yan sa Malaysia total sila naman ang nagbabayad niyan at kasulukayang sila rin ang nag aalaga nang islang yan malayo naman ang isla sa ating bansa at malapit sa kanila matutugunan nila ang pangangailangan Sabah..

@Mencat_95

Ай бұрын

Itong mga Islam mag rerebelde gusto nila magkaroon ng sariling lupa kaya Sabah ang gusto angkin nila ayaw kasi makisanib sa ibang paniniwala sila lng ang magsisimula sa gulo.. kaya Sana maging matapang ka Mr presedent sa ano Mang Tama.

@Boboskoll

Ай бұрын

​@@Mencat_95 free mindanao

Channel ini hanya nek melaga laga antara negara. Mana rakyat jangan diam

War between Malaysia and Phillipines as said through this video sound like war drum. Sure the said Sultan Sulu is being used as forefront just that.

Let the international law decide on that issues. y waste life that is possible to solve it peacefully..we don't have to copy china..to take disputed teritories by military force like in 1400 centuries that only the strong wins, because no international law still exist

The territory renting with British

Philippines authority have higher chance to take back sabah. Because sabah not independent.

@hopelope1703

Ай бұрын

There is a court case recorded in 2001 by ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) about the Philippines' claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ that was published in 2001 and is easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply with Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, the Philippines stated the objectives for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely, to safeguard and preserve the Philippines' historical and legal rights (only found in the 1973 PH Constitution) over North Borneo and to inform the court of the effect or effect of the court outcomes of the trial on its claim to the territories. In that trial, Philippines lawyers explained their case especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement (primal reference) and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83). The same 15 main court judges were sitting at the bench and Malaysian and Indonesian lawyers too were present. On 23 October 2001, by a 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippine's request on the ground that there is “no interest of legal nature” (Section 93). (Meaning Sulu/PH claim on Sabah is null and void) Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001 Notice the PH objectives in the intervention, its primal reference, and the verdict by the court.