Why Japan lost the Battle of Midway

Has the balance of power ever changed so much in so little time than at the Battle of Midway? In the space of just 5 minutes, American dive bombers scored hits on three Japanese aircraft carriers, dramatically turning the tide of the war in the Pacific.
But this pivotal moment was a product of more than chance. It was the culmination of decisions made not only in the heat of battle but in the preceding weeks and months. To truly grasp the significance of this critical juncture and how it happened, we have to go right back to the beginning of the pacific war.
In this video, IWM curator Adrian Kerrison examines the timeline of events that lead to the Battle of Midway and the crucial decisions that doomed the Japanese to defeat.
Explore and licence the film clips used in this video from IWM Film:
film.iwmcollections.org.uk/co...
A short history of the Pacific War: www.iwm.org.uk/history/a-shor...
What happened at Pearl Harbor?: www.iwm.org.uk/history/what-h...
A guide to Japan's role in WW2: www.iwm.org.uk/history/a-quic...
Follow IWM on social media:
/ i_w_m
/ imperialwarmuseums
/ iwm.london

Пікірлер: 741

  • @joesantamaria5874
    @joesantamaria5874Ай бұрын

    Lest we forget the acts of incredible heroism by the likes of McClusky, Kleiss, Best, and their comrades. Great men all.

  • @kisaragi_san1378

    @kisaragi_san1378

    Ай бұрын

    Thach and George Gay deserve to be named too!

  • @denvan3143

    @denvan3143

    Ай бұрын

    Memorial day 2001 I saw the small turnouts at remembrances of Pearl Harbor and everything that came after that. I was keenly aware that bad things were brewing around the world and that we in the US were in another December 6, 1941, people were hearing, but ignoring the signs of impending disaster. And then 9/11 happened. I was only surprised that it wasn’t worse. When we don’t remember the past events can happen again that remind us rudely of them. Remember Pearl Harbor. Remember 9/11.

  • @edwarddesoignie1194

    @edwarddesoignie1194

    Ай бұрын

    Read the book Broken Sword. It was a combination of events including how Japanese carriers operated and were designed. Great book with lots of researched detail.

  • @danielbond9755

    @danielbond9755

    Ай бұрын

    And don’t forget that the bombers from the Hornet never found their targets, and then more than half couldn’t find their way home.

  • @joesantamaria5874

    @joesantamaria5874

    Ай бұрын

    @@denvan3143 I do remember 9/11. I was a Red Cross volunteer. I remember the smell. I also remember not being surprised, after knowing for years about the Kamikaze. Same hate, different day.

  • @TallDude73
    @TallDude73Ай бұрын

    Just to add, the US torpedo bombers not only drew away and exhausted the Japanese combat air patrol, but more importantly brought the Zeros down to sea level, so they weren't in position to attack the dive bombers at their height before the US planes made their attack dives.

  • @EllieMaes-Grandad

    @EllieMaes-Grandad

    Ай бұрын

    This they did, but at no small cost to themselves.

  • @Rocketsong

    @Rocketsong

    Ай бұрын

    This has long been debunked (See Broken Sword). There was a good 15 minutes between when the last torpedo bomber was shot down and when the dive bombers arrived. The Zeros had plenty of time to climb back to altitude. The CAP was far too small to deal with the number of Dauntlesses that showed up, and they were almost certainly out of ammo for their 20mm cannons, as the zero only held 60 rounds each.

  • @what4hats

    @what4hats

    Ай бұрын

    @Rocketsong they had the time, but their radios had problems. A good design, but not properly shielded or grounded, resulting in the carriers not being able to tell them where the next attack was coming.

  • @Rocketsong

    @Rocketsong

    Ай бұрын

    @@what4hats WWII radios were remarkably bad. But I don't believe the IJN had detection radar at the time.

  • @stevefox7566

    @stevefox7566

    Ай бұрын

    And it was by blind luck that it happened that way.

  • @wassup287
    @wassup287Ай бұрын

    Any hardcore history fans going to mention that Yorktown was still afloat after Hiryu's first counter-attack and its damage repair crews did such a good job putting out the fires that the second attack wave mistook it for an untouched carrier, saving Enterprise and Hornet. Even after the second attack it was STILL afloat, they attempted to salvage it but a submarine finally finished the job.

  • @josephwelch4302

    @josephwelch4302

    21 күн бұрын

    Truth

  • @darin271

    @darin271

    3 күн бұрын

    To be honest, all of the Japanese carriers survived as well. While none of them could conduct air operations because their flight decks were destroyed, they stayed afloat as they burned to water line. In fact, Akagi was under her own power and making 10 knots. She had only been hit by a single bomb. Yamamoto had them all shuttled because he thought the US forces would pursue and capture. Of course, that didn't happen.

  • @johnvan6082
    @johnvan6082Ай бұрын

    One thing that is over looked in most videos about Midway is that it wasn't so much the loss of the four aircraft carriers , but the loss of the pilots and aircrew . Later in the war Japan was able to build new carriers but was never able to replace the highly skilled veteran aircrew . What replacements that were put aboard were easily shot down .

  • @hithere7382

    @hithere7382

    Ай бұрын

    Japan used their aces until they died instead of the American method of rotating them back to the World to train the next squadrons.

  • @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-

    @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-

    Ай бұрын

    @@hithere7382 The luftwaffe were the same they did not rotate their pilots enough times, but the British and Americans had a superior system in place compared to the Axis powers who just wasted all of their veteran air men.

  • @legoeasycompany

    @legoeasycompany

    Ай бұрын

    Except they barely lost 150 pilots and aircrew when the IJN naval air arm had over 2000 pilots in 1941. They'd lose over 3 times more in the meat grinder of the Solomons, more important loses were the loss of mechanics and flight deck personnel who couldn't easily be replaced.

  • @Nugs387

    @Nugs387

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@legoeasycompany I see someone's read Shattered Sword! o7

  • @legoeasycompany

    @legoeasycompany

    Ай бұрын

    @@Nugs387 its a great book

  • @dx1450
    @dx1450Ай бұрын

    When I was a kid we had a neighbor who was personally responsible for the loss of 26 Japanese aircraft in WWII. He was the worst mechanic in the Japanese military.

  • @garydixon6947

    @garydixon6947

    25 күн бұрын

    🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @senorpepper3405

    @senorpepper3405

    16 күн бұрын

    Oldest joke in the book

  • @joem1102

    @joem1102

    19 сағат бұрын

    😂😂😂😂😂

  • @footballtbone
    @footballtboneАй бұрын

    God bless these men. And let us never forget the their sacrifices....we owe these men everything.

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    It's why Communist China is the world superpower.

  • @the-trustees

    @the-trustees

    12 күн бұрын

    You religious losers ruin everything. It was the PEOPLE who succeeded at Midway, not your lame, pretend god character. You soil their efforts and their memories.

  • @MichaelOliver-ry7fj

    @MichaelOliver-ry7fj

    Күн бұрын

    *#IronicHowAmericansForget.

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Күн бұрын

    @@MichaelOliver-ry7fj The US was on the wrong side.

  • @the-trustees

    @the-trustees

    Күн бұрын

    ​@@MarkHarrison733What is that supposed to mean?

  • @tim71pos
    @tim71posАй бұрын

    Let's not forget Roosevelt. He pushed to start building those carriers in the late thirties.

  • @timothy4664

    @timothy4664

    Ай бұрын

    He also had the help of Willis Ching Lee. Lee was in Washington helping to prepare the navy for war. The bureau of ordinance was a bottleneck on new equipment, weapons. They were sitting on radar thinking it wasn't going to be effective. Lee basically pushed it through and ordered it on every vessel. The navy was building a new class of heavy battle cruiser, the Alaska class. The navy built two. Lee pressed to put in end to the project and to build more aircraft carriers instead knowing the aircraft carrier would be crucial to the war.

  • @playerzedra6590
    @playerzedra6590Ай бұрын

    The Japanese planes did not finish off the USS Yorktown, but it was a japanese submarine that did. She was able to stay afloat after being bombed by the japanese. She was, then, being pulled by one of her allied ships, but was hit by a torpedo attack.

  • @TallDude73

    @TallDude73

    Ай бұрын

    That was anti-climactic ... to survive two huge battles (both barely) and then to be torpedoed by a lowly sub lurking in the shadows.

  • @frankiefierro7129

    @frankiefierro7129

    Ай бұрын

    She still might have survived the hit, except the Hammon, which was tied next to her providing electricity for the work crews, had her depth charges explode after taking the torpedo hit.

  • @contumelious-8440

    @contumelious-8440

    Ай бұрын

    @@TallDude73 Your low opinion of submarines is why every submariner here is grinning ear to ear and hoping that you have command of the enemy's next ship.

  • @captainclone1367

    @captainclone1367

    Ай бұрын

    The Yorktown class CV was one tough SOB!!

  • @paulhicks6667

    @paulhicks6667

    Ай бұрын

    “Lowly sub”, you mean the weapon that came close to winning the European war for Germany, and strangled the Japanese war effort by sinking almost their entire merchant fleet?

  • @brianhourigan4472
    @brianhourigan4472Ай бұрын

    Wade McClusky, from Buffalo, NY, made a gutsy call that allowed it all to happen.

  • @PlateletRichGel

    @PlateletRichGel

    24 күн бұрын

    It was the sub attacking that won Midway.

  • @maureencora1

    @maureencora1

    7 күн бұрын

    He Should Got the CMH. Did Y'all See That Scene in 1976 "Midway"?

  • @Stilicho19801
    @Stilicho19801Ай бұрын

    This is the best (and briefest) explanation of the Battle of Midway of those I have watched on KZread.

  • @lqr824

    @lqr824

    Ай бұрын

    Search KZread for Midway Montemayor: a three-part video showing you how the battle unfolded to the Japanese commander. It's probably the best video I've ever seen on KZread.

  • @dicksonfranssen

    @dicksonfranssen

    Ай бұрын

    If you have the time read the book Shattered Sword. Printed in 2005 so you'll probably find a cheap one somewhere.

  • @73Trident

    @73Trident

    Ай бұрын

    This was good. Read the book and watch Montemayors video on the Battle of Midway.

  • @lqr824

    @lqr824

    Ай бұрын

    @@73Trident yeah I've been commenting that too. The Montemayor video is the best thing I've ever seen on this battle in any kind of media.

  • @sg-yq8pm

    @sg-yq8pm

    Ай бұрын

    He narrates from the point of view that his audience don't know anything, as if we are all ignorant children, very simplistic and only a possible "the best explanation" if made for primary school aged children.

  • @mitchellhawkes22
    @mitchellhawkes2223 күн бұрын

    Jolly good job. Instead of taking an hour to explain this action (like so many others), you summed it up well in 16 minutes. That's what we like.

  • @onenote6619
    @onenote6619Ай бұрын

    Montemayor has an excellent set of animated videos showing how Midway proceeded from the Japanese point-of-view, using only the data that Japanese commanders had and showing why they made their decisions on the day.

  • @WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle

    @WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle

    11 күн бұрын

    I love that video! So often, we look at battles and judge the actions based on having hindsight and a God's eye view of the Battlefield, when the people in the moment had no such luxury

  • @edwardloomis887
    @edwardloomis887Ай бұрын

    I love Catalinas/PBYs. They're slow, they're ugly in a way, but they always seem to be in the right place at the right time, like 6:47 and 8:13 of this video and during the hunt for the Bismarck. Only recently have I learned about the "Black Cat" night operations in the Pacific, which increased my love for them even more.

  • @thewhorenextdoor8268

    @thewhorenextdoor8268

    Ай бұрын

    Bismarck was struck by swordfish not Catalinas

  • @dicksonfranssen

    @dicksonfranssen

    Ай бұрын

    The days of amphibious aircraft are still here. Check out the ShinMaywa US-2, not as cool as a Cat but still does the job.

  • @lastguy8613

    @lastguy8613

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@thewhorenextdoor8268 Bismarck was relocated by a Catalina after losing its pursuers, enabling it to be hunted down and sunk

  • @jmscalercio

    @jmscalercio

    Ай бұрын

    It was also a Catalina that spotted a crashed Zero on an island, allowing the first U.S. reverse engineering of it.

  • @jimshaffer1780

    @jimshaffer1780

    Ай бұрын

    They are building PBY inspired floatplanes again with all updated modern navigation, communication systems I had heard?

  • @russkinter3000
    @russkinter3000Ай бұрын

    Hearing and reading about this battle never fails to send chills down my spine.

  • @lqr824

    @lqr824

    Ай бұрын

    check out the KZread video Midway Montemayor: a three-part video showing you how the battle unfolded to the Japanese commander. It's probably the best video I've ever seen on KZread.

  • @mingyuhuang8944
    @mingyuhuang8944Ай бұрын

    This was such a tremendous event in the war. Thanks for covering it. Well made video. This is also the best narrator in The imperial war museum ❤❤

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    It was of zero consequence in reality.

  • @humbleopionist4366

    @humbleopionist4366

    Ай бұрын

    @@MarkHarrison733 ????

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    @@humbleopionist4366 Japan lost World War II on 7 December 1941.

  • @humbleopionist4366

    @humbleopionist4366

    Ай бұрын

    @@MarkHarrison733 You could say that, but that would be like saying Austria lost as soon as Archduke Ferdinand died, because theoretically they had no chance of winning, even with Germany on their side.

  • @nonenone7761

    @nonenone7761

    Ай бұрын

    It was hardly of no consequence. The four carriers lost that single day, took a total of 14 years to construct. Midway is where Japan lost the actual war. While it is not wrong to say they severely screwed themselves attacking Pearl Harbor, at Midway, they lost all hope and four carriers.

  • @chryse
    @chryseАй бұрын

    One of the more understated outcomes of the Battle of Midway, beyond the loss of the four Japanese fleet carriers, was the severe losses the IJN suffered in their naval aviator corps. The so many of them were highly trained veterans of actions over China and in air strikes against British holdings in Ceylon (Sri Lanka today). They were the best naval aviators in the world at the time of Pearl Harbor and the Battle of the Coral Sea. So many were lost at Midway that the IJN could not really recover. This was because the Japanese pilot training program was not designed to pump out replacements at the rate needed to man expended carrier air groups. Whereas combat experienced American aviators were rotated home to train new pilots. Many of the IJN squadrons were sent into the South Pacific and operated from Rabaul against American action in and around Guadalcanal, where they experienced more attrition. It became a negative feedback loop they would never recover from.

  • @bclmax

    @bclmax

    Ай бұрын

    totally wrong.. the pilot pool was beld out over the slot...pilot losses at midway was unfortunate but not lethal

  • @Jayjay-qe6um
    @Jayjay-qe6umАй бұрын

    John Ford directed two films about the events: 18-minute 1942 Movietone News documentary (released by the War Activities Committee) The Battle of Midway, which received the 1942 Academy Award for Best Documentary; and the eight-minute documentary Torpedo Squadron 8, which describes the heroism of Torpedo Squadron 8 of the USS Hornet. Ford, who was a Navy Reserve commander at the time, was present at Midway Atoll's power plant on Sand Island during the Japanese attack and filmed it. He received combat wounds from enemy fire in his arm during the filming.

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    Ford abused children.

  • @EllieMaes-Grandad

    @EllieMaes-Grandad

    Ай бұрын

    It was no coincidence that he and his teams were there . . .

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    Ford was a nonce, as Maureen O'Hara confirmed.

  • @jamesbednar8625
    @jamesbednar8625Ай бұрын

    Great video!!! Also often overlooked is the ABSENCE of a possible 5th Japanese aircraft carrier at Midway. The Japanese carrier SHOKAKU was badly damaged at the Battle of the Coral Sea but had a relatively intact air group. ZUIKAKU had its air group pretty much destroyed during the same battle. Japanese DOCTRINE at the time did not allow the transfer of one carrier air group to another. Had the Japanese allowed for the transfer of that air group, perhaps ZUIKAKU would have participated at Midway and may have been the deciding factor for victory OR just been a 5th carrier sunk. USS YORKTOWNs air group was virtually destroyed and basically the only trained/combat experienced air group that the US had was from the USS SARATOGA (though most of that combat experience was from the island raids early in the war). SARATOGA, being the torpedo magnet that she was early in the war, sailed to the West Coast for repairs while her air group was flown to Hawaii. SARATOGAs air group was transferred to YORKTOWN making her combat ready as well as the Herculean efforts to repair her. THANKS!!! for at least highlighting that SHOKAKU was badly damaged and had an air group pretty much intact at Coral Sea and that ZUIKAKU was not damaged but had not much of an air group remaining - this is probably one of the very few KZread channels that actually mentioned that fact. Also, Japan's belief in the probable sinking of YORKTOWN at Coral Sea may have also been the deciding factor in not adding an additional carrier to their strike group.

  • @rickjohnson6559

    @rickjohnson6559

    14 күн бұрын

    Buddy your better at history than me ❤

  • @kennethrobbins829
    @kennethrobbins829Ай бұрын

    Another consequence of Midway was the air cover that could have changed the Battle of Guadalcanal for the Japanese, was at the bottom of the Pacific.

  • @54mgtf22
    @54mgtf22Ай бұрын

    The importance of those few minutes on the outcome of the second world war cannot be overstated.

  • @bimsbarkas

    @bimsbarkas

    Ай бұрын

    I actually don't think it made much of a difference. The war for japan was lost the moment they started it. For germany there might be winning scenarios, for japan I just can't see any.

  • @breamoreboy

    @breamoreboy

    Ай бұрын

    @@bimsbarkas I believe it made a huge difference. Had the Japanese attack on Midway succeeded, wouldn't FDR have been forced by public opinion to focus on the Pacific rather than the European war?

  • @Minigoat_92

    @Minigoat_92

    Ай бұрын

    @@bimsbarkas it's not necessarily a case of Japan/Germany winning, but it would have led to the war going on for much longer than it did.

  • @harzzachseniorgamer5516

    @harzzachseniorgamer5516

    Ай бұрын

    There was no hope for Japan to counter the massive industrial capacity of the US. Their entire Kantai Kessen strategy, defeating the US navy in one single battle and then somehow (?) forcing the US to make a peace agreement, because Japans high command thought so little of the combat will Americans, was flawed from the start. Attacking Pearl Harbour had the US people so riled up ... there would have been not enough political pressure for peace even if the US would have lost Hawai.

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    @@bimsbarkas The US started World War II on 24 March 1933.

  • @Ken-fh4jc
    @Ken-fh4jcАй бұрын

    They forgot to mention after the first attack on the Yorktown, the fire control crews did such a good job that on the next wave of attacks the Japanese thought it was an entirely different carrier and attacked it again.

  • @robertgross578

    @robertgross578

    Ай бұрын

    Fire control is used for attacks on the enemy. Damage control is to keep the ship operating despite damage by the enemy.

  • @sergiocortes7151
    @sergiocortes7151Ай бұрын

    If you guys are interested. Montemayor has an excellent 3 video series on this Battle. Must see!

  • @shootfirst2097
    @shootfirst2097Ай бұрын

    Midway is the most fascinating, stand-alone battle of WWII (yes, I know there are others) and Guadacanal is the greatest campaign of WWII... because ALL of the key battle elements were in play: land, sea, air, scarce replenishment, codebreaking... along with the unknown outcome that tantalizingly seesawed back and forth...

  • @TorontoJediMaster
    @TorontoJediMaster24 күн бұрын

    Rear Admiral Raymond Spruance, commander of TF-16 was the one who made the decision to launch all of his aircraft at Nagumo's carriers. That was why all the planes that sunk Kaga and Agaki were present at the scene. Fletcher's holding back half of his aircraft led to the Hiryu being undamaged by the dive-bomber attack and thus able to launch the strikes that hit USS Yorktown.

  • @roygardiner2229
    @roygardiner2229Ай бұрын

    That was mesmerising and sobering. The courage on both sides was very evident. I shall have to watch it again to fully grasp how the pendulum of fate was swinging.

  • @FUBAR1986
    @FUBAR1986Ай бұрын

    The US damage control teams are what made a huge difference

  • @Idahoguy10157
    @Idahoguy10157Ай бұрын

    In 1942 American torpedoes did not work. At Midway only one torpedo struck and detonated on a Japanese ship.

  • @jimreilly917

    @jimreilly917

    Ай бұрын

    What’s infuriating is the manufacturers and navy KNEW THIS. CYA is hard to fight even in war.

  • @JimJohnson777
    @JimJohnson777Ай бұрын

    So, in a sense, it was a battle of attrition. A very short, intense, violent, chaotic battle of attrition. The torpedo bombers were indeed devastated however they wore down the defenses, letting the dive bombers in. Plus, Nagumo hesitated following doctrine while Fletcher attacked even when unprepared, throwing the Japanese off-balance. iIn the manner of Grant and Patton.

  • @edwardturner1282
    @edwardturner128220 күн бұрын

    I liked this video for it's condensed and to the point of this historic battle. Kudos to the narrator/host.

  • @jerrymiller8313
    @jerrymiller8313Ай бұрын

    Read John Parshalls book on midway it dispells some of the oft repeated myths of this battle.

  • @jeffandjoannbauer9567

    @jeffandjoannbauer9567

    Ай бұрын

    What's the book title and what were some of the myths it dispelled?

  • @frednone

    @frednone

    Ай бұрын

    @@jeffandjoannbauer9567 Shattered Sword, is the book, The state of the Japanese carriers flight decks is the big one.

  • @jerrymiller8313

    @jerrymiller8313

    Ай бұрын

    Shattered sword. Another myth/ opinion is that AF was a mystery. They knew it was midway but had to sell Washington . He also talks about the state of the decks and that they had plenty of time to get a combat air patrol to altitude. My opinion Marshall's book is excellent

  • @bclmax

    @bclmax

    Ай бұрын

    great book..its my catcher in the rye

  • @beeceesp1386

    @beeceesp1386

    Ай бұрын

    One of the biggest myths is that US Navy pilots and planes sank four Japanese aircraft carriers at Midway. Because attacking US Navy torpedo planes were wiped out in the initial attack, it was US Navy dive bombers who turned all four Japanese carriers into wrecks - but they were still afloat and not sinking. The Japanese realized towing burning wrecks back to Japan would affect the morale of the Japanese people. They also realized the carriers could not be salvaged - so they had their own destroyers torpedo the ships and sink (scuttle) them. A Japanese submarine found damaged US aircraft carrier YORKTOWN and torpedoed her. So as much as it causes amateur WWII historians to bristle and get upset. The actual weird fact is, Japan actually sank five aircraft carriers involved in the Battle of Midway, and the US Navy sank none.

  • @BHuang92
    @BHuang92Ай бұрын

    Japan got their Trafalgar but not in the way they wanted......

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    Both battles were irrelevant in reality.

  • @gmunro5443

    @gmunro5443

    Ай бұрын

    @@MarkHarrison733 Trafalgar ensured British naval superiority during the Napoleonic wars, which stopped Napoleon from invading Britain. History could have been radically different if Napoleon won.

  • @rexringtail471

    @rexringtail471

    Ай бұрын

    @@MarkHarrison733 How on Earth was Midway irrelevant? TF77 was on the ropes, the majority of 3rd/7th fleet were on the seafloor and even the US could not reconstitute losses fast enough to prevent a full invasion of Australia if Midway had gone pear shaped. It was a last throw of the dice, and failure would have led directly to the inevitable fall of Australia and probable fall of India and possible link up of the Axis in the red sea, eliminating the German's oil woes. Absolutely mind-boggling take you have there.

  • @Stilicho19801

    @Stilicho19801

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@gmunro5443 Trafalgar might have been avoided, because Napoleon had already decided to skip invading Britain (choosing instead to take his army to meet Austria and Russia at Austerlitz). Nelson gained victory at the cost of his life, while Villeneuve, having ignored orders to stay put, lost the battle at sea, was captured and later exchanged but died by Napoleon's orders upon his return to France.

  • @gmunro5443

    @gmunro5443

    Ай бұрын

    @@Stilicho19801 Before the war of the third coalition, Napoleon massed 200,000 troops on the other side of the English channel for an invasion of Britain.

  • @halecesar1461
    @halecesar1461Ай бұрын

    After researching this battle for years, it’s amazing how successful the battle turned out for America 🇺🇸. I call it fate, because the Japanese wasted time to rearm their planes to attack the US carriers thus giving the American time to attack their carriers. And the planes that sunk the Japanese Carriers got lost at first but with a stroke of fate the found the carriers while their guard was down and sunk all 3 Carriers 🫡🇺🇸

  • @frednone

    @frednone

    Ай бұрын

    I always point at Midway when someone asks about God favoring the US.

  • @user-dc8vr2gd2y
    @user-dc8vr2gd2y26 күн бұрын

    I was proud to serve on the USS Shangri La CVA 38 built in 1943. I served in 1959 for a year. I have a good perspective how the WWll carriers were build and operated.

  • @Rikolus8383
    @Rikolus8383Ай бұрын

    Excellent. I watch a lot of history videos and so many are 40 minutes or longer to cover similar amount of material. Your presentation was well-paced, succinct, visually interesting, and gave a thorough overview of Midway's battle. All in about 17 minutes; outstanding.

  • @frisk151
    @frisk151Ай бұрын

    Excellent coverage! Thanks!

  • @matdrat
    @matdratАй бұрын

    Nogumo was given command of Kido Butai because of his seniority. He had little experience or affinity for carrier warfare hence it was likely he would follow doctrine.

  • @patrickwentz8413
    @patrickwentz8413Ай бұрын

    Fletcher and Spruance were the stars of the battle. Fletcher was a battleship man, and Spruance was a cruiser man. Both could remain calm and make the correct decisions under high pressure, which I can assure you is a rare trait. Spruance would go on to command the Battle of the Philippines Sea.

  • @breamoreboy

    @breamoreboy

    Ай бұрын

    Halsey would have been in command of the carriers, but at the time of Midway was out of action with a skin complaint. Halsey recommended Spruance for the job, and oh boy, did he do it.

  • @penultimateh766

    @penultimateh766

    Ай бұрын

    Actually it had more to do with blind luck than their command ability.

  • @timovangalen1589

    @timovangalen1589

    Ай бұрын

    @@penultimateh766 Spruance ordered his strike force to fly directly to the target without forming up. He gambled that they would catch the Japanese carriers off guard and in transition; receiving planes from Midway while spotting the carrier aircraft on deck. A lot of pilots died because they attacked in dribs and drabs, but Spruance's gamble ultimately paid off.

  • @contumelious-8440

    @contumelious-8440

    Ай бұрын

    @@penultimateh766 Wrong, but thanks for being an idiot we can all rally around. Watch the videos, read more about it. It wasn't luck. The US planned this battle and brought the resources needed to win it. The commanders used their resources in a way that brought victory. They didn't GUESS, HOPE, WISH. They made tactical decisions to send their forces to defeat the enemy. Otherwise, you could have been in command, we all could have put our hands over our eyes and hoped for the best luck.

  • @centurymemes1208

    @centurymemes1208

    Ай бұрын

    @@contumelious-8440its more luck. analysis videos showed. its just a bad day for the japanese to not have luck on their side 😂

  • @jmay3200
    @jmay3200Ай бұрын

    Great content, really clear and accessible

  • @whbrown1862
    @whbrown1862Ай бұрын

    Excellent and informative video! Thank you!

  • @Pozer714
    @Pozer714Ай бұрын

    Great documentary!

  • @lumberlikwidator8863
    @lumberlikwidator8863Ай бұрын

    Nimitz kicked Yamamoto’s ass at Midway. He is an American superhero. By the way, my Aunts Maria and Celia worked in a war plant, wiring the cockpits of Army and Navy aircraft. They were tiny enough to crawl into the nose of the airplanes reach into the narrowest space to get the job done. My Uncles Charlie and Mike were in the Navy, but not until the last couple years of the war. My Dad tried repeatedly to enlist but kept getting turned away because he was almost blind in one eye. Thanks for the great job of breaking down the action at Midway. In my opinion, the most important naval battle in history.

  • @apokatastasian2831

    @apokatastasian2831

    Ай бұрын

    I was just hearing someone say that cheated eye exams to get into the army may be the most influential cheating in americas history because of how many absolute badasses went on to do tons of damage for uncle sam, with less than perfect peepers

  • @chingading957
    @chingading957Ай бұрын

    Brilliant video expert retelling of one of my favorite stories from ww2. Incredible battle

  • @Floods-uy6tl
    @Floods-uy6tlАй бұрын

    Great video!!

  • @denvan3143
    @denvan3143Ай бұрын

    Japan, December 7: It seemed like a good idea at the time. Japan, midway: Well, _that_ didn’t turn out the way we thought.

  • @timovangalen1589

    @timovangalen1589

    Ай бұрын

    Germany, Stalingrad: You're telling me!

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    The US caused the attack on the naval base, as Roosevelt confirmed.

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    @@timovangalen1589 The Second Battle of El Alamein was far more important than Stalingrad.

  • @DirtyMikeandTheBoys69

    @DirtyMikeandTheBoys69

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@MarkHarrison733 how do you figure?

  • @jimslancio

    @jimslancio

    Ай бұрын

    "Pearl Harbor didn't work out, so we got you with tape decks."

  • @Miamcoline
    @Miamcoline23 күн бұрын

    Super interesting. Great context. I finally get why it was such a great victory and critical battle.

  • @toma5153
    @toma5153Ай бұрын

    Love that PBY at IWM. It looks very sharp.

  • @josephbingham1255
    @josephbingham1255Ай бұрын

    This is the best illustration of aircraft numbers, types and arrival times on station I have seen. It really clarifies the movements. My father was on a destroyer ranging from the Aleutians to New Guinea. A friend of his is still entombed on the USS Arizona. My mother "strung cables" (electrical?) through P38s in Burbank. 16:02 above the Saratoga must be the Lexington sunk 8 May 1942. A quality presentation.

  • @glashoppah
    @glashoppahАй бұрын

    Excellent video.

  • @MrShadowpanther3
    @MrShadowpanther3Ай бұрын

    For a different angle on this event, there are a couple of videos out there that depict the battle of Midway from the Japanese perspective. What they knew, when they knew it, and how the dynamic nature of the attacks cause decision making that ultimately was their undoing. It does a good job of creating the "fog of war" and lack of information the Japanese commanders had.

  • @Andrew-ep4kw
    @Andrew-ep4kwАй бұрын

    From what I understand, the primary purpose of seizing Midway was not to set up a defense position, though that may have been a secondary goal. The primary purpose was to seize Midway and lure the (supposedly) 2 remaining American carriers out to retake the island, where the 4 carriers of the Kido Butai could easily send them to the bottom of the Pacific. With no carriers left in the Pacific, the Japanese reasoned, the US would surely sue for a negotiated peace.

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotmeАй бұрын

    I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

  • @johnstirling6597
    @johnstirling6597Ай бұрын

    I would have thought that Raymond Spruance would have had a mention, at least in passing.

  • @timbergling674

    @timbergling674

    Ай бұрын

    Ditto.

  • @johnstirling6597

    @johnstirling6597

    Ай бұрын

    @@timbergling674 As the on site battlefield commander making the minute by minute decisions, it is arguable that he changed the course of the war in the Pacific. To be sure he got very lucky, but he had the belief to back himself.

  • @mikeprevost8650

    @mikeprevost8650

    23 күн бұрын

    Especially since it was he, in command of TF 16, who decided to launch the attack without waiting for Fletcher's orders. Spruance launched all of his dive and torpedo bombers whereas Fletcher, for some inexplicable reason, held half of his striking force in reserve. Spruance trusted the intelligence. Fletcher seemed to think that the Japanese had some secret ghost fleet that would pop up and surprise him. Had he sent an all-out attack, it was very possible that Hiryu wouldn't have escaped the initial attack, and Yorktown wouldn't have been lost. Another year into the war, Nimitz finally sent Fletcher to the "beach" after some questionable decisions in the Solomons naval battles.

  • @alfnoakes392
    @alfnoakes392Ай бұрын

    Correction: 7:30. We have a flying PBY5A here in New Zealand, based at Ardmore. It is more 'original' than the one shown, with no later-modification entry-staircase (Health and Safety requirement?) added to the rear hull (entry is by climbing into an upper hatchway on the forward hull). Been up in her a couple of times. Given the number of PBYs built, I am guessing there are others out there.

  • @petestorz172
    @petestorz172Ай бұрын

    The IJN and USN both made considerable use of seaplanes for scouting. Japanese seaplanes were a bit faster and longer range. When it came to scouting at sea, the IJN usually used seaplanes from their cruisers or battleships for scouting, while the USN used SBDs from carriers' "Scouting" squadron, the planes being armed with 500 lb. bombs for use in case they found something (SBDs could carry 1000 lb. bombs). WRT the time when Nagumo was arming/rearming his attack planes, this was done in the hangar decks, not the flight decks. That was IJN doctrine. Because of the piecemeal attacks from Midway and the US torpedo squadrons, Nagumo's flight decks were kept busy refueling and rearming CAP fighters, and the multiple waves had the CAP and ships' AA gunners focused at low altitudes.

  • @jamespriddy8275
    @jamespriddy8275Ай бұрын

    I’ve read exhaustively about this. The consensus, though all opinionated, is that the intelligence in breaking the code was most instrumental in the victory. It was weeks before the news reach all of America. My childhood mentor served in the Army in the war. He had never heard of the Midway battle in his life. When I recounted the story to him, he was 92. I must have told it well. He was mesmerized and asked how come I knew so much about it. LOL

  • @SuperGarri777
    @SuperGarri77713 күн бұрын

    McClusky’s actions at Midway strongly helped to win the battle; which was the turning point in World War 2 Pacific Theater. One could argue this one man’s actions helped to saved not just thousands of American lives at the Battle of Midway but also thousands who would have died of America lost its all of its aircraft carriers. This battle cost Japan 4 of its total 6 carriers. With McClusky’s decisions helping to sink 3 of the 4. He is a true legend of World War 2. He was honored with Tombstone Promotion; to Rear Admiral. 🇺🇸

  • @pimpompoom93726
    @pimpompoom93726Ай бұрын

    Excellent summary of the battle of Midway, one of the best I have seen. Well done.

  • @dulio12385
    @dulio12385Ай бұрын

    Midway was an object lesson in "Put your toys away when you are done," especially they're the highly explosive kind.

  • @TinKnight
    @TinKnightАй бұрын

    It's just crazy that Pearl Harbor to Midway was exactly-ish 6 months, with Guam, Wake Island, Hong Kong, the Philippines conquest, ABDACOM's calamities in Java Sea & everywhere else, the collapse of Indonesian, Malayan, & Singaporean defenses, Burma, Doolittle, the raid on Ceylon, the raid on Sydney Harbor, & Coral Sea all taking place in that stretch (not to mention offensives in China). It's also mind-boggling how much could've been changed if the US Navy spent just a teeny bit more pre-War to test their torpedoes with warheads so that they would've actually worked when launched from subs, ships, & aircraft..

  • @JamieBainbridge
    @JamieBainbridgeАй бұрын

    I've always thought the IJN's aims at Midway were very successful. They wanted to force a decisive victor in the Pacific theatre through destruction of aircraft carriers. They forced it alright.

  • @tessat338

    @tessat338

    26 күн бұрын

    Exactly. The IJN's aims were exemplary. The timing was the problem. The Japanese naval planners deliberately ignored the possibility of the US carriers arriving in the area of Midway before at least four and more likely five, six or even seven days after the surprise Japanese attack on the island. That is the time that the planners predicted that it would have taken the US navy to hear about the attack on Midway and then to regroup their carriers, arm and refuel them, and then to proceed to Midway in response to the news of the attack. The USN also wasn't supposed to have three carriers because the the Japanese had reported Yorktown as being irreparably damaged and most likely sunk at the battle of the Coral Sea along with the Lexington. When the IJN war-gamed the battle in the months before the attack, junior naval officers attempted to play a round where the US carriers were in place when the Japanese Naval task force, the "Kido Butai," arrived at Midway. The referees who were judging the war game ruled that it was so unlikely for the US carriers to be in place when the Kido Butai came into range of Midway, as to be a virtual impossibly. To play that option was therefore a waste of time and so the scenario was never tested. If the Kido Butai commanders had at least considered the possibilities, they might have been able to make faster decisions. However, since Japanese naval doctrine scorned defensive damage control procedures as cowardly and defeatist thinking, no amount of military zeal could protect the fuel lines and ammunition stores from being vulnerable to being ignited by a hit from US aircraft or even an accident by any Japanese aircraft landing on any of the carriers.

  • @Ian-iu2tl
    @Ian-iu2tlАй бұрын

    Guadalcanal was the pivotal campaign as the IJN had remained as a force to be reckoned with. Midway was important and also psychologically profound for both sides but again, Guadalcanal was the real turning point.

  • @user-cb3id6ef4z

    @user-cb3id6ef4z

    Ай бұрын

    John Prados book 'Islands of Destiny:The Solomons Campaign and the Eclipse of the Rising Sun' proves that Midway was not the acclaimed turning point of the war in the Pacific. It was the IJN being defeated in the Solomons by their inability to retake Henderson Field on Guadalcanal.

  • @Ian-iu2tl

    @Ian-iu2tl

    Ай бұрын

    @@user-cb3id6ef4z Excellent book. Solomons and Guadalcanal were a brutal slog and the question of success for the Allies was certainly not well defined...but they did it. I am currently in the Philippines and I have been blessed with stories of first hand acounts from Filipinos and their struggles with Japanese occupation. Just amazing.

  • @shawnn7502

    @shawnn7502

    Ай бұрын

    I think psychologically Midway was the main turning point though. The Japanese had been nearly invincible until that point. That five minutes changed everything.

  • @Ian-iu2tl

    @Ian-iu2tl

    Ай бұрын

    Yep...a deep slog. I think it's difficult for most to imagine the carnage and lives lost during this campaign.

  • @bobk4438
    @bobk4438Ай бұрын

    My dad was a gunner on PBYs in WWII. Lucky for me he didn't see any hostile action.

  • @stephennewton2223
    @stephennewton2223Ай бұрын

    My reading is that in face to face combat the Wildcat was superior to the Zero. Once we learned to maximize the Wildcat's strengths, which seems to have happened at Midway, Wildcat's shot down more Zeros than they lost.

  • @catinthehat906

    @catinthehat906

    Ай бұрын

    You might be thinking of the later Hellcat with the R-2800 Double Wasp engine.

  • @stephennewton2223

    @stephennewton2223

    Ай бұрын

    @@catinthehat906 I don't think so. I was thinking of the air battles around Guadalcanal.

  • @lqr824

    @lqr824

    Ай бұрын

    > Wildcat's shot down more Zeros than they lost. That's important if you're narrowly arguing which aircraft was "better." As far as the war, it's all about production and logistics. Even if every Zero could shoot down four Wildcats, the Japanese would have been absolutely scoured from the seas. They couldn't build replacements while the US could. They couldn't man replacements while the US could. They couldn't train the men while the US could. They couldn't fuel the planes and ships, and the US could.

  • @lqr824

    @lqr824

    Ай бұрын

    @@catinthehat906 > You might be thinking of the later Hellcat with the R-2800 Double Wasp engine. The Hellcat and Corsair basically came once the Wildcat-equipped forces had turned the Japanese onto the defensive. Sure, the R-2800 aircraft were quite superior, but it was a superiority arguably we didn't even need. We turned the tide with Wildcats.

  • @catinthehat906

    @catinthehat906

    Ай бұрын

    @@lqr824 The Zero was significantly faster, more manoeuvrable than the Wildcat- that's why it was replaced by the Hellcat. US pilots had to develop tactics like the 'Thatch weave' to counter these weaknesses. The fact that they managed to hold their own was a tribute to the skills and superior training of the US pilots- despite having an inferior plane.

  • @m1t2a1
    @m1t2a1Ай бұрын

    If that was Canadian Vickers it's PBV. 7:14 Consolidated was PBY Such a good plane.

  • @hughledger7835

    @hughledger7835

    Ай бұрын

    Pretty sure it would be called a Canso.

  • @marcomarc151
    @marcomarc151Ай бұрын

    The cameraman always impresses me, being actually able to record this is amazing.

  • @gojithecringe
    @gojithecringeАй бұрын

    Another great video for you guys! When i will have a trip to UK, i will make sure to visit the Imperial War Museum

  • @MartinHopkinson

    @MartinHopkinson

    Ай бұрын

    There are five IWM sites, so make sure you pick IWM Duxford if that’s what you’re interested in!

  • @EllieMaes-Grandad

    @EllieMaes-Grandad

    Ай бұрын

    Two sites, Duxford, near Cambridge, and central London, near Elephant & Castle.

  • @billmactiernan6304
    @billmactiernan6304Ай бұрын

    Its nice to finally see a description of Midway which gives credit to the actual tactical commander who won the battle, Frank Jack Fletcher.

  • @babuzzard6470
    @babuzzard6470Ай бұрын

    Well, that’s what happens when you awaken a sleeping giant.

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    The US was already at war in 1940, as Admiral King had confirmed at the time.

  • @ErroneousTheory
    @ErroneousTheoryАй бұрын

    Good god! That purple corduroy jacket with the fur collar is amazing! Oh, and cool video too

  • @KingfisherTalkingPictures
    @KingfisherTalkingPicturesАй бұрын

    The Hornet is an amazing museum in the city of Alameda, CA. I’ve been in it several times, and its shocking how many thousand young men were jammed into it.

  • @ptonpc
    @ptonpcАй бұрын

    Drachinifel did a video about Japan's 'special' thinking about damage control and the inflexibility of Japan's naval organisational structure. These factors led to a much lower chance of saving ships that had been hit.

  • @Donuthan

    @Donuthan

    Ай бұрын

    What's it called, that would be a fantastic watch but searching on youtube gets worse every year and his library is... substantial.

  • @tonystone1016

    @tonystone1016

    Ай бұрын

    Try a creator called Montemayor. His content is excellent and his library is relatively small compared to Drachinifel.

  • @Donuthan

    @Donuthan

    Ай бұрын

    @@tonystone1016I've been subbed to Monte since his Defeat in detail video before the algorithm hit his channel and he was averaging 30k or so, it may be retreading ground covered in other videos but Drachnifel always seems exhaustive, I appreciate the shoutout though 👍

  • @mozzy207
    @mozzy207Ай бұрын

    Great video as always o7

  • @joesantamaria5874
    @joesantamaria5874Ай бұрын

    Midway is a clear reminder of how a united, determined America was potent and virtually unstoppable, and could be again. A great moment in our history. Thanks to IWM for the reminder.

  • @raijinenel3116

    @raijinenel3116

    Ай бұрын

    I doubt they could be so effective anymore, it is too politically and racially mixed up now.

  • @MarkHarrison733

    @MarkHarrison733

    Ай бұрын

    The Soviet Union won World War II.

  • @charlesterrizzi8311

    @charlesterrizzi8311

    Ай бұрын

    The more we promote people based on their skin color or other “diversity” qualification the less likely we will be to stand against any threat existential. DEI stands for Didn’t Earn It.

  • @batsonelectronics

    @batsonelectronics

    Ай бұрын

    @@charlesterrizzi8311 so you don't know what DEI is and spouting stupid shit on youtube, got it. " Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are organizational frameworks which seek to promote the fair treatment and full participation of all people, particularly groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination on the basis of identity or disability." no where does it mean unqualified people are promoted over white people.

  • @TinKnight

    @TinKnight

    Ай бұрын

    Midway is a clear reminder that luck & planning matter more than just about anything else. The US VERY EASILY could've lost Midway if just one thing had gone wrong. Without the rushed repairs to Yorktown, the Japanese strike force would've been nearly intact & caught the 2 American carriers with what remained of their strike force reloading on their deck (if they even bothered trying to strike again with such massive losses). If the Japanese had altered their air wing strategy to allow units from multiple carriers, Zuikaku would've easily been deployed. If the Japanese hadn't launched an ineffective flying boat bombing raid on Pearl Harbor in March, the US wouldn't have mined French Frigate Shoals, which the Japanese planned to use to warn of US carrier movements (thus, they would've known that 3 carriers were involved, rather than thinking it was only land-based aircraft). If the Japanese hadn't delayed changing their codebook by a couple of days, the US wouldn't have known (as quickly) that the target was Midway. If a B-26 hadn't nearly kamikazed into Nagumo's bridge, Nagumo wouldn't have been as motivated to eliminate the otherwise ineffectual Midway resistance. If Nagumo hadn't violated Yamamoto's order, his 2nd wave would've been armed for attacks against ships & launched before his 1st wave returned. Unity & general American awesomeness had minimal impacts on Midway. Luck & effective planning made all of the difference.

  • @davidanderson4091
    @davidanderson4091Ай бұрын

    7:33 That is not the only flying Catalina outside of the Americas. Here in New Zealand, we have Catalina Serial No. CV357 built on March 1944 by Canadian Vickers - Reg ZK-PBY. There are also two in Australia, one in the UK, and one in Greece.

  • @matismf
    @matismfАй бұрын

    The US also brought their top film director - John Ford - to Midway to film the attack. THAT is what you are seeing in the Midway attack portions of this video.

  • @gwynm8506
    @gwynm8506Ай бұрын

    Aircraft carriers are a remarkable thing. I feel they are one of the only vehicles in a war where losing one has a significant impact on the outcome. A nation could lose hundreds of tanks, or planes and it will have little impact overall. However losing a few aircraft carriers cripples their navy.

  • @harzzachseniorgamer5516

    @harzzachseniorgamer5516

    Ай бұрын

    Not the US. Japan didnt have the ability to destroy enough shipyards on the West coast or block the entire West coast and even if ... there still was the East coast. As with Germany and the USSR, Japan started a war against an enemy they gravely underestimated. If Midway had been a loss for the US, Japan would have still lost the war. In 1944 Japan lost so much trade ships & ressources to US submarines, their industrial production and oil supply was crippled to a fraction of pre-war capacity. No chance, no way.

  • @basilmcdonnell9807

    @basilmcdonnell9807

    Ай бұрын

    Carriers aren't much use if you have no planes or pilots. By end 1943 Japan had lost so many planes and pilots in the Solomons that their carriers were bobbing about uselessly with no aircraft.

  • @gwynm8506

    @gwynm8506

    Ай бұрын

    @@basilmcdonnell9807 you're missing the point, what I'm saying is the value of a carrier. Any nation can lose hundreds of aircraft because they are replaceable. Carriers aren't

  • @gwynm8506

    @gwynm8506

    Ай бұрын

    @@harzzachseniorgamer5516 dude you completely missed the point

  • @Atlantis.Reborn

    @Atlantis.Reborn

    Ай бұрын

    The atomic bomb, while for a brief period, made all other wartime material and resources combined by all countries including those of the US, totally and completely redundant and obsolete. It was only when the USSR got their own nuclear weapon was the balance of power restored. Up until then, the USA had absolute power over all people on the planet and it didn't matter if any other country had more manpower and military material over the USA. The nuke was the God of war. Lets imagine what civilization would look like today if Stalin or Hitler got to the nukes first.

  • @patrickmiano7901
    @patrickmiano7901Ай бұрын

    Most conventional battles are won by the side with the most resources, provided it makes the fewest mistakes.

  • @karlzaunbrecher8241
    @karlzaunbrecher8241Ай бұрын

    The Midway battle is one of the best examples of the expression "the fog of war". It was like a chess match in which both players could only see half the board.

  • @antoniocarrascosa6060
    @antoniocarrascosa6060Ай бұрын

    Muy buen documental, fantasticos gráficos del movimiento de los escuadrones aéreos de uno y otro bando....enhorabuena desde España....

  • @jamesbriers696
    @jamesbriers696Ай бұрын

    Read "Shattered Sword" by Parshall and Tully. It gives a picture of the battle from the Japanese perspective. Explains the problems the IJN had with their carrier operations for the entire battle. Essential reading if you want to understand this pivotal battle in the Pacific.

  • @duncanjames914
    @duncanjames914Ай бұрын

    My Dad was a WAG on a Canadian Catalina. They were the greatest generation for sure.

  • @VersusARCH
    @VersusARCHАй бұрын

    Primarily because of inadequate early warning and fighter direction system. Radar and properly shielded radios were big advantages for the US.

  • @cesaravegah3787
    @cesaravegah37872 күн бұрын

    The fact that the same pilot delivered the killing blows to two carriers is almost incredible, the courage and skill of most of the Americans was impressive but the performance of Richard H Best that day was the stuff of legends, the fact that his name was actually "Best" is the kind of thing were reality was more strange than fiction.

  • @GeneralKenobiSIYE
    @GeneralKenobiSIYEАй бұрын

    Yorktown had been hit, but was repaired enough to remain on station and launched another attack which got the last Japanese carrier, but planes from said carrier managed to hit Yorktown again, not knowing it was the same ship they managed to strike earlier in the day. They thought it was ANOTHER of the Yorktown class. The attack on Yorktown undid all the repair work and it was abandoned by all nonessential personnel and was well on its way back to being repaired enough to be able to make it back to Pearl, but she was attacked by a sub. The attack broke the escorting ship in half and the damage caused by further torpedo hits along with the escort's magazines going up (IIRC), forced the USN to abandon Yorktown. With how good the damage control on the experienced USN carriers was at this point, if they had tried to, they might have actually only just have saved Yorktown, but in the middle of battle it was believed the ship was doomed so she was scuttled.

  • @HamBands
    @HamBandsАй бұрын

    Interesting, but there appears to be no mention of Adm. Spruance, who was in charge of Task Force 16. Later, he was in overall control of the whole fleet after the Yorktown was disabled and Adm. Fletcher had to retire from the action. This story keeps getting retold with a lot of differences regarding the actions of the various players. My impressions was that the actions of Spruance were of greater importance then were Fletcher's, even though Spruance was not an aviator.

  • @pgwchaos
    @pgwchaosАй бұрын

    Before the Yorktown was abandoned, the ship was hit by a Japanese attack; however the damage control teams was was able to get the ship back in the battle. After the main action of the battle they almost salvaged the Yorktown, and were in the process of towing the ship; however a Japanese submarine was able to sneak pass the destroyers and finished the Yorktown off, and sunk the destroyer towing the Yorktown. (Which I believe were the only two American ships lost during the battle)

  • @michaelcodelmar9547
    @michaelcodelmar9547Ай бұрын

    The real heroes were the codebreakers

  • @davidbrooks8809

    @davidbrooks8809

    Ай бұрын

    100% True

  • @matdrat

    @matdrat

    Ай бұрын

    Everyone forgets Commander Rochefort because Admiral King was a useless vindictive POS.

  • @Doolittle1954

    @Doolittle1954

    Ай бұрын

    Were the codebreakers hero's? Yes! Were they the real hero's? Not in my book. The real hero's were the men who fought and died above the pacific waters.

  • @harryjscanlan8740

    @harryjscanlan8740

    3 күн бұрын

    The codebreakers were not in danger of losing their lives. Just saying…

  • @tonybrewster988
    @tonybrewster988Ай бұрын

    Umm there's also a flying Catalina here in new Zealand. You can go for flights in it, it lives at new Plymouth airport.

  • @ironboy3245
    @ironboy3245Ай бұрын

    I never understood why the japanese didn't transfer Shokaku's air wing to Zuikaku to reinforce the midway operation

  • @what4hats

    @what4hats

    Ай бұрын

    Unlike the US or UK carriers, the Japanese carriers operated in pairs. The two carriers had their towers on opposite sides of the deck, allowing them to launch their aircraft in concert. This also made it much more difficult to land or take off from a carrier you hadn't trained on.

  • @wutang80oc39
    @wutang80oc39Ай бұрын

    Admirial Yamamoto who planned pearl harbor, said if Japan didnt defeat the US in 6 months they would lose the war, the power shift at midway happened just days before he predicted the shifting of the tide of war.

  • @kingjoe3rd
    @kingjoe3rdАй бұрын

    Admiral Farragut and Mahan would have been proud.

  • @factchecker9358
    @factchecker9358Ай бұрын

    It doesn't make sense that the Japanese would divide their forces and send two carriers to the Aleutians as diversion while already assuming Yorktown was out of action. Historians should highlight that massive blunder to a greater extent.

  • @anthonyxavier6300

    @anthonyxavier6300

    Ай бұрын

    Well they used the light carriers since they still needed air cover for their invasion at the Aleutian. The Japanese expected only 2 carriers at Pearl when they attacked Midway. In my opinion, they made the same mistake twice. They should have waited the attack until that there was confirmation that the U.S. carriers were indeed at Pearl.

  • @bclmax

    @bclmax

    Ай бұрын

    it wasnt a diversion....the IJN had to make a deal with the IJA.

  • @kevinbrown7219
    @kevinbrown7219Ай бұрын

    Not one mention of Rudi Spruance? A cruiser commander who was in charge of the carriers and pivotal in the victory.

  • @Conn30Mtenor
    @Conn30MtenorАй бұрын

    There are a host of reasons why. Firstly, the Japanese could have brought more power to bear but as was their wont the Midway plan was far more complicated than it need to be. Zuikaku could have taken on Shokaku's air group and joined the Kido Butai. The light carriers joining the pointless demonstration at Alaska could have been there as well. Secondly, Japanese doctrine, always attack attack attack. They could have used carrier bombers as scouting elements but didn't and as a result Japanese scouting was inadequate. Nagumo wasn't a carrier specialist- he fought the battle according to doctrine but somebody like Ozawa would probably have done a better job; the cause was Japanese culture- Nagumo was senior.

  • @kermitwilson
    @kermitwilsonАй бұрын

    The war was over before Midway, Japan lost in production and training. Japan could have kept those carriers, they about to overwhelmed by massive production numbers of carriers, small and large.

  • @lqr824

    @lqr824

    Ай бұрын

    Basically the war was over when the first bomb hit Midway. Given the relative production capabilities, Japan had absolutely zero chance no matter what happened.

  • @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-

    @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-

    Ай бұрын

    The Japanese were pretty much unstoppable until Midway.

  • @jimnorris4600
    @jimnorris4600Ай бұрын

    This battle was of phenomenal importance because it meant that from then on, the Japanese were essentially done at some time in the future. Therefore, the US could concentrate on winning the war in Europe. It probably shortened the war by at least two years and God knows how many casualties.

  • @user-mz6rz6mg9q
    @user-mz6rz6mg9qАй бұрын

    Cool

  • @RDBean
    @RDBean20 күн бұрын

    As a retired Navy MM1-1996, serving mostly on 931DDs, protecting the carriers was job 1

  • @rickjohnson6559

    @rickjohnson6559

    14 күн бұрын

    Visit the battle of samar. DDs and DEs. Giving a battleship effort against the biggest battleship ever built. They turned headlong into the face of certain death. Brave young men. And Japan's main battle group. The Yamato with 18 inch guns. I cry. Every time I think about it. The reason. Landing shore aerial groups on escort carriers. All alone read it. It's part of Leyte gulf. Tin cans that fought like battleships

  • @charlesmcintyre8142
    @charlesmcintyre814229 күн бұрын

    Spruance was in charge. Fletcher "i will conform to your movements"

  • @ndotl
    @ndotlАй бұрын

    Understated is how military intelligence is what really determined the outcome of the war, both with Japan and with the Nazis.