Background videos for better understanding of specific subjects discussed in this video: Quantum Field theory visualization: kzread.info/dash/bejne/nKB50diwdZTVeKw.html Quantum mechanical model of the atom: kzread.info/dash/bejne/mIRmtqOwZ7HUhrg.html

@MBBSthoughts007

2 жыл бұрын

🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳

@kuwaitisnotadeployment1373

2 жыл бұрын

Cool worlds channel posted a cool video yesterday that compliments this one for anyone interested.

@LucenProject

2 жыл бұрын

Is distance quantized?

@kuwaitisnotadeployment1373

2 жыл бұрын

@@LucenProject that's a interesting question...I dont know the answer. What is the smallest measurement of distance we are capable of measuring?

@berlymahn

2 жыл бұрын

@@kuwaitisnotadeployment1373 plank length

This guy's videos are so clear to understand any complexity that we have in our universe. You work hard to make this easier for us. 👍🏻

In watch a lot of these types of channels, but Arvin Ash is the only one I wish was my friend. 💛

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks buddy. I AM your friend.

@kidzbop38isstraightfire92

2 жыл бұрын

That's oddly how I feel lol. I watch a bunch lf these channels but Arvin seems like a guy I'd like to have a drink with and pick his brain.

@shintube

2 жыл бұрын

Plus, he looks like imhotep from the Mummy.

@danielhathaway1498

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed, but also hank from scishow, michael of vsauce fame, and DEFINITELY derek of veritasium.

@kidzbop38isstraightfire92

2 жыл бұрын

@@danielhathaway1498 nope, f*ck those plebs...its Arvin or GTFO

The best video I've ever seen on the topic. Straight to the point and easy to understand. Thank you.

"As we know, every object emits radiation." You certainly don't talk down to your audience and that's very refreshing. At 43, I only recently learned about Black Body radiation and it's still blowing my mind. Another great video Arvin!

@russiankid112233

2 жыл бұрын

“We” the scientific community. Not KZread lol.

@naytchh7

2 жыл бұрын

@@russiankid112233Incorrect, unlike some other science presenters, Arvin doesn't dictate facts to his audience, he talks to them kindly.

@russiankid112233

2 жыл бұрын

@@naytchh7 Dictation and kindness are mutually exclusive, and saying we in reference to professionals of the field doesn't equate to dictating fact. weather that's what he meant is debatable.

@Peakfreud

2 жыл бұрын

@@russiankid112233 You're not gonna win That debate, social media is way too Emotive. I agree with you, But the purpose of a lot of comments isn't to be right, it's to be presumed right.

There is an underrated (IMHO) paper by Lucian Hardy "Quantum Theory from Five Reasonable Axioms" relating to this. And yes, General Relativity is also compatible with these axioms (the first axiom being the principle of relativity dressed up as "measurability") Given the body of empirical evidence summarized by QM and GR, it is almost inconceivable that a different set of axioms that are not reducible to these five might also explain this data. The conclusion (by an almost overwhelming likelihood) is that quantum theory may be incomplete but not incorrect - that is if we find a unified theory, it will also be quantum in nature. Curiously the first 4 axioms in this paper come from classical probability theory. The last, which is what makes a theory "quantum" in nature, is simply a statement of reversible continuity between any two system states.

Thank you. Your channel is always enlightening and the graphics are fab.

it's just what Big Quant wants us to believe

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Lol.

@ESL-O.G.

2 жыл бұрын

big quant 😂😂😂

@JohnnyAmerique

2 жыл бұрын

I’m sure this is meant in jest, but the notion that “big science” (i.e., scientists employed in large, complex experiments like the LHC) is in it for the money is utterly ridiculous. Anyone with a Ph.D in physics could go to Wall Street or the City of London and be making a high six figure income (just to start) at any hedge fund tomorrow.

@DrDeuteron

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyAmerique yes they can.

@patsk8872

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyAmerique Wow I must have missed Hedge Fund Management in my many physics courses. But let me guess, physics-ists can do anything because they are smarter-er

Great video Arvin, one of your best so far. Very well written and put together. Looking forward for more!

@annedrieck7316

2 жыл бұрын

Black body radiation is racist😡😡😡

I really love the music at the start when the Arvin Ash logo comes up. Credits to the makers.

@nolan412

2 жыл бұрын

Is vapor a wave or a particle?

@BlisterHiker

2 жыл бұрын

I was probably made with Waldorf Quantum and Behringer Neutron synthesizers ;-)

@gohancomfejao

2 жыл бұрын

EBM is really nice to dance to

Time is fascinating. I worked the subway stations for nearly 10 years. From one end of the city to the other. Every so often I would notice the city would be saying that, "Today just flew by" or "The day was just dragging along." How can an entire city complain about the same time paradox unless it was effected by it. Maybe a time distorted bubble the earth passes through in its revolution around the sun. Maybe random waves of time distortion hitting the earth? Maybe they're randomly given off by the sun. Maybe they're from outside our Terran system and reach us in intervals. ???? Ti-i-i-ime, is on my side. Yes, it is!

Amazing. So easy to follow on such a complex topic. Very well described and broken down.

The best video I've seen on quantum mechanics in a long time!, wonderfully explained with thanks.

Very nice you put Ernest Rutherford as a pioneer of QM. He opened the door to it.

I love videos like this - historical backgrounds of how we found out about things. They make it so much easier to learn and understand how we understand the universe as of today. If there were videos like these thirty years ago, I might have been much better in school.

@dahleno2014

2 жыл бұрын

The history of scientific inquiry is of the utmost importance to learning, in my opinion. While many of the greats before us are far more intelligent than us, being able to at least see what they had to work with and what they come up with is amazing. Much of science builds upon itself over time, understanding how it was built is an amazing thing. Sadly, often in high school, you’re simply taught things so you can pass a test. Now that I’m in college, understanding these building blocks really helps put these things in perspective. Especially if they’re built on quantum mechanics.

Arvin--you are a total treasure on the internet. Thanks!

I just want to say I appreciate your videos, most of the time it’s hard for me to retain information with other videos, but for some reason your videos I can retain it very easily

Arvin, this video provides an awesome brief and succinct explanation. One of your, if not the best.

this video helped me finally understand Plancks constant. Thank you!.

Thank you for always sharing such fascinating things, you always have a video I look forward to watching. I hope you have a nice day, Arvin and crew :-)

Thanks Arvin ! Excellent video, I wish a lot of people would follow it to the end and understand the magic of quantum physics in our world/universe

Very well explained. Thank you!

Very well presented. Thanks for the instruction!

EXCELLENT video. from 9:21 through 11:30 timestamps perfectly resolves the alignment of the Schørdinger equation with relatively with Dirac's equation bringing my understanding of how MOTION plays into these distinctions. Although I have been immersed in this world for a while, until this episode I did not realize these dependencies and interactions with time and motion which had really been bothering me. I had been simply doing the "shut up and calculate" approach. No professors had shared this aspect to clarify that Dirac's equation HAD included that balance and how that led to QFT.

Yay Arvin. I enjoy these videos very much!

You explain v complex topics so smoothly. its just amazing, My Friend..!

One of the very best explanations of where we are and how we got here. Thank you.

Excellent Video SIr, Thank You

Thank you for sharing SOOO many helpful insights that alot of us wouldnt understand without having spent years studying this in depth

Found this channel on accident and I’m so happy I found it. I’m too curious a person to not try to understand some of this and this channel helps put some of that at ease

Amazing content, congratulations folks!!!

Thanks fr all ur amazing knowledge U r the best youtuber ever

Excellent video. Actually, I'd say it's a superb video, but many of your other videos are equally superb, so we have a tie with a plurality of your videos being in that superb position. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video. A must see video for everyone. Arvin, you are enlightening the world.

@anonp2958

2 жыл бұрын

His videos are great, however, enlightenment is not knowledge per se. One can not "teach" or "be taught" enlightenment. One can be told a particular definition of enlightenment but can not go to enlightenment classes.

@ellengran6814

2 жыл бұрын

We are made of this stuff...and we act both individually and collectivly.

What a wonderful explainer you are!

Yet another amazing video!

such a great video👏🏼

Best science illustrators out there

@sahelanthropusbrensis

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info

Absolutely amazing video! No surprise its arvin ash! Keep up ! Never stop!

Thank you ❣️ keep 'em coming

What a beautiful explanation!

Thank you for these amazing videos! What are your thoughts on Weyl's tile argument?

Love your channel from Bangladesh ❤️

This guy is a great teacher-I actually think I understand this stuff after watching this! Presentation is fantastic

Great video, as always.. 👍

Haven’t watched this video yet and I already know how good it is 🤩🤩🤩🤝💯❤️❤️

Very good explanations!

Always the best and the clearest scientist on the net ! Thanks from France 😉👍☀️

Your narrative, logical flow and graphics are superb. That makes this video a real pleasure to watch. You mention that relativity puts space and time on the same footing, but that we can only speak of probabilities. Yet if space was quantized with each "particle" moving at C no matter one's frame of reference probabilities would disappear. Whittaker's AETHER & ELECTRICITY makes a good case for this requirement.

Arvin, you explain these concepts soooo well. I wouldn't be surprised if one morning you premier a video announcing that you've developed your own Grand Unified Theory. Well done!

@carlorossi2788

2 жыл бұрын

there is un error

Music to my ears... 🎼🎶🎸 From India.

Great video sir🙏🙏

Thank You!!!!🙏

Your best video ( that I've seen). It's the best "next step" from high school physics and some of the headaches physics at that level can give you. This should be a part of high school physics. A little too much 'gee whiz' on the 2nd playing, but it's a start.

@vibaj16

2 жыл бұрын

I'm currently in high school physics and chemistry. So far physics is just classical physics, but chemistry is taught by the quantum model of things

I'd love to watch Arvin give this lecture in Copernacus' day and see what 2021 would be like

Wow - refreshing new episodes !!

Hi Arvin, thank you for your excellent informative videos!! Would you please consider doing a video on the Zeno and anti-Zeno effects?

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Good one! I put it on my list.

@Neo34014

Жыл бұрын

@@ArvinAsh you never did it ~1 year from the future

Boy you gotta love Arvin's style!!!! Go Arvin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Fun fact: it was fairly recently demonstrated that electron jumping shells is not instantaneous and takes time to occur.

Unbelievablely good explanation indeed. Wow wow wow 👏 😍 👌

Excellent sir

Arvin amazing your power of synthesis! ;)

They say "think big", but Plank thinked small and got the nobel. And I mean reaaaaally small.

Arvin Ash is an amazing instructor. His method of presentation is first class. There are other top-notch scientists like him but his presentation skills are rivaled by no-one. I also admire professor Al-khallil as well. We are in debt of the ones who teach us .professor Ash is among the very few on earth.

@themethodroath

2 жыл бұрын

he is in my top 5. Anton Petrov's channel is also amazing

@yad-thaddag

2 жыл бұрын

@@themethodroath Yeah, that's a great channel too. Other great channels are: - PBS Spacetime - Sabine Hossenfelder - Parth G - Up and Atom - Fermilab (with Don) - Physics Girl - Veritasium - The Science Asylum And there are probably more.

@felixgabby8801

2 жыл бұрын

@@themethodroath I find it insane how Anton Petrov hits us with a new video, based on science articles, from the latest research almost every single day of the week. I literally learn something new from that man every single day. I love him! lol This channel is awesome aswell! lol

@Posesso

2 жыл бұрын

Agree with everybody (I am wearing My Anton Petrov t-shirt I got two days ago :D) and just want to add ScienceClic English -> GoLd!! Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky -> Super good, MANY things

@compton2966

2 жыл бұрын

Since the first time I stumbled across your videos I liked and subscribed and haven’t missed any of them. You truly are a great teacher, thank you for your time and helping others to understand the most complex matters of the universe as we currently understand them.

Magellan sounds great! Will give it a go 🔥this was so interesting!

GREAT VIDEO

Congratulations, greetings from México City.

Fascinating stuff.

thank you

It encourages outsiders of physics like me to dive deeper into it every time I hear Arvin say the answer could be with someone looking at these videos. At present my thoughts on Heisenberg's UP are that its on shaky ground, concept of space needs redefinition, time for things inside refrigerator seemed like affected by lower temperatures but didn't and as discussed in other comments space-time bending due to gravity too looked circumspect. My mind sometimes thinks about a crazy thought of all points in space being located in one place only and able to communicate with each other instantaneously. May be this is BS as I am a novice in physics.

Greetings from New Zealand, I love this channel. Worth getting up at midnight to watch these videos!!

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Good morning my friend!

@ujjwalyadav8780

2 жыл бұрын

Lol 5 pm (evening) in india

Love the videos.

Top notch as always

My idea so I get to name it! Voyager 1 is now in interstellar TIME! (Mikey's Time) Think of it like Alvin and the chipmunks. "Vyger's" message is fine. It's just sped up now that it's outside our suns time bubble or "Terran Time." It would be faster still if "Vyger" sent a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. That name is still up for grabs. Outside the Local Group TIME is open, too. Now that "Vyger" is in interstellar space, it's also in the Milky Way's STANDARD, faster moving, interstellar TIME or "Mikey's Time." •Our sun's TIME bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured. •Milky Way's TIME bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until Vyger is outside the Ort cloud .007-.07% faster, maybe. Just for reference. •Local Group's TIME bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. Used just for reference. •Outside any influence in True interstellar TIME: Name still open and unknown. ???? Here is where surfing time is SO choice. A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about. Pass it on, please and thank you.

Very good information 🙏🙏🙏🙏

This was cool. I'm writing a book about the idea of T-symmetry being misunderstood as a single type of symmetry, rather than two distinct and separate ones that have been lumped together by our inability to perceive their differences in a meaningful way-- and not only what happens when we can perceive them, but what happens when they get manipulated. So I love seeing stuff like this :>

Waiting to see this

Impossible to explain something that even top physicists can't agree on in just a few minutes. But this is the best I have seen! 👍

Love this guy!

It surprised me that the order mismatch between space and time was fixed by making each spacial dimension only only a first order derivative. I expected it to go the other way, with time becoming a second order partial derivative. The first thing I see when looking at the Shrodinger equation is the heat equation: U_t = k(U_xx + U_yy + U_zz) first partial in time is proportional the sum of the second partial of each spacial dimension. This is the first equation I remember working with when I took partial differential equations. The second equation that my PDifEqu course focused on after the heat equation was the wave equation: U_tt = k(U_xx + U_yy + U_zz) This looks almost identical to the heat equation except that time is a second order partial derivative just like the spacial dimensions.

Wow Avinash. God bless you

Amazing video

5:00 frequency does not need to be an integer, it is still continuous

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Integer multiple of PLANCK's constant. Frequency, of course, can be any number.

@deenial

2 жыл бұрын

@@ArvinAsh But Arvin, the formula is E = h*f, and f is not integer, therefore I don't understand your statement. Where is the integer?

That was great

Oh, mic drop at the end of this video Arvin. Boom!!!

Sir, Please make a video on Dirac Equation.

The only thing cooler than your videos is your soundtrack leading up to “that’s coming right up….” Please extend it like by 2 secs

The main thing is that empty space time would only exist without QM.Yeah & that is proved by the scientists & beautifully explained by you.Thank u Arvin Sir

@goasthmago6354

2 жыл бұрын

what does empty space time mean ? space time is a human inventiom, it's a geometric construct

Atomic nuclei are immersed in a fluid (the Aether) and what's quantized is their harmonic mode of oscillation. Go look up Laplace's special functions for spherical harmonics and you can see that they produce an exact match for observed atomic orbitals, leading to the conclusion that the electron cloud being observed is the fluid which has been excited by the nucleus oscillating at resonant frequencies. That is why there is no perceptible transition when "orbital" changes occur, because the electrons don't have to move from one orbit to another , they are already there ready to react to any harmonic changes.

Easy to understand

Hi Arvin, Why wouldn't it be the case that spacetime itself is quantized into gravitons? The behavior of a graviton would reflect physics behavior. (A) A graviton would expand from a point into a sphere of radius r = speed of light * time (just like in the derivation of time dilation), (just like the expansion of the big bang). (B) A graviton is the carrier of all of the physics constants; which makes it a calibrated mechanism. (C) Wave functions are gravitons, gravitons are wave functions. By being a carrier of the physics constants, a graviton exists. If a wave function is the a graviton and a graviton is a carrier of the physics constants, then wave functions are the carriers of the physics constants, which endows them with "existence". If you know that, and you know that a quantum entanglement can be described by a wave function,then you know that a quantum entanglement is a graviton. Therefore, you can isolate a graviton as easily as you can isolate quantum entangled photons. By making these simple distinctions, you can avoid all of the theories that don't work/are not testable (superstring theory, loop quantum gravity, twistors, m theory); you can avoid all of the fairy tale theories, and you can work with the actual building blocks of spacetime. Once you know what spacetime is made of, you can start to think about a real version of the Alcubierre drive. You can think about building a real warp drive. Does anyone here want to build a warp drive?

Hi Ash New subscriber here. Great videos. I looked you up in Spotify and found nothing. Do you have any podcast? If you don't, you should. Keep up the good work

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Stay tuned. We are just getting started in setting up a podcast. We should have something in about a week.

great sir

Beautiful design by the Great Architect.

Very good

Thank you, I love this. QFT is consistent with my theory that there is only one infinite thing that always is, always was and always will be. This one infinite thing is conscious and intelligent and creates everything by natural laws, some we know and some not as yet discovered. One undiscovered law is the law of creation as applied to life. We may never know how it works, but we can see it work. The analogy of the human body gives us clues. The human has a unique relationship and function, possessing creativity and free will, communicating with the Infinite One, and choosing what it wants the Infinite One to create. Communication with the Infinite One is by true belief as expressed through emotions, thoughts and actions. Humans have tried to explain the Infinite One and in doing so created religion which missed the point, but in some ways was very close. Oh well, happy hunting. Loved your video and presentation.

It's a privilege to live in a time where we understand so much but still realize we understand very little.

One thing I've always wondered that no one ever seems to ask in videos like this... Is it really the photons themselves that are quantized, or is it only a behavior of electrons around an atomic nuclei? Things to ponder... A redshifted photon in a gravitational field. Does it shift it's frequency in discrete steps, or is it just that electrons won't accept other than discrete amounts of energy to become excited (in our detectors)? Just think about how much more sense everything would make if it's the electron that's the culprit. That would explain why we think of light in terms of wave-particle duality, when it's really just a wave. It would imply that the wavefunction in quantum mechanics is something real and physical. And it would explain why we can only talk about probabilities, and not predict the outcome with certainty. It would explain entanglement without any magic. All those things and more.

@thedeemon

2 жыл бұрын

A photon can have any energy from a continuous spectrum, and gravitational redshift is a fine way to change photon's energy and frequency by any amount, gradually. A free moving electron also can have any energy from a continuous spectrum. It's only in bound states like an atom the set of eigenstates becomes discrete and the set of possible energy levels discrete.

@alexanderhugestrand

2 жыл бұрын

@@thedeemon So, in plain english, are you saying that I'm right? To me that would be evidence that it's still possible in this day to use reason and only basic knowledge to come to good conclusions (inflating my ego, feels good). 😆👍 Wouldn't that imply that the statement in this video that "particles are exitations of the field" could be a bit misleading? I don't know what such an exitation would look like, other than as a bump in a computer generated 3D grid. Is it short lived and temporary, like an interaction between two "particles"? Or is permanent, as in "the particle is there with a well defined position all the time"? The latter sounds wrong.

@thedeemon

2 жыл бұрын

@@alexanderhugestrand The problem is, in QM and QFT we've got some very abstract equations and those equations give us some numeric predictions that are confirmed well in experiments, but we still don't really understand what exactly those equations mean, what thing they describe. This is why QM has many interpretations. Is a wave function actually real or just a mathematical tool that we use? Different interpretations answer differently, so we don't really know. If you open an actual textbook on quantum field theory, you'll find that the fields there and the very notion of a particle are all super abstract maths. All pop-sci youtube videos try to turn those abstract ideas into something more visual and intuitive but the process is too lossy, the result has little resemblance with the actual QFT, and then viewers build their own ideas and interpretations based on these fairy tales. In plain QM a wave function Ψ(x) assigns to every point x in space a complex number. It encodes a superposition of all possible states where the particle "is" at point x, with weights (amplitudes) Ψ(x). In QFT a quantum field F(x) assigns to every point x in space a quantum operator that can act on a state vector and return another state vector. Such operator is expressed as a combination of particle creation and annihilation operators. A single particle creation operator changes a given state vector by increasing the number of particles in it with given properties (like momentum and spin). The state vector belongs to an infinite dimensional Fock space and encodes a superposition of all possible many-particle wave functions. This stuff might have some sense mathematically but good luck explaining it to laymen and drawing it in a video. How do you even start visualising a field made of operators, i.e. functions? So the poor pop-sci video creators make some much simpler tales and interpretations, but don't try to take these literally, this is really misleading.

@alexanderhugestrand

2 жыл бұрын

@@thedeemon I have no idea what those functions you talk about look like, but since I'm an experienced programmer with a leaning towards math, I know how I would like to think of them at least. They must describe complex interactions and their likelihood at every point? I've for a long time thought of the double slit experiment like two wavefronts (of wavelets, or photons) that cross and become superimposed. In the simplest of cases (linear interaction) this only creates an interference pattern. In other cases the interactions become nonlinear and more complex. Especially when a light wave meets an electron (wave). At any point in space where they overlap there's a chance of some interaction. I guess that's the scenarios those operator fields describe? It's truly fascinating and I can speculate forever. But I suppose I'll leave it at that. It gives me a feeling of understanding without having to know every little detail. Thanks for the info anyway!

@nmarbletoe8210

Жыл бұрын

I figure it's both. The electron orbits are quantized due to their "standing wave" nature. But if light were not also quantized then an electron transition could produce 1, 2, 3.839, or even 1/19,293 photons. Instead, it produces one.

Hello Arvin Can you please make a video about the fabric of spacetime itself? What is the nature of it, is it like a grid on which energy vibrates and creates particles? Is it made of something we still don’t know, could it be that it has its own laws of physics which we cannot understand yet. We know it can bend and stretch, but can it be compressed? Since at on point in time it was fully compressed into a single point can we still somehow compress the fabric of spacetime and what will happen to the matter in that region? Will everything be compressed along with that scale.

@thedeemon

2 жыл бұрын

It's really a figure of speech, a way to talk about very abstract math equations. We don't really know what it's "made of". The question might not have any good answer, like you can't really say what a wall in a computer game is made of. It's not bricks or wood, it's just an abstraction drawn on the screen and you call it a wall because it looks like a wall to you. It's made of immaterial numbers and algorithms. So is the "fabric of spacetime", just a convenient image to talk about.

I'm curious about the longevity of enegy in the microwave backround radiation. How does something so old survive this long? How does it not decay? A layman like myself could be forgiven for thinking, "well if the radiation from billions of years bumps into something it's going to be absorbed not reflected, and if it doesn't collide with anything it will be too far away by now for us to detect", so how do get that nice oval map that is always shown telling us about its distribution.

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

The CMB is almost everywhere in the sky, and it still has a lot of energy. This energy however, will decrease over time, but it will never theoretically disappear because the background temperature will never be absolute zero. For practical purposes though, it will become almost undetectable after about 1 trillion years.

Arvin why isn't second order time treated like second order space in equations? (I.e. t squared isn't considered a plane like x squared). Seems like time only ticks when it gets squared.