Why Modi Is Pouring Billions Into This Ancient Indian City | WSJ Breaking Ground
India is at a political crossroads and Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government are pouring billions into a project that will make Ayodhya a hub for religious tourism. A new $220 million temple called the Ram Mandir sits at the center of the plan to construct a nearly $4 billion “Hindu Vatican.”
WSJ explains the projects and looks at how the plan has been dividing the secular country while providing Modi with political gain ahead of the next election.
Chapters:
0:00 Modi’s plan
0:47 Why they are building
2:22 Historical challenges
4:27 Geopolitics
Breaking Ground digs into megaprojects around the world, uncovering what these developments might mean for the surrounding region and the ultimate costs.
#India #Modi #WSJ
Пікірлер: 4 500
India’s economic boom faces an urgent pitfall: sharing the wealth: on.wsj.com/3UPLhdC
@user-qt9xd5xe7g
12 күн бұрын
How many CCP money has been gobbled up under project 1376 ?
@hetalsinghal8585
12 күн бұрын
BJP 400+ Jai shree ram🙏❤
@Sam-yt9qj
12 күн бұрын
Poor reporting riddles with so many factual inaccuracies. They found one sad-looking person full of communist ideology and the entire narrative is based on his own feelings about India. This report is no different from the Freedom Index or V-dem report on India which ranks Afghanistan and Pakistan higher than India in certain categories. Propaganda at its peak. No wonder the external affairs Minister of India Dr. Jaishankar accused the western media of biases
@jesaxjestino
12 күн бұрын
Only Bjp Jai See Ram
@unitycatalog
12 күн бұрын
@@TenTimesSun don't come crying for visas
Modi didn't built it, we the Hindu people built it with our donation 🙂
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMA
12 күн бұрын
Aisa mat socho ham hindu hai isliye bach jaengeAur laga ki tum jaise youth hi desh ka Bhavivysaya aur ye politics kitna brainwashed rakh rahi hai ham youth koAaj muslaman maar kha raha kal kisaan kha raha tha ek din jab sawal poochona choge to ham bhi kahenegeAur phir tumhe lagega bahut der ho gayiYe neta log politics ko isliye hi aisa rakhte hai taaki ham jaise youths inki taraf na dekheHam reels ke comment kattar hindu likhne mein busy rahenge aur ye log desh ka bantadhar karne mein lage rahenge🎉
@shayanraj7840
12 күн бұрын
They need to hide that
@ASM-tl9xt
12 күн бұрын
Yeah they said that in the video at 4:01
@anandmishra5796
12 күн бұрын
@@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMAdesh sahi line mein hain , so please stop your propaganda , World bank ,IMF , S&P and other world institutions indian nhi aur na hi India ke influence mein data release karte hain aur unke prediction postive hain india ke future ko le ke so , 1000 problems hain india mein aur ham Indian usko solve kar lenge ,tum waha hindu , Muslims kar rahe ho baised tareeke se , jo Hindus ke against hue hain West Bengal mein usko nahi bol skte , jo muslims stone pelting karte hain , CAA anti-seculer hain but UCC anti-seculer hadd hoti hain dogalepana ki , Bangladesh, afganistan aur Pakistan ke minority ko citizenship dena national security ko khatra hain magar Rohingyas ko flat dena deshhit mein , so apne propoganda ko batti banao aur gaal lo
@SaurabhMishra-rv4dk
12 күн бұрын
@@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMAमुझे लगता है या तो आप दीमगा से खाली है या आप पक्का रवीश कुमार या ध्रुव राठी को सुनती है। दीदी असल में वही लोग आप जैसें लोगो का brain wash कर रहे हैं। वे लोग वामपंथी हैं और वे आप को डरा कर ही अपना अस्तित्व बचाते हैं।
Mosque was not built on ruins rather it was built by demolishing the temple.
@akhripasta2670
9 күн бұрын
Left it's pillars & foundation intact & used it for the mosque
@shubhamkashyap4682
8 күн бұрын
They can't tell that,,, Western hypocrisy...
@lestergutierrez2816
7 күн бұрын
That was common to muslim to build on top of other religious buildings to show the superiority of islamic colonialism. Maldives allow only muslims to live there and the media don't care about islamic countries under sharia, but they get offended about Hindu countries .
@medintar676
7 күн бұрын
That was for political purpose just like now
@Dudsky
7 күн бұрын
They have to run their propaganda, right?
Colonizers of America is giving lectures to other countries 😅😂
@amineboum9493
6 күн бұрын
yeah pagans
@PeaceKiller-gq4ft
5 күн бұрын
@@amineboum9493 yeah barbaric abrahmic cults
@vampyrexxx
5 күн бұрын
@@amineboum9493yeah butttttthurtttttt why so much pain ?? 😂😂😂
@vinitagupta7670
5 күн бұрын
@@vampyrexxxit’s not pain. He is showing you the mirror
@vinitagupta7670
5 күн бұрын
British settlers became Americans and continued their colonisation, finished the Red Indian population
India cannot be a Hindu nation but Kashmir can be a Muslim territory. There is no problem in that contradictions
@rvind000
5 күн бұрын
Even tho 'Hindu' itself orignally is a geographically term used by persians & beyond, originating from 'Sapt Sindhu', land of the 7 rivers.
@deenvadh4199
4 күн бұрын
@@rvind000 So we can't choose to own it? What's the problem with that? I think it's great that the land is the basis of civilizational identity - for all indigenous Dharmic philosophies to identify with the name of the land, in harmony. No?
Govt. didn't paid for the temple, we made it via our donations😅
@googleGuy44
10 күн бұрын
No, the hundreds of engineers and architects did. The donors only provided the money
@cla782
10 күн бұрын
@@googleGuy44then what? All payments was done by Hindu organization and trust 😊
@pastaboiii3324
9 күн бұрын
Fr how stupid do they gotta be to be thinking that a government would build a religious institution with tax-payer money from a secular country. WSJ is not a reliable source at all 👎
@mk-rh5kt
9 күн бұрын
Its possible because of PM Modi
@niftybank7
9 күн бұрын
@@googleGuy44without the money would they do it ?
Western Propoganda & Jealousy 🤡
@usaanthems1295
10 күн бұрын
Yeah sure. We are so jealous of your slums.
@Mayank-fg6ep
10 күн бұрын
@@usaanthems1295Look out at our infrastructure built just in last one year. Even a Coconut and Fruit Seller accepts digital payments here. 😂😂😂
@Hummus-se3xy
10 күн бұрын
@@usaanthems1295western hypocrisy
@dragoon14270
10 күн бұрын
@@usaanthems1295 at least our house is not made up of material which can break easily on punching
@Tsarthak
10 күн бұрын
@@usaanthems1295 20 year old propaganda is still on your mind. do your country have UPI
Its our land... Not your ... We gave muslims two part of our land... Pakistan and Bangladesh. India is Hindu. Our land our culture our temples.
@nazeerpasha2075
8 күн бұрын
What do you mean by being a Hindu?
@mayurpatil8918
7 күн бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 Sanatani.
@hitchcock8653
7 күн бұрын
What about other people who don't follow Hinduism. India is a secular country.not Hindu nor any religious. these toxic thoughts in your mind is the victory of BJP where religion is used to gain the majority support from people and rule (destroy) our country. Just like the British did in past days
@msdolly6101981
7 күн бұрын
@@hitchcock8653: India was is and will always be birth place of sanatan. All the 4 dharmic religions were born here. Indira Gandhi under emergency added the word secular in our constitution. If India is secular first bring UCC. Also secular doesn't mean destroying the heritage of the land. Abrahamic religion don't belong to Indian subcontinent, they came from outside. Constitution has given all citizens the freedom to follow any religion, that doesn't mean roots and civilization of India will be destroyed. Just like Vatican, Bethlehem, mecca madina exist as birth place of those religion, India exist as birth place of all dharmic religions.
@filmwood7979
7 күн бұрын
@@hitchcock8653 india is secular bcoz Hindus are secular, you should go to your Pakistan & Bangladesh if you have problem
Unlike Western countries, India is a civilizational state. Preserving and re-establishing the monuments of this ancient civilization is important for all Indians who don't identify with external invaders
@bartelgrant
6 күн бұрын
At some point in history the Hindus themselves were the invaders of what is now India.
Typical western commentary without mentioning archaeological evidences.
@Bittuji-oi3xe
7 күн бұрын
What's your problem if we are developing a city to a advance stage
@granand
7 күн бұрын
@@Bittuji-oi3xeI guess you meant this comment to be for the video
@ripsanskrit3609
6 күн бұрын
They didn't lie tho
@HonestSatish
5 күн бұрын
@@ripsanskrit3609but hid crucial perception creating facts.
@ohnoanyway7791
5 күн бұрын
@@ripsanskrit3609 but they hide the truth also. It's called half truth and cherry picking to propagate your idea.
Ayodhya is not Hindu Vatican, just like how Vatican is not Christian Ayodhya.
@akk424
11 күн бұрын
👍🏼
@covfefe1787
11 күн бұрын
it technically is because the Vatican is older than the current temple and its vision. The ancient temple was not the center of Hinduism unlike the current plan for Ayodhya to be the capital of hindusim.
@7hroomy
11 күн бұрын
Based
@EvropaAeternvm
11 күн бұрын
True, but by calling it that gives people who read or subscribe to the Wall Street journal who tend to be western an idea of its importance to Hindus,much like how the Vatican is for catholics.
@gauravshukla75
11 күн бұрын
@@covfefe1787it is not .. technically or otherwise . Vatican was apolitical set up with no spiritual significance other than the fact that Christians did not have access to the lands on which Christ lived . This is actually the birthplace of Ram - with a temple which was destroyed and a mosque built to humiliate the locals . You should know history and faith before drawing parallels which make no sense .
America itself is controversial country
You guys being foreigner to indian culture can never see hindutva from its original prospective. You just see Hinduism from your Abrahamic religious prospective where 2 religion can not peacefully coexist.
Ayodhya is older than Vatican. Hinduism is older than Christianity. But it is Hindu Vatican Project.
@jayantkumar4542
12 күн бұрын
Well said brother!
@rohitprajapati9720
11 күн бұрын
jokes on them... kids belonging to some years old religiion teach about wht is good and whts is not...on other hand they kill people in name of religion...
@Editsdevil
11 күн бұрын
This is how the west tries to control us culturally
@niramu63
11 күн бұрын
Western media - time started from A.D. For Hindus, civilization is several millennium old.
@sonicblare
11 күн бұрын
Clever. But whatever the name, the largest democracy in the world standing for a religion is troubling. Secular republic is more of a text book topic than a reality
Man …Western media really can’t tolerate India developing and prospering 😅…
@Fgma744
8 күн бұрын
Bruh what?
@LiberalNehru
8 күн бұрын
Their mind is Bhot ajib I cant explain its like dunia mc thi hai aur rahegi they think what they are thinking is only correct
@nareshsinghal2327
8 күн бұрын
True
@RojaJaneman
8 күн бұрын
Report the video as misinformation. Write to editors if u have something to say. Don’t just write a comment. Take real action
@Aniket2712
8 күн бұрын
you saying this ... makes you as worst as western media also, you call this development? a stupid temple?
Indian govt take millions of rupees from only the Hindu temples. In India only Hindu temples pay taxes others don't. So it should be Govt first priority to develop and beautify our Hindu temples, cities and places. Bcz only Hindu temples are paying taxes. Other's not.
Vatican City got nothing with Jesus Christ. But Lord Ram was born on Ayodhya.
Gov didn't spend a single penny. We donate for our temple.
@nazeerpasha2075
10 күн бұрын
Why in North India?
@Shaurya_Pant
10 күн бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 Because Ram was born in North India.
@ankursingh8963
10 күн бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 because it's birth place for lord Rama
@user-jz1ei1qn8v
10 күн бұрын
Brother I think 1 rs is donated by government ❤❤❤❤❤
@cla782
10 күн бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075muslim madarsa graduate spotted 😅😂 Hindu kings in the South were so powerful that Muslims could not capture them and wherever Ram ji set foot in the South, there is a temple.😊What was left in the North was completed😊
A Vatican or Mecca can exist, but Ayodhya is controversial 😅
@asingh7608
12 күн бұрын
So true 🤣🤪
@king-bw7zm
12 күн бұрын
Are sab paise ka khel hai Babu bhaiya 😂😂😂
@sooriapragass1088
12 күн бұрын
Made controversial by mugals and present day mugals
@badluck5647
12 күн бұрын
Ayodhya and Dome of the Rock are controversial for building on top of another's holy site. The Vatican and Mecca don't do that.
@Geopolitics-gt4fb
12 күн бұрын
@@badluck5647Your knowledge is very limited about India's history or you got influenced by Islamic propaganda, go and read about Indian history where invaders Mughals said that they break temples to build mosques. And it's our land and pride that we take back.
Babri mosque was not built on ruins of ancient temple, but it was built by demolishing it and this is just one such case of out of thousands in Indian sub-continent.
Initially Temple was demolished and mosque was built
At least jews will feel safe in India compared to America.
@isleephungry
12 күн бұрын
Apart from cows no one is safe in India😂
@gt122388
12 күн бұрын
@@isleephungry your mom would be safe as well :)
@whysoserious7553
12 күн бұрын
@@isleephungryabdul from beggarstan 🇵🇰🥣
@siddharthverma1249
11 күн бұрын
@@isleephungrygoats are safe too Abdul, do not panic
@lifePaultheball
11 күн бұрын
@@isleephungry Allah ❌ Hoor supplier ✔️ Mohammad Rasulullah ❌ Baccha Baz ✔️
Cry Western Media! Cry
@abhijeetsingh1306
11 күн бұрын
😂🤣🤣😂exactly
@Yourking645
11 күн бұрын
@@grapesurgeon ohh don't be sad child 😂😂
@phoenixj1299
11 күн бұрын
@@grapesurgeonthis video shows that your kind is screaming.
@rupeshagarwal5896
11 күн бұрын
@@3limabeanplease dont come
@PankajPassi-vs9td
11 күн бұрын
@@3limabeanhaha ok NAMAZI pappu
America is a third world country with a lot of money.😂 - someone
Jerusalem is for Christians what Ayodhya is for Hindus. To oversimplify it. Yeah, same story. Some people from middle east invaded, tore down the historical structures and institutions, installed their own symbols and claimed it their own.
I am not a HINDU but i want ask you about something....When Vivek Ramaswamy was asked about his Religion in Media and People were discussing not to vote him because he is not Christian and he should be converted to get votes....and we all know why he lost...How beautiful and secular was that and these people are talking about secularism 😂😂😂😂 Hypocrisy ki bhi seema hoti h...par western media ke propoganda ki toh seema, rekha, jaya aur sushma bhi hoti hai 😜😜😜😜
@greymatter9400
9 күн бұрын
Oh yaa because he was hindu thats y he lost ofc
@Shawn_mike34
8 күн бұрын
USA is doomed anyway.
@LiberalNehru
8 күн бұрын
They think Our Agenda our agenda your agenda is Against human rights
@shashwatkumaratul1886
8 күн бұрын
@@Rothminacah_aminnotphbecauuse they dont vote or join any national party and also we have dynastic Gandhi family and they continue to lunch theirs family members
@mayurharge2339
8 күн бұрын
@@Rothminacah_aminnotph wait for your carasmatic leader shri annamalai in next 20 years will definitely be the prime minister
India..with 85% hindus..during freedom...was made secular.. till now its secular. Pakistan with 85% muslims...was declared an islamic nation. Thats the difference. Islam wasnt born in pakistan..but pakistan is rightfully islamic nation. Hinduism was born in India..but India cannot built its own hindu temple which was demolished during islamic invasion! Wow. Hypocrisy at its peak
@osmanmohammed6304
11 күн бұрын
Islam Started Education!! Now Everyone importance of Edu. Arab oil rich countries changed the economy of all Asian countries!! That’s Gift of God Almighty!! Open Phenomenon!! Not Mysterious World!! Science unfolding many Facts!! No Divinity in Nature!! God Almighty Tests Mankind To Discover Unseen Allah/God. God Giver of all blessings!! Signs of God is everywhere!
@Ab-cj8bs
11 күн бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304yaa we know what your education teaches to create hamas isis alqaeda Taliban
@madhubala7975
11 күн бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304 ur reply shows u dont have education. See indias history. When education started in india!!! Come on...this much of ignorance?!
@amanvi123
10 күн бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304 you r blinded by religion.
@bobrik335
10 күн бұрын
Very Good Point.
Where is archaeological evidence submitted by Archaeological survey of India in supreme court?? Did u mention about pillars and temple remains found in excavation? Another thing, Temple was funded by public through door to door collection and via online payments from all over India. No Govt money has been invested in it. Despite knowing It was place of temple and mosque was built on demolition of temple... Still we gave Muslims 5 acre of land in same City to built mosque. Ask them are they doing the same in Pakistan, Bangladesh or Afghanistan??
Modi havent pour money in it, devotee donated money for temple
AYODHYA IS NOT VATICAN -- AYODHYA IS AYODHYA
@1Human1First1
5 күн бұрын
This is the superiority complex west has on east. Until they reached to loot India West did not even know to wear clothes, and these people have so much of supremacy complex on Africa and East Asians, who taught them how to live.
@pandurangasettyvenu7897
4 күн бұрын
Infact Vatican is christian ayodhya.
@varun2250
3 күн бұрын
@@pandurangasettyvenu7897Atluntadi manatoni 💪
Christian - Vatican, Jews - Jerusalem, Muslims - Mecca Hindu - Oh, we are SECULAR, if we build our Temple, "Minorities" will get Offended 🤗
@omniyambot9876
12 күн бұрын
only catholics are to vatican
@ntarctica
12 күн бұрын
Al Jazeera, WSJ, BBC s not Muslims
@badluck5647
12 күн бұрын
Because there is no controversy on holy sites in Jerusalem?
@artman12
11 күн бұрын
@@ntarctica They still follow the ji hadi thought
@rohitprajapati9720
11 күн бұрын
@@y57575 lol jokes on palestinian who kicked out from jerusalem..
After reading Comments box ☑️🎁 "Mera desh Badal raha hai". India 🇮🇳 is capable for giving best reply to Western Propagandist.
Using ' mostly muslims' is a must thing in western reports.
pathetic to see WSJ's biased and racist journalism
@humbleindian6303
10 күн бұрын
Please make US and Britain secular , only 2% of your population comprises of minority religions
@JacobMoretti-NotABot
10 күн бұрын
How is it biased?
@jaig
10 күн бұрын
@@JacobMoretti-NotABot WSJ is all about ROI.
@Proud-NEPALI
8 күн бұрын
How is it racist can you explain Lindu?
@aksin5178
8 күн бұрын
@@Proud-NEPALI asli ID se aa abdullah
Mecca - Not controversial Ayodhya - Controversial
@JacobMoretti-NotABot
10 күн бұрын
Yes because India is a democracy, unlike Saudi Arabia which is an autocratic state.
@atharvatar
10 күн бұрын
@@JacobMoretti-NotABot that is such a dumb reason. It can be controversial for the opposition parties, but third parties should be neutral.
@JacobMoretti-NotABot
10 күн бұрын
@@atharvatar it’s super interesting to watch the dynamics in the comments section lol
@phaneeshkashyap2348
10 күн бұрын
@@JacobMoretti-NotABotthe place of religious worship is not secular by definition genius 😂.
@JacobMoretti-NotABot
9 күн бұрын
@@atharvatar what I understand the original post to be saying is that it’s strange that Mecca is not controversial but Ayodhya is. Am I understanding the original post incorrectly?
Can u count any Hindu Monuments in today’s Pakistan?
This is not controversial.....its our history ...jai shree ram
Anti-India Propaganda showing its color
@sowmitriswamy6718
11 күн бұрын
Being Indian, why is this anti-Indian. The temple is built, but the Hindutva movement is not done as yet and we do not know whether it will breed an attitude of intolerance (like Pakistan is today) or simply be uniting Hindus and remaking their religious practices common to all Hindus. The latter is welcome, the former is not.
@krishnaa9571
11 күн бұрын
@@sowmitriswamy6718 Hindutva stands for casteless society and uniting all Hindus!
@ignitehope
11 күн бұрын
@@sowmitriswamy6718both sides claim outrage.
@amateur_football9751
10 күн бұрын
@@sowmitriswamy6718Easy, he is a Modi fanboy!!
@user-ef5pj3mc7y
10 күн бұрын
They are just crying of jealousy 😭
•First, If Muslim don't follow secular credentials than why Hindu follow secularism ! •Second, During Islamic invasion of India many ancient temples were demolished and built arabic structures (mosque) on razed Hindu sits. Now Hindus are Reclaimed thier land from illegal occupation by legal system (court). •Third, Ayodhya is not Hindu vactican or Muslim makka or madina. Still u can find 170 mosques in Ayodhya & Court give separate land for new mosque construction as well. This is show highly tolerance in Hinduism & ancient Indian spirituality.
@jatinpareek4563
7 күн бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤
@aventikasaxena1197
7 күн бұрын
Ayodhya is a part of our culture, a base of our beliefs and holds a great place in our history. It is an emotion and much more than a Hindu Vatican. You're right.
@doublesman0
6 күн бұрын
Good to hear
@bartelgrant
6 күн бұрын
1) you should always be the best example yourself rather than looking at others and then lowering yourself to their level 2) The Islamic conquest of India was so long ago. If every country were adjusting their borders or religions based on something that happened 500 years ago the world would be in a constant war. You really need to just let go, deal with history and just leave things as they are, rather than creating problems out of thin air. 3) if there were so much tolerance then there wouldn't be any anti-muslim riots we've seen so many times.
@jatinpareek4563
6 күн бұрын
@@bartelgrant you know what , just stay out of our internal matters,, inda is democracy we decide what we do ,, dont tell us about history ,, Westners lecturing indians on history is a joke ,, in ancient karma theory ,, every action has an equal and opposite reaction wether that action must have been done 1000 years ago ,, nature and god does not forget anything,, you have to pay what you have done ,, in this life or next life , u cant escape karma ,, what ever u see in present is the result of past ,, it is our responsibility to cure the historical problems so that our next generation will not suffer,, i hope u will understand.
We Hindu donated the money, government did not spent a single rupee.
India becoming a hindu rastra soon 🙏🔥🇮🇳🚩
For Christian Vatican is OK For Muslim Mekkah is OK But for us Hindus Ayodhya is controversial 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Who the fukc give u permission to make a video about our Holy Place Ayodhya #JoyShreeRam 🙏🙏
@niht9240
11 күн бұрын
For this biased media 📰: It's acceptable that Muslim Mecca stands, despite the site originally being an ancient polytheistic temple that was razed and demolished by Muhammad, who then built a mosque over it. Yet, they don't point out any controversy or unfairness here.However, they don't have the guts to raise any questions about it, knowing well that they could face severe repercussions, including blasphemy accusations, the very next day. On the other hand, when Hindus reclaimed their temple site, where the Babri Mosque had been constructed by demolishing one of the most sacred Hindu temples by the Mughal Terrorist Babur, it is suddenly deemed controversial. Wow! What type of journalism is this LOL
@user-hf4jz8uj5n
11 күн бұрын
Ram isn't going to give us jobs. He is as real as superman, as real as Spiderman. Also, ram left his wife Sita after he won the fight against ravana
@jameschristophercirujano6650
11 күн бұрын
It's called freedom of speech, much like how you can associate Vatican for Christianity, Vatican is only for Catholics, the other Christian sects have different central places of worship. You're wrong, but you're free to talk BS. You also have to remember WSJ has liberal western values, us in Asia are generally more conservative, so having religion as part of our culture, and politics, isn't exactly as frowned upon, as it is over in the West.
@SUNNYDAY-if8yo
11 күн бұрын
@@jameschristophercirujano6650 rice bag rant
@asianman7232
10 күн бұрын
@@jameschristophercirujano6650leave these opiod addicts alone
India didn't become secular in 1947. The word "secular" was forced into Constitution in 1973 by Congress govt for pleasing Muslims for votes.
@user-fc6cr2rb2r
10 күн бұрын
Proud to be ur brother
@sriharshacv7760
10 күн бұрын
Indira Gandhi is one of the worst PMs India had.
@testprofile1840
10 күн бұрын
yes even our original constituion has ram ji's pic on it's front page
@adolft_official
10 күн бұрын
Praud of Ram Temple built using Chinese Cranes
@The-Universe-Facts
10 күн бұрын
#AndhaBhagat
As a resident of ayodhya, the change in the town's infrastructure has been phenomenal but more than anything it was going to shree ram's mandir that meant that most, having seen ram lala in the tent as a child and then years later in his grand temple brought me to tears, i do not care for the politics around the temple, seeing my lord in his temple was the only thing that mattered and i see nothing wrong with that and will not be told otherwise.
Jay Shree Ram from Ayodhya 🚩
I'm unsubscribing this Anti Hindu and anti India propoganda machine. 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
@batosato
11 күн бұрын
🤣 truth is bitter
@notKhalid
11 күн бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@simriths.s5976
11 күн бұрын
@notKhalid Without lies Islam dies 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@sarath_babu
11 күн бұрын
@@batosato tell me the truth, then
@ekesshtks
11 күн бұрын
If possible please tweet this mentioning @NilanjanUdwin
Why is it controversial for a Hindu Country to have a strong Hindu presence? I think this is racism to suggest we can’t have anything good.
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMA
12 күн бұрын
Aisa mat socho ham hindu hai isliye bach jaengeAur laga ki tum jaise youth hi desh ka Bhavivysaya aur ye politics kitna brainwashed rakh rahi hai ham youth koAaj muslaman maar kha raha kal kisaan kha raha tha ek din jab sawal poochona choge to ham bhi kahenegeAur phir tumhe lagega bahut der ho gayiYe neta log politics ko isliye hi aisa rakhte hai taaki ham jaise youths inki taraf na dekheHam reels ke comment kattar hindu likhne mein busy rahenge aur ye log desh ka bantadhar karne mein lage rahenge😊
@neodenz
12 күн бұрын
That isn't what's wrong here. The BJP is just pushing out all other religions, and putting Hinduism in the forefront. Other religious minorities also exist and have existed for thousands of years.
@Anilsharma12364
12 күн бұрын
@@neodenzI see nothing wrong with Hinduism being prominent in India as of not India, where will hindusm be prominent?
@alphacompany4837
12 күн бұрын
Secular country *
@Anilsharma12364
12 күн бұрын
@@alphacompany4837 as mandated by who?
Hinduism Sanatan and India 🇮🇳 Grows Together
westerners still telling us how we should live in our own country.
We Indians hate appeasement secularism..
@NotAbhaiiibyeee
6 күн бұрын
Speak for yourself. It’s not “we”it’s “you”.
@amangupta2905
5 күн бұрын
@@NotAbhaiiibyeeeeveryone hates that here
@yogidhamijakonde
5 күн бұрын
👍
@lifePaultheball
5 күн бұрын
@@NotAbhaiiibyeee We do too. A lot of people wouldn't say it on your face but will show you when the election results are out.
@NotAbhaiiibyeee
5 күн бұрын
@@amangupta2905 speak for yourself. I agree with what you say.
Its not Indias vatican, vatican is theirs ayodhya.😎
@LiberalNehru
8 күн бұрын
Ge baat 😏💪
Wall Street Prestitute at its best!!😂😂🔥🔥🔥🔥🇮🇳🧡
Actually Mr. Modi is giving voice to the Millions of Indians That's why people love him & definitely he is coming in power again with full majority. Shri Ram is in heart of every Indian.
We built it with our own contribution not govt 😂
@rangoman1815
8 күн бұрын
No Ambani's lapdog Modi used tax payers money
Wall street journal don’t question 30+ islamic state that have islam as a state religion but question a hindu nation which is not even decalared a hindu nation
@nazeerpasha2075
10 күн бұрын
Because no one can define Hinduism. And no one knows what is meant by being a Hindu.
@akhripasta2670
9 күн бұрын
@nazeerpasha2075 Dharma
@Maithili_V
9 күн бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 we will define that don't worry and declare India a Hindu country.
@msdolly6101981
7 күн бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075; says a Muslim 😅😂
@lifePaultheball
7 күн бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075"One of the wives of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) joined him in I`tikaf and she noticed blood and yellowish discharge (from her private parts) and put a dish under her when she prayed." - Sahih al-Bukhari 310 Mohammad could only afford one Undergarment for all his wife they used to apply spit to clean and wear it that's why they suffered from various sexual diseases & had yellow discharge from their private parts. Wonder why marry so many when you can't afford to dress them. Can you answer me ?
report the video for misinformation
Don't interfere in India's internal matter if u don't have proper knowledge about it it's not developed by modi it's developed by Hindus
I miss those days where dislike count of youtube video is visible
@sushobhandas-eg1st
9 күн бұрын
Me tooo😅
@ramirosotto
8 күн бұрын
3,3k likes, 5,2k dislikes. You're welcome.
@pratyushsaxena9891
8 күн бұрын
@@ramirosotto thanks mate
@joydipbera8665
7 күн бұрын
you can download an extention
@farrightsocialistatheist845
7 күн бұрын
3.8 Likes, 6 Million Dislikes
It is not belief. It is fact that kings in 1500 demolished ram temple. Don't play it down please.
@osmanmohammed6304
11 күн бұрын
Valmiki Wrote Story Ram as Hero !!! What’s Historic fact!! Many Philosophies People Believe, Islam Started Education, Now Science Unfolding Facts !! Greatness of Allah/God Almighty !! World & Universe Mind Boggling Facts Science Unfolding!! Signs of God Everywhere!! On Earth Tiny Earth Planet God Tests Mankind To Discover Unseen Allah/God Almighty.. Creature like Humans Enjoying & Thrilling Experiences Discovering God.
@prakashkr2214
10 күн бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304its a fact that the temple existed before Babar demolished it.. I m atheist, Ram is fictional but it plays an important role in Indian civilization and tourism.. & India was never a secular country.. Its a Muslim country gives all the preference by religion, which is antithesis f secularism.
@deepx8679
10 күн бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304Roses are red and sky is blue she was 9 while he was 52
@AnjaliD-nb7cr
10 күн бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304sun revolves around earth , earth is flat .
@nazeerpasha2075
10 күн бұрын
@@AnjaliD-nb7cr In 2014, our Prime Minister said the fact Karan was born from Kunti’s ear is proof that genetic science was known at the time. He added the fact Ganesh has an elephant head is proof there were plastic surgeons in those days.
Naam dhang te liyo na jaye gyan sara humne devegi😂😂
The same west was silent when Spain was reclaiming all its churches. When India reclaims its temples which was clearly destroyed to build a mosque, it becomes "controversial".
Don’t lie modi is not throwing money. It is money that people donated
You don't have any mind to call ayodhya as hindu Vatican
@avinashg4974
12 күн бұрын
Oh sry, Hindu Vatican over Babar musjid over Hindu temple over dead fossils over something more over earth
@seahaws1
12 күн бұрын
Yes, and being a Christian myself I have huge respect for Hindus. Hindu have never invaded any country, not colonised and Indian just mind their own business. Please ignore our western media propaganda
@Blah888
12 күн бұрын
that's what you call a colonized mind
@unitycatalog
12 күн бұрын
Cope
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMA
12 күн бұрын
@@seahaws1Aisa mat socho ham hindu hai isliye bach jaengeAur laga ki tum jaise youth hi desh ka Bhavivysaya aur ye politics kitna brainwashed rakh rahi hai ham youth koAaj muslaman maar kha raha kal kisaan kha raha tha ek din jab sawal poochona choge to ham bhi kahenegeAur phir tumhe lagega bahut der ho gayiYe neta log politics ko isliye hi aisa rakhte hai taaki ham jaise youths inki taraf na dekheHam reels ke comment kattar hindu likhne mein busy rahenge aur ye log desh ka bantadhar karne mein lage rahengeAisa mat socho ham hindu hai isliye bach jaenge
Ayodhya temple made by Supreme Court judgement with Architectural proof then Indian people donated money to built the temple 🛕🙏🏼
Now I got why India's EAM Dr. S. Jaishankar always says that western media is biased against India. Atleast have a fact check, if you are talking about secularism then in India every religion's person gets a official holiday on his religious festival and not like USA where only Christians gets a holiday on their religious festival (ie) Christmas and these guys don't even consider giving holiday on religious festival of its minority religion's people and they are talking about secularism of a nation where for thousands years multiple religions live together happily.
LOL 🤣😂 someone sitting in USA is educating world about Ayodhya. Using some India expert nobody knows about.
@artman12
11 күн бұрын
These yt imperialists still continuing the British propaganda tradition
@amateur_football9751
10 күн бұрын
Typical reaction of Modi fanboys who are so insecure, they can't stand any criticism to their god like leader!! Modi is a Hindu supremacist!!
@saurabhade1079
10 күн бұрын
He is known communist known all over Indian circle.
@nazeerpasha2075
8 күн бұрын
Mythology getting debunked.
@flyingflowers1889
7 күн бұрын
Unboxing when ?@@nazeerpasha2075
vatican - Ayodhya for christians mecca - Mathura for muslims china - Kashi for atheists
@SuhbanIo
9 күн бұрын
brainrot
@soragaming3653
9 күн бұрын
😂😂😂
@GoldenWhistler-zf4mp
9 күн бұрын
@@SuhbanIoyeah, it goes in your family 😂
@PZier
9 күн бұрын
Don't compare Vatican to something 😡
@PZier
9 күн бұрын
@@prathameshsur6806 Bro when did Jesus said hallelujah 😅.
America people don't have origin Taking about others people history 😂😂😂 I need this kind of confidence in my life
Video proudly funded by congress 😂😂😂 . This video should be banned till she knows how to pronounce Ayodhya and Ramayana properly 😂😂😂
uneducated journalism at its best.
@nileshparab8135
12 күн бұрын
I agree. I have reported the video under misleading/ misinformation.
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMA
12 күн бұрын
@@nileshparab8135Aisa mat socho ham hindu hai isliye bach jaengeAur laga ki tum jaise youth hi desh ka Bhavivysaya aur ye politics kitna brainwashed rakh rahi hai ham youth koAaj muslaman maar kha raha kal kisaan kha raha tha ek din jab sawal poochona choge to ham bhi kahenegeAur phir tumhe lagega bahut der ho gayiYe neta log politics ko isliye hi aisa rakhte hai taaki ham jaise youths inki taraf na dekheHam reels ke comment kattar hindu likhne mein busy rahenge aur ye log desh ka bantadhar karne mein lage rahengeAisa mat socho ham hindu hai isliye bach jaenge
@neodenz
12 күн бұрын
Uneducated? They are speaking straight facts. Get your minds out of the propoganda lake
@rudraagarwal6402
11 күн бұрын
Bro from where it isnt showing the option to report anywhere@@nileshparab8135
@y57575
11 күн бұрын
WSJ the gang of propoganda 😂
Wait for Kashi and Mathura 😂😂😂.
@anushasaxena8073
7 күн бұрын
vote karo sab. bjo ko aana bahot zaroori hai
One side story and purely baised and hate against Hindu
Cry Western media! Cry more 😂😂
Western Media crying. Ram Mandir is helping Indian economy. Average daily visitors is 100000 to 150000.
@adolft_official
10 күн бұрын
Praud of Ram Temple built using Chinese Cranes
@shreyash2006
10 күн бұрын
@@adolft_officialproud of mecca build by Chinese cranes and the walls of masjid al haram 😂
@mohammedfurniturewala2950
10 күн бұрын
You said same when the question was asked about the reason for building a ₹3000 cr. Statue of Sardar Vallabh bhai Patel.😂
@adolft_official
10 күн бұрын
@@shreyash2006 Yes poojeet, Inddian Gulf labours are working for Chinese construction companies
@Eleku
10 күн бұрын
Religion is not helping the economy. Religion is stupid.
Beta Ayodhya is centuries older than Vatican..
@pritech8302
10 күн бұрын
well said
@adolft_official
10 күн бұрын
Praud of Ram Temple built using Chinese Cranes
@Eleku
10 күн бұрын
The City of Rome was founded thousands of years ago.
@nazeerpasha2075
10 күн бұрын
Historical proof or just a myth?
@googleGuy44
10 күн бұрын
So, what? The use of "Vatican" was only meant to make non-indian audience relate to the significance of Ayodhya.
It not Government of India who is spending on temple it is by donation by Hindus. Railway n Airport contractions - Yes.
When Supreme court of India gave clear Judgment, who are you to call it, Controversial ?
What video is about : Modi Poltics Babri masjid Temple construction And politics What they didn't tell you Archeological survey Historical facts Hindus struggle for the temple Supreme court judgement on The basis of archeological excavations . EXCEPTIONAL JOURNALISM 👏👏
@rohitprajapati9720
11 күн бұрын
just want to spread their propoganda... we should report them ...
@vishakhasharma2209
11 күн бұрын
Short and sweet 👍
@alphacapital2425
6 күн бұрын
*This comment must be most liked!*
Before Ram mandir, Modi govt built 262 medical colleges, 15 AIIMS, 6 IIT, 16 IIIT, 7 IIM, 4 crores houses for poor, free treatment for 6 crores poor, 11 crores tap connections, metro in 11 cities, 60000 km highways, 37000 km railway lines, 75 Airports & 10000 Jan Aushadhi Kendra
@isleephungry
12 күн бұрын
and gives 5 kilos of free monthly rations for the poor😂
@manishgurav2369
12 күн бұрын
@@isleephungry of course it's necessary to support population whom coming out of poverty.
@manishgurav2369
12 күн бұрын
@@isleephungry 80 crore people get free ration, hindi, muslim, all religion without discrimination.
@Lakshyam9
12 күн бұрын
But NOT VISIBLE to WSJ and its STOOGES
@moonknight3594
12 күн бұрын
@@isleephungryfun fact no West will tell u that ! Muslim people's got bigger double the size of LANd in Same region to build there own new mosque ! Hindu's collected successfully over 200 million $ ! Also money from Hindu group donated son share to Muslim mosque ! WORk mosque going on ! From saudi Some imams got invited and first brick of that mosque is imported from mecca but hey this all do not suit western narrative😂 so u will not see all this in news 😂
It's us hindu who donate for the temple Not the government please do some research
We Indian Hindu are proud to be a Hindu any problem to Abrahamic religion😮
Mosque was not built on ruins of temple. But on a intact temple.
@Mr.-AJ
7 күн бұрын
Supreme Court Don’t believe so.
@Jerry-th4go
7 күн бұрын
@@Mr.-AJ we all know the truth.
@Mr.-AJ
7 күн бұрын
@@Jerry-th4go No you don't know, you "just believe", doubt whether you actually believe; It is only because of Muslim hatred that you are happy with this act. You know I know!
@Jerry-th4go
7 күн бұрын
@@Mr.-AJ there is no muslim hatred. Is gyanwapi built on temple ruins and one might wonder why would u build a mosque on temple pillars right?
@Mr.-AJ
7 күн бұрын
@@Jerry-th4go We were talking about Babri Masjid; Gnanabapi can be discussed another day. State where the Supreme Court judgment refers to "credible evidence" instead of "belief". Nowhere; Then it is nothing but foolishness to continue discussing with you.
I'm cancelling my WSJ subscription. They're not what they used to be. Poor woke journalism, what a shame.
@kenster8270
12 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for letting us all know about your subscription changes. Please do keep us updated of any future changes to your viewing settings, as such information is downright CRUCIAL to us.
@Lakshyam9
12 күн бұрын
@@kenster8270 Are you from WSJ? Then why triggered ???? 😅😂
@moonknight3594
12 күн бұрын
@@kenster8270fun fact no West will tell u that ! Muslim people's got bigger double the size of LANd in Same region to build there own new mosque ! Hindu's collected successfully over 200 million $ ! Also money from Hindu group donated son share to Muslim mosque ! WORk mosque going on ! From saudi Some imams got invited and first brick of that mosque is imported from mecca but hey this all do not suit western narrative😂 so u will not see all this in news 😂
@yeetian2774
12 күн бұрын
It’s not woke….its the rich Arab oil princes
@deborajdutta938
12 күн бұрын
@@kenster8270 Womp womp
Shri ayodhya dham is not built by the money of government it is built by the interest that the bank gave from the donation of people of ayodhya
Why this foreign people can't pronounce ayodhya properly 😂
"So in the end 2000 people mostly Muslims were killed " ... 😂😂😂😂 Hypocrisy ki bhi ek seema hoti hain
@SangitaKumari-wb5iz
7 күн бұрын
😂😂😂
Turkey did it same thing why isn't that a big issue 😂
@agilephilosopher
12 күн бұрын
Probably because the biased WSJ reporters producing this video has a Turkish spouse 🙂
@fredyflinstone9522
11 күн бұрын
@@agilephilosopheralso super woke
@ShivaYadav-uu7rl
10 күн бұрын
They didn't did the same thing . We fight 500 years for it we fought in COURT . .. they never did it ..
western media crying when India is finally moving towards progress with it's Culture preservation...
Imagine asian media running story “Why did Osama hit the twin towers, was it justified?”.
Of course Hindus building a temple where their lord was born, on land that the supreme court gave them is indeed very controversial.
@anujsethi7845
12 күн бұрын
How can God be born?
@f5rwall
12 күн бұрын
@@anujsethi7845 If Gods son can be born to a virgin or a prophet born out of a camel trader, why can't God be born?
@yasink331
12 күн бұрын
@@f5rwallI don't see the issue with the second? If a prophet is a human then a prophet can be born to anyone. God isn't human so God can't be born to a human
@ojasaklecha
12 күн бұрын
@@yasink331God just made their incarnation, or in easier terms took human form due to various reasons and multiple times.
@samriddhabasu8764
12 күн бұрын
@@yasink331 well in our scriptures it is mentioned that bhagwan or god as you say, can take birth, only after they manifest themselves in the form of human, and if the logic suggest that gods can create human, why it is not possible for god , to be born as a human, why god cannot transform itself, from nirguna to saguna, why human today constrain themselves to a closed and monotheistic thinking I can't understand
Dumb news channel...why are u calling it hindu vatican ,when it is called ram temple in ayodhya
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMA
12 күн бұрын
Aisa mat socho ham hindu hai isliye bach jaengeAur laga ki tum jaise youth hi desh ka Bhavivysaya aur ye politics kitna brainwashed rakh rahi hai ham youth koAaj muslaman maar kha raha kal kisaan kha raha tha ek din jab sawal poochona choge to ham bhi kahenegeAur phir tumhe lagega bahut der ho gayiYe neta log politics ko isliye hi aisa rakhte hai taaki ham jaise youths inki taraf na dekheHam reels ke comment kattar hindu likhne mein busy rahenge aur ye log desh ka bantadhar karne mein lage rahengeAisa mat socho ham hindu hai isliye bach jaenge
@neodenz
12 күн бұрын
It is just a comparison. If you get offended by that, then don't watch this
@Jojo_KokoUK
11 күн бұрын
Modi will Lead India to H3LL😂😂😂😂😂😂
@gautaminandi5572
11 күн бұрын
@@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMASo you believe what Babur did to Ram mandir(which was the holiest place for hindus) years ago and killed them is justified but when we take our holy lands back we get called intolerant.
@Vitamin_NOOT
11 күн бұрын
It is for white people to understand better. That this temple is not just any temple but holds very high importance.
Love this propaganda. The United States has _really_ worked its effort to instill Modi in power only for one reason, and it isn't for the Indian people. Take a guess what it is. I'll give you a hint: it has everything to do with 'QUAD'.
Alert : this is fake and misleading! ❤
Modi didn't put any money. It was the donation from us Hindus
Don't compare it to Vatican, there are many Vaticans in India which are much older than Vatican. We have built this through our 500 years of hard work; the government has not spent any money on it.
We are a hindu majority secular nation as US is Christian majority secular nation. Both Democratic. Kindly report correctly 😂
Western media has no idea
@RojaJaneman
8 күн бұрын
They know. The lying is intentionally malicious. It’s designed to damage Bharath.
What about pro Palestine protest in US universities? You have enough time to understand the reality of peace community 😂
This is the kind of foreign interference that S. Jaishankar was talking about. What can you expect out of Wall SluhT Journal?
Why do all western media conveniently not mention that Supreme Court gave the 2.7 acre disputed land to Hindus to build their temple and the same ruling also gave a prominent 5 acre land to Muslims to build their mosque. Temple main building is done but will take another 2 years to complete. Meanwhile even the mosque in Ayodya called the Mohammad bin Abdullah mosque will complete as well. It will be the biggest mosque in India n will hold the largest Quran in the world. Imam of Mecca will be coming to do the first prayers. If this is not secularism then what is?? Can you imagine a temple or a mosque being built in Vatican holy city or a church or temple being built in the holy city of Mecca?? Only Hindus will accept this because they are just happy that the Supreme Court gave them the 2.7acre holy site back based on archeological evidence and ancient traveller documents.