We are also told to “pray without ceasing”; to pray all day, everyday. I feel more called everyday to wear a hair covering all day, everyday; because I DO pray all day every day for family, friends, and unknowns folks in need of prayers. Spiritual warfare is real.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

11 ай бұрын

...because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her... In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God? doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him? and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;... -Young's Literal Translation (YLT) A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. If a woman needs to pick up and place on her head a physical object, so that she can communicate in an acceptable fashion with deity, then that piece of clothing would become a talisman to her. Talisman (basic definition)- a piece of clothing (or other physical object) that is believed to have spiritual or magical properties. The object will align with your intention for its use. Every time you look at a talisman, your mind will recall the original intention of its use, until wearing it becomes a necessary ritual.

@marriage4life893

10 ай бұрын

That's wonderful!

@josephpchajek2685

6 ай бұрын

@@user-iz8np3vv4i "The attestation to the head covering being an actual veil is very early. Irenaeus (AD 130-220) was an early Christian bishop and apologist. He was a disciple of Polycarp, who was a disciple of the apostle John. Irenaeus quotes 1 Corinthians 11:10 as “A woman ought to have a veil upon her head, because of the angels.” Gardiner, Jeremy. Head Covering: A Forgotten Christian Practice for Modern Times (p. 65). Head Covering Movement. Kindle Edition. Other notable church fathers who said that a fabric head covering was what Paul commanded include: Clement of Alexandria (AD 150-215),Hippolytus (AD 170-236), Tertullian (approx. AD 155-220), John Chrysostom (AD 347-407), Jerome (AD 347-420) and Augustine (AD 354-430). Gardiner, Jeremy. Head Covering: A Forgotten Christian Practice for Modern Times (p. 66). Head Covering Movement. Kindle Edition. That book also covers the Greek words used for head coverings in Corinthians. I'll not get into it here, but I recommend reading it. IMO it's referring to an actual veil, not simply the hair as a covering.

@simba8665

6 ай бұрын

@@user-iz8np3vv4i 😂😂😂 let people who want to cover, cover. If some people say I had an encounter with God telling me to cover, get read of make + jewelry or dress a certain way, who are u to say otherwise. I don’t see anyone trying to convince people to do whatever they are doing

@1Sackettgirl

5 ай бұрын

Don't you believe that praying without ceasing(means to hold something up in prayer in your heart without giving up, even if you are not continuously in ACTIVE prayer regarding that something) so if we pray without ceasing about many things should we not wear a covering during most waking or non "bedroom/bathroom" hours ? We honestly can't ACTIVELY pray 24/7, many things prevent that.

There was a younger girl at my church who would always cover her head and was also in the choir. She was the only person in a church of like 200 that did it and I thought it was great. She wasn’t married though.

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

❤❤

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

So many woman (and girls) want to do what's right in this matter. I've been over this a lot and post a lot. The hair itself is the 'covering'. This is the only way it can all make sense. Reply for more if desired.

@romitsu968

Жыл бұрын

@@user-iz8np3vv4ihe hair isn't the covering, for then it would be commanded for men to shave their heads. As the scriptures say, “Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonors his head.” [1 Corinthians 11:4] this covering is not referring to his hair, if it was, then men would be commanded to have their heads shaven; and thus, we can conclude that the covering that women are instructed to wear is a separate covering, not their hair.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

@@romitsu968 Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. -NASB version If the above scripture means a turban, for example, why would God require the priests to wear turbans? Paul certainly would have known about this and maybe seen it. You shall speak to all the skillful people whom I have endowed with the spirit of wisdom, that they make Aaron’s garments to consecrate him, that he may serve as priest to Me. And these are the garments which they shall make: a breastpiece, an ephod, a robe, a tunic of checkered work, a turban, and a sash. They shall make holy garments for your brother Aaron and his sons, so that he may serve as priest to Me. -excerpt Exodus 28 Jesus prayed with something on His head while on the cross. A crown of thorns. And they dressed Him in purple, and after twisting together a crown of thorns, they put it on Him; and they began saluting Him: “Hail, King of the Jews!” -excerpt Mark 15 And Jesus, crying out with a loud voice, said, “Father, into Your hands I entrust My spirit.” And having said this, He died. -excerpt Luke 23 ******************************************* At least twice a woman's hair was not only visible to Jesus Himself, but it touched Him. Neither woman was rebuked. Since Jesus didn't care about fabric head coverings why should we? “Do you see this woman? I entered your house; you gave me no water for my feet, but she has wet my feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. You gave me no kiss, but from the time I came in she has not ceased to kiss my feet. You did not anoint my head with oil, but she has anointed my feet with ointment. Therefore I tell you, her sins, which are many, are forgiven-for she loved much. -excerpt Luke 7 Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. But Judas Iscariot, one of His disciples, the one who intended to betray Him, said, “Why was this perfume not sold for three hundred denarii and the proceeds given to poor people?” Now he said this, not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief, and as he kept the money box, he used to steal from what was put into it. Therefore Jesus said, “Leave her alone... -excerpt John 12 ************* It can only mean the hair is the covering, as the NASB states here: Does even nature itself not teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him, but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her as a covering. ************ No Old Covenant law requiring women to wear a fabric covering. Therefore no Old Testament reference available. 1 Corinthians 11 starts with this: ...hold firmly to the traditions, just as I handed them down to you... Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ. Now I praise you because you remember me in everything and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I handed them down to you. But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ. Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. But every woman who has her head uncovered... So, there was no Old Covenant law requiring women to wear a fabric covering. There was no time to establish a tradition of a fabric covering. There was no way to "hold firmly to the traditions" because you can't start a 'tradition' in a period of time that is just a few years. ************ If the covering was a physical covering, then hair length is irrelevant. No one would know if the woman had long hair or no hair. ************ Also, if a woman needs to touch and pick up something physical, before she can communicate with God, that would make the fabric covering an idol. But one could also say it was a talisman I suppose, since a talisman could be an article of clothing. Talisman (basic definition)- a piece of clothing (or other physical object) that is believed to have spiritual or magical properties. The object will align with your intention for its use. Every time you look at a talisman, your mind will recall the original intention of its use, until wearing it becomes a necessary ritual. ************ There is also an essay by 'FA'. It's about a 5 minute read. The full essay is available if requested. Once again one must keep in mind when reading the essay, that women were not using a fabric covering as a requirement of the Law. So it was not part of the culture then. That is confirmed by the events of Jesus with the 2 women above and also the scriptures that discourage women from braiding their hair. If women were commonly wearing a head covering in public no one would have known about this braiding. Their head and hair would have been covered by the fabric. ...likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire,... -excerpt 1 Timothy 2 ESV Do not let your adorning be external-the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear- but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart... -excerpt 1 Peter 3 ESV Excerpt here of post by FA: If these verses do not move you yet then here’s one that should definitely blow your mind. Paul asks you to make a judgment call in verse 13 as if one should naturally see a problem because he asks you to: "Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? " If “covering” really meant a veil then one would have to explain why anyone would possibly come up with a judgment that a woman praying or prophesying WITHOUT A FABRIC VEIL ON THEIR HEAD WOULD LOGICALLY OR NATURALLY LOOK WRONG? Someone needs to explain this logically. Be honest, does looking at someone doing this naturally create a thought that a veil is missing?

@addy_animates484

Жыл бұрын

Stop that’s me though 😂 I wear a head covering, a young teen, and I’m in the choir and I’m the only one who wears one. I think it’s cool to see other young women doing that too!

I’m 15 and have had it on my heart to veil for almost an entire year. Last night I finally brought it up to my father who was totally for the idea! I ordered my first set of veils last night :) I’m using the channel as a way to 1. Feel supported and understand 2. Learn more So thank you so much for posting this!

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. But Judas Iscariot, one of His disciples, the one who intended to betray Him, said, “Why was this perfume not sold for three hundred denarii and the proceeds given to poor people?” Now he said this, not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief, and as he kept the money box, he used to steal from what was put into it. Therefore Jesus said, “Leave her alone... -excerpt John 12

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

I’m so happy to hear this 🫶🥰 keep doing what God puts on your heart and you’ll do well in life!

@dumbodirectioner28

Жыл бұрын

@@lis_daily_ thank you!!!

@nicolagrant5450

Жыл бұрын

If God wants us to cover, and we know He does and we do not, it could be salvidic

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

@@nicolagrant5450 (I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) ...because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her... In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God? doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him? and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;... -Young's Literal Translation (YLT) A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes, scriptures outside of Corinthians mostly Essay by another: post length 7 minutes, scriptures only within Corinthians Reply for post(s) if desired. They includes scriptures and commentary.

I was convicted 2 years ago to cover and I went all in. Only one other lady covers in my congregation. I was covering almost all day and I wasn’t being spiritually attacked anymore. I even wore it to sleep and wouldn’t get attacked in my sleep. I realized lately I have only been covering during church service, and bible studying and i have been dealing with spiritual warfare. Thank you for letting God speak through you, telling me to cover more often again. 💜

@barryallen119

11 ай бұрын

Verses 5 through 7, as well as verse 13, of 1 Corinthians 11 use a form of the Greek word for "veiled", κατακαλύπτω katakalupto; this is contrasted with the Greek word περιβόλαιον peribolaion, which is mentioned in verse 15 of the same chapter, in reference to "something cast around" as with the "hair of a woman … like a mantle cast around". These separate Greek words indicate that there are thus two headcoverings that Paul states are compulsory for Christian women to wear, a cloth veil and her natural hair.

@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj

11 ай бұрын

Those who promote a cloth veil as a covering try to use the fact that this word perbolaiou is different than the word katakalupto to prove that it is talking about a “second covering” - the long hair being the first, katakalupto, and the veil being the second, perbolaiou. But, katakalupto is not a noun, and does not mean what these veil-promoters say it does. It shows a state of being, and is used as an adverb, say the scholars. Therefore, there are not two nouns - that is, two distinct coverings - being discussed. Rather, a state of being, or condition, is discussed: the man’s head is in a state or condition of being “not hanging-down, covered”, while the woman’s head is in a state of being “hanging-down, covered”. Her hair is given her for a “throw-around”. In other words, the hanging-down hair serves as a throw-around for her head - she is covered, and meets the condition first put forth: that she pray or prophesy with her long hair hanging down on her head. Since it is a shame for a man to have long hair, he is to pray to God with his head “not hanging-down, covered” -- ouk katakaluptesthai. The entire context of this discussion about authority and headship, and the hierarchy established by God, includes a discussion of long hair on women and short hair on men. There is never a mention of a piece of cloth. Consider: the veil is a man-made device to cover a God-given, natural state. It is an imitation of what God has already provided. The cloth veil was a common article worn by both men and women of the desert lands. It served a practical purpose in that it protected the head, hair, and face from the relentless hot sun and the blowing sands of the desert. It was not commanded by God, but was a practical invention. As the centuries wore on, it became a custom among certain cultures and religions. God does not bind man-made customs upon His people as immutable law! - Bernie Parsons

@bryanlovesjesus2204

9 ай бұрын

@@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jjLol it’s pretty sad you posted this comment mind when she’s clearly given he experiences with a head covering how it’s actually benefited her.

@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj

9 ай бұрын

@@bryanlovesjesus2204 So you think it sad to preach the truth? So what is the recommendation then say nothing or lie? I feel for her and perhaps more than you think, which is why I am sharing biblical truth. Perhaps you don't see anything amiss when someone tells you that an inanimate object has some kind of power to repel demons. This is not something one can find in the Bible, right? Even non-believers claim that the Eastern practice of Yoga and Mediation works and I don't deny that it does to a certain extent if one thinks that it will it will but only for a moment. But as a Christian we know we shouldn't do such things as it deviates from true Christian thinking. Catholics do this all the time as they will swear by using or possessing a scapula, a cross, a rosary, a prayer card,etc they are protected. So in your view they are all right to do so regardless that they are not doctrinal? Our faith should be on the Lord and his Word not on objects. That is important otherwise this can escalate to more deviations of the Bible.

@bryanlovesjesus2204

9 ай бұрын

@@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj maybe research into the history of head coverings in the early church and you’ll see you’re not exactly giving anything historical. Christian woman back then worse head coverings. See Old Testament passages which also allude to Jewish Women covering their heads with a cloth. There’s no debate on head coverings in early Christianity this was how many Christian woman dressed.

Thank you all for encouraging comments. Although I wear head covering, I always feel I have to be brave to do this nowadays at church. But my husband is very supportive and you guys are wonderful sharing your experiences. Let Jesus be glorified!

@lis_daily_

8 ай бұрын

amen ❤️

@BingoNamo-gb8pz

Ай бұрын

@@lis_daily_what if the woman is single? If you were single would you still be doing this? Thanks.

@undefinedlimits9993

19 күн бұрын

You are doing this for God not for man. Once you are not of this world stay true.

I grew up Church of Christ & I'm still in it, & my husband & I recently became convicted about the same thing! It has also been a source of pride for me to have my hair out or done up, which is another reason I feel so convicted to cover it up. I've had to pray for a modest spirit & to not care so much that I am the only one head covering. I'm so glad there are others out there.

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

Love this for you! So encouraging to hear another sister speak on her convictions 🔥❤️

@leilawilliams8175

Жыл бұрын

You're not the only one. When I was little my mother bravely started being the only woman in our Methodist church wearing a hat because she wanted to follow the scripture. It was hard on her but I am thankful that she normalized it for me and I am blessed to have a lot of friends who cover!

@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj

8 ай бұрын

@@leilawilliams8175 🧐

Ever since God revealed to me about head covering, I stopped getting demonic attacks in my dreams. I thought that was super interesting and feel it has something to do with verse 10 where it talks about on account of the angels, women should head cover. And In verse 5 it talks about how women who pray or proclaim God's message in public worship with nothing on her head disgraces her husband.. so you wearing the head covering during this video is perfect ☺️

@mariahwisel1381

Жыл бұрын

If you don’t mind my asking, what did God reveal to you about head covering? Do you cover full time?

@yellowlemon5936

Жыл бұрын

@@mariahwisel1381 So just coming across videos of why Christian women head cover and really studying 1 corinthians 11, praying a lot about it so I fully understood it, is what lead me to feeling convicted. I don't cover full time only during prayer and at church because verse 5 talks about the headcovering being there during praying and prophesying.

@cupcakinGAYLE

Жыл бұрын

Yes. This was my same experience.

@MyCrossHisGrace

2 ай бұрын

Nice video... May I suggest folks consider "veils" also - they're elegant, fashionable and a demonstration of reverence and respect. 🙏 +JMC

@_Prayer_Warrior.

Ай бұрын

​@@yellowlemon5936 I think your comment was used by God to help me with the same problem, thank you 😊

Thank you for your video. I personally agree with you. I am much older than you (57 years old), and ever since I first read this passage in the Bible, aged 16, I have wondered about this, and since my early 30’s have felt a measure of conviction about it. When I was at university I studied sociology, specialising in feminism, and we covered dress, and part of that was the demise of head covering in churches since the second wave of feminism, so that by the late 1970s wearing hats to church was no longer common, or even encouraged. I think why pastors don’t explore this now is that they fear a backlash about it. Because this topic then connects to the broader debate about male headship, and therefore female ordination, women preaching in churches, women teaching men, etc.. In my observations, not many church leaders have the courage to tackle this curly issues. But what I love is that God is birthing this conviction within women themselves, so it looks like this Biblical issue is being slowly addressed by women themselves, choosing Biblical submission - which is amazing in this day and age! ❤

@richardgrant3596

Жыл бұрын

kzread.infofdYyHmmX8G4?feature=share

@user-zx1sm8bg3c

Жыл бұрын

Amen, sister! 🌷

@adama9032

Жыл бұрын

Islam has much more in common with Christianity an they don't want us to know this

@1Sackettgirl

5 ай бұрын

What about feminism and the abandonment of dresses?? Do you feel that women's pants are wrong?

@wendya5887

2 ай бұрын

I’m 60 and recently changed to a chapel church that’s more conservative. I’ve been studying head covering, and leaning to cover as well. The hair is her glory, but a veil covers her. Found it interesting about the angels that cover at times too. When we worship, angels are present and they see when we submit to authority and order. I read women covered for 1800+ years. It came before feminist movement. Which it’s probably always been around to some degree. Prostitutes were bald headed in biblical days or uncovered….not willing to submit to authority. So other women covered to also not be confused like them. Some was cultural, but the main thing is biblical.

When i became catholic a few years ago i tried to veil but i was one of the only women who did and after i got a few comments i felt as though i was drawing attention to myself which was the last thing i wanted to do at Mass. So i stopped, but i was really sad about it and every sunday i ask myself, should i do it again? I really appreciated you mentioning the headcovering as an move against feminism, i feel like maybe standing out isnt a bad thing when what we are trying to do is claim our God given womanhood, especially in this day and age where there is such a huge movemnt to erase gender all together. Im going to pray about this more but i feel very encouraged by this video, thank you so much!

@lis_daily_

7 ай бұрын

Thank you for sharing, pray and listen to the Holy Spirit he will guide you 🫶

@Monkee7779

5 ай бұрын

Being set-apart is rarely easy :)

@mph1ish

4 ай бұрын

Yes you should do it again! I am Catholic also and I do not wear a veil for anyone but The Lord. Never mind what others say. Just simply explain it's for reverence/humility if you feel the need to say anything. I hate calling attention to myself but that is my pride so I just tell myself to get over it. The graces will far outweigh any ignorant comments, and you may inspire other women to do the same. God bless you!

Good for you! What bravery to be the only one at your church doing it! I wear mine all day because any moment can become a prayer meeting with my kids needing discipling but I've been wearing it a long time so I'm used to and it doesn't feel difficult.

@lluda44

10 ай бұрын

I am convinced why Paul would resort to an image portraying a praying or prophesying woman with her hair uncovered, and why he asks if it's proper to do so...he uses that example as means of showing us how that sort of behavior would be exihibiting shameless boldness...Paul is soft, he just asks is it proper to pray to God with an uncovered head. I would ask; 'is it not insolent to stand before God in prayer while disobeying his commandments?' Saying, 'God, please hear my plea' while ignoring what God desires from me, is pretty insolent, and definitely improper.

I veil when I pray and worship. I love my veil 🫶 it makes me feel closer to God.

What helped me understand we need a cloth covering was thinking that if hair was a covering then that meant men needed to be bald to not be covered. 😂

So much research & praying lately but I start covering today! Thankful for you sharing, my thoughts are “I want every moment of my life (mother of 3 young children) to be worship!” So I’ve decided to cover at all times. I’m so excited to humble myself further & honor my husband! He’s totally on board! I used to spend hundreds on my hair & had a shaved pixie cut for years! Totally relate to the fear of researching out of almost knowing what the answer is & not wanting to commit. The last few years I’ve stopped coloring my hair & now have finally jumped all in to give up everything for Christ. Thank you for sharing your journey! Shalom, sister!

@user-iz8np3vv4i

5 ай бұрын

...because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her... In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God? doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him? and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;... -Young's Literal Translation (YLT)

@FA-God-s-Words-Matter

5 ай бұрын

If we follow those who subscribe to the doctrine of women wearing veils, then it can be argued that the most often cited verse is 1st Corinth. 11:5, which states: “But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.” According to many of those who believe women ought to wear veils this verse supposedly implies that a woman’s uncovered head is a woman who does not wear a veil. Such a woman is either dishonoring God, their own physical head or her husband for failing to wear it which implies that they are in disobedience. Some have gone so far as to say it is a sin. Another assumption is that the woman being referred to already has long hair and since they conclude that the covering is a veil then it must be referring to an “additional” covering otherwise it would clash with verse 15 stating that God gave women long hair for a covering. Another conclusion is that women ought to be covered ONLY when praying and prophesying which would make it seem as though it were something that can be placed on or taken off like a veil. You’ve probably noticed by now it takes several assumptions to reach the conclusion that women ought to wear a foreign object on their heads, despite the lack of evidence. * Does the Bible really give a clear command that women should wear a veil? The first thing that everyone must understand when talking about this topic is that it DOES NOT say the word “veil “or any other physical headwear, as far as the KJV is concerned. It surely mentions that the woman’s head should be covered, and no one disputes this, but it does not say that it should be covered with a veil, a shawl, a bonnet, a cap, or any other specific headwear. The verses in question within 1st Corinthians 11 mention the words, cover, covered, uncovered, and covering, but that does not mean we can translate this to mean specifically a veil, a shawl, a bonnet, a cap, or anything else similar. In fact, it would seem more like an adverb rather than a noun. Nevertheless, the word “cover” is often unfortunately interpreted by head covering promoters to mean a veil above all other types of headwear, even if there is no evidence to prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt. To do so would mean that one is trying to read more into the verse than what is actually stated and is not truly seeking an exegesis of the Scriptures. Some have claimed that they are referring to a physical synthetic head covering because the Scriptures seem to indicate that there are two exclusive conditions in order to wear one and that is when a woman is either praying and/or prophesying. But does this interpretation stand up to logic? If we were to believe that under certain conditions a woman ought to wear a physical head covering, then it stands to reason that under OTHER conditions a woman should be able NOT to wear one. For example, if you are going to argue that a woman ought to wear a veil because the Bible claims there are two conditions, then it is logical to presume that any other condition would ALLOW them to be without one, like speaking in tongues, interpreting tongues, healing the sick, casting out devils, etc. Now if a head covering promoter should claim that there are MORE conditions, then they admit that there aren’t really “two” conditions thereby nullifying the two-condition argument. The reasoning behind why the “two-condition” argument is important for veil promoters is because if these words were actual conditions, then it would seem as though the covering were something that can be placed on or taken off. So even though it does not literally or EXPLICITLY say anything about putting on or taking off a veil. Veil promotors form this belief based on what they believe to be IMPLIED and not by a direct statement. Many people like to believe this because they ASSUME that praying and prophesying are two conditions instead of seeing them as mere examples. * Praying and prophesying were meant to be viewed as examples, not conditions… Now I can understand how someone can mistakenly conclude praying and prophesying as conditions in verse 5, on the surface, but once you read the rest of the verses in context one cannot reach that conclusion. For example, if the strongest argument is because there were conditions for women to wear veils because of verse 5 then why don’t we hear the same thing spoken of about men in verse 4? “Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.” Normally we do not hear the argument that men ought not to have their heads covered exclusively under two conditions as we hear for women as to why they should. I think it is because that would imply that they CAN have their heads covered under other circumstances like the examples I mentioned before as in speaking in tongues, interpreting tongues, healing the sick, casting out devils, etc. But I suspect a veil promoter would not go along with this. Then there is verse 7: “For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.” So, there seems to be ANOTHER reason for men not to cover. Therefore, if the reason for men not to cover their heads in this verse is because he is the “image and glory of God,” then why even mention praying or prophesying in verse 4? Should a man not be covered under ANY condition since verse 7 overrides any supposed conditions? Shouldn’t that make you question that perhaps Paul was just giving a couple of examples? Verses 4 and 5 are basically the same except for whom they are directed yet when one hears the arguments by veil promoters it is typically about how verse 5 is conditional for women yet for men in verse 4 it is usually not spoken of. Again, isn’t it more likely that Paul was using the words praying and prophesying as examples in both verses? We can also get a sense that Paul was referring to praying and prophesying as examples if we read verse 13 when it only mentions the word praying and NOT prophesying. “Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?” If there were only two exclusive conditions, then why would he leave out prophesying? We can’t say he got tired in his writing as he mentioned both words in verses 4 and 5. So, what can we say about this? Just that Paul was giving us a couple of examples of how doing something HOLY or GODLY does not give a pleasant appearance if the woman is uncovered, meaning not covered in long hair and the same goes for men when their heads are covered in long hair since that is exactly one is supposed to understand when reading verse 14. * So Is the Covering Long Hair or a Veil? ….. If we examine all the verses from verses 4 to 15 without bias, we should at least agree that at certain points the verses are referring to physical heads and hair. In that case, what we should be asking when mentioning the words “covered,” “cover,” “uncovered” and “covering” is: Are they referring to long or short hair or some kind of foreign object that goes on the head? Some will even say all the above, but if we carefully examine verse 15 we would be getting a clearer picture of what was being referred to in the earlier verses when it mentions these words. “But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her FOR a covering." KJV So if the covering is long hair, then the words “covered” or “cover” (which are synonymous with “covering”) should be understood as long hair as well. If that’s true, then to be “uncovered” would mean “short hair.” If so, then we can get a better picture of verse 4 when it says that it is shameful or dishonorable for a man to pray or prophesy with his head “covered.” Note the similarity of verse 4 to verse 14 that’s because they are both referring to being covered in LONG hair.

I respect your transparency so much! I have also wondered this as well.

Bless you sister. I'm so encouraged to hear you speak like this. Much love to you and your husband.

This has been on my heart for a while now, and I can't thank you for being so transparent and super sweet about this.

@lis_daily_

4 ай бұрын

🫶🫶

I’ve been researching head coverings and all I see is orthodox catholic women and it’s so disheartening because i fundamentally disagree with Catholicism so I felt like there was no reputable woman who has advice on the subject. I spent 7 hrs watching Mike Wingers video on head coverings and it was also very insightful. Thanks so much for making this! I’m going to be praying about it a lot because I’ve thought a lot about how I “idolize” my hair and take pride in it and how maybe I should cover my hair because of that idol I’ve made… I’m just not sure so I’m praying about it and I think I’ll be fasting as well

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

Ruthanne (I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12 A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes Reply for post if desired. It includes scriptures and commentary.

@LoveMyHorseShazam

Жыл бұрын

Do you believe that the Catholic perspective on God existing in three persons-Father, Son, and Holy Spirit-isn’t a reputable perspective just because it’s something that *Catholics* believe? Let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water…whether you agree with other Catholic traditions and beliefs or not, a Catholic female perspective on head covering is not “un-reputable” simply because you don’t agree with other Catholic customs…Protestants and Catholics can still support one another’s beliefs because we believe in many of the same things, and your spirit may feel nourished upon exploring the Catholic perspective on head covering.

@ruthannemarie2668

Жыл бұрын

@@LoveMyHorseShazam I agree you can’t discount someone’s belief just because of their denomination. However the point I was making was that I ONLY saw Catholics talk about this… likewise I ONLY see Catholics talk about the godhood of Mary… so when I see the only group talking about something is one I have deemed to be a cult I tend to be a bit more cautious.

@LoveMyHorseShazam

Жыл бұрын

What does the “Godhood” of Mary mean?

@WholeBibleBelieverWoman

Жыл бұрын

@@LoveMyHorseShazam Catholics believe that Mary was herself born in an "immaculate conception." This is one reason they insist she never had any children after Jesus -- because they worship her as a sort of "eternal virgin." I look up to Mary, but I totally disagree with the Catholics' practice of saying the rosary and praying to Mary (and other saints). Mary was a (blessed) human woman who submitted to God's plan without argument, even though she knew it could cause her all manner of public shame. She answered the angel who told her what was to happen, "For he hath regarded the low estate of his handmaiden: for, behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed" (Luke 1:48). And blessed she is INDEED...!

Thanks for sharing. Mike Wenger’s 6 hour head covering video is very thorough and he explains why the hair isn’t the covering. It’s long but worth a listen.

@MelissaGrimes9371

Жыл бұрын

I'm listing to his video now, very informative.

@goblintown

Жыл бұрын

Any way you could summarize his take on it?

@JesusMyLove14

11 ай бұрын

@@goblintown kzread.info/dash/bejne/opmum7dqptbOcdo.html

@JesusMyLove14

11 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/opmum7dqptbOcdo.html

@1Sackettgirl

5 ай бұрын

Would you summarize Mike's thoughts on the covering. You mentioned that he agreed that it was never the hair, but does he weasel out of women wearing it today?

This video encouraged me so much & is a great support! Im a young wife and mother and feel this conviction too. Thank you for posting this!!!

I so appreciate your video. I also went through what you have gone through and I have found such peace while covering my head in church. I’m the only one who covers her head in church and I honestly don’t care anymore. I just feel such peace that I’m doing the right thing. It is wonderful and encouraging though when you find someone else who does. I love all the points you have shared. As my children are getting older, they are starting to question my head covering and so it is wonderful to see a young modern lady like you share her convictions. All glory to God! May the Holy Spirit keep on leading you and your husband. Thanks again!

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

Wow! Thank you for this comment 💕 I’m so encouraged to hear this!

@christianmama2441

Жыл бұрын

The Spencers, I am also the only lady covering at my church. Be an example to others of what christian women should behave like and look like, don't worry what they think, only worry what God thinks.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

@@christianmama2441 (I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12 A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes Reply for post if desired. It includes scriptures and commentary.

@justbreathe1148

8 ай бұрын

I love your scarf covering. How do you usually wesr it?

May peace be with you, I am Brother Soares from Brazil, today I am a non-denominational Christian, but I gather in the Name of Our Lord Jesus with other brothers, and women cover their heads with veils or scarves to pray and prophesy, I am very happy to know that in your country God also gave this clarification, I would love to get in touch via social media to introduce the brothers from Brazil, and meet them, it will be a pleasure, we have brothers who also obey this commandment in Angola, Mozambique and Republic of Buri, God bless them

I'm Catholic and I cover my head in church as well!

Thank you so much for your video. I'm a bit older than you as well (52), and head coverings are something I've gone back and forth in my mind for many years. I tried doing it a couple years ago but didn't stick with it, the fact that this keeps coming up in my mind tells me God wants me to do it. I second Mike Winger's 6hr video on head coverings. I'm in the process of watching it and find it very informative.

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

Awesome! I believe if you search scripture and pray on it, God will lead you to what you are supposed to do ❤️

Loving this video! Ive just started wearing a head covering, which is how i came across this video. New subscriber now by the way.😊🙏

I was watching a KZread q&a with a Mennonite mom, and the topic of her headcovering was asked about. She explained that she wore it beacause of 1 corinthians 11. Before then I had never heard a single teaching on headcoverings. I didn't even know it was in the bible! I immediately went to scripture and there it was. I wondered why I had never heard this before, and it became clear to me how important being in the word is. I started reading the bible for myself and just made it through the old testament last week. It is amazing to me that something that wasn't even on my radar a year ago became the very thing to draw me back to my bible. 😊

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

(I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12 A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes Reply for post if desired. It includes scriptures and commentary.

@leilawilliams8175

Жыл бұрын

If this Mary was unmarried she may not have worn a covering. Even if she was it would take all of a minute for her to take it off to use her hair like she did. It’s not clear in the English translations but in the original language 1 Corinthians was written in Paul mentions two different kinds of “covering.” The first, “katakalupto” that he said should NOT be done by men why praying and prophesying and SHOULD be done by women was a combination of two Greek words meaning basically “cloaking head.” The second “covering” mentioned is a noun “peribolaion” meaning something like an under-tunic. The first type of covering which must be done before prayer is what 4-7 are about and the second type, which a woman is already given naturally is in verses 14-15. Reading it with the knowledge of the Greek words makes it easier to understand that Paul was saying that a woman’s natural covering is her long hair which is her glory. However, when she is “praying or prophesying” she is also to wear a cloth covering to cover that glory, as a symbol that she is under authority.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

@@leilawilliams8175 you wrote: If this Mary was unmarried she may not have worn a covering. Even if she was it would take all of a minute for her to take it off to use her hair like she did. So you encourage women to wear fabric head coverings for Jesus. Yet for Mary to worship Jesus, with her hair physically touching Him, you conveniently set aside this New Covenant 'law' you have accepted. Since Jesus didn't rebuke her, or ever teach that women should wear fabric headcoverings, maybe you should reconsider this matter.

@PsalmThirtynineEleven

Жыл бұрын

user-iz8np3vv4i hates The Word of God so much, that they (it’s probably a rebellious woman) desperately feel the need to twist Scripture and insert their own idiocy into it.

@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj

11 ай бұрын

@@leilawilliams8175 Those who promote a cloth veil as a covering try to use the fact that this word perbolaiou is different than the word katakalupto to prove that it is talking about a “second covering” - the long hair being the first, katakalupto, and the veil being the second, perbolaiou. But, katakalupto is not a noun, and does not mean what these veil-promoters say it does. It shows a state of being, and is used as an adverb, say the scholars. Therefore, there are not two nouns - that is, two distinct coverings - being discussed. Rather, a state of being, or condition, is discussed: the man’s head is in a state or condition of being “not hanging-down, covered”, while the woman’s head is in a state of being “hanging-down, covered”. Her hair is given her for a “throw-around”. In other words, the hanging-down hair serves as a throw-around for her head - she is covered, and meets the condition first put forth: that she pray or prophesy with her long hair hanging down on her head. Since it is a shame for a man to have long hair, he is to pray to God with his head “not hanging-down, covered” -- ouk katakaluptesthai. The entire context of this discussion about authority and headship, and the hierarchy established by God, includes a discussion of long hair on women and short hair on men. There is never a mention of a piece of cloth. Consider: the veil is a man-made device to cover a God-given, natural state. It is an imitation of what God has already provided. The cloth veil was a common article worn by both men and women of the desert lands. It served a practical purpose in that it protected the head, hair, and face from the relentless hot sun and the blowing sands of the desert. It was not commanded by God, but was a practical invention. As the centuries wore on, it became a custom among certain cultures and religions. God does not bind man-made customs upon His people as immutable law! - Bernie Parsons

Yes! I wear a cloth head covering or hat at church every sunday and church gathering for about a year now. Garlands for Grace sells beautiful head coverings.

I stopped chopping my hair a few years ago. I choose to put it up in a bun. I like the idea of the head covering. Thank you for your video. This clears so much confusion on the head covering. It goes right along with dressing modestly and minding our mouths. Bless you dear 💜💕🙏🔥👑🔥🙏💕💜

@lis_daily_

10 ай бұрын

We grew up wearing our hair in a bun at church. I’ve felt convicted myself to go a step further with the covering! 🙌 Best wishes on your journey with this subject! ❤️

In the past Catholic women always wore head coverings especially in church . I still do . I have hats , scarfs , I even have these beautiful embroidered hijabs . And I wear them especially in church . My mother did it and so to I.

@lis_daily_

9 ай бұрын

I have visited a catholic church before and loved the veiling that the women wore!

Thank you for this video! I’m currently going through my own journey of wether I want to wear head coverings and am currently trying to do research on it and this video helps so much! god bless you

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

I’m excited for you! Make sure to check out the sermons I linked, I found them really helpful! ❤️

@JesusMyLove14

11 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/opmum7dqptbOcdo.html

I was saved 2 years ago. Was convicted of covering my head in prayer but was confused because no other Christian is doing it. I was covering during prayer. And recently I transition in covering full time. By God's grace He gives the courage to go out with headcovering. Noone has said anything so far. It is an outward sign that we agree to God's headship order. And it also actually gives spiritual protection, peace and freedom. Praise the Lord. God bless you all

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

(I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12 A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes Reply for post if desired. It includes scriptures and commentary.

@leilawilliams8175

Жыл бұрын

If this Mary was unmarried she may not have worn a covering. Even if she was it would take all of a minute for her to take it off to use her hair like she did. It’s not clear in the English translations but in the original language 1 Corinthians was written in Paul mentions two different kinds of “covering.” The first, “katakalupto” that he said should NOT be done by men why praying and prophesying and SHOULD be done by women was a combination of two Greek words meaning basically “cloaking head.” The second “covering” mentioned is a noun “peribolaion” meaning something like an under-tunic. The first type of covering which must be done before prayer is what 4-7 are about and the second type, which a woman is already given naturally is in verses 14-15. Reading it with the knowledge of the Greek words makes it easier to understand that Paul was saying that a woman’s natural covering is her long hair which is her glory. However, when she is “praying or prophesying” she is also to wear a cloth covering to cover that glory, as a symbol that she is under authority.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

@@leilawilliams8175 you wrote: If this Mary was unmarried she may not have worn a covering. Even if she was it would take all of a minute for her to take it off to use her hair like she did. So you encourage women to wear fabric head coverings for Jesus. Yet for Mary to worship Jesus, with her hair physically touching Him, you conveniently set aside this New Covenant 'law' you have accepted. Since Jesus didn't rebuke her, or ever teach that women should wear fabric headcoverings, maybe you should reconsider this matter.

@PsalmThirtynineEleven

Жыл бұрын

@ user-iz8np3vv4i Why do you hate God’s word? Why do you feel the need to blow up this comment section, with heresy and your prideful, angry opinions?! Ask *YOURSELF* these questions, because it’s painfully obvious you have a problem.

@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj

11 ай бұрын

@@leilawilliams8175 Those who promote a cloth veil as a covering try to use the fact that this word perbolaiou is different than the word katakalupto to prove that it is talking about a “second covering” - the long hair being the first, katakalupto, and the veil being the second, perbolaiou. But, katakalupto is not a noun, and does not mean what these veil-promoters say it does. It shows a state of being, and is used as an adverb, say the scholars. Therefore, there are not two nouns - that is, two distinct coverings - being discussed. Rather, a state of being, or condition, is discussed: the man’s head is in a state or condition of being “not hanging-down, covered”, while the woman’s head is in a state of being “hanging-down, covered”. Her hair is given her for a “throw-around”. In other words, the hanging-down hair serves as a throw-around for her head - she is covered, and meets the condition first put forth: that she pray or prophesy with her long hair hanging down on her head. Since it is a shame for a man to have long hair, he is to pray to God with his head “not hanging-down, covered” -- ouk katakaluptesthai. The entire context of this discussion about authority and headship, and the hierarchy established by God, includes a discussion of long hair on women and short hair on men. There is never a mention of a piece of cloth. Consider: the veil is a man-made device to cover a God-given, natural state. It is an imitation of what God has already provided. The cloth veil was a common article worn by both men and women of the desert lands. It served a practical purpose in that it protected the head, hair, and face from the relentless hot sun and the blowing sands of the desert. It was not commanded by God, but was a practical invention. As the centuries wore on, it became a custom among certain cultures and religions. God does not bind man-made customs upon His people as immutable law! - Bernie Parsons

May God bless you and may he continually cover you and those of that stand in those convictions in these confusing and spiritually dangerous days.

Context is key. This was a letter answering questions we do not have access to. However, the last 4 verses give the summary. Judge for yourselves, this was not an issue elsewhere, and not practiced. A woman's hair is given to her for a covering. Ultimately it is not a salvation issue, and no one should judge your decision either way.

Israël in ancient days had to cover what was beautiful and Holy such as the Mishnah, portable sanctuary tent. I found that interesting. While the head cover doesn’t save and we have to keep peace and unity within the church I have started covering and am not concerned what others are or aren’t doing. God is doing an awesome work in me and I am at that point where I am really focused on renewing my mind. I am more mindful of my role as a married woman and of Christ as our head. I feel blessed that the Lord has gotten me here. It speaks a lot to his hard work in my personal transformation. I am grateful to see other women have been called to separate from the World outwardly as well and thankful for you sharing your transformation as well.

This was first brought to my attention maybe 3 years ago but I’ve really been devoting myself to reading and learning what the Bible actually teaches. I agree that it’s a point of vanity for myself too. I really am trying to be more modest. Thank you 💕

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

The long hair of a woman is the 'covering'. I post on this a lot. Reply if desired. Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

❤️❤️

@PsalmThirtynineEleven

Жыл бұрын

@user-iz8np3vv4i You admit in other comments that you did not even watch this video. You also twist scripture, like a devil and insert personal opinions. We get it. You’re rebelling against God. Not us. You’re twisting *HIS* WORD, not ours. Think about it.

I truly agree with you, that covering your head means being submissive to your husband and God, May God bless you in your walk through through life.

Thank you for this testimony. I have considered this for many many years, I am 66. I want to please the Lord with all my heart. I will talk with my husband and continue to pray for understanding.

@lis_daily_

9 ай бұрын

The lord sees your heart and I commend you for being open to His word! 💕 Pray, and He will lead you to the truth 💕

@user-iz8np3vv4i

9 ай бұрын

...because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her... In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God? doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him? and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;... -Young's Literal Translation (YLT) Does even nature itself not teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him, but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her as a covering. -NASB A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 4 minutes, some scriptures outside of Corinthians. Essay by another: post length 12 minutes, scriptures only within Corinthians Reply for post(s) if desired. They includes scriptures and commentary.

Covering and covered are different. We are called to worship our creator all times and pray all the time. Therefore I cover all the time now. Shalom and thanks for sharing pray Yah keeps growing you in your understanding 🤲♥️

@justinegilman9504

Жыл бұрын

I’ve recently been feeling the need to cover and have been the last two days. I know, not a long time 🤣 but I already feel better about myself ❤️

@matrafa

Жыл бұрын

Does this mean that mean shouldn’t wear hats, because they should also be praying continuously?

@leilawilliams8175

Жыл бұрын

I would say it means men should at least be removing them often since we are to "pray without ceasing." In the old days when men wore hats they whisked them off whenever they wanted to show honor to something or someone. It's not that hard.

@dianaludwig6861

Жыл бұрын

I am covering all the time also because I pray all the time while I am doing my housework or outside chores. The only time I don't cover my hair is after I wash it. It takes hours for it to dry because it is thick and very long.

@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj

11 ай бұрын

Those who promote a cloth veil as a covering try to use the fact that this word perbolaiou is different than the word katakalupto to prove that it is talking about a “second covering” - the long hair being the first, katakalupto, and the veil being the second, perbolaiou. But, katakalupto is not a noun, and does not mean what these veil-promoters say it does. It shows a state of being, and is used as an adverb, say the scholars. Therefore, there are not two nouns - that is, two distinct coverings - being discussed. Rather, a state of being, or condition, is discussed: the man’s head is in a state or condition of being “not hanging-down, covered”, while the woman’s head is in a state of being “hanging-down, covered”. Her hair is given her for a “throw-around”. In other words, the hanging-down hair serves as a throw-around for her head - she is covered, and meets the condition first put forth: that she pray or prophesy with her long hair hanging down on her head. Since it is a shame for a man to have long hair, he is to pray to God with his head “not hanging-down, covered” -- ouk katakaluptesthai. The entire context of this discussion about authority and headship, and the hierarchy established by God, includes a discussion of long hair on women and short hair on men. There is never a mention of a piece of cloth. Consider: the veil is a man-made device to cover a God-given, natural state. It is an imitation of what God has already provided. The cloth veil was a common article worn by both men and women of the desert lands. It served a practical purpose in that it protected the head, hair, and face from the relentless hot sun and the blowing sands of the desert. It was not commanded by God, but was a practical invention. As the centuries wore on, it became a custom among certain cultures and religions. God does not bind man-made customs upon His people as immutable law! - Bernie Parsons

I came to this conviction 6 years ago. Well, actually I kinda flirted with covering already some 17 years ago but I was not consistent due to lack of others practising this and due to lack of teaching on the subject. I am very thankful to sosial media in this regard. I have found headcovering community and teaching on the subject. I personally love headcovering and wear it at all times (unless am home just hanging around in my t-shirt and sweat pants haha).

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

❤️❤️

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12 A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes Reply for post if desired. It includes scriptures and commentary.

@JesusMyLove14

11 ай бұрын

@@user-iz8np3vv4i ❤❤

Thanks for this Lis. You ARE totally right. Another great video that explains this really clearly is the one by the Headcovering Movement where the guy presenting explains the Greek translations. Well done to you for being obedient to God's word.

It is so beautiful that you are sharing this, I recently uploaded a video on this topic on my channel too. I was raised in a church where all women covered their heads so it was very normal for me to see, and I am so thankful for that ❤

Inspiring so much may God guide us all to the right path

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

Amen! ❤

I grew up with the Eastern Orthodox church and I remember years ago all ladles covered their heads. I see a decline this observance in recent years. I have short hair but still always cover when praying or prophesying 🙏

Love your explanation!

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

❤❤

Great video!!! So proud of you!! You are very courageous!!! Stop apologizing for the truth!! Thanking you for this video!!!

Thank you thank you!!!! I am always the only one in a gathering wearing a covering, often being avoided because of it. I have been doing this for more than 40 years and the only place I have been accepted was in a Brethren assembly in the south where all the women cover their heads.

@lis_daily_

9 ай бұрын

The churches we have gone to have been very loving and accepting of the headcovering so that’s great! Sorry that had not always been your experience! 🥲

A very beautiful choice God Bless you !!!!!

I too have started covering my head now in church. When i was younger most of the women did. I was away from church for a long time. Since i have been back it was not heavy on my heart until probably a few months ago - now i do wear head coverings, but no one else at my church does. Thanks for sharing this x

@lis_daily_

8 ай бұрын

I love this story 💕 thank you for sharing.

Well said, Lis! God bless.

I totally agree with everything you said! God bless you! I grew up wearing the covering all the time, and I still do, but I don't think that God commands that we wear it all the time or why would have told us when to wear it, if He expected us to wear it all the time. The main reason I still wear it all the time, is because of that Scripture that says to wear it wear it "While praying or prophesying" and I pray a lot, so I don't want to be running for my head covering all the time. But I can't say that I feel like it must be worn all the time. Thanks so much for your testimony. It was such a blessing to hear of somebody who's willing to be counter cultural in order to obey Christ's command.

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

❤️❤️🙌

@leilawilliams8175

Жыл бұрын

I'm in the same boat. While I don't think it's required to have it on every second when I am awake I never know when I will want to pray or start speaking scripture to my kids so I prefer to just wear a headcovering all day.

@debijohnson7637

8 ай бұрын

The Bible does say to pray without ceasing!

Growing up at my church, we always covered our heads.

The Head Covering Movement is a great channel to learn more about this. There are even testimonials of other women who were convicted on this issue and even head covering tutorials. God bless!

@lis_daily_

7 ай бұрын

I followed them for a little while on Instagram!

@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj

6 ай бұрын

@@lis_daily_ Sorry but these are extremists and if you offer any proof contrary to their beliefs they will delete your comment. Also a lot of their videos they do not allow comments at all.

I think it helps society as a whole when out in public, as a man it makes me feel more obliged to look at women as something sacred

This is absolutely something I have been thinking about since I got married. I wasn’t taught anything about head coverings. I came across those verses in my own study hours and I didn’t and don’t know how to interpret it. Obviously we don’t cover our heads culturally where I live and even in church women don’t cover their heads but I never thought about how feminism could have changed a long standing tradition or interpretation. It’s something I will be looking into more for sure.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

Lindsey (I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12 A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes Reply for post if desired. It includes scriptures and commentary.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

@@lindsey6975 Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. -NASB version If the above scripture means a turban, for example, why would God require the priests to wear turbans? Paul certainly would have known about this and maybe seen it. You shall speak to all the skillful people whom I have endowed with the spirit of wisdom, that they make Aaron’s garments to consecrate him, that he may serve as priest to Me. And these are the garments which they shall make: a breastpiece, an ephod, a robe, a tunic of checkered work, a turban, and a sash. They shall make holy garments for your brother Aaron and his sons, so that he may serve as priest to Me. -excerpt Exodus 28 Jesus prayed with something on His head while on the cross. A crown of thorns. And they dressed Him in purple, and after twisting together a crown of thorns, they put it on Him; and they began saluting Him: “Hail, King of the Jews!” -excerpt Mark 15 And Jesus, crying out with a loud voice, said, “Father, into Your hands I entrust My spirit.” And having said this, He died. -excerpt Luke 23 ******************************************* At least twice a woman's hair was not only visible to Jesus Himself, but it touched Him. Neither woman was rebuked. Since Jesus didn't care about fabric head coverings why should we? “Do you see this woman? I entered your house; you gave me no water for my feet, but she has wet my feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. You gave me no kiss, but from the time I came in she has not ceased to kiss my feet. You did not anoint my head with oil, but she has anointed my feet with ointment. Therefore I tell you, her sins, which are many, are forgiven-for she loved much. -excerpt Luke 7 Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. But Judas Iscariot, one of His disciples, the one who intended to betray Him, said, “Why was this perfume not sold for three hundred denarii and the proceeds given to poor people?” Now he said this, not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief, and as he kept the money box, he used to steal from what was put into it. Therefore Jesus said, “Leave her alone... -excerpt John 12 ************* It can only mean the hair is the covering, as the NASB states here: Does even nature itself not teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him, but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her as a covering. ************ No Old Covenant law requiring women to wear a fabric covering. Therefore no Old Testament reference available. 1 Corinthians 11 starts with this: ...hold firmly to the traditions, just as I handed them down to you... Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ. Now I praise you because you remember me in everything and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I handed them down to you. But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ. Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. But every woman who has her head uncovered... So, there was no Old Covenant law requiring women to wear a fabric covering. There was no time to establish a tradition of a fabric covering. There was no way to "hold firmly to the traditions" because you can't start a 'tradition' in a period of time that is just a few years. ************ If the covering was a physical covering, then hair length is irrelevant. No one would know if the woman had long hair or no hair. ************ Also, if a woman needs to touch and pick up something physical, before she can communicate with God, that would make the fabric covering an idol. But one could also say it was a talisman I suppose, since a talisman could be an article of clothing. Talisman (basic definition)- a piece of clothing (or other physical object) that is believed to have spiritual or magical properties. The object will align with your intention for its use. Every time you look at a talisman, your mind will recall the original intention of its use, until wearing it becomes a necessary ritual. ************ There is also an essay by 'FA'. It's about a 5 minute read. The full essay is available if requested. Once again one must keep in mind when reading the essay, that women were not using a fabric covering as a requirement of the Law. So it was not part of the culture then. That is confirmed by the events of Jesus with the 2 women above and also the scriptures that discourage women from braiding their hair. If women were commonly wearing a head covering in public no one would have known about this braiding. Their head and hair would have been covered by the fabric. ...likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire,... -excerpt 1 Timothy 2 ESV Do not let your adorning be external-the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear- but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart... -excerpt 1 Peter 3 ESV Excerpt here of post by FA: If these verses do not move you yet then here’s one that should definitely blow your mind. Paul asks you to make a judgment call in verse 13 as if one should naturally see a problem because he asks you to: "Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? " If “covering” really meant a veil then one would have to explain why anyone would possibly come up with a judgment that a woman praying or prophesying WITHOUT A FABRIC VEIL ON THEIR HEAD WOULD LOGICALLY OR NATURALLY LOOK WRONG? Someone needs to explain this logically. Be honest, does looking at someone doing this naturally create a thought that a veil is missing?

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

@@lindsey6975 (originally posted by FA) * Where the problem usually begins… (I) If we follow those who subscribe to the doctrine of women wearing veils then it can be argued that the most often cited verse in this teaching is 1st Corinth. 11:5, which states: “But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.” According to those who believe women ought to wear veils this verse implies that a woman’s uncovered head is someone who does not wear a veil, is wrong for failing to wear it and assumes that such a person already has long hair. Therefore, the conclusion is that it must be referring to an “additional” covering. Another conclusion is that if a woman ought to be covered only when praying and prophesying then it would seem as though it is something that can be taken on or off like a veil. A typical question from those who are against hair being “the covering” is usually something like this: “If a woman ONLY needs to cover during prophecy or prayer, then how can a woman take off her hair and then put it back on?” The logical response to this is: Where did you read the word: "Only?" Such a person assumes the Bible refers to an “exclusive condition” instead of viewing it as simply two examples being given. IF YOU TRULY BELIEVE IN THIS “EXCLUSIVITY INTERPRETATION” then an UNVEILED woman should be fine if they speak in tongues, interpret tongues, heal the sick, cast out devils, etc., right? As long as the woman is NOT praying or prophesying, then she need not wear a veil, right? If your answer is NO, then you admit that there are likely more instances where it would not look right and do not truly believe that ONLY under praying or prophesying does a woman need to be covered; thereby making the argument that the covering is removable based on two conditions, moot. So what can we say about this? Just that Paul is giving us a couple of examples of how doing something holy does not look right if she is uncovered, in other words not covered in hair. The question is: Is he really referring to the lack of a veil or the lack of hair meaning not having long hair? Also, please keep in mind that the word “veil” is not actually mentioned here, neither anything that IMPLICITLY states that the covering is something can be placed on or taken off. Here’s something to consider: imagine a woman with long flowing hair praying and prophesying without a veil. Would the lack of a veil really equate to someone as if they were shaven? Why would anyone come to this conclusion? It would seem a bit odd that a woman with long hair who is not wearing a veil should somehow be equated to being shaved. This is most certainly an odd thought pattern if we accept the veil interpretation. But it does fit the narrative of those who understand the word “uncovered” to mean “not covered in long hair” or simply put, “short hair.” Looking at a woman with short hair one can easily say that she might as well be shaved. So be honest, doesn’t it make more sense that when they refer to an uncovered woman they are referring to a woman with short hair? Wouldn’t that be MORE closely relatable to being shaven than to someone who has long hair but not wearing a veil being equated to someone shaved? To put it in another way it is not a big leap to make the correlation between short hair to being shaven, unlike being asked to make a GIGANTIC LEAP OF LOGIC that an unveiled woman (even with long flowing hair) is somehow equal to being shaved. Think about it. * Is the Covering Long Hair or a Veil? ….. (II) If we examine all the verses from verse 4 to 15 without bias we should at least conclude that the passages have something to do with the physical heads of both men and women. The question we should ask is: When they refer to “covered,” “cover,” “uncovered” and “covering” are they referring to hair that covers the head or some kind of veil? Some will even say both, but if we carefully examine verse 15 it would seem that we would be getting a clearer picture of what was being referred to in the earlier verses when it mentions the words, “covered,” “cover” and “uncovered." “But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her FOR a covering." If the covering is long hair then the words “covered” or “cover” which are synonymous to “covering,” should be understood as long hair as well. Then it makes sense when it says that it is shameful or dishonorable for a man to pray or prophesy with his head “covered” because they are referring to long hair. Now logically speaking wouldn’t being “uncovered” or “not covered” then mean short hair? Therefore, if to be covered refers to “long hair” then the opposite should be true, in that to be “uncovered” should be understood as having “short” hair. This is not complicated at all to understand it is basic logic. * You Should Naturally Know Right From Wrong by Just Looking…. (III) If these verses do not move you yet then here’s one that should definitely blow your mind. Paul asks you to make a judgment call in verse 13 as if one should naturally see a problem because he asks you to: "Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?" If “covering” really meant a veil then one would have to explain why anyone would possibly come up with a judgment that a woman praying or prophesying WITHOUT A FABRIC VEIL ON THEIR HEAD WOULD LOGICALLY OR NATURALLY LOOK WRONG? Someone needs to explain this logically. Be honest, does looking at someone doing this naturally create a thought that a veil is missing? I have never seen or heard anyone say: "What a shame she is not wearing a veil on her head” after looking at a woman with long hair while praying or prophesying, that would be ludicrous. There is no NATURAL or NORMAL reasoning to make such a judgment. But if the word “uncovered” were to mean "short hair." then it would make logical sense. Because if I see a woman who has a manly haircut doing these holy things like we read in verse 5, then I can naturally judge that something doesn’t look right. Also, the very next verse continues this line of thinking that things should be obvious to understand by mere observation in nature. "Doth not even NATURE itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him." 1st Corinthians 11:14 Note that verses 13 and 14 are two consecutive questions both of which asks you to NATURALLY ASSUME that there something wrong by SEEING a woman’s head to be uncovered (meaning having short hair) and a man having long hair (meaning being covered). I would like to also add that it is NOT jumping from a “veil” in 13 and then suddenly to “hair” in 14 like some would like to suggest, because you will note that verse 15 refers back again to the woman which FLAT OUT STATES the “covering” to mean “long hair.” Therefore there is NO EXCUSE to not understand the previous verses. By this simple understanding we can then understand the part where it states that it is shameful or dishonoring for a man to pray or prophesy with his head covered, meaning covered in long hair, like in verses 4: “Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.” This “dishonoring” of the head fits perfectly with verse 14 where it mentions that it is “shameful“ for a man to have long hair, therefore the topic is the same throughout the verses in that the head covered in this verse refers to “long hair. ” I should also add that these verses in NO WAY imply that the covering on the man can be placed on or taken off, like some like to argue. It’s SIMPLY SAYING that it is a dishonor if a man prays or prophesies in LONG HAIR. The same should be understood in verse 7: “For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.” Again, they are NOT implying something that can be put on or taken off but that the man should not cover his head (with long hair) and the reason because he is the image and glory of God. This same idea should be included in the verses that refer to women like in verse 6: “For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.” This verse is often misinterpreted like verse 5 when it’s simply mentioning in the same tone as the previous verse that if a woman has short hair then let her head be shaved BUT if it is a shame to be shaven let her be covered in long hair. It’s really not complicated once you understand what it means to be covered or uncovered. Everything else starts to make sense when you read the other verses knowing that they are referring to hair. I can only imagine how lost one must be when they are stuck on one or two verses that to them seems questionable but not take into consideration all the other verses that point to the “covering” as long hair and “uncovered” to mean short hair. Therefore, given all this logic and proof, how can one conclude that they are referring to a hat, bonnet or veil? Again, how can one have logical judgments or conclusions that by merely looking at a long-haired woman performing such holy acts without a veil that one would automatically assume that there is something off? It makes no logical sense. So before anyone gets riled up why not first try to EXPLAIN 1st Corinthians 11:13 because I suspect most people will simply ignore it. In short, therefore, the whole veil doctrine is wrong, it cannot be substantiated and should be rejected.

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

I’m so excited for you! 💕

@marriage4life893

10 ай бұрын

That's awesome! I hope your studies in the subject is going well and producing good fruit.

And this is to say nothing of the judgement and condemnation that comes from starting down the road to legalism as seen here in some of these posts against the young woman who made the video. Ladies, did you have to ditch your hair, nails, and make-up routine sometime after covering? Did your dress and sleeve length have to get longer as well? Did you have to start wearing only dark colors? If so, ya might be going the way of legalism. Remember that Jesus is enough. You earn nothing!!! A focus on outward adornment is discouraged by the scriptures. It doesn't mean people cannot look good (look nice) but FOCUSING is the key word. None of it should be our focus. Personally, I'm not a hair, nails, make-up person and I'm not super feminine by nature but i don't condemn my fellow sisters in the Lord for enjoying those little things that make them feel beautiful. Be careful. You know your own hearts. ❤

@mph1ish

4 ай бұрын

Modesty is never a bad thing.

We should pray about this! We should pray that God convicts more woman to do this. Like you said, there’s no arguing that God wants us to do it that way. I started head covering a month ago. I didn’t learn about head coverings until about a year ago but I recently learned about conviction so now I know that God definitely convicts.

Where did you get your head covering you're wearing in this video? Its very beautiful. New to the faith and its been on my heart to cover my head but im unsure where to get them from/ what type to order. Thank you for this video❤ very helpful.

Hi, a head covering should ideally cover most of hair. Many just slip it on slightly with much of the hair showing. It's not supposed to be fashionable or anything. Also, dyeing ones hair and painting ones nails, wearing makeup, I would definitely get rid of those things. These things are decoration of the flesh, many of these cosmetic things fall under the sin of worldliness and vanity. It's important on this path to purge these things, sanctification is very real and very important. I would also really pray about rings, wedding rings, they have pagan roots. Ripped jeans are definitely not for anyone Christian. These things are worldly fashion trends, which come from the kingdom of darkness. Pants on a woman is like a skirt on a man. We've been made to get used to how it looks so it seems normal, but it wasn't for a very long time. Deceptions increase in these end times. These things have nothing to do with legalism, but everything to do with sanctification and holiness. God bless

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

(I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12 A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes Reply for post if desired. It includes scriptures and commentary.

@agneswatters5818

Жыл бұрын

I would love to know

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

@@agneswatters5818 Agnes Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. -NASB version If the above scripture means a turban, for example, why would God require the priests to wear turbans? Paul certainly would have known about this and maybe seen it. You shall speak to all the skillful people whom I have endowed with the spirit of wisdom, that they make Aaron’s garments to consecrate him, that he may serve as priest to Me. And these are the garments which they shall make: a breastpiece, an ephod, a robe, a tunic of checkered work, a turban, and a sash. They shall make holy garments for your brother Aaron and his sons, so that he may serve as priest to Me. -excerpt Exodus 28 Jesus prayed with something on His head while on the cross. A crown of thorns. And they dressed Him in purple, and after twisting together a crown of thorns, they put it on Him; and they began saluting Him: “Hail, King of the Jews!” -excerpt Mark 15 And Jesus, crying out with a loud voice, said, “Father, into Your hands I entrust My spirit.” And having said this, He died. -excerpt Luke 23 ******************************************* At least twice a woman's hair was not only visible to Jesus Himself, but it touched Him. Neither woman was rebuked. Since Jesus didn't care about fabric head coverings why should we? “Do you see this woman? I entered your house; you gave me no water for my feet, but she has wet my feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. You gave me no kiss, but from the time I came in she has not ceased to kiss my feet. You did not anoint my head with oil, but she has anointed my feet with ointment. Therefore I tell you, her sins, which are many, are forgiven-for she loved much. -excerpt Luke 7 Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. But Judas Iscariot, one of His disciples, the one who intended to betray Him, said, “Why was this perfume not sold for three hundred denarii and the proceeds given to poor people?” Now he said this, not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief, and as he kept the money box, he used to steal from what was put into it. Therefore Jesus said, “Leave her alone... -excerpt John 12 ************* It can only mean the hair is the covering, as the NASB states here: Does even nature itself not teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him, but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her as a covering. ************ No Old Covenant law requiring women to wear a fabric covering. Therefore no Old Testament reference available. 1 Corinthians 11 starts with this: ...hold firmly to the traditions, just as I handed them down to you... Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ. Now I praise you because you remember me in everything and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I handed them down to you. But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ. Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. But every woman who has her head uncovered... So, there was no Old Covenant law requiring women to wear a fabric covering. There was no time to establish a tradition of a fabric covering. There was no way to "hold firmly to the traditions" because you can't start a 'tradition' in a period of time that is just a few years. ************ If the covering was a physical covering, then hair length is irrelevant. No one would know if the woman had long hair or no hair. ************ Also, if a woman needs to touch and pick up something physical, before she can communicate with God, that would make the fabric covering an idol. But one could also say it was a talisman I suppose, since a talisman could be an article of clothing. Talisman (basic definition)- a piece of clothing (or other physical object) that is believed to have spiritual or magical properties. The object will align with your intention for its use. Every time you look at a talisman, your mind will recall the original intention of its use, until wearing it becomes a necessary ritual. ************ There is also an essay by 'FA'. It's about a 5 minute read. The full essay is available if requested. Once again one must keep in mind when reading the essay, that women were not using a fabric covering as a requirement of the Law. So it was not part of the culture then. That is confirmed by the events of Jesus with the 2 women above and also the scriptures that discourage women from braiding their hair. If women were commonly wearing a head covering in public no one would have known about this braiding. Their head and hair would have been covered by the fabric. ...likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire,... -excerpt 1 Timothy 2 ESV Do not let your adorning be external-the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear- but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart... -excerpt 1 Peter 3 ESV Excerpt here of post by FA: If these verses do not move you yet then here’s one that should definitely blow your mind. Paul asks you to make a judgment call in verse 13 as if one should naturally see a problem because he asks you to: "Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? " If “covering” really meant a veil then one would have to explain why anyone would possibly come up with a judgment that a woman praying or prophesying WITHOUT A FABRIC VEIL ON THEIR HEAD WOULD LOGICALLY OR NATURALLY LOOK WRONG? Someone needs to explain this logically. Be honest, does looking at someone doing this naturally create a thought that a veil is missing?

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

@@agneswatters5818 Agnes (post by FA below) * Where the problem usually begins… (I) If we follow those who subscribe to the doctrine of women wearing veils then it can be argued that the most often cited verse in this teaching is 1st Corinth. 11:5, which states: “But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.” According to those who believe women ought to wear veils this verse implies that a woman’s uncovered head is someone who does not wear a veil, is wrong for failing to wear it and assumes that such a person already has long hair. Therefore, the conclusion is that it must be referring to an “additional” covering. Another conclusion is that if a woman ought to be covered only when praying and prophesying then it would seem as though it is something that can be taken on or off like a veil. A typical question from those who are against hair being “the covering” is usually something like this: “If a woman ONLY needs to cover during prophecy or prayer, then how can a woman take off her hair and then put it back on?” The logical response to this is: Where did you read the word: "Only?" Such a person assumes the Bible refers to an “exclusive condition” instead of viewing it as simply two examples being given. IF YOU TRULY BELIEVE IN THIS “EXCLUSIVITY INTERPRETATION” then an UNVEILED woman should be fine if they speak in tongues, interpret tongues, heal the sick, cast out devils, etc., right? As long as the woman is NOT praying or prophesying, then she need not wear a veil, right? If your answer is NO, then you admit that there are likely more instances where it would not look right and do not truly believe that ONLY under praying or prophesying does a woman need to be covered; thereby making the argument that the covering is removable based on two conditions, moot. So what can we say about this? Just that Paul is giving us a couple of examples of how doing something holy does not look right if she is uncovered, in other words not covered in hair. The question is: Is he really referring to the lack of a veil or the lack of hair meaning not having long hair? Also, please keep in mind that the word “veil” is not actually mentioned here, neither anything that IMPLICITLY states that the covering is something can be placed on or taken off. Here’s something to consider: imagine a woman with long flowing hair praying and prophesying without a veil. Would the lack of a veil really equate to someone as if they were shaven? Why would anyone come to this conclusion? It would seem a bit odd that a woman with long hair who is not wearing a veil should somehow be equated to being shaved. This is most certainly an odd thought pattern if we accept the veil interpretation. But it does fit the narrative of those who understand the word “uncovered” to mean “not covered in long hair” or simply put, “short hair.” Looking at a woman with short hair one can easily say that she might as well be shaved. So be honest, doesn’t it make more sense that when they refer to an uncovered woman they are referring to a woman with short hair? Wouldn’t that be MORE closely relatable to being shaven than to someone who has long hair but not wearing a veil being equated to someone shaved? To put it in another way it is not a big leap to make the correlation between short hair to being shaven, unlike being asked to make a GIGANTIC LEAP OF LOGIC that an unveiled woman (even with long flowing hair) is somehow equal to being shaved. Think about it. * Is the Covering Long Hair or a Veil? ….. (II) If we examine all the verses from verse 4 to 15 without bias we should at least conclude that the passages have something to do with the physical heads of both men and women. The question we should ask is: When they refer to “covered,” “cover,” “uncovered” and “covering” are they referring to hair that covers the head or some kind of veil? Some will even say both, but if we carefully examine verse 15 it would seem that we would be getting a clearer picture of what was being referred to in the earlier verses when it mentions the words, “covered,” “cover” and “uncovered." “But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her FOR a covering." If the covering is long hair then the words “covered” or “cover” which are synonymous to “covering,” should be understood as long hair as well. Then it makes sense when it says that it is shameful or dishonorable for a man to pray or prophesy with his head “covered” because they are referring to long hair. Now logically speaking wouldn’t being “uncovered” or “not covered” then mean short hair? Therefore, if to be covered refers to “long hair” then the opposite should be true, in that to be “uncovered” should be understood as having “short” hair. This is not complicated at all to understand it is basic logic. * You Should Naturally Know Right From Wrong by Just Looking…. (III) If these verses do not move you yet then here’s one that should definitely blow your mind. Paul asks you to make a judgment call in verse 13 as if one should naturally see a problem because he asks you to: "Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?" If “covering” really meant a veil then one would have to explain why anyone would possibly come up with a judgment that a woman praying or prophesying WITHOUT A FABRIC VEIL ON THEIR HEAD WOULD LOGICALLY OR NATURALLY LOOK WRONG? Someone needs to explain this logically. Be honest, does looking at someone doing this naturally create a thought that a veil is missing? I have never seen or heard anyone say: "What a shame she is not wearing a veil on her head” after looking at a woman with long hair while praying or prophesying, that would be ludicrous. There is no NATURAL or NORMAL reasoning to make such a judgment. But if the word “uncovered” were to mean "short hair." then it would make logical sense. Because if I see a woman who has a manly haircut doing these holy things like we read in verse 5, then I can naturally judge that something doesn’t look right. Also, the very next verse continues this line of thinking that things should be obvious to understand by mere observation in nature. "Doth not even NATURE itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him." 1st Corinthians 11:14 Note that verses 13 and 14 are two consecutive questions both of which asks you to NATURALLY ASSUME that there something wrong by SEEING a woman’s head to be uncovered (meaning having short hair) and a man having long hair (meaning being covered). I would like to also add that it is NOT jumping from a “veil” in 13 and then suddenly to “hair” in 14 like some would like to suggest, because you will note that verse 15 refers back again to the woman which FLAT OUT STATES the “covering” to mean “long hair.” Therefore there is NO EXCUSE to not understand the previous verses. By this simple understanding we can then understand the part where it states that it is shameful or dishonoring for a man to pray or prophesy with his head covered, meaning covered in long hair, like in verses 4: “Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.” This “dishonoring” of the head fits perfectly with verse 14 where it mentions that it is “shameful“ for a man to have long hair, therefore the topic is the same throughout the verses in that the head covered in this verse refers to “long hair. ” I should also add that these verses in NO WAY imply that the covering on the man can be placed on or taken off, like some like to argue. It’s SIMPLY SAYING that it is a dishonor if a man prays or prophesies in LONG HAIR. The same should be understood in verse 7: “For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.” Again, they are NOT implying something that can be put on or taken off but that the man should not cover his head (with long hair) and the reason because he is the image and glory of God. This same idea should be included in the verses that refer to women like in verse 6: “For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.” This verse is often misinterpreted like verse 5 when it’s simply mentioning in the same tone as the previous verse that if a woman has short hair then let her head be shaved BUT if it is a shame to be shaven let her be covered in long hair. It’s really not complicated once you understand what it means to be covered or uncovered. Everything else starts to make sense when you read the other verses knowing that they are referring to hair. I can only imagine how lost one must be when they are stuck on one or two verses that to them seems questionable but not take into consideration all the other verses that point to the “covering” as long hair and “uncovered” to mean short hair. Therefore, given all this logic and proof, how can one conclude that they are referring to a hat, bonnet or veil? Again, how can one have logical judgments or conclusions that by merely looking at a long-haired woman performing such holy acts without a veil that one would automatically assume that there is something off? It makes no logical sense. So before anyone gets riled up why not first try to EXPLAIN 1st Corinthians 11:13 because I suspect most people will simply ignore it. In short, therefore, the whole veil doctrine is wrong, it cannot be substantiated and should be rejected.

@leilawilliams8175

Жыл бұрын

It’s not clear in the English translations but in the original language 1 Corinthians was written in Paul mentions two different kinds of “covering.” The first, “katakalupto” that he said should NOT be done by men why praying and prophesying and SHOULD be done by women was a combination of two Greek words meaning basically “cloaking head.” The second “covering” mentioned is a noun “peribolaion” meaning something like an under-tunic. The first type of covering which must be done before prayer is what 4-7 are about and the second type, which a woman is already given naturally is in verses 14-15. Reading it with the knowledge of the Greek words makes it easier to understand that Paul was saying that a woman’s natural covering is her long hair which is her glory. However, when she is “praying or prophesying” she is also to wear a cloth covering to cover that glory, as a symbol that she is under authority. Besides, any glance at history shows that religious women veiled with a cloth covering and still do in most cultures.

I came to to this same conclusion. After almost of year of studying. I brought it up to a few friends men, women, parents. People think I’m crazy. Lol okay exaggeration but no one agrees.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

(I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12 A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes Reply for post if desired. It includes scriptures and commentary.

@leilawilliams8175

Жыл бұрын

I agree with you that headcovering is right and so do most of the families we hang out with. Be encouraged you are not delusional!

@leilawilliams8175

Жыл бұрын

If this Mary was unmarried she may not have worn a covering. Even if she was it would take all of a minute for her to take it off to use her hair like she did. It’s not clear in the English translations but in the original language 1 Corinthians was written in Paul mentions two different kinds of “covering.” The first, “katakalupto” that he said should NOT be done by men why praying and prophesying and SHOULD be done by women was a combination of two Greek words meaning basically “cloaking head.” The second “covering” mentioned is a noun “peribolaion” meaning something like an under-tunic. The first type of covering which must be done before prayer is what 4-7 are about and the second type, which a woman is already given naturally is in verses 14-15. Reading it with the knowledge of the Greek words makes it easier to understand that Paul was saying that a woman’s natural covering is her long hair which is her glory. However, when she is “praying or prophesying” she is also to wear a cloth covering to cover that glory, as a symbol that she is under authority.

@JesusMyLove14

11 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/opmum7dqptbOcdo.html

@JesusMyLove14

11 ай бұрын

If you find that no one agrees with you then the logical step is to find out why. Being the only one to believe in a certain doctrine doesn't qualify as being right, ya know? Do yourself a favor and invest more time in this subject .

This was really encouraging. I feel like you we me talking. I questioned how I had been taught about this for years… cause when I read in the Bible, it really didn’t seem like a cultural issue to me. But I would just reason that surely out of all the people in my church and the pastors I looked up to, that I wasn’t the one who had it right. I would listen to sermons by pastors to try to understand why we shouldn’t cover and to ease my conscience. But one day in my Bible reading I was reading essentially about the character of God and how he cares about how we worship Him and it was like and anvil “head covering” dropped on my head, so I said “fine”! And for the first time was willing to actually consider the other point of view. I concluded that if I was honest and consistent in my Bible interpretation, that they they had the more convincing argument. How could I think I would die for Christ if I wasn’t willing to even be a little culturally awkward at church? It HAS been a hard adjustment for me…. I also live my hair and getting ready for church use to be so much easier. Also I go to church with my dad. He was someone trying to convince me that I didn’t need to cover. He has made it known that he is VERY against my covering. I feel like he’s ashamed of me. I’m a grown almost 40 year old married woman and it’s still hard to know your parent disapproves of my husband and my decision. So on top of the awkwardness, I just have to remember that God is my judge and approval of man is just another thing I have to die to. I also fear people not understanding and thinking that I think that I’m better than them… or them thinking that I’m stupid for not believing this isn’t just a cultural issue. So yeah - it’s brought up lots of sun struggles in my heart apparently! 🤪

@lis_daily_

7 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for sharing your story! I want to give you a hug! I’m so glad you are listening to what the Lord is telling you. You are so brave to me 🫶

Where did you buy your head scarf? It’s so pretty. Thanks for sharing ❤

Hi thanks for sharing. I’m Muslim and in our holy book Quran mentioned to cover our hair all the time . I didn’t know that bible want Christian women to cover Thair hair,as well. I just wanted to quit my veil ,because I thought why other holy book didn’t ask women .

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

marziah (I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) ...because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her... In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God? doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him? and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;... -Young's Literal Translation (YLT) A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. Some are confused about this subject in Christianity marziah. Many Christian women use a fabric covering, but the long hair itself is actually the 'covering'. _________________________________________________ Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12

@davidaggrey4568

9 ай бұрын

@user-iz8np3vv4i Head covering is a must for women in the church or when praying. Read the bible well let the holy spirit teach you.

Great video! Thanks, sister! Hope that many more women in Christ will follow your lead. God bless you! In 1 Corinthians 11:16, Paul responded to any readers who may disagree with his teaching about the use of headcoverings: "But if one is inclined to be contentious, we have no other practice, nor have the churches of God." This may indicate that headcoverings were considered a standard, universal Christian symbolic practice (rather than a local cultural custom). In other words, while churches were spread out geographically and contained a diversity of cultures, they all practiced headcovering for female members.

This video was very insightful, I have recently been convicted over this as well, and I am just now starting to research the topic of head coverings. I am leaning towards wearing head coverings, but just as a side question: where do you get yours from? The one you're wearing in the video is so adorable! Thank you again for this video, God bless!

@user-iz8np3vv4i

Жыл бұрын

(I didn't watch this video but am familiar with this subject.) In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God? doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him? and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;... -Young's Literal Translation (YLT) Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. -excerpt John 12 A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. My thoughts: post length 7 minutes Reply for post if desired. It includes scriptures and commentary.

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

Thank you! I got mine from Walmart and Amazon. I got both of mine to be neutral colors so they match all outfits.

​ To @barryallen119 The only thing that was universally practiced is the custom of women having their hair long and men's short. It is false to say that Paul was referring to veils or hats as though the idea of wearing a foreign object is somehow “universal”. The contentious part that Paul was referring to was the issue of using the wrong hair length by men and women. If someone was “wanting their own way and did not want to submit to something” it would be the idea of women choosing to have short hair (aka uncovered) and men choosing to have long hair (aka covered) instead of submitting to the order God made in regards to hair length, Not a veil Just because someone says that the Lord is commanding Churches to practice the wearing of veils does not make it true. But what if it’s someone’s interpretation of a doctrine then we have NO OBLIGATION to follow it. So many churches do this today on many subjects that it is a joke within the non-believing community that not even Christians can agree to several doctrines. Every church nowadays has its own take on doctrines, for example, it has been noted that if we carry the same idea (of not adhering to the doctrine of head covering) over to water baptism, that by refusing to be baptized in water we are somehow being disobedient? That if one wishes to “commit” their life to the Lord, one MUST be baptized because THEY think that WATER baptism is a command WHEN IT ISN’T. Any thinking and Bible-reading Christian should know by now that there is more than one kind of baptism. John the Baptist made it extremely clear early in the beginning of the gospels when he said “I baptize you with WATER but he who comes after me will baptize you with FIRE and the HOLY SPIRIT. Any lay Christian can understand there is a distinction. Reading any old dictionary shows that baptism means to be IMMERSED and not just by water as John is obviously helping us to understand. But unfortunately for some when they read the word baptism, they cannot separate water from this word. Therefore when Jesus said go and baptize others in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost he was not referring to water baptism. Confirmation of this is when Paul said: “I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, lest anyone should say that I had baptized in my own name. Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas. Besides, I do not know whether I baptized any other. For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect.” 1st Corinthians 1:14-17. Now of course this does not mean that one cannot be water baptized because it is fine to do so but neither should it be placed in the level of a command when that was never the case. For even Paul performed a few that he could barely recollect meaning he was NOT doing this on a regular basis like some sects want us to think should be the norm. There shouldn’t be any reason to think that being water baptized as strange but if you follow a misinterpretation then to an avid Bible reader it would not only be odd but wrong. It would be nice if there were no arguments about this or other doctrines but they still need to be confronted and there is nothing wrong with arguing about these subjects just as the disciples argued about whether men should be circumcised. “Therefore, when Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and dispute with them (meaning it was not a small dissension or argument), they determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others of them should go up to Jerusalem, to the apostles and elders, about this question.” Acts 15:2 So there is nothing wrong with arguing according to the Bible, but to make it appear that arguing is wrong in order to appear pious or more righteous is a mistake and devious.

@JohnYoder-vi1gj

10 ай бұрын

Agree100%

My dear friend, My name is Clinton, and I am a Christian minister. I thank you for posting this video, and it is wonderful that you are set to obey God, and that you are learning to cover your head, which is something that godly women do, and have done for millenia (it is seen in both testaments of the Bible). If I may, in the love of Jesus Christ, I am compelled by the Holy Ghost to offer you some counsel. Please know that this is not an attack against you, but a word of love from God to edify you, and I hope that you will share this with your husband also. 1. In this video, your head is not covered. The purpose of covering your head is to cover your hair, which is a glory to you, and it is part of your nakedness and your natural beauty (1 Corinthians 11:15, Isaiah 57:1-3). A woman's long, beautiful hair is not to be displayed in public. It is for her husband to enjoy, and not for anyone else to see. This is why she is to be covered in the presence of God and his angels. 2. The book that you are reading from in this video is not God's word. In the English language, God's word is preserved for us in the Holy Bible, King James Version. Other English bibles that do not say the same thing are not God's word. They are copyrighted novels. 3. If you go on to seek and serve God, he will show you that his daughters do not paint their faces, or apply fake fingernails, which look very much like claws. You are a woman of a beautiful countenance, and whoever told you that you need to paint your face to be attractive lied to you. Face painting was taught to women by the fallen angels, and only whores paint their faces. (2 Kings 9:30, Jeremiah 4:30) You will be so much more beautiful when you wash that paint off your face... May these things be a blessing to you in Jesus' name, and I am here for you if you or your husband have questions. Sincerely, Bro. Clinton sotvaliant1@gmail.com

@YvonneSt.Louis81789

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for this. I was looking at all the comments and could not believe no one mentioned her nails or makeup.

@Abcdefghijajajaja

7 ай бұрын

Bravo 👏🏼

Thank you for this video because It's easy for us who are on this journey to feel lonely and misunderstood, or branded with the "holier than thou" name, so thank you for posting this! It is so encouraging. I'm the ONLY one at my church who covers as well. I've had several conversations about the real meaning of that chapter, but they usually just look at me like I'm speaking a foreign language to them LOL. I don't get into debates about it, but when I'm asked why, I tell them why. But anyway LOL As for me, I pray throughout the day and night, while I'm driving, washing the dishes, while studying the Bible, praying on my face or wherever and whenever, so I wear some sort of covering all day, mainly because of 1 Cor. 11:13. I'm not saying that I pray 24/7, I'm saying I pray off and on throughout the day....just putting that out there LOL Mostly I have on a baseball cap, and some times like while at church or a gathering I wear a cloth, silk or whatever on my head. I'm also growing out a pixie cut so my hair is still really short. That helps me keep the scissors' out of it! When it gets in these awkward stages I want to chop it off again. The struggle is real yall! LOL

Thank you so much for your video, this is so helpful. I also just watched the first video that you posted underneath this one and I love that one too. I'm just like wowwww when he is talking about Isaiah 53 and the silent Christ . BTW, I have been headcovering in church for some time now and got questions about it the other day so I'm back watching videos again ;-). Do you also stay silent in church? Prayer etc?

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

Yes! There are bible studies etc but in church women are silent other than singing although I’ve been to churches where women will pray out loud and I don’t think that’s wrong but i personally choose not to.

@NoyzRose492

Жыл бұрын

@@lis_daily_ Good to hear!!! :)

I covered my hair when I go bed 🛌 & when I pray 🙏🏾 at home at my apartment & I go church ⛪️ covered my head I have respect to the Lord

@lis_daily_

8 ай бұрын

Thank you for sharing ❤️

I tried covering last year but suffered migraines from wrapping scarves so I gave up. Now I've found that wearing more simple coverings with my scarves has meant that I can cover again 😁

Thanks for sharing! Personally, (right or wrong), as soon as I wholeheartedly prayed to become closer to God, a huge attraction to baseball caps captivated me. After a decade or 2, hoodies became my security blanket & I tossed my cap collection. FF another decade & I'm once again attracted to caps, with a cloth quality. Each decade I've drawn closer to God, btw, but still have a ways to go. I find your own insights quite refreshing & confirming. Thanks!

I'm one of the only women at my church who covers as well. Mike Winger's video is what convinced me it was taught in scripture for married women in corporate worship. I honestly had never heard any teaching on those verses until that video. I was shocked like you were that it had been basically a common practice until western feminism. I even verified with my aunts and grandma, who confirmed that yes my grandma and all the Christian women back then used to wear coverings and hats every Sunday. It's scary how quickly the significance of something can be lost within just a generation. It's easy to see how humans historically fall away from God so quickly, within one or two generations at most, when not being intentional.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

5 ай бұрын

At least twice a woman's hair was not only visible to Jesus Himself, but it touched Him. Neither woman was rebuked. Since Jesus didn't care about fabric head coverings why should we? “Do you see this woman? I entered your house; you gave me no water for my feet, but she has wet my feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. You gave me no kiss, but from the time I came in she has not ceased to kiss my feet. You did not anoint my head with oil, but she has anointed my feet with ointment. Therefore I tell you, her sins, which are many, are forgiven-for she loved much. -excerpt Luke 7 Mary then took a pound of very expensive perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. But Judas Iscariot, one of His disciples, the one who intended to betray Him, said, “Why was this perfume not sold for three hundred denarii and the proceeds given to poor people?” Now he said this, not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief, and as he kept the money box, he used to steal from what was put into it. Therefore Jesus said, “Leave her alone... -excerpt John 12

@adriannelea1

5 ай бұрын

@@user-iz8np3vv4i 1 Cor 11 explains that man is the glory of God, woman is the glory of man, and a woman's long hair is her glory. The women who washed Jesus' feet with their hair brought to the lowest of depths their own glory to be used as rags to clean Jesus' feet, covering their glory with dirt from His feet. When we worship God, it is fitting to cover our glory and the glory of man so that only God's glory is exalted.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

5 ай бұрын

@@adriannelea1 So neither woman above was worshipping Jesus? ...because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her... In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God? doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him? and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;... -Young's Literal Translation (YLT) Does even nature itself not teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him, but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her as a covering. -NASB A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. If a fabric covering is actually required, then all references to hair are totally irrelevant to the subject. It only can make sense if the long hair of a woman is the 'covering'. She should be covered, with her long hair. To have short hair, like a man, means that she is basically bald. Therefore uncovered.

@adriannelea1

5 ай бұрын

@@user-iz8np3vv4i You're pulling verses 13-15 out of the context of the full passage. Verses 13-15 is Paul's argument from nature that women should have a covering. If you try to say the hair is the covering Paul is arguing for in the full passage, then verse 6 doesn't make sense. You'd have to interpret it as, "For if a wife [cuts her hair or shaves her head], then she should cut her hair short. But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head." The covering is an actual covering, not just her hair. You should listen to Mike Winger's video on this full passage.

@adriannelea1

5 ай бұрын

@@user-iz8np3vv4i In addition, many in our society still instinctively understands verse 7 as an actual covering, not just hair. It's truly amazing how quickly our instincts in other areas, especially surrounding women, can be distorted after only a generation or two. Deception is real, and Satan is good at it. Just continue to pray about it. God is good.

Thank you! ❤

I’m kinda young and I’ve started veiling during church/reading the Bible. I want to veil properly when I get married

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

Love to hear it ❤️

Thankyou for your video. This is something I too have been studying for quite some time . I always wore my head covering from start to finish in church. But the scriptures clearly say in 1 corinthians 11 v5 and v 13 clearly tells us when God wants us to cover our heads. When praying . Personally I am not praying during the Sunday service, while singing or at the bible study. Since looking into this scriptures really searching the Lords direction in wanting to obey his word I began to only wear my headcovering when praying as the scripture say , to show I am not trying to assert dominance over men, that I am showing my submission when praying audibly. Showing visably the order of creation. The problem for me arose from my fellowship when my sisters began to stare at me and question me over and over why I am not wearing it at all times . One of my sisters said my husband and had rebellious hearts . It has caused alot of disunity on theur part towards me . Tgey are being contentious towards me.This is really affecting my joy as they are becoming very controlling. The bible is very clear when a woman prays cover here head with a covering . If a woman is convicted to wear it all the time that is her choice . We are not to judge our sisters see Romans 14 on judging these matters that are not essential for salvation. People can get so dogmatic over this issue . If anyone is trying to force you to wear a head covering all the time ask them for the chapter and verse . There isn't one .

If you look at the Greek word used for "covering" in verse 11:15, it is different than all the previous instances of "covering" in the chapter. Imho that is further evidence that Paul is saying a cloth cover is required and not that our hair meets that requirement, otherwise why would he not have used the same word? Great video! It's awesome to see women really looking into this and being willing to obey convictions. I cover full time mainly for the practical benefits I've experienced such as men treating me more respectfully and feeling less objectified, greater ability to focus and concentrate, and greater mental clarity with less intrusive or chaotic thoughts.

@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj

7 ай бұрын

“Those who promote a cloth veil as a covering try to use the fact that this word perbolaiou is different than the word katakalupto to prove that it is talking about a “second covering” - the long hair being the first, katakalupto, and the veil being the second, perbolaiou. But, katakalupto is not a noun, and does not mean what veil-promoters say it does. It shows a state of being, and is used as an adverb, say the scholars. Therefore, there are not two nouns - that is, two distinct coverings - being discussed. Rather, a state of being, or condition, is discussed: the man’s head is in a state or condition of being “not hanging-down, covered”, while the woman’s head is in a state of being “hanging-down, covered”. Her hair is given her for a “throw-around” (perbolaiou). In other words, the hanging-down hair serves as a throw-around for her head - she is covered, and meets the examples first put forth: that she pray or prophesy with her long hair hanging down on her head. Since it is a shame for a man to have long hair, he is to pray to God with his head “not hanging-down, covered” -- ouk katakaluptesthai.’ - Bernie Parsons

@alexandrajarmon6559

6 ай бұрын

@@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj thank you! Yes, I actually figured out that the difference was the noun vs. adjective and verb form yesterday. I'm still not sure it meets the requirement since one cannot change hair length back and forth at a whim, and also it seems that would make verse 6 redundant. I also don't see why if that's the way it was understood at the time, women wore head coverings for so long.

@alexandrajarmon6559

6 ай бұрын

@@GodsWordisTruth-zg1jj after further studying the full article where that quotation comes from I'm inclined to disregard it completely. The author states he doesn't know Greek and none of the Greek dictionaries I've looked at give his definition of "hanging down, covered" nor does he cite his source of that definition. I've also not read a single well known, educated pastor or theologian come to the conclusion that the hair was the covering Paul was suggesting to the Corinthian women. That doesn't seem to be good hermeneutics to come to a different interpretation based on Greek, without expertise in Greek. There also is a Greek word for the verb "having long hair" found in verse 11:15 and it seems to me if that's what Paul meant in the preceding verses, that's the word he would have used. I also don't know Greek so I'm inclined to trust the committees of translators and scholars over a layman's conjecture.

I just started seriously covering today. May I ask where you got the scarf you're wearing? I really like it. Ordering some from Amazon but would like a couple of nicer silkier ones

I am trying to figure out if my husband wants this or if he is just being supportive.. but so much more..

Love this! Thanks for your honesty. Where do you find your head coverings?

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

I own two. One I got off of Amazon. And one is from Walmart!

@nicki8869

Жыл бұрын

Garlands of Grace do have beautiful headcoverings of all colors, patterns and styles. God bless

I'm Christian and I'm wearing a hijab today. ❤ also, I got a veil for church. Thank you for this. I feel like God is telling me to be more modest so that's what I'm doing. God bless

I hear you. Enjoyed your video. You just don’t want to get into legalism. You sound very genuine btw. And I love how you aren’t judgemental. But yes, Paul said if it causes contentions there are “no such customs.” (Paraphrased). It was a part of the culture at that time and also was used as an illustration. But I think heart posture is most important. There are people who cover their heads and their hearts aren’t truly submissive. God would probably be more concerned about the heart vs. people seeing a cloth on the outside. I’m just thankful we are under grace and not the law. So if you want to wear it cool. It’s awesome you want to stand for Biblical order in marriage in general.

I agree with you….so should we also be going to church on Saturday as well?

@rebeccahedberg6656

Жыл бұрын

Some churches offer saturday services which I have attended. Regardless, I personally set aside saturday as rest and focus my time on the things of God.

I wear a veil for Mass. I’m in my 30’s and started quite a while ago. : )

Yes love this video !

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

❤️💕

I've recently been convinced of cloth head coverings for women, Dale Patridge's book was very biblical and helpful! Mike Winger's research is great too!

Great video ! God bless !!!

Keep it up with the KZread content please, im loving it 🤌🏿

@lis_daily_

Жыл бұрын

Thank you!!! Will do!

The hair is not the covering. Or men would be commanded to shave their hair. " the hair was given to her for a covering" as in, given to her FOR PUTTING A COVERING ON. The choice of the woman to obey and cover is powerful and impactful because God gives us the option to choose.❤

@FA-God-s-Words-Matter

3 ай бұрын

I have noticed that most head covering promoters misinterpret the beliefs of those who believe that long hair is the covering. In their efforts to show that it doesn’t make sense they will state something like: “If hair were the covering, then men should be shaved bald (aka uncovered) every time they pray.” You’d be surprised at how many times I’ve read this in the comments section of various KZread videos. There are several errors here, the first being that no one is saying that to be uncovered means to be shaved. If a woman is to be covered in long hair and a man is NOT to be covered in long hair, then we are not talking about baldness or being shaved it just means that a man should not have long hair or another way to say the same thing is that he should have SHORT hair. So that is mistake number one. Mistake number two is that what Paul was preaching had to do with some action that requires something to be taken off (or put on). Although it is true that Paul was saying that men ought to be uncovered when praying or prophesying but he wasn’t being exclusive he was just giving a couple of examples. The idea is that a believing man should not have long hair (meaning he should be uncovered) while doing anything holy or godly LIKE praying or prophesying. What? Do you think Paul saying it was ok to be “covered” while preaching, talking in tongues, interpreting tongues, casting out devils, singing to the Lord, worshipping to the Lord, dancing to the Lord, etc. as long as it was not those two exclusive moments? Evidence that he must have been referring to hair is also based on his mentioning of the order of creation between men and women in verses 8 and 9. If Paul is making the effort to include this as a reason why women should be covered, and men uncovered then it must be BEFORE the manufacturing of veils or hats. It also must be BEFORE any idea of church. Therefore, what else could Paul be talking about if not hair way back in the beginning? It had to have been something that existed since then and had to have been natural like hair. The other misconception is that verse 6 doesn’t make sense if one were to believe in long hair as the covering. As one person put it in a comment in a KZread video: “If a woman doesn’t have long hair let her cut her hair? That just doesn’t make sense.” In other words, they are under the impression that one is confused when explaining verse 6 because why would Paul say that one should cut the woman’s hair if it was supposedly already cut? Therefore, this explanation does not make sense as it seems to be repetitive, but this is not being understood correctly. As said before not being covered (aka uncovered) means having short hair but that does not mean that it cannot be cut shorter or shaved off. I have short hair, but neither is it a buzz cut or shaved off bald. Therefore, even though I have short hair it doesn’t mean that it cannot be cut even shorter or shaved bald. So now it is important to understand what shorn and shaven mean. The word “shorn” is the same word used when you shear sheep. A stubble is left behind. And shaven implies using a razor which implies that all the hair would be taken clean off. Note that the word “shorn” is repeated alongside the word “shaven” in the KJV as if to confirm and clarify that Paul is referring has to do with something extreme and that it causes shame. Obviously cutting off an inch of hair is not going to cause shame therefore the meaning implies something more. And since both words imply seeing the scalp he must be referring to baldness. A quick look at any dictionary will show that these words are synonymous. Therefore, by mentioning these words side by side Paul would seem to be emphasizing the fact that women with short hair may as well be made bald. Yet some refuse to see the obvious logic and will claim that it doesn’t mean baldness but just that it simply means cut, brushing aside the fact that it has a capacity of causing shame, but they don’t do the due diligence of research. For example, the SAME word “shorn” is used when Paul makes a vow and cuts off his hair. I don’t think any normal person reading this would assume that Paul took an inch off his hair right? No, it was common back then that when someone was serious about a vow, they would do a serious act like cutting ALL their hair off. There is nowhere to run away from this, shorn just like shaven has to do with baldness. It would also be very difficult to claim that Paul was speaking metaphorically as hair seems to be the main theme here and the removal thereof repeatedly. Why would he repeat the words shaved or shorn unless he was being literal? I think most of us can agree that having short hair (like in a typical male haircut) is NOT the same as having their hair shorn or shaven aka bald. Therefore, a woman being “uncovered” simply means that she has short hair and that in doing so she might as well shave the REST of her hair off. It’s not that complicated once you understand what it means to be covered or uncovered. Everything else starts to make sense when you read the other verses knowing that they are referring to hair. Unfortunately, people tend to get stuck on just a couple of words that vaguely seem like some kind of headwear but do not consider all the verses that show that “covering” means long hair and that “uncovered” means short hair. Therefore, given all this logic and proof, how can we conclude that they are referring to a hat, bonnet, or veil? I reiterate, how can one have logical judgments in the example I gave that by merely looking at a long-haired woman performing such holy acts without a veil one would automatically assume that there is a foreign object missing? It makes no logical sense. Therefore, I implore everyone to set aside any bias and explain to themselves 1st Corinthians 11:13 thoroughly, but I suspect most people will simply ignore it. This, therefore, makes the whole veil interpretation wrong, that it cannot be substantiated and should be rejected.

1 Thessalonians 5:16-17 "pray without ceasing". And, it is for that reason that I chose to wear a covering at all times. I leaned for years towards Messanic Judaism, so to speak. Keeping the annual sabbaths but with no interest in the talmud and such. I stopped covering my head for a time, and resumed with just a partial covering or wide head band. The interpretation of most Jews of course is that women are to cover their heads after marriage. I'm divorced (city hall marriage) and continue covering my head only partially. Although I usually just wear amazon headbands these days, my mom just gifted me a few scarves, and it was very touching. I throw a headhand on every day without thinking about it, and having to wrap a scarf again was a reminder of why I do it. I was looking for videos on half wraps when I came across yours. It's very touching to see other Christian women go through that same journey. To me, it means one takes their faith seriously. ❤

@lis_daily_

8 ай бұрын

Thank you for sharing! I really appreciate it.

I love your video and you’re so pretty! I’ve been very curious about the verse in the Bible where Paul speaks about this. I’ve been feeling led to start wearing head coverings, but I am currently in a relationship and not yet married. Should this only be done once I am under the authority of my husband?

@lis_daily_

8 ай бұрын

I do not know the answer to this! I would do more research, trying looking up more sermons on it or simply pray and follow what you think God is calling you to do. I appreciate your diligence in searching out the truth. 💕

I’m about myself thanks you for the video

@lis_daily_

11 ай бұрын

💕💕

I'm glad and grateful that you mentioned feeling confused about the Scripture passage regarding a cloth covering vs. the woman's hair being the covering itself. I'm an adult Christian convert, and for the last several years I've felt a personal conviction to have a gender-distinct look. I wear skirts nearly all the time, except for palazzo pants sometimes in summer (the dainty-patterned pants that are flared almost skirt-like, which men never wear anyway), and I wear my hair long. The long hair is important to me because of Scripture, and I've wondered about covering it for corporate worship, but the women in my Anglican church don't wear cloth coverings. It's something I'll be thinking about and researching more.

When my life changed first thing I heard in audible voice cover your head … so I started wearing … I cannot write Al but it was very deep conviction . Even people were against me . But I never pay attention but I answer…

@joelgalarza-ce6cz

6 ай бұрын

You were listening to the voices in your Head?! One should be convicted by the Word of God not random thoughts that you imagined were voices. Please seek God for guidance because you are straying from his word.

If you look at the original Greek for “long hair” it was defined as uncut, allowing it to grow long. So if cut, cover. If the woman’s hair is uncut, it is her covering. My own personal belief, not casting stones. ❤

Well explained.

hi, im 17 and was wondering if you have any understanding on the definition of covering because i wear a head covering and have for years but a while back i was told that it could mean to wear a piece of cloth that is not see through or it could also mean to just have a veil that is like a mesh material is a covering too. i wear a veil that is see through and i’m wondering if covering means to create a barrier or to conceal our head?

I’m proud of you for doing what is right, and obeying God’s word, without being frightened by fear like a true child of Sarah. (1 Peter 3:6). I believe that to be in full compliance with 1 Corinthians 11 you should wear a head covering whenever you pray, not just in church. The scripture does not state that this should only be done in church. I encourage you to watch RC Sproul’s “Custom v Principal” lecture, “No Such Custom”’by the Head Covering movement, and Derek Prince’s speech on head coverings to strengthen your belief. I will watch the videos you left in the description. God bless you, Lisa.

Some have taken issue with the fact that the Greek word used for covering in verse 15 (περιβόλαιον) is a different word than the form of the word used for veiling/covering in verses 5-7 and 13 (κατακαλύπτω), the latter of which means "to cover wholly" or "to veil". Moderator of the General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland, John W. Keddie, contended that if simply any hair were the covering Paul was talking about, then verse 6 would read "For if the women have no hair on her head, let her also be shorn", rendering the passage to be nonsensical.

Spot on!

I never thought of it, but lately I’ve thought about it! The irony is that brides wear beautiful veils on their wedding day. It’s connected that if we wear it on our wedding day that we would do the same at church & when worshiping & praying. Plus, I think your hair cover is really pretty. I used to wear scarfs a lot when I was younger in my 20s because I thought it looked pretty. I’m 51. I think it’s a beautiful thing to a classy woman of God. Plus the scar can be very fashionable throw on a pair of big shades with it.

@user-iz8np3vv4i

6 ай бұрын

My intro reply is below. Reply for more if desired. ...because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her... In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God? doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him? and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;... -Young's Literal Translation (YLT) Does even nature itself not teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him, but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her as a covering. -NASB A woman's long hair is the 'covering'. If a fabric covering is actually required, then all references to hair are totally irrelevant to the subject. It only can make sense if the long hair of a woman is the 'covering'. She should be covered, with her long hair. To have short hair, like a man, means that she is basically bald. Therefore uncovered.

@JohnYoder-vi1gj

6 ай бұрын

I don't understand why would you connect the wearing of veils on a wedding day (of which not everyone around the world does) to wanting to wear it to church when worshiping and praying. You seem to be very confused. I assume you are referring to the praying and prophesying part in 1st Corinthians, if so it doesn't say worshiping it says prophesying and even then they were just examples not to be taken exclusively. Now if you are wearing it for esthetics or fashion then that is fine but as long as we don't make it a doctrine because it isn't.

I will also cover.... cause I am balding!