The first 1,000 people to use this link will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare: skl.sh/jamespopsys07211 Thanks as always for watching everyone, I'll do my best to keep the videos coming throughout the next couple of months regardless of my sleeping patterns, or lack of them... :)

@JustinPaulPictures

3 жыл бұрын

We just had our second baby (2 in two years, yikes), so I totally hear you on sleep and venturing afar. Congrats to you both and good luck - it’s an incredible, unprecedented new adventure. Get ready to use that portrait lens/lenses. ;)

Film is not for everyone. It is a complete different process compared to digital. I shoot films (99.9%of my shots) and I wouldn't trade my cameras and my darkroom for the best dslr in the world. But it doesn't prevent me from loving beautiful digital images. In the end, it is all about photography, people do whatever they want to, no one can judge of it is a good or bad thing. People tell me they don't understand why I shoot films, I should enter the modern world and so on... Honestly, I don't care that people find that stupid or don't understand. I'm having so much fun with that, why should I change?

@BARMAXAR

3 жыл бұрын

That's perfect! ❤️

@lensman5762

3 жыл бұрын

I do both. I use both alongside each other, but my main interest is in film. I find digital sterile and boring. I have to be honest and say that for commerce and colour work, the digital process is difficult to beat. When it comes to personal projects , for me the film is still unsurpassed.

@daviehudson4270

3 жыл бұрын

I’m about 70/30 in my film to digital use … film is for work and digital is for playing

@redbank542

3 жыл бұрын

100%

@GutS7u6

3 жыл бұрын

I have recently started with film. I wanted to buy a nice looking old camera, but am a tight git so wanted one that I could use. Anyway, I am enjoying dabbling with film (I am purely a hobby photographer) and it is teaching me more patience and thought with the process. I have also started buying different film cameras to use. I now have a small 110 camera, 2x cheap lomo 35mm cameras, 1x 'proper' Werra 35mm camera and a cheap Holga 120 med format. I have so far used the lomo 35s and the holga...

Film got me back into photography. I used to shoot video for a living in tv news, then stopped picture taking altogether other than digital happy snaps of the kids. Then I pulled out my old OM4 SLR and rediscovered photography. Now I shoot both media, playing with ancient medium format cameras when I feel a need to slow down, and shooting digital for almost all the reason you mention.

My daughter asked to take my old Nikon F3 back to college with her this fall and is using it now. I love that and actually made me think about film again as I help her get familiar with it. She also just found out a friend of hers in Boston only uses his film camera so they'll go out and do some city shots soon enough. Go figure. I love that they are into photography and will probably learn a lot about their likes/dislikes and the how to get the images they like this way. To be honest, I'm so glad there wasn't digital or Lightroom, etc. when I started in 1979. I had so much fun and was really proud of many of my shots as they came out of the camera that I would have gone crazy with all the editing options, people's opinion, etc. I'm glad she can almost go back in time a little and just enjoy the stripped down version of it.

@aaronramos6056

3 жыл бұрын

That's why i shoot on film sometimes too. So i can only focus on the act of taking the picture and norhing else. No lightroom or what ever...

@dimitrijekrstic7567

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaronramos6056 lightroom is an additional option, not a requirement. You can have the same amount of fun and not use lightroom or post on social media. Both of your comments make you seem like you believe everyone is using social media and has to use it. Not really true, is it? It's your choice. You could just as well post your film photos on social media after scanning them, but you aren't doing that, are you? You can choose

@powbobs

2 жыл бұрын

Lots of young people use film cameras. K-pop Idols, especially females, also like using film cameras and that has influence on younger people.

@gerryphilpott9766

2 жыл бұрын

@@powbobs That's true. However, I just got a used film camera that works with my current lenses and am enjoying the experience and "look" again. Digital will be primary of course but film does get you to pay more attention to the process which is never a bad thing.

@powbobs

2 жыл бұрын

@@gerryphilpott9766 Definitely

DSLR feels like a high powered iPhone once you discover the joy of film photography, spray a ton of images from every angle , auto focus , massive files and resolution so you can take a weak composition then repair and re crop in Lightroom . Next you start using preSets , the slippery slope away from being a proper photographer Look at Thomas Heaton , what a great photographer and you tuber , he loves film as it pushes him to be a better at his job , gotta get it right first time , no spray and pray ! Load a hasselblad with film , feel it in your hands as you wind on the film , meter the shot yourself , Develop the film in your kitchen , print it in the darkroom, watch it come to life in the chemicals! It’s awesome

I shoot both because it’s fun! FF in digital and Medium format 6x6 for film. I think large format portraits can’t be replicated in digital at the moment and the look is amazing.

I didn’t start really learning how to wield a camera until I traded out my dads film Canon for a digital. Being able to see what I shot & make adjustments to create what I wanted, with more chances to shoot made my learning curve so much quicker!

@keptkozy

2 жыл бұрын

Similar story - Learned on a digital cam I found in storage at work. Instant feedback helped develop my skills and understanding faster.

@DevI-vl7gp

2 жыл бұрын

Opposite for me! Loved the simplicity of figuring out what exactly the 3 dials did on film, vesus the menus and hundreds of buttons on digital. I actually hated taking photos before I found a film camera in an old work cabinet.

@dimitrijekrstic7567

2 жыл бұрын

@@DevI-vl7gp manual mode would givr you exactly the same experience on a dslr...go with manual focus if you wanna get your retro high, and enjoy having the technology to shoot hundreds of photos on a 32gb card... Made a mistake? You could possibly fix it in lightroom. Wanna know how close you got to the perfect pic? Just preview it right away on your dslr. You lose so much by going to film. I understand the whole material vibe and retro vibe, and the fact that they can often be found quite cheap nowadays, but to say that film is somehow easier to start with is just wrong.

@powbobs

2 жыл бұрын

Quicker doesn’t mean better.

@saramulry

2 жыл бұрын

@@powbobs Unless you know my work and think I’m a bad photographer I’m not sure why you’d feel the need to say that.

As someone who only shoots film, I’m 17 not just an old person who never switched, I agree with this. I mostly do editorial photography and environmental portraits where film is easier. But for landscape film is a very different kettle of fish. I love your style with digital and think your work flow is amazing. It’s nice how people can have so many different approaches to photography and make awesome work, I think that’s what makes it so special.

@zka77

3 жыл бұрын

I can't even begin to think about any situation where film would be easier than or superior to digital. People shoot film for all kinds of irrational reasons and nothing else.

@Ericbjohnston5150

3 жыл бұрын

@@zka77 A film shooter makes a better photographer. A film shooter has to really think the shot. gotta think the settings. A bad shot is wasted film which is wasted money. A digital photographer just shoots willy nilly. Pros not included.

@finleycartmell5223

3 жыл бұрын

@@zka77 that's literally the entire point. And the unique look that film provides is a completely rational reason. Film is imperfect, mistakes get made, but the lack of perfection is what gives the images more feeling and makes them more special. I shoot both film and digital, and as good as digital is, film provides exactly what digital lacks.

@Adrian-wd4rn

3 жыл бұрын

@@zka77 What a dumb take. LOL. A 6x6 negative holds FAR more resolution than a puny little 35mm dslr can produce. Digital medium formats are just beginning to catch up to the resolution of film. And that's only considering resolution, not color accuracy and overall detail capture.

@nemrody7828

3 жыл бұрын

@@zka77 - lower ISO options (for the more experimental) - bigger resolution on medium format and large format - forces the photographer to really think about what he is shooting, and how he does it Also, you don't need to insult everyone you disagree with. Makes for bad credibility.

Shooting film is super neat, but so much of the content around it romanticizes the process without being clear to newbies that this is not the route to go if you're just getting into photography. If you're just starting out, I cannot imagine how frustrating the lack of instant feedback could be. Seeing your mistakes in real time is one of the greatest benefits of shooting digital. If you're just starting out, ignore the hipsters and get you a moderately priced (maybe used) APS-C camera, a light room subscription and go. If you're still super into it in like 6 months, sink some real money into it. Also, totally thought you were just joking about the ponies. Put a smile on my face. Congrats on the little one!

I was expecting to hear a trashing of film photography, but this was a well thought out answer as to why you might want to shoot film, and why you might not. Great video, love your work!

Fair enough, though I will say that any photographer deserves the experience at least once of seeing their shot on a piece of slide film. As a landscape photographer in particular, because the way slide film renders natural light is absolutely out of this world and totally incomparable to anything you can experience digitally.

@ytuberization

2 жыл бұрын

Couldn’t agree more. A good slide film image on a light table is unsurpassed by any digital medium…colors of Provia, Ektachrome and Velvia are outstanding compared to Bayer sensor output

James 1 year later with a fully baked baby: "Why Film Photography is the Photographer's Ultimate Legacy" "(And by fully baked I mean that it's been born and living for a while not baked in a oven. OH a sheep!)"

I switched back to film because I shoot almost all black and white and was tired of making digital edits to mimic film. I like the way film looks and how film cameras feel. to each their own though

I would never shoot film for paid work, largely for the exact reasons you listed: I like having a large pool of shoots to choose from, I like being able to fine-tune the edits, and everything needs to be backed up. But I love film for small personal projects. It does force me to slow down and think more, and since I develop and scan my own shots, I do feel more of a connection to the work. The great thing about photography is that there's no right or wrong way to do it, only different tools for different people. Best of luck with the baby!

Can you be a hipster at 70? Dumped digital for a Zorki that is even older. The both of us are enjoying our golden years.

@AndersBjornTH

3 жыл бұрын

@Lawrie Conole Mine is a Zorki 1 that I ordered from Ukraine. It was delivered in excellent condition to Northwest Thailand in less than a month. I also bought a Fed 2. Next on my list is a Zorki 4 or maybe a Kiev 4a. Photos of my two cameras are posted on my IG @andrew_mhs Cheers!

@EstelonAgarwaen

3 жыл бұрын

As Long as you have fun taking photos, does it matter?

"...because she's never given birth Look! Squirrel!" I swear, I thought that's what you were doing, because, well, you know... I did not expect real ponies.

I would never expect someone like you (as in a pro photographer) to shoot film most of the time. But it might be fun to get a film camera just to mess with.

Great thing about youtube - I have no desire to go back to using film but I sure do enjoy watching other people doing it. Those videos are enough to keep the spark at bay for me and just appreciate the dedication film photographers have in the art. :)

It was nice to hear someone giving considered reasons as to why a particular format wasn't for them rather than walking out the same old clichés about hipsters or dad bods.

I totally agree with your logic about film. I’m the same, when I started « photography » when I was a kid it was on film, but I sucked too much to get any return on my work! Digital allowed me to get -marginally- better. I also sympathise with your O - ooh a pony!! :D

Congrats on the baby! My wife and I had our first in January, it's a joy. Things get really neat at the 5 to 6 month mark, lots of new emotions and laughs.

As someone who shoots film and digital, I appreciate that there are those who only shoot with one or the other. Sometimes I like to see people shoot film, and sometimes I like to see people shoot digital.

..."look ponys"!! Ha! LOL So funny, thought you were tactically deviating. Then stunning pony's show up. They look truly majestic in the mountain setting. Big step up from sheep too.

I agree with the idea that having constraints can help you improve and or force you to get more creative. I don't shoot film much these days; perhaps only 2 or 3 rolls a year but I find having my iso locked in and dealing with issues around having to keep shutter speeds relatively fast means I have to work out ways to get shots that are easy with digital but tricky with film. It helps me to think about lighting and composition in particular in a more detailed way. Plus knowing you're having to pay for every shot certainly focuses the mind. As for editing, I'm not a fan unfortunately, so I like to make my decisions in terms of the look of my photos beforehand as much as possible, which film also lets me do....well, forces me to do. Edit: typos (there are probably more)

@johnyutzey6504

3 жыл бұрын

My sentiments as well. I could have written this with two modifications: I shoot maybe 6-8 rolls per year, and I do edit my photos (including scanned film shots), but with a light touch -- nothing heavy. Like you, I try to get my shots as good as I can SOOC.

I started my photography journey with film, when digital was already a thing, because getting started was considerably cheaper (a Nikon F70 costed me 1/10 of a D60). Since then, I already moved intop digital realm, but the leasons lerned from film still stick to me. Whenever I take a photo of something, I only take 1 or 2, because I already know what am I looking for. And I never take those "just in case", because I already know what am I doing. Which doesn't guarantee I'm getting a good photo (most of the time, it's not), just that the end result is going to be what I was trying to achieve in that moment

"2 more weeks to be fully cooked" ? Is that how you talk about your baby? 😂😂😂 I wish you both the best, and that it all goes well with the baby. Nice video, by the way. Cheers!

Shooting (35mm) film is a bit nostalgic for me. I found copies of the slr cameras I used to own. Clicking the shutter after finding and framing a composition is oddly satisfying. Hunting for old lens bargains is a pastime on it's own. But to each their own😉

I shoot a mix of film and digital because I like the variety of experiences to keep me from getting bored. This is especially important where I live during the winter months because the terrain is a bit blah until Spring comes, and it is a rural area, so street photos are a bit bland as well. Anyway, we all have our reasons, and it is all about getting out and having fun regardless of the medium.

The thing I don't get is the editing, both digital and film shooters. That's why I love instant photography, instant tangible photos and no editing. Love what comes out of it the way it is, that's the charm of it!

Along a similar vein “will I ever purchase a mirrorless camera?”… I purchased my D700 because I liked the size and it fits my hands… I didn’t purchase a Canon as I didn’t like the ergonomics (button placement) by comparison with Nikon… I tried a Fujifilm mirrorless briefly, it’s too small for my hands, just like the Nikon Z series. Someday camera manufacturers will realize their customer base didn’t shrink like they said in the movie… I do own a film camera, it belonged to my dad. Vintage 1953 Contaflex. I keep it for sentimental reasons… Yes James, I too shoot from here, and then there. And maybe once again in that other spot 😁 I enjoyed the trip with you, stay safe.

Well, with regards to the number of images on a film versus digital; one could just load up a low capacity SD card..say 5gb or whatever size will give you, say 20 to 30 images on you particular camera. That will certainly limit the number of images one could take. If you normally take 2 rolls of film on a shoot, just take 2 low capacity SD cards. Same thing. Or, one could just revert to basics and think about one's digital image before pressing the shutter. I use a MF digital, and very, very seldom "shoot from the hip". Thought and composition and planning is key, as it always was. I usually take a maximum of 2 digital images per scene/scenario etc. Works for me. Nice video. Best wishes David in the UK.

While I think your points are fantastic and completely valid! But I do think because of your concerns and reasons why you wouldn't is exactly why you should! Even if it's for a single day trip to go out and have a bit of fun. I mostly shoot digital but I do own a huge collection of film cameras that I do enjoy to just change things up every now and then. I tend to see it as, when I'm going to try and get actually good photos that I plan to use I will always take digital. When I just want to have fun and appreciate photography for what it is and I'm completely fine without getting any decent shots because the actual experience is such a difference that it's just fun, in of itself! Up to you man, but I think it could be fun for you to just give it a go!

I started shooting film in 1976. Even with a digital camera, I can't seem to shake the old habits of attempting to think every shot completely through before releasing the shutter. I know I miss a LOT of good shots because of this. Change is hard.

Love those shots you got with the river in the foreground

Shooting film is a different philosophy and discipline to the digital world of instant gratification and shoot 100 frame maybe one fits the bill. It is not for everyone, in fact it is only for the few who are dedicated to the process. I do shoot digital as well as film ( for the past 45 years ), and the digital results are good, but different to film. And if I may say so and with all due respect to everyone, very few people raised in the digital era have the technical knowledge to make good use of film. Many do not even have the basic knowledge of the relationship between the quantity of light, the quality of light, the response curve of the film and its relationship to the desired exposure value, let alone the effect of different developers and developing techniques in the case of BW film. With film every exposure counts or otherwise it will cost you a lot of money and time. I admire your honesty in declaring your disinterest in analogue photography, as opposed to a lot of others who have just jumped on the bandwagon of film photography as a badge of honour and, me too I know what I am doing.

We realised recently that we can easily go up to Ogwen after work for a walk - what a treat to have it so close! All the best on the baby front mate.

Love it James on a Saturday

For me I do a hit of both, I have always shot digital but as the last couple of years have gone I got swayed to somewhat downgrading to a 5d classic. Being more closer to the film style I fell back in love with photography and have now started hiking and gone for only film at the time being. A zenit 12xp that my partner picked up for £13 and then I'm just using the cheapest film I can and really enjoying the wait of seeing if everything I took has turned out as I hoped! Just been reccomend the channel and definitely going to subscribe to keep up! 👍

The editing capability is the big one for me! Another great video man

Loved the Pony bonus - just beautiful in a stunning scene

After many years of shooting film I moved over to digital in 2004 and there is no way I would return to film. Too much can go wrong. Also, the pain of having magazines returning your precious transparencies covered in scratches, or finger prints, or even losing them completely, is always there. Anyway, the cost is prohibitive when compared with digital. Technology has moved on. Sadly digital has meant that photography is not appreciated in the way that it was and is not rewarded financially. Gone are the days when you could enjoy a good living from providing images to photo libraries or even getting sent to exotic locations on commission.

@Adrian-wd4rn

3 жыл бұрын

cost? Good digital camera worth its salt = 2-3k. Good lens worth its salt, 600-2k. My bronica? 360 bucks. I have years worth of film to burn before I even get close to touching the cost of a digital body, decades if you factor body and lens, and batteries and memory cards., which still can't match the resolution.

When I started with photography, film was the mass media, it's what everyone shot in the 80s and most of the 90s, so it's stayed with me as a format to this day. That being said, however, it would be financial suicide to shoot film in my genre (conflict/war photojournalism), because every other photographer would have his or her images on the desks of editors before my rolls of film were even in a patterson tank. Digital for work, and film for occasional personal projects for me. I agree with you completely, although I do shoot film still.

I drove 1200 miles to shoot a video…. And got home to find my audio completely failed. I feel this.

My reasons why I don't want shoot film anymore are somewhat different (but also similar in some ways). I am 1971 so when I started with photography as 10 yrs old the only way was chemical process and I know it very well (moreover, I am chemist, so I got even more intimate knowledge). Nowadays, shooting (and processing) film can be very expensive hobby when compared to late 80s/early 90s. Even getting equipment is much harder. So I am not quite convinced about quality for price issue. Then there is the learning process. Too much ways for "techno"onanism (chemoonanism?) with developers etc. which in most cases only distracts from photography as such. There are problems with longevity of the shots - both negatives and positives, especially when beginner really don't have a clue what is important (silver is not that stable in the presence of fixer remains). There is environmental cost (almost all developing agents are toxic and cancerogenic) and of course it is resource hungry, too (silver crisis in the 80s). After buying my first digital compact camera (3 Mpix Oly Camedia) I never used my 35 mm compact camera (Oly mju:1) and I rarely used my 35 mm SLRs (Pentax and Nikon). After buying my first dSLR I completely ditched all my film equipment and gladly never looked back. (And as a bonus I have zero problems using old Pentax lenses with K10 or K3ii.) However, you can obtain RAW files from (some) scanners, VueScan is able to save DNG if the scanner supports sending raw data.

I have a dslr bought used approx. 2 yrs ago, which I could never afford back in the day when it was new. I used a rangefinder Minolta basic cam from 1973 into the 90s. Took lots of college and friends pics years ago. Good pics, I enjoyed using it outdoor and indoors with tiny 'strobe'. Now it's Nikon FX and DX. Keeper rate is lower than with old Minolta Hi Matic! The Nikon F100 is akin to their DSLRs in many ways. But not serving a practical purpose; I don't want to make room for the non-digital media! So I've only shot a few rolls. Pristine body, perhaps will hold some value for resale in the future.

Nice to see a photo of water that is not a long exposer.

you're always entertaining and not least, inpirational!

I was brought up on film processed and printed my own mono stuff bought my first dig in 03 loved and still love it I use it all day every day in my job as a newspaper photographer it’s essential I never got rid of my film gear though and over last year or two I’ve gone back to film more and more for personal projects for me it’s a complete chill out after the urgency of my day job I love the feel and sound of a mechanical film camera I still process my own film but don’t have the space at this time for printing that being said once retired I aim to kit out a darkroom. It’s all down to enjoyment I enjoy both mediums equally for different reasons. There’s no right or wrong imho. Great video James lovely location 📷❤️📷

That image at 9:34 is just stunning!! I understand how you feel about film, I would have the same issue with it. I also like to maybe take 10 (or more) almost the same pictures with just minor changes to them, and also storage would concern me.

I really enjoyed the sound of the streams you encountered. Including the falls.

Your music choice is soooo dope!

I would love to still shoot film. The old SLR cameras were gorgeous. But I feel like a photocopier/Xerox operator with digital cameras. We unfortunately cannot easily develop film anymore.

I shot medium format film for years and scanned the negatives. I agree with all your reasons plus digital has better dynamic range. I will never go back to film.

That last photo with the ponies looks great I would be well happy with it . As for Film ............ I look at it like Antiques stick em in a museum to show how we got to where we got and forget them.. I remember my Minolta 35mm I thought it was great take 36 photos wait 2 days to find out that nothing turned out like you thought it would .. but is was a good turning curve. I like the live display EVA with the histogram and all and no more waiting to find out they aren't any good I can see that straight away LOL

I agree, film is not for me for very similar reasons. I guess the best description of how I shoot is serendipity and spray. If something, anything really, looks interesting it gets photographed at many compositions both vertical and horizontal. I also want to know I got a shot. Goes with my fears of missing out and failing quite nicely. As for cost, I went to New Zealand in 1993 with 36 rolls of 36 exposure slide film at 100, 200 and 400 speeds. With development, it cost me about $900 as I recall. Digital just feels greener to me too. Finally, I enjoy the process of finding images. Adding angst with unnecessary limitations wouldn't help me enjoy the experience I've grown to love.

I went from large format film photography to digital for them purpose of weight and actually, cost. Film can be expensive depending on what format you shoot. I do miss the tactile feel of my field camera, loading the film and composing the shots, but I don’t miss dragging it around with giant tripod and all the holders. Some day, I will return to it, but I am enjoying the same kind of freedoms that you described in this video. Good luck with your new baby when it come James.

Happily left film photography behind many years ago, not looking back… But looking at thousands of slides and negatives not yet scanned to be made usable again.

The ponies definitely were icing on the cake. They made it. You got your allotted photos. 👍 Loved the rest of your video, too, though.

I haven’t shot film in a while but I’m thinking about giving it a shot just for the “surprise” factor when you develop the film and find out if it’s a keeper or trash lol. Ps. I found your photos pretty good on this video actually. PS2: now my kid wants a pony!!! Nice job James!!!!!

@SeeSawMassacre

3 жыл бұрын

I pretty much only shoot film now, and that's one of the main reasons why. I like the unpredictable qualities of film- it seems to have a certain magic to it and i can never fully imagine what it's going to look like until i develop the roll. It also has a realness to it that i don't get from digital, and it seems to capture feeling more accurately to me. And digital is just too easy. Convenience can devalue things make them less special.

@christheking1

3 жыл бұрын

@@SeeSawMassacre I agree. I think shooting film I will probably slow down and take my time as I evaluate all the aspect of my photography since it’s almost a one time deal for each shot. Maybe it’s what I need to take the next step. I already dusted off my old Olympus OM-10 between these two comments.

@SeeSawMassacre

3 жыл бұрын

@@christheking1 Nice. Yeah, i just ask myself, "does this shot have a chance of being a good picture" before i take it. If the answer is maybe or better, i go ahead. I like the pace of shooting film; i find it relaxing. It definitely slowed me down and made me learn a lot. And i just think it's cool, so it keeps me interested and open to taking good pictures.

I can't trade the Sony ecosystem. My a7Riv for photos, my a7Siii for video, my Xperia Pro for streaming footage. People can say film looks great but I have no love for analog work

I learned to shoot on film, because I was too poor to go digital. I miss how easy film was compared to digital, which is weird to say. Like, the little light meter told me my shot was perfectly exposed, but now there's 50 things all over my viewfinder. Histograms, memory, exposure stops, shutter speed, ISO, aperature, battery, autofocus, ratio, etc. Just give me back my little bouncing circle so I can just twist a dial and get it into place. I actually bought an XT-3 just to have my dials back, because I cannot be arsed to go into menus. Hell, I even bought lens adaptors from FD to XF because I'd rather pick up a $10 lens at goodwill than shell out $3,000 for something that gives me OIS and autofocus, which I don't even use. If there are HUD mods for digital cams, I'd love to hear about them.

Amazing scenery, now I want to go to Wales... By the way I also am using the G9 and I absolutely love it!

Regarding the points about manipulating film scans, try scanning using your lumix s5, you don't even need an expensive lens, something like the canon 50mm f3.5 is good enough if you stop down to f5.6 or f8, and you get all of the benefits of a digital raw files when manipulating in post, with insane dynamic range compared to the lab scanners, not to mention the high res mode allowing for 96mp raw scans!

As a fairly young man (in college) who has been shooting casually since high school on my dad's 15-year-old Nikon D50, I spent a few years just fiddling around with settings and hoping things came out right. This year, I got a film camera to force myself to really learn how the settings interact and judge exposures. After just 2 rolls, I think it's done wonders to help me understand what needs to be done. Now when I shoot digital, I can get the pictures I want more easily. In the future, I think I'd like to continue using both, because I find the challenge greatly rewarding and I like the look of film. There are pros and cons to either, and I enjoy both for different reasons. And after researching DSLR's for upgrading (the D50 is a potato by today's standards), I can definitely say film has a much lower bar to entry, but the recurring costs can raise the price quickly. You can get a decent film camera for under $100 (I found a Minolta X-370 and an extra 80-200mm lens at a thrift store for $10 each), but I found that rolls of film cost at least $5 each and development/scanning (via sending to a lab) usually costs upwards of $10 a roll.

I do both, digital and film. Really enjoy shooting film for the manual controls and on top I learned much about light and composition. Also, I started to develop film myself. The biggest drawback for me is the scanning/digitalization process. This is very tedious.

Would be nice to hear at least one person talking about the fact that film photography pollutes, a lot!

I came back to this subject. Film, your point is right on. I do both. Medium format film, outstanding images. Digital 4/3’s compact easier to use. Long ago motor drive was invented for 35mm film cameras allowed the photographer to shoot a roll of Kodachrome in 30 seconds. Same as digital? Not quite. Back then film was cheap, processing was inexpensive (mostly). Digital? 2 megapixels?

Awesome!

Biggest difference with film is INTENT. And fear. The concentration needed to make sure you get the exposure right and the way you have to truly learn about light simply makes you a better photographer. The fear that it will not come out as you planned keeps you sharp. wouldphotographer

@joe2snj

2 жыл бұрын

I hear that from a quite a few film photographers but its simply not true. What makes anyone better at anything is doing said activity over and over again on a regular basis and having the freedom to experiment, make mistakes with immediate feedback. My photography has improved because I shoot digital and have the flexibility of taking different versions of the same frame and each of those frames can and often do teach me something. I still pay attention to light as all good photographers do no matter the medium they shoot in. Maybe you channel your fear to get the best out of your photography but I and many others don't, film or digital shooters.

I just got back from a weekend hiking around Snowdonia. It's such a fantastic place to photograph. Making landscape videos in the rain isn't much fun though!

I respect your opinion, and people should shoot what’s right for them. Film is just another paintbrush. For anyone interested in film - you could solve both problems by just paying for developing and scanning film yourself. Especially since you have a digital camera already. To develop only at a lab (or doing it yourself) is cheap; around $6/roll for lab and ~$1 diy. Digitizing with your camera is simple enough, and you don’t need an expensive one. It does take time to set it up correctly, but once you do it’s essentially giving you a “digital raw file” with all the flexibility. It’s cheaper, and allows you to keep regular film costs low. For less than the half the cost of a new sony, Panasonic, canon, etc. anyone can be shooting on a 6x7 medium format sensor with amazing lenses. By the time you shoot ~$1000 worth of film two new sony bodies would have been announced 🤷 Even just to play around with, I think it’s a fun way to stay in the moment and challenge yourself. I selfishly want more people to shoot it so more 1hr photo services come back 🥺

Chaotic and brilliant as usual, totally Jealous that you now live there! thanks for your thoughts on film, I will one day try it (again) now that I have learned what I am doing! see you soon best wishes to both of you for the Birth.

love your video James, keep up coming. But i do gotta ask, why does almost all your thumbnail have a picture of you scrunching your face haha

I was there on Friday, well not quite as I couldn’t bloody park, luckily I’m only 25 minutes away but I love Ogwen Valley

, an announcement that you will never take a certain path or technique is a bold one. I made a similar one ten years ago that I would never need to shoot film again, roll on ten years and the fact I have to use the same format, lenses and lenses (basically one system), it started to get very boring. Not to say that any of those things are of paramount importance but having them there as a choice ie 35mm roll film or LF revitalises and opens up new avenues for projects and creative direction.

I'm the same type of shooter as you but I enjoy film for photos on the go or photos I don't mind being optimal. It also give a classic look to modern things and kind of trick your mind to search for vintage or retro looking stuff to shoot.

Loved the ponies rambling through the landscape!

As a mostly film shooter (but now have an a7r3) im not sure i agree with all your comments...maybe just your point about editing. I find so many people shoot digital because its easy, there is no learning curve, and they can edit and make their images into what they want, rather than use a film stock for that subject, light etc and take the image when conditions are right. As for taking many images, as a photographer you should know where the best image is, or as part of the forever learning curve that is photography, you learn to SEE, not see once i get back into lightroom lol There is no patience these days with many people with a lot of things, and this again is why people shoot digital. ITs an age of INSTANT. Film photography isnt. Its a discipline and takes real dedication. I think you should shoot it and shoot it a lot. It will make you better. Most shots people take on digital they never use, they shoot because they can.

You wouldn't shoot film and digital the same way, though. That's the point. Having loads of images after a shoot is exactly what put me off digital. Film forces you to slow down and think more, consider more, ask yourself more questions about your goal. For that reason, also, I think I great film photograph is much more valuable to me; they're usually captured with more purpose if that makes sense. I always reach for digital in low-light conditions or when I need to just get some shots (think a high-school graduation or some kind of similar event), but film has given me so much more joy than digital over the years. HOWEVER, it's entirely subjective. I love lots of digital images. Yours are lovely, btw! Still, it needs to be said and understood that the approach to shooting is not an apples-to-apples comparison.

I shot film for about 35 years . Went Digital in 2001. By 2012 I had cameras that were “good enough” …. Never looked back.

Film vs Digital? DIGITAL! I have been making photos for nearly 50 years and have made a lot of film photos that I like very much, however I have no desire whatsoever to go back.

The beauty of using film is that if somebody asks you to delete an image you've taken of them, you can say 'Nope, it has no delete button'.

I think the reasons why people love film so much are the same reasons why I've still never bought a digital camera. Not saying I never will, it's just the analogue methods of how humans interact with nature is what I find fascinating, and is what's gotten me into photography, and I love capturing life on that medium. Lol i was just wondering; Is it strange to *only* shoot film yet enjoy all the videos of yours i've watched 😂

Interesting vid. I shoot both with a Mamiya 7ii 6x7 film camera and a Sony full frame mirrorless. I find it almost impossible to use both at the same time, they are such different disciplines and propositions so if going out for the day tend to pack one or the other. As time goes by I tend to use the Sony more than the Mamiya. As James mentions the post processing of digital gives you a huge amount of flexibility plus access to such a wide variety of different lenses. But the Mamiya is so much fun to just wander around with and the Mamiya lenses are beautiful, plus it gives me the excuse to get out the developing tank out and process my own big fat medium format B&W negs which is always a thrill. Amazingly the Mamiya has nearly tripled in value since I bought it 7 or 8 years ago but I'm not sure that I'd ever be tempted to part with it.

When you were photographing near the wee bridge, I thought an interesting picture would be use the bridge and stream as a frame for a photo of the mountains. Well, when next in Wales.... Thanks for the video and hope you three are well.

I love film myself, but I do understand why it’s not for everyone. But remember, every medium is just another tool to get the final result.

I started out in film 30 years ago and now shoot both in Full Frame and Medium Format. Both formats are the means to an end. The best part is the journey.

Never thought I'd hear you that James. Film is in a renaissance, using a 35mm (or other format) is a test of your skill as a photographer. Digital is OK, but has become too expensive for of us, being beyond my reach, I have a Canon 200D. But I have a few really really good 35mm Canon cameras, which I just love using. Digital has become sterile expensive, and well, boring. There are more of us that are not so called professional photographers, we cannot afford to buy these high end machines or their lenses. Film Photography is a totally different animal, and I think if you tried it you may surprise yourself, rant over. Love your channel by the way. Regards Rob.

I would not have gotten back into photography if film were the only option. I need the instant gratification and the ability to spray and spray.

I am just the same about losing stuff. But I do journal. Also, I was just talking to a friend who ran a studio back in the day with a Mamiya RB67; those images look so good.

Digital is technically better and it has all the advantages. Still, I can’t stop shooting film!

Shoot film scan negative and edit.

I can't say that I missed shooting film. I started shooting film back in the 1970s when I was a kid and continued into the 1980s as an adult from there. My last old film camera was an old Canon manual 35mm film camera. It had a very basic "light metering system" that helped you set up the shot, kind of. It was not a TTL metering system, it was external and gave an indication as to the aperture and shutter speed and how they interacted. I learnt a lot. I also learnt that while I can shoot in manual mode competently on my DSLRs, I'd rather shoot in a semi-auto mode most of the time. I usually shoot in aperture mode when bush walking with a zoom lens for bird/animal shots. Yeah, sure, I can and do shoot in manual mode for long exposure shots through an ND filter/or not. But that takes practice for shots longer than 30 seconds. Night or day.

Take a digital camera photo, print it out. Take a picture of the print with a film camera. Use whatever film you want. Now you've got a film version too. (yes I realize this is a silly idea)

I agree about the editing. I really enjoy it. Just as I enjoyed the darkroom from years past, but I do very much love the digital world. Also James, I agree about handwritten notes AND redundancy.... so I take hand written notes on MS Onenote via a stylus and tablet. Try it out!. 👍

I'm no videographer either! However, my job means I do a bit of stills and video. I can knock together a decent short corporate vid, but need to up skill in PremerPro and AfterEffects. Fun learning though! Love your KZread stuff by the way :)

I have an old Canon T70 in the cupboard that would be fun to dust off, but honestly I can do without the cost of film and developing. And I remember the old days of shooting off a roll, being all excited to pick up the developed photos, only to pull a sad face when I see that most of the photos were rubbish. With digital I'm getting all my rubbish shots for free, which is nice. Also, lovely cameo from the ponies!

The Saturday feng shui has re-aligned. ☕👍 🥂

The whole film/digital debate is kind of pointless. Make pictures if you enjoy making pictures, how you get to it doesn't matter. I shoot both, it just depends on what I want to do. I enjoy the old feel of using mechanical equipment with my Nikon F3. I like the ease and quickness of my D600. Best of both worlds is my Nikon F100. Usually now, if I am doing color photography, I use digital. For anything I want in black and white, it's film all the way.

I see your point about film vs. digital. I think any photographer should have at least some experience with film to have a better understanding of both. After that, it's just a matter of preference and what you want to achieve with your photography (some images can be done only with film, others only with digital; and no, emulating certain aspects of film, say done on 4x5, is not the same). Myself, I'm "oscillating" between both (with a bias towards film).