Actually the end of the video is wrong. The last heir of the Umayyads run away, he took control of Iberia and became caliph of Al-Andalus.

@TruthSeeker8834

7 күн бұрын

No,, Abd-al-Rahman I became Emir of "Emirate of Cordoba". Abd-al-Rahman III is the one became caliph

@samiman5606

7 күн бұрын

Wrong he became the Amir of Cordoba not the caliph because the only caliph is "the Abbasid caliph abi alabas The butsher"

@ghostd69

7 күн бұрын

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@ShishirIIAnirban

7 күн бұрын

I know the story , it' was like a thriller movie

@narrowistheway77

6 күн бұрын

It’s all propaganda fake history anyways, that’s all Islam is, the Abassids created Islam, there’s no historical evidence or record for it before the Abassids

If Caliph Suleiman ibn Abd al-Malik did not desire to fulfill the prophecy by becoming the blessed Muslim commander who will seized Constantinople for Islam according to the prophecy of the Prophet, the Umayyad Caliphate could have saved a lot of money and the rebellion against them might be averted.

@MasteIsIllmatic

7 күн бұрын

The prophet is mostly wrong so they probably didn’t really believe it. That’s why the Umayyads caliphate only lasted a mere 100 years, it was them that organized Islam and the Quran(fixed some of the lies and added more lies)

@History_Teller1250

6 күн бұрын

​@@MasteIsIllmaticYet another conspiracy theorist...🤦‍♂️

@user-mp4cn7or3z

6 күн бұрын

​@@History_Teller1250 No he isn't! There is no conspiracy theory in his words.

@user-fl5mq9kp7g

6 күн бұрын

The Awaited Mahdi: What in God’s name? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@-basharal-essa9513

3 күн бұрын

I am Syrian, may God have mercy on our ancestors Hisham bin Abdul Malik, Abdul Rahman Al-Dakhel, Muslima bin Abdul Malik, and many grandparents 💔🇸🇾

1. Abbasid superiority 2. Catastrophic defeats from the romans 3. Revolts everywhere

@ibrahimmustafa2481

7 күн бұрын

Do you mean after they conquered half the roman Empire and all of Persia 😂

@shadowgod1797

7 күн бұрын

@@ibrahimmustafa2481 oh boy here comes rhe copium from arabs lol

@williamrobert9898

7 күн бұрын

@@shadowgod1797 Sounds like you are still trying to cope from the fact that Muslims owned the romans and ended them for good lol

@MCAbdo

7 күн бұрын

@@shadowgod1797 no it's true tho

@starbreeze7249

6 күн бұрын

@@ibrahimmustafa2481 that doesn't make their comment any less factual, so what's your point exactly? you can conquer half of a country, then still lose key battles to said country that cause another country to wipe yours out because of those battles. unless you're trying to brag about one point in history, to which my question would be.. how'd that work out for you today?

One thousand three hundred years have passed, and the Umayyads have gone with it, but still some losers blame them for their modern-day failures, what a great empire!

@ALIKN1-1

4 күн бұрын

Ummayad weren’t great neither good they were mfs trash rulers

@U.K.N

2 күн бұрын

But losers do you mean us shiites ? Also which failures ? We aren’t failing in the current day , not in the slightest . We blame muawiya for and yazid for every bad thing today for preventing the rule of the imams ( and therefore would have established the messianic nation back then )

@Amen6magi

13 сағат бұрын

The loser?your means the grandson of Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, who was defeated by the Umayyads Sunni muslim☕️

The native berbers of morocco defeated three umayyads army one after one after one after one and you didn't put that in the video specially the berbers of North Africa fight against umayyad caliphate army's for over 70 years non stop in the end the umayyads lost Morocco and Algeria and after 7 years of this the umayyad caliphate get destroyed by the new super power the Abbasid caliphate (non Arabs Persians)

@ghostd69

7 күн бұрын

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@ghostd69

7 күн бұрын

Berber never fought umayyad for 70 years old it was just some battles and berber revolt was eventually crushed in battle al asnam and al qarn, algeria was remain under umayyad and people of tanger in morcco pledge of allegiance to handela ibn safwan who crushed berber revolt in battle al asnam in chlef modern algeria

@crzahmed9707

7 күн бұрын

Abbasids were Arabs bruh, they were descendants of uncle Abbas of prophet Muhammad,but tolerant towards non-arabs

@zakback9937

7 күн бұрын

"of Morocco"

@zakback9937

7 күн бұрын

@@ghostd69 handled bent safwan barely only partially maintained the rebellion and within years Sufrites of Warfjuma took over Kairouan deleting out the quraish family. At best Eastern Algeria had remained under their rule for a bit.

why don't you also mention millions of Zoroastrians that were in Iran under Umayyads?

@user-hv2jb1zq1r

7 күн бұрын

So True

@Thefendi-

7 күн бұрын

Most of them converted to Islam and became Muslims; a minority still live in Iran in the city of Yazd, mostly and some went to India

@westsidermetalhead4997

7 күн бұрын

Because this channel is a bit biased. Cherry picking information sometimes instead of the whole picture. Didn't say, mention anything about the help Constantinople received by Khan Tervel and the Bulgarian army who cleared the fields infront of the walls.

@Faisal-pb5gu

7 күн бұрын

@@Thefendi- Iran did not become a Muslim majority until during Seljuk rule

@ghostd69

7 күн бұрын

​@@westsidermetalhead4997 Trevel khan and his blugars army did nothing important but rather than attacking an retreated army during their withdrawl and the army were suffering dieases and hungry and cold weather and greek fire playing big role destroying major army

Abu al-Abbas al-Saffah is one of the figures who formed the original institution that had an impact on the Islamic world. He is the one who organized this revolution that became known as the Black Flags Revolution. He was given a nickname by this name, al-Saffah, because of the large amount of blood he shed.

@mmz5844

5 күн бұрын

Persian abumuslim killed six hundred thousand Arabs.

@ghostd69

2 күн бұрын

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@mmz5844

2 күн бұрын

@@ghostd69 but he killed six hundred thousand Arabs.

10:09So are you telling me that the Berbers, the Spaniards, the Persians, the Egyptians, the Kurds and the Syrians were 10% of the population?😅

@trapster1483

5 күн бұрын

thats what im saying

@1sultan189

Күн бұрын

Arabs were a minority ruling over a overwhelmingly non Arab population

Really awesome Video! I have one bit of constructive criticism tho: could you please link your sources in the description in the future? I would love to read more about the topic and it would really install confidence in the truthfullness of you guys' Videos ^^

@ghostd69

7 күн бұрын

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@StutteringStupidity

7 күн бұрын

@@ghostd69 yk how someone could proofread the video more easily? By seeing the sources given

@trapster1483

5 күн бұрын

@@ghostd69 anyone can edit on wikipedia

هناك العديد من الاخطاء مثل ان الخلافة يجب ان تكون لشخص ينحدر من نسب مباشرة فلم يكن ابو بكر و لا عمر و لا عثمان يعتبروا ممن ينحدر حتى معاوية من ناحية النسب اقرب للنبي من عمر و ابو بكر ايضا معاوية لم تحدث في عهده الكثير من الاضطرابات و اذا حدثت فكان يتعامل معها باللين حتى انه كان مضرب المثل بالصبر و الحلم على من يظلمونه اما القمع بعنف و وحشية حدثت في عهد عبدالملك بن مروان و ابنه الوليد طبعا الكثير من الاخطاء الاخرى لكنها كثيرة ،ارجو ان يؤخذ ما اقوله و ان تاخذ من المصادر الصحيحة

@Abdulrahman_Hi

3 күн бұрын

والله جدا استغربت من المعلومات والمغالطات في هذا الفيديو. ونشرت تعليقا بالانجليزيه تقريبا نفس الكلام الذي انت نشرته. أغرب ما سمعت: "معاوية كان يخالف تعاليم الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم عندما كان كاتبا له". ما هذه التفاهات؟ ليته ذكر المصادر.... رضي الله عن معاوية وعن ابوه وعن أخوه.

@ElectronFieldPulse

2 күн бұрын

So, basically this video is worthless? Good to know. And thank god for google translate

Before the third khalifa die he requested help from his cousin but his cousin didn't respond and his main reason for war was because ali wanted to remove him from his place

@MuffinManUSN

7 күн бұрын

Are you talking about Wiz?

@user-im8wx7nj9o

7 күн бұрын

​@@MuffinManUSNwhat is wiz?

@user-hv2jb1zq1r

7 күн бұрын

Ali infact never tried to remove anyone , he is well known for not revolting against Abu bakr even tho his relatives and followers told him to do so , he did not so the islamic world would not get into fighting eachother , the next rashudin calips were so unpopular that when 3 of them died people Asked ali to come rule , which he did and fighted many rebels.

@YaakovEzraAmiChi

7 күн бұрын

Ali was treated unfairly as was his sons. 🤷‍♂️ It’s kind of ironic with how Muslims today, especially the concerts in America seem to become Arabized. They take Arab names and wear Arab clothing even though they live in NYC or Philly. Its ironic as it’s always been one reason for revolts in the past. The people didn’t like being forced to forget everything from before when they converted to Islam. It’s also ironic as historically, Muhammad’s family was treated unfairly. Ali and Fatimah as well as Husain and Hassan and the rest of the family were all treated unfairly and you can see that is the case for generations. Treated unfairly by rulers who didn’t like the attention they got. But now a day the history is ignored 🤷‍♂️ Muslims have always been their own worst enemies lol

@fogshadow9112

7 күн бұрын

Wow bro you couldn't have said it more. Most of Muslims today choose to follow the ways of the Ummayeds and Abbasid Islam rather the Islam of Muhammad and his ahul al bayt. That's why you see Shia fight for Palestinian while the rest watch, no some of them even help the zionist. ​@@YaakovEzraAmiChi

1:44 Stats of the Umuyyad Caliphate, the largest Islamic Arab empire of all time. 6:50 This first Caliph Mu'awaya set the foundatuons for the Umayyad Caliphate to be stable in the future.

1:22 You made a fatal mistake The Umayyads were not defeated in the Zab by Abu Muslim, but by Abdullah bin Ali, a member of the Abbasid dynasty.

@ghostd69

7 күн бұрын

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@Faisal-pb5gu

7 күн бұрын

@@ghostd69 I literally began to suspect that these channels depend on Wikipedia as the primary source of information The funny thing is that even Wikipedia says that the army that put the Abbasids in power was Arab "Most of the Khorasani soldiers who brought the Abbasids to power were Arabs.[160]"

@rambikshprasad4648

6 күн бұрын

​@@Faisal-pb5guthen who were khorashani???

@ghostd69

2 күн бұрын

@@rambikshprasad4648 Iranian and turks. But we talking about arabs tribes and army living in khoursan

@Faisal-pb5gu

2 күн бұрын

@@ghostd69 Khorasani is a geographical description, like a Syrian or Iraqi description, not linked to a specific ethnicity

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

They took Jizya from new Muslims, so they didn't rule by what Allah revealed.

@trapster1483

5 күн бұрын

seriously??? i didn't know that

@trapster1483

5 күн бұрын

where can i find evidence of that

You should have included the Great Berber revolt and the Murji'ah rebellions in Persia/Khorasan and the Kharijite rebellions of the Iraqi marshes and Najid and the Zaydi Shia revolts

@mauromaurito532

3 күн бұрын

What do you expect from ignorant people North Africa Barbaria or Tamazgha was the graveyeard of Arab armies. Also the Battle of Tours and Poitiers in which many Umayyad soldiers died had an impact on the Umayyads

@ghostd69

2 күн бұрын

@@mauromaurito532 All those revolt was crushed Berber berber revolt was eventually crushed in battle al asnam and al qarn, algeria was remain under umayyad and people of tanger in morcco pledge of allegiance to handela ibn safwan who crushed berber revolt in battle al asnam in chlef modern algeria and battle of tour or poitiers is same battle it was skrmkish and party raid didn't impact on umayyad and umayyas was countine with raid into francia after that battle

@mauromaurito532

2 күн бұрын

@@ghostd69 no not true Tunisia remained under Arab authority but the whole of Algeria and Morocco and Mauretania was ruled by Amazigh tribes the Kutama and Senhaja tribes ruled eastern Algeria the Fatimids who ousted the Aghlabids were helped by the Kutama who lived in Eastern Algeria

@mauromaurito532

2 күн бұрын

@@ghostd69 no after the Battle of Tours and Poitiers which was due to the arrogance of the Arab racistst never never dared the Muslims go north to France or Belgium there is even a large graveyeard called Balat Al Shuhada look it up. The Warfajuma berbers also attacked North Tunisia

@ghostd69

2 күн бұрын

​@@mauromaurito532 East algeria was also under umayyad and battle al asnam took place in west algeria crushed berber and also abd rahman al fahiri marched into west algeria and entered telemcen and cities around chasing down rest of berber rebles. Kutama and sanhaja was also crushed by abbasid general mohamed ibn al ash't al khouzai

11:29 And also with the help of Khan Tervel and the Bulgarian army who sandwiched the Umayyad army against the walls of Constantinople.

@williamrobert9898

7 күн бұрын

Nah they only attacked after the Romans did no less than 100% of the work

@SamBrockmann

6 күн бұрын

The Bulgars just saw a way to get some loot.

@ghostd69

2 күн бұрын

@@westsidermetalhead4997 Trevel khan and blugars army didn't do anything they didn't apporach consantinople wall till arab withdrawl, blugars attacked umayyad during their retreat they didn't help in raise of siege on city

Why you don't mentioned the backstabbing of the Abu Muslim by the calipha.

It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage episode about Aumayyad empire collapsed by Abbassid revolutionary armies...video clearly explained all reasons which imposed people's backed Abbassid assaults against former Aumayyed government from khorasan to Iran and Iraq....Aumayyed empire economic, society tyranny was unthinkable and horrible comparably to previous Rashedden caliphate Era....even in Syria

Video on Decline of Abbasid caliphate????

Thanks. Would have liked a more detailed coverage of the Battle of Zab but it did give me a nice overview.

Wonderful presentation. 👏 They had control of Andalusia for many years & their bloodlines mixed. Good reason why many South American looks Middle Eastern today.

They were in places they weren’t supposed to be

@MuffinManUSN

7 күн бұрын

That's why we keep Bleach around

@arijao92

7 күн бұрын

Kind of like today

@TruthSeeker8834

7 күн бұрын

As if romans and Byzantine greeks belonged to North Africa, middle east, gaul, breton?

@ghostd69

7 күн бұрын

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@-Blast

7 күн бұрын

Did you even made the effort to watch the video ?

The largest Muslim empire ever in history and the second greatest one!

Good video !

Abu Muslim Abd al-Rahman ibn Muslim [1] was a Persian[2][3] general who led the Abbasid Revolution that toppled the Umayyad dynasty, leading to the establishment of the Abbasid Caliphate.

@he4620

7 күн бұрын

The video did not point anything about the Persian man who overthrow Umayyid caliphicate...

@ghostd69

2 күн бұрын

@@he4620 Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

Yeah, being assassinated en masse by a rival faction will do that to you

Crazy what you can get people to believe with enough violence

@user-hv2jb1zq1r

7 күн бұрын

Crazy How People Dont Know Even A Bit About History But Still Say Their Opinion As If They Are 100% Right

@MuffinManUSN

7 күн бұрын

​@user-hv2jb1zq1r it's all an Op-Ed anymore

@bekirarslan1443

7 күн бұрын

Crazy how humans attacks other religios groupe, but forget, that christians even killed, rape and Forced conversion. The juws are was the First one….

@MCAbdo

7 күн бұрын

He clearly mentioned that the majority of the Umayyad population were non-Muslims and that's the Umayyads were tolerant to other faiths.. The 'violence' mentioned in the video was suppressing revolutions... Because well allowing them would break the country into pieces

@haristahir3472

7 күн бұрын

@@user-hv2jb1zq1r Yeah totally agree with you.

Does the Umayyads have something to do with Islam?

@tnrz5696

7 күн бұрын

Changing teams and being "caliph" with violence. Being racist and murdering your political opponents Has nothing to do with Islam...

@user-hv2jb1zq1r

7 күн бұрын

Technicaly No , cause they were not even connected to prophet himself

@johnmockingyou7547

7 күн бұрын

Of course it did 😏 Umayyads drove the final nail into the Sunni-Shia Schism 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 to bring an end to the Fitna Wars 🤪

@sulemanmanaffabdul4699

7 күн бұрын

@@tnrz5696 Do you understand my question?

@tnrz5696

7 күн бұрын

@@sulemanmanaffabdul4699 yes i'm sure that my answer is good enough

It's not Spain. It's the Iberian peninsula. Spain did not exist yet then.

@nuncasaberas5926

7 күн бұрын

Hispania

@I_lovesushi738

7 күн бұрын

Does it really matter bro?

@HH-yj3jc

7 күн бұрын

​@@nuncasaberas5926Yup Hispania.

@Benito-lr8mz

7 күн бұрын

Hispania or Iberian Peninsula

@TruthSeeker8834

7 күн бұрын

​@@nuncasaberas5926Hispania is given by romans.

Finest work!

4:17 alright it’s way more complicated than that and there are many parts that don’t make sense in the story

This battle took place not far from my city.

it's not 100 % of correct story but it's good video for non Muslims and non Arab to understand some of Middle East long History 👍🏼

Emmm I got a qurstion by the way if there the ummayad were stereotyping their people why did not the people take advantage of the civil war ?

Do a video on the Dabuyid Dynasty.

Why u don't mentioned zoroastrians that were in iran?

@Mohammed-jf2sp

5 күн бұрын

Why should he mention them?

@PatriotOfPersia

3 күн бұрын

​@@Mohammed-jf2sp Because majority of Iranians were Zoroastrian

@Mohammed-jf2sp

3 күн бұрын

@@PatriotOfPersia And what does this have to do with the topic?

@PatriotOfPersia

3 күн бұрын

@@Mohammed-jf2sp You don't need to prove that you are an Arab by saying nonsense.

@Mohammed-jf2sp

3 күн бұрын

@@PatriotOfPersia I don’t blame you hating for Arabs, they overthrew your empire, which you are proud of, but the real stupidity is what the world sees every year, the Iranians beating themselves with chains and crying because of the death of a person 1400 years ago.

You didnt even mentioned the main leader of this revolutionary which he was Persian abu muslim khorasani (behzadan pur vandad) He was the main reason of umayyid defeat !! And later he got murdered by the second abbasid caliphate al mansur beacuse of the arabs fear of his powers and popularity !!

@Faisal-pb5gu

7 күн бұрын

He was mentioned in the video and even claimed that he was the one who defeated the Umayyads in Zab, although all Arab sources state that the one who defeated the Umayyads was Abdullah bin Ali, a member of the Abbasid dynasty.

@ghostd69

7 күн бұрын

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.

@shadowgod1797

7 күн бұрын

true abu muslim regreted he helped arabs that he should have helped his fellow persians to take over persia again instead of helping abbasids what a shame

@Faisal-pb5gu

7 күн бұрын

@@shadowgod1797 He did not regret that he helped the Arabs He regretted killing thousands of Muslims. You can read the correspondence between him and Caliph Al Mansur. He did not talk about Arabs, Persians, or any of the modern nationalist nonsense. In any case, he died as a scum begging pardon for his life from the Caliph

@ghostd69

6 күн бұрын

@@shadowgod1797 Helping arabs ? Without abbasid support abu muslim wouldn't do anything he was mawali to arab tribe working to them as an clothing trader and thanks to arab tribes who revolt aganist umayyad and delcaring in thrid fitna before abbasid start their revolt, he tried to take over persia but abu jafar al mansour stopped him plus he wasn't nationlist he was just Pledge of allegiance to abbasid

Very interesting

Battle of the Great Zāb River in today's Iraq on January 25, 750 AD, was Abu Muslims Abbasid Caliphate with capital Kufa in today's Iraq VICTORY against the Umayyad Caliphate with capital Harran in today's Turkey.

@ghostd69

2 күн бұрын

Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali and abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia

@tomislavpetrov1179

2 күн бұрын

@@ghostd69 Merw in today's Turkmenistan became the capital of the Umayyad province of Xwarāsān (661-750). Throughout the Abbasid era (750-861), Merw remained the capital and most important city of Xwarāsān. The battle of the Great Zāb River changed the ruling dynasty in Merw.

Moroccan Berber revolt of 740 broke the Umayyads back. Shocked there is no mention of this.

@-Blast

7 күн бұрын

It wasn’t a “Moroccan” revolt since Morocco didn’t exist back then. And the Berbers failed to take the Umayyad provincial capital of Kairouan.

@John-pk9rw

7 күн бұрын

Moroccan? Lol. Morocco didn’t even exist. Stop embarrassing yourself Bousbirian.

@samiman5606

7 күн бұрын

@-Blast But the fatimed berbers take kairawan and the all of Tunisia

@blutherhood3893

5 күн бұрын

​@@-BlastIt was Moroccan since vast majority of the rebelliers were from Morocco and by the way Morocco existed as the kingdom of Mauretania

@Revitalization4241

4 күн бұрын

​​@@blutherhood3893Kingdom of Mauretania isn't related to the Moroccan identity which started with the Idrisids. Mauretanian tribes were also in nowdays Algeria and Numdian tribes were also present in nowdays Morocco. You Moroccan nationalists and Algerian nationalists shoudn't touch our Berber history. Alot of Houara Berbers and Ifranid Berbers in the Trara, Aures mountains formed around half of all Berber rebels

Short answer: it grew too large in a short time.

Carthage vs Rome 2

The ʿAbbasids were descended from an uncle of Muhammad. Seeing the weaknesses of the Umayyads, they declared a revolt in 747. With the help of a coalition of Persians, Iraqis, and Shīʿites, they put an end to the Umayyad dynasty with a victory against them at the Battle of the Great Zab River in 750.

Actually no Islamic source says that a caliph must be from the prophet's family lineage.

Next time make a video about the Great Berber revolt

Wow!!!This is a fascinating video of how the Umayyad Empire crumbled systematically after not even a centrury of ruling,good friends!!!:-D

@valeriodelaurentiis5614

7 күн бұрын

They were nonetheless a very influential empire, you gotta acknoweledge that

@MuffinManUSN

7 күн бұрын

​@@valeriodelaurentiis5614acknowledgia

@user-hv2jb1zq1r

7 күн бұрын

@@valeriodelaurentiis5614 altho i think the abbasid which started the islamic golden age were even more influential

@tnrz5696

7 күн бұрын

They spread Islam ,most of the theological , scientific and intellectual things were in Abbasid era not to mention their heritage to other Islamic states such as Seljuks, Mamluks and Ottomans@@user-hv2jb1zq1r

@ghostd69

7 күн бұрын

​@@valeriodelaurentiis5614 Abbasid took knoweldge from umayyad and their gov system and etc they learnt many things from umayyad

You didn't mention the Great Berber revolt against Umayyad arabs' tyranny ...

@Based_Beeast

7 күн бұрын

Look it's a western wannabe.

@zoanth4

7 күн бұрын

Oh the berbers, the pioneers of human freedom...oh wait they were a slaver nation

@valeriodelaurentiis5614

7 күн бұрын

​@@Based_Beeastlook it's an "eastern" sigma wannabe

@HH-yj3jc

7 күн бұрын

​@@valeriodelaurentiis5614At least he is a sigma not gay.

@samiman5606

7 күн бұрын

@HH-yj3jc At least his alfa not a pedophile

I see that the Umayyads just were not liked by people

Didn't the Umayyads rule the Iberian Peninsula for some time after that?

@abdibgm5748

Күн бұрын

Yes, they'll continue to rule the Iberian peninsula for about 4 centuries

Cool!

The fact: in every second he said that a huge number of soldier was christian😂❤ Bro in sasanid era The christians of iran was heavily forced to became zoroaster or didn't spread their religion and the one of the causes of these moves was that christian populations in iran hasbeen assmilated so why u said many of the soldier of abbasids were christian Then why u instead did not said they were zoroasters? or THEY WERE NON-ARAB MUSLIMS WHO WERE IRANIANS THAT CONVERTED TO ISLAM?

Moroccan Berbers killed the Umayyad elite forces, and consequenced other rebillions to happen.

“MUCH of Asia”??? Bruh, the Middle East isn’t MUCH of Asia. apparently whiever wrote this script doesn’t know Asia includes China, Mongolia, Central Asia, India, Southeast Asia, Japan, Siberia, Tibet… MUCH of Asia, my foot. stop with the western-centric view of the world.

@Alqoaity

5 күн бұрын

In the ancient world, Asia's borders ended with China, no one in the heart of world knew what was beyond that

@LexlutherVII

5 күн бұрын

​@@Alqoaity Lol, so everyone was scared of going beyond the unknown lands?? 😂

5:22 What? All of Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali may Allah be please with them, didn't come from direct lineage to Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him... where did you get that information from? Like Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman, Muawiyah may Allah be pleased with him is a distant cousin of Muhammad peace be upon him.

@Abdulrahman_Hi

3 күн бұрын

5:28 Again, WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? How can he oppose the prophet's beliefs? He would be immediately charged with blasphemy and the companions of the prophet will absolutely not tolerate such acts (death sentence most likely). Where are you getting this information from? And for you to portray it as "a matter of fact". If you are citing your ridiculous information from Shia sources, then that explains the exagerrated resentment they have for Muawiyah may Allah be pleased with him. This is nonsensical and unprofessional...🤢

@Abdulrahman_Hi

3 күн бұрын

6:05 this is getting ridiculous. He is totally getting his information from Shia sources only. Not only that, he is totally misinterpreting the shia sources, making ridiculous conclusions shias didn't even claim...

@-basharal-essa9513

3 күн бұрын

I am Syrian, may God have mercy on our ancestors Hisham bin Abdul Malik, Abdul Rahman Al-Dakhel, Muslima bin Abdul Malik, and many grandparents 💔🇸🇾

The racist policy of the Umayyads caused the fall of the Umayyad Empire also the treatment of Berbers like for instance the demands of Jizzyah and slaves to the Muslim Berbers was the straw and provoked a catastrophic revolt

The franks helped abassids against omyads

CORRECTIONS. 1- IT WAS NOT ABBSIDS ARMY BUT IT WAS THE AB ARMY MAINLY OF PERSIANS LATER THEY HANDED THE KINGDOM TO ABBSIDS BEACUSE THE ISLAMIC LAWS ALLOW ONLY THE HASHIMAT ONLY TO RULE. 2- UMMAYED ARMY HAD A LOT OF CHRISTIANS IN IT, BEACUSE LEVANT MAINLY WERE CHRISTIANS. 3- BOTH ARMIES WERE NAINLY NOT ARABS.

@BESTINTHEWORLD0007

2 күн бұрын

Islamic law in it's early form the Ruler was to be from Quraish not Hashem sepcificly The soldiers were Muslims from the yamanite Arab tribes who migrated to Syria after the destruction of Ma'rib dam and after the conquest they converted to Islam and Muawiyah established his relations with them after the Plague of amwas when he was a governer of Syrian in the late caliphate of Umar and Uthman They were Arabs but the Abbasid were mixed from Arabs who are from Iraq, Arabs who lived in Iran and Iranians who converted to Islam

@hussainabdulla127

2 күн бұрын

@@BESTINTHEWORLD0007 THE MINSTERS IN UMMAYED COURTS WERE CHRISTIANS LIKE SURJOHN AND THE WRITTING IN UMMAYED STATE WAS FOLLOWING ROMANS DEWAN UNTIL LATELY WAS CHANGED TO ARABIC. YOU DO NOT EXPECT PEPOLE SUDDENLY CHANGE THEIR RELIGION EVEN رو THE ARABS WERE CHRISTIANS SLOWLY THE MAJORITY CONVERTED TO ISLAM. ABU MUSLIM ALKORSANI INTENTION WAS TO GIVE THE RULE OF ISLAMIC WORLD TO BIN HASHIM, BUT BIN HASHIM DIDN'T WANT TO RULE AT THOSE TIME, THEN ABO MUSLUM GIVE TO THIER COUSINS THE ABBSIDS.

3:45 how did the Prophet Muhammed die in 632ad? that doesn't make any sense to me. the bc ad calender is divided by the 30 or so years Jesus was alive. so how is the Prophet Muhammed supposed to have lived according to this video almost 6-7 centuries after Jesus passed away? it doesnt make any sense to me i was always taught what eventually became Islam was begun when the Jewish/Hebrew/Persian/Babylonian wherever he was from originally Patriarch of Israel Abraham sent away Ishmail when Sarah finally became pregnant and went against her word and forced him to send away Ishmail and his mother into the desert/wilderness, and i was always taught/under the impression that it was only a few generations later the Islam rose up and that Islam was almost as old as Judaism/Israel itself and older by far then modern Christianity? but this video is implying that Christianity is 7 centuries almost older then Islam is? i don't understand.

Far west was Portugal.... 8:22 Portugal is the oldest country in europe. Why talk spain if Portugal is older?

@ahmedmuayad2013

7 күн бұрын

Probably because Cordoba the most prominent city in Al-Andalus was in Spain and not Portugal and it held more Importance.

12:11 Another mistake The revolution was not in Persia (western Iran), but in Khorasan (eastern Iran), a place where the Persians were always a minority. Most of the revolutionaries were Shiite Arabs (descendants of the Arabs who were displaced from Iraq in the era of Muawiyah I)

@darthpigeon

5 күн бұрын

Persians were minority in khorasan?😂😂😂even today the population is majority persian speaking

@Faisal-pb5gu

5 күн бұрын

@@darthpigeon At that time they were a minority The majority of the Khorasanis spoke the Sogdian, Bactrian, and Khwarezmian languages Dari Persian spread after Islam under the rule of the East Iranian/Turkic dynasties

@darthpigeon

5 күн бұрын

@Faisal-pb5gu depends on what part of khorasan you're speaking if we speaking the western part of khorasan(which was the most populated part) persian had become the major language replacing parthian by the late years of sassanids

There is a lot of mistakes in this video

Yeah, but not politics.

8:51 except for what they did to the shiites

What's with the overdone constant emphasis. We're all adults that dont need to be pandered to

5:30 name ONE belief that Muawiyah opposed as a scribe??????

The Empire Umayyad is Syria 🇸🇾❤

Why are people right over the details when the whole establishment of Arab supremacy and Muslim dominance of other religions has brought destruction and death to so many ^^ yes, arithmetics, medicine and universities are great, theocracy and racism, not so much.

So technically Spain has legitimacy 😂

@blutherhood3893

5 күн бұрын

It's Morocco that caused the collapse of the Umayyad empire, Moroccan Berbers killed the Ummayad elite forces that the Abassids wouldn't be able to overcome and also caused other rebellions.

I'm Algerian. Our country wasn't named "North Africa" but "Africa". Africa meant the Maghreb back then, not the subsaharan countries. And the first successful rebellion against the Umeyyads happened in our country, as early as the 740s (ten years before the Abbassids), with the Rustemid caliphate, with Tahert (Tiaret) as its capital.

@blutherhood3893

5 күн бұрын

They are not you it's Maysara Al Madghari that started tge rebellion and then Khalid Ibn Hamid Ezznati that completed it witg a vast majority of Moroccan Berber forces especially from what would be known as Burghwata later and with Moroccan war tactics and leadership, you and Ifriqiyyans lost a catastrophic loss in the battle of Al Asnam

@user-jt8vj1vm6y

5 күн бұрын

@@blutherhood3893 isn't Tahert in modern Algeria ?

@blutherhood3893

5 күн бұрын

@@user-jt8vj1vm6y Now you skipped all I aid to talk about the location, the location i just a location and isnot necessarily related to the part of the battle

@user-jt8vj1vm6y

5 күн бұрын

@@blutherhood3893 you could be right that the ibadite movement originated in the Atlantic coast of modern morocco. Because that area wasn't Christian and converted to Islam in the early 700s, just after the Arab invasion. The region of Tiaret was part of the kingdom of Altava and the Mauro-Roman kingdom and was Christian for at least 3 centuries. It seems unlikely that the people of that area would convert to islam so quickly and establish an islamic kingdom. Also, Rustum is a persian name. So it was a persian who preached ibadite islam to ex-polytheists from the Atlantic coast, and they established their capital inside the ex-kingdom of Altava, whose population was probably still majority Christian.

@ghostd69

2 күн бұрын

berber revolt was eventually crushed in battle al asnam and al qarn, algeria was remain under umayyad and people of tanger in morcco pledge of allegiance to handela ibn safwan who crushed berber revolt in battle al asnam in chlef modern algeria

Because they didn’t believe in Allah hard enough

P.s caliph Ali killed by a traitor follower Caliph muayaa never ever had been against any things of the prophet Muhammad belief And the caliphate is never ever dependent on how much you related to prophet Muhammad , the three first caliphs had not related by blood to the prophet Finally, I'm Syrian 😅 and Syria in that time won't be called Syria it's called Al Sham and it's Include Palestine, Jordan and Syria 😅

@الهاشمي-القرشي

6 күн бұрын

سوریا کانت تسمی سوریا حسب لهجه الارامیین العروبیین ولیس سریان ولکان الاسماعلیون اسموها شام

@الهاشمي-القرشي

6 күн бұрын

الخلفاء القرشیین کلهم یربطهم نسب بالنبی محمد ولیس فقط علي

🇸🇦❌🇮🇷✅Iranian Abu Muslim Khorasani overthrew the Umayyad caliphate and defeated their powerful army and brought the Abbasids to power, but the Abbasids killed her, the Arabs never had honor🇮🇷 He was not only the commander, but also the leader of the movement against the Umayyads, I wish he would have become the king himself.

Imam hussain was responsible

معلوماتك خاطئة عندما قلت ان معاوية أول حاكم لم تكن لديه قرابة بالنبي محمد فأنت تقصد أن الذين حكمو قبل معاوية فهم حكمو لأنهم لديهم قرابة مع النبي ؟هذا غير صحيح طريقة الاختيار كانت بناء على معايير أخرى وكانت بناءا على اجتماعات بين الصحابة تم الاختيار بالاجماع .سقوط الخلافة الاسلامية كان بسبب وجود صراعات على الحكم وكذالك ابتعاد الحكّام عن تطبيق التعاليم الحقيقية للاسلام

"The Caliphate was extremely tolerant with other faiths!" ...cough...jizyah tax...cough...

@Masitu0031

7 күн бұрын

Tolerant COMPARED to their contemporary. Take, say, 19th century Russian Empire with Kosher Tax, and (occasionally) conscriptions, plus pogroms.

@samiman5606

7 күн бұрын

The umayyad caliphate even forced jizya on Muslims native berbers

@tnrz5696

7 күн бұрын

Maybe they are tolerant for other faiths with same race but we are pretty sure that they weren't tolerant with the non-Arab Muslims

@Masitu0031

7 күн бұрын

@@samiman5606 please post your sources on that claim.

@user-im8wx7nj9o

7 күн бұрын

They didn't really care about your religious they just wanted a reason to tax you...some became Muslims but they still taxed them

Ummayads were the worst islamic Caliphate

@major2707

10 сағат бұрын

😁... because they face civil wars

@shia_pan_iranist

10 сағат бұрын

@@major2707 they were evil and racist

May Allah bless ummayad caliphate the way the real deal and spread Islam form china to France , and have been oppressed by the lies done by the Shia appointed writers of the so called Sunni Abbasid caliphate, May Allah bless Muawiyah he got revenge on the killers of caliph Othman and saved Islam , thank you for the video if you want to know real history of Islam check out saber mashhour on KZread

Im 1st

1 min

Absolutely not first

Based abbasid the greatest revelation in history who destroyed the strongest and biggest empire in history(it their time) in only 3 years

Best Video Yet Also 75th comment my first :)

Romans taking 500 years for their empire : Umayyad which took 60 years : 🗿

@JoeyP946

7 күн бұрын

yea. Really proves the point of being a religion of peace

@KameroonEmperor

7 күн бұрын

What's this supposed to even mean

@RamRami238

7 күн бұрын

​​​​​​@@JoeyP946Islamic Political Influence spreading by the sword doesn't equal that the religion itself is spreading by the sword and the Ummayad Caliphate's population was Christian Majority. Cope

@JoeyP946

7 күн бұрын

@@RamRami238 hahahaha. Without lies Islam dies! The main religion of the Umayyad Caliphate was Islam. The Umayyad Caliphate, which ruled from 661 to 750 CE, was the second of the four major caliphates established after the death of the Prophet Muhammad. The Umayyad rulers were Muslim and governed according to Islamic principles and laws.

@JoeyP946

7 күн бұрын

@@RamRami238 Expansion of the Islamic Empire: The Umayyads significantly expanded the Islamic empire, spreading Islam across a vast territory that included parts of Asia, Africa, and Europe. Administration and Governance: They implemented an administrative system influenced by both Islamic principles and the existing Byzantine and Sassanian models. Arabic was made the official language of administration. Religious Practices: The Umayyad Caliphate supported the construction of mosques and Islamic centers of learning. Major cities such as Damascus, the capital, became important centers of Islamic culture and education.

Ummayids were Arian Christians. Islam was created by the Abbasids.

@Faris-bk6xu

14 сағат бұрын

Lol wat

@fantasia55

3 сағат бұрын

@Faris-bk6xu There exists no evidence of Islam in the 7th century. The Standard Islamic Narrative is a later fiction.

@fantasia55

3 сағат бұрын

@@Faris-bk6xu There exists no evidence of Islam in the 7th century. The Standard Islamic Narrative is a later fiction.

The Abbasids are actually 99% Iranians and the family of the prophets blood line. The family of the prophet unhappy about not being at the top of the Ummayads allied with the Iranian people dissatisfied about the fact that they have no right to lead the caliphate as Iranians. Ummayads kept the caliphate among Arabs. This was the Abbasid revolution on its way. Abbasid laid the foundation for Islamic golden age.

@ghostd69

2 күн бұрын

99% persian 😂 in ohio

Reconquista fue la solucion .

@user-hv2jb1zq1r

7 күн бұрын

solution to what?

@samiman5606

7 күн бұрын

Solution that couse in you low birth rates right now?

@manikandankumaran1012

7 күн бұрын

​@@samiman5606the only reason your cult survive😂 sad😂

@samiman5606

7 күн бұрын

@manikandankumaran1012 Well at least my cult gives my people over 6 bebes each women joke to you with no bebes

@h.w.barlow6693

7 күн бұрын

​@@samiman5606that's what roaches do.

You made a lot of fatal errors , I’m disappointed on why you using Wikipedia as source material.just delete the whole video because it’s historical fiction not historical facts.

When well the arabs learn.

@samiman5606

6 күн бұрын

Arabs they never learned they will always make the same mistakes

killing eachother during prayers shows how seriously these guys took their religion 😂

Because allah is not God

@-Blast

7 күн бұрын

It literally means God in Arabic.

@fresh-eggs

7 күн бұрын

There's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.

@superyamky

5 күн бұрын

True. So many religions and different beliefs​@@fresh-eggs

@jazimjamal7634

2 күн бұрын

@@fresh-eggs you should say scientific evidence

@fresh-eggs

2 күн бұрын

@@jazimjamal7634 Nope. Because I am not making a case for science.

💪☪️

@rajsekharkarajada9830

7 күн бұрын

Desert ra😂

@History_Teller1250

6 күн бұрын

​​@@rajsekharkarajada9830And these desert men conquered most of the known world in a century. What did you achieve to laught like this ?

I hate to write it but...first

@MuffinManUSN

7 күн бұрын

I hate that you wrote it

@mohammedchan4352

7 күн бұрын

@@MuffinManUSN sorry but I had to

@micahcook165

7 күн бұрын

Why did you do us like that

@mohammedchan4352

7 күн бұрын

@@micahcook165 I'm sorry ok? I couldn't resist doing it i think I'm possessed or something

@MuffinManUSN

7 күн бұрын

@mohammedchan4352 That doesn't make it right. I just sold both my vehicles and purchased an E-Bike now. I don't have a helmet and only 1 Elbow and 1 knee pad. Now as I text and ride my "vehicle" I'm at risk for injuries because of what you did. Forgiveness is not likely.

Fun fact: One of the reason for abbasid revolt is the siege of Qistantinia because the ummayads were tooo invincible

@DivineAegis02

6 күн бұрын

Istanbul didn’t exist until after WW1. It was always called as Constantinople by Christians and Muslims and Muhammad. Only the secular Turks changed its name after the caliphate was abolished.

@AlphaSections

6 күн бұрын

@@DivineAegis02 I know right, they're so disrespectful.

@hellheaven-dy2bz

6 күн бұрын

@DivineAegis02 I will call it qistantinia sorry for calling it Istanbul 24/7 everyone on social media calls it Istanbul even beta squad

@hellheaven-dy2bz

6 күн бұрын

@@AlphaSections sorry

Hey, make video about Indonesia please. As an Indonesian, Islam didn't really come with trade especially to what happened with my ethnic groups, an indigenous ethnic group in the middle of Sumatran jungles and Bukit Barisan mountain range near the largest vulcanic lake in the world. In 1539, Acehnese Sultanate invaded my ancestors's land when one of our king refused Islam. Aceh faced difficulties during the war then they bought & hired Ottoman weapons & mercenaries to invade us. In the 1810s during Padri War, an Islamic civil war in Minangkabau, Padri soldiers heard a cannibalistic pagan tribes in the middle of North Sumatra remained as pagans, Padri soldiers invaded our kingdom and massacred 200.000 people even executed our king for not accepting Islam, they brutally ransacked our villages/cities & massacred my ethnic groups who refused their religion. They were failed to conquer us when a cholera outbreak happened thanks to dead bodies that leaked cholera. After they failed to conquer us, our ancestors were devastated after watching our ransacked kingdoms and dead relatives even cholera outbreak happened and severely decimated our population. My ancestors became hostile towards outsiders/foreigners. Years later, a couple of US Baptist missionarists came and introduced Christianity. Too bad, the locals thought they were another hostile foreigners/outsiders and they caught & ate them. Before Christianity came, my people were pagans who had cannibalistic culture/rituals. My ancestors conducted cannibalism towards people who did terrible crimes such as rape, murder, or treason. POWs were also eaten back then. Before Christianity, my ancestors believed if we ate people, it'd grant us magical strength. We also did child sacrifice ritual by sacrificing li'l boys to gain black magic. Besides cannibalism and child sacrifice, my ancestors were known as jewellery makers and weavers. A German missionarist came and introduced Christianity among my people. He built schools, hospitals, etc. But a lot of kingdom citizens hated him coz Christianity could destroy our culture and religion such as our cannibalistic rituals. There're some reports that some people tried to assassinate him to stop Christianity from destroying our old faiths and culture but failed. Cannibalism and child sacrifice were eventually banned when Dutch colonial regime imposed anti cannibalism law towards us after annexing us in the 1907. If Christianity never came, perhaps my people would still do capital punishment in form of cannibalism and child sacrifice. Unlike other Indonesian regions which were colonized for 350 years, we only got conquered in 1907 when Dutch soldiers succesfully assassinated our priest king. Dutch faced difficulties at fighting a cannibalistic nation in the middle of Sumatran jungles near the largest lake in Indonesia. Many historians keep using my country's history as propaganda while ignoring their brutality towards an indigenous ethnic group in Sumatra who were known as cannibalistic pagan tribes before Christianity

@user-ft7bj4wv3y

7 күн бұрын

L indonesia, ur country has no history

@msh-l33t

7 күн бұрын

Source: trust me bro lmao. You made a lot of effort to make up some false history. 10 points for creativity.

@epg96

7 күн бұрын

@@user-ft7bj4wv3y remember Austronesian civilizations? 😆😆😆

@epg96

7 күн бұрын

@@msh-l33t dude, why do u think we r the only largest Sumatran peoples who refused Islam?

@JoeyP946

7 күн бұрын

@@epg96 isn't 99.5 percent of Indonesia muslim?

Religious freedom? You are kidding. Only if the non-Muslims paid the jizya, or converted, or left, else got your head chopped off - as described in the Islamic books.

@jazimjamal7634

2 күн бұрын

What is wrong with paying jizya and living with your belief? U pay less than muslims, not obliged to take part in war, and if you are poor or a monk u are not asked to pay jizya? Is there something wrong with tax jizya?

@austromyrtus

2 күн бұрын

@@jazimjamal7634 what do you mean “pay less than Muslims?” Jizya was an additional tax. Just like a western country imposing a “Muslim” tax today, which they won’t. If you mean Zakat, then you need to remember that Christians tithed 10%, which is much more than zakat. And of course they were subject to all the taxes and charges that Muslims were otherwise subject to, not permitted to get good job or have any job where they would be boss of Muslims- just the same as it is today in Pakistan and other Muslims countries where this discrimination keeps the minorities in servitude. Imagine the US barring Muslims from being accountant, lawyers, politicians, police etc ! No more taqiyah please.

@jazimjamal7634

2 күн бұрын

@@austromyrtus only Islamic taxes were zakat, ushr, jizya and kharaj. Zakat was for muslims, jizya for dhimmi, ushr and kharaj was paid by both.

@jazimjamal7634

2 күн бұрын

@@austromyrtus you need to show that minorities suffered under caliphate.

@pikelrick7542

2 күн бұрын

(did this person know that christians during middle age way more violence than caliph 😓)

Bad animation.

Because Allah willed it 🤭

@Tililo

7 күн бұрын

Bro thinks he's funny 💀(oh and btw he did)

@johnmockingyou7547

7 күн бұрын

@@Tililo I've not even getting warmed up yet 😏 Now that you've brought it up, here we go! Allah willed it that Muawiyah 1 (son of Abu Sufyan) had a hand in the death of Hasan son of Ali 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 & his son Yazid put an end to Mohammad's male line by the death of Husayn son of Ali & brother of Hasan 🤪 Allah willed it ✌🏻

@TimurKhan-dn5vx

7 күн бұрын

@@johnmockingyou7547 nope slaves

@user-hv2jb1zq1r

7 күн бұрын

@@johnmockingyou7547 uhh allah definitely did not will to kill the prophet direct descendants , please get your sources right this is a historic video not a religious +there are much more example just like the muawiyah coming into power in history , get over it kid its history

@bekirarslan1443

7 күн бұрын

@@johnmockingyou7547and ? Are you thing you are funny or only want to beliefe ?

It is haram to show the faces of the companions of the prophet which is Muawiyah. The prophet would congratulate Muawiyah for his future empire

@deepworld7

6 күн бұрын

Why Shia people hate Muawiyah?

@hellheaven-dy2bz

3 күн бұрын

@deepworld7 they think he killed ali he did not rather his advisors who killed othman ali did not know when he found out they killed him

Its collapse was inevitable. Forced conversion, seeing Non-Arabs as inferior, I can list more. The Abbasids were way better, no forced conversions, no racism...