I might be biased, because this is my field, but this could be AI training to identify US ships in the future visually. Being able to do so at speed or realistic to battlefield conditions provides much better training data than anything simulated.

@jwickerszh

2 жыл бұрын

Technically yes, and it wouldn't need to be US specific (how often would you have a friendly carriers that close to a target carrier) but it may be impered by weather conditions. It might have sensors and AI to avoid hitting an escort ship though or provide resistance to jamming and counter measures.

@ChiefCabioch

2 жыл бұрын

I don't believe anything considered hypersonic in the Mach 5 region or higher is going to be able to maneuver to hit a ship that's moving and turning

@HappyDuude

Жыл бұрын

I think you're overthinking that to be honest. With satellites, carrier battle groups are not hard to find. The target is literally the biggest ship in a co-ordinate set. There wouldn't really be an overfitting or misclassification problem here. This leaves aside that of you really did want this for training, you would want it moving to get a variety of angles and aspects for your training data -- but even that wouldn't allow for any lists or similar. Edit: to clarify, yes there would be AI training benefit, but I doubt these are exclusively for AI visual recognition training

@andrewjvaughan

Жыл бұрын

@@HappyDuude I don't know enough about the weapons systems to know that, but my guess would be identification of certain areas of the ships would certainly be beneficial and more important for a warhead camera, not just which ship is largest

@MrCastodian

Жыл бұрын

@@ChiefCabioch Why? This is nothing new, the first Maneuverable Reentry Vehicle were active in the 70s, it’s just a fast missile with some form of guidance, in the 80s the first true guided ballistic missile entered service, it was guided by an imaging radar, it was an American Pershing missile, it’s been 30 years since that and billions of dollars spent, it’s obvious they work.

i cannot believe how interesting you make your subjects sound, not only do I focus to hang on every word but I end up scrutinising the illustrations as well. Unscripted! You have a wonderful speaking voice and your competency is unquestionable.

@HISuttonCovertShores

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

The US carrier's model is on a railroad and it can move at the speed of actual carrier in the sea. A good target practice for hypersonic missile.

@zhoubaidinh403

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah but can it wiggle?

@americanknow8232

2 жыл бұрын

@@zhoubaidinh403 It is multi-head. No need for wiggling.

@truthful3777

2 жыл бұрын

@@zhoubaidinh403 Why need to wiggle? It dead right centre at the blink of the eye. ...

@zhangyi5145

2 жыл бұрын

@@zhoubaidinh403 wiggling track is actually computable though

@merafirewing6591

6 ай бұрын

​@@zhangyi5145 that hypersonic missile might not work.

I have been waiting in anticipation for another video from this channel. You provide great analysis on all things navy.

Just watch this video.... I found a highly interested. Been a little over a month since I've watched one of your videos, and I must say I think your audio has gotten better....this makes it easier to take in your information. Have a great day.... Monte

Very interesting. I think one reason they are testing on land instead of waterborne is that it precludes the possibility of adversary intelligence collection of missile debris from the ocean floor. UUVs, Submarines, and submersibles have quite advanced (classified) collection capabilities.

@YaMomsOyster

2 жыл бұрын

@@Jack-lb1nt what?

@Jack-lb1nt

2 жыл бұрын

@@YaMomsOyster I can't remember what I said exactly but if you hit the water with an object that's going Mach 5 or better there will be nothing to retrieve thank you for pointing out someone tampered with my comment

@amcneilly84

2 жыл бұрын

i would guess safety and cost i.e. less risk of hitting commercial ships in the populated waters vs remote desert. The ai might track the wrong ship given its initial high altitude tracking. Easier to build land based carrier replica than floating.

@jwickerszh

2 жыл бұрын

China has a rather busy sea traffic, not the safest environment to test AI guided ballistic missiles ... unless you'd tow those carrier sized targets far off but that's a bit unpractical. It's also a lot easier to safely monitor the impact on the ground as you just need basic sensors instead of having to use ships. Intelligence wise it's more of a side effect I think, but sure, also western forces would be very interested in tracking those missiles to develop possible early warning or interception capabilities which they can't do when those are tested inland.

@oscaro3157

2 жыл бұрын

It's also waaaaay cheaper.

Yay he's back!!

thanks you as always for your amazing content love the GEOINT // TECHINT parts ...

Love your videos please keep uploading!!

You've doubled in subscribers since I joined, I'm happy to see that. Another informative video. You have a knack for 'off-the-cuff' narration, it suits these videos well. Thank you!

@gyasiansa3358

2 жыл бұрын

H I Sutton is a genius

@skyboundmktg

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah love his narration. Love the videos where he shuts down comments about being unscripted and his mic quality. Cracks me up every time

@grego15

2 жыл бұрын

JEEN YUHS!

@theacmemovement9677

2 жыл бұрын

Funny I was subscribed to this channel just found out this morning.

@shmeckle666

Жыл бұрын

Ep

Playing catch up again thanks for the analysis

Reminds me of the WW2 ship-shaped ground targets near Elvedon (52.35510119121764, 0.6402724247769583). Still faintly visible on modern aerial images, but clearer on the 1946 aerials.

i recently found your channel, and it is very very informative.. i love the details and the knowledge behind it, i like the narration and good, true and honest picturing of the images. and maxar when maxar can shoot such detailed images, holy smokes my tin foil zylinder is glowing :D

There is actually a carrier making a hard turn in the Chinese desert, which simulates what’s likely to happen when a US carrier realizes it’s the recipient of a DF express package.

@stolly27

2 жыл бұрын

you don't want a piece of the US military. You will be up for a ruth awakening

@lordlee6473

2 жыл бұрын

@@stolly27 lol. What does it have to do with you? You ain’t AngloSaxon, you are a Hispanic discriminated and bullied by the AngloSaxons. GTFOH

@Yurilon

2 жыл бұрын

Noice lol

@jwickerszh

2 жыл бұрын

Ha, SF for inland delivery, DF for international deliveries at sea 😅

@djtan3313

2 жыл бұрын

Did it get hit?…

Thank you for update of threats to carriers. Hope you can do submarine threat to carrier.

Please keep up the awesome work! It is always a pleasure to see your videos. It is very muhc interesting to listen to your braod and detailed knowledge about the under/over sea technology and everythinbg related to it. I would realy like to see longer videos, where you can go sideways or which ever way you want and just talk about everything you know about the topic. It is so interesting to learn and know more about it and since you have that much knowledge it is very much appreciated if you can educate us. So please do not hesitate just make them how you want and if you want make them longer. And just as a suggestion maybe you could do a more submarine briefs like you did about the Belgorod, but maybe this time about the Typhoon or what ever you like. Thank you for your great work I appreciate it very much.

@pfisherking

2 жыл бұрын

^This

@HISuttonCovertShores

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the kind words The war in Ukraine has messed up the usual flow of topics, hope to be able to get back to focusing on submarines soon

Could the circular markings be for the initial inertial guidance system? If there are impact marks inside, it would either mean a test of the missile inertial guidance system (test the basic accuracy), or the failure of acquiring (identifying) the ship in the port (AI accuracy test).

There is a channel called ”HypOps” that simulated a realistic battle between these adversaries with these weapon systems. Worth a watch. It is the two oldest videos on that channel.

Beautiful artwork Sutton. When are you going to start painting happy little clouds?

Great info. Would love a full video on weapons known to be using AI Targeting.

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

The problem there would be that so much of it is secret. Also the field is constantly changing. It's all programming at the end of the day and no military is going to willingly share proprietary code

Hello cer. That is a strange aircraft carrier. What kind of engines do they need to navigate in the desert sand? Thanks

Love you my friend. Hugs from bohemian forest. Crystal clear. Hugs again.

Fascinating video

Pretty cool and informative video

I get what your saying that blue army is traditionally used for OPFOR by China. But is there a chance that "Blue Army" might have more to do with blue water navies? just a side thought Main Thought: I have heard rumors of larger VLS systems for the Americans, larger than the MK57, back at a previous employment position... do you think that is perhaps a, prelude to large RIM missiles with hypersonic capability(or maybe ABM), in the American Navy? Thanks for the videos they are quite informative

It's all very well testing your missile against targets in the desert that are covered in radar reflectors, but what happens when you then try using it against a target that's trying to be radar-stealthy and which is surrounded by water that presumably behaves rather differently to sand?

It is no surprise to us Chinese regarding these target practice sights. I'm certain that the US and other countries have similar systems in place. The empty desert are the perfect place for it.

@HafiZzZzZz

2 жыл бұрын

Yup. Usa have mock ups of J-20 jets in Georgia, USA for practice.

11:55 yes we did. they do have several submarine launched anti ship missiles.

I haven't been getting notifications of your new videos

The xx3 and xx9 is designed to hit only shape targets only.Enter the shape and that's what it will hit.

I've always wondered what the result would be when America went to war with a powerful country, and what could happen to its Carriers. I hope we never find out.

@Arag0n

2 жыл бұрын

They will be sink or be left in home, as too expensive to be lost. That's what happened to battleships in ww1

@slslbbn4096

2 жыл бұрын

That's on top of the devastation and depopulation of American East and West coast cities. They are all marked for biochemical retaliation in the event of American intervention in Taiwan - something kept secret from the American public for obvious reasons

@truthful3777

2 жыл бұрын

I am more worried if being hit what disaster it will bring if the Nuclear waste spill on the ocean ....How much damaged it would bring to the world?!? The sea water flows through out the world...

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

​@@Arag0n you need to read more history! Battleships were used extensively by all sides during ww1! Ok maybe not much by the USA but they weren't in the war for long.

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

​@@truthful3777 similar to what happens when nuclear subs have been lost. How bad the damage is will depend on where it happens.

10:29, maybe the circular target with multiple impacts is in case the missile can't find the target, or is cancelled to a fallback?

My favorite channel 🙂

@gyasiansa3358

2 жыл бұрын

Me too

hmmm，target acquisition systems analysis of remote sensing systems？and calibration in desert environ with extreme temperature fluctuations thru out 24 hours；thx for the visual walk thru

Stop apologizing for your narration! It’s great. I only wish you’d make more videos.

I like how you snuck some Sean in there.

how are those targets made? cardboard? cement?

I love the bullseye in the middle of the Iranian target carrier😅

How about laser weapons? Can they down a hypersonic asbn?

Thks

What would Us do if China sailed their carries on the coast of america?, enough said

@liammarra4003

2 жыл бұрын

Such it the phuck up. That's about it.

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

That would be interesting. I mean the USA would have to be huge hypocrites to protest. If the Chinese ships are in international waters then it's freedom of the seas and the USA would have to smile and wave Interestingly I don't see china doing it. The USA is obsessed with china. I don't think china cares much what the USA does. Other than hoping the us keeps spending themselves into oblivion.

Well done. Clearly the age of AI in warfare is upon us. Carrier strike group defense will have to evolve accordingly, perhaps with lasers and/or revival of the moribund rail gun development projects.

@kineahora8736

2 жыл бұрын

Lasers are definitely a thing. Being tested right now by Israel as the next step in evolution of their rocket defenses after Iron dome: turns out lasers make a lot of sense for several reasons-they don’t use any perishable ordnance, so it’s a big cost savings issue, and of course there is speed: doesn’t matter how hypersonic a missile is, if the laser is light-speed.

@byloyuripka9624

Жыл бұрын

@@kineahora8736 laser anti missile has been pushed far and abandoned in new mexico and that 747 project. the most powerful railgun destroyed a warehouse of capacitors.... not yet

It’s normal for all military to do practice so that they will be prepared if needed. Practice make perfect.

Just a thought, but if they are using AI wouldn't that justify the use/purchase of physical deception kits similar to how old merchants/warships had funnels cut off or modified to hide?

@mandowarrior123

Жыл бұрын

Call back to you, we are seeing the beginnings of that, Russia disguising its ships, good call.

@Kav.

Жыл бұрын

@@mandowarrior123 Indeed we are (although I think Russia is trying to disguise them from Ukrainian USVs more than AI). It'll be interesting to see how multi-spectral camouflage for ships develops with this actually, with IR cameras etc being used in place of pure visible light.

I noticed this video 2 days late... It's 3:18 AM, but I aint going to bed now

6 months ago ? The systens are obviojsly in their final testing phases. The sensor systems being used,, are to evaluate the impacts.

The US has used electro optical recognition in sub munitions for years now. The BLU-109 ( if I recall nomenclature correct) can be dropped over intertwined vehicles in combat. The submunition spins and scans the battle field below identifying targets. If it comes across a vehicle it compares the picture to its database. If it’s a U.S. vehicle it doesn’t fire but if it’s an enemy design, mainly soviet it fires. I’m assuming the missile is using radar and several other options, IR, optical, UV and even anti-radiation (radar and radio emissions) and comparing it to a previously uploaded database. I’m wondering if these could be a one hit kill weapon, if you watch a sink-ex ( sinking exercise) videos on older ships the US ships have taken tremendous amounts of punishment, and that’s just a stationary ship with no maneuvering, countermeasures or damage control parties working. Although new ships now are lucky to have thin armor compared to the behemoths we built in WW2.

@aaronclair4489

10 ай бұрын

I believe you're talking about the skeet dropped by the BLU-108 and CBU-97/CBU-105 combination. I also don't think the BLU-108 does as much target recognition as you think. It has a laser rangefinder and a thermal sensor, and it recognizes targets by seeing if a target is the height of a tank (with the laser) and the temperature of a tank (with the thermal sensor). But I don't think the submunition does any more target analysis than that, and I don't think the thermal sensor has more than a handful of pixels. This simple design keeps the cost reasonable (probably ~$10K-20K per submunition) and the size small. AI image processing wasn't super amazing in 1992.

no. In our Chinese OSINT＇s opinion，the air launched missile in h6 isn't designed for anti ship but for nuclear balance instead

@paulloveless9180

2 жыл бұрын

Interesting. Are you suggesting that it is nuclear or just very large conventional?

@fosterwilliams1073

2 жыл бұрын

@@paulloveless9180 we calculate its max range and find out the missile can hit most region of Australia when launched from East China Sea or hit Hawaii and San Francisco when launched from Sea of Okho tsk. so that missile is designed for nuclear strike. it's a part of nuclear deterrent against US and AUS

@fosterwilliams1073

2 жыл бұрын

@@paulloveless9180 According to the PLARF tradition. it should use conventional／nuclear warhead like DF26

very cool videos

It for counter measures precautions

I don't see anywhere there is proof any ASBM works against moving ships as the physics are very difficult to overcome. At hypersonic speeds, there is a plasma sheath covering the missile that acts like a Faraday cage preventing any EM waves from penetrating. So how will they use radar seekers? Infrared is similarly difficult as there's a glowing fireball in front of the heat seeker.

@msytdc1577

2 жыл бұрын

Though I highly doubt they would do it this way, theoretically, the missile payload could consist of two parts, the primary steered impactor, and a secondary sensor portion that detaches near the terminal phase that then decelerates sufficiently to be able to sense and communicate in a forwards direction. That sub-payload would then direct the impactor with terminal guidance by communicating with it via it's rear, which has clear enough transmissibility through any reentry plasma. It is how the early cold war US short range nuclear tipped anti ballistic interceptor missiles were directed to their targets from ground stations, as they encountered the same issue as they accelerated to hypersonic speeds within seconds while in the thick low atmosphere, surviving only through ablative shielding on their noses.

@MrCastodian

Жыл бұрын

If USA could do this in the early 80s, why can’t China and at least 4 other nations do it today?

Well done China. If it is good for the goose it is good for the gander!!

Form the Art of War by Sun Tzu 用兵之法，无恃其不来，恃吾有以待也，无恃其不攻，恃吾有所不可攻也。 Rely not on the likelihood of the enemy’s not coming, but on our own readiness to receive him; not on the chance of his not attacking, but rather on the fact that we have made our position unassailable.

Isn't aircraft carriers sitting ducks to torpedoes ???😢😢😢

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

You have to get close enough to launch a Torpedo. That's why hypersonic warheads are a focus of research

Why did the IJN practicevin a island group that resemble the Hawian island..

They want to use a optical rocket.

So why are there no damages to it if its a target? Maybe it's for practicing landing and take-off on moving platform for inexperience pilots?

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

Watch the video 😂. They are built in weapons testing sites 🙄

@spankythemonkey9828

Жыл бұрын

@@AdamMGTF Thank you. It's been 10 months since my comment, now I don't even remember.

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

@@spankythemonkey9828 your welcome :)

Is that artificial port literally generic, or does it mimic any particular port? Maybe they couldn't help but leave a clue? It also wouldn't surprise me if the mock ships were used for drone targeting, either. Why waste a good target? Thanks for the vid. Known about these ships for a good bit now, nice to see your keen insight to explain what they're shooting at them with.

This is old news. The aircraft carrier on the desert is built exact size of US replica on a rail track moving at the speed of 30 knots. China uses it as moving target practice.

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

That's what the video says......

Yes. They no longer need airborne targeting systems. They can be sent to a particular areas to independently and selectively attack targets and not doubt prioritize them: hit a carrier of they see one otherwise a destroyer for example or large tanker depending upon how they are programmed for a misssion. Hmmm. (I doubt that they can change these mission parameters once in flight though.) I hope Uncle Sam is listening carefully and developing suitable countermeasures. I wonder if a destroyer could make itself look like a carrier with some kind of projected chaff at the last minute. hmmm.

A few grey cells got together and produced a random thought about U.S. Navy and its autonomous boats. I was thinking that all of the VLS cells on manned ships would be defensive missiles, while the unmanned VLS boats would carry the offensive missiles. It's not a fully formed thought, I'm still trying to iron it out.

@WhiskyCardinalWes

2 жыл бұрын

Somehow I'm getting a cross of David Weber's Honor Harrington pod laying ships, crossed with a modern surface ship that can launch a lot of 'pod boats' with VLS that can fire off a bunch of missiles at once. It's early morning and the caffeine delivery system hasn't kicked in yet.

@stalinbalans3030

2 жыл бұрын

@@WhiskyCardinalWes honestly, that's a great idea given how ssm lethality increased dramatically the last few decades, 6th gen fighter projects are developing a similar concept. I think that navies should shift from manned to unmanned smaller surface ships to improve survivability and cut down expenses

@bumponalog7164

2 жыл бұрын

The problem with unmanned ships is unlike aircraft damage control can be very successful in preventing the loss of the ship.

@stalinbalans3030

2 жыл бұрын

@@bumponalog7164 they're expendable anyway, at least compared to a conventional manned warship. Corvette sized unmanned ships (or even smaller) could be produced in large numbers at cheap costs so losses would be tolerable

@1blueeye

2 жыл бұрын

Interesting thoughts. The ability to avoid life-support systems would dramatically reduce costs, obviously. There are many considerations, but it is an interesting concept.

Hi H.i, i already knew the answer. Im just here to give a thumbs 👍 up. And probably learn something new,lol.

Time travel ships from sometime during WW3?

Well, i can give a vague guess at a few things. The gliding one, will lose momentum and airspeed with every turn/manuever it has to make, also, the faster these missiles travel, the less time you have to divert or cancel.

@dirkkarmel5209

2 жыл бұрын

At these speeds, the missile has liittle need to adjust it's approach.

Interesting. Could it also be possible that these are just used for calibrating reconnaissance satelites? I assume that an aircraft carrier would take evasive manoeuvres when under attack and not just travel in a straight line.

@mekaerwin7187

2 жыл бұрын

Reconnaissance satellites don't make craters in test ranges though.

@MadComputerScientist

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, doesn't jive with 10:10 . They probably calibrate their recon satellites on actual carriers, since one can do so non-destructively.

Hi H.i., already know the answer. I just came by to give the video a thumbs 👍 up.

It always surprised me that the Soviets (Russians) and Chinese denote their forces in Red, and the enemy in Blue, when we do the exact opposite.

@mcz9733

2 жыл бұрын

Its just colors, so their meaning is subjective.

@user-nd9jp2lj2r

2 жыл бұрын

I would presume it has to do with their flags being red while the NATO flag is blue

Why not for training?

Coming from the IT side, I find it fascinating to see that these real-world tests are employed to fine-tune autonumous guidance. I wonder how long it'll take to develop a reliable defense against these missiles... assuming such a missile comes plunging down from a parabolic trajectory and maneauvering, CIWS will be useless.... my money is on hypersonic anti-missile missiles or perhaps something more exotic. Loitering drones above a ship could do since they only have to brush the ASBM in order to disintegrate it. Railguns and lasers have been "20 years away" for about 50 years now... I just don't see energy weapons as viable in the near future.

@paulloveless9180

2 жыл бұрын

Very good analysis regarding railgun and lasers always being 20 years away.

@bathhatingcat8626

2 жыл бұрын

Aegis can shoot these down. These hypersonic missiles aren’t like the nuclear armed glide vehicles. These are ballistic missiles but need to slow down on retry to acquire a target. So their final dive isn’t much faster than an anti ship missile like granite. I think the angle these ballistic type anti ship missiles approach at is an issue for the anti missile system. I think that aegis system must be set specifically to look for ballistic missile style approaches. He said leave it to people in the comments to discuss these missiles. I’m not an expert. Here is a reading list.

@bathhatingcat8626

2 жыл бұрын

It would let me post my links. Here is a video with a good summary and reading list kzread.info/dash/bejne/pGF1tcVufLasY7g.html

@bathhatingcat8626

2 жыл бұрын

*wouldnt

@SchlawinerUSA

2 жыл бұрын

it will all come down to speed and detection.. how fast can you detect it.. i am curios about that, too.

China is still scared to death of U.S. carriers and any weapon they have to attack one they know they better not use it😂😂😂

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

And yet china must be laughing themselves to sleep every night, knowing the USA is spending itself into uncontrolled debt to fun a military that hasn't done anything positive since the 1950s 😂

Navy operates their own fleet of H6

Land based targets have little practical conversion to sea based war vessels.. how exactly are the chinese to target these if the usa clears the reconsats from orbit.. and sweeps the chinese SSK and ssns from the ocean.. prior to deployment..

@Zhujac

2 жыл бұрын

Chinese is biggest gambler. Try it to see what would happen. Juan and Japan base all in missile range.

@janwitts2688

2 жыл бұрын

@lSong Gaming I'm not American and they interfere with the running of my country.. so I'm perfectly ok for them to try it and see... The real problem for china is that Beijing is not mobile... so I expect it would be utterly destroyed along with every other ccp haven ...

@Zhujac

2 жыл бұрын

@@janwitts2688 China build thousands of mile long tunnel. Who would be stupid enough escalate to a nuclear show down over what😂😂😂. Washington is a dead landmark anyway.

@Zhujac

2 жыл бұрын

If China has financial crisis Washington should be worried. War to Taiwan is a good turnaround.

@KB4QAA

2 жыл бұрын

These targets can be used by satellites, aircraft, UAV's, missiles and aircraft carrying the missile seeker and targeting heads for R&D.

I had a friend called Marv

Since this was released operational testing of hypersonic missiles have been conducted by US which has done development on and off since the 60s. The ability to provide reliable control at hypersonic speeds for both China and Russia are limited. They are behind the R&D compared to US which has spent more time with lower altitude higher heat and steering load at high resistance/temp.

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

Given the actual level of development is no doubt highly secret. I'm not sure how you can make such a sweeping statement. Unless you work for an intelligence agency and your posting about it on the internet 😂

Hughes Aircraft made a defensive system that would jam a weapons radar, and make it seem like a US carrier was somewhere else. That was in the mid 80's, imagine what they developed as a defensive today!

I suppose practice targets should not be surprising, especially when China doesn't yet own any ships of their own that are suitable for practice. But, like most practice targets... They don't shoot back or likely employ air defenses. In the end, a virtual reality would be the most productive way to practice instead of shooting up some plywood and metal strips as though it was still WWII.

@jwickerszh

2 жыл бұрын

VR can be useful for AI training, even Tesla uses that for example, but real world testing is still very valuable.

Imagine inflatable raft decoys the size of aircraft carriers.🤔

@MadComputerScientist

2 жыл бұрын

A zeppelin-sized pool toy. That'd be fun.

@Weisior

2 жыл бұрын

With radars and radar reflectors shining like crazy, screaming "HIT ME HIT ME C'MON"

@mytube001

2 жыл бұрын

My thought exactly!

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

Imagine the noise when one pops 😂

@merafirewing6591

6 ай бұрын

​@@AdamMGTF it has to be a very loud fart when it pops.

China's DF-21D and DF-26B anti-ship ballistic missiles can attack moving aircraft carriers, and the DF-17 hypersonic ballistic missile is the latest anti-ship missile. Since the beginning of this year, China has been equipped with the YJ-21 anti-ship hypersonic missiles of the carrier type and the airborne type. Therefore, China has now been equipped with land, sea and air hypersonic ballistic missiles. Last year, the US and Western media reported that China carried out a hypersonic vehicle in low orbit in space and launched a hypersonic missile from low orbit in space. This will be China's preliminary ability to conduct hypersonic missile attacks on sea to land without dead ends in a 360-degree four-dimensional space.

@byloyuripka9624

Жыл бұрын

other militaries operate in fifth dimensional space time so theyre in a whole 'nother dimension from china as you describe............... 😃

@alsetalokin88

Жыл бұрын

good job china. may the public enemy number one of planet earth hold his peace forever. and ever. amen.

@quinndenver4075

Жыл бұрын

What is the velocity of the warhead when it hits the ship?

@eane7238

Жыл бұрын

@@quinndenver4075 nobody really knows but very fast, multiple times the speed of sound.

specific, not pacific specifically, not pacifically

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

Yes. Poking fun at a speech impediment is the hight of sophistication.

@jimmyhackers8980

Жыл бұрын

@@AdamMGTF no, it isn't.

The carrier is overhyped,they can clearly but sunk by airpower and subs!

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

They can be. Doesn't mean they will in a conflict. There is no president for this in modern warfare.

12:05 awww... :(

Just fire target for Chinese DF 17,21, 26 hypersonic antiship missiles. YJ 21 from 055 also capable to destroy American carriers 1500 km away

make more videos

China has been a huge beneficiary of globalisation, they are dependent on food and oil, any significant military action, for example taking out US assets would leave them very isolated and without the benefits of globalisation.

@jwickerszh

2 жыл бұрын

In case of WW3 the "benefits of globalisation" would be pretty much irrelevant.

@truthful3777

2 жыл бұрын

You got it wrong...They are self sustaining. They have everything in their country. They can stand alone. Bare in mind their population is 4 times the size of US and also 4 times the size of EU. They can trade among themselves.....They no need the world to trade. We buy electronic stuff to resell in my country. We buy 1000 units for a 15 million population and we have trouble selling for a year. The manufacturer sneered at us when we told them of our required quantity. They told us their local market itself can easily take 100,000 per order any time.

@liammarra4003

2 жыл бұрын

Isolated? They're the largest trading partners of most states on earth. So, unless others can pick up the slack. States may not want to do business but they won't have a damn choice. China, unlike the US, has managed the benefits of "globalization" very well. US seems pretty butt hurt about it lmao.

Just targets for practice.

Target practice.

Thank you for not talking about America or India in what we can do them what we can’t do

What if they are building arks in the desert because they are going to melt the polar ice caps?

@AdamMGTF

Жыл бұрын

Lol because china is Dr Evil now?😂 Your comment made my day

They practicing on how to sink them..

Target practice

Only the Chinese would base its information on hitting a non moving target, US Aircraft Carriers are hardly ever stationary

@1001001a

2 жыл бұрын

watch the video carefully

@msytdc1577

2 жыл бұрын

If all they are doing is testing the ability for sensors to be able to penetrate any plasma and be able to identify targets then moving targets is not relevant to that sub-system validation, you first need to retire such critical path technological risk before moving on to further, more realistic testing scenarios.

Why do you keep telling us whether the video is unscripted or not?

I see 🤔 How convenient Land based ships with their anchors dropped and totally peaceful as I don’t suppose they will shoot back ……

Training target

@HISuttonCovertShores >>> 👍👍

Why don't they use the 003 for target practice? It's also an empty shell that is of similar size and shape of U.S. carriers. The 003 will end up at the bottom of the ocean anyways. At least this way, they will get some use out of it before it sinks.

Idk mang, _...*hic!*_ 'tlooks like a big ol' bottle to me 🍾 ... or possibly a giant middle-finger. :thonk: 🤔

nothing new here.

Only question about Kinzhal is if it can hit a manuvering carrier. I think its unwise to under estimate the Russians in this respect....Clearly they've taken supremacy with missiles....The S-400 is unmatched....while we were playing and upgrading modern tech, Russia decided to take it to the next level.....these weapons have changed the world, we're the only ones who dont it yet! We wont see it until one of our carriers is sitting on the bottom....Putin said our carriers could be neutralised in 30 minutes.......There is a reason Russia never tried to compete with us in the regard...they huge vulnerable bullseues on a flat featureless plain....and bere we are not evan capable of reciprocating in kind...

Wouldn't a hypersonic vehicle have trouble employing other sensors like IR and optical? The vehicle would have to slow down in order to deploy sensors beyond it's heatshield or eject part or the shield in order to actually "see" anything. The aerodynamic heating at lower altitudes will he a huge problem for such weapons unless they slow to speeds that aren't that much of a problem for missile defenses. Unless...they're intending another sensor platform will give the glide vehicles updated targeting information? Maybe these mock-ups are not for terminal guidance testing of actual weapons but instead to improve the targeting platforms ability to find & track the carrier? 🤔