This is precisely the kind of video I like to see! I love seeing people who are genuinely passionate about something, showing why it is beautiful and important. Really enjoyed this, well done. And good job to the post-production guys. The music choices in particular were subtle while really matching the tone of the content.

@BBCEarthScience

10 жыл бұрын

So pleased you liked it MouseAndShiraz ! We've been going into more depth with our latest videos, and each of the team talk about the areas of science they genuinely love. Great to know you see their passion as we do : )

Probably the best Head Squeeze video in a while. I think symmetries would make a good video on their own, because there is a lot to say about them.

As many have already pointed out, the question of the true origin was left untouched. Referencing a model of the universe that describes our expansion from a singularity brings us to a cosmic beginning, but leaves us with the original question. I think a good and a safe answer is that a transcendent cause brought energy into existence which is modest and is supported by the big bang theory.

@LordNygma

10 жыл бұрын

The only problem is why and how...

@11derekknotek

10 жыл бұрын

LordNygma Well those are two good questions but we wouldn't need answers to them in order to think that a transcendent cause brought energy into existence, so I wouldn't call them problems.

@alligatortimshoaly1980

10 жыл бұрын

lol Derek K thinkis is sientest. HA HA

@11derekknotek

10 жыл бұрын

dlanders07 Pardon?

@alligatortimshoaly1980

10 жыл бұрын

Derek K U no real sientist just pretend.

Loved this. More of Martin please :)

Best video yet i've seen on headsqueeze! Reading up on Emmy Noether, amazing woman!

@BBCEarthScience

10 жыл бұрын

That's great that you went away to do your own research, there's another Noether fan in the world!

@loytoycommissiong4162

3 жыл бұрын

There was no Big Bang

Fantastic video Martin! I love the beautiful simplicity of science as it approaches the mechanics of the universe!

The energy concept literally blowed my mind untill I found this video..! Thanks for this video🙏

Excellent video sir! The answer to the last question is absolutely amazing.

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it.

Does the motion of atomic particles inside a black hole slow down or even stop?

if the alws of physics were the same in an accelerating reference frame what conserved quantity would pop up then?

... was it not Einstien that said he preferred to leave elegance to his tailor?

what did you mean by "the symmetries of nature"?

I'd now like a) more discussion on theories of energy pre-big-bang, and b) entropy particularly as it relates to heat. This was a very good introduction.

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

There is no before the Big Bang, it was the beginning of both space and time.

@acchaladka

10 жыл бұрын

Martin Archer Thanks for the response Martin and fair enough: obviously I've never been satisfied with that aspect of Big Bang Theory. It's a scientist's way of saying 'we don't (or can't) know', which is a fine response, but no fun. I'd enjoy some random guesses and theories. Otherwise it seems we haven't really answered the question of where energy comes from.

Laws of physics is still changing as we get more knowledges about how nature operate. I.e. gravity we knew decades ago turn out corrected with the recent knowledge.

I think energy is everything that is physically inside and around you

How does symmetry prevent energy from being created or destroyed? Can't the symmetry be extended to create more energy since spacetime is also increasing?

@djow314

10 жыл бұрын

I'm afraid if you want an answer to this you will have to study some very advanced mathematics, and learn the proof of Noether's theorem.

It's hard to imagine a universe without energy.

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

Indeed!

@schmittelt

10 жыл бұрын

The act of imagining is it's own energy.

Video starts at 4:02

thank you so much i no more

Does wall is a potential energy ?? And does energy can be used up ??

@pendejo6466

5 жыл бұрын

The fuck?

4:57 Trigger Warning

Headsqueeze consider my question: What are P-branes or Supersymmetry? I struggle a lot when reading such papers in the Arxiv

4:41 omg 😆

This question has bothered me for so long. *Is there a process that changes heat energy?* from what I have been told, the sun, for example, releases multiple types of energy. Among them is heat energy. I've never heard of an example of heat energy changing to any other type of energy. According to this video, heat energy is kinetic energy, so does that mean that the heat just naturally becomes potential energy because kinetic energy becomes potential (and a few others), right.....? But what kind of potential energy would heat become if it does change into potential energy? And if it does not change to potential, *What does heat change to?*

@Yous0147

10 жыл бұрын

Heat, as far as I know, is described as being a form of kinetic energy. In practical use today, heat is usually used to generate things like electricity via mechanical movement of e.g. a turbine which generates mechanical energy (which is also kinetic energy). The principle is the same as with steam engines, where the heat in form of steam leads to movement of the mechanical parts. This can f.ex. make the wheels of a train move, since the heat energy is converted to mechanical energy. If you're asking where heat goes to in general, it's somewhat simple as well. As you might know, scientists today believe (to my knowledge) that heat (a lot of energy) is when small molecules vibrate, and cold (less or no energy) is the absence of vibration. When something is hot, the molecules that that something is made of is vibrating intensely. If that something is surrounded by cold, less-vibrating molecules, the two kinds of molecules will bump into each other and even out the vibrations, which leads to the heat being evened out as well. So the vibration of the something hot will go down while the vibrations on the cold will go up, making the temperture evn all-around over time. That's the principle of it, though the time it takes for it to happen depends on various factors. Atleast that's how the theory goes about heat.

@MattKChannel

10 жыл бұрын

Yous0147 Ah ok, so the heated molecules transfer the heat to molecules around them. So my next question is: is the amount of heat energy out there increasing? Is the heat energy in the universe changing to mechanical energy or non-kinetic energy faster than the heat energy in the universe is being created? And if not, then does that mean that the universe is heating up? And where does the universe continue to get the energy to expand? is it momentum created by the big bang? I know I'm asking a lot of questions, but they are why I sometimes doubt the law of conservation of energy and that really bothers me a lot.

cool video, Martin (:

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

Thanks :D

I still haven't got my answer where did energy come from ? If energy can't be created now then how it was created at the big bang ? Who created it ?

@JasonNapalm72

4 жыл бұрын

Rohit Mahmud God, Energy has always existed, the spirit realm and spirits are made of several types of energy, infrared, electromagnetic, gamma radiation, electricity, light and thermal.

My view of energy is just as an abstract idea that makes it easier to solve problems in physics. It's almost like how they went to magic to explain certain events or divine intervention back in the "ancient days". Energy is a very convenient explanation on how everything works in the universe. Furthermore, I believe even with all of our discoveries and inventions, we know not much more about the universe as we think we do. Back in Greek times, they believe the gods controlled everything. Why the sun rises, and so forth. It was convenient for them. If you whammy back to that time and said what we believe, they would think idiots of us. I believe the same holds true today. If people came from the year 3000 to visit us and told us how the universe "actually works", we would think idiots of them. This may be man's biggest flaw, the inability to let go of an idea or to explore other paths. It's easier to blindly accept we are right than to accept we may be wrong. So for what is energy? I believe it is an abstract idea that is convenient for our time on how we perceive the world. I also believe there is a greater truth that we have not found yet. So I will accept this explanation of energy as a "tool" for what we require energy to be, but I will also be ready to throw this idea out the window when a "better" idea comes.

@MrBOBhakimipendobombies

3 жыл бұрын

MagicOfDark dafuq bro u okay?

@ubermenschexplorer4910

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, that’s a neat and safe way to put it.

@Insightful_Truth

3 жыл бұрын

Energy is not an abstract idea. It's real transferable entity

What is antimatter?

if the energy is conserved then where does the energy of big bang came from? please answer my question.

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

Since the concepts of space and time came into existence at the moment of the Big Bang, then all energy must have originated then as well. There is no "before" the Big Bang and due to energy conservation, the energy can't have been created at any time after the Big Bang. Ergo it all came from the creation of the Universe itself as we understand it.

@malekghali8405

10 жыл бұрын

but then this doesn't explain my question, and the theory of energy is still not applied on this if the energy was created due to the big bang then how?. the creator of the big bang?

Great Video! I really like that someone actually tried to explain what energy is and not just talk about all the different forms of energy. I find the fact that something so basic and simple is still so mysterious and unknown to be truly amazing.

Either this video is insanely kickass or I'm a bit too baked.

Reminder, we cannot depend or accept theory for what it is, I would say it just a guidance for us. But we should figure ourselves whether it is true and how will you debate your answer and how will you prove you are right. Let’s say the quadratic formula, do you just accept for what the school teaches or being told or you will go deeper in your own hands how it began and understand how it created in the first place.

6:45 NO! Higgs bosons are NOT the cause of mass! 1) Almost all of the mass in an atom is mass that comes from their energy via E=mc², not from the higgs field. The protons and neutrons get their mass from the energy stored in the quarks (rough description, not 100% true, but that's the gist of it). Only the electrons in your body get their mass from the higgs field. 2) The origin of mass for some particles (such as, like I just mentioned, electrons) comes from the higgs *field* - not from Higgs bosons. The bosons were discovered quite recently, which then confirmed the existance of the Higgs field. The bosons aren't the things that give other particles mass. Edit: This video explains this really well (it's exactly about this same topic): Your Mass is NOT From the Higgs Boson

@blacklyfe5543

7 жыл бұрын

joeytje50 mass does come from the Higgs boson

@seri4832

5 жыл бұрын

1. I think therefore I AM. Something exists. 2. Something cannot come from nothing. 3. There is something. 4. Since there is something and something cannot come from nothing, nothing never existed, if it did then there still would be nothing. (i) something comes something, (ii) from nothing comes nothing. Therefore since existence is, the (ii) premise must be true. 5. Energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Therefore, it could have no beginning, if it did it would imply it was created. 6. Energy must always have existed. 7. Energy is eternal. 8. Everything is energy. 9. Living thing arise from energy which is evident, therefore life has a chance of arising from energy. 10. If it did once, then in an infinite world, it can do infinite times so it has done infinite times, is doing and will do infinite times. ( Also research "Eternal Return" and "Cyclic Model theory of the Universe" ) ( NOTE : I am not saying I am completely right, just alternate theory rather than the Big Bang and I am not implying it's equal or superior to it, just inferior but something to hypothesize, that's because we don't know the absolute truth, therefore hypothesizing is all we can do. )

1:50 that would be temperature I guess

Cool to think that no one sill know what is gravitation or energi.

What happened to James May's Q&A?

@arduria538

10 жыл бұрын

I was just thinking this as well! :D I miss James, please bring him back!

And another thing, you can read long articles on this subject, type in eternal-ness or eternity or infinity or watch videos and in away you may waste your time, you can understand this subject just the way I explained it below, and all in less then a paragraph.

But big bang still not the only theory about the origin of universe though. So yeah in my opinion how the energy originate is still a mystery (still not conclusive).

Aren't squares symmetrical every 45°?

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

Sorry, no. Take a normal square □ and rotate it by 45°. It now looks like ♢ (bit like a diamond) which definitely is different. However, if you'd rotated by 90° then it'd look exactly the same □. Therefore, squares are rotationally symmetric only for multiples of 90°.

Photon is a package of energy. What exactly exactly is this energy?

*I Do Vlogs every Friday that are sure to make you smile. If you have time or need a laugh go check them out out! Im sorry and I won’t bother you guys anymore. I really do appreciate it!*

I enjoyed the video, but I am a little puzzled. What does he mean by 'nature'? My concept of nature is limited to trees, animals, rocks, mountains, etc. Basically anything that wasn't man-made. I am incapable of corresponding the existence of energy with oaks, or brushes. Not trying to be narrow-minded here, but please feel free to clarify my view of 'nature' so that I can understand the explanation better.

@DinosaurFromFuture

10 жыл бұрын

Nature = the Universe

What about Chinese and Indian history on energy

where does the energy of human to do things like work and hobby come from?

@Insightful_Truth

3 жыл бұрын

Chemistry in body

gravitational energy.. I assume it was created in the big bang, but it's hard to wrap my mind around the mechanism by which it's created, even in the colloquial sense. is it just a quirk of the expansion of the universe? things don't like the distance of space between them so they're drawn together over infinite space relative to their mass?

Kudos to you for talking about Emmy Noether. Spoilers: at the cosmological scale, energy is not conserved. Light redshifts due to the accelerated expansion of the Universe and looses energy by the time it reaches other galaxies. Without knowledge of Dark Energy we simply don't know if energy is conserved overall, and in fact energy conservation is dubious in GR itself, where symmetries are space-time-dependent. Just sayin'.

@DrMartinArcher

9 жыл бұрын

You're entirely right, General Relativity allows for energy to not be conserved over cosmological scales due to curved space-times. But GR says that locally we can always treat space-time as a tangent plane and that's why energy is conserved on our more familiar smaller scales. Whether energy is conserved across the entire Universe is really unknown! A complex but interesting point.

You'd think of people really Like this video they would have either stopped watching it or watched another one,hell Why not both. If you entertain the thought of watching a Video to enjoy it, what is the purpose to your life? Aside from trying to down someone's passion great job mr. Archer I enjoyed this video and its faniliar references especially the inception one

But wait...The laws of physics only exist, because energy exist. Does that not mean that something strange must have occured, before the big bang, to make that big bang possible? If so, then you cannot destroy or create energy with energy. Does that mean, in order to create or destroy energy you will need to know what happened before and during the big bang?

@andromedadelux

7 жыл бұрын

I would imagine....that since you can't use energy to create energy, given the fact that you would need to find out what happened before the big bang, the fact that there is a possible "before" means that energy can be created. But not using energy to do so. Thats the most I could extrapolate from your point.

I meant to say possibilities. Also, I meant everything that exist has always existed in terms of 'elements'

Could also be construed as where does electricity come from.

@lycaonpictus4433

4 жыл бұрын

Electricity is movement of electrons , move electrons you have electricity

The thing the i wonder is if this guy likes the show archer

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

I love the show. Danger Zone!

Our current physics can only explain things after the big bang. What was before the big bang and who triggered this big explosion? Also who triggered the other thing that triggered the big bang and so on. So for me we can't know anything what was happened before the big bang.

Ok so if energy is an abstract concept. Why has it been used so extensively throughout science? And how is it proved that it does, in fact, exist?

So in a very vague way of expressing what you're basically saying everything is the way it is because thats the way it is. They symmetry seems expressed as a closed loop answer to the question in that there is no other way things could be because that's the way they are and.always have been and would be if it all begun again.

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

Not really, you can do a thought experiment imagining Universes with different symmetries and then via Noether's theorem work out what the consequences would be. For instance, a 1-dimensional Universe could have no concept of angular momentum but momentum could exist as long as translation was a symmetry. Basically, the argument isn't circular and it's a bit like the anthropic principle.

My energy comes from the power socket...

Energy is conserved iff Laws of nature are symmetric under time.

q: where does energy come from a: carbs sugar and i think protein

@ChaseEvers172

10 жыл бұрын

oh ok i didn't know that

God. Only answer.

@Lets_talk_about_that

8 жыл бұрын

+Sona Aghazaryan yup - faith.

@AliMohamed-mk6hl

7 жыл бұрын

Hailee Wilkinson What God But?

@christiantemple7403

7 жыл бұрын

+Ali Mohamed learn proper english

@ahmedaghadi8281

5 жыл бұрын

@Flowerboy3008 there is no proof of big bang theory, yet many or most belives. Why? Why some r poor or some r rich. Why some gets problem some not. Think a child born in beggar's family and a chil born in one of the word richest family? Why this partiality? Who is doing this partiality? Nature? Who is nature? Here comes the term "GOD" one who has created everything? Then who created him? Hah. He is the one who has created everything therefore creator can't be a creation. Confused? Ohk for example :- how many numbers are there? Infinite. What is 1 + infinte? Not possible. What is next integer infinte? Undefined? Hah our brain has a limit. We can't think beyond a limit. Our past theories get proved wrong and new theory comes. How can our brain understand what and god is? But god show signs. Yes he show. There r plenty of more questions. There r plent of religious books. Find the book which is pure and the book which u can get in pure form. Check the book not the follower of that religion. There blackships on the religions. And don't get misinterpreted of that books by others. Ohk this is just starting. *"Every soul will taste death"*

@seri4832

5 жыл бұрын

1. I think therefore I AM. Something exists. 2. Something cannot come from nothing. 3. There is something. 4. Since there is something and something cannot come from nothing, nothing never existed, if it did then there still would be nothing. (i) something comes something, (ii) from nothing comes nothing. Therefore since existence is, the (ii) premise must be true. 5. Energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Therefore, it could have no beginning, if it did it would imply it was created. 6. Energy must always have existed. 7. Energy is eternal. 8. Everything is energy. 9. Living thing arise from energy which is evident, therefore life has a chance of arising from energy. 10. If it did once, then in an infinite world, it can do infinite times so it has done infinite times, is doing and will do infinite times. ( Also research "Eternal Return" and "Cyclic Model theory of the Universe" ) ( NOTE : I am not saying I am completely right, just alternate theory rather than the Big Bang and I am not implying it's equal or superior to it, just inferior but something to hypothesize, that's because we don't know the absolute truth, therefore hypothesizing is all we can do. )

Hello!!! Matter IS energy! You might as well ask "Where did reality come from?" In my estimation, all energy consciousness, and so therefore is matter. That is an arguable position, but has no chance of being proven correct or incorrect now or in any foreseeable future.

@jaymacone

10 жыл бұрын

I meant to say "all energy IS consciousness"

Where does magical energy come from?

@lemonslice2233

10 жыл бұрын

Unicorns.

@bawl-hart8361

10 жыл бұрын

LemonSlice This explains why there isn't magic anymore, stupid Voldemort killed the last unicorn!

Assumptions... BB is a theory. Things are tied together for a reason though. No doubt. Even if BB happened, what happened before that? So yet again, we say that we are the center of the universe?

@bonvivant55

10 жыл бұрын

Brilliant reply.

@timmah508

10 жыл бұрын

Tom PTI it seems, at least to me, from the multiverse theory that time could exist before our universe was born

***** How do we interpret intelligence? And by that interpretation who is more intelligent a human male or a human female? Should be presented be James May

So where did the big bang come from?

@DrMartinArcher

9 жыл бұрын

That's a question we really can't answer still. I've got an interactive BBC video on this coming soon!

we can try and use technology and words and mathematics to try and understand why and how energy is there but at the end of the day we don't know shit

I understand most of it until he talks about the symmetry thing which is kinda confusing

Theists need to debunk the Law of thermodynamics. You know they cannot.

Y U NO GIVE ANSWER THAT I UNDERSTAND ?

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

What did you struggle with?

Energy didn't originally come from the big bang. The big bang was already pure energy.

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

They're essentially the same point. All the energy we see now originated in the Big Bang, the moment of creation when space-time and matter began.

@Anthraxinternational

10 жыл бұрын

Martin Archer The big bang was the implosion that released the already existing compact energy. Not where it originated from.That we do not know, yet.

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

Anthraxinternational What you describe is not the general scientific consensus on the Big Bang.

Why do puffer fish hide from me?

All of these are natural processes (including big bang) but if you keep on going backwards, everything should come from a single point and God created the point. God is the owner of nature. No matter what science keeps on proving,the origin will remain mystery. The only phenomenon that has no beginning and end is God(The creator of the big bang,the creator of nature)

How can something come from nothing which is the Big Bang.

a more interesting question is... if there is a Creator who created energy why won't He allow us to create energy? the answer is simple. because then we might be able to destroy everything

Search "magnetic energy". Search "Free energy magnet motor fan used as free energy generator free energy light bulb." The guy can make a computer fan spin with magents and light a light bulb. Now the fan spins faster when using a battery as he shows, but it really does work. No pollution. Koch brother bots please reply.

Aristotle 4th century? Seriously?

symetry...matter/antimatter...ying/yang?...always wonderd if physical finds its way into philosophy...and visa versa...

At :53. "Concept came from Aristotle in the 4th century". Really? Because Aristotle died 800 years before the 4th century. When doing an educational video please proofread before publishing.

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

Apologies, I forgot to say BC.

Why do our bowels make noises?

Sooooo.....if energy can't be created or destroyed....where was all this energy that now exists before the "big bang"?............

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

There is no "before" the Big Bang, it was the beginning of both space and time.

Sound very good up until the point you start talking quantum physics, laws are out of the door then. Hope science will give clearer answers soon.

Easy it comes from the creator

Hi, it's me from this channel back when it was HeadSqueeze. Anyway, I'm now making videos on my own channel, so maybe you'd like to check them out?

Umm, is it me, or did he not explain anything? Yes, he used all the jargon in a very convincing manner, and yet, explained nothing. I hate these popular "science" youtube channels.

@naaj100

10 жыл бұрын

No offence but I think you didn't understand what he said mate. My mind was actually blown by watching this video. The last idea of energy being natures symmetry over time was very new to me. Explains a lot.

@LumieX

9 жыл бұрын

JohnVrSo No, particlelight is right. This guy did not explain much of anything really. He says energy cannot be created and yet was somehow created during the big bang but doesn't explain how. If energy can't be created then how could the big bang have created? He completely contradicts himself without explaining how it's possible.

@naaj100

9 жыл бұрын

LumieX The problem there is that nobody actually knows how or why the Bing Bang happened. So, he can't actually explain that.

@LumieX

9 жыл бұрын

JohnVrSo If he can't explain it then he shouldn't be proclaiming it as truth. He clearly states "it must have originated with the beginning of time itself, the big bang". So he's basically saying that energy began to exist which means it was created which is a clear contradiction to the Law of Conservation of Energy. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. He makes an extraordinary claim and gives literally no evidence to support it. Hardly science if you ask me.

@VJsubstanceJ

9 жыл бұрын

LumieX The last point is basically stating that we've been looking at it the wrong way. What we perceive as energy is not a force acting on an object, but the only possible way an object can behave. In other words, energy is not an "activity" or "operation" at all. It's just the opposite, a constraint, given by a universe that is perfectly symmetrical over time.

Energy Come's From My Music.

Lol

This video is amazing (save the Aristotle flub). To all you posters that don't get it yet.: Martin Archer is telling you directly what energy is and where it came from. The symmetry explanation is as good as it gets in a short video in an everyday sort of way- The definition of energy is often described as the "Capacity to do work". This description is precise yet boring for all that are looking for a 15 second Pop answer. Martin Archer is trying HARD to take you beyond the dry definition of energy that I just quoted. He is bold in his presentation because it requires maths, yet Martin is not underestimating YOUR intelligence by "dumbing it down". Follow him.

@DFPercush

10 жыл бұрын

Martin Archer I would love to see a video on how the age of the universe was calculated. I never took the physics course where you do that, but I've heard from people who have. They couldn't really explain it very well though. Forgive me if you've already done it, quick search didn't have any luck. Anyway, great channel, found you on KZread's "you might like..." suggestions. Subbing for sure.

@DFPercush

10 жыл бұрын

Main Frame In your original post "Since it is pretty certain that energy didnt start with the big bang," I believe you are committing the logical fallacy of begging the question. As Martin so graciously tried to explain to you, your question is invalid and shows a lack of understanding of the theory. The concept of "before" requires time to exist. The big bang theory rests on the premise that time itself is finite. If you have an alternate theory, have a go at it, but that's not what we're talking about here. Now stop being a prick to people who are trying to help you, it's shameful.

So where did energy come from?

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

There are three answers in the video, depending on your interpretation of the question. I'm guessing you mean where did it physically come from, to which I say it must have come from the Big Bang. Why the Big Bang happened and why our Universe exists at all is a whole other question to which we don't really know the answer.

@Zitapis13

10 жыл бұрын

I was almost sure that i would get this answer from the video before even clicking it. Dissapointing...

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

zitapis zitapiss We do way more than just that in the video. Not only is there the history of the concept, but also Noether's theorem on why energy exists at all.

God is energy that's why it cannot be destroyed or created

idear lmao

Can anyone solve this : I am 370Km away from you I can look upwards and downwards , I can weigh one million pounds, I contain six people inside of me , I can read speeds of 7.7Km/ ) It would be deeply helpful if anyone knew what this is

@DrMartinArcher

10 жыл бұрын

That is surely the International Space Station

THE SUN , THE END

Simetys of nature🤣

@liutasuk

4 жыл бұрын

How about what is nature ?

Here people, I'm a philosopher, I'll explain this subject, BEHOlD! lol. For the people here that say he didn't explain anything, they're right, and neither did that Mathematician lady, the problem is we're applying mundane logic to the depths of forever, which it's not a matter of, instead, it's a matter of acceptance, to accept eternal-ness, therefore entropy maybe or should not be what we think it is, also, to accept that there will never be an answer to this question other then accept eternal-ness. Everything that every exist has always existed, right? To think otherwise just doesn't make sense, at least not based on the way things are. In addition to that if eternal-ness is real, then possibility are endless. This is why I believe in a God and in Pantheism and I believe that God believes in Pantheism. I really don't think there no room for Atheism, instead the best Atheist can do is take the word God and call it intelligent force, however, that intelligent force governs the Universe, so, there is Governance, yet, like I said possibility are endless, and within the Universe exist procreation, evolution or shape shifting, then there's dark matter, yeah, the Universe is alive. I could say more, but that should be good enough.

GOD.

Y’all theories is wack! Energy isssssss BLACK! 😂 you learn something new everyday. You’re alllll welcome

Like if you're here because of Alcohology Spaceship.....

окодкго

creationists should watch this, they think it's all magic..

@ukulelemike

10 жыл бұрын

I watched it, and found his answer completely avoiding the question. In one place he admits that energy is neither created nor destroyed, then says it MUSt have been created at the big bang. Which the laws of nature say could not be the case.

@7xXx666xXx7

10 жыл бұрын

ukulelemike Well essentially if there is no time before the big bang, the energy was never "created". it just existed from the beginning.

@malekghali8405

10 жыл бұрын

no, nothing is magic.. but if the energy is conserved, then according to science where does the energy of the big bang came from? above scientific source?

There were no answers in this video of any kind other than the historical information he gave.

Did God created Everything? Everything is energy. Energy cannot be Created. This tells us, God Created Nothing.

BTW. There is more current physical evidence for an intelligent universe than a universe that "banged" into existence from nothing. That whole idea is ridiculous. If all matter/energy existed in time and must be conserved, then it could have never been less than what it is or will be in a time construct. The Creationist are probable on a better path than the so-called scientific establishment. You have to respect those brave pioneering scientists who use the scientific method and stand by their results, despite tremendous social pressure from the academic community to conform.