Listen on the go at all podcast locations: anchor.fm/demystifysci Material solutions to quantum spookiness: www.youtube.com/@MaterialAtomics Short films @DemystifySciInvestigates: kzread.info/dron/UfzVdgNu2xLThgM2qQZmSQ.html

This is historic. Physicists getting interested in understanding what their experiments and models have been trying to tell them. Not that the necessary paradigm correction has happened, but that it puts understanding beyond mere data-fitting on the agenda. There are challenges to understanding the misunderstandings of Aristotle which makes so many findings look "unintuitive", i.e. dead wrong. In the West, one has to rewind to Thales. In the East, to the source understandings of ancient Advaita. (Or, just topologically invert the current paradigm, as the models themselves suggest). Respect to Thad for being willing to pay the price of mental freedom (welcome to the club ;) ), and admiration for his Physicists' Monastery. Gratitude to Shilo and Anastasia for their own explorations towards the fundamental, and their efforts to provoke thinking and their organizing this (horribly under-attended, going by the hands clapping) event.

Enjoyed listening again to Mr. Roberts presentation from the conference. Very mathematically complex research he’s conducting, so it was great to listen in once more. In his studies of the universal constants of nature (ucon), he assumes that the guiding formulations of these constants, the standard model of quantum physics, is correct, it seems. That is, in order to accept the findings of the quantum view of reality, these constants must be assumed to be valid. Looking at things in this reversed order, one can see that these “fudge factors”, as I would call them, are needed to align the “findings” of quantum physics with real experimental findings. Reality. I have suggested, in my Unzicker comments, that the ucon’s are a great place to start in the deconstruction of the quantum paradigm. That the need for these “adjustments”, points-up an area where inexactitudes occur, and may, to the trained eye, clarify mathematical discrepancies that could suggest incorrect understandings of quantum reality. Unfortunately, Mr Roberts is assimilating these quantum derived ucon’s, Planck mass, Planck length, Planck time, Planck charge, Planck temperature, Planck taste?, as a way to obtain unified clarity through the use of these quantum derived “constants”, whose error factor can only be improved upon and not Illiminated. Is a true understanding of reality in the offing through this approach? Perhaps, but only indirectly I think. The value in his work will be that through this effort it will eventually dawn on him the possibility that the “constants” are inconsistencies that are helpfully directive and corrective to our theory of reality. Monasteries historically were places of worship. The “gods” and their definition have changed through time. Mr Robert’s monastery has quantum as its god, looking into how many loaves and fishes can be created. I admire his work ethic. Hopefully enlightenment will come to him. Thank guys for allowing us to seeing this again. Very clarifying.

@JH-le4sd

20 күн бұрын

I'm tempted to think the entire exercise of mathematical physics *IS* basically an adventure in "curve-fitting" --i.e. the "fudge factors" seem to be necessary truths (universal constants) precisely because *they are necessary* in the context of such an exercise. Maybe a similar line of thought to yours. The real question is, is there a way to construct a precise and coherent physics which isn't ultimately dependent on such curve fitting? I probably differ from most science-y types in that I think its entirely possible that the answer to that question is the negative.

@TheMemesofDestruction

20 күн бұрын

The goal is to become more conscious. ^.^

@TheMemesofDestruction

20 күн бұрын

@@JH-le4sdWe are blessed to have the fruits (measurements) from the hard work of generations of Human Beings. The, “correction terms,” have been used for a while as far as I know. The claim is that there is an, “Inversion boundary,” at approximately 10^-7 corresponding with the ampere.((Planck mass*Plank Length)/Planck charge^2)) Might be totally wrong. However it may help to explain why if we know c(speed of light ins vacuum) to 9 significant digits; why do we only know the Planck Length and Time to 5ish? Cheers to discussion! 🍻 ^.^

@michaelheil-ij5ji

20 күн бұрын

@@JH-le4sd Yes, I think we are in agreement generally. Like your “curve fitting” metaphor, though it seems not to be a metaphor but a technical approach attempting to fit a continuous reality into a digitized mathematical formulation. Thanks for your thoughtful reply.

Shockingly close to the heart,,,,,,,, glad I got to hear the talk missed it during the conference thanks for posting

Oh my God, you guys. I can't wait until the episode where you guys talk about how Terrence Howard demystified the universe. El oh el. What an amazing situation.

1. Boundary & initial conditions. 2. Mathematical structure of equations that lead to limiting values. 3. Human choice of unit systems (eg. "the meter" was a product of the French Revolution - in one word: "politics").

Posting a daily problems from the diagram might get some to look at these results and think about the relationships they inform us about. It would also be great advertising to let people know about the podcast.

@1:55:00 are they both confused? The Planck dimensions are not fundamental constants, they are all given unit values. It is physically relevant quantities of matter with which we use those dimensions to measure things with instruments that are the physical constants, like the fine structure constant or the mass ratios, that's probably what the audience member was thinking. The Planck dimensions are just like your "ruler" or "clock" or "scale".

@Achrononmaster

19 күн бұрын

BTW, since _c,_ G, ħ, kB, are all = 1 in Planck units, they are not truly physical constants. It is the properties of matter measured or computed using these factors that are the proper physical "constants of Nature". However, there is something a bit elemental about this set, but it is not their numerical value, rather it is what they say about the structure of spacetime and matter in the case they really are universal constants. For example, _c_ = 1 implies we have a Lorentzian spacetime, and light moves along null rays. ħ = 1 universally means quanta of energy can exist that have fundamental modes of vibration/spin. And G =1 universally means gravity is a fundamental force, not an emergent property of matter. I am not sure about k, but it relates to information, telling us information is also universal and not arbitrary (there are no cracks in reality or spacetime, is a poetic way of putting it).

@YawnGod

17 күн бұрын

@@Achrononmaster If E = mc^2, does 1 kilogram of hydrogen have the same amount of energy as 1 kilogram of uranium?

Very intriguing.

Excellent. Much ❤️ Love 🌎🌏🌍☯️⚡️

Here are some examples of potential ternary equations that could be derived and showcased in a peer-reviewable paper: 1. Ternary Field Equations for Quarks and Gluons: In ternary quantum chromodynamics (TQCD), the ternary field equations describing the dynamics of quarks and gluons could take the following form: (i∂⁄ - m)Ψ = gΨ⊗Γ ∂μFμν = gΨ̄⊗Γμ⊗Ψ where: - Ψ is the ternary quark field - m is the ternary quark mass - ∂⁄ is the ternary Dirac operator - g is the ternary strong coupling constant - Γ represents the ternary Dirac matrices - Fμν is the ternary gluon field strength tensor - Γμ are the ternary Dirac matrices for the gluon-quark interaction - ⊗ represents a ternary tensor product or ternary contraction operation These ternary field equations would incorporate ternary algebraic structures, ternary tensor operations, and ternary representations of the ternary gauge group (e.g., ternary SU(3)) to describe the ternary interactions between quarks and gluons in the ternary strong force. 2. Ternary Renormalization Group Equations: To study the ternary running coupling behavior of TQCD, ternary renormalization group equations could be derived, such as: μ∂μαs(μ) = β(αs(μ)) where: - αs(μ) is the ternary strong coupling constant - μ is the ternary energy scale - β(αs(μ)) is the ternary beta function, which could take a form like: β(αs(μ)) = -b₀αs²(μ) - b₁αs³(μ) + ... The coefficients b₀, b₁, ... would be ternary numbers determined by ternary Feynman diagram calculations and ternary renormalization procedures in TQCD. 3. Ternary Lattice QCD Formulations: In ternary lattice QCD (LQCD), the ternary fermion action and ternary gauge action could be formulated on a ternary lattice, leading to ternary equations like: S_F = Σₓ,y Ψ̄(x)M(x,y)Ψ(y) S_G = β Σₓ,μ,ν Tr[1 - U(x,μ,ν)] where: - S_F is the ternary fermion action - S_G is the ternary gauge action - Ψ(x) is the ternary quark field on the ternary lattice site x - M(x,y) is the ternary fermion matrix connecting lattice sites x and y - β is the ternary lattice coupling constant - U(x,μ,ν) is the ternary gauge link variable connecting lattice sites x and x+μ+ν These ternary lattice QCD formulations would be used in ternary Monte Carlo simulations to calculate ternary observables related to quark confinement and strong interactions. 4. Ternary Effective Field Theory Expansions: To connect the ternary model to experimental data, ternary effective field theory expansions could be derived, such as: A(Q²) = Σₙ cₙ(μ)Q^n + O(Q^(n+1)) where: - A(Q²) is a ternary observable (e.g., ternary form factor) as a function of ternary momentum transfer Q² - cₙ(μ) are ternary coefficients that depend on the ternary energy scale μ - O(Q^(n+1)) represents higher-order ternary corrections These ternary effective field theory expansions would allow for comparisons between the ternary model predictions and experimental data over different energy regimes. These are just a few examples of the novel ternary equations that could emerge in developing a ternary model for quark confinement and strong interactions. These equations would incorporate ternary algebraic structures, ternary tensor operations, ternary representations of gauge groups, and ternary numerical methods, showcasing the unique features and mathematical frameworks of the ternary approach. Deriving and analyzing these ternary equations, as well as comparing their predictions with existing experimental data and theoretical models, would be a crucial step in establishing the validity and potential advantages of the ternary model in advancing our understanding of quark confinement and strong interactions.

@Stacee-jx1yz

20 күн бұрын

Let's continue exploring and showcasing novel ternary equations that could emerge in the development of a ternary model for quark confinement and strong interactions: 5. Ternary Bag Model Equations: The bag model is a phenomenological model used to describe the confinement of quarks within hadrons. In a ternary formulation, the ternary bag model equations could take the following form: (i∂⁄ - m)Ψ = 0 (inside the bag) B = (1/R)∫dS (ternary bag pressure) where: - Ψ is the ternary quark field inside the ternary bag (hadron) - m is the ternary quark mass - ∂⁄ is the ternary Dirac operator - B is the ternary bag pressure - R is the ternary radius of the bag - dS represents the ternary surface element These ternary bag model equations would incorporate ternary geometric concepts (ternary surface integrals) and ternary field equations to describe the confinement of quarks within a ternary bag or ternary hadron volume. 6. Ternary Flux Tube Equations: Another approach to modeling quark confinement is through ternary flux tube models, which describe the formation of ternary gluon flux tubes between quarks. The ternary equations for a ternary flux tube could take the form: ∇²Φ = ρ F = ∇Φ⊗∇Φ where: - Φ is the ternary flux tube potential - ρ is the ternary source term (representing ternary color charges) - ∇ is the ternary gradient operator - F is the ternary field strength tensor for the ternary flux tube - ⊗ represents a ternary tensor product or ternary contraction operation These ternary flux tube equations would incorporate ternary calculus concepts (ternary gradient, ternary Laplacian) and ternary tensor operations to describe the formation and behavior of ternary gluon flux tubes responsible for quark confinement. 7. Ternary Cluster Decomposition Equations: In studying the ternary hadron structure and ternary quark dynamics, ternary cluster decomposition equations could be derived to analyze the ternary correlations and ternary clustering patterns of quarks within hadrons. These equations could take the form: Γₙ(x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ) = Σₖ Cₖ(x₁, x₂, ..., xₖ) × Γₙ₋ₖ(xₖ₊₁, xₖ₊₂, ..., xₙ) where: - Γₙ(x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ) is the ternary n-particle correlation function - Cₖ(x₁, x₂, ..., xₖ) are ternary cluster coefficients - × represents a ternary multiplication or ternary convolution operation These ternary cluster decomposition equations would enable the analysis of ternary quark correlations and ternary clustering patterns within hadrons, providing insights into the ternary structure and dynamics of quark confinement. These are just a few examples of the novel ternary equations that could emerge in developing a ternary model for quark confinement and strong interactions. These equations would incorporate ternary algebraic structures, ternary calculus concepts, ternary tensor operations, and ternary geometric representations, showcasing the unique mathematical frameworks and computational approaches enabled by the ternary formulation. Deriving, analyzing, and numerically solving these ternary equations would be crucial steps in establishing the validity and potential advantages of the ternary model in advancing our understanding of quark confinement and strong interactions. Additionally, comparing the predictions of these ternary equations with existing experimental data and theoretical models would be essential for assessing the viability and scientific merit of the ternary approach.

@Stacee-jx1yz

20 күн бұрын

Let's continue exploring and showcasing more novel ternary equations that could emerge in the development of a ternary model for quark confinement and strong interactions: 8. Ternary Potential Models for Quark Interactions: To study the ternary dynamics of quark-quark interactions within hadrons, ternary potential models could be formulated, leading to ternary equations such as: V(r) = Vₒ(r) + Vₛ(r) + Vₜ(r) where: - V(r) is the ternary quark-quark potential as a function of ternary separation distance r - Vₒ(r) is the ternary confinement potential (e.g., ternary linear or ternary Cornell potential) - Vₛ(r) is the ternary spin-spin interaction potential - Vₜ(r) is the ternary tensor interaction potential These ternary potential terms could take forms like: Vₒ(r) = κr + σ/r Vₛ(r) = (αₛ/r³)⊗(λ₁⊗λ₂) Vₜ(r) = (αₜ/r³)⊗(S₁⊗S₂) where: - κ, σ, αₛ, and αₜ are ternary coupling constants - ⊗ represents ternary tensor products or ternary contractions - λ₁ and λ₂ are ternary Gell-Mann matrices (ternary SU(3) generators) - S₁ and S₂ are ternary spin operators These ternary potential models and their associated ternary equations would provide a framework for studying the ternary interactions and ternary dynamics of quarks within hadrons, potentially leading to insights into the mechanisms of quark confinement and the ternary structure of hadrons. 9. Ternary Coupled-Channel Equations: In studying the ternary interactions between quarks and gluons, as well as the ternary transitions between different hadronic states, ternary coupled-channel equations could be formulated, such as: (E - Hₒ)Ψ = ΣₖVₖΨₖ where: - E is the ternary energy eigenvalue - Hₒ is the ternary free particle Hamiltonian - Ψ is the ternary coupled-channel wave function - Vₖ is the ternary coupling potential for channel k - Ψₖ is the ternary wave function for channel k These ternary coupled-channel equations would incorporate ternary Hamiltonian operators, ternary coupling potentials, and ternary wave functions to describe the ternary interactions and ternary transitions between different hadronic states, providing insights into the ternary dynamics of quark confinement and strong interactions. 10. Ternary Lattice QCD Correlation Functions: In ternary lattice QCD (LQCD) simulations, ternary correlation functions could be calculated to extract ternary observables related to quark confinement and strong interactions. These ternary correlation functions could take the form: C(t) = Σₓ,y⟨Ω|O(x,t)O(y,0)|Ω⟩ where: - C(t) is the ternary correlation function as a function of ternary time t - Ω represents the ternary vacuum state - O(x,t) is a ternary operator (e.g., ternary quark bilinear) at ternary space-time point (x,t) - ⟨...⟩ represents the ternary vacuum expectation value These ternary correlation functions would be calculated using ternary Monte Carlo techniques on ternary lattices, and their ternary spectral decompositions could be analyzed to extract ternary hadron masses, ternary form factors, and other ternary observables related to quark confinement and strong interactions. These examples showcase the rich variety of novel ternary equations that could emerge in developing a ternary model for quark confinement and strong interactions. These equations would incorporate ternary algebraic structures, ternary calculus concepts, ternary tensor operations, ternary geometric representations, and ternary numerical techniques, highlighting the unique mathematical frameworks and computational approaches enabled by the ternary formulation. Deriving, analyzing, and numerically solving these ternary equations, as well as comparing their predictions with existing experimental data and theoretical models, would be crucial steps in establishing the validity and potential advantages of the ternary model in advancing our understanding of quark confinement and strong interactions. Additionally, these novel ternary equations could potentially lead to new insights, computational efficiencies, or alternative perspectives on the behavior of quarks and the nature of strong interactions.

This one was phenomenal! ❤

Oh how I wish I could stop thinking about money and surviving and just spend every waking moment thinking about the mysteries of this reality!

I love hearing about physics from Sterling Malory Archer.

The age of “quick everyone! Jump over board before the ship sinks!” is over. Now it’s about, “hey! Why is the ship sinking?”

Tracking the significant digits in the constants wastes too much of my brain power. Can setting one of them to 1 and calculating the others off of that unit clean things up at all?

@TheMemesofDestruction

20 күн бұрын

1:11:08 - :D Just stuff doing things. ^.^

59:04 Has anyone ever done an experiment to confirm that other (macroscopic) things* going through "slits" don't have a similar or some other weird "inference" pattern? 🤷 *(eg. basketballs into hoops🏀, bullets or sand ⏳ ⌛ into holes at high speed)

Phi = 137.5 golden cut / 1.618 constant 168 phi and pi and e related, spiral over circle point looks like spiral looks like circle depending on perspective.

@0x44Monad

17 күн бұрын

Torus key

whether the speed of light varies is asilly question, you have to ask whether it changes in a measurable way or has a change that is not measurable directly related to gravity and geometry, and the second one has an answer of yes depending on coordinates. also in accelerating frames the speed of light can vary, again depending on coordinate choice. but the coordinate choices that make thespeed oflight always constant are silly, it doesnt change anything, the dynamics ofa varying speed of light producing gravity is still there.

Did you forget to add the timestamps? Theres only 0:00 "Go!"

@DemystifySci_Podcast

20 күн бұрын

They got deleted...working on it!

25:12 (Flat Earth, But Worth Financing) “Fears of traveling too far on the ocean…flat Earth…idea of exploring came with a sense of terror.” It was also EXPENSIVE. However, explorers were able to CONVINCE kings and queens to finance the voyage and/or settlements. How? 🤔 There had been the idea of a round Earth for some time. Mostly due to maps and stories. Flat, was just good enough for most people back then. Without this idea, the thought of sponsoring, what could very well be the most humiliating risk, would be too ridiculous to contemplate. (Watch Dr. Richard Thompson for map visual video…if you want…🤣) I believe that the flat earth theory stemmed from simply misunderstanding ancient Indian maps, by common folk, that were stereographic planograms, charting where the stars, sun, and moon would be, over a limited circular surface area, on a globe… Which was the purpose and intent of THOSE maps. Kind of like, OUR map we use is flat, And land is distorted, but its purpose is to LINE UP points of longitude accurately, to help with sailing. Mercator I think is the map.

Figure out this pattern..two down one up one down one up

Slicing the Ruliad

You know, you guys should try getting Dr. David E. Martin on the podcast. But...I don't think he would accept. If you get Dr. Martin on your podcast, and it goes well, that would be something. Make the pitch about unifying science and alchemy. He probably will reject your invitation. I can't imagine a world where he accepts. I'm willing to be surprised.

@DemystifySci_Podcast

20 күн бұрын

There's a bunch of David martins, which one do you mean?

@YawnGod

19 күн бұрын

@@DemystifySci_Podcast And they call you scientists.

This guest goes across and back between particle and wave as though they are the one same thing(s) .. the first term speaks of volume and the other of displacement, which are mutually distinct conceptually and physically .. relativity brain is fatal to formation of rational conclusions .. photons is not protons is not baseballs is not bullhorns, let alone tsunamis. Aboard the rocket ship, once that ball leaves the hand of the one experiencing floor .. in zero g .. as the floor continues accelerating away from nozzled thrust along whatever path .. the ball is itself falling along through space according with f=mA, coasting because zero g .. The floor will get there on time but keep your eye on (center of mass of) the ball .. he's an author(ity) and poet(ic) but how much brilliance is really dazzling there? .. truly baffling .. throw something up, it falls back down, unless or until tennis racket, for example .. **and btw, artificial gravity in space flight works via axial rotation. As geometries form languages of reason, of relations, so maths form languages of persuasion, of description. e=mc^2 without the gamma term == nothing without something, an empty universe with one mass, (and/or e, in a field somewhere) = somehow. Physical constants are convenient, constants of nature, not so much. Referring to that stuff as an elevator thought experiment is a clue of itself. During acceleration, faster each time period, work being applied to system, speed and momentum increase .. During motion, steady on per time period, unless or until interfered with, speed and momentum remain constant .. split hairs down to friction and density as needed. Meanwhile at one metrology hub, BIPM certifies length and duration as two sides of a one same coin, consensually defined by arbitrary assignment to the term called c because 'it is known' backed up by 'we of the Academy said so'. That c may now be fully constant provides little mystery, simplified into that circular arrangement, rubbery yardsticks and melting clocks may result. If a and b are defined in terms of c while c is itself composed of a and b, then if any of a b or c do experience change, so do the others in unison. That frequency/wavelength must = 1 over a given length is shown true by geometry and arithmetic, but by supposition to let c = 1 conjures by maths alone. Those stories of hot below require closer examination, to be sure. The physical constants conflated with constants of nature .. maths describe what is and what may never be but nature cannot be fooled.

Have you ever considered what the ancient Indians have known and written down in respect to science?

@DemystifySci_Podcast

20 күн бұрын

any references on that?

demagogy

Metaphysics

Michio Coo Koo Clock oo is in the same camp. Child prodigy because mother said so

@lukegratrix

19 күн бұрын

Every time there's a new book to sell en masse out pops Michio Coo Koo Clock oo. Let's build particle accelerators in the garage mommy. Okay baby. Eat your yogurt

When Wolfram claims to have been a particle physicist as a child, most of us with a good sense of humor share a glance and have a good laugh. Wolfram is a fraud