Minko for president

Big lover of RxJS here, but to be fair, because of its (initial) complexity Angular have not been able to catch up with React's popularity. I am glad they're making it optional.

Unfortunately lots of old news that was already out there and not really answering the questions that the community still had on various topics. Like the state of testing tools (since deprecating Karma and Protractor it hasn't really been updated at all). Also esbuild is nice but its still outputting a bazilion files that might not work for every use case yet (especially mobile)

@fabiocroldan

29 күн бұрын

They are working on "automatic AI testing"

Something that's really interesting and not specifically highlighted is that Angular is slowly getting rid of decorators. I'm a fan of decorators but it seemed like a vulnerability for Angular. The reason is that Angular is using the experimental decorators and not the TS 5 decorators. The TS5 decorators are more aligned with the EcmaScript proposal for decorators. So I've always wondered what would happen to Angular if Typescript decides to deprecate the experimental decorators

cool to see how google team molds web, angular still the most complete framework

Excelente herramienta de crom de Chrome, felicitaciones

Great job! Waiting for optional RxJS

@ikgeek

Ай бұрын

why ?

@ivan.jeremic

Ай бұрын

lol

26:00 Is there ongoing work to help ESBuild reduce the bundle size?

@Suneeh1338

28 күн бұрын

yes! Angular 18 will come out later this week. And they announced even better performance and bundle size reduction

A someone who started with angular quite recently (approx 3 months), Shall I put my efforts on RXJS or not? I already see very less resources on angular and I'm not very sure about what things to go with. If anyone with some relevant experience then please leave a suggestion.

@LP...

Ай бұрын

As someone with 4 years of experience in angular I say yes, is worth it, RxJs is not only more complete but also is not an "angular thing", rxjs is a standalone library and can be used outside angular, even with vanilla js. So yes, it is useful to learn it.

@ivan.jeremic

Ай бұрын

As someone with a more clear view from the outside I say no.

@LP...

Ай бұрын

If the people start to explain their reasons for their choices those answers could become useful for our friend to make a more based decision.

@xucongzhan9151

Ай бұрын

Depends on what you want to achieve at the moment. If your goal is just to learn the framework for fun/side projects/expand your view, RxJS can wait till quite a bit later. But if you goal is to become a professional frontend developer, or more specifically, Angular developer, yes, you should invest in learning RxJS. (They *will* come up in an Angular interview, if you need a more substantial reason. :) I'd suggest getting familiar with the essentials first, like data and event binding, routing, forms, DI, state management, etc. Then when you dive into the reactive style of programming, learn common RxJS operators and use cases and *unlearn* all the bad habits as you go. Async programming is difficult and tricky at the same time. RxJS is not the only tool but it does provide tools to let you deal with the async complexity more concisely. And observer pattern has been around for decades so there's nothing wrong learning about a tool that promotes and implements it. But yeah, depending on your capacity and primary goal, you should prioritize your learning wisely.

Cooooool

The only useful part of Angular is data/ui binding in my opinion. Please see the new "features" as liabilities while they might be assets.

I notice an obsession with efficiency in rendering "text", but these days what people consume most is video.

big kudos for the new feature of Angular, but guys, please do a better presentation, avoid this sonnet recitation of three in robotic style, you're not playing Macbeth of Shakespeare

who did the audio though it sounds horrible

A new messup with RxJS on the way

I love this new terminology, "AnguWiz"

@emanuelzhupa

Ай бұрын

WizAng

Why would we need al those features if you spend almost half of Google I/O trying to convince us that AI is taking over not only our lives but our work as well :) Just give us angular AI already.

Angular is so awesome

you could trash out rxjs from ang interceptor and other libs so we don't have to use it.

🫡

ang is the best

The annoying thing with Angular is that companies are still stuck in the much older versions and do not want to upgrade to the latest version.

@GLawSomnia

Ай бұрын

doesnt really sound like an Angular problem to me

@manikandankaliyappan6764

Ай бұрын

They need money bro to re-write!!

@ivan.jeremic

Ай бұрын

How is this effecting you are these your companies?😂

@stephenikuomola

Ай бұрын

@@GLawSomnia Yes, it isn't an Angular issue. I didn't word it, but you understand what I mean.

@stephenikuomola

Ай бұрын

@@ivan.jeremic It would not be fun not to use the latest version. However, I understand that updates cost a lot of money.

input.required () what is this syntax..it should have been input.required ()

@TayambaMwanza

Ай бұрын

Why?

@DisturbedNeo

Ай бұрын

Unfortunately, static members cannot reference class type parameters. You could have: new input().required(); But I hope we can all agree that's gross and worse than input.required();

And again the misleading, still highly debatable, Zippy is back 😹

React and next js better

@xucongzhan9151

Ай бұрын

at marketing and selling themselves, true

@merlinwarage

29 күн бұрын

for hobby projects, maybe.

@TheReallamos

24 күн бұрын

for noobs

Fraud