What Now For The Higgs Boson?
For a report on ABC's Catalyst program (www.abc.net.au/catalyst/), I visited the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland to find out what is being done now that the Higgs Boson has been discovered.
Although its mass has been measured around 125-126 GeV most of the other properties of the particle remain unknown. Its spin appears to be 0 or 2 but more results are required to nail this down. If it is the standard model Higgs, the spin should be 0, resulting in a fairly symmetric distribution of decay products in the detectors.
We may know this year if it's not the standard model Higgs - this would be the case if it doesn't decay into specific particles with the expected frequency. However if it is the standard model Higgs, it may take many more years to be certain. The large hadron collider will be shut down in 2013 for upgrades so that higher energies up to 14 TeV can be tested. Right now the LHC is operating at 8 TeV. The next announcement is expected in December.
Пікірлер: 2 100
Just to clarify: The higgs boson fitted the standard model making everyone really sad. :(
@tiannahiggs2561
6 жыл бұрын
my last name is higgs
@zacharyhizon5165
6 жыл бұрын
Tianna Higgs are you a boson?
@blureyes106
6 жыл бұрын
Technically, they are also satisfied that it fits, but now it leaves them looking for more without any feasible leads.
@DragPlix
5 жыл бұрын
Saw this video After 7 years this comment killed my vibes.. I was expecting to see this was not standard model higgs but first comment I saw was the reality :(
@Enonymouse_
5 жыл бұрын
Higgs boosom, it's a very busty particle and full of fun.
I'm working on it. I want it to be really good - that takes time. Sorry for the wait!
Excellent. The fact of Peter Higgs being alive to see these results is incredible and motivational.
I'm visiting the CERN Open Days this weekend so I'm watching a bunch of vids about the LHC and Higgs to prepare, and this is the most illuminating one I've seen. Thank you!
not only were these very high energy collisions, they were also high luminosity which means lots of collisions per second. That results in much more data, allowing better statistical discrimination of the signal from noise.
@TomTom-rh5gk
2 жыл бұрын
The Higgs makes matter not mass. Why don't you admit it?
@pranavs7840
2 жыл бұрын
kk
@Mr.PandeyRishav
10 ай бұрын
Yes exactly, luminosity is no. of collisions per second per unit cross sectional area :)
they do create new particles. They create particles that weren't there before. For example, it is possible to turn a photon into an electron-positron pair if the energy of the photon is high enough.
holy cow...this was 3 years ago already? I must be getting old man...I remember this like it was yesterday...if you'd asked me when this was from, I'd probably say something like "january? maybe march? I forget"...unreal...
@crunchybanana6616
5 жыл бұрын
This comment was made 3 years ago? Damn
@kgangadhar5389
5 жыл бұрын
True
@animalbird9436
5 жыл бұрын
Must be the weed your chongin. 😝
@thundercloudjern9419
5 жыл бұрын
Higgs' Boson is nothing to play with. Turn off Cern' now before they blow our Universe to Smitherin's.
@ArchangelExile
4 жыл бұрын
@@crunchybanana6616 This comment was made 7 months ago? Damn
For a species that has come from hunting in the savannah, evolving through millions of years, developing civilization and knowledge, to break matter into it's most fundamental components, and discovering how the universe works, this is a remarkable time, worthy of awe and optimism for future generations.
@Immortal-pu8gr
6 ай бұрын
I wish we could know that before we die,
it actually is not talking about a mirror expanding universe - but a doubling of the number of fundamental particles. These 'supersymmetric' particles have not yet been observed.
Next up: graviton
@The_NSeven
7 жыл бұрын
Kyle Netherwood good luck finding one
@kylenetherwood8734
7 жыл бұрын
Nikolaj Jensen That's what I'm saying
@hasan7275
6 жыл бұрын
doubt
@sermuns
6 жыл бұрын
Didn't Einstein prove gravity wasn't a force, but a curvature in the spacetime?
@Euquila
6 жыл бұрын
I don't think we will find spin-2 particles (or spin-3/2 particles for that matter). The Higgs was the last major missing piece of 20th century physics. 21st century physics will require a whole new kind of physical model of the universe.
My brother in law helped find the Higgs!
@AlRomo19
10 жыл бұрын
are you dying of jealousy? x3 congrats to your family \m/,
@blackeagle2314
10 жыл бұрын
***** not particularly. i have my own talents and interests. although i LOVE the subject of science, i am very happy with my own achievements. I am very proud of his status in the scientific community and very much enjoy his company and participation within :)
@whatisthenirl
10 жыл бұрын
Tanner saslow A shame many of the researchers who worked together to find the thing ended up not being publicly recognized...
@robertofontiglia4148
10 жыл бұрын
TheNirl Oh but they were. All of them, very equally - their names are all cited in the papers that were published. No joke. Thousands of them, it takes a lot of pages, just for the names of the authors. Not all of them got TV interviews, though... I guess that's what you mean...
@blackeagle2314
10 жыл бұрын
Roberto Fontiglia i know, but it is still fairly prestigious to be apart of that.
2-3 years later now they're coming to find out that it's something more profound.
@btfranco2919
6 жыл бұрын
dustynbones where is that info found? So many years and you don't hear anything of this anymore.
Just came back from there two days ago. Had a good look around LHCb.
I wonder: does the standard model address whether the Higgs field is homogeneous? If the field is of uniform density throughout, a 1kg mass would have 1kg of inertial resistance anywhere in the universe. On the other hand, if the field were "clumpy" like a fog or perhaps even clustered like galaxies, that 1kg mass could experience greater inertia where the Higgs field is more dense and less inertia where it's less dense.
@Baronstone
10 жыл бұрын
True and it makes you wonder if the so called dark matter might be nothing more than the Higgs field itself
@JoelMurphy77
10 жыл бұрын
That's a really interesting supposition that I hadn't considered.
@hameem1347
10 жыл бұрын
Baronstone That is a very interesting thought :)
@Baronstone
10 жыл бұрын
Hameem The idea really makes you think about it.
@hameem1347
10 жыл бұрын
Baronstone yup .. it sure does mate !
This was perhaps the best of all of the videos you have made.
Great video! This is truly amazing stuff. It's an exciting time to be alive.
4:00 NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN
@TS1336
7 жыл бұрын
Pestrutsi
@TruthIsTheNewHate84
5 жыл бұрын
NEIN!
@holysong2099
3 жыл бұрын
200th like von mir
"I better like to be late than early"... Words to live by.
@THEMATT222
3 жыл бұрын
I'm 7years late replying to this comment
@K0nomi
3 жыл бұрын
@@THEMATT222 im 10 hours early :D
@THEMATT222
3 жыл бұрын
@Konomi Noice👍
Veritasium, First off, wonderful video! Do you recommend an updated video of yours or of another's channel that you have watched in order for us to further explore this concept? Please let me know!
It amazes me that CERN recently shut down the super collider for a several year period to re-tune it for more power. It takes SEVERAL YEARS to turn it off, re-calibrate it, and power it back up. That machine has to be added to the "wonders of the world" list. It's an engineering accomplishment that is absolutely mind boggling.
so its 3 years later, is this the standard model higgs?
@zachos-un6py
7 жыл бұрын
what do you mean, the Higgs proton is a part of the standard model but it isn't THE standard model
@eloujtimereaver4504
7 жыл бұрын
He is asking if its behavior and properties match those predicted in the standard model, or if they deviate from it.
@2awesome292
7 жыл бұрын
Elouj Time Reaver same boring standard model
@DexFire1115
7 жыл бұрын
RAIN it's all most 4 years
@c00kiem0nster1999
7 жыл бұрын
boson*
There are lots of fields, no need to single out the Higgs field - what about the electromagnetic field, the electron field, or the quark field? Reality seems to be based on the existence of quite a few fields. So if you want, you could ask why does anything exist at all? Lawrence Krauss took a stab at this in his latest book.
this was a great discussion. Splendid job!
This helped me sooo much, thank you. I was always confused with the term Higgs Boson. Now.. next phase. SPARTICLE!
I wonder what all those scientists do everyday there (genuine question) what their individual roles are, how they work together.. It'd be super interesting
@sbaromski
7 жыл бұрын
That's what I'm talking about! I want to understand the real scientific method here, not just hear about their results. Maybe by explaining how it all works, what all the moving pieces are, then people might be interested to participate. How can you get an advanced degree in a scientific field of study if you don't even know that it exists?
@sbaromski
7 жыл бұрын
Norm T are you trolling? Or so stupid that you misunderstood a very straightforward and simple statement? I'm talking about motivating and informing students to enable them to choose careers in the ever expanding fields of science and engineering, a field which will require more and more educated people as time progresses. Something that the US education system doesn't seem to be doing very well.
@Foozie3moons
7 жыл бұрын
Scott's question was incredibly benign and inspired by scientific curiosity. How in the world did you find a way to take offense to it? Furthermore, how does an educated individual such as yourself respond in such a way to a simple question? Questions are a fundamental part of science, and we would not have had any of the advances in technology and science that you listed if someone had not posed the question. Responding in the manner that you have is incredibly counterproductive. But perhaps that's the point, in which case your opinion is inconsequential. If that is not the point, and you truly care about science and advancing technology, then you should definitely change your attitude.
@sbaromski
7 жыл бұрын
Matthew Bell I think that Norm T was just a troll. There's no other way to explain how and why a person would say such ridiculous things. Or maybe he just has really bad eyesight and couldn't read what I wrote, and decided to fly off the handle in a very pathetic display of unbridled internet rage over the few bits and pieces of my message that he could actually read, completely failing to comprehend what was actually said. Either way, it was kind of entertaining.
@Foozie3moons
7 жыл бұрын
Sad, is what it was. Especially on a veritasium video.
Good thing they generate more questions than they do answers or they would be out of a friggin job
Would be awesome if you did an update on this 10 years on 👌🏻
It awesome how I got this video recommended on July 4th.. when the announcement was made.
4:01 When a German gets mad
@g-smith4466
3 жыл бұрын
Oof
@iwbmo
2 жыл бұрын
hahahahahah that got a big laugh out of me
@samanwayapatra504
2 жыл бұрын
Wow, sooo underrated comment
So much awesome
well someone hit 10 million, congrats brother
This video opens a new dimension to the world of science itself. Thanks for the explanation Sir..🙃🙃
5:31 "jeah, mugabugabu".
@anushkalols
3 жыл бұрын
Lmao 🤣👏🏽 But he actually said "yeah but with gamma-gamma"
@maxwellsequation4887
3 жыл бұрын
5:30
If the new physics is along the lines we expect, there's a possibility of additional spatial dimensions or a mirror image of the entire universe... um what? I had to rewind that part several times
@uninsulatedshrimp5518
3 жыл бұрын
@@filadog don’t they have evidence for particles breaking charge parity and time symmetry?
@gaggudhillon1535
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah weak force breaks all three symmetries. Parity sym. Broke found in 1976 n got noble prize in colorado by pr. Wu zhang. Couple of years later charge n noble prize. Last decade time broke found. This is only for WEAK FORCE 3rd of standard model universe
@WallskiFPV
3 жыл бұрын
@@gaggudhillon1535 Nothing breaks CPT all at once though.
@IsomerSoma
3 жыл бұрын
He talked about string theory. At this time there was the hope that the lhc would be able to confirm predictions made by string theory ... but what they found was nothing. String theory is dead.
new things to come, very good
Wow I am just on a science streak when it comes to the topic about the higgs boson. Such a interesting topic when it comes to science and the theory of mass.
This makes me feel like a kid again. I'm glad they're doing this - even though the "Higgs Field" is something old in our minds, thinking about it in relation to the atom is fascinating. Further research could have tremendous impacts. The EU should give its Nobel Prize to CERN.
All these talk about Higg's Boson, but not a mention of Satyandra Nath Bose, after whom 'boson' is named. Who along with Einstein formed Bose-Einstein statistics which governs how bosons work. He died without a Nobel too. Makes me really sad.
@yashaswinarayana7648
6 жыл бұрын
Atandra Chakraborty yes me too
@trangium
5 жыл бұрын
So that’s the person who discovered the Bose-Einstein Condensate?
@kumarharsh77
5 жыл бұрын
Well, it'd have been nice to have mentioned his name, but it's not like JJ Thompson or Ernst Rutherford or any of the other past scientists got mentioned either.
@halpointon6085
5 жыл бұрын
They are talking about not just bosons, but the higgs boson. There is no reason to mention them
@kumarharsh77
5 жыл бұрын
@Ritika Dubey The comment is senseless, but that's all. No need to do personal attacks.
Its videos like this that are the reason why i'm subscribed to veratasium
Thank you...... Very much
What determines how much a particle reacts with the higgs field?
@TheMilkManCow
8 жыл бұрын
+Aman Vernekar Well... it's kind of paradoxical from my understanding. The mass defines how much it interacts but the Higgs field but the Higgs field gives it it's mass. But i'm certainly no expert.
@sorenlily2280
8 жыл бұрын
+Aman Vernekar I'm also no expert but from what I understand, nothing really. Asking that question is analogous to asking why some particles interact with electromagnetism and some don't, or why are the fundamental forces as strong as they are and not stronger/weaker. It's just how the universe works, the intrinsic properties of the particles themselves. It's very likely that there is no true answer. If string theory, or something similar, turns out to be true then that would answer your question, but you could then you could just ask why do strings have these properties? If you ask "why" forever, eventually you'll have to end at "because that's just how the universe works".
so the field the Higgs produces is what gives mass to the particles?
@hosseinimaryam9344
7 жыл бұрын
Crimson Steel Moon (The Wolf) Yes.
@CrimsonSteelMoonTheWolf64
7 жыл бұрын
Ok thanks for clearing that up
@philopateeratef4661
7 жыл бұрын
Crimson Steel Moon (The Wolf) the higgs is the excitation in the field, it doesn't produce it but it proves it's existence
@CrimsonSteelMoonTheWolf64
7 жыл бұрын
Ok , so what does give the mass to everyday particles?
@philopateeratef4661
7 жыл бұрын
Crimson Steel Moon (The Wolf) their interaction with the higgs field, i think that he has a video on the subject
Wow! You went to CERN. U da man! (this video is 5 year old, vintage, hasn't dated, great work!)
@bullskitter
5 жыл бұрын
It's actually 7 years old m8
Incredible work. Wish there was such a large hadron collider in India
OK am I the only one that see the contradiction of what's being said here? Einsteins theory of relativity say mass gets heavier as it moves closer to the speed of light but the Higgs field theory says a particle can't become mass until it is slowed down? Doesn't make much sense
@lucascharrer3744
9 жыл бұрын
Actually mass is the other way around. The property of mass is basically the property an object has so that it cannot travel at the speed of light. And remember, Mass getting heavier at closer the speed of light still interacts with the Higgs field, so long that it doesn't travel at the speed of light. So, as long as an object is moving slower than light, no matter how close, the Higgs field is going to give it mass.
@MeepChangeling
9 жыл бұрын
The Standard model only applies to macro space. Quantum Mechanics applies to particle sized systems. This is very important because it means thermodynamics only applies for things on the macro scale. There are may differently layers to physics. Physics is like an onion, where each layer has it's own rules.
Young veritasium looks a lot like Andrew Dotson
This is where I'm going with my class in 2 years. I've been exited about this for 4 years already.
@judeautheguy
2 жыл бұрын
How did that go?
@jagc2206
2 жыл бұрын
@@judeautheguy it was cancelled in favour of going to DASY due to reasons. DESY was great, but CERN would have been super cool. Thanks for checking in 3 years later! ❤️
i remember writing middle school papers on this particle cus i was so facinated with it. sadly i have lost some interest in studying the higgs boson but i still think its really cool.
That music at the end- wow! Wish someone could tell me the name of the piece :/
@JaleaIsGaming
8 жыл бұрын
+Vinay Seth Ar00d - S4nd.
@poseidongaming8322
8 жыл бұрын
+Vinay Seth Darude - Sandstorm
@vinayseth1114
8 жыл бұрын
+Poseidon Gaming Yes, take your plagiarized humour and stick it up your ass.
@poseidongaming8322
8 жыл бұрын
Vinay Seth LMAO
@vinayseth1114
8 жыл бұрын
+Carl Davidson Hey thanks man! Great to find such music through youtube videos- much better than what's out there in the mainstream today!
so the protons are travelling at 0.0299792458 m/s slower than the speed of light.
@2awesome292
8 жыл бұрын
as far as compared to us yes (as long as you did your math right i suppose) But with general relativity, only relative matters, similar as how absolute zero works, only 10mK is a lot different than 10nK even though there is very absolute difference in temperature
good shit Derek. Well done mate
6:36, the guys speaking about science looks so in love with, it's true the purpose of science is to find answers but most of the times we find ourselves generating even more question, that is the most beautiful part.
You should make a new channel only for physics.
I want to become scientist
@kunalverma2836
5 жыл бұрын
Bilkul ban bhai
Why are some particles impede by the Higgs field more, some less and some not? This channel drives on nuts, because You always leave out the interesting questions!
One of my favourite things about Einstein's equations, is that you can passingly measure the mass of a particle in eV (or for that matter other units of energy).
If I wanted to visit CERN could I just do that?
@erikhakansson591
9 жыл бұрын
I think you'll need to have contact with someone, you can't just walk right in.
@2112rohit
9 жыл бұрын
epicmario plush Just visit the website. They host single person or a group of people. You have to ask for an appointment on the calendar.
@boolshmool
9 жыл бұрын
epicmario plush Just say you know Steve.
@boomstick900
9 жыл бұрын
Tomer Malka Zaragosa?
@boolshmool
9 жыл бұрын
I was gonna say Hawking, but sure..
HEYHEYHEYHEY! What happens when you smash two eggs together? You make an EGGS BOSON! LAAAAAWWWWWLLLLL!
@McBango
10 жыл бұрын
nice one
@Kris2340k
9 жыл бұрын
YOUR SUCH A STRANGE BUNCH OF PARTICLES
@keira_churchill
9 жыл бұрын
Unless they are duck eggs, in which case you just get a lot of quarks.
@McBango
9 жыл бұрын
Keira Churchill OHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!
@lairbaud
6 жыл бұрын
Higgsomelet
This video opened with a commercial for City of Refuge church. Incredible music! I watched the whole 90 seconds.
The joy of discovery & the vistas of knowledge that it opens up? Worth a laugh, wouldn't you say?
Cern: Discovers Higgs Boson Normally restrained particle physics community: YEAh bOi !!!
El Psy Congroo
@pragyan394
8 жыл бұрын
+Pielord Miniman I was thinking the same thing
@WaoWao69420
8 жыл бұрын
Tuturu
@SayoojSojenSpell1612
8 жыл бұрын
Tuturu
@blue_leader_5756
8 жыл бұрын
sorry me no speake whatever language you do-e
@MeoWHamster
7 жыл бұрын
Human is dead.
You've come a long way
They accelerated the protons to roughly 80% of the speed of light. This video explains a lot though and is really good :)
sorry i had to 4:03 NEIN!
Thanks youtube algorithm.. I guess?
RIP Peter Higgs. The loss of the universe by his death may not be in mass, But in the loss of a brilliant man, with a godly mind. 🌌
Thank you for the explanation. That makes sense. I was not thinking in that way. I was merely thinking about the electro-magnetic force binding them together. :-)
A historic. Not an historic.
@SpidzWT
7 жыл бұрын
In word format, yes, however in speaking, no. Because in English people shorten words all the time (can not, can't | would not, wouldn't), and thats what's happening. If you say the H, it would 'A historic' If you don't say the H, it would be 'An 'istoric' (Istoric may sound weird but Anistoric starts to make sense if you flow correctly)
@magnuswright5572
7 жыл бұрын
In some dialects of English, the 'h' in history is silent; thus, "an historic."
@nmarbletoe8210
7 жыл бұрын
yup, if you say it with a silent H then it's "An Historic," but if you say it with a vocalized H it should be "A Historic"
@ihsahnakerfeldt9280
6 жыл бұрын
Spidz The problem is he pronounced the h and still said _an_
99.9999999% c is infinitely smaller than c in terms of relativity
@natesmith9007
8 жыл бұрын
Ya but that's like saying you infinitely shorter than me or infinitely older than me
@najvolimsebe1827
8 жыл бұрын
+nathan smith rly nice example
@DerSim688
8 жыл бұрын
+Nathan Smith Nope its not. You have to think of Speed in terms of the Energy you need to put into an object to get it to that Speed. And to get an Object from 0 to 99.999...%*c you need an finite amount of energy, but getting it to 1c, you need an infinte amount of Energy. So for me, 99.999999....%*c is much closer to 0*c than to 1*c
@sbaromski
7 жыл бұрын
What are you talking about? What gave you the impression that you need "infinite" energy to accelerate an object to light speed? C does not equal infinity...
@dersim6885
7 жыл бұрын
+Scott Baromski Einstein tells you that you need infinite Energy to "reach" c with everything that got an nonzero mass. And if you think of speed as Rapidity (ask Wikipedia for that) c is indeed Infinity.
High energy particles are often unstable. Decay times are variable depending on the decay mode of the Higgs particle, and it can be calculated. Typical decay modes used for the observation of the particle is H -> diphoton or Higgs -> 2 leptons (or was it lepton, antilepton..)
We would love an update to this.
My belief is that atoms and subatomic particles are just another universe, and each particle is a separate universe and there's just an infinite amount of particles. And our universe and our solar system are just a larger version of that, and we're just a small piece of something bigger. I may or may not be high right now.
@Artemis-cl3tl
8 жыл бұрын
There is evidence to suggest that the universe is a hologram. A hologram is made up of the same picture repeating its self. Like a fractal, you keep zooming in and eventually you get the same picture you started with, the same happens when zooming out. An eternally repeating pattern.
@bocelott
8 жыл бұрын
+Willie Wilson Pretty sure that's not at all what they mean when they try and translate their mathematical ideas into layman's terms. What they mean is that the information of the 3d universe may be contained in 2d.
@Bloggerboy1000
8 жыл бұрын
+Michael McDonough Like the 4th dimension, right? From that point of view 3d looks flat, even time itself.
@adibejleri9664
8 жыл бұрын
And I thougt I was the only one........
@stefandeboer5213
8 жыл бұрын
+Adi Bejleri ikr
Of course it won't be the Standard Model Higgs. That would not serve the purpose keeping the funding rolling.
@JParril
10 жыл бұрын
You realize their funding doesn't affect their findings right? Like, they're not just about to screw with the data to make things weird enough to keep getting money.
@RadicalRC
10 жыл бұрын
You just blindly believe anything your told? I'd rather trust in the scientific method. These people are not different from any other. They are looking out for their own self interests. I don't look at the world through a straw.
@RadicalRC
10 жыл бұрын
Your argument using street language is very impressive. I've proven your side of the argument beyond rational dispute. My you are compelling. I must go back to the ally and study more graffiti so I can keep up.
@RadicalRC
10 жыл бұрын
J Parril My your an impressive debater. I'm you're at the top of your class.
@Dustballable
10 жыл бұрын
RadicalRC Using youtube to degrade those who cannot articulate well... Sounds like someone needs some therapy. Anyway, funding for the hadron collider is specifically to the collider. These physicists would be paid just as much, if not more, to go work for some government organization. Additionally, they know that being dishonest about their data will ruin the reputation of the entire project, which in turn ruins their own. Next time you're feeling bad about yourself, try to cope with it some way that isn't making kids on the internet feel bad about themselves.
When protons smash together a mess of new particles are created LOL I love that there technical talk
Well said
These videos are science weed
God-Particle … LOL Ridiculous!
@hotcorndog9288
9 жыл бұрын
Marko Ćavar Veggie Head
@samedman1
9 жыл бұрын
Hot Corn Dog Penis Head
@samedman1
9 жыл бұрын
Hot Corn Dog Penis Head
@samedman1
9 жыл бұрын
Hot Corn Dog Penis Head
@GoatOfTheWoods
8 жыл бұрын
+samed halafi Double Headed Penis Head
I would like lots more videos about this, :)
I agree. So many brilliant minds have passed before their genius has been validated. Kind of make you think though: Are we increasing the rate at which we progress, and will this caliber of discovery become more frequent? I hope so, and am glad Peter is around to witness this new era of particle physics.
yet we still arguing about how pyramids was made
@parthiancapitalist2733
6 жыл бұрын
Raziq Ilmi Egyptians only. End of story done
A hall full of nerds Can’t relate
So, lets figure out how far this will go with this youtube recommendation chain. I was impressed by the fact that seemingly there was 25k people who came from scythe lady video to the scythe festival one. From now on i am going to watch next 100 videos with this comment numerating my path. This is comment №81
@THEMATT222
3 жыл бұрын
Noice 👍
Your music is awsome i feel like i'm watching TV
My father said scientists found the God particle, so even science now admits that God exists(with a victorious smile), I tried very hard not to laugh, but failed, miserably..... Then of course I explained what it actually is.!
@philferrara5990
8 жыл бұрын
+Debopam Seal I really wish nobody had ever given it that label. Most (not all) of the religious people I know are very anti-science for whatever reason. At least now that it's been a while, the "Haha science! Now you've proven God exists!" blogs and articles seem to have gone away. The funny thing is, if science was able to somehow definitively prove that a god exists, it would be celebrated by them. I'm sure a lot of people would be personally shaken by it, but over time and with repeated empirical confirmation, it would be accepted. It seems like a lot of religious people think science is all about disproving the existence of their god, when in fact it's a search for understanding of everything. If any gods do exist, then they would be part of that everything which science strives to understand.
@dreamoutloud7181
8 жыл бұрын
+Phil Ferrara adding onto that, I don't see God (I'm an atheist, mind) as a being. I see God more as a force. I don't believe that there was something that created the universe, because the universe can't be created. It created itself and expands its volume infinitely. I think that the universe created God, if there is one. I see it as God is actually an existing force, not a being. A force called, well gravity. Something that moulds stars and planets, moves mountains and oceans. Gravity is something that no one to this day understands still. I see the stories of God and Religion fitting that model perfectly, however the stories of the Bible and such? Historically proven to be... Well wrong. Sorry. Not trying to start a flame war, just placing my opinion here for all to see.
@DunderHumorFan
8 жыл бұрын
+Dream out Loud so god is spacetime?
@mochzr
8 жыл бұрын
I hope you're joking
@dreamoutloud7181
8 жыл бұрын
+DunderHumorFan Yes, if you see what i said as that interpretation. It's only a theory I have that can be accepted by both religion and science I guess.
sounds like a terrible waste of money
@kepl3r21b2
9 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a step closer to the future of science and the understanding of the universe
@madpicken
9 жыл бұрын
so all that money and energy to detect one particle... there is no 4th dimension of space
@kepl3r21b2
9 жыл бұрын
Ok mr einstein. You have the proofs and knowledge to conclude that there is no 4rth spacial dimension... Peace put
@madpicken
9 жыл бұрын
well Einstein made that space-time dimension up, you see. ever just step back and think maybe that he was wrong about that?
@madpicken
9 жыл бұрын
nikola tesla thought Einstein was wrong
I just got here but, OMG!, you have made my day. I've been laughing for 10 minutes with your comments. Thank you xD
For some reason hearing about the Higgs got me really excited
We need an update video on the LHC
its a shame something like this dos not have millions of views
Such awsome. much wow.
I hope you do a follow up video to discuss what has been accomplished since then
Amazing!
Shubham: Because they didn't have colliders that could push the photons at high enough speeds. If you smash 2 particles at a slow speed the outcome is much different than at high speeds, just like in any collision. To get the higgs to appear you have to break a photon at higher speed to get it to break into more and more tiny pieces then analyze all those pieces and measure their energy states. A lot of this is up to chance so you don't always get a Higgs, so they do this over and over again to get statistically significant results. (for some reason I couldn't reply directly to your comment.)
you can express mass in energy units and energy in math units if you want, since you only have to divide / multiply by a constant factor
Correct my friend. :) Knowing all the answers is no fun. The fun is answer some of the questions and create a load of questions again. :)
What was the music track you used at the very end of the video? - - I cannot tell you how excited I'd be if the non-standard Higgs is discovered in my lifetime. How monumental would that day be? The bit that really gets to me is the possibilities that it entails and new discoveries that would follow after that. An entirely new understanding of physics... Crazy, right? - - Gets me thinking every time.
Awesome.
This is awesome
good question :D