What Makes TCG Anadolu a Unique Navy Ship

Ғылым және технология

The TCG Anadolu features a streamlined profile typical of amphibious assault ships, with a flight deck that stretches nearly the full length of the vessel.
It is akin to the U.S. Navy's America-class amphibious assault ships but The TCG Anadolu features a streamlined profile typical of amphibious assault ships, with a flight deck that stretches nearly the full length of the vessel.
It is akin to the U.S. Navy's America-class amphibious assault ships but features a ski-jump ramp, which the America class lacks.
This ski-jump ramp at the ship's front facilitates short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL)
TCG Anadolu is designed to handle a versatile array of equipment and personnel, including a combination of helicopters, fighters, drones, marine troops, and landing crafts.
Turkish-made military drones have gained significant recognition over the past few years. Turkey wants to further strengthen this technological momentum achieved in the military field.
When exclusively configured for drone operations, Anadolu can accommodate 30 to 50 TB-2 or more advanced TB-3 Bayraktar drones, as well as the turbofan-powered Kızılelma (Red Apple) combat UAV/unmanned fighters.
This capacity positions it to become the world's first drone-only aircraft carrier by the mid-2020s.
TCG Anadolu is also armed with 1 RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) launcher, 2 Phalanx Close-In Weapon Systems (CIWS), and 5 Aselsan STOP Remote Controlled Weapon Stations (RCWS) with 25 mm guns.
With the full-scale implementation of TCG Anadolu's carrier capability in 2025, the Turkish Navy will assume the leadership of a new doctrine in naval aviation.
Join our KZread channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/
Support IE for high-quality journalism: interestingengineering.com/su...

Пікірлер: 55

  • @prilep5
    @prilep58 ай бұрын

    “Fight smart not hard” Gatekeepers of the Black Sea

  • @MT-Power1

    @MT-Power1

    3 ай бұрын

    Biz nasıl savaşacağımizi biliriz , usa dan akıl gerek yok 😊

  • @joshflugel
    @joshflugelАй бұрын

    The Sedef (Turkey)-Navantia(Spain) consortium won the tender for the amphibious assault ship project of the Turkish Navy. Anadolu used the same design as that of the Spanish ship Juan Carlos I. The Spanish ship design by Navantia was built in Turkey, and the ship's weapon systems were procured by Turkish firms Aselsan and Havelsan.

  • @asahearts1
    @asahearts18 ай бұрын

    Amazed y'all still have a human narrator, and a really good one, at that!

  • @Djamonja

    @Djamonja

    8 ай бұрын

    How do you know that is a human narrator?

  • @asahearts1

    @asahearts1

    8 ай бұрын

    ​​​@@Djamonja​ A lot of it is listening to both for a long time, but for instance at 1:31 he starts getting tired and every few seconds you can hear him trying to catch his breath. At 2:08 and 2:47 his mouth is dry and he takes a moment to get back on track, even smacking his lips a bit. There are also some words he pronounces in ways humans tend to do veeerrrry slightly differently in certain contexts or when tired which robots do the same every time.

  • @illuminati2341
    @illuminati23417 ай бұрын

    Turkey and Spain have now talks about a second one but bigger then the Anadolu

  • @Derby08
    @Derby088 ай бұрын

    Great technology

  • @MattUK36
    @MattUK368 ай бұрын

    Fantastic Spanish 🇪🇦 vessel, a pretty relevant detail not mentioned a single time in this video. In any case, nicely chosen Turkey 👌🏻

  • @WinstoneSmith

    @WinstoneSmith

    8 ай бұрын

    Also omitted is that the drone use was not so intended but due to US cancelation of its F-35C V/STOL sale to Turkey.

  • @asahearts1

    @asahearts1

    8 ай бұрын

    I wonder what that says about Spain, politically 🤔 This gives me a little hope.

  • @WinstoneSmith

    @WinstoneSmith

    8 ай бұрын

    @@asahearts1 In any case, was built in Turkish shipyards. But military contracts are never revised here though.

  • @simpledude5974

    @simpledude5974

    8 ай бұрын

    ​@asahearts1 worry about your own politics. 😅

  • @ahmedelkhwaga2751

    @ahmedelkhwaga2751

    2 ай бұрын

    70% by türkiye tho

  • @homelandfighters8541
    @homelandfighters85418 ай бұрын

    The U.S still owes turkey for the f 35

  • @simpledude5974

    @simpledude5974

    8 ай бұрын

    Billions. And you know whats funny, they had the audacity to charge turkey for "storage" 🤣 😂 🤣 storage for something that is never going to or was going to come.

  • @homelandfighters8541

    @homelandfighters8541

    8 ай бұрын

    @@simpledude5974 Capitalism

  • @homelandfighters8541

    @homelandfighters8541

    7 ай бұрын

    @@simpledude5974 Because turkey making business with 'licensed' scammer.

  • @illuminati2341

    @illuminati2341

    7 ай бұрын

    Billions I mean ok don’t give the planes but at least give the money back

  • @ALWH1314

    @ALWH1314

    5 ай бұрын

    US should refund Turkey initial funding of F35 immediately.

  • @Sado_Er
    @Sado_Er8 ай бұрын

    That will be interesting

  • @HayatiKanbur-oo9gg
    @HayatiKanbur-oo9gg3 ай бұрын

    Nice

  • @mahmuttok
    @mahmuttok8 ай бұрын

    🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

  • @alalba2136
    @alalba21368 ай бұрын

    Spain, instead of selling ships, transfers technology. We have much left to learn.

  • @fxtymz1123

    @fxtymz1123

    4 ай бұрын

    Their in the same alliance it doesn’t matter if they own or help make one.. we all have the same enemy Russia China North Korea Iran

  • @yldrmbrs

    @yldrmbrs

    3 ай бұрын

    @@fxtymz1123 North Korea is just a paper tiger. Russia is and will be busy for a long term. The USA and its satellite Israel are the enemies of Iran, not any other countries at all. CHINA, that is the point.

  • @mscelik1190
    @mscelik11908 ай бұрын

    Masallah

  • @MovieUniversity
    @MovieUniversity8 ай бұрын

    “America class lacks STOVL ramp” the one thing I think is wrong in this videos. The U.S. LHD and LHA ships intentionally don’t have them by design. They don’t need them. F-35B’s and Harriers don’t need old tech like ramps.

  • @aowen2471

    @aowen2471

    6 ай бұрын

    Then why does the Royal Navy's new carriers have them for the F35B. They add capability beyond a normal flat deck takeoff.

  • @MovieUniversity

    @MovieUniversity

    6 ай бұрын

    @@aowen2471 no it doesn't. F-35s take off of US LHDs and LHAs just fine without a dopy looking ramp. The QE ships were originally going to have the ramps with a plan to remove them in the future. Doubtful that'll happen now as the MoD can't do anything right.

  • @aowen2471

    @aowen2471

    6 ай бұрын

    @@MovieUniversity Didn't say they couldn't just stated that the ramps add capability beyond a flat surface takeoff - this was proved during RN testing with test ramps on land. This was the case with the USMC AV8B vs. RN Harriers. If they don't add capability beyond a flat deck, why do so many carriers (except USMC) that has rolling takeoffs (Russian, Indian, Chinese, RN, etc.) have them - even the Italian's latest carrier Cavour for F35B? So many navy's seem to be making the mistake of extra weight on the bow of a ship, cost of build for, in your opinion, no gain? I can't find it now, but I previously read the USMC stated the ramps would interfere with Helo ops which would be a valid reason not to have them given the USMC's primary role. Only Fantasy Fleet Armchair Admirals believed the ramps to be removed at sometime to change to CATOBAR -- the RN has always known they don't have enough people or money to run CATOBAR. I seem to remember the CATOBAR option was for the French build option before they pulled out of the joint development.

  • @hendrik-jantoeset1620
    @hendrik-jantoeset16202 ай бұрын

    Miles, feet, inches, knots? Metric!

  • @25_26
    @25_268 ай бұрын

    BEING A TOY?

  • @fxtymz1123

    @fxtymz1123

    4 ай бұрын

    After watching this entire video he fact that you call it a toy You are so jealous lol I feel bad

  • @dragondude6984

    @dragondude6984

    Ай бұрын

    What about it is like a toy? Looks very real to me.

  • @bogdanshulman8081
    @bogdanshulman80818 ай бұрын

    Drone carriers sound useless

  • @asahearts1

    @asahearts1

    8 ай бұрын

    **refuses to elaborate**

  • @bogdanshulman8081

    @bogdanshulman8081

    8 ай бұрын

    @@asahearts1 I think the purpose of a UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) and an aircraft carrier are exactly the opposite. The purpose of a carrier is to bring as much air power as possible, while UAVs, on the other hand, are designed for reconnaissance, pinpoint strikes, and close air support. I don't see a reason to bring a massive ship to a war zone just to conduct pinpoint strikes; it seems impractical. UAVs can be a part of a carrier air wing, but they shouldn't be the primary component. We're not there yet! It's believed that only 7th-generation airplanes will be fully combat-capable like fighter jets and bombers. The 6th generation is a transitional phase, with the last operated fighter jets incorporating UAVs into the air operations.

  • @asahearts1

    @asahearts1

    8 ай бұрын

    @@bogdanshulman8081 There are a couple major assumptions which I think are wrong here. If I lay out some figures it might help clear up one of them. Gerald Ford Class aircraft carrier Displacement: 100,000 tons TCG Anadolu VTOL configuration displacement: ~25,000 tons Amphibious Assault Ship displacement: ~27,000 tons Izumo-class helicopter destroyer Displacement: 26,000 tons fully loaded, 19,500 tons standard The Izumo- class destroyer is often likened to an aircraft carrier and serves a similar purpose which cannot *quite* be fulfilled due to Japanese politics. It carries helicopters. It is often called a helicopter-carrier. To say that it is a failure in its role because it doesn't match up to a Gerald Ford would be way off base. Likewise, the TCG Anadolu fills *some* of the niche a carrier does, but using different tools and tactics in mind. I think drones are also rapidly changing roles, as well. Back in Iraq, just using them to spot artillery or whatever was their major use, but now we're seeing them used as incredibly cheap attack craft, sometimes at ranges which previously would be unthinkable. Even if we assume the drone technology hasn't quite seated into these new roles, it's still a good idea to have ships like the Andadolu on hand so we can be ready when they do. It's clear which way the wind is blowing, so it's best not to be reactive, but rather proactive. Finally, I'm forseeing an issue where militaries are unable to protect their very expensive aircraft due to new tactics and weapons systems. Certainly the US Navy would greatly benefit from these drone ships in the South China Sea, considering one of the difficulties in that region is getting assets in safely. The Navy could much more easily afford to lose a lot of drones, or even several of these small drone ships, rather than even one or two superarriers, dozens of aircraft, support craft, and importantly pilots.

  • @NomadFierce

    @NomadFierce

    8 ай бұрын

    ​@@bogdanshulman8081US cebtric thinking. If we Turks had this baby with tb3s our intervention in libya would be much easier and impactful.

  • @bogdanshulman8081

    @bogdanshulman8081

    8 ай бұрын

    @@NomadFierce or you could use the Akinci uav who has the range for that job and save tons of liras

Келесі