What Keeps Nuclear Weapons from Proliferating: The hardest step in making a nuclear bomb

Ғылым және технология

Bill explains that the hardest step is making the proper type of uranium. Weapons and power plants require uranium that contains a greater amount of the isotope uranium-235 than found in natural uranium, which is mostly uranium-238. He outlines the key difficulty in separating the two isotope: They have nearly identical properties. He explains the two key methods for separation: Gas diffusion and centrifuges.

Пікірлер: 183

  • @iCantMakeMovies
    @iCantMakeMovies11 жыл бұрын

    I just stumbled upon your channel. As a chemist, I never had much engineering in school and from watching a few of your videos, I have a lot more respect for the people who built the instruments I use every day. Separating two isotopes sounded fairly easy until I learned what sort of engineering is required to do so. I'm learning so much I just want to say thank you.

  • @BrandonAaskov
    @BrandonAaskov9 жыл бұрын

    I've been watching your videos all morning. Can't wait to buy this book. You have an amazing way of explaining complex topics in a concise and understandable way - no small feat, to be sure. Thank you!

  • @engineerguyvideo

    @engineerguyvideo

    9 жыл бұрын

    Thank you ... enjoy the book.

  • @MrGrizmint
    @MrGrizmint10 жыл бұрын

    youre a great host and made this extremely interesting!

  • @kbeckend
    @kbeckend11 жыл бұрын

    During the Manhattan Project the gaseous diffusion process at K-25 was not very efficient. The slightly enriched uranium from K-25 was sent to Y-12. The calutrons at Y-12 used an electromagnetic process and were used to complete the enrichment process.

  • @salescounter
    @salescounter11 жыл бұрын

    This video *IS* the bomb! Thank you for enriching my day.

  • @MylesJP
    @MylesJP11 жыл бұрын

    How do you know when you have enough U-235? Is the mass difference really enough to do volume/density calculations or would there be a more sophisticated method?

  • @DodgySmalls
    @DodgySmalls11 жыл бұрын

    Wow these are some really high quality layman's term demonstrations. Awesome video!

  • @Muonium1
    @Muonium111 жыл бұрын

    There is one other method of separation which doesn't rely on weight differences, but rather exploits the fantastically small differences in hyperfine transition energy of the isotopes. Very disturbingly, certain entities have recently discovered a method by which molecular uranium (235) hexafluoride gas can be selectively excited by using an exquisitely tuned carbon dioxide laser-pumped parahydrogen raman shifting technique. ...It is rumored to be 5x the efficiency of the Zippe centrifuges....

  • @lazygamerz
    @lazygamerz11 жыл бұрын

    I knew about how they separated uranium 235 from 238, but I had no idea it required houndreds or thousands of repeats, a hugely interesting fact!

  • @VirusesX01
    @VirusesX0111 жыл бұрын

    Just discovered your channel (because you commented in a brazilian video about the other line being faster) and I am amazed about the quality of every video. I don't know if you still do videos, but they are incredible. Thank you, from a new fan from Brazil.

  • @Truthiness231
    @Truthiness23111 жыл бұрын

    Very well done, I knew vague details of what was involved in getting near-pure 235, but this was a great in-depth look. Gotta go get that book now...

  • @AndyFoster405
    @AndyFoster40511 жыл бұрын

    I am sure I've said this before but again thanks for subtitling these videos. Thumbs up.

  • @MagnifloriousMummer
    @MagnifloriousMummer11 жыл бұрын

    Interesting, the process to enrich uranium isn't completely unlike the process to remove plasma from blood. The centrifuge device looks like a much larger version of the kind used at the plasma donation center where I used to work.

  • @Blixinator
    @Blixinator10 жыл бұрын

    I need to buy that book.

  • @VerySeriousUser
    @VerySeriousUser11 жыл бұрын

    These videos are perfect! No wonder I always get so happy when there's a new one :)

  • @antonclaeys
    @antonclaeys11 жыл бұрын

    matched perfectly with my Nuclear Energy course of last semester. I'm studying engineering too :)

  • @Rickane58
    @Rickane5811 жыл бұрын

    You call it a scale model of the first bomb ever used. Did you mean the first bomb used as a weapon? Otherwise, the first bomb used was the trinity test, which was a plutonium bomb as well.

  • @xxaba1989xx
    @xxaba1989xx11 жыл бұрын

    Thanks to your video I passed my physic exam!Thanks :)

  • @PinkCammy
    @PinkCammy11 жыл бұрын

    this is how to sell a book!

  • @eneekmot
    @eneekmot11 жыл бұрын

    So are these drums what Stuxnet targeted in the Iranian refineries?

  • @bytenik
    @bytenik11 жыл бұрын

    The big boy uranium was produced using gaseous diffusion, but the little boy's fuel was a cyclotron process using electromagnetic separation followed by conversion to plutonium. A uranium bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and a plutonium bomb on Nagasaki.

  • @NineTailedArrancar
    @NineTailedArrancar11 жыл бұрын

    I'm so excited, i actually understood this video the first time watching it!

  • @grayswandir47
    @grayswandir4711 жыл бұрын

    You still have to enrich uranium to make fuel for a breeder reactor that makes plutonium.

  • @domsusefulstuff
    @domsusefulstuff11 жыл бұрын

    Loved it. lol at the title. The second half saved it though. Can't wait to get to the new book, I'm still on the first one.

  • @Accordion_Jim
    @Accordion_Jim11 жыл бұрын

    I love these videos. It reminds me of the Eye Witness videos in grade school.

  • @ariez84
    @ariez8411 жыл бұрын

    Another interesting video as always.

  • @antonclaeys
    @antonclaeys11 жыл бұрын

    Very well explained!

  • @agneszhang14
    @agneszhang1411 жыл бұрын

    thank you~ I'll be waiting for it!!!

  • @MultiJonja
    @MultiJonja11 жыл бұрын

    Damn, best channel on KZread.

  • @Sizifus
    @Sizifus11 жыл бұрын

    Amazing video, once again.

  • @greenpogo
    @greenpogo11 жыл бұрын

    I'm sure there must be a good reason they don't use just one centrifuge and run the gas through it over and over... but I'm not sure why. :P Do they get increasingly faster or slower? If not couldn't that still be done with one centrifuge? Maybe that would just take forever. Great video though - maybe I'm just slow :P

  • @FixitFrank
    @FixitFrank11 жыл бұрын

    Both Process' were used. There were numerous cyclotrons built first using silver from the federal reserve because copper was needed for ammo. Gaseous diffusion came much later once the membranes were perfected.

  • @MUXmrk2
    @MUXmrk211 жыл бұрын

    Wow, very interesting, once again; well done.

  • @grayswandir47
    @grayswandir4711 жыл бұрын

    I was about to look up these details and saw your post.

  • @xxHazzardousxx
    @xxHazzardousxx11 жыл бұрын

    Good video, very informative.

  • @illsharp09
    @illsharp0910 жыл бұрын

    University of Illinois +1 whoop!

  • @quoabell
    @quoabell11 жыл бұрын

    the colors or the color distribution of the european map showed, was kinda ..interesting ^^ what were the initial purpose of the used map, if i may ask? :)

  • @billigerfusel
    @billigerfusel11 жыл бұрын

    well, that escalated quickly

  • @emikochan13
    @emikochan1311 жыл бұрын

    thanks for the clarification, i was just talking about the place that may get hit by nukes if things go wrong (as in the original post i was responding to). individuals and countries have differing goals...I have close friends from india, pakistan, iran and more, and i worry how the posturing of leaders will affect them :(

  • @AbandonedMaine
    @AbandonedMaine11 жыл бұрын

    It might be classified, but the knowledge to construct one is out there. I have a book by Friedwardt Winterberg on the Physical Principles of Thermonuclear Devices.

  • @rickisi
    @rickisi11 жыл бұрын

    Fat Man was a plutonium core implosion device. Little boy was used on the primary target as the gun type device while vastly less efficient was much more of a sure thing nuclear yield wise.

  • @sucrilhus
    @sucrilhus11 жыл бұрын

    Your videos are great!

  • @imgingi
    @imgingi11 жыл бұрын

    It's hard to listen to your amazing explanation and at the same time to read the somewhat long(er?) facts in the background. Otherwise, well done my friend.

  • @SEThatered
    @SEThatered11 жыл бұрын

    It might be, but such things as exact metal mixture for cylinder is a secret you can't get. The knowledge in those books covers the basics, but not the key elements, which are strictly classified.

  • @iliasasdf
    @iliasasdf11 жыл бұрын

    It's a small atomic bomb surrounded by hydrogen. The energy from the bomb delivered to the hydrogen triggers fusion (same thing that happens on the sun), which releases the enormous amounts of energy.

  • @BodoqueHavelange6483
    @BodoqueHavelange648311 жыл бұрын

    i love all your vídeos are awesome

  • @bendervie
    @bendervie11 жыл бұрын

    Totally blew my mind.

  • @Jay.M
    @Jay.M11 жыл бұрын

    I'd be interested in learning how we're able to record sound (and maybe even play it back) Could you do a video on how microphones work? :)

  • @tank7737
    @tank773711 жыл бұрын

    @CipherSon I think you're referring to his comment about how slight defects make them spin to pieces? The Stuxnet bug infected the motor control mechanisms of the rotors causing them to malfunction and fail. It is noted at the first "public" governmentally sponsored cyber attack. Though no one claims responsibility... the speculation is fascinating.

  • @emikochan13
    @emikochan1311 жыл бұрын

    it's common knowledge, doesn't make it easy to do without being spotted, the facilities are quite large.

  • @Brodes1983
    @Brodes198311 жыл бұрын

    Best. Subscription. Ever.

  • @Skeluz
    @Skeluz11 жыл бұрын

    Really interesting!

  • @gottimw
    @gottimw11 жыл бұрын

    when you build an expensive toy designed to disintegrate a lot of people you want it fast not cheap. Plus there is a lot of material to separate so you want a process where all your resulting material are the same grade. If you have separate centrifuges you might get different resulting grad materials.

  • @totoritko
    @totoritko11 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the correction, I misremembered Australia as being very inactive. However, large swaths of the inland are only low to moderately active (having recorded no M>5.0 quake in the last 100 years). The largest quakes in Australia are estimated to be up to around M7.0, something we can engineer around these days (like the Japanese do every day). Nevertheless, for practical purses, the closest sparsely populated low-activity areas outside would probably be Antarctica, NE China and Siberia.

  • @shadowblack1987
    @shadowblack198711 жыл бұрын

    Works great for me, every single time.

  • @TorosCanavari
    @TorosCanavari11 жыл бұрын

    I have just sent Turkish translation.

  • @N0Sdog
    @N0Sdog11 жыл бұрын

    awesome stuff

  • @redfive2008
    @redfive200811 жыл бұрын

    No, only the Little Boy dropped on Hiroshima used uranuim from gaseous diffusion. The Fat Man dropped on Nagasaki, and the first test device (the Gadget used in the Trinity test) were both more complex plutonium implosion devices.

  • @TheTopLogician
    @TheTopLogician11 жыл бұрын

    Which can be extracted, of course, and more easily than from the oxide waste of Fast Breeder or Light Water Reactors.

  • @MattDarez
    @MattDarez11 жыл бұрын

    I love this guy...

  • @kbeckend
    @kbeckend11 жыл бұрын

    Very much enjoyed the explanations and video. I'm curious as to why you did not mention electromagnetic separation which was the primary process that "produced" the 235 for Little Boy.

  • @playaspec
    @playaspec11 жыл бұрын

    Just because we do it often doesn't mean it's either cheap or easy.

  • @blahmonster1234
    @blahmonster123411 жыл бұрын

    How fast are the rotors in a centrifuge spinning?

  • @Xeogt
    @Xeogt11 жыл бұрын

    The first bombs were triggered by air pressure, since it was the only way to determine altitude in the bomb. They wanted to achieve an airburst for maximum killing potential, so it was set to explode 500 meters above the Japanese cities.

  • @IIoWoII
    @IIoWoII11 жыл бұрын

    Hmmm, I see. Btw, love your videos.

  • @etbadaboum
    @etbadaboum11 жыл бұрын

    What kind of material do we need to bombard U-2 with to split them?

  • @JackDander
    @JackDander11 жыл бұрын

    I'd like to have a nuclear powered microwave. In all seriousness though I came from the atomic clock/gps one and expected to hear about how the gps network detects nuclear explosions.

  • @Grarrgle
    @Grarrgle11 жыл бұрын

    I love the idea of tackling power grids and alternative energy. There is so much false information thrown about by all parties involved that it becomes very difficult for us lay-people to know what to believe. Storing wind energy, connecting new energy to grids, fluctuating power costs between night and day, etc. Would really love to see this dealt with. Thanks for all the videos though. No matter what you pick, it'll still be interesting either way.

  • @Just4FunGaming
    @Just4FunGaming11 жыл бұрын

    Can you do something about fusion?

  • @Anteum
    @Anteum11 жыл бұрын

    where can i buy a nice scale model like that?

  • @TheDarkFalcon
    @TheDarkFalcon11 жыл бұрын

    I might be wrong on this, but I believe that implosion bombs like Fat Man (the plutonium bomb dropped on Japan) are harder to manufacture for two reasons; The bomb itself is harder to make because it needs to be more precise (equal forse hitting it from every direction), and secondly weapons grade plutonium was harder to procure. This is why the Americans had never actually tested a plutonium implosion bomb before dropping it on Japan.

  • @CalabusDabus
    @CalabusDabus11 жыл бұрын

    Damnit Bill! You almost made me burn my chicken, stop being so interesting!

  • @WinstonMakes
    @WinstonMakes11 жыл бұрын

    EngineerGuy and Smarter Every Day should collab...

  • @Razzfazz87
    @Razzfazz8711 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the link. Still, do the USA or the other mentioned countries want to take the waste? I don't think Scandinavian countries want to take all the nuclear waste of Europe and nobody wants it transported passed their homes. They still chain themselves to the road when a transport is made in Germany. I know some of the suggested solutions but if it really was that easy there'd be no discussion about it.

  • @uniment
    @uniment11 жыл бұрын

    One word: Stuxnet.

  • @asianguy008
    @asianguy00811 жыл бұрын

    squashed between epicmealtime and secretagentbob, i feel smarter after watching this channel

  • @coilsinamotor
    @coilsinamotor11 жыл бұрын

    we really need more ppl like this on the dicovery channel XD

  • @ShaoloLLC
    @ShaoloLLC11 жыл бұрын

    I actually see the same out of sync issue over time. OSX Lion, Safari, HTML5 player.

  • @CamiloSanchez1979
    @CamiloSanchez197911 жыл бұрын

    It's actually a good thing that is difficult

  • @thedataflo
    @thedataflo11 жыл бұрын

    neet where can i get a model of this bomb ?

  • @squip88
    @squip8811 жыл бұрын

    Go Stuxnet!

  • @ryanthomastew
    @ryanthomastew11 жыл бұрын

    Great video! This could to explain to the average US Citizen (& congressman) why Iran's Nuclear Energy program can't easily/quickly be converted into a weapons grade U235 HEU program.I'm not sure how many times I hear US Reps spouting off that Iranian Scientists can "flip a switch" & start producing U235 practically overnight. I'm not saying the Iranians aren't but that going from 5% Low Grade to 90% high grade is a massive undertaking requiring tremendous energy-money-time

  • @skullkid960
    @skullkid96011 жыл бұрын

    May you please talk abut element 115 Ununpentium ;D

  • @WOGI5M
    @WOGI5M11 жыл бұрын

    What scale is that?

  • @hahahasan
    @hahahasan11 жыл бұрын

    love it :)

  • @randomtopix
    @randomtopix11 жыл бұрын

    Hey... that;s today!!!

  • @Muonium1
    @Muonium111 жыл бұрын

    I like the background music. It's quirky and appropriately unobtrusive.

  • @bradz7
    @bradz711 жыл бұрын

    try updating your browser and flash. will probably fix your problem.

  • @jackhong1981
    @jackhong198111 жыл бұрын

    I heard they are tearing down K-25 plant. They should allow us to visit the 40 acres plant...

  • @blahmonster1234
    @blahmonster123411 жыл бұрын

    Actually, the more you do something, generally speaking, the lower the cost and the better you get at doing it. We have been producing jet engines for many decades now, and we produce tens or hundreds of thousands more every year. By this point, it should be a pretty straightforward, relatively easy process to create things which spin at such high RPMs.

  • @Razzfazz87
    @Razzfazz8711 жыл бұрын

    The problem is less the possibility of the plant exploding but how to deal with the nuclear waste. The public is scared about many eyed fishes and accidents like Fukushima but from a natural disaster standpoint nuclear powerplants produce horrible waste which is difficult to store because we can't simply destroy it. In Germany we have old salt mines but imagine an earthquake cracking them up and letting water in. The ground water would be contaminated with very long living waste products.

  • @domsusefulstuff
    @domsusefulstuff11 жыл бұрын

    I'm sure his scientists already know. Better to make sure we all understand it I think.

  • @Sidewinded
    @Sidewinded11 жыл бұрын

    totally.

  • @waikashi
    @waikashi11 жыл бұрын

    must be jelly cuz jam don't shake

  • @Razzfazz87
    @Razzfazz8711 жыл бұрын

    It's not solving the problem it's merely postponing it. And it's postponing the solution because funding is taken from finding it. If you concentrate on easing the symptoms the illness doesn't get treated.

  • @BigAdam2050
    @BigAdam205011 жыл бұрын

    You demoralise a nation, you win. Fairly simple. If Mr.Japan on the front line finds out most of the people he knew has been turned to ash, why does he go on? He just lost anything he might have been fighting for.

  • @predvcecerom
    @predvcecerom11 жыл бұрын

    why didnt they ask Chuck Norris to separate it for them ?

  • @Jebu911
    @Jebu91111 жыл бұрын

    Now im gonna go and make a nuclear weapon plant tanks engineer guy!

  • @TheTopLogician
    @TheTopLogician11 жыл бұрын

    You got me on the reactor types. I had assumed that they branched from the fast breeder, but it turns out they're completely different. I should have done more research there. Yeah, thorium has its issues, like anything else, but I do think the biggest issue is that it's been ignored. Nixon shut down all thorium nuclear research in favor of fast breeding, which produces more fissionable plutonium for weapons. Now, we want the opposite. It's only logical that we reinvestigate.

  • @SillieWous
    @SillieWous11 жыл бұрын

    This didn't show up in my sub box=O

Келесі