I have found my new torts teacher, thank you for making it so much easier than law school. The examples are great. Please do more on scope of liability, causation etc.

@Harlem55

2 жыл бұрын

If you have problems with tort law, just wait till you get to cons law.

Great videos. Loved the bit of dance animation there!

@USLawEssentials

8 жыл бұрын

+Rajat Agrawal Thanks very much!

The concept is from Byrne v. Boadle in 1863. It wasn't a refrigerator, it was a barrel of flour from the second floor of a shop. In law school, we took "res (pronounced race) ipsa loquiter" to mean "If a barrel falls on your head, it's the other guy's fault."

Thanks for the easiest explaination.. it really helped me a lot to understand the concept in a short period.

brilliant!!! thank you for breaking this down and explaining

@USLawEssentials

7 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

thank you for explaining this so easily ♥️♥️♥️

@USLawEssentials

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching NS. Let me know if other topics interest you. uslawessentials.com/blog

Great video! Thank you for the concise and clear explanation.

@USLawEssentials

3 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

Actually entertaining n it was easy to understand in such beautiful animated way👍🏻

That dance moves though😂😂😂😂

From 2:19 to 2:38 is the best part and the entire summary of res ipsa loquitur.

Thank you for making these posts! Clearly explained! Greatly appreciated!

@USLawEssentials

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks, you can see more at uslawessentials.com

Hi, congratulations for this awesome work it helps me a lot!

@USLawEssentials

9 жыл бұрын

Sky Al Thanks! Stay tuned for updates. uslawessentials.com

This is the cutest law channel I've seen thumbs up for the little dancing Anime Girls and Anime Judge lol!

the voice over was extremely calming .

Well explained. Thank you ❤️ great example too 😊

@USLawEssentials

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks! uslawessentials.com

WELL EXPLAINED THANK U ...

this was helpful, thanks

Thank you very much!

@USLawEssentials

9 жыл бұрын

You're welcome. Good to hear from you.

Fantastic video

good video. thank you

On the white board (0m16s) we are told that we may presume that the defendant must have been careless. In the cartoon (2m32s) we are told that we may presume that the defendant had been careless. The word "must" is used in the first description of what may be presumed, but not in the second. Only the second seems to me to describe a rebuttable presumption. Clarification would be appreciated.

Thanks dude... So simple... Got it... ❤️

@USLawEssentials

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks Daypayan. More here: uslawessentials.com

You guys rock

thankyou very much .

@USLawEssentials

7 жыл бұрын

Sure!

Wowww so creative mates!

sir acha hai apka explanation

Even a child could understand! Brilliant and hilarious court dance moves! Wish I could sue Nike outlet for negligence.

On the question of physician-assisted suicide, could rest ipsa loquitur be used as an argument for why someone should be allowed the assistance? it seems to me quite reasonable that if someone asks for physician-assisted suicide, that the act itself rises above self preservation enough so that it should be honored automatically.

Amazing explanation, post more please. In particular on promissory estoppel? Thanks

@USLawEssentials

9 жыл бұрын

Hi Ami, 1. Here you are....kzread.info/dash/bejne/paaCpc2joZyWo6g.html 2. Thanks for your kind words. 3. I have a blog and forum where you can explore some more. The forum would greatly benefit from strong students who are studying US law and willing to share suggestions with students who are at a more basic level. More advanced students can also assist each other with trickier topics. Take a look please...uslawessentials.com/forum

@amidab9074

9 жыл бұрын

Ahhh u are literally amazing. Fantastic quality video excellent expertise I will definitely come back for more. Keep up the great work. Many thanks

Where are their arms and legs :-) Great video- love your way of teaching!

@shivaniverma8801

4 жыл бұрын

Ugh . I

How can it apply to a car accident,? Res ipsa liquitor vs doctrine of last clear chance....

Pls explain me this topic sir Malicious prosecution and nuicence

Can you please do videos that encompass Civil Procedure? JMOL, JNOV and preclusion doctrine? Thank you.

@USLawEssentials

10 жыл бұрын

DittyK, that's a helpful suggestion. I do have some videos on CivPro (kzread.info/head/PLRXyknBDMNN20dypjtwUqxlJqkacsHTUf) but will add to the playlist including Rules 50, 59 and preclusion.

@dittykins

10 жыл бұрын

USLawEssentials Sounds good, I appreciate it. The examples in your videos help me see how the black letter of the law is actually applied.

In the Case Miller vs Jacoby (2001), Does the fact that the defense did produce expert witness testimony negate a successful res ipsa loquitur outcome?

@USLawEssentials

8 ай бұрын

I didn't know the defendants produced expert testimony. Is that in the case?

Not to be confused with negligence per se

I am here for the sassy animation.

What if she has a visitor and that person did it

Plz put these videos as Tort playlist

@USLawEssentials

3 жыл бұрын

Hey there! I think this is on the playlist. Sorry if I’m mistaken.

The characters are cute

Isn't is Loquitur?

@USLawEssentials

5 жыл бұрын

I don't think so, but I'm happy to be corrected.

Les Ipso Loquitor shall be appropriate in mediation matters in the medical profession .Doctors would face negligence for treating a patient and charging for an ailment that never prevailed converting hospitals into profit making bodies. The noble profession has finally bedn included under the Consumer Act. Medical profession has been covered under tge Consumer Protection Act but does not cover government hospitals or government employees treated in private hospitals claiming from govt. So, patients are referred to pathologists and hospitals by govt. doctors. this was to introduced to make the service available convenient besides land lease agreement of hospital bldg etc. The question is how can you differentiate a patient as consumer and ine who is not a consumer merely on the basis of receiving payment. The next question that arises is the patient fies not pay for himself many times when on bed. Its from his account, his guardian who pays for him. How can a civil servant who has entered into a service contract includes medical benefits not be a consumer. The govt. may provide private or public facility is its policy. The doctors are paid from revenue . How do insurance companies deal with it?

@kevinisek3282

5 жыл бұрын

They have spun quite the web, haven't they?

brb taking that fridge thats on my roof down

It means "The thing speaks for itself." Lawyers like to talk strangely.

love from bangladesh 🇧🇩

Ts anyc one,thnx

So, I'll answer the question at hand-What is res ipsa loquiter? The thing or transaction speaks for itself. What can I tell you you have to have a halo over your head.

All the debbies have disliked the video 😂

Who's here because of Johnny Depps tattoo? (And the trial against Amber Turd)

Z

why the anime characters tho 🥴

The pronunciation made me cringe but good information.

Your injured plaintiff dancing in court when the verdict went her way is wholly inappropriate.

everything was right but animation is disgusting sir💀