Great video! I used your old one to help frame the importance of communication in the workplace. Senior leaders I've worked with often think of the transmission model of communications. This is a new concept for many of them.

Congratulations for 2.0 version. I have used this video in every introductory session.

I just added the old video to my module on org comm on Friday. I'm so glad to see an updated one!

Love this revised video. Much easier for students to grasp.

@CommProfProductions

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Debbie! We certainly tried to make several improvements, so glad to hear you're students grasp this better~

I'm an incoming college student and this happens to be the course I'll be taking up. Thanks a lot for this video. It was helpful somehow.

Great stuff, Matt. Well done. I was made aware of this from Ryan Bisel's Linkedin post about it. Great stuff.

@CommProfProductions

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks Alex!

Thoughtful and thought-provoking video! I'll be showing this to my org comm students today.

This is great! Thanks, Matt!

This is great for my human services administrative course.

What a clear, concise, easy to understand lecture! Thank you for the video, Prof!

@CommProfProductions

2 жыл бұрын

You're welcome...glad you enjoyed the video :-)

...... " WOW! " ........... ...... Thanks for your efforts ....

It really helps! Thx!

Good one

Correct me if I am wrong, from what I have understood, organizational communication is inherently a constitutional framework of an organization defined through the use of concepts of communication.

@CommProfProductions

2 жыл бұрын

I think that sounds pretty good

Does somebody know wether Koschmann agrees with Feldner & Fykes (2018) approach of the conventional approach? And I would argue that Koschmann agrees with Ryan Bisel (2010), in terms of materialism and objects centered around communication. Where does this put Nicotera (2020)? is Koschmann placing himself in the middle of Feldner & Fyke and Nicotera? I would argue that Nicotera agrees with Feldner & Fyke in terms of process and structure? Does anybody know of this?

Am i correct to rewrite much ideas on my eesay Regardinh effective communication lead to competitive advantage in Logstics industry

Let me challenge the idea that tables and chairs have "no inherent meaning ,apart for our interactions with each other". Cheap shitty chairs communicate that you ( or your role) are not valued.

@CommProfProductions

2 жыл бұрын

Good point Brandon. But consider: how exactly do cheap chairs do that without human intention and interpretation? The point is that chairs can only communicate value within a communication process that coveys values, beliefs, and norms about status--there's nothing in the materiality of the chair itself that does this apart from human interaction and involvement. This relates to the fascinating concepts of sociomaterialtiy and hybrid agency. Lots of nuanced perspectives within these concepts, but a great place to start if you want to dig deeper~

@angelabrasil3900

2 жыл бұрын

Interesting point Brandon. I feel that judging the furniture may say more about the person doing the judging than the actual value of the personnel in the company. Additionally, there is the concept that, culturally, the expectation for a meeting may not include sitting. There are so many caveats to consider. IE: What if the person coming in was blind? Would the state of the chairs count then?

you will need to start using real life examples in your videos otherwise it gets more confusing as it gets longer.

@aluay

Жыл бұрын

true, unless there is a measurable framework, the conventional approach remains the better way

What are the two approaches? I can't merely hear it clearly.

@CommProfProductions

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Gladys...the two approaches are (1) communication IN organizations and (2) organizations AS communication Hope that helps!

it would be great to have a practical example. For the conventional, there are a lot of examples

Viscom students 🙋🏻‍♂️