Regardless of what is said of Kant in this video--positive or negative--, the fact that the first 13 of the 25 minutes of it has been marked "intro" is itself/by-itself/in-and-for-itself etc. etc., incontrovertibly Kantian.

Huge problem rooted in Aristotle and the demise of great western philosophy of Protagoras , Heraclitus and Plato. The concept of indifference is explained ontologically in The Bhagavta Gita , because The Gita defies Binary Aristotelian logic .so in the Monism-of Parmenides or Bhagvad Gita our world is a possibility of the ontological monism , not the other way around.The entirewestern critique of Plato brought out by the west , misses that the world of forms is the reality in which our mundane participates .by reversing this given world as the only possibility as actuality , dogmatism takes root . Whatever the European thinks becomes universal This the justification of terror of the westerner in eradicating non European cultures . Ontologically the seed of violence is rooted in this Kantian thinking it is consistent with his flawed co space,time A-priori but matter not A-priori The entire a Project of Kant is originally sincere to justify objectivity and yet retain the activity of the subject But very soon it reverts to th3 flaws of Aristotle , and cannot justify visceral empiricism. Kant has vet little respect for j inductive logic at fir due diligence as much is written about A-priori

In a word Kant is epistemologically flawed because Aristotle’s as well He is however more dangerous , as he takes Aristotelian ethnocentrism to a different level Now in the Parmenidian Advaita view this ethnocentricism as dogmatism . In calculus as well one approaches infinity but dies not get there .the obsession for apodeictic certainty is the theological fetishized of both Aristotle and Kant