The Apostle Paul REPEATEDLY says that those that worship Christ are Israel. Somehow they ignore every reference to Christians being the Israel of God, as Paul said, 'Not all who call themselves Israel are Israel." "And do not presume to say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' For I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham." Matthew 3:9.

@AnathemaMysticalcel

Жыл бұрын

This would also make the statement in revelation make sense. "I know those who say they are jews but are not".

@pcjenkin

Жыл бұрын

@@AnathemaMysticalcel Agreed. Dispensationalists give 'lip-service' only to the Books of Galatians, Hebrews, Romans, while purposely misinterpreting Revelations. Dispensationalist interpretations lead to stark contradictions. Example: "I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers, so that you will not be conceited: A hardening in part has come to Israel, until the full number of the Gentiles has come in. And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written: “The Deliverer will come from Zion; He will remove godlessness from Jacob." Romans 11:25-26. Dispensationalist say that this points to the future earthly kingdom of Israel when ALL will come to the Lord. However, 2 chapters earlier say something COMPLETELY different: "Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved:" Romans 9:27.

@AnathemaMysticalcel

Жыл бұрын

@@pcjenkin I totally agree with you. But I will make the whole arguement as simple as possible. What makes "Israel" Israel? Chapter 19 of Exodus states: "if you obey my voice, you will be a peculiar nation, a chosen people." If you are obeying God you are Israel, the great commission, is fulfillment of the old testament prophecies that God would gather his people from the nations. It is so much simpler then calvanistic dispensationalists make it. Professing them selves wise they become fools.

@chrismachin2166

Жыл бұрын

@@AnathemaMysticalcel “Calvanistic”! 😂

@Isaiah_Cochran

Жыл бұрын

Two natures of Israel.

I’m studying Eschatology and I’m a dispensationalist after intense research/study I appreciate you covering this subject matter

@SpotterVideo

3 күн бұрын

New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many modern Christians cannot honestly answer the questions below? Who is the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Who is the “son” that is the “heir” to the land in Matthew 21:37-43? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary? What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below. Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8, 3:16? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. 1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. God is not now a “racist”. He has extended His love to all races of people through the New Covenant fulfilled by His Son’s blood at Calvary. The Apostle Paul warned against using “genealogies” in our faith in 1 Tim. 1:4, and Titus 3:9. The following verses prove the Holy Spirit is the master teacher for those now in the New Covenant. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. 1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. Watch the KZread videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay. Watch the KZread video "Genesis of Dispensational Theology", if you want to see the original source of the doctrine. The main error of the doctrine is the claim God did not fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary. It ignores the words of Jesus in John 19:30.

“Literally” until the Lord’s Supper is mentioned.

I'm confused. By literal, do you include figurative? Because there were a lot of messianic prophesies about Jesus. Like, he would take our heart of stone and give us a heart of flesh. Did he literally do that or is that a metaphor? Or, "he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel". Also, Why only look at messianic prophesies and not the rest of prophesy which is full of allegory and metaphor? And why would we think language is only meant to be taken literally? What about poetry? Jesus spoke in Parables. The disciples asked him why he doesn't speak plainly but in metaphor. He said we should drink his blood and eat his flesh. Hopefully not literal. Is literalism different than what I think it is? One last thing. Just because something is not taken literally doesn't mean someone can pull out any meaning they want from it. The metaphor is in there and it is meant to be taken out by those who want the truth.

@christopherhughey3186

3 ай бұрын

Truth has been spoken. Thank you.😊

@edwardwicks304

2 ай бұрын

Excellent comments. Excellent questions. I wish that I could give you more than one like. 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

@ryrocks9487

2 ай бұрын

Good question.

@drewclifton610

Ай бұрын

Thank you.

@Taeruthayan

Ай бұрын

No wonder you're confused, didn't he say especially prophecy, and then explains that every prophecy relating to Christ's birth, ministry, death and resurrection were fulfilled literally. It's so off base to suggest that parables and poetry and allegories are to be taken literally as well. If one uses allegory to explain something else, you cannot but take it as not being literal. Context is key! That is how language works. Cheers.

Thank you so much. Great explanation.

Thank you for this!

Yes to ALL. Thank you.

clear and straightforward

Pastor Andy Wood gives a very Biblical understanding of dispensationalism in the study of Genesis. It makes total sense. I believe God does not break His promises.

@jacksonrelaxin3425

7 ай бұрын

“Makes sense” says the guy getting paid to say something lol

@tomtemple69

6 ай бұрын

Romans 9: 6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; 7 nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but: “through Isaac your descendants will be named.” 8 That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants.

@uchennanwogu2142

6 ай бұрын

Galatians 3:29

@telefellavision

4 ай бұрын

​@@jacksonrelaxin3425I know right. It sounds like some "trust me bro" religion.

@telefellavision

4 ай бұрын

You're absolutely right! God does not break his promises. And he's fulfilling it through Jesus christ. This dispensationalism and it's twisted theology is exactly why it's a salvation issue because they are proclaiming that there's the body of Christ which is all Jews and gentiles that are saved and then there's the Jews that are not saved which are still being considered by them God's chosen and that they don't have to go through Jesus to receive salvation because of the promise. But that contradicts everything Jesus said which is nobody comes to the father except through Him. It's really dangerous out there and it's best just to allow the holy spirit to guide you through the word. Or at least find people that you trust. Constantly pray for discernment because I just learned about this a week ago and I thought I knew everything about the deceptions of the world that's going on. Just when you think you have it all figured out the Holy Spirit shows you otherwise. God bless

Many who claim to take God's Word literally don't take the words, "soon", "shortly", "quickly" or "this generation" literally.

@thegospelofchristsaves7174

2 жыл бұрын

In each case you need to look at what the context of those words mean. Also it helps to know the original intent of the author. Soon can either mean "in a short time" or "what will happen next". Shortly means shortly but in what context is it used? In which part? That will determine its meaning. For example in Revelation, an angel says these things must shortly take place. That is more a period of a short time. But the book of Revelation from chapters 4 to 19 focus on visions of John on what will take place in the future. Quickly referenced by the words of Jesus in Revelation 22 mean not that I will return quickly, but rather that when I return it will happen quickly. In other words, David took a while when he became king to when he ruled over Israel. Jesus is saying when He returns, it will happen quickly. The return itself will not take long from Heaven to Earth. There is a difference between Immanence and short time frame. Immanence means it could happen at anytime, short time means it WILL happen shortly. Dispensationalists believe in the immanence of the return which means nothing has to happen for the rapture to take place except the last gentile coming to faith in Jesus. Hope this helps.

@pcjenkin

2 жыл бұрын

Also, "At Hand."

@JustinVK

2 жыл бұрын

Amen amen amen!

@neilnolte2587

2 жыл бұрын

@@thegospelofchristsaves7174 I didn't need help, thank you. Revelation 1:3 says, "Blessed is the one who reads, and those who hear the words of the prophecy and keep the things which are written in it; for the time is near." Chapters 4-19 are included in that prophecy. "for the time is near." This is the reason they were blessed for reading it. Scripture is always a blessing, but in their case, it saved their lives! Partial preterists don't need any hermeneutical gymnastics to explain words that don't fit the narrative. Understanding comes much easier to me now. I love my brothers and sisters in Christ and pray that each one would find truth in God's Word and so be blessed.

@Pinky_1775

2 жыл бұрын

@@neilnolte2587 Your generalist statement about words needed help as some who would read it would not in any way understand what you meant by it. You quote the Bible with "Blessed is the one who reads," which is true, but ignorant is the one who spouts wourds out of emotion without forthought.

Thank you for this very succinct but thorough explanation!

Listening to this talk, I can see how Matthew 24:24 is being and will continue to be fulfilled. I was raised dispensational and started asking questions at 9 years old after the church camp I went to wouldn't let any of us children leave the evening service until we all spoke in tongues.. At 9 years old!. I quit asking after years of being brow beat by Christians, including my family members. I never lost faith in God though, just men! I learned to study the bible for myself, and I'm still learning as the Holy Spirit wills it. Read read read, pray pray pray people, stop listening to men! THANK YOU JESUS!

@styles3349

Ай бұрын

i was enticed with the teaching of dispensational, however i felt something was really off,. they lack the spirit of Love and it only made me confused.

Thank you so much for posting this I really enjoyed it it makes the most sense to me 🙂 Jesus loves you ❤️

Pastor Nelson you didn't say if dispensationalism was or wasn't Biblical. But thank you for your many videos. Lord bless you.

@solitarypawn5076

2 жыл бұрын

Dispensationalism is not biblical. To make it look like one, they ignore the covenants of the Bible and replace it manufactured beliefs. Don’t get tied up with lies.

@SpotterVideo

2 жыл бұрын

The following proves it is not Biblical. Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Galatians 3:8) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 10. Watch the KZread video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church: “The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?

@LilPeeper420

2 жыл бұрын

How to rightly divide. 2 Timothy 2:15 King James Version 15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. Church age(faith alone) Galatians 2:16 - Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Romans 4:5 - But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. 1st rapture(pretribulation/before tribulation) 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 King James Version 16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: 17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. 1st judgment(judgment seat of Christ)-good or bad 2 Corinthians 5:10 King James Version 10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad. 1 Corinthians 3:13-15 King James Version 13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is. 14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. 15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire. ----------------- Tribulation(works, not just faith) John.2:22-26 kjv 22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? 23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. 24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only. 25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way? 26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also. 2nd judgment (great white throne judgment) Revelation.8:3-4 Kjv 3 And another angel came and stood at the altar, having a golden censer; and there was given unto him much incense, that he should offer it with the prayers of all saints upon the golden altar which was before the throne. 4 And the smoke of the incense, which came with the prayers of the saints, ascended up before God out of the angel's hand. Revelation 20:11-15 KJV And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. In conclusion Jesus raptures the church and we meet in the clouds. Tribulation saints endure to the end, dying for Christ’s witness, and rejecting the mark. On top of that they are gathered out of the angels hands, after they have been killed And then it’s the 2nd coming at the very very end Each man his his own order •Order of Raptures 1 Corinthians Chapter 15 22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. 24 Then [cometh] the end, We leave when Christ comes for us, they endure to the end. It’s simple the more you read the more you learn. If you haven’t opened the Bible how do you expect to learn it, learn from others? Doctrine of man, is doctrine of devils. Man has a deceitful heart Jeremiah 17:9-10 King James Version 9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? 10 I the Lord search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings.

@jthanrubio1126

Жыл бұрын

@@LilPeeper420 There are major wholes to dispensational viewpoints (which most modern theologians have concluded is unbiblical). The Torah wasn't given to Goyim (Gentiles), it was given to Israel. Yet, you can be grafted into Israel in the present age still (faith). Further, you cannot believe in dual covenant theology (which dispensationalism requires) and believe Yeshua fulfilled ALL promises to Israel at the same time. This would create a contradiction of fallacy pertaining to the blessing due only to the Messiah. And this contradiction would literally rob Yeshua of His glory! In essence, either you believe we are new creations in Yeshua, a holy united people, or you believe that Yeshua didn't quite get over the finish line, and there is still some work to be done on His part to fulfill His promise to Israel. There's so much more to write, but the conundrum of robbing Yeshua of His glory precludes the necessity to continue critiquing a theology originating from a little Irish girl's dream.

@TechCody113

Жыл бұрын

there was a word called Dispension, which mean to give, that was the original Dictionary meaning in Bible, Bible also says he dispensed his grace, but the word dispensationalism was made 100 years ago and teaches that god changes with the ages, he DELT with people different but gods original plan never changes

Absolutely perfect presentation! Thank you!😁

Funny, I only read about God’s covenants in the Bible. These are the various promises God makes and they inform man how God will interact with his creation. I missed the Scripture references that explain (exegete) the various dispensations.

@wydopnthrtl

9 ай бұрын

No you didn't... cause they aren't there! 😆

Great explanation.

Even the old testament people were saved through Christ so I don´t know what´s the deal there. There´s one God, Triune, and one Saviour of the whole world, Christ Jesus. May God save us from false preachings and leaders who won´t seek to preach the truth.

Great explaination. Well done.

Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that’s needeth not to be ashamed, RIGHTLY DIVIDING the WORD OF THRUTH. 2tim. 2:15

@GetAGripBro

Жыл бұрын

Always great to quote things from someone else’s mail that you didn’t see the other side of and weren’t there for and weren’t alive during the time it was written. Especially in the classic old English that Timothy absolutely definitely wrote it in. 1500 year old first version translations from a dead form of Greek are so so perfect, why even question it ya know?

@JC_Denton

Жыл бұрын

@@GetAGripBro bruh.

@GetAGripBro

Жыл бұрын

@@JC_Denton whoops

@irreducibleBoogie

5 ай бұрын

​@@GetAGripBroThen don't quote or use words from anybody you haven't literally met or were alive during the time that they wrote anything; such a stupid argument😂

@GetAGripBro

5 ай бұрын

@@irreducibleBoogie A little late on this one. Go cry somewhere else

Thanks so much for this straightforward explanation. Google’s explanation went right over my head.

@johnmcguire4635

Жыл бұрын

Probably went over the heads of most of those likely to believe dispensationalism

@ulidrea5760

9 ай бұрын

Dispensationalismus is 100 % biblical !!!

@anthonylowder6687

8 ай бұрын

@@johnmcguire4635 Not me!!!

@firstnamelastname-yv5rp

4 ай бұрын

@@ulidrea5760 yes it is Biblical 📖.

@janusg8680

3 ай бұрын

The explanation in the video was not straightforward. A lot of fallacies.

Excellent explanation ...

He said he would use the Bible but never read from it

@SpotterVideo

2 жыл бұрын

Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Galatians 3:8) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 10. Watch the KZread video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church: “The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?

@fortis6258

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, good observation. I am still on the fence about the "Got Questions" website.

@MrGreen-fi5sg

2 жыл бұрын

Swear these false preachers couldn't tell you 5 verse from the bible.

@Mabbus4

Жыл бұрын

Great reply! I agree. I'm preaching on those verses in Romans 11 in a couple of weeks mind if I use some of this information to quote? Especially like the replacement theology comparisons and the quotes from the Dallas crowd.

@SpotterVideo

Жыл бұрын

@@Mabbus4 Feel free to use anything which you find helpful, including the following. New Covenant Whole Gospel: Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) Watch the KZread videos “The New Covenant” by Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.

How can there be two peoples of God in the world when Paul clearly taught that there is only one people of God, as it was written "13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ.14 For he himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility," Eph.2, and "By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear." Heb.8:13 and Gal.6:15-16, "15 Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is the new creation. 16 Peace and mercy to all who follow this rule-to the Israel of God."

This was helpful.

Thanks so much for you very clear explanation. Even as a novice, however, I can't help but question your commitment to "all things literal" when large passages of the bible are song (poetry) that focus on the heart and large portions are apocalyptic and by definition contain many symbols that are not meant to be taken literally. According to "all things literal" the pregnant woman and red dragon of Rev 12 will be a woman and a real dragon? Do I have that right?

@jennifercrawford7129

5 ай бұрын

Hello. I just have a comment that helped me. Let the Bible interpret itself either in the passages before or after (context), or in the same book (near text) or remote text (found in another part of the Bible-in another book. A word search sometimes helps). Discern what is 'Like and As' when scripture describes it like that, as in Revelation. We know when John says 'Behold the Lamb of God', Jesus isn't a 4 legged animal but a picture/type. When the literal sense makes sense, give it no other sense. Most of Psalms is prophetic scripture that will be fulfilled in the future. A lot of prophetic Scripture also has duel fulfillment. It has happened in the past but will also be fulfilled in the future. 2 Tim 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth. 🙂

@mariaa8224

5 ай бұрын

​@jennifercrawford7129 this is very helpful. Thank you for sharing!🙏🏼

@robertdavidson9674

5 ай бұрын

@@jennifercrawford7129 Dual fulfillment? In Matthew 24:2 Jesus is answering the question of when the stones of Herod's temple would be torn down, and in 24:21 He says that this would be accomplished during the Great Tribulation by the Roman soldiers: "But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies then recognize that her desolation is at hand" (Luke 21:20). We know in hindsight that that happened in 70 a.d. right after the Christian Jews fled from the city. In Mt 24:21 Jesus said that THAT was the "great tribulation" and that there would never be a worse tribulation in the future. So if you believe the words of Jesus there cannot be a dual fulfillment of the 70 a.d. great tribulation. It boils down to this: Do you believe the words of Jesus or the words of Cyrus Scofield, the founder of dispensationalism?

@1754Me

4 ай бұрын

@@jennifercrawford7129 Can you show me anywhere in the New Testament where the apostles declare that an OT prophecy was fulfilled once in Christ and then there will be a second ("dual") fulfillment at a later time? Anywhere?

@JacksonScott-os7kj

3 ай бұрын

I wonder if the guy in the video would believe the Lords supper is truly Jesus' body and blood lol, since Jesus said it was.

Beautiful explanation.

@SpotterVideo

3 күн бұрын

Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the word “remnant” in Romans 9:27, with the word “nation”? 6. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 7. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 8. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 9. Based on Hebrews 12:18-24, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 10. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 11. Watch the KZread video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church: “The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? (See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.) Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period? Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.

What is the difference between historical premillenialism and dispensationalism?

@matthewbrown9029

2 жыл бұрын

@royal priest thank you

I believe God calls me to abide to have faith in Him, to have in hope for the second coming and to be charitable through love. I believe I have a mission to spread the message of salvation. Anything that doesn't directly help me relate that message, means very little to me. I find peace in praying to God about my lack of understanding for biblical history and theology. I have read and listened to a lot of discussions about these topics, never have I found peace through another man's explanation, only in prayer to God.

Reformed theology teaches that when God told Abraham he would make him the father of many nations and it would be an everlasting covenant that God didn’t really mean it but he was lying.

@TheNationOfTexas

27 күн бұрын

One of the things I think a lot of people miss is that God said he’d make a NATION. He didn’t create a new race of people. Just like the Western Europeans who settled America. A nation was created, not a race.

@CustomBlocks

15 күн бұрын

Not at all- we believe in the covenant of grace that was established then which is the same covenant we’re under now

I would push back slightly on subjective private interpretation caused by not taking a literal approach. Whether you believe the fall was caused through Adam and Eve eating literal fruit tempted by an actual reptile or you believe the fruit was sin in general and Satan was speaking as Satan does today but metaphorically described as a snake, you still have to deal with the same conclusion. Literalism and mytho-history bring us to the same places, same realities, same principles. For example, if someone believed Jonah was an allegory pointing to Christ rather than a literal historical figure (based on Nineveh, timelines and populations), it doesn’t steal from what Jonah ultimately points to. Christ resurrecting. I don’t take this view of Jonah but have friends who do, and ultimately we still come to the same conclusions. Just some thoughts. Great video!

@danielwarton5343

2 жыл бұрын

Hi. Have you listened to Abner Chou’s lectures on christocentric hermeneutics? Not every passage in scripture is to be taken as an allegory for Christ. Yes, there are types, like Jonah but we read the scriptures as the authors intended their writings to be read. The reason I say this is that although the example of Jonah is good there are other ones that lead to replace,ent theology and applying all scriptures about Israel onto the church.

@emknight72

2 жыл бұрын

No one knows what the serpent was. Remember, God cursed the serpent after the fall and made it what it is today. Some have suggested that it was an upright being with legs. Even an intellect, though not human. “Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.”

@trevorjameson3213

2 жыл бұрын

@@emknight72 It's also important to note that the Hebrew word for "snake" or "serpent" had two connotations; one being 'deceiver' and the other being 'shining' or 'shining one'. There is a fascinating lesson from a well-respected ancient Hebrew scholar, Dr. Michael Heiser

Amen 🙏🏻

If the word "dispensation" refers to a period of time, when is the time period of God as mentioned in Colossians 1:25. The passage states, "Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God;" The passage parallels Ephesians 3:2, which reads, "If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward:" Is the dispensation of grace limited to the church age? Noah found grace in the OT. Could it be that the word "dispensation" refers a dispensing of something like a covenant? A paper towel dispenser dispenses paper towels. The covenants would be a better method of understanding the dispensing of the selected covenant. The church or Gentiles are strangers to the covenants. What think ye?

@Scripturesdude6361

5 ай бұрын

The word dispensation could also mean stewardship. It has nothing to do with a period of time. Does this help you?

My flesh is real food and my blood is real drink

@n.d.6430

7 ай бұрын

You have to use your brain too . Where you see literal reading take it literally or symbolic reading that is symbolic . Have You never read that church replaced Israel !! no! Look now what's happening in Israel ! It's being set up for ez 38&39 .

The Bible does not teach dispensation, nor the Rapture.

@hismajesty6272

Ай бұрын

Amen man

Dispensationalism also argues God saves people differently throughout time (Abraham was saved differently by faith, Moses was saved by the law, We are saved by Jesus) which argues God is ever-changing and constantly changing his mind. I believe God is the same yesterday today and forever. God does not change his mode of salvation. Jesus says no one enters the kingdom of heaven except through me. If Jesus is not lying then that means Abraham Moses and we must all enter through him, proving God does not change his mode of salvation

@Ghee19

11 ай бұрын

No that’s not correct

@KeepingWatch95

8 ай бұрын

You are very, very correct. John 8:57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? John 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

Robert breaker explains dispensations really well. I highly recommend him to watch

@gregorylatta8159

9 ай бұрын

Breaker is a Ruckman hyper dispensationalism teacher. They teach the faith/works in other dispensations unto salvation heresy.

@coderc5753

9 ай бұрын

@@gregorylatta8159 his teachings make the most sense to me personally. I’m open to learning everything I can. I’ve just Recently been saved so I’m still learning as much as possible.

@WW3_Soon

3 ай бұрын

@@gregorylatta8159They believed that faith plus works applied to the Old Testament and to the upcoming Tribulation Period. In today’s dispensation of the grace of God, salvation is by faith alone in the Lord Jesus Christ. No heresy at all.

The only way to understand what appears to be a contradiction in the word of God because there (are none) is to understand dispensationalism, Like I’ve told other who doubt find out why apostle Paul uses the word in the New Testament and the context behind it brothers and sisters.. let the Lord lead you, God bless you all in Christ.

What this video leaves out is a dispensationalist believes that the gospels, and the things Jesus taught only applied to Israel, not to you or me. They only hold to pauline epistles as what is to us. 🤦🏻‍♂️ this is heresy.

The prophecy of Elijah with regards of John being a type of Elijah is not literal

Of course no scripture given to back up any of these claims.

how biblical can a system invented in the 1800s created by a false be?

No wonder why everyone is confused.

I have listened to talks with dispensationalists and covenant theologians. They seem to be saying the same things almost. The covenant theologians also believe in different covenants that God made with His people, like different dispensations. The major difference comes when the covenant is seen to apply only to the church and all future promises made distinctly to Israel are then interpreted as being spiritual and for the church. As John MacArthur says, Israel gets all the curses and none of the blessings. Israel was always going to reject messiah the first time, it’s the only way our sins could be paid. Even the proto-evangelion in Genesis 3:15 shows that Christ was always doing to die and the rejection of Israel was always on the plan. They’ve not been replaced because of the nation of Jews rejecting Christ.

@The_noticing

9 ай бұрын

So did Christ only die for the sins of the Israelites or everyone? It's not replacement, it's still the everlasting covenant that was promised to Abraham. Israelites just aren't separated anymore.

I greatly appreciate your ministry. Would you not consider historic premillennialism as one of literal interpretation?

The problem with the "literal" point he brings up is that it seems to ignore the incorporation of exegesis, which might affect interpretation in a less than literal manner.

Is Israelites and Jews different?

@robertschultz9623

Жыл бұрын

The Jews come from Judah, one of the 12 tribes of Israel. Many cases in the OT where God separated Judah from Israel (my ot history is very rusty) as a separate nation. It is the accepted belief that the Jews are all that remain of the 12 tribes due to interracial breeding of the other tribes.

These are lies. He may not know it but these are lies.

PS: the word god, as a word, is a title of office. Any individual in that office can carry the title of that office. Note then that "is One" and "as One" are two different statements.

Great explanation but to what level is it biblical? I’m still confused

@wydopnthrtl

9 ай бұрын

It can only been seen if we ignore some verses and pay attention to others. Taking all of them... we see only laws plus covenants. Not differing laws for different people at different times.

You think your interpretation of “what it says” is the same as mine? How about the more than 700 different languages it has been translated to. If it’s a rapture you’re subscribing to, you’re missing the point. Love is the fulfillment of the law.

Amen.

I've been taught that the Old Testament Israel foreshadows the New Testament Israel. Jesus set up the New Testament Israel as the church. We are the church (spiritually speaking) and therefore, we are spiritual Israel. Therefore, there are only 2 dispensations: Old and New!

Language is so precise that the scriptures were WRITTEN to a world that was illiterate!

No1 Take a hermeneutics class No2 read Ephesians 10times until you realize that Christian gentiles an Christian Jew's are ONE in Christ. It's so strainious to get ideas of the last century out of people's mind. . .

WOW.. I AM STILL CONFUSED... LOL

I'm so confused. I wish I could understand this.... I came here researching Dispensationalists. Whew... over my head haha.

@lindseykeizerweerd8204

8 ай бұрын

David o'steen from hope bible church explains it very good. Check out his channel

@theTavis01

2 ай бұрын

it doesn't make any sense, specifically because it's a false made-up teaching

It's so good to know that Jesus is literally a lamb with seven horns and seven eyes! All this time I thought he was a man . . . silly me!

How about song of songs being literal??

@elijahdiaz9794

8 ай бұрын

Not everything is taken literally,but literally is the best and usually the go to way of concerning all things Bible related

What about when Jesus was referred to as a cornerstone??? That wasn’t literal.

that's fair

There were some things that were guaranteed on condition of obedience and some things promised apart from any conditions. It seems to me that God formed Israel from the man Abraham as a means to the end, Christ. I am still trying to learn though

Thanks for this. Everything was clear except for your "literalism " spiel. Are you sayin metaphor and imagery in prophecy should be taken as literal? That makes zero sense. Is Jesus a plant stem because he is called the root and stem of Jesse? That literalism part is unworkable in any human mind unless you change themeaning of the Englis word "literal". 🤔 Otherwise, this was enlightening and helpful for me to understand dispensationalists, of which i am _definitely not one.

I don't disect God's word. The Bible is entire. I don't select a portion and ASSUME that I am only meant to apply only a portion of it. We are told NOT TO ADD TO- NOR TAKE AWAY. The idea that the Bible and it's meaning is a platform for man to pick apart and apply what fits us due to our time frame and to apply MANs theories of it as a whole to me, serves as so counterproductive and seperatist that it grieves the truth in that the Lord speaks to us through it. Bith Paul and Jesus made reference to God's law in the old testament , NOT The add ons of pharisees. Sadly, if it a seperatism and adds confusion- We should understand that God is NOT the author of confusion. God does NOT make mistakes and grace has been given mankind since day one of our existance. It is BY FAITH through grace in Christ Jesus that we are saved. Bless us all Lord and show us the way to understand YOU not by words of men or scholars, science, or theorists- but by your Holy Spirit in the reading and continual prayer of what YOU provide for us daily. In Jesus Christ I pray, Amen

While he tries to take on a lot of hard topics, this guy does not know how to teach a point of theology without just explaining what it is and where it comes from without giving his opinion on it's Biblical truth (or lack there of) throughout the explanation. As a good teacher of the Bible and theology you need to be able to help people understand the basic facts (non disputable) before you get to the "is it biblical" (very disputable).

all the promises of God are yes and amen in Christ checkmate

@hismajesty6272

Ай бұрын

So by this interpretation of scripture, the Body and Blood of God are truly present in Communion, right?

@jacktrimble5987

Ай бұрын

@@hismajesty6272 no thats Lutheranism

So is the answers from got questions dispensationalist in nature?

Dispensationalism seems to highlight ethnic Israel more than it highlights the True Israel of God, the Lord Jesus Christ who has torn down the dividing wall between Jew and Gentile and has unified all those who he has redeemed creating one new man as preordained by God and foretold by Sacred Scriptures.

@sambee4927

2 ай бұрын

Not really. It just seems to be that way because after the fiasco of 1600+ years of the gentiles aka the Age of Conscience, God began to move again and formed a nation that is ethnically distinct and gave His promises to them during the Age of Promise. They failed, spectacularly, and out of the gentiles and the Jews, God formed the Church, which is the focus in the present Dispensation, the Age of Grace. He will fulfil the promises He made to Abraham in the Millennial Kingdom, which is physically peopled by the Jews and gentiles, but ruled by the Church, who are kings and priests and are already in their glorified bodies and are able to travel dimensions. The Jews and the gentiles will also reign in a lesser capacity as hinted in the gospels, so essentially during the Millennial Kingdom, the Church, Israel, and the gentiles are going to reign with Christ for a thousand years. What a glorious era that will be!

@AgeDeo2009

2 ай бұрын

@@sambee4927 Thank you for sharing your thoughts, my friend. But do kindly provide Scriptural basis for this so we can all carefully study it. Thank you, again.

Did he answer his question? About it being biblical?

@firstnamelastname-yv5rp

4 ай бұрын

yep, its Biblical 📖 .

You can see this is truth because it's how scripture is set out, how history as been set out our present time and future to come, Israel and the Church. It's like taking a bird's eye view on human past present and future. It's nothing to be arguing about. . 🙄

@J.J.-hz5fv

7 ай бұрын

It's a heresy so there's plenty here to argue about.

false doctrine that is running rampant in the Church, there is ONE dispensation (a Dispensing) God's "GOSPEL of GRACE" on fallen man through JESUS CHRIST prophesied in the O.T. fulfilled in the N.T. (Ephesians 3:2-5) "If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: {3} How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, {4} Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) {5} Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; ALSO Col 1:20-29, Would love to debate you Sir but doubt you will

@KeepingWatch95

Жыл бұрын

Paul wrote Ephesians. All the Ephesians (all they in Asia) turned away from Paul (per Paul's epistle). Furthermore Paul was forbidden tp preach the word in Asia, and the Ephesians were in Ephesus, which was the Roman capital city of Asia Minor. All the candles stick Churches of Revelation were in Asia Minor and (per Acts 16:6) Paul was forbidden to preach the word there.

@Tom-uh9kk

Жыл бұрын

@@KeepingWatch95 Not sure what this has to do with the dispensation of Grace being the one and ONLY Gospel, but will respond, Paul clearly visited Ephesus "in Asia" twice and as it is yet true Act 16:6 was for forbidden to preach the Gospel in Asia yet in Act 18:1-6 while in Corinth is released to Ephesus to preach the Gospel ( Act 19:1,2,17,26, ) Paul was NOT preaching a different Gospel to the Ephesians "Asians", also the epistle to the Ephesians nowhere says that "they turned" from him, and in Rev 2 they are being "warned" to do the "first" works "or else" (Revelation 2:4-5) "Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love. {5} Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent." maybe you could explain, just don't know what this has to do with ONE dispensation of the Gospel of Grace throughout human history

@KeepingWatch95

Жыл бұрын

@@Tom-uh9kk _Both... Paul is forbidden to preach the word in Asia... and all of Asia turns away from Paul. This means towards the end of Paul's ministry, all the candle stick churches of Revelation had turned away from Paul._

@KeepingWatch95

Жыл бұрын

@@Tom-uh9kk _Paul is forbidden to preach the word in Asia..._ Acts 16:6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and *were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia,* _(In Acts 16:6 Phrygia & Galatia are areas in Asia.)_ _(In Acts 16: 7 & 8 Paul fails to comply to what was “forbidden” him. Paul continues and goes to three cities in Asia (Mysia, Bithynia, Troas)...)_ Acts 16:7 After *they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia:* but the Spirit suffered them not. Acts 16:8 And they passing by Mysia *came down to Troas.* _(In Acts 16:9 to 11 Only after a dream does Paul leave Asia to go to Greece.)_ _(In Acts 17:1 Paul returns to Asia going to Thessalonica.)_ _(In Acts 17:3 It is clear that Paul is preaching to them in Asia.)_ _(In Acts 18 Paul continues further in Asia and goes to Ephesus.)_ _If it is not shown by the scriptures that Holy Ghost changed that Paul is forbidden (of the Holy Ghost) to preach the word in Asia, and if Paul goes and proclaims to be an “apostle” within Asia... that would make Paul a false apostle._ _Apostle means "messenger, he that is sent"_ G652 ἀπόστολος apostolos ap-os'-tol-os From G649; a delegate; specifically an ambassador of the Gospel; officially a commissioner of Christ (“apostle”), (with miraculous powers): - apostle, messenger, he that is sent. _And because Paul was not only; NOT SENT to Asia Minor, Paul was “FORBIDDEN” to preach the word in Asia... and if Paul claims to be a "Apostle/messenger/sent" in Asia after Acts 16:6 then Paul is a false “apostle/messenger/sent" as accordingly to what is written in Acts 16:6._ _(In Paul 's writings to the Ephesians in Asia, Paul proclaims to be an “apostle/messenger/he that is sent”)_ Ephesians 1:1 *Paul, an apostle* of Jesus Christ by the will of God, *to the saints which are at Ephesus,* and to the faithful in Christ Jesus: _Note all the seven candlestick churches are in Asia and per Acts 16:6 Paul is forbidden to preach the word there. But Paul goes to one of the seven churches of Revelation (only one which is Ephesus) and Paul (in writing) claims to be an apostle/messenger/he that is sent. (Ephesians1:1 _*_Paul, an apostle ... to the saints which are at Ephesus...)_* _Sometime later Paul writes 2 Timothy and declares “all they which are in Asia be turn away from [him]”... “no man stood with me”..._ 2 Timothy 1:15 *This thou knowest, that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me;* of whom are Phygellus and Hermogenes. 2 Timothy 4:16 *At my first answer no man stood with me, but all men forsook me:* I pray God that it may not be laid to their charge. _After Paul's ministry (and after “all they in Asia be turned away from [Paul]”) in Revelation the first church Jesus instructs John to write is the church of Ephesus (the same church Paul had written to). However Jesus commends the church of Ephesus for “[trying] them which say they are apostles (apostle/messenger/he that is sent), and are not, and hast found them liars_ Revelation 2:1 *Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write;* These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks; Revelation 2:2 I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how *thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:*

@KeepingWatch95

Жыл бұрын

@@Tom-uh9kk _Per Acts 16:6 Paul is a false self claimed messenger._

Dispensations are simply divine, God ordered ages (time). Easily seen in man's history on earth. Can be seen in the Bible. I don't understand why reformed get so upset by it.

The word "dispensation" is in the Bible. Use it as a starting point. Then notice where it says "but God", "but now", and follow the pattern. The doctrine of the Church the Body of Christ is written in Paul's epistles, the 12 Apostles spoke of an earthly hope, Paul, the Apostle to the gentiles, spoke of a heavenly hope for the Church. Salvation by grace, not by works, not by the Law. Yup, dispensations makes lots of sense. Thank you Lord!!

If you cannot or will not answer the question that is because you are caught in a pharisaical lie and you cannot. (( Eph 1:4 According as he hath chosen US IN HIM BEFORE the FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Heb 4:3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although THE WORKS WERE FINISHED FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE world.2Ti 1:9 Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, NOT according to our works, but according to HIS OWN purpose and GRACE, WHICH WAS GIVEN us in Christ Jesus BEFORE THE world BEGAN, Tit 1:2 In hope of eternal life, which God, that CANNOT LIE, promised BEFORE THE world BEGAN; ((((HOW LONG IS THAT AGE OF GRACE/ CHURCH AGE AGAIN?)))

@janethiggins5794

5 ай бұрын

Thank you for these scriptures, will help me research😊

@thetruthimpart

5 ай бұрын

@@janethiggins5794 You're welcome but thank the Lord Jesus Christ, who come in the flesh yet He is without sin for He is the one worthy and always ask Him for His truths and a love for them. Also recommend a good read; A Biblical Refutation of Dispensationalism Arthur W. Pink

Help me what should i do with these special people in my life who recently converted into hyper dispensationalism.They believe the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Apostles other than Paul are for Jews only. I think they're e no longer read OT. They don't believe in water baptism anymore. Please for pray them. 😢

Some say dispensationalism is heresy. I disagree. “Idiocy” describes it better.

So would a Dispensationalist not preach to jewish folks? Or not send missionaries to israel? Are messianic jews inside the Israeli branch or the chruch branch?

Your method of Interpretation is WRONG. The Bible uses all forms of Language and is packed with Literature that is NOT Literal. Taking poetic language in a Literal way only leads to WRONG or ERRANT understandings. Dispensationalism is also WRONG. This results in a TWISTED View of God and Prophecy.

Dispensationalism is unbiblical in several ways. The first is that Dispensationalism created man-made time periods that simply don't exist in the Bible. Second is that Israel and the Christian church are not two separate churches. We have all been grafted onto the same family olive tree. We are all spiritual Israel and all from the seed of Abraham. Dispensationalism has only been taught in the last 120 years or so. It is a newer philosophy.

@wydopnthrtl

9 ай бұрын

220 yrs...but yes.

@elijahdiaz9794

8 ай бұрын

It is not unbiblical. There are different time periods in the Bible. None are man made,everyone of them have scriptures dedicated to proving that one time period,the Bible quote literally says so. And you just disproved your own point: Israel and the Christian church are NOT two sewerage churches,but we are the same family olive tree? That means Dispensationalism agrees with you,and yes they are two different people. And there are different time periods focusing on those people. Abraham’s sees was the tribes,and nations. Not spiritual,however I say that only to my knowledge because I haven’t seen any scripture saying that all Christina’s and Israelites are spiritually of Abraham

Totally disagree with this belief system that didn't come about until the 19th century. The kingdom of God IS at hand.

@1754Me

4 ай бұрын

AMEN!

Can't tell you how much I appreciate you guys!

So in other words it's nonsense?

Matthew 24:34 “Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.” Shouldn’t that be interpreted literally?

@rodnajean9508

Жыл бұрын

Yes, it is literal! But which “this generation” is he talking about? The generation he is speaking to, or the generation that sees the things he just described?

@2Nickcdj

Жыл бұрын

@@rodnajean9508 the generation he was talking to. The context really doesn't allow for Jesus to be talking to a future generation.

@joshjay6765

Жыл бұрын

@@rodnajean9508 there seems to be a big difference between “this generation” and “that generation”

@rodnajean9508

Жыл бұрын

@@2Nickcdj Do you think it’s possible that he is saying the generation that sees these things happen will not pass away?

@jthanrubio1126

Жыл бұрын

@@rodnajean9508 this would create a contradiction however, as Yeshua came for the lost sheep of Israel (to Jews, converts, and non-Jewish believers). Therefore, this could not support a dual-covenant notion of a future church age that He was speaking to regarding these things. This is contextually clear with the example of the existence of the temple...when Yeshua described himself as the true temple v. The building for temple worship that was present (in that generation), which was later destroyed in that generation. When Yeshua spoke about it'd destruction, He was not talking about an age in the future that it would come to pass, rather, it was for the generation in that time.

The first principal of proper hermeneutics is approach and understanding the Bible literally. We should not go to a symbolic interpretation first. Let the Bible say what it says, first.

@1754Me

4 ай бұрын

So then Jesus literally is "a lamb with seven horns and seven eyes" as Rev 5:6 says?

This theology was invented by John Nelson Darby in the 1830s. It is a man-made doctrine taught nowhere in church history prior.

@anonymousbiblebeliever

11 ай бұрын

Read 2Tim2:15 God Himself is a dispensationalist.

@christsavesreadromans1096

10 ай бұрын

@@anonymousbiblebelieverChristians in the past never held to the belief that only the epistles of Paul are to be followed, that is alien to christian history. It’s a manmade delusion, so repent of it.

@wydopnthrtl

9 ай бұрын

It wasn't invented by Darby. He just gets credit because his message and writings are documented and can be pointed at. (Pierre Poiret, John Edwards, Isaac Watts, Alexander Campbell, then Darby + all the other heretics that followed)

@messengersmessianicjewisho1058

2 ай бұрын

@@wydopnthrtl - You're calling Isaac Watts a 'heretic' ??!! He was a HERO of our Christian faith. Sorry, that alone reveals a that for you, your bias is more important than the actual facts.

@wydopnthrtl

2 ай бұрын

@@messengersmessianicjewisho1058 I could be mistaken... he was a sun-worship day keeper and laws of God denier as I understand. If I'm mistaken please show me.

That’s not true what he claims

Brother, you are faithful to dispensationalist doctrine, but not to the Bible. How did you explain their rejection of biblical authority? By dividing the bible, we create unrelated distinct periods in the bible, which is incorrectly dividing God's word. The greatest failure of the church, according to C. I. Scofield, is teaching the Old Testament. Theology that denies the authority of scripture is not from God. Dispensationalism is the offspring of antinomianism. You stated that every word was literally interpreted; how did you define the fulfillment of a promise made to Israel but to the Church? I have a lot to say, but this is not the place. My advice to you is to be faithful to the Scriptures.

@elijahdiaz9794

8 ай бұрын

Being faithful to the scriptures is being a dispensationalist. He explained it in a weird way,Dispensationalism is rightly dividing the Word of God

Does dispensationalism preach once saved always saved?

@wydopnthrtl

9 ай бұрын

No that's a select few of dispensationalists.

@elijahdiaz9794

8 ай бұрын

@@wydopnthrtlno it does actually

@elijahdiaz9794

8 ай бұрын

Yes it does preach OSAS.

@elijahdiaz9794

8 ай бұрын

@@wydopnthrtlwell,I see what you mean. Sorry for the confusion. Dispensationalism,if used correctly,says OSAS is sound

@wydopnthrtl

8 ай бұрын

@@elijahdiaz9794 I was CoC for 34yrs. Never once did I hear that said. Only time I heard it was because the preachers / teachers were condemning it.

You are talking too fast. Slow down a little. Can't grasp. Thanks, it is great Author Elizabeth Das Daily Spiritual Diet I did it His Way

So he never answered the question, is it biblical???

@anonymousbiblebeliever

8 ай бұрын

Yes it is

@1754Me

4 ай бұрын

No it's not.

@firstnamelastname-yv5rp

4 ай бұрын

@@1754Me 🤨 it is so 📖.

@1754Me

4 ай бұрын

@@firstnamelastname-yv5rp As a Dispensationalist, then is Jesus currently ruling as King? Is He on His throne? The Bible makes clear that God's Kingdom is an eternal kingdom. Dan 2:34-35 & 44-45 says that God established His Kingdom during the Roman Empire and it grows into a mountain filling the whole earth. A Dispensationalist says that this hasn't happened in the past, but will happen in the future. This makes Daniel a false prophet as his word did not come to pass (See Dt 18:20-22 for the test of a prophet). So, again, is Jesus King currently? Does He have "all authority in heaven and on earth" as He said He has? If He is King, then where is His Kingdom? I believe that He is King, and those that follow His commands have entered His Kingdom. His Kingdom started off with only a few disciples and has now covered the earth (see the Parable of the Mustard Seed). Those who do not acknowledge Jesus as King and do not obey His commands are His enemies. On the Last Day when our faith becomes sight and He returns to the new earth, those in His Kingdom will inherit eternal life while His enemies will be thrown into the Lake of Fire, their second death. The Kingdom is now. Not pushed off into the future as Dispensationalist claim.

Begging the question fallacy at 1:40.

It would be the ethical position to take to declare your position rather than give the impression that you have no bias. Paul declares one church, one baptism one royal people belonging to God. Abiding in Christ is for Jew and Gentile, make and female, slave and free. Abraham was a Gentiles when God made a covenant with him, only later did he become a Jew by circumcision.

Dispensationalism is the only way to interpret Scripture.

@mosesmanaka8109

Жыл бұрын

@@user-gd2bo9eo7y No, l am only joking, you are correct.

@hismajesty6272

Ай бұрын

So does that mean the Body and Blood of Christ is truly present in the Lord’s Supper?

So if we are to take everything in the Bible literally, then God is a bird because he longs to gather us under his wings, and the devil is a dragon in revelation. This is ludicrous. He ignores the fact that there are different genres in the Bible that communicate truth, but not all are to be taken literally.

@brokenvessel4171

2 жыл бұрын

So the Apostles were wrong in Acts 15 for not taking Moses literally that circumcision was, "an everlasting covenant." (Genesis 17:13) To bad the Apostles didn't understand dispensationalism.

@elizabethhanshew727

Жыл бұрын

A literal interpretation does consider genre. When someone says they take a literal approach to scripture it doesn’t mean they ignore metaphors or allegory. Quite the contrary. But every metaphor has a literal meaning it is trying to convey. For example the dragon you mentioned represents a real being, the devil, not just some random thing or idea that we can interpret however we want. The opposite of a literal approach is to make metaphors or allegories where there are none or saying that Revelation just represents the struggle of good vs. evil and doesn’t actually have literal events or people in mind.

@russellward89

Жыл бұрын

Are there reversible circumcisions?

@CliffCardi

Жыл бұрын

Don’t forget Revelations 2:9

@elijahdiaz9794

8 ай бұрын

Not everything is to be taken literally,but in general it’s the best way to see

So far so good, but a better answer would have also pointed out the significant problems with this approach to Bible interpretation.

@savaii4menow

7 ай бұрын

There is really no problem with this approach.

So in other words it's false? Thank you!

@robusc4940

13 күн бұрын

False ? Acts 2:44-45. Have you done that ? 44And all that believed were together, and had all things common; 45And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. ****** Matt 5:20 Does your's exceed theirs ? 20For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven. *** That would be a NO to both questions. In that case are you saved or not ?

@matthewsouthwell3500

13 күн бұрын

​@@robusc4940You quote Matthew 5:20 as if it means one had to DO more than the Pharisees, yet you should read what came before it. All those who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ have a righteousness that exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees and anyone else who relies upon their own works to be righteous before God. Matthew 5:6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, For they shall be filled. John 6:35 And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst." Romans 4:22-25 And therefore “it was accounted to him for righteousness.” Now it was not written for his sake alone that it was imputed to him, but also for us. It shall be imputed to us who believe in Him who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead, who was delivered up because of our offenses, and was raised because of our justification. - (The first "him" in this quotation is speaking of Abraham, who is righteous before God in the same manner as us, by faith). 1 Corinthians 1:30-31 But of Him you are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God-and righteousness and sanctification and redemption- that, as it is written, “He who glories, let him glory in the Lord.” Philippians 3:5-11 ...concerning the law, a Pharisee; concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless. But what things were gain to me, these I have counted loss for Christ. Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith; that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death, if, by any means, I may attain to the resurrection from the dead. (Cross reference with Isaiah 50, those who are fear the Lord, obey the voice of His Servant, who walk in darkness and have no light are given a single command in this section, "Let him trust in the name of the Lord and rely upon his God.")

It's amazing to me how a word that only appears four time, and only in Paul's epistles, and only referring to his own ministry; can be so perverted. The scriptures- referring to the Jews and Gentiles- say that now there's no difference. See Romans and Ephesians for examples.

@quintus1164

2 жыл бұрын

In Christ there is no difference. Outside of Christ there definitely is.

@heir_to_the_promise

Жыл бұрын

You forgot Galatians 3. The entire chapter. Especially the last 4 verses.

@tinicoleofficial

Жыл бұрын

That’s so true

@masina7960

Жыл бұрын

THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE NOW, BUT BEFORE THIS DISPENSATION OF GRACE THERE WAS A HUGE DIFFERENCE. GENTILE WOMAN WANTED HELP FROM JESUS BUT HE DIDNT WANT TO HELP HER AT FIRST? WHY? BECAUSE. HE CAME FOR ISRAEL AND NOT GENTILES. READ THESE VERSES WITH UNDERSTANDING. HE ACCEPTED TO HELP HER ONLY WHEN SHE ACCEPTED JEWS AS SUPERIOR TO HER BECAUSE THAT WAS THE ONLY WAY GENTILES COULD RECEIVE BLESSINGS THAT WERE INTENDED FOR JEWS AS IT WAS PROPHECIED ALL OVER OLD TESTAMENT.

@masina7960

Жыл бұрын

Matthew 15:24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. 26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. 27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table. 28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.

Did not show any verse from the Bible to justify him arguments. In Revelation 20, John saw the souls of saints who reighned 1000 years. He was talking about literal interpretation of the Bible but was unable to understand what is written in said chapter. Revelation 20 does not say that Jesus reigns for 1000 years but the saints. Liars.

So tell me, who exactly is ethnic Israel? Is this just for pure blooded Jews (if so that's a very small population). Or is this a citizenship thing? Also if this is the right way to view scripture why did NO ONE suggest it til Darby in the 1800s? Did the church fathers before him have an inferior theology? Also why did it not become popular until the Prophacy Conferences in the early 1900s. And if it is such a superior system why do all of the cults, like Mormonism, hold to it? Would we say they have good theology? And the Catholic church, they are also dispensational. Would we agree with thier theology? Why don't we see ANYONE suggest this system of reading the bible in scripture?The truth is dispensationalism is the root of cults and is unsubstantiated in scripture. On the other hand scripture describes itself via the covenants not made up 500 year chunks. Also, the 2nd temple Jews were scriptural literalists. Tell me, did they correctly understand who the Messiah would be? Or are they STILL waiting for a literal conquering King? Are we not missing Christ's return yet again?

Absolutely correct 💯

@PisceanDreams-je6vo

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely wrong. I'll definitely show you if you have time! Dispensation is paying attention to the time lines in the Bible. For example.... No human could be saved before Jesus sacrificing himself and being crucified. You see the dispensation!?? It's the time line. We are so lucky to be living after Jesus sacrificed himself.

@PisceanDreams-je6vo

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely wrong. I'll definitely show you if you have time! Dispensation is paying attention to the time lines in the Bible. For example.... No human could be saved before Jesus sacrificing himself and being crucified. You see the dispensation!?? It's the time line. We are so lucky to be living after Jesus sacrificed himself.