Want access to EXCLUSIVE content like this? Just hit the SUBSCRIBE button and check out our channel for more! Click here: bit.ly/2l43d68

@hakunamatata887

4 жыл бұрын

That’s the thing about marriage, if you focus on who got more benefits, you have to divorce, but divorce bad for both.

@hakunamatata887

4 жыл бұрын

You get more benefits unless you work for it, so focus on improving oneself, much better than focus on destroying the other. World peace!

@yizhou8259

4 жыл бұрын

Mr. Goldman is a respectable rival for Chinese because his insight and sobriety about China is rare for Americans. However, misunderstandings and misjudgements are still there. Maybe this is inevitable when dealing with a totally different civilization, and maybe this is why US missed the chance to strangle China again and again as Mr. Goldman said. He also said don't try to stop China, but compete with it. I think that's noble and wise compared to what US is doing now. If US has 10 million people who can speak Chinese, has experience with China and understand Chinese mindset, it would be so much more difficult for China to devolop.

Heritage needs an audio tech....the recording level is pretty low on this at times, and should have been boosted.

@madeinchina1450

5 жыл бұрын

Just give a call to Huawei, put 5G stuff there.

@kbtube8125

5 жыл бұрын

Huawei suck though.

@BoqPrecision

5 жыл бұрын

uploading to their youtube channel obviously an afterthought for them...

@user-tn3fo3pj2x

5 жыл бұрын

why? even if you hear clearly, you would not understand it

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

@@kbtube8125 I only buy Huawei, and I must say, it doesn't suck as well as your mom, my caucasian persuasion

I’ve worked in the industrial design & product development industry for the last 10 years, and I can say that many of the points this guy covers about innovation and industrial espionage are spot-on.

@nayanmalig

5 жыл бұрын

LOL USA has been robbing all the Chinese / German inventions for hundreds of years, unleashing two opium wars on China, bombing, killing millions upon millions, looting natural resources all over the world and now bitching about getting robbed by China

very objective and smart guy, people like him is china fear and respect the most

@madeinchina1450

5 жыл бұрын

the good news is that he is not working for Trump.

@khadrtrudeau1662

5 жыл бұрын

China not bring the stairs up to Obama's jet. This after he gave them everything they wanted.

@RonaldMcPaul

5 жыл бұрын

19th century is for Europe. 20th century is for America. 21st century is for China. 22nd Century is for Africa. 23rd Century is for Anartica. 24th century is for smoking weed.

@yuchengliu7497

3 жыл бұрын

@Merika Ramocan that's true, i am really glad to find one Trump supporter who makes sense to me.

Had US invested war funds into it's people, picture would look different today. China should not be blamed for decisions some took to expand markets.

@wbafc1231

5 жыл бұрын

@The War for the West How have they made that clear?

@Redtide

5 жыл бұрын

@The War for the West just because u read a book by some white author and u think u r an expert? to be an expert, u need to understand english and chinese and read and listen to both media to understand what both sides are thinking and saying. Please dont embarrass yourself.

@Redtide

5 жыл бұрын

USA would be a great nation if u had spent the trillions on its people, education and infrastructure instead of in war and bailing out those stupid bankers.

@Redtide

5 жыл бұрын

@The War for the West haha .. thats why your country like to send stupid asses like u to war.. u r too stupid to know why u r doing what u do. hahahahahaha

@calenedgar3722

5 жыл бұрын

@@Redtide So when exactly was YOUR country last considered a superpower ? It is fine for folks to be critical of the US, Lord knows we are NOT infallible. . . But, if you are not willing to offer practicable alternatives, then your viewpoint merely serves as wishful thinking.

The core feature of China's political system has nothing to do with communism, the core feature is a centralized distribution of political power. China transformed from a feudal country to an empire in 221 BC, which is more than 2000 years ago, and stayed as an empire since then. I'm not going to judge whether such a political structure is good or bad, however, I would argue that the Chinese empire in any period, especially when it's under the rule of Han Chinese, could be counted as an expansionist country, compared to other great empires throughout human history. It's a rather introverted culture. It is not fair to picture China as an evil expansionist country threatening the world just because it is not a democratic country.

@WillxM88

5 жыл бұрын

At what point do we live in the present? All pasts can be scrutinized for flaws but how it performs today matters more. I think your analysis is polite, but to say it's nonthreatening when it punishes countries economically for speaking out on human rights abuses is improper for the developed world. When the US had guantanamo bay human rights issues, the world spoke out and this is right. Imagine if the U.S. started punishing countries for badmouthing it as China has and continues to do. With increase in technology, I expect China to reduce freedoms within china and around the world rather than increase any. The scariest thing is that the CCP doesn't care about anyones opinions, not even their own citizens and doesn't want them to even voice any opposing opinions. As for expansionist, CCP expansion is based on military bases and economic expansion. Meaning, analysis of local competition and putting state resources behind companies to beat those companies out. The U.S. leaves it to private businessmen to use their know how and find resources on their own in fair competition. No western governments have done things to such a predatory degree as China. There was a flood of steel that collapsed steel companies globally due to Chinese state over production. These are not just simple mistakes but rather carefully planned outcomes. Centralized power is bad. Centralized power with no elections is worse. Centralized power with no elections that attempts to suppresses voices domestic and abroad is the worst. Imagine if Donald trump had centralized power? Lol.

@QuicKnDead911

5 жыл бұрын

Yet they couldnt even conquer Korea or Japan nor India or Vietnam. The only country in recent history China defeated was an unarmed Tibet and they still had trouble. And Chinese conquerors of any note weren't even Chinese they were Mongolians and I dare you to tell a Mongolian he's Chinese you might get a face full of shimni.

@QuicKnDead911

5 жыл бұрын

No its an evil country because Mao's "Great Leap Forward"murdered 45m people.

@QuicKnDead911

5 жыл бұрын

@Dan Man Every nation on earth is from one group conquering another its how civilization works now if you want to debate is civilization and democide viable in the 21st century thats a debate worth having. My point about the Chinese empire is that the Chinese never had an empire the Khanates were a Mongol Empire that included China but since the fall of the Khans China hasnt even been a regional power.

@QuicKnDead911

5 жыл бұрын

@Dan Man Do you know what the word armistice means? Iraq invaded Kuwait the US did not go to war with Iraq but 156 other nations did as well the UN negotiated a cease fire just like they did in 1954 with North Korea but the UN is still technically at War with North Korea it wasn't an American War it was a UN Peace Keeping mission just like Vietnam and Iraq. As permanent member of the UN Security Council with absolute veto power the United States as a sovereign nation to uphold UNR 687 (read it here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_687) Iraq failed to comply regardless of whether there were WMD's Iraq failed to comply with the no fly zones , targeting civilians (The Kurds) and inspections thus violatly the terms of the cease fire agreement.

You got a bunch of people from the West trying to decipher what's happening in China/Asia? Many of you don't even understand the thought process behind how other countries work. Applying the west mindset to all countries is just being plain dumb.

@marble296

5 жыл бұрын

USA need to pull their socks up if they're to compete in the modern world. These types of people are just plain dumb. The world will turn their back on USA if it continues.

@HelicopterHatHacker

5 жыл бұрын

What people?

@resett8641

4 жыл бұрын

how about a human mindset. instead of right left east west

Some points he suggested sound like they could be interpreted as excessively antagonistic. We do need to address our trade imbalance with China though. Like he said, to do that we need to invest in research again instead of only looking for growth through cutting production costs. We need to raise our wages to grow our domestic market again. Apparently we need to subsidize raw materials and other basic industrial sectors in order to rebuild a functional supply chain so that manufacturing is possible in this country again. We should be subsidizing engineering education much more. And we should develop more of the research that our defense contractors constantly squirrel away for some utopian future that they don't seem to want to help create.

one of the best SWOT analysis of China and US

@dmarion8004

5 жыл бұрын

It's like they are saying, electronics took an entire slice of economy and no one sees where funds are missing from.

A most fair and comprehensive assessment of China situation in the media so far, left or right. Almost sounds like an undeserving praise of the Chinese accomplishments, both domestic and international. The Chinese lives have been improved. The lives of the other third world countries are to be improved. Something the western colonists have failed to do and Americans have left enough carnages every where in the world. But it’s bad because it’s being done by China. I am encouraged that you are for Free and fair competitions. Fight it out in the market. Don’t blame China for the failings of the US. A few view points, Ruthless meritocracy and Chinese arrogance (a term normally reserved for the Americans), are a bit humorous. Minor disputes of South China Sea? If the US removed all military bases surrounding China, all disputes in South China Sea would go disappear. The bottom line is that China is NOT WASP. For that matter Asia is NOT WASP. Hope Japan, Korea, India you are taking a note. Western imperialism is ok but anybody else is not and not allowed.

@stevewang2

Жыл бұрын

Exactly to the point. Even in the 21 century, the western imperialist mindset has not gone away.

There is one very important weapon which the US cannot match with China in the competition, the size of a local market.

@zachguo3374

5 жыл бұрын

@Donald Kasper Your data is way outdated. $4 can only buy you a cup of boba there.

@zachguo3374

5 жыл бұрын

@Maulana Iskandar I'm not talking about first tier cities but 2nd and 3rd tier ones. People that poor was only 1% of the population and should be eliminated next year as planned. China's retail spending has already surpassed that of USA .

@meganh9460

5 жыл бұрын

China is also heavily dependent on foreign trade, as they do not have the consumption market at home for all their goods. Their one child policy has made that even worse and the full pain of that decision should be felt in the next 10-15 years. The Americans foreign trade only makes up a small fraction of their GDP around 3-5 percent and are one of the least dependent countries in the world on foreign trade. With decent birth rates and immigration, they will have a steady consumption population for another 20 years. This is why they are moving away from globalism, its not financially in their interest.

@zachguo3374

5 жыл бұрын

@@meganh9460 Your data is off too. data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS?locations=CN-US-EU US's export is low partly because your beloved capitalists tend to set up offshore companies rather than employ US people.

@QuicKnDead911

5 жыл бұрын

@xox and I'll bet a dollar to a yuan (less than a dime) that we'll see another mass starvation pandemic in China by the end of my life, my mother use to say at dinner time as I'm sure a lot of over 60 year olds in US "eat everything on you plate theres starving children in China". China might be focusing on the technical but it still cannot feed its populace without imports and America still produces 40% of the worlds wheat,corn and now soy and produces over 50% of its beef,poultry and pork plus we are the largest exporter of fossil fuel and have the best and most modern military the 3 things needed in a protracted war with China.

America victim of its own free trade policy? 😛.

@deepasinghal4729

4 жыл бұрын

If it was ever "free" in the first place, given restrictions via WTO, etc.

We have started the downtrend when the Kardashian families became the idols of today’s youth instead of the innovators and scientists. China however...

@elinope4745

5 жыл бұрын

The idolization of the Kardashian family over actual innovators is part of a previous trend that started with destabilizing the family. This could not have happened without the passing of no fault divorce laws. This also could not have happened WITHOUT giant monopoly conglomerates eliminating competition, and thus the rewards of innovation. Edit: a typo, I put the corrected word in all caps.

@miyojewoltsnasonth2159

5 жыл бұрын

@@elinope4745 While there is an aspect of truth to your comment, "This could not have happened without the passing of no fault divorce laws," your attempt to explain a complicated issue -- with multiple causes -- to just one cause renders it useless. It's a typical delusion of populist thinking and does little to nothing to remedy a problem. Try again.

@sophiax8290

5 жыл бұрын

@stop immigration Hello Kitty is from Japan, you rasist

@2drealms196

5 жыл бұрын

Innovators and scientists have never ever been the top idols of the vast majority of youth in any age. The media institutions and sports organizations who highlight sports stars, actors, musicians, war heroes and sometimes politicians have been. Think even back to the 1960s-70s, even back then who would top the idol list of the majority of youth? Answer: Sports stars, actors, musicians. Even politicians would be ahead of innovators and scientists.

@2drealms196

5 жыл бұрын

Don't you guys remember what its like to be 13-14 years old? Come on, don't put yourselves on pedestals.

IF people had only watched China Uncensored, they'd know a lot more about China and its actions....

@user-yt7dq2kl2t

5 жыл бұрын

nah that show is all about bullshitting. It's sponsored by anti china cult.

@crikeycant2633

5 жыл бұрын

As a Taiwanese, I don't know anyone who watches that crap.

@stalemateib3600

5 жыл бұрын

@LOCAL COPE, well, I would expect the Israeli government to be more concerned about Israel than China, though certainly in recent years, China has tried getting into a better relationship with Israel.

this man is a man of knowledge

Fair and honest elaboration on the subject. But didn't specifically said China has no intention of promoting its political system. And more importantly, misinterpreted the ultimate goal of the Chinese efforts. The Chinese put forward mutual sharing and benefiting, a thought that brings suspect to most western elites, because it is alien to them. Da-Tong is a mutual sharing and benefiting concept in the ancient Chinese teachings. Perhaps the present day Chinese leaders have seen and realised the incapability of the west in particular in trying to dominate the world, they fall back to their ancient wisdom. Do the west have something like Da-Tong?

@lifuranph.d.9440

5 жыл бұрын

@J Doe Yes, what you say is correct. Why? CCP removed Confucianism from China...ergo God and/or Moral Oversight and replaced it with CCP's brand of Morality.

@S4m940

4 жыл бұрын

@fireson23 Are Confucius teachings considered a not-religion? Because the members of the communist party (unlike normal people) have the special prohibition to believe in any religion, as far as I know.

@S4m940

4 жыл бұрын

​@fireson23 Well, I understand your point. I suppose you got some bad apples especially with the British imperialism and the disgraceful opium wars. Sorry for that, you didn't deserve such unfair humiliation (even if I'm Italian and we had nothing to do with this). Glad to hear your corrections. I can't find anything wrong in some measures of control on what's going on in the temples and mosques. If you let any citizen to decide his own religion, on condition he is truly obeying the laws of the State, then it's ok. "Give to Caesar (the State) what belongs to Caesar, and give to God what belongs to God" we say here, since ancient Rome. I imagine and hope that with your system of control, it will be much more difficult for terrorists to inflitrate and create disorders. We in EU probably should learn something from you guys, maybe in the future let us know how it works out ;-)

Thanks for sharing this wonderful material. Food for thought.

If you want to win against me, I should be doing my damndest to out do you. I shouldn't be trying to trip you.

@WillxM88

5 жыл бұрын

China's government is the best at tripping companies, even domestic to support their champions.

@goldsilvervscrisiscollapse4320

5 жыл бұрын

@@WillxM88 the racists coming out of the woodwork, really shows the kind of videos you guys have on

@WillxM88

5 жыл бұрын

@@goldsilvervscrisiscollapse4320 I never mentioned anything about race. Are you a bot?

@lifuranph.d.9440

5 жыл бұрын

@@WillxM88 A 50 cent bot.

@Tooncow2

5 жыл бұрын

@@goldsilvervscrisiscollapse4320 how in the world is bring up issues with China racist? Have you any idea what they've been doing for the past few decades?

I hope the screen can react much faster than Kindle

You can't blame someone who manages to be No. 1 with peaceful way if you can't find the right way to keep you in that position.

Why is this presentation broadcast in such low volume?

@luckycharm8888

5 жыл бұрын

Thats what american technology is, it lagged behind that cannot even provide descent sound system for intellectual discussion but provide HD tech for kardashian shows 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

@luckycharm8888

5 жыл бұрын

@ROBIN WILTON 😜😜😜😜😜

The First opium war is in 1840, not 1848.

@fallenangel2123

5 жыл бұрын

Third one have just begun

@fallenangel2123

5 жыл бұрын

The "opium" this time is the "economic growth" It's OVER

@justincase5825

5 жыл бұрын

@@fallenangel2123 There are some people who believe that China is flooding the US with synthetic opioids as a form of hybrid warfare.

@undefinedwewew9434

5 жыл бұрын

China is no longer the China of Opium War. China has the ability to destroy the earth.

@NangongReng1973

5 жыл бұрын

undefined wewew You are silly.

Can these experts talk about US Grand Strategy to deal with China's? That is more interesting.

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

Why is everyone trying to better the US? Fucking obscene. People are just willingly subjecting themselves to that high school mentality. Ooooh, me wanna be with the posh crowd. Bitch I lead the posh crowd. Time the Chinese started leading. Forget our parents' "wisdom"; it's built on thin air and produces no results.

@soyusmaximus7176

5 жыл бұрын

Keep the peace, invite immigrants in, get people to have more children, and keep NATO together. That's how you beat China in the long-game.

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

@@soyusmaximus7176 Lol, thanks for spilling the beans, I mean, "wisdom", lol, and to that end, we'll just neuter the US from inside out ,and then the world will finally be left in peace

@bovo8646

5 жыл бұрын

@@readingRoom100 You know why nobody want china because they become arrogant and more selfish if they got power in hand. Just take a look of the Chinese dept trap behavior in Africa just because they got some extra few billion dollar. Can you tell me what they can do if they rule the world.

@user-cw5tw9iy5c

5 жыл бұрын

BO VO I absolutely agree with you, even though I am Chinese. Not many people recognizes China’s nature. I am in America and I love America!

China's GRAND Strategy in stages: 1) Reduce Economic Dependence on US Markets, Grow Economy to Parity with America quantitatively and qualitatively by 2025. 2) Secure N.W border and South East Asia Through Road-Belt initiative, to achieve the following effects: Develop new markets, develop routes to resources and foster alliances in the South and West, moving focus from coastal regions on the East to inland regions in the West, by 2030. 3) Build up Navy and Airforce, increase presence in South China Seas up to Philippines Coast. So that Taiwan is surrounded by 2035. 4) Begin the process of recovering Taiwan, through direct blockade and strangulation, and be poised for war against the rival bloc of Japan, South Korea and America if they try to break the blockade. Basically, they aim to have a secure NORTHern border with Russia, a Secure Western Border with the Road-Belt initiative and get a Secure Southern flank also. They aim to deploy At least Four carrier groups, 2 to deal with the local Taiwan seas and 2 to cover South China Sea and further afield. The Chinese government cannot politically justify any overseas adventures to its people if it cannot recover Taiwan. It has built the idea of re-taking Taiwan into the center of its foreign policy, into the national psyche, and into its propaganda for 70 years. It knows that if it cannot re-take Taiwan by 2048 a century would've passed and it would be unlikely it could ever take Taiwan.

@bearbuster157

5 жыл бұрын

Toraguchi Toraguchi Unfortunately this won't happen. A despot will rise to power and Chinese don't have the balls to fight this off. All the educationed will be slaughtered and China will slide back into poverty. That's 5000 years of history repeating itself.

@ex0duzz

5 жыл бұрын

Bear Buster you mean in a few centuries after being undisputed number 1 civilisation for hundreds of years? Just like most Chinese dynasties? Lol. USA and the west would have fallen long before that and we would probably have off world colonies like on the moon and mars etc if that's your point? Chinese don't have the Balls to fight it off? Look through Chinese 5,000 year history and tell me when china has ever not fought and did revolutions?

@toraguchitoraguchi9154

5 жыл бұрын

@@bearbuster157 That's their plan, BUT South East Asia is still wary of China, and India is not friendly on the Western border, meanwhile N.Korea may finally open up and China loses another card to play. Let's hope their plan never succeed.

@netgold5643

5 жыл бұрын

China really peaceful country that they don’t think about anything aggressive to other countries but still want to help the poor countries to develop. They just want to guarantee safety and take back Taiwan.

@toraguchitoraguchi9154

5 жыл бұрын

@@netgold5643 China - fought Korean war....Between 1948 and 1982 Border war with India, border war with USSR, Invaded and annexed Tibet (then an independent Kingdom) invaded Vietnam, 2014 it began to build island bases in Phillipines' territorial waters, by 2018 it claims a whole sea that does not belong to it. What China did was pretend to be peaceful when it was not able to make war. As for helping poor countries, NOBODY believes that because wherever China went it caused poor countries to go bust and owe China billions, it ruined their natural resources, and like locusts it ate up every ounce of value.

mainstream media take note intelligent questions being asked !!!

Very informative speech by last speaker and frank

The speaker does not explain China's Grand Strategy, the title of this talk. This supreme goal or set of goals that comprise 'grand strategy' is decided by China's top leadership. He admits he does not know what they have decided. So what he explains in this talk only outlines some of what Beijing's commercial and industrial policies are. He does not plainly describe China's goal-based, centrally planned economy and how that limits innovation and initiative. A lot of what he is saying is colored by what he observed and experienced in China over some short years, recenty. His views are also influenced by mirror imaging what we in the West consider the most efficient or 'best' way of doing things, not the way the Chinese consider things. Lastly, he does not explain the lack of a profit motive for the huge state-controlled industrial section and how it limits innovation. He does not touch on the lack of a legal system to enforce contracts and protect private and intellectual property or the controlled banking and currency situations. He does not seem to appreciate China's belt and road initiative is a mercantilist model that subordinate countries will soon come to hate, but he does correctly term one clear outcome is to make the global South China's tenant farmers--this is a very good point. All in all though, this talk is disappointing. It is more along the lines of a surface overview of the current state of play in the economic and political realms of China/U.S. relations.

@harunomar3750

5 жыл бұрын

I am more disappointed by the fact that America is losing the race on broadband and 5G technology. Traditionally, since the invention of the transistor all the technology innovations are spearheaded by the DoD (Defense) projects and now we cannot remain ahead with our research and inventions. Instead, America is too involved in the global wars (with enormous cost) and all 3 branches of the government are heavily divided according to the party affiliations. The politicians are more focused on regaining the seats for the next election and less on making America the leader of the world.

@sutapasbhattacharya9471

5 жыл бұрын

For a better idea about China's actual Grand Strategy, I suggest reading Steven Mosher's 'Bully of Asia'. For about 2,700 years, China has had brutal, repressive, totalitarian, police states [based on the Legalist Ideology] - long before Western Communism came along. China cannot build decent jet engines for its knock-offs of Russian fighter planes and its only active aircraft carrier is a refurbished old Soviet era Ukrainian vessel. Note that, as with the hype about China's supposed advances in technology, there is also much mythology about China's supposed achievements in the past. China constantly lies about having a 5,000 year history/civilization when in fact it only has 3,600 years. The speaker regurgitates this myth - as does Mosher in his Preface although his own text contradicts it!!! Also, many Westerners believe the false propaganda that Chinese culture supposedly dominated Asia in the past. In reality, as Hu Shih [famous scholar who was KMT ambassador to the USA] wrote famously, India conquered China culturally for 2,000 years primarily throught the voluntary Chinese adoption of Indian Buddhist culture. So much what you think of as Chinese is actually of Indian origin. Block Printing of books entered China with Buddhist missionaries from India. Kung Fu came from Indian martial arts taught by an Indian monk to the Shaolin monks. Feng Shue was based on the Indian geomancy Vastu. The first Chinese opera Po Tow was based on an Indian play. The Chinese [and the Japanese] only managed to progress in the development of logical thought thanks to the incorporation of 35,000 Indian words into Chinese [including the word Mandarin from Sanskrit Mantrin] and the influence of Indian Philosophy. Their own pictogram-based language did not facilitate abstract conceptual thought - hence pithy proverbs posed as Philosophy in China. The famous Chinese inventor and scholar Lin Yutang, wrote that India was China's (and the world's) teacher in many areas of Maths, Philosophy, Grammar, Arts etc. This is not surprising as most of what the West called Modern maths 500 years ago was in fact Indian maths such as Arithmetic [the Indian Number System with Zero which Cambridge Professor John Barrow says is Humanity's greatest intellectual invention], Algebra [Colebrooke showed in 1817 that modern algebra is based on ancient Indian algebra which al-Khwarizmi copied -a long with Indian Arithmetic], Trigonometry and even Calculus [which originated in India centuries before Newton] - theconversation.com/five-ways-ancient-india-changed-the-world-with-maths-84332 Similarly, most of so-called Indo-China was civilized by Indian influence, hence the Hindu-Buddhist root cultures in Burma, Thailand, Angkor-Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia. Brunei is from Sanskrit Varuna. 80% of Japanese gods have Indian origins. The Philippines first written script was based on Sanskrit. Even in Korea, they still remember that the first king of Korea married an Indian princess and the South Korean leader was recently visiting Ayodhya where this Queen came from. Thus, in the past India [resembling Athens compared to China's Sparta] had far greater cultural influence than China - including dominating China - and Tibetan Buddhist culture came from India. Don't be surprised when the future trends in global society emanate again from creative India rather than China.

@trufactearth3066

5 жыл бұрын

@@sutapasbhattacharya9471 Ok OK .. if China is no body, copied cat, no invention. so fragile , then why u pay attention? Just have good food and good drink.Happy haapy

@gardnert1

4 жыл бұрын

I also noticed what you brought up. More than that, I noticed that he has a profound ignorance of China's military and general military strategies, tactics, and capabilities. He also seems to be ignorant of American military capabilities. He said China's 30,000 marines and 50,000 amphibious mechanized infantry would be enough to successfully invade Taiwan. That claim is so outrageously false I don't know where to begin. He has an armchair general's level of military knowledge, to be sure. It's actually pretty embarrassing. Thought I was going to get a good lecture on what China is trying to accomplish, how, and why. Instead got an utter disappointment.

@gardnert1

4 жыл бұрын

@@sutapasbhattacharya9471 Something to also consider is the influence of the Greeks on India and Buddhism. Clearly Greeks from Bactria had a profound impact on the progression of northern Indian culture and religion, especially in the Punjab, which could account for that region's continued dominance of the rest of the subcontinent and its ability to export its culture and religion to China. That period of history is extremely interesting and it's one most Westerners are totally oblivious to. I'd imagine most Chinese are as well. Just thought I'd bring it up and see what you thought or knew about it.

What a beautiful lecture.... right to the core of the issue.... wall street and the multinationals gave all the taxpayers invested technology and our manufacturing to our rivals...

@ericjohnson7234

4 жыл бұрын

That is the problem of globalism. At the very least we could've given that tech to our allies, at least our core allies, and any that joined the core later on. Or Just keep it to ourselves, but we did not. That is a fucking tragedy at best and treason at worst.

The problem is that too many Yankees are too busy watching the Kardashians and the Super Bowl while China is graduating physics/computer geniuses.

@TheGhostOf2020

5 жыл бұрын

I’m an American born millennial electrical engineer and I went to a university with a massive Chinese international student body. I was roommates with one, I am good friends with another, and I’ve interacted with hundreds of Chinese students in my field who are my age. The Americans and Chinese student bodies are mirror images of each other in all but our historical differences. If you think all Chinese people are the top of the class students at our universities, you’re forgetting the 99.999% of Chinese nationals that live everyday lives in the PRC. I’m going to assume you don’t have any formal education beyond “secondary school” (assuming you’re British given the “yankee” comment) and you have no intelligent basis for even a fart in the direction of critical thought on anything related to the US, China, sociology, or political science.

@anthonysilva5312

5 жыл бұрын

2020 your “assumptions” are wrong on all counts. In fact I have not one but 2 university degrees. One is from the University of Waterloo-the most prestigious tech school in Canada with a majority Chinese student body. My second degree is in education at a school with, again, vast majority of Chinese students; many of them visa students who are here to attain their post secondary degree from a North American university , preferably Waterloo, and then bring that back home with them. There you go. Listen to the speaker’s stats: FOUR TIMES THE STEM SUDENTS 33% ALONE IN ENGINEERING. In the meanwhile, keep your arrogant comments, assumptions and farts to yourself. (And stop watch the Kardashians)

@alfredwan8574

5 жыл бұрын

@@TheGhostOf2020 what the life of 99.999% of Chinese in China? care to elaborate?

@TheGhostOf2020

5 жыл бұрын

It’s pretty ignorant to think Americans are all watching the kardashians. I absolutely detest reality tv, and I can only name a handful of people in my life who watched that crap. Chinese people are just like Americans, Canadians, Europeans, Koreans and Japanese people in the sense that they just want to live their life in peace and prosperity. Sure Americans have dropped off in promoting STEM fields, but to attribute that to some form of cultural moral failing is laughable; you sound like someone in the 50’s talking about the moral failings of rock music and race mixing. Reality television is not destroying American interest in STEM fields... lol Did you ever talk to Chinese students? Or just gawk at them... because all of the Chinese students I have ever met just wanted to learn a trade just like everyone else and live their life, not some kind of rigid loyalty to the nation of China and meet some kind of quota. They wanted to earn $$$ just like everyone else on earth, and becoming an engineer is a great way to earn $$$. You’re comparing the best and brightest of a nation to a piss poor stereotype of “an American” who doesn’t join the millions of his or her peers in higher education. Of course someone traveling internationally is more focused academically than someone who just chose their local state university, who travels internationally to not do their best? All peoples of all nations just want to make life better for themselves and their loved ones at the end of the day. It’s what unites us all.

@anthonysilva5312

5 жыл бұрын

2020 read my comment. I never said “all”, I said “too many”.

In all weight classes, Chinese missiles outrange their American counterparts, often by 200%-300%. For example: propelled by novel dual pulse rocket motors and flying on a semi-ballistic trajectory, the nifty PLA-15 missile homes on AWACS and airborne tankers loitering behind battle lines. In 2015 USAF General Herbert Carlisle told Congress, “Look at the PLA-15, at the range of that weapon. How do we counter that?” The general added that the USAF can field two hundred F-22 Raptors carrying six missiles while China’s more numerous fighters carry twelve longer ranged weapons. In 2019, The Air Force canceled its E-8C AWACS recapitalization, explaining that any new non-stealthy airplanes would be easy prey for the PLA-15. Its smaller sibling, the PLA-10, is no less deadly. Douglas Barrie, ISIS airpower specialist, says the missiles have tipped the balance of power, “For the notional Western combat aircraft pilot, there is no obvious respite to be found in attempting to avoid within visual range threat of the PLA-10 [1] by keeping beyond visual range. In this environment also the PLAAF will be able to mount an increasingly credible challenge and at engagement ranges against some targets that would previously have been considered safe. As one former US Air Force tanker pilot drily noted to this author, “‘That’s aimed right at me.’” [1] The PLA-10, an air-to-air missile, has a more advanced guidance system and twice the range, speed and payload of the USAF AIM-9.

No point crying in front of each other and instead do something about it

The concept of fair game in China (中國--center of the world), is different than that of the western countries. Chinese hopes and works towards world in prosperity and harmony. America needs to realize that China had been the dominant society of the world before over thousands of years, and will recover to it soon.

This talk should be entitled "What is America's Grand Strategy!" because the speaker is an American. Please don't second guess "what is Chinese grand strategy"! It is clear from this talk that America has failed to compete with China, in spite of her R&D strength and credential of the past. Trump has just exacerbated the problem of USA. The government of USA needs to invest in education and research of their own youth, not just making money from overseas students and accuse of these overseas students stealing the IP of USA. Frankly, stupid media uproars of late. Mr Goldman has a very good understanding of USA, China and their challenges. Thank you for sharing the video.

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

No, there's no "good understanding", there's just him framing China in a narrative that's more conducive to US achieving domination, all without any Chinese rebuttal. No, think tanks aren't think tanks, they're just propaganda tanks, so pls be more astute

Well, this was by far the least biased addressing I have seen on the recent heated debates on Sino-US confrontation

Very informative and appreciated. The audio is too low.

Underestimating the Chinese is a dangerous mistake that I keep seeing Americans make, and I constantly wonder why they do that. There is surely no shortage of highly intelligent, hard working AND creative Chinese immigrants on campus. Having seen how formidable the Chinese can be as competitors, when they're on this side of the Pacific, why would Americans imagine that they'd be any less capable at home?

I feel new neurons are forming in my brain ...

The most facts in this presentation are wrong. US and China have a lot of common interests and helped each other in the past. Without the helps from China in 2008, US economics would be much worse than it is now.

Give the person asking the question the microphone, it would be nice to hear the question not just the speakers answer.

@russianbotfarm3036

5 жыл бұрын

Right - a good practice is for the speaker to repeat the question.

28:19 - The talk about us educating the Chinese at our best universities. Know that the saddest part is? Those same ivy league universities that are educating the Chinese also blocked out potential American students by making their tuition prohibitively unaffordable.

@kitcarr4668

5 жыл бұрын

Worth a look at Elizabeth Iserbyte Thompson's book 'The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America" ... there may still be a Free PDF available from her website !

@thetedmang

5 жыл бұрын

@@kitcarr4668 Will do

@fargonebewdy

5 жыл бұрын

@@kitcarr4668 Thanks for that - got it here.....(btm of page) >> deliberatedumbingdown.com/ddd/deliberate-dumbing-down/

@lamari2531

5 жыл бұрын

The government should restrict our universities from educating Chinese foreigners

@thetedmang

5 жыл бұрын

@@lamari2531 That's a dangerous first step

Man, the horse is out of the barn, and long gone. Dream on, while you could.

@raoulduke8340

5 жыл бұрын

The horse's severed head is in the sleeping American's bed..a la Godfather

@joakgum1294

5 жыл бұрын

@Donald Kasper China is inferior in every sense. Why she has become the number one enemy of the USA ? As Trump said, the trade war is easy to win. 18 months on and it is still an uphill battle. Who will win ? I am not sure. As Trump said, lets see.

@Moshe_Dayan44

5 жыл бұрын

The problem is that the rest of the world DOESN'T want China to be the world's pre-eminent power, and will readily ally with the United States to keep them from becoming it. Most of the world already speaks English, at least as a second language, and they're not prepared to learn an utterly different language, with a totally alien alphabet. You're right, the horse is out of the barn, but not in China's favour. The 350 year span of the British Empire, which was essentially inherited by the United States after World War II, has already cemented the ideal of individual freedom, sanctity of the individual, rule of law and the English language. These ideals have already been exported to every nook and cranny around the globe. China is more like the German Empire: doomed to fail because they were too late to the table, and they provoked too many nations to turn against them in unison.

@joakgum1294

5 жыл бұрын

@@Moshe_Dayan44 Sorry to embarrass you. I understand that the most spoken language of the world is Chinese. English not bad, number 3. Keep it up.

@joakgum1294

5 жыл бұрын

@@Moshe_Dayan44 You may love the current form of democracy. But international politics is dictated by jungle rules. If one country one vote, the USA would become the poorest country.

A half empty room of boated white men listening to a half-empty, self-important lecture. My take is this "Those sneaky Chinese want to spend money in the developing world to help billions of people at subsistence level to become consumers and trading partners. Then they will use their new friends to grow in power and prestige." A room of conservative businessmen should not complain about a competitor that is producing a huge number of engineers and scientists. They should have become engineers so they could have done something useful.

@DD-wx4jc

3 жыл бұрын

Communism is going to win in the end, after the world adopts socialism.

Excellent, excellent speech even from Chinese view. The best part is that, he talked about no bullshit of communism or dictator stuff, he knows all these conflicts, they are only matters of national interests and national security. I feel relieved to finally meet one wise western man who knows what really matters, instead of bragging human rights and free Tibet craps. When is the time that people can finally understand that, it's not about ideology? I'd rather facing true scumbags like him than hypocrisy feeling superior than you when they are all doing the same disgusting things.

@tomxavier2920

5 жыл бұрын

What really matters to China is MONEY...human misery and persecution is CRAPS...I think that makes you CRAPS....

@ctcy7580

5 жыл бұрын

@@tomxavier2920 Of course it is about money, you can't understand its importance being rich or poor all your life, only those experience both understand. Westerner hypocrisy values have fooled its own people, go ask Trump if he believe in all those craps? I highly doubt. Then who elected such a crazy president? It's the silent majority who won't speak on social media. I am a postgrad student in UK and soon going Chinese for PhD at quantum computing so why not stfu and try make your country a better place?

@vilx1308

5 жыл бұрын

Tom Xavier can u imagine the funny image when u telling Chinese that they are oppressed by its government while they live in a better house, wearing better clothing children go to better school and get better paid than u do?

Excellent speaker. I am impressed, really capture well the situation. Listen from 27:30, it gives the reason why competition technology is already lost for US if US not challenging itself on education .

Much of David Goldman's analysis is relatively right. But his vision that China is a bigger threat to the American people than climate change discredits anything he has to say. It is certainly possible to imagine research developments that could have a major impact on the manufacturing of advanced technology products. But, regardless of its percentage of GDP, the United States is still investing a very large amount of money in research. RCA may have been a leader in research. But, that research did not preserve its business. IBM cut back its research expenditures because research was not making much of a contribution to its product development. Bell labs large success at research did not sustain a business able to compete with Huawei. Samsung and TSMC did not establish their leading positions in semiconductor manufacturing by some kind of qualitative breakthrough in research. At least over the last several decades the advance of technology has largely been driven by product development. All those engineers China is generating are probably the real source of its advantage. Most of the people in the world do not live in the United States. Technology development comes from the work of human engineers. As the nations of the world are able to educate their people, no one nation is going to be able to dominate technology. Much of America's problem comes from the exceptional position in the world that it achieved through the outcome of World War II and the Western European success with the industrial revolution. The Americans who think there is some magic strategy that will enable the United States to sustain that kind of dominance forever are living in a fantasy world. The United States should understand the need to maintain a strong manufacturing base for the products of the future. But, it is even more important for the United States to understand that it has to learn how to live with the rest of the people in the world without having to dominate them all. The relations between nations will always have some kind of adversarial competition and protection of national interests. But, it needs to be the constructive competition of a business world without monopolies and not the destructive agenda of those who can't imagine life without dominance over the rest of the world.

@brocklanders6969

5 жыл бұрын

Climate change is ZERO threat to the American people. The Chinese would love nothing more than for us to sink tons of money into this overblown issue.

As a country china has an IQ of 104m the USA 99m and India 82. Tatu Vanhanen wrote an academic book titles The Limits of Democratization: Climate, Intelligens and resource redistribution. A great book overlooked by most. One of the major storylines is that countries with an IQ below 90 can not sustain a democracy. As a suggestion, do a Googles search of country by IQ

@eJohndoe

5 жыл бұрын

China's average IQ was 80 in the 1970's when it's poverty rate was 60%.

@untitled6391

6 ай бұрын

So India is not a democracy?

Fascinating. Seems to be the most informed Western lecturer on China.

@steveweiss7191

5 жыл бұрын

So far I have not seen any discussion about the likelihood of a demographic time bomb that could negatively impact China's economic ascendancy. The one child policy has caused an imbalance between generations and put limits on family creation. The Chinese preference for male children also has caused unintended consequences for the makeup of the population. Lastly, the use of the US dollar as the world reserve currency seems to be one its way out not to be replaced by the Chinese currency but by either gold or cryptocurrency. People's confidence in government and banks is in decline, and another financial crash seems on the horizon.

比起有些人，作者看的更清楚，思路眼界更清晰开阔… 但是，如果美国就按他的逻辑行动，那就是有点类似金政委说的“棋战”，大家都清楚对方的水平目的，然后基本上打明牌博弈，最后拼的就是谁发展快、发展好，科技进步快，科技转化好，谁得模式更吸引人… 问题就来了，他说是“中国人或许也小看了美国人” 那么就认真理一下。 拼发展，我们还有10亿人待中产化，人均1w，空间还很高，14亿人的规模潜力远高于你美国去工业化的4亿人。你比发展，你潜力和空间差距都很大。 美国优势在于军事、全球政治影响力和价值观、存量上的科技实力和科研水平。但是拼发展和攀科技，你美军没用！反而是累赘！我们发展不对称战力，又是防御性推进，你美国飞机海军就只能干瞪眼空转。吓唬小国可以，对于中国美军就非常鸡肋。再不要说历史原因美国在中东、阿富汗等地区有一大堆更鸡肋危险的历史欠账，更是又烧钱又麻烦又不落好… 全球影响力和价值观让你支持的川普直接掀桌子毁了，再建立？近十几年你就是重新做好人也挽回不了！何况你们本来就是种族主义和霸权主义核心…相比中国的平等发展、和平友好的命运共同体，你美国政治和道义价值观上输了太多…你们自己西方人的民粹就把价值观拆的粉碎，各种思潮反噬，你们难受的还在后面呢…… 存量科技实力已经剩不下多少了，老本早吃空了。烧科技，有钱么？政府都多少赤字了？你这是外债！可不是我们这种内部债…科研团队你们大佬多，但是我们也不少啊！拼发展，你们才多少毕业生？现在还卡留学移民搞反华……自己大学生被资本家洗劫的毕业就欠巨款…整天心思都在找“甜心老爹”上，你们研发队伍后继真的乏力啊……而且自由主义的个人价值观是基本很难出我们这种两弹元勋的贡献牺牲精神伟人的…… 随便说说，你们美国就算拼发展，你这一大堆问题解决不了，明显劣势…说实话你以为川普和其他人不懂？很多人就是太知道了，发展干啥都没啥用，逼得走投无路才搞贸易战搏国运… 想一起打世界经济，大家共同牺牲一点搞事来促出战略机遇？醒醒！中国6的增速，美国2左右，咱们ppp还比你高，工业制造业更是比你大得多，我们金融股市在低位，泡沫低、依存度小，美股金融在高位，泡沫远高08规模，依存度极高…我们是随时可以干预的社会主义，你们是效率低下遮遮掩掩还要党争的两党资本主义，你拿什么和我们自损八百的同归于尽？要拉全球经济下水，先崩溃的也是你美国啊…… 我们战略早就制定了并且在快车道上走，你们的战略哪怕就如文章一般制定好了，问题车能开起来不？谁开？目前有能挑大梁的政治家么？ 一个从来没打过逆风局的民族，和身经百战的老玩家说 不要低估我们，呵呵，你也就200年历史……哪个没探过底，价值被高估还真不知道呢！

Rob Calvert You are right in saying this talk is disappointing. It is more along the lines of a surface overview of the current state of play in the economic and political realms of China/U.S. relations.

Why don't you think of a way to end poverty instead of to be thinking of a way to eliminate those countries that are improving their economy and their citizen's life?

@varivavariva6045

5 жыл бұрын

Well said!

As an “investment banker” you should be aware of China’s shadow banking crises

@PseudoProphet

5 жыл бұрын

At best China will slow down to 4.5-5% and that's just not enough to stop them.

i think U.S. needs to focus on its own development. It has spent so much resources on foreign affairs, which didn’t return much.

All the Hi-tech invented by America? There are a lot of Europeans and Australians, and others who would totally dispute that. American gave us the mega corporatisation of that technology with money, not innovation being the significant driver.

@wbafc1231

5 жыл бұрын

@The War for the West Are you an adult?

@nayanmalig

5 жыл бұрын

@The War for the West LOL if not for Chinese inventions you would not be able to wipe the shit off your silly ass - nor read a manual on computers - without zero and one there would be no computers - BTW Americans robbed all the German inventions and call it their own - trying to own everything in the world by being boastful, brash and genocidal will end with losing everything

@danielboot78

5 жыл бұрын

The Americans have been and currently are masters of monetising ideas, that is a big part of their success. Here in the UK we have produced many great world changing inventions but never monetised them effectively, and they are then assumed to have originated with the USA. The cavity magnetron is a good example

@nayanmalig

5 жыл бұрын

@@danielboot78 Monetizing is pocket money - America virtually monopolizes the art of monetizing terrorism and genocide of third world civilians, occupying their lands illegally, looting all the resources, unleashing terrorism and calling it democracy - most Americans think they should be given Nobel prizes for this - Like Obama received - in fact after he received the Noble prize he was forced to prove his recipient value by devastating Libya, Syria etc and looting them dry.

@nayanmalig

5 жыл бұрын

​@The War for the West LOL USA would have nothing if not for mass murder, looting, occupation and forcing their currency on others. The leading technological innovators since WW 2 are Germany and Japan which are both illegally occupied by USA - USA stole technology from all their vassals and call it their own - USA also stole Huwawei equipment and is not returning it - Huwawei is suing USA rogues LOL - so if China "stole' technology USA can go to courts without crying like girls 24 hrs non stop - So quit crying, be grateful and kiss the nearest Chinese ass LMAO

quite many inaccuracies

And you need a population growth, a home grown population, not a foreign force that outnumbers Americans.

I dont know in military terms but one thing is certain that their economy will become the largest in the world .

4:15 you can really tell it's a quote from Trump...

How does he know that China does'nt want to supplant US hegemony? So many things that he knows that even a chinese do not know😉

@pennhughes5485

4 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't count on them not wanting to take over the world. not sure why we should want to help them do it, unless the big banks think they can keep them in line

@badgerstate3451

4 жыл бұрын

Commie lies, Comrade.

I loved this talk. I plan on reading and listening to Mr Goldman a lot more in the future. One question though, what happens if 5G technology turns out to cause cancer as some are saying?

No doubt NEO CON. Welfare for corporations. Public investment in private profits.

Very eloquent and well put together! From Australia.

Ideological struggle is good. It clarifies things

@mitchellalexander8508

5 жыл бұрын

Ideological struggle is a lie sold to energize your population. Interests are the only thing that matters geopolitically

A grand strategy is at the end of the day nothing but a concept and a wish. Everything is still contingent on the present. And China’s realizing that as we speak

That was very informative.

Clearly this guy has investments in China.

@jetxie432

5 жыл бұрын

even trump has investment in china dude

One of the best schoolars on China studies. I am saying this from a Chinese's perspective.

It is naïve to believe that you can take highly qualified and gifted people from China to work in tech industries in the west - and for them not to be pressured by China to reveal any new technologies back home

@DC-ek6ib

3 жыл бұрын

👍😁 that's actually funny you think about it.

Excellent conference and Q&A.

Its cool man Im tall and white and love asian girls.

The world has changed and its ok

As a Chinese, I would say this respectful scholar is a true strategy elite for the US

Wasn't Heritage all about outsourcing to China modernizing them?

So with all the facts on the table, China is not so evil after all right?

Abe Lincoln said it best: we're our own worst enemy.

有没有人能翻译一下？加上中文字幕。我相信很多生活在大陆的人听起来还是很吃力。

@ahwuang

5 жыл бұрын

二月鸟 你付钱？

@fuaka1343

4 жыл бұрын

他说要利用全国资源作与中国对抗的长期计划。要控制半导体行业，减少技术转让，联合日本韩国印度分化一带一路，对中国秘密发动人才流失计划。西方人的世界观就是这种对抗的，我估计美国的新“NSC68号文件”已经在制定之中或者已经制定好了。

@user-xc2ye7jp1r

4 жыл бұрын

在观察者网有翻译的文字版，去看吧。

One of the best analysis.

The most fundamental mistake that some of the US thinkers and politicians keep making is to look into the mirror when they try to determine the intentions of other nations. Just because the US is bent on taking and maintaining global supremacy does not mean that other nations such as China are also determined on this path. In fact China does not care what other nations do, how they lead their lives and what their political systems are like. Not like the US, China is not interested in exporting its ideologies or institutions. It is a very introvert country with the top priority being the welfare of its own citizens, because that has been the place where traditionally the legitimacy to rule lies in. That is also why throughout its long years of history China seldom engages in wars with other nations (except for under Mongolian rule which was a different culture than its own) and most of its external interactions are in the form of trade or tribute.

Nokia and Sony Ericsson? What ls this ? 2006?

@DongsMBM

5 жыл бұрын

I think he's talking about infrastructure aspect of these companies which ericsson and nokia handles building 5G networks in countries that banned huawei

If no protection on innovations, no incentives to promote R&D. You have to do both . .

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

Is that how you justify patenting the shape of the square and the shape of the circle? Or is that how you justify discriminatory access to ideas that actually improve people's lives? Nobody is arguing against patents, but the devil is always in the details. Yes, "democracy" and "human rights" will always be free, to be freely imposed on China when China knows its true colors. And yet, technology, even when freely available for everybody else to purchase, is denied China. Fuck the "free world".

The problem with a geopolitical analysis is that it ignores the financial / economic base. It is like forecasting the success of a man based on his psychology or nature alone, while in ignorance of the fact that the food he eats is slowly poisoning him.

1.4 b Chinese in China plus 1b oversea Chinese,if they work together,do you think USA can win?

@applepie5171

5 жыл бұрын

daigames sg only if

@QuicKnDead911

5 жыл бұрын

Ask the 30k US troops that took on 120k chinese in the only direct battle between US andChinese military forces, the Chinese didnt do so well at the Chosin Reservior.

@stuartbudgen1426

5 жыл бұрын

What happens when you need to feed them all and care for them when they start to age?

@dragondescendant1

5 жыл бұрын

@@QuicKnDead911 non professional Chinese soldiers actually did very well at the Chosin Reservoir, that's why MacArthur wind up at the 38th parallel, not Chosin Reservoir Chinese border. China achieved their objective by kicking MacArthur out, while U.S. troops failed their objective by keeping korea in one piece. Objective of war is achieving objective, not counting casualties.

@ex0duzz

5 жыл бұрын

Steven T lol considering china had a bag of rice and using rifles only, and still held nuclear USA and the world to a draw should tell you something. There's a reason why it's the "forgotten war", USA doesn't want to remember painful memories.

Chinese are loyal to their homeland. You need a form of American Nationalism, like China has, but it should produce a work force, not a foreign invasion military.

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

Uh American Nationalism is already that which enables its "all volunteer armed forces", all of whom volunteered to slaughter under the banners of "human rights" and "democracy". American Nationalism is also that which enables americans to disregard the english dictionary as it spews bizarre accusations against China as if the rest of the world is entirely illiterate or willingly complicit. I wouldn't want to guess what heightened American Nationalism would look like. Oh never mind, I know what it'd look like: Nazi Germany.

@mitchellalexander8508

5 жыл бұрын

American nationalism is going strong. In that this is God's country and it is our destiny to carry the torch of western civilisations through our day to day life. Many of us have been misguided from this from foreign entities, pushing them towards decadence and hedonism. But the ones who do not indulge that, are the most powerful. Americans are strong. Our bosses, not so much. It is all out there for the average American citizen. We can trace our roots out of Europe, we have texts, we have our "lie". We have the ability to be actualized it's just whoever is in charge decided it was a waste of time. I call that sedition but alas. American citizens are motivated and actualized. They are ripe for a strong leader. Not Trump. Someone else. All we are missing is a powerful oratory leader

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

@@mitchellalexander8508 Might I suggest Hitler for that task, fits like a glove

@mitchellalexander8508

5 жыл бұрын

@@readingRoom100 You're really bad at this

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

@@mitchellalexander8508 The mirror never lies

Very good points made.

SUPER SUPER COOL INFORMATION ))) THANKS )))

wow, real facts...

@onekerri1

5 жыл бұрын

I commend you for being here; it shows you're willing to learn. Next, learn truth from untruth, and half truths. Half truths are what liars use to gain trust. You 'wow' easily.

The more you worry about China, the more you block your vision. the more you act against China, the more you offset the trend.

Thanks so much. Peace and blessings.

It needs to look at the Swiss Model of Government, the German model of industry. This is what China and Japan did, they took on succesful models and were willing to adapt. No change in its Socio-political system is the main cause of stagnation.

这是真正的美国精英，可怕的但值得尊敬的对手

@J244

5 жыл бұрын

也就那么回事儿吧。 说中国经济控制邻国，美国不也是军事控制全球使劲卖军火？ 说华为不杀死诺基亚爱立信，英特尔不也留着AMD？ 说华为雇佣外国员工类比蒙古，哪个跨国公司不雇佣外国人，四大不全是全球精英汇聚？ 说中国发动农民进城打工大搞工业，难道中国9亿农民永远脸朝黄土背朝天？ 说白了美国人只想赚快钱，自己阉割了实体经济。现在后悔了，要把实体经济逼出中国迁回美国。 本质上就是霸权指正，少来什么自由民主人权，最终把自己都忽悠瘸了。

@LiLi-hn8mq

5 жыл бұрын

@@J244 立场不谈，至少对现实有一定的认识

@J244

5 жыл бұрын

@@LiLi-hn8mq 认识是比很多美国人强。关键还在于美国能不能改革使自己进步。目前的美国做法仅仅停留在打爬中国以保持第一的这个思想层次，不算什么高明的战略，没啥值得钦佩的。

@lsynder

5 жыл бұрын

比班农更了解亚洲和中国，但大方向是一致的，本质上还是零和思维，维护我就必须搞掉你

@fuaka1343

4 жыл бұрын

@@lsynder 西方人根深蒂固的善恶二元论：基督与撒旦

These introductions run so long that I give up before the speaker arrives. Isn't the speaker already under enough time pressure? Introduce him and get off the stage. We're not interested in the introduction; we want the analysis.

@Westminsterinstitute

5 жыл бұрын

Lecture starts at 3:45

@deltasierratango127

5 жыл бұрын

Are you serious? Smh.

@thetedmang

5 жыл бұрын

Spoken like a man whose never put together any kind of event.

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

@@thetedmang Spoken like a man WHO HAS never produced a youtube video, and how do you know he's not a woman behind a man's profile?

@thetedmang

5 жыл бұрын

@@readingRoom100 You missed the point.

is that chris chapel in the front row? 43:40

If US doesn't react soon, it will be too late.

When people talk about Chinese history I think: "5,000 years of eating a shit sandwich" for the average person.

1. US cannot surprise China and take the lead in hi-tech industries because it destroyed its education system 15 years back for an easier 'society management'. Uneducated = easy to manage and manipulate, and 2. People in 'developing' countries are not laying around day after day, the just usually need more time to get to drinking water, or food, or some other necessity. Something we do in a shop across the street, others need to travel to get. And I will add this too 3. Once upon a time US was the first country to have electric lightning in a city (N.Y.), they had John Vayne, Charles Bronson, cowboys and indians, sexy red lipstick, jeans, sneakers, chewing gum, Lucky Strike, stockings and Hollywood. Hell, they took us to the moon!! Now they have greed, money-god, selfishness, threats, blackmail, arm twisting, users agreement small print frauds, and last leftovers of good quality people dying out really quickly. Those that come to replenish are really ways behind and below. This of course is all because of #1 and the military industrial complex that ate so much money from humanity and from the needs of the world, and caused the world to watch in shock. We should be having plastic cleaning drones, reforestation on massive levels, automated ore processors on the moon, colonies on Mars, but noooo we need to chase Osama and secure opium for our pharmaceutical companies. And we need Iraq oil and to repay saudis for crediting us and we need to return Iran's oil reserves to the British Petrol corporation. SHORT SIGHTED IDIOTS - YOU BETRAYED US ALL!

Excellent overview for the current conundrum. The quantum computing is a sub-field of quantum information science, which includes quantum cryptography and quantum communication. Quantum computing is the future and GREED will determine which country gets there first.

@readingRoom100

5 жыл бұрын

wtf? pls have a more substantial vocabulary than "greed" as your answer for everything

1. I do agree America has grossly underestimated China for too long. 2. There are many aspects of the Chinese Economic model that, ironically enough, now the US should be copying from China.

China was the first civilization, refined and even wearing silk, making clever objects such as seismic detection devices long before western "barbarians" even though of such a thing, inventing movable type, oil drilling machinery, crossbows and gunpowder long before anyone else --(sorry, Mr. Nobel, they beat you be hundreds of years). Despite having all this powerful technology, they never attacked neighboring countries, even though they had great fleets of ship that visited those foreign lands and peacefully traded with them. Why? They were "the WORLD" --- the "Middle Kingdom" --- and they did not feel it necessary to go out and expand as "colonialists" ( as the Roman Empire surely was , plundering distant provinces [ like Judea ] and also making slaves of conquered peoples -- get it ).Marco Pole testified to the grandeur of ancient China during his many travels. Ah, but for two hundred years, westerners attacked China and began to plunder her --- using some of her own inventions against her! Most recently, China rightly noticed the dissolution of the former Soviet Union (U.S.S.R.) and she thought "THAT will NOT HAPPEN TO ME!", and so can you blame her for solidifying her control over her own people. In China, people view their government as a very "fatherly" institution. As JFK once put it, "Ask nt what your country can do for you, but rather ask 'What can I DO, to help improve my country?' " That includes (above all) REFORMING your government when it errs. Sadly, American watch their leaders ride roughshod over their own values (freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and above all--- FREEDOM OF RELIGION , but that must ban those whose religion is "get away with MURDER" --- and then put on a red cap and say "Oh, I've done nothing". In fact, the Bible Donald Trump was sworn in on even says that to say that is a patent L I E (Jeremiah 5:12). Is that man a teller of lies and half-truth, always favoring himself? Can one really COMMIT MURDER ON 5TH AVE -- and people would do NOTHING? Or is the man who said that the REAL ENEMY, the one not "morally correct"? Jesus said, ""Suffer the little children to come unto me, b ut what did this ARROGANT REPUBLICAN SAY? He said "Let the suffer! Out them in cages and let them weep all night --- I DON'T CARE ( wasn't that also written by someone on the back of Melanija's coat?). Can a person who approves of such inhuman behavior later enter HEAVEN? How do you judge (Psalm 58)? He may be President, but God is definitely not a "respecter of persons" (all kings and princes also have to die and come face-to face with god in that hour, too --- and the real hell is surely in the bodies of filthy animals--- the "beasts which perish" (Psalm 49 explains, verse 8-12*, 29* & Psalm 73:6-12*). And what did Jesus say? BY THEIR DEEDS YOU WILL KNOW THEM! (Mt. 7:9*, 20*). What do you think, ,folks? Will Trump and his blood hungry pack of ":red caps" now take out a contract on my life AND MURDER ME, RIGHT HERE IN AMER*CA -- simply for quoting some Bible verses that UNMASKS THEM ? ? ? Well . . . let's FIND OUT! I have taken a vow to the Lord (He's with me, bent his ear down to me and "take my part" EVERY DAY (Psalm 116:2*,6:*, 10-16* The bullet that penetrates my skull will free me from my chains...and I will stand in HEAVEN ABOVE [ a place those red-caps failed to believe in ]. And in that day, they'll ALL be "ashes under my foot soles" when I stand there triumphant in Heaven (Malachi 4:3-6). Be sure to spend more time with your kids and teach them to "avoid them" --- you know, the ones whose religion is "SWALLOW UP PEOPLE ALIVE and to "get away with MURDER " (Proverbs 1:10-18). In your heart, you know i am "right" (Isaiah 41:26-29*). SHALOM (to those nearby, and ALSO TO THOSE FAR AWAY, Is.57). PS: It's NOT GOD (what they have), but they "sow the wind" --- and they will reap the "WHIRLWIND" (Hosea 8:7-12 + 11:5* + Jeremiah 2:31*-37, Isaiah 45:19*-22, Isaiah 44:8, Deuteronomy 32:29-31*, 37*, Isaiah 8:13-17, 3:8-15, 5:18-20*).

@eleganz

5 жыл бұрын

Bruh nobody types this much on youtube comments, you're a bot.

@MrCordycep

5 жыл бұрын

Alfred Nobel developed invented dynamite, not gunpowder. Never attacking neighbouring countries? Which is why China is in possession of land that was not inhabited by Han Chinese people?

@tancsun

5 жыл бұрын

What are you smoking bro?

@goldsilvervscrisiscollapse4320

5 жыл бұрын

@@MrCordycep China hasn't conquered another country since centuries ago. At that rate America should give up its land to the native

@goldsilvervscrisiscollapse4320

5 жыл бұрын

@@eleganz that makes zero sense

The history of the world is the invasion of one people conquering another. -- Napoleon

@madeinchina1450

5 жыл бұрын

Except one -- the one that built the Great Wall.

@rerite2

5 жыл бұрын

@@madeinchina1450 Although a useful deterrent against raids, at several points throughout its history the Great Wall failed to stop enemies, including in 1644 when the Manchu Qing marched through the gates of Shanhai Pass and replaced the most ardent of the wall-building dynasties, the Ming, as rulers of China.

@madeinchina1450

5 жыл бұрын

@@rerite2 My point is that the Han Chinese did not do [the invasion of one people conquering another]. The territory expansion of China was the job of other groups of people (not the Han Chinese). In recent history (recent 500-600 years), Tibet was taken by Mongolian while Xinjiang was taken by Manchu Qing. The Han Chinese just continues the land administration.

@Is-sc8pm

5 жыл бұрын

@@rerite2 one big huge han coward turned the page of history, what can u do, nothing. at least its not the end of the world.

Individualism vs Collectivism. We are destined to collide

@azysheff

5 жыл бұрын

Capitalism vs Communism essentially

@4n4tr4

5 жыл бұрын

azysheff china is not a comunist sistem! It’s a capitalism sistem with comunist party as lead!

@meganh9460

5 жыл бұрын

@@azysheff Those are just by products of individualism and collectivism. There is no point focusing on them when the true battle has always been individualism vs collectivism in all forms.

@meganh9460

5 жыл бұрын

@@4n4tr4 They are a mixed economy, They have accepted Capitalism in some forms as of course they enjoy the benefits while still being able to control their economic growth in the non private one.

Excellent and Accurate assessment of the CCP threat. Think a rich and powerful Russia. Sould we outsource our critical infrastructure to Russia?

@sungai447

5 жыл бұрын

you shud since America hate china so much.

@AlanHernandez-jn2mp

5 жыл бұрын

@@sungai447 noooooo America love China .... We love Chineese food ! Jacky Chan ! Kung Fu!

@AlanHernandez-jn2mp

5 жыл бұрын

@@sungai447 CHINA TOWN

@ex0duzz

5 жыл бұрын

Analog Engineering Associates, Inc. your example is crap. China already makes all your goods, including your current 2g/3G/4g networks. They also make all your consumer goods and clothes, and china also lend you trillions and saved you from 2008 recession. Would Russia do all that? Or would Russia call in the trillions USA owns and crash USA economy?