so the God particle walks into church and says "HEY! there will be no MASS without me!"

@hermeswright523

8 жыл бұрын

+unoefxz Enjoyed that, thanks! Furthermore it's deep, VERY deep.

@questionablethings6995

6 жыл бұрын

The higgs boson is not responsible for mass, so I don't find this very humerous. 3/10

@GuamanianBlood619

6 жыл бұрын

unoefxz that was such a physics teacher joke lol

@dell2295

6 жыл бұрын

your comment is ......questionable....

@dopamineater8427

5 жыл бұрын

it's the higgs field that's responsible for giving mass to particles not the higgs boson

"You me and love" he did it so smoothly 😂

@nahommekonen3092

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

"'God Particle' also called Higgs Boson" I don't want to live on this planet anymore...

@captainjacksparrow3221

3 жыл бұрын

That's how media attract stupid people

Even if scientists destroy the universe by accident it's not like anyone would be around to yell at them for it

@lnopia

8 жыл бұрын

+Puzzles It would be quick and painless, can't ask for a better death then that

@Proloyable

6 жыл бұрын

Dying is better than staying ignorant about mankind's creation.....

@azomy0123456789

6 жыл бұрын

Pro cool No its not

@Iburn247

6 жыл бұрын

If I get a vote I'd like to vote no on the destroying of the universe thing. Is that still being passed around?

@sureshbiswakarma5378

5 жыл бұрын

You bullshit

lol she's trying so hard not to feel lost.

@13sage13

7 жыл бұрын

What a strange place to explain something that normally would take hours to explain to the public. A couple minutes on CNN to explain the universe! Haha. Of course she's lost, Kaku shouldn't even be there talking to the looney toon come on people for realz.

@methlokaijuthekaijuexpert

5 жыл бұрын

I would as well because the Higgs is not responsible for being the spark of the universe. I have no idea why he said that.

@beetlejuice4357

3 жыл бұрын

This is because he is lieing and trying to explain a made up lie.

@beetlejuice4357

3 жыл бұрын

@@methlokaijuthekaijuexpert He is a gatekeeper just like Neal Degrees Tyson and Bill Nye.

The reason this particle is sometimes called the "god particle" instead of its formal title the "Higgs boson" is because physicist Leon Lederman wrote a book about the particle and wanted to call the book "The Goddamned Particle". This title was given out of frustration of having a theory devised in 1964 to explain mass generation for some of the fundamental particles but not having experimental evidence to support the theory. The publisher didn't want to use this name, so the book was named 'The God Particle.'* *Source: I've heard Peter Higgs himself explain why the term "god particle" exists in two different interviews. It's simply the renaming of a book title. So not only are people who think it has anything to do with a god wrong about what the boson DOES, they would actually be offended by what the original name for the book WAS. The Higgs boson is the quantum of the Higgs field in a similar way that the photon is the quantum of the electromagnetic field. The Higgs *mechanism* explains how the Higgs field interacts with some of the fundamental particles to give them the property of mass. The particles which acquire mass through the Higgs mechanism include all fermions and weakly-interacting vector gauge bosons (the W+, W- and Z0 bosons. The photon and gluon do not acquire a mass and therefore move through the vacuum of empty space at the velocity of light (c).

@GonnaBeTragedy

8 жыл бұрын

+MikeRoePhonicsMusic it seems that kaku is explaining that the "god particle" is named this because it is the trigger for the big bang, which created the universe, which most people believe is god's work

@lawrencedoliveiro9104

Жыл бұрын

That is right. It was just a name born out of frustration, not anything more profound than that.

@b.l.0427

11 ай бұрын

Bososn because its first told by s.n.bose

"you me even love" what i see there is he's hitting on her in a nerdy way :))

@GBabuu

3 жыл бұрын

LoL. I thought the same

@sastindxa7

3 жыл бұрын

Damn you got me here..I thought the same 🤣🤣🤣

God was already there before the universe was created. God is not human. He is all that is and ever was. No human terms can describe God for its very complex. This machine will revolutionize everything.

@nathannjh

9 жыл бұрын

THEFIFTHDIMENTION There is one human term that can describe god, fake.

@davidoconnell1631

9 жыл бұрын

nathannjh Nothing scientific about that dumb statement.

@DasAntiNaziBroetchen

9 жыл бұрын

David O'Connell He didn't even claim it was scientific. :^)

@rich1051414

9 жыл бұрын

THEFIFTHDIMENTION By your very definition of god, he does not exist. Something that exists is something that can be measured. If you cannot measure it, then it does not exist. You know what else existed before the universe? Nothing. This is what god is. Nothing. He doesn't exist. At least take your god to another dimension where science hasn't made it yet, so you can believe your fairy tales in piece.

@Ganulous

9 жыл бұрын

+Richard Smith What do you mean by "measured"?

I wonder how many watched this because of the second season of Dark.

@paulandremorandarte2285

4 жыл бұрын

I did...

This was the WORST explanation of the Higgs Boson/Higgs Field I've ever heard. I call BS.

@CD-123

7 жыл бұрын

Ryan West I too think that way

@sharpie6888

6 жыл бұрын

Ryan West no it's because you're stupid

@azomy0123456789

6 жыл бұрын

Can you explain it to us ? (Try to make it simple)

@jordantistetube

6 жыл бұрын

Agreed with the OP. The discovery of the Higgs says nothing about what happened before the Big Bang. The discovery of the Higgs Boson proves the existence of the Higgs field, which says that vacuum has a non-trivial energy associated to it. The field was initially postulated to explain why particles have mass. In the end, certain particles travel throughout the universe but interact and are 'slowed down' by this field. This 'slowing down' is experienced as those particles having mass. Interestingly, the neutrino is a particle whose mass is not explained! As the SM is written, there should be no interaction between the neutrino and the Higgs field.

@methlokaijuthekaijuexpert

5 жыл бұрын

Ryan West Totally agree. I heard by many he made a similar blunder on CBS. Now thousands will think the Higgs Boson is the reason why our universe exists. He seems to have confused it with the Inflaton.

Michio Kaku has the talent of explaining physics in very understandable manner.

@Centurion86

6 ай бұрын

This is very poorley explained...a guy is a youtuber and thats it

@fntime

6 ай бұрын

@@Centurion86 Why so? :)

This guy's always been my favorite physicist.

@Centurion86

6 ай бұрын

Michio Kaku is just an influencer but yes in the negative way, a youtuber...he has no works and nothing. He is not a scientist but yes he is a great salesman!

@DamagedF0X

6 ай бұрын

@@Centurion86 Oh really? I never followed him much at all. Kind of like Neil. I suppose I should have said Kaku was a better spokesperson for physics.

"Science may actually disprove religion?" That has to be the dumbest question of all time

@browserboy1984

2 жыл бұрын

Just CNN being CNN.

He said "... the broken world we have to day, planets, stars, galaxies, you, me, even love."

01:05 you me even love,,,, this is mind game, now she will never forget what she heard about higgs boson, this is the way to teach physics that students do not forget the concept,,,, loved it 😊

Anyone else notice how she melts at 1:06 when Kaku says "You, me, even love. All of it from this explosion"?

Actually "God Particle" is short for "Goddamn Particle."

@kingj6677

Жыл бұрын

Okay Joe.

Did anyone else catch Mr kaku trying to spit game "me you even love" ..he hit that later that night loool 

@UnWorld

9 жыл бұрын

BlueCheese Devgru Yes the sly devil was a hittin' :)

@nmarbletoe8210

9 жыл бұрын

MAXIMUS DISLIKEIS [DSQUD] Micho: "this is deep, this is really deep"

@bjmartinphotography

9 жыл бұрын

MAXIMUS DISLIKEIS [DSQUD] I'll hit it.

@nmarbletoe8210

9 жыл бұрын

MAXIMUS DISLIKEIS [DSQUD] 1:20, she: "this is the beginning of a very, very big..."

@Huxtee7

9 жыл бұрын

MAXIMUS DISLIKEIS [DSQUD] Haha He hit that harrrrrrrrrd and deeeeeep

I have never heard a better explanation of GOD saying, "Let there be Light" And Jesus Creating that Light. The Lord Jesus Being The Word of God, The Lesser or the Second personality of the God Head, the Son of God. John 1:3 “All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.” hence the 'God particle'. This is the best explanation that I have ever heard Period Thank you Dr. Mickio Kaku.

I like watching the scientist try to explain something they don't actually understand themselves nor do they know anything about what they're talking about. When that happens you start hearing things like maybe, might, could be, somehow and probably. I don't blame him when it comes to how things actually work we don't know jackshit. We only know what we can observe and even then we don't know the how or why.

Dr Michio Kaku always makes science so much easier to understand.

I just finished Dr. Kaku's book "Parallel Worlds", which is a fascinating and easy to understand book (thanks to Dr. Kaku's down to Earth ways of explaining things to novices such as myself). I highly recommend it to anyone who is curious about physics, cosmology, and/or the theoretical existence of multiple universes or parallel worlds. It's a very interesting read.

He explains beautiful things except the important one; Higgs Boson.

Religion will never disappear because man needs a creator. Only when AI take over can logic grow and flourish.

I think this is where Nelson from "The Simpsons" goes "ha, ha".

yes i am quite serious, i read plenty of physics books and other science books and i encountered somethings that i thought are conflicting to religion but when i dug deeper and made a few researches, i found that they were not conflicting at all.

Further explanation: It's not really the Higgs Boson that gives particles mass, it's the Higgs Field. The Higgs Field is present everywhere, and massive particles get their masses because they couple to the Higgs Field and are always passing through it. The Higgs Boson itself isn't really all that important - it decays in 10^-22 seconds and takes a shitload of energy to produce in the first place. The reason we were looking for it is just because it implies the existence of the Higgs Field.

I'm a bit confused when he mentioned crystal at 0:40. Was he using an example?

@abstractheory

8 жыл бұрын

+Christian charles It's the same way they describe the original super force that became the four forces that govern the universe(S/W Nuclear,Electromagnetic, and Gravity)as having fractured off into those four forces. It was indeed an example to aid your imagination. The crystal was like pure energy, but then it shattered, and splintered off into fractures we call sub-Atomic particles(electrons, protons, neutrons, etc.)which suddenly had something new: Mass. The discovery of the Higgs Boson helped us solve the mystery of why mass exists. Without it the universe would be a boring field of radiation. Instead, you have mass. The iron in your blood, and the calcium in your bones which came from giant stars that exploded millions of years ago have mass, and all of the particles in the universe have mass. To understand it look at the laser from a laser pointer, and look at a coat hanger. Both can produce the same amount of particles, but the laser pointer has less mass. Why? Because it doesn't react as much to the Higgs field(which is everywhere)as the particles in the coat hanger. I hope this helps, and if anyone has any corrections please feel free! We're all students when it comes to science.

What if we split the Higgs?

@lowlycalvin5644

8 жыл бұрын

+Johnny English My bet is that it would be like splitting an atom, but ending with a bigger explosion.

@J2897Tutorials

8 жыл бұрын

Calvin Weustink That was my thoughts. But I would like to know how big. Maybe the last time it happened was at the very beginning of our known universe. :)

@lowlycalvin5644

8 жыл бұрын

***** It must have been a very big explosion then :P

@JuTakii

6 жыл бұрын

If the big bang was even real *cough*

@mchaelmachine80904k

6 жыл бұрын

Johnny English, PhD can't split a fundamental particle

no matter what you say it will always point back to God

@DasAntiNaziBroetchen

9 жыл бұрын

Angela Rotola Because the concept "god" cannot be disproven and is therefore completely unscientific and irrelevant.

@CeezGeez

9 жыл бұрын

It could also point to a big potato chip in the sky. Yes... It can point to anything you want. It's like mad libs. You can fill in the story with whatever you like/fear.

@CeezGeez

9 жыл бұрын

Siaka G.

@rich1051414

9 жыл бұрын

Angela Rotola God is a placeholder for all that you do not understand. It is impossible to understand everything, as there is always more to understand so in that regard you are right. The point in which 'God' represents the hole in your misunderstanding is just that, a hole, the quicker you will realize that God is a hole(nothing, in case you are lacking in your understanding of metaphors). He doesn't exist, just like your understanding doesn't exist. You do not need to understand something for something to function. If you think a being needs to understand to make something work, then that is a problem in your ego. The universe, and everything in it, would continue ticking with or without humans, with or without the concept of god. Your understanding, or the understanding of anyone, is not required. The universe does not need god to explain it for it to work. In this, the idea of god is a creation to fill all that we don't understand, and is no more real than the fairy tales we tell kids to scare them into behaving, as they can't understand yet why they actually should.

@DasAntiNaziBroetchen

9 жыл бұрын

Richard Smith "God is a placeholder for all that you do not understand." THIS.

To give people an understanding, the higgs boson's are particles without mass or shape. Every single thing in existence starts off as a higgs boson, but once it passes the the higgs field, it gains it's shape and mass.

@acelinomckinzie1956

3 жыл бұрын

The Higgs boson does have mass, and particles moving through Higgs field acquires their various masses.

How can smashing two particles create sub particles? I understand smashing two particles creating more particles but never de creating sub particles. Like smashing two glass bottles to create small particles not creating new ones it's same particles only smaller

I have always loved Dr. Kaku's vision and intelligence... But whether or not religion can be proved or disproved is irrelevant. The majority of humans aren't ready to even entertain the conversation.. and I think trying to force the discussion only hurts our ability to make other less controversial discoveries. I don't mean to say we should not do this research, I just think we should not be throwing it in their faces.

@slayerx36

9 жыл бұрын

***** Amen. A-fucking-men.

@nmarbletoe8210

9 жыл бұрын

***** agree, and i don't think he was really trying to bring it in as a debate, but just being dramatic. Genesis is a word that rings, religious or not it gets the idea across that this Higgs thing was important perhaps before time began

@13sage13

7 жыл бұрын

Why not, that's exactly what the "God-crazed" people of the past did to "witches" by tying them up in a sack and throwing them into water to see if they floated to prove they were witches. Religion 0 science 1.

the blonde understood nothing.

@ghassensmaoui6060

9 жыл бұрын

kevin oduor and neither did I

@yelobone

6 жыл бұрын

She knows how to look good tho...

@lezliemiguelabecia9311

5 жыл бұрын

Atleast she's white

I’m a layman, but it seems the most obvious & logical explanation for particles acting like polarizable axial or circular, helical waves as they travel is that they’re orbiting something (a dark (or anti) matter particle perhaps). It's not unlike Earth being pulled into a wobble by the moon, or a distant star's wobble evidencing planet orbits making our trajectories as we fly thru space have an apparent axial or circular helical wave (like a packet) as well, depending on the orientation of the orbit. And since we think we know undetectable dark matter exists and should be 5 times as common as matter but don't yet know where it's distributed, it seems a logical possibility that we are in a sea of dark matter (the Higgs field), even in otherwise empty space, and every particle (photons, electrons, etc) is paired (entangled) in orbit with one. I think gravitational waves could be dark matter waves and that gravity might be caused by the density of dark matter. This could explain the double slit experiment results, including with a detector with some interaction between the dark matter and the detector (and perhaps dark matter entanglement), it could explain the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, as well as explain the deflection of the axis of the particle's wave motion (orbit orientation) moving thru polarizing filters rotated less than 45 degrees apart, etc. Perhaps the only reason for photons' max speed limit is caused by the dark matter they're paired in orbit with interacting with other dark matter. This could also explain why the universe is expanding from the central singularity point of the big bang outward in all directions faster than the speed of light into previously completely empty universe space, given that there is no dark matter there yet.

This is giving me goosebumps on a positive scale! So much excitement!

Wow!! interesting stuff. Thanks Professor Kaku.

No matter how accuretly we know how the universe came to be, the answer is always gonna be " god did it "... Even today, there should be no reason to think that any holybook is true but still the argument is always the same..."god did it"... Can't reason with crazy

@MushroomStorm123

8 жыл бұрын

+Richard Rihmasto more like stupid.

@djmaydraws3862

6 жыл бұрын

Richard Rihmasto saying our universe came from another universe still leaves us with the same question, what started the entire process? All science is telling us is that matter came from preexisting matter, it's obvious they're skating around the idea that if humans can create something as complex as a higgs-boson particle accelerator then something infinitely more complicated, the universe (or the multiverse as Mr. Kaku suggests) had to come from an intelligence as well. Try as they might that accelerator isn't gonna make itself, they need a team of scientists to build it. So if we compare the energy that the accelerator gives off to the energy in the big bang then what force in the universe do the scientists that built it represent? People think that science is disproving God but the truth of the matter is the more complex their discoveries get the more likely an intelligence had to be behind it

@Psych-dc7uc

6 жыл бұрын

bunch of BS, you are using god of the gaps, just because we dont know how everything started doesnt mean GOD DID IT.

@h2oC2

6 жыл бұрын

General Scientific Postulate #1: All that Man knows and will ever know, is already known by God.

@Psych-dc7uc

6 жыл бұрын

before you call it scientific and start claiming all sorts of claims you need to prove god exists

Why can’t anyone give a straight forward answer to the question “What is the Higgs Boson?” Not just “Oh it’s this and it does that.” Why do we need it? What problem does it solve? What is the theory behind its prediction. I’m not stupid, I can tell when I’m being lied to.

So how and from where did those two particles came from

Hey science deniers, tell you what. Get off the internet, pray your message to god, and ask god to relay it to the rest of us.. If that works, you may be on to something, otherwise? Science FTW.

@frodowiz

2 жыл бұрын

the same could be said for armchair lapdogs. your statement is as childish as the current trend in putting quantum in front of everything. the reason you don't see scientists practicing religion is funding. they cant capture or measure God so while in the same room as the boss they pretend it doesn't exist. keep that sweet funding coming in.

"This is how science may disprove religion", how?

@Ganulous

9 жыл бұрын

+Flex 20in nice argument!!1

@Ganulous

9 жыл бұрын

+Flex 20in another nice argument!!1

@Ganulous

9 жыл бұрын

+Flex 20in man these arguments getting better and better!!1

@Ganulous

9 жыл бұрын

+Flex 20in wow what a cool guy!!1

@Ganulous

9 жыл бұрын

+Flex 20in wow what a great guy!!1

Yes* and yes. The mass of the Higgs Boson is ~125 GeV (i.e. 2e-25 kg) *The Higgs is responsible for fundamental particle masses. Composite particles, on the other hand, such as protons and neutrons (which are made of quarks), get most of their masses from virtual particles arising from strong and electromagnetic force interactions.

Salute to SATYANDRANATH BOSE...🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

For those who believe in God. Ask yourself this question - Who created God? There is no way that God himself cannot ask himself that question. What determined that he would be the beginning and end of everything? Think about it. And then after that, who created what created God? It's really deep like Michio Kaku said. I'm sticking with science. It has evidence that can be tested and seen. The End!

@IaChess

8 жыл бұрын

+Ezekiel Major Thats because we are so small like ours brain, thats the reason that we can not understand: How does God exist?

@ezekielmajor5511

8 жыл бұрын

Iachess, that is such a lame explanation. You must do better. Science has already discovered several things which negates bible text, so do not avoid my question with such tiny logic.

@IaChess

8 жыл бұрын

Ezekiel Major What Does the Bible Really Teach? www.jw.org/en/publications/books/bible-teach/

@jaswantairara

8 жыл бұрын

+Ezekiel Major: Please read with love :-) 1. it not lame and tiny, but its brave, courageous and intelligent acceptance... Pls understand that. 2. Well i don't think about GOD the way its projected normally world... 3. I don't regard science any higher.. Science is biggest glorified blind faith followed by humanity... it does not know anything, only hypothesis based on certain mid path repeatable observations... and one day external context changes and theory (gossip/science) falls flat... Its OK to have science as timepass, ego ride and for utilitarian purpose but nothing more... 4. Even if it can find the TRUTH it wont help. For example quantum mechanics clearly knows there is no matter in the world... just that waves exhibit a characteristic of particle when observed. Which means reality we see is a delusion, but this understanding has not improved internal experience of life for human's ... same hold true for everything else done baed on intellect, logic and thoughts... barely utilitarian.., 5. Its impossible to have it all started infinite years back... only possible answer to questions like you put (which otherwise take us to infinite regress) is it has to some thing beyond time, space and causality... where questions cease.. 6. Definitely our minds are missing some thing really seriously in terms of perception of truth... sceicne can at most give answer on paper but wont change the way mind perceives life, therefore absolutely of no use. 7. I am not saying God is there as its perceived, but its an energy field beyond time, space and causality and things are just playfully going in cycles without purpose. Thats brief of my current view about all this. Thx for reading. Bye.

@ezekielmajor5511

8 жыл бұрын

Everything you typed is an avoidance of the question - "Who created God; and what gave him the sole authority over mankind?" Dont avoid the question by typing exciting-sounding giberish.

She probably doesn't understand anything he says.

i hate when the person doesn't listen to the question that was asked. she asked, essentially, "what is higgs and what is boson," and the guy started talking about dumb shit.

So, what if that same type of crystal was made to explode again in the same universe? What if the higgs boson exploded in the very universe that the higgs boson made? Would it create a double universe? Or would it somehow cancel out?

Genesis chapter 0 verse -1

@BlockrealmMC124

10 жыл бұрын

lel

@Topofthetopapex

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Simple as that!

@jasonking3177

9 жыл бұрын

Malcolm Taylor Because A book written by men 2,000 years ago, when they didn't even know where the sun went at night has all the answer...... Makes sense

@nmarbletoe8210

9 жыл бұрын

Malcolm Taylor and the earth was without form, as the Higgs field had not yet condensed

@TheOnly1Zalo

9 жыл бұрын

Malcolm Taylor Fuck off

@rich1051414

9 жыл бұрын

Malcolm Taylor Get the fuck off the internet then. Go live in the woods. Pray to your god for internet.

@TheOnly1Zalo

8 жыл бұрын

***** k.

It's so extremly funny to watch the reporter trying to make it look like she is understanding everything Kaku says :D

Oh Kaku.....the Higgs Boson wasn’t “the spark” that led to the creation of the universe. That is absurd. It is simply an oscillation in the Higgs Field which when particles interact with it, get mass. What he is confusing it with is the Inflaton which is a hypothetical particle that made up the also hypothetical Inflaton field. I heard from many he made this blunder on CBS, but also in CNN? That’s quite disappointing.

GOD created the heavens and earth period.

@DasAntiNaziBroetchen

9 жыл бұрын

jloveinnc My ass created god. Disprove that. You can't. Bye.

@sureshbiswakarma5378

5 жыл бұрын

Why you think so?

How can these so called intelligent people make such asinine comments about fuse setting off explosions that created the universe? The precision and accuracy with which this universe is created does not suggest some haphazard bing bang explosion, it suggests that there is an ALL POWERFUL BEING, THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, who created this universe and all that is in it. JESUS IS LORD OF ALL!

@3aeren

9 жыл бұрын

Ronnie Mead Jesus created the universe? so the father and the holy spirit took a day off that day??? u say jesus is lord of ALL.... so he is not equal to the father and/or the holy spirit? fuck man the trinity is one mindfuck :)

@ronniemead805

9 жыл бұрын

Please take the time to read the bible, it will speak to your heart. Lots of people write off God without taking the time to read His Holy Words for themselves. Don't make that mistake, or you will regret it when you find yourself in a place you do not want to be. Jesus is Lord of All.

@3aeren

9 жыл бұрын

Ronnie Mead u didnt answer my questions ronnie. if u give me convincing answers ill convert on the spot

@duddwheeler297

9 жыл бұрын

Ronnie Mead Im going to go out on a limb and say you were raised around other Christians? True?

@ronniemead805

9 жыл бұрын

what's your point?

0:07 - 0:37 He described the experiment that two beams of proton slamming together by trillion volts of electron to produce an explosion, then there exist a Higgs Boson. So, without proton and electron, a Higgs Boson (smaller particle) does not exist. He explained that a Higgs Boson is the one that begins ALL subatomic explosions to make all atoms for mass in the universe. Atomic bombs are exploded by neutrons slamming into uranium nucleus and splitting it into smaller atoms. Begin - End.

i sincerely feel sorry for those type of people, they know what they are doing is being hated by everyone, yet their greediness compels them to continue

Please disprove god, i'd really like to see that XD

@TheWorldTeacher

4 жыл бұрын

Your wish is my command: 🐟 07. GOD (OR NOT): There has never been, nor will there ever be, even the slightest shred of evidence for the existence of the Godhead, that is, a Supreme Person or Deity, for the notion of an omnipresent PERSON is both profoundly illogical and extremely incongruous, to put it mildly. The English word “person” literally means “for sound”, originating from the Latin/Greek “persona/prósōpa”, referring to the masks worn by actors in ancient European theatrical plays, which featured a mouth hole to enable the actors to speak through. Theists, by definition, believe that there is a Supreme Deity which incorporates anthropomorphic characteristics such as corporeal form (even if that form is a “spiritual” body, whatever that may connote), with a face (hence the term “person”), and certain personality traits such as unique preferences and aversions. Simple logic dictates that the Ultimate Reality transcends all concepts, including personality and even impersonality. However, only an excruciatingly minute number of humans have ever grasped this complete understanding and realization. There are at least FOUR reasons why many persons are convinced of the existence of a Supreme Personal God: 1. Because it is natural for any sensible person to believe that humans may not be the pinnacle of existence, and that there must be a higher power or ultimate creative force (an intelligent designer). However, because they cannot conceive of this designer being non-personal, they automatically suspect it must be a man (God) or a woman (The Goddess) with personal attributes. One who is truly awakened and/or enlightened understands that the Universal Self is the creator of all experiences and that he IS that (“tat tvam asi”, in Sanskrit). 2. Because they have experienced some kind of mystical phenomenon or miracle, which they mistakenly attribute to “God's grace”, but which can be more logically explicated by another means. As explained, all such phenomena are produced by the TRUE Self of all selves (“Paramātman”, in Sanskrit). I, the author of this Holy Scripture, have personally experienced very powerful, miraculous, mystical phenomena, which I formerly ascribed to the personal conception of God (since I was a Theist), but now know to be caused, ultimately, by the Real Self. 3. Because they may have witnessed the deeds or read the words of an individual who seems to be a perfect person - in other words an incarnation of the Divine Principle (“Avatāra”, in Sanskrit). To be sure, such persons do exist, but that does not necessarily prove that the Supreme Truth is PERSONAL. An Avatar is a man who was born fully enlightened, with all noble qualities, but not necessarily perfect in every possible way. For example, very few (if any) of the recognized Avatars in human history taught or practiced veganism. 4. Because they have been CONDITIONED by their family, society and/or religious organization over many years or decades. Unfortunately, we humans are very gullible. Due to low intelligence and lack of critical analysis, the typical person believes almost anything they read or hear from virtually any source. During a visit to one's local place of worship on any given weekend, one will notice a congregation of sheepish individuals nodding in agreement with practically every nonsensical, inane word spouted by their deluded so-called “priest”, imam, mullah, rabbi, guru, monk, or preacher. Even the current World Teacher, despite his genius intellect, was once a thoroughly-indoctrinated religious fundamentalist, before he awoke to a definitive understanding of life. Having stated the above, the worship of the Personal Deity (“bhakti yoga”, in Sanskrit), is a legitimate spiritual path for the masses. However, the most ACCURATE understanding is monistic or non-dual (“advaita”, in Sanskrit). If one wishes to be even more pedantic, the ultimate understanding is beyond even the concept of nonduality, as the great South Indian sage, Śri Ramana Maharishi, once so rightly proclaimed. As an aside, it seems that practically every religious organization, particularly those originating in Bhārata (India), claims to have been founded by an Avatar, but that’s simply wishful thinking on the part of their congregations. Only a great sage or world teacher can POSSIBLY recognize an enlightened being, what to speak of an Incarnation of the Divine. The typical spiritual aspirant, even one who may seem to be a highly-exalted practitioner, has very little idea of what constitutes actual holiness. Frankly speaking, many famous (infamous?) religious leaders were some of the most vile and contemptible characters in human history, particularly in this Epoch of Darkness (“Kali Yuga”, in Sanskrit). “God is greater than God.” ************* “Where there is Isness, there God is. Creation is the giving of isness from God. That is why God becomes where any creature expresses God.” ************* “Theologians may quarrel, but the mystics of the world speak the same language.” ************* “There is something in the soul that is so akin to God that it is one with Him... It has nothing in common with anything created.” ************* “The knower and the known are one. Simple people imagine that they should see God as if he stood there and they here. This is not so. God and I, we are one in knowledge.” ************* “The eye through which I see God is the same eye through which God sees me; my eye and God's eye are one eye, one seeing, one knowing, one love.” Eckhart von Hochheim O.P. (AKA Meister Eckhart) , German Roman Catholic Priest. “God is merely one of man's concepts, a symbol used for pointing the way, to the Ultimate Reality, which has been mistaken for the Reality itself. The map has been mistaken for the actual territory.” ************* “Worshipers may derive some sort of satisfaction or peace of mind, through worship of a concept such as God (created by themselves), but it is a futile process, from the viewpoint of experiencing one's true nature.” Ramesh Balsekar, Indian Spiritual Teacher.

@henriettawillis2970

4 жыл бұрын

Good can't be disproved because it exist on the concept that God created everything. You have to prove that nothing exist to disprove God. Just let people believe what they want to believe.

@TheWorldTeacher

4 жыл бұрын

Henrietta Willis Sings: “It ain’t necessarily so...” 🎤

@Quwucuqin

2 жыл бұрын

It is necessary for stupid people who relay on god just let them worship

Everything didn't come from it. Why? Science is not God. All for Intelligibility not concreteness,

This video was uploaded wayback in 2012 wherein I was still in high school and I didn't know that youtube exist nit until I went to college in 2013.

I watch just about everything that Kaku puts out, and I must agree with you.

I am a Christian, and in some cases I would agree with you. I would say that many many religious people, especially Americans more than others, refuse to try to understand science. Most of the time when given evidence that contradicts their beliefs, they just say your wrong, your going to hell, etc. etc. BUT there are many Christians out there beginning to understand science and how it actually helps religion. Apologists like Ravi Zacharias, Os Guinness, and multiple others.

I love it when a smart person tells a non smart person about things they have a hard time comprehending. Then proceed to bring up the only point they are interested and understand out of the whole thing and continue to be stuck on that one train of thought.

That being said, I'm not sure of two things: 1. How your reply is relevant to my initial comment (although I'm enjoying the discussion all the same): I was simply saying that scientists did not choose the word "god" for their science, and it was the media who did it in this case. 2. How science is flawed; our current theories may be flawed, but science - unlike religion - is self-correcting as more knowledge is acquired. Religion, on the other hand, is stubbornly self-preserving.

It's the field generating inside a blackhole that allows time to happen

Why do people think that there can only be a God as long as we don't understand the physical properties of the universe? It's like saying because you understand how paint molecules work, there is no Mona Lisa. I believe in God and love science. I have seen crippled bones straighten out when people prayed, and I have thrilled at books about the Higgs Boson since the 90s. The universe is a big place. Neither scientists nor theologians have the complete story.

Peter Higgs, while an atheist, does not believe his discovery disproves God or religion. He stated that science and faith can co-exist, and that a lot of his colleagues are believers. Scientists never meant for the Higgs Boson to be the answer or contradiction to God.

Michio Kaku explains that VERY IN DEPTH in this one video I saw.

I love the way Kaku rarely talks about religion. He brushes it off so quickly here. I honestly don't think he cares for arguing over religion at all. He's here to talk about science, metaphysics isn't part of the deal.

I agree with you, I myself hate accepting something without questioning.

In order to truly understand the world, a true observer must have an open mind. “I'd rather be an optimist and a fool than a pessimist and right.” -Prof. Albert Einstein

9 years later and still no real advancement in that question ?

Yeah, and I think the answer to that question is that, this thing that we call a "Self" or "I" IS the Universe. More precisely, this thing we call a "Self" is the central point in which all information in the universe is processed. In other words the ENTIRE Universe experiences itself through YOU, through other humans, through other organisms, animals, microbes, plants etc.. from all these different perspectives Simultaneously in a never ending cycle of birth and death.

"E2=mc2c4+p2c2 like dropping pebbles into a pond dividing a unit of space/ multiplied by one unit of time. The greater the mass/energy density inward spherical boson waves generating heat by multiplying electrical potential along cubic dynameters compressing the wave amplitude now+4-0-4+-the shorter the expanding transverse waves dividing gravity from its source. Energy compression pi +1=mass.de-compressing C2 forming acceleration-G from zero curvature, wave front by wave front as time unfolds."

THAT what should be on the news channels more!

The split moment of creation itself revealed... *Insert Mind blowing explosion noise*

Probably, we are just starting to understand, what happens around us! These words make me shiver!

I really like Kaku, but I often wonder if scientists just grab their forehead when he is the one explaining things

What I got from his explanation is that we have found the particle that creates universes. What I got from this is CERN could be creating universes in that collider. I highly doubt they are as huge in mass as ours, but yeah. Not sure where the parallel dimensions theory comes into play in this...

Crsohr is right. It's not an explosion and it's not "expanding away form its center." Like he said, it's an expansion of space itself, such that every point in the universe sees the expansion in the same way, which would not be so if it were expanding from some "center." Neither him nor I are saying the big bang theory is incorrect, just correcting a phrase that often leads to misunderstandings about what the big bang theory is.

they seem to be the end of building blocks as some particles like Electron do not occupy any space. It's higgs bosson that gives mass to every thing.

The anchor had no idea what Michio Kaku was talking about until he said that Elvis may be alive in a parallel universe

Accepted. And I apologize as well for my sarcasm. We may have different perspectives, but we are both wanting answers to the same thing. Believe me, I enjoy learning science, especially physics and mathematics.

whait a minute,so higgs boson its a hole in to other dimesion?the colision of two protons shows this particule,so this particule are the glue for the mater but thers the mass come from there?sorry for the dumb question but this is realy interestyng

Yes, I personally do. What do you compare decaying rates of nuclides to? In order to come up with an accurate date, you would have to know which rocks were at each stage of decay directly after an explosion of the big bang, and I don't believe that you truly know that. You can guess, but not know. Where did the energy for the big bang come from?

Casey halelton your a clever one .....thank you that was very intresting

Michio Kaku gave a confusing explanation/description here, hence your rather inacurate post. eV, or electronvolt, is just a unit of measurement for energy (it means that it is a high energy event). Why do we do that ? Because Higgs is a massive boson and you need a lot of E to produce one (E=mc^2). Protons and electrons are tiny in comparison : e = 0,511 MeV/c^2 p = 938,272 MeV/c^2 H = between 125,0 and 126,0 GeV/c^2 (notice the Giga there) In atomic bombs, mass is converted into E.

I love the news readers expression haha. She's thinking wtf.

That was really found by the Indian scientist 'satyandra nath bose'

Higgs Boson is named after #Bengali scientist #SatyandraNathBose .must given #NobelPrize #Holiday for #SatyandraNathBose birthday. #He is really #God #Godaparticle

"It was always there? and what evidence do you have that energy was not created?" It is a well known FACT and even stated by Albert Einstien himself that "Energy CANNOT be created or destroyed, only changed from one form to another." (which is all energy really does). So if it can't be CREATED, well then logically it had to of always been there, otherwise it wouldn't exist. Now, what evidence do YOU have that it WAS created? And by what? What created THAT?

Ok, where did I disagree with the big bang in my comment? I'm saying that referring to it as an 'explosion' is misleading. It isn't blowing out from some centre. It is expanding at every point in space simultaneously. There is no 'centre'. Everywhere is the centre. Think about the surface of an expanding sphere, where is the centre of the surface? Either nowhere or everywhere depending on how you see it. Don't be so quick to attack on youtube, friend.

Whether or not religion is logically valid is personal opinion, and very conversational at that.

She asked what the implications for "religion" might be, not specifically about the existence of gods, which is only one aspect of only some religions. Disproving certain religions' creation stories, and even disproving certain 'Creator God' stories, is not the same as disproving the existence of gods in general, so there's no reason to assume she had that on her mind just because she said 'religion'. "Implications for religion" do not begin and end with the existence of god, there's far more.

1:00 - 1:08 Micho Kaku said "you me even love" Nikola Tesla said "if you want to to find the secrets of the universe think in terms of energy frequency and vibration" 528 is the love frequency. If God is love, don't you think they would be somehow connected?

so basically this higgs boson is a particle that gives other particles mass. does the higgs boson itself have mass?

I'm not sure if you bothered reading my post, but like I said, the Higgs Boson has nothing to do with god any more than any other particle, and thus calling it the god particle is a misnomer. This name was given by publishers and not by scientists. From the National Post: "Lederman, who over the years has been the target of much opprobrium from his scientific colleagues, tells friends he wanted to call the book “The Goddamned Particle” to reflect frustration at the failure to find it."

If I am perfect, and a table (that I built) chooses not to work for me, I will destroy the table and remake it.

is there a way to measure a rock's age without measuring time? Your "independent ways" measure a rock's decay, and then they assume the the rock's decay remained constant for 4.5 billion years. It is impossible to say that anything has remained constant for 4.5 billion years.

Disprove religion!? Uh, I don’t think so hunny. A creator exists and you are only observing His works. This only proves how amazing God is. Get that straight.

Not quite. Even when two beams of protons are smashed together, a Higgs Boson does not actually exist in the collision. The Higgs has not been recreated, but rather in these experiments the pattern of particles produced shows evidence that supports the Higgs Boson's existence. If the Higgs was actually created in these experiments, then it would have been discovered decades ago.