What did Wilhelm II Think of Hitler?

By becoming a KZread Member, you will immensely help our production, and you will get exclusive details: / @knowledgia
You can also support us on Patreon: / knowledgia . Thank you so much for watching, and for your constant support and consideration!
♦Please consider to SUBSCRIBE: goo.gl/YJNqek
♦Our general knowledge channel: / @masteringknowledge
♦Music by Epidemic Sound
#History #Documentary

Пікірлер: 941

  • @emilb6439
    @emilb643929 күн бұрын

    You're missing the entire quote on Wilhelm being ashamed of being German, the quote being: For the first time, I am ashamed to be a German. There's a man alone, without family, without children, without God ... He [Hitler] builds legions, but he doesn't build a nation.

  • @connorzimdahl6305

    @connorzimdahl6305

    28 күн бұрын

    Es wäre schön, hätte er das angesprochen.

  • @oolooo

    @oolooo

    28 күн бұрын

    Based quote

  • @connorhaley3190

    @connorhaley3190

    26 күн бұрын

    He mentioned it in the main video

  • @ATOQ777

    @ATOQ777

    25 күн бұрын

    "he doesn't build a nation" He did build one, destroyed it too

  • @davidturner7513

    @davidturner7513

    25 күн бұрын

    Literaly makes no fkin difference

  • @OptimusNero
    @OptimusNeroАй бұрын

    How lucky Wilhem II was to pass away before the end of the War. Imagine what he would have said if he saw Germany being officially divided in two nations, one of them controlled by a communist Russia

  • @somerandomchillpotato1991

    @somerandomchillpotato1991

    Ай бұрын

    And the other one covertly keeping the Nazis in charge

  • @slainer5748

    @slainer5748

    Ай бұрын

    He would literally be depressed if he lives to see this.

  • @funnytrialman3112

    @funnytrialman3112

    Ай бұрын

    Yeah,he created communist Russia himself with his actions

  • @curt8652

    @curt8652

    Ай бұрын

    Divided, it would be like his childhood

  • @rezaganjizadeh4263

    @rezaganjizadeh4263

    Ай бұрын

    he would have a stroke

  • @OskarSricson
    @OskarSricsonАй бұрын

    Wilhem was no saint, but I HATE how some productions, even German ones, portray him as someone as caricaturally evil as the Austrian painter. Wilhem was as responsible for the First World War as the other countries that participated in it, not to mention he tried at first to avoid the war

  • @blacktaler

    @blacktaler

    Ай бұрын

    World war one would begin anyways. Because alliance of france, britain and russia wanted to be the most powerful in the world so they began the first ww. Not the germany or its allies.

  • @bonzoluv

    @bonzoluv

    Ай бұрын

    You could say the same about Churchill considering his endless insistence on not accepting any peace treaty. Even the ones that included a Polish state

  • @DarthDread-oh2ne

    @DarthDread-oh2ne

    Ай бұрын

    World War would have been started with or without Wilhelm. I forgot the channel’s name but there was this guy who went into detail on how the Kaiser was innocent.

  • @bu9901

    @bu9901

    Ай бұрын

    You are right but WW1 would have happened without Wilhelm.

  • @brymaster6896

    @brymaster6896

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@DarthDread-oh2nelavader

  • @dumpstermaster104
    @dumpstermaster104Ай бұрын

    Comparing Wilhelm to Hitler is like comparing Sqidward to Sauron 😂😂😂

  • @BellBeakerBloke

    @BellBeakerBloke

    27 күн бұрын

    The Austrian was a national hero. The fact you call him Sauron shows how laughable the programming is

  • @Elgiothegreat

    @Elgiothegreat

    27 күн бұрын

    @@BellBeakerBlokeas you said was, now he is very frowned upon

  • @starcatcherksp1517

    @starcatcherksp1517

    26 күн бұрын

    "National hero" Even if he won the war he would be a hero only to the germans. I guess the Poles and Slavs and Jews are "programmed" into not accepting their Aryan masters. ​@BellBeakerBloke

  • @igorlopes7589

    @igorlopes7589

    25 күн бұрын

    ​@@BellBeakerBloke A man without family, without children, without God, he built legions but not a Nation and made Willerm freaking Hohenzolern ashamed to be german. A genocidal dictator is what he was

  • @prestonjones1653

    @prestonjones1653

    24 күн бұрын

    ​@@BellBeakerBloke Last I checked, heroes aren't losers.

  • @alexzois
    @alexzoisАй бұрын

    Wilhelm is still to this day not buried he is in his home in the netherlands in a small house in his backyard and if you peak from the windows yu can see his coffin with the german imperial war flag on the coffin as he said that he will only be buried when his family retake the throne of Germany and the kaisers return

  • @connorzimdahl6305

    @connorzimdahl6305

    28 күн бұрын

  • @nandinhocunha440

    @nandinhocunha440

    27 күн бұрын

    Yeah, the guys said he was buried in the Netherlands. That's not true. He died there

  • @karhonglooi7485

    @karhonglooi7485

    27 күн бұрын

    A pity that his body would never be returned to his fatherland then, given that modern Germany would probably not want a Kaiser again

  • @wingslider

    @wingslider

    25 күн бұрын

    @@nandinhocunha440i think he is still buried there as hitler didn’t want the body returned as it could make the monarchists go into support for him and revolt

  • @nandinhocunha440

    @nandinhocunha440

    25 күн бұрын

    @@wingslider wait, I thought Hitler did want the body to be buried in N. Germany and his last wish was to be buried in Monarch Germany

  • @OptimusNero
    @OptimusNeroАй бұрын

    I bet Wilhelm, despite his sad end, was grateful to God. Unlike his cousin Nicky, his enemies were content with him simply going into exile.

  • @Donut-fr7is

    @Donut-fr7is

    Ай бұрын

    Well... The British weren't really okay with him going into exile. They wanted to take him to court but Wilhelmina protected Wilhelm so they never got hold of him.

  • @OptimusNero

    @OptimusNero

    Ай бұрын

    @@Donut-fr7is He could have ended like Trotsky

  • @Donut-fr7is

    @Donut-fr7is

    Ай бұрын

    @@OptimusNero I honestly think the only reason that didn't happen is because Old George didn't want to kill his cousin Willy. Bertie and Edward probably couldn't care less about Willy anyway.

  • @biteof78

    @biteof78

    24 күн бұрын

    lol Lenin was livid when he heard that the Romanovs were murdered, they were hostages for a reason

  • @jamesdavis9036

    @jamesdavis9036

    24 күн бұрын

    @@biteof78 Source?

  • @user-pb7ch5kl8x
    @user-pb7ch5kl8xАй бұрын

    Keep in mind that by that time the concentration camps were still unknown and if Wilhelm was disgusted by the racist policies of the Reich then, one can only imagine how devastated and angry he would have been at the fact that millions of Jewish citizens of Germany were physically exterminated. Wilhelm himself was a little anti-Semitic, but this never turned into a coherent state policy - he simply did not like Jews, but recognized their right to live in Germany and respected their contribution to the development of the country.

  • @timurthejerk9270

    @timurthejerk9270

    Ай бұрын

    Well that’s kinda understandable, many people irrationally dislike a certain group of people because of environmental and cultural factors. One should really only care about whether they are treated as equally as others, as in they aren’t targeted for they’re intrinsic race,

  • @Willy_Tepes

    @Willy_Tepes

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@timurthejerk9270 They had reasons and they were legitimate concerns. We are not allowed to speak about those reasons. That should be a red flag for any thinking person..

  • @timurthejerk9270

    @timurthejerk9270

    Ай бұрын

    @@Willy_Tepes sure, but I’m just saying whether he had valid reasons or not. If the German state treated them fairly then it wouldn’t matter if his hatred for them was irrational or based. If the Germans treated their Jewish citizens like citizens, whether Wilhelm hated them or not is largely irrelevant

  • @Willy_Tepes

    @Willy_Tepes

    Ай бұрын

    @@timurthejerk9270 That was not an option, the problem was too serious and systemic. They were not treated unfairly. As I said I cannot mention the reasons, but they have today become global.

  • @Willy_Tepes

    @Willy_Tepes

    Ай бұрын

    @@timurthejerk9270 These valid reasons included some of the worst crimes you can imagine, and they acted as a group. They were treated fairly. The truth is not that hard to find.

  • @OptimusNero
    @OptimusNeroАй бұрын

    I really reccomend the movie "the Exception", about Wilhem II's relationship with the third Reich during his last years of life. Christopher Plummer makes an amazing job humanizing the character

  • @phamhuu1519

    @phamhuu1519

    27 күн бұрын

    I just watched it! Which is why I clicked on this short! That movie was so sweet

  • @anderson._.._.8801

    @anderson._.._.8801

    25 күн бұрын

    Where can you watch it?

  • @Lord_Khan

    @Lord_Khan

    23 күн бұрын

    That movie's plot is fictional, keep that in mind

  • @goncalonunes3203
    @goncalonunes3203Ай бұрын

    "For the first time, i am ashamed to be german" - Wilhem II, 1939

  • @user-gi8pk9uc7q

    @user-gi8pk9uc7q

    28 күн бұрын

    Well, look at that, the kaiser has a heart after all!

  • @davenewsom5985

    @davenewsom5985

    14 күн бұрын

    I honestly feel the same way when it comes to American White Supremacists and Dummy Trump. 2 of those make me ashamed to be both White & American.

  • @oLii96x

    @oLii96x

    9 күн бұрын

    The quote is fake...

  • @goncalonunes3203

    @goncalonunes3203

    9 күн бұрын

    @@oLii96x "Wilhelm was also appalled at the Kristallnacht of 9-10 November 1938, saying: “For the first time, I am ashamed to be a German.” - University of literature, science and arts of michigan

  • @oLii96x

    @oLii96x

    9 күн бұрын

    @@goncalonunes3203 That quote is fake...

  • @martintinajero9140
    @martintinajero9140Ай бұрын

    Despite Wilhem flaws and mistakes, he was more human than Hitler and he was right to be disgusted with Hitler and everything he stood for.

  • @Willy_Tepes

    @Willy_Tepes

    Ай бұрын

    The descriptions from people who knew him paint a different picture.

  • @TheRatOnFire_

    @TheRatOnFire_

    25 күн бұрын

    ​@mrsteamer Bro the TDS is insane, do you guys get off on calling him Hitler or something, he's at most a rude jackass, not a genocidal maniac. Obama's admin led to more deaths than Trump's

  • @Nickers19

    @Nickers19

    24 күн бұрын

    ​@@Willy_Tepes and what is it?

  • @Willy_Tepes

    @Willy_Tepes

    23 күн бұрын

    @@Nickers19 And you actually think I can say the truth on a platform like this? Who owns YT? Censorship is going to fail, and then all hell will break lose..

  • @MisterPeckingOrder

    @MisterPeckingOrder

    21 күн бұрын

    @@Willy_TepesThe majority of historic N@zis all either ended up tortured in prison, executed, or took themselves out. Only the very best of their scientists managed to survive by becoming servile to the nations that they tried to destroy. What makes you think it’s going to work out any different next time around

  • @OskarSricson
    @OskarSricsonАй бұрын

    And all of this happened just because Wilhem fired Bismarck. What an oopsie, Willie. What an oopsie

  • @matthewdavid6134

    @matthewdavid6134

    Ай бұрын

    To be fair Bismarck wasn’t perfect he made a lot of mistakes, and basically set up flawed system, also Wille didn’t fire Bismarck, he tendered his resignation and Wille accepted it, Bismarck was bluffing and Wille called his bluff so both their faults really.

  • @Sceptonic

    @Sceptonic

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@matthewdavid6134thanks for setting the record straight

  • @matthewdavid6134

    @matthewdavid6134

    Ай бұрын

    @@Sceptonic Np

  • @user-pb7ch5kl8x

    @user-pb7ch5kl8x

    Ай бұрын

    Bismarck was already old. You can't built nation that relay only on the sholders of one person.

  • @maddenstutts2953

    @maddenstutts2953

    Ай бұрын

    Bismarck was terrible at domestic policy, but great at foreign policy which Wilhelm recognized. Wilhelm wanted to make him in charge of foreign policy alone but Bismarck refused.

  • @melonking9752
    @melonking97529 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm II was one of the biggest actors in WW1 but he wasn't a monster like Hitler.

  • @Felipe_XIV-XVI
    @Felipe_XIV-XVI26 күн бұрын

    Respect for Wilhelm skyrocketed immensely, although I already knew this, hearing it again is refreshing. Wilhelm evoked the traditional preußisch medieval knighthood, while Hitler evokes pure raw machinery.

  • @Willy_Tepes

    @Willy_Tepes

    25 күн бұрын

    The artist won over the monarch. Reason won over politics.

  • @prestonjones1653

    @prestonjones1653

    24 күн бұрын

    ​@@Willy_Tepes And he finally made a good painting at the end. A lot of red.

  • @ForTheBrotherhood

    @ForTheBrotherhood

    24 күн бұрын

    ​@@prestonjones1653His best painting were the perfect Germany he drew in his speeches)

  • @Felipe_XIV-XVI

    @Felipe_XIV-XVI

    23 күн бұрын

    @emilemasbou7950, that can be debated, as such humiliation came after Serbian nationals literally murdered the Prince Heir. WW1 is unlike WW2, in WW1 there are no good guys.

  • @ForTheBrotherhood

    @ForTheBrotherhood

    20 күн бұрын

    @@Felipe_XIV-XVI Yes. And also, in WW1, there are a lot of people to lay the blame on. Serbia for assasinating Franz Ferdinand, A-H E for sending a close to impossible ultimatium, Russia for increasing the small conflict in scale, or Germany for supporting A-H E

  • @tundrawolf5127
    @tundrawolf5127Ай бұрын

    Weird how you portray wilhelm with 2 functional arms

  • @Donut-fr7is

    @Donut-fr7is

    Ай бұрын

    Sssh, don't let the Kaiser hear 'ya.

  • @Kliver13

    @Kliver13

    24 күн бұрын

    he had a functional arm its just his left arm was shorter then right one and guess what is in the video ?

  • @Donut-fr7is

    @Donut-fr7is

    22 күн бұрын

    @emilemasbou7950 Willy-Nicky telgraphs. Wilhelm was seeking appeasement. It seems you were fed some propaganda.

  • @Donut-fr7is

    @Donut-fr7is

    22 күн бұрын

    @emilemasbou7950 Not sure if you are aware, but Germany had a parliament and a civilian government. Wilhelm wasn't present for much of the crisis. He was in vacation, cruising around Norway with his ship. When he came back, the civilian government had already made terrible decisions. He immediately tried personal diplomacy, as seen in the Willy-Nicky telegrams. The telegrams were partially successful. Russian mobilization was halted, but later resumed due to pressure put on Nicholas by his advisors.

  • @Donut-fr7is

    @Donut-fr7is

    22 күн бұрын

    @emilemasbou7950 The blank cheque was given after the Russians forged an alliance with Serbia and Romania with the intention of carving the Empire up. While Wilhelm did urge the Austrians to not let the crisis drag out and take action against Serbia, hoping to put and end to the crisis before Russia got involved, the blank cheque WAS NOT given by Wilhelm. It was given by von Falkenhayn to the Count of Hoyos, the Austrian Ambassador. The German ambassador to London urged cooperation to resolve the crisis through the negotiation table a day later. It is false that Wilhelm dictated the foreign policy of Germany entirely.

  • @deadchannelxd4910
    @deadchannelxd491022 күн бұрын

    He was originally pro nazis till the nazis said they werent interest in restoring the monarchy

  • @PanAugusto83

    @PanAugusto83

    21 күн бұрын

    True

  • @rarescevei8268

    @rarescevei8268

    20 күн бұрын

    You also forgot to mention they just came to power and didnt implement any racial laws, or any actual social laws at all, just some economic reforms.

  • @domsjuk

    @domsjuk

    13 күн бұрын

    ​@@rarescevei8268What tf are you talking about? It only took a literal month with the "Reichstagsbrandverordnung" to start political purges and limiting civil rights, two months to neutralize parliament And the president, and within half a year they banned all other parties, unions or e.g. could pick and sack civil servants (Jews, socialists, etc.) as they liked. The Nuremberg (Racial) Laws came in 1935...

  • @lb8686
    @lb868628 күн бұрын

    I'm no expert of history but I don't get why Wilhelm II & Germany are pointed out as "bad guys" and having the biggest cause of the war. Isn't WW1 a game of power and the winners writes whatever history they want?

  • @Eimermann4613

    @Eimermann4613

    27 күн бұрын

    Exactly

  • @BMO_alreadytaken

    @BMO_alreadytaken

    27 күн бұрын

    Because he caused a minor regional conflict into a world war

  • @NewBeginning78

    @NewBeginning78

    26 күн бұрын

    ​@@BMO_alreadytakenRussia mobilized its forces to support their Slavic brethren in Serbia, preparing for a potential conflict with Austria-Hungary. Germany asked Russia to halt the mobilization, viewing it as a threat. The Tsar did not comply, and only after Russia refused to demobilize did Wilhelm declare war on Russia.

  • @BMO_alreadytaken

    @BMO_alreadytaken

    26 күн бұрын

    @@NewBeginning78 this starting ww1 so in conclusion Germany started it

  • @LeonDS17414

    @LeonDS17414

    26 күн бұрын

    ​@@BMO_alreadytakenaustria and Russia started it, Russia just wanted more influence in the Balkans and Austria declared war first

  • @napoleonhasswag1338
    @napoleonhasswag1338Ай бұрын

    That’s my Kaiser ✌️

  • @Tomszpl

    @Tomszpl

    Ай бұрын

    Very bad kaiser

  • @palastofhistory4026

    @palastofhistory4026

    26 күн бұрын

    @@Tomszpl not really he was actually a very good kaiser Had he did much for the everyday German and he tried to befriend other nations even if those nations kept disrespecting and hating him and his country (France, Britain)

  • @Tomszpl

    @Tomszpl

    26 күн бұрын

    @@palastofhistory4026 no there was german fault in having enemies between literally most of powers

  • @mongo4525

    @mongo4525

    26 күн бұрын

    @@Tomszplwhat are you yappin about? Stop lying

  • @dorito3366
    @dorito3366Ай бұрын

    Wilhelm was an erratic irresponsible man, however under my view in my passion towards Austrian history, He didn’t start WW1. No one did. WW1 was the result of a pot which had been on the stove for a century boiling over, ww1 could have fought and began by any power. The fashoda incident could have started ww1 for example, or the great game or even some years earlier in the agadir crisis. Wilhelm was no saint, but he is overly judged.

  • @ibraheemshuaib8954

    @ibraheemshuaib8954

    Ай бұрын

    Should also note he didn't want the war to happen and was even good friends with the Russian Tsar, and a lot of his brashness and dislike for the British stems from the fact that a British doctor botched his birth and gave him a paralysed arm, and his British mother didn't love him. He wasn't a great guy, but just like any human he was built by the circumstances of life.

  • @boitshepomaile4472

    @boitshepomaile4472

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@ibraheemshuaib8954 He was actually a cousin of the Russian Tsar

  • @ibraheemshuaib8954

    @ibraheemshuaib8954

    Ай бұрын

    @@boitshepomaile4472 yep

  • @aia5524

    @aia5524

    Ай бұрын

    ​​@@boitshepomaile4472 And cousin with a French leader

  • @elbryn1

    @elbryn1

    Ай бұрын

    The ewws did.

  • @bosscakethememegod2581
    @bosscakethememegod258118 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm, also only commended Hitler's military in hopes that Hitler would put him or his son back on the German throne... when it became obvious he wouldn't he condemned Hitler, that's one thing about Kaiser Wilhelm, he drastically wanted to be back on the throne of Germany even going as far as to put in his will that he wouldn't be buried unless he's buried in Berlin and the House of Hohenzollern was back on the German Throne... which was respected you can go see his casket in his old manor with a Prussian flag draped over it waiting for Germany to return to a Monarchy

  • @maxschreck4095
    @maxschreck4095Ай бұрын

    Thats a more positive view of Wilhelm than I am familiar with...

  • @zeljkokaradzic7894

    @zeljkokaradzic7894

    24 күн бұрын

    What do you mean?

  • @maxschreck4095

    @maxschreck4095

    23 күн бұрын

    @emilemasbou7950 I would have agreed not too long ago, but I´ve heard people claiming other nations, like Russia and Great Britain, were just as agressive. Seeing how irresponsible they behaved these days, with Brexit and worse, the war on Ukraine, I can´t disagree.

  • @Tuscaria

    @Tuscaria

    22 күн бұрын

    @emilemasbou7950 wilhelm was literally chosen by god so i think the uniforms are justified.

  • @r.t.5767

    @r.t.5767

    Күн бұрын

    ​@@maxschreck4095 How can you compare a war to brexit? And why was brexit irresponsible? And how these events relate to World War I?

  • @maxschreck4095

    @maxschreck4095

    Күн бұрын

    @@r.t.5767 Because all of these were stupid, miscalculated policies that made the world a worse place to be.

  • @ForTheBrotherhood
    @ForTheBrotherhood24 күн бұрын

    Well, the starting point of Wilhelm's dislike for Hitler would be that Hitler was a socialist. Abd Wilhelm was a noble. It was simply impossible for them to get along.

  • @joemiller947

    @joemiller947

    22 күн бұрын

    Hitler wasn't really a socialist though, he just used that word to his advantage and his movement had nothing to do with Marxian socialism.

  • @marcsigmundson8337

    @marcsigmundson8337

    21 күн бұрын

    ​@@joemiller947 He was a socialist, but in a different way. If you take all bad things that happened aside and just look, what the actual national socialism was about, then you see that nationalism can't exist without socialism. That's also why the left and right has similarities in some ideas, but become different in how to do it.

  • @flyingsquirrell6953

    @flyingsquirrell6953

    21 күн бұрын

    @@marcsigmundson8337I gotta say this a thousand times: “socialists practice their programs out of ideals, Nazis practice socialist programs to further the war effort.”

  • @marcsigmundson8337

    @marcsigmundson8337

    21 күн бұрын

    @@flyingsquirrell6953 Which is not completely true, because even Hitler actually didn't want the war. It's not correct to just see the bad side, that happend during some situations. If everyone would do it, then nobody would do anything because every form of socialism failed and had blood on their hands.

  • @joemiller947

    @joemiller947

    21 күн бұрын

    @@marcsigmundson8337 Nothing Hitler did was modeled after Marx or his theories. That's not socialism

  • @mylesmulenga-uz6gd
    @mylesmulenga-uz6gd24 күн бұрын

    Nah he was just angry because he was nolonger kaiser and the German empire disappeared under his watch.

  • @Newdivide
    @NewdivideКүн бұрын

    It is noted that Wilhelm thought the Nazis will help him restore his throne, but as mentioned here, Hitler hated him & plans for the restoration never happened. The reason why Hitler hated Wilhelm was not because of Germany losing WWI was because he felt he shouldn't have surrendered under any circumstances After he died, Hitler respected Wihelm's wishes not to be buried back in Germany & left his burial site intact. Plus Wilhelm also wrote in his will that we would accept burial in Germany after the monarchy was restored

  • @MeisterBrynjolf
    @MeisterBrynjolf21 күн бұрын

    Had Wilhelm learned anything from Bismarck, there would have been no Hitler

  • @tencosiezastanawiap2992
    @tencosiezastanawiap299223 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm II: I was better than you lil bro Hitler: Oh yeah? TRY ME. *Conquers most of the europe* Wilhelm II: Ugh fine, imma die. *Dies in 1941* Hitler: Thank, God. Okay guys, you can stop acting our victories. Time to lose this war.

  • @zeusapollo6504

    @zeusapollo6504

    23 күн бұрын

    LOL

  • @catotheyounger2689
    @catotheyounger268927 күн бұрын

    Sad how ignorant of history people in the comments are. Wilhelm II was no saint, but he was also no worse than the other leaders of Europe. Every country was antisemitic, not just Germany. Before WWI, the German Empire was leading the world in technology, and science, and military power. Germans were also a very religious people, something I admire about them. The end of WWI gave way to extremism that has changed our world for the worse. If anyone is to be blamed for the problems of today, blame the Entente powers.

  • @BMO_alreadytaken

    @BMO_alreadytaken

    27 күн бұрын

    The cope

  • @ForTheBrotherhood

    @ForTheBrotherhood

    24 күн бұрын

    Yep. The direct reason for WW2 were the Bulgarian disarmament, Trianon, Versailles and Austria bring clear of all charges. If Austria rightfully had the harshest treaty, WW2 could've been avoided. And also, no Hitler, as germans wouldn't see the reason for him.

  • @rarescevei8268

    @rarescevei8268

    20 күн бұрын

    Germany was also the most progressive of its neighbours.

  • @catotheyounger2689

    @catotheyounger2689

    20 күн бұрын

    @@rarescevei8268 absolutely. Gradually Germany and the rest of Europe would become more free and liberal states. Assuming Germany was able to defeat France in the First Battle of the Marne, Russia would not have become communist either.

  • @Wiksteve

    @Wiksteve

    19 күн бұрын

    But what about the West? Would the defeat of France and Britain bring the radicalism back to them? We can never say if x won then it would be better, we do not have the foresight.​@@catotheyounger2689

  • @dextercochran4916
    @dextercochran491625 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm II refused to be buried in Germany UNLESS the monarchy there were one day restored. He's still buried in the Netherlands.

  • @DT-wp4hk
    @DT-wp4hkАй бұрын

    Adolf wrote why a certain type of nobilty no longer was desired😂

  • @TicketMaster117

    @TicketMaster117

    Ай бұрын

    Can you elaborate more on this because I’m genuinely interested

  • @squidthesquid1233

    @squidthesquid1233

    Ай бұрын

    @@TicketMaster117Jews.

  • @prestonjones1653

    @prestonjones1653

    24 күн бұрын

    And considering how "well" his little experiment went, the painter did more to further the momarchist cause than anyone before or since.

  • @DT-wp4hk

    @DT-wp4hk

    24 күн бұрын

    @@prestonjones1653 Because the bolsjewics send the tsar into the other world.

  • @Cjnw

    @Cjnw

    3 күн бұрын

    Hitler would have wanted Gretl Braun's descendants be the new German Royal Family.

  • @albertoamoruso7711
    @albertoamoruso771118 күн бұрын

    His outrage against Hitler's antisemitism is hilarious considering that all the government under Wilhelm were also incredibly antisemitic

  • @jamesseaman2950

    @jamesseaman2950

    Сағат бұрын

    Germany was not unique in that respect. The you-know-who have been kicked out of every country in Europe, sometimes more than once.

  • @PanAugusto83
    @PanAugusto8321 күн бұрын

    Not really, Wilhelm had hope in Hitler for some time, baceuse he expected for him to restore the monarchy.

  • @TheAustrianPainter1488
    @TheAustrianPainter148818 күн бұрын

    He started to like him around the middle of the war. Wilhelm was definitely not above antisemitism

  • @Le_Senat
    @Le_Senat29 күн бұрын

    Actually no, At the first stages of Nasis, wilhelm believed that htler will restore the german empire he would be throned again but it didnt happened becauae actually htler was the one who hated or despised wilhelm. As a ww1 veteran, htler saw him as a failure. Wilhelm sent two congrutulation letter to hitler after invasion of netherlands and france but htler ignored this 2 letters. Yes he was critical on policies and attrocities against jews but this critics wasnt that big like in video said and he also stunned by rapid advance of nasi germany and congrutulated htler

  • @connorzimdahl6305

    @connorzimdahl6305

    28 күн бұрын

    Well that is right but Wilhelm didnt like the whole build up upon the nasis think and ideology. Yes he didnt like the jews but they were GERMAN so he lived for the reich and the germans in it. (Please correct me if I am wrong)

  • @user-gi8pk9uc7q

    @user-gi8pk9uc7q

    28 күн бұрын

    Hitler would have never allowed the Kaiser to reclaim his throne, he wanted all the power for himself!

  • @Mr33500

    @Mr33500

    22 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm 2 never liked the nazis even from the start. He believed it was a necessary illness before monarchy and sanity was restored, but he quickly grew out of it after the nazis murdered important monarchists and it became clear Hitler never intended to restore the monarchy. The two letters he sent was purely focused on the victories in the battle of France and the German army.

  • @4thtime910

    @4thtime910

    20 күн бұрын

    This is not tiktok. You don't need to censor the bad words

  • @markjustinadambantaculo3296
    @markjustinadambantaculo3296Ай бұрын

    Wilhelm II looks like the KFC man. No wonder why he cooked during WWI 🔥🔥 Rest in Peace Kaiser 🕊️

  • @user-ky3ef5xq8m

    @user-ky3ef5xq8m

    27 күн бұрын

    W edit

  • @maou--sama
    @maou--sama26 күн бұрын

    a corporal of his army ruling his country

  • @bvillafuerte765
    @bvillafuerte7657 сағат бұрын

    Willheim was too optimistic to expect sanity from someone he sent to the slaughterhouse.

  • @lacerda6804
    @lacerda680418 күн бұрын

    Kinda messed up to leave out the whole part where he was sympathetic to nazism at its starts and Wilhelm's virulent anti-semitism

  • @hellheaven-dy2bz
    @hellheaven-dy2bz26 күн бұрын

    Man must have been depressed to see the destruction of his empire.He should have been proud to see his soldier conquer europe though. You know who i mean I do not deserve hate comments sorry

  • @chear8145
    @chear8145Ай бұрын

    Nah bro, being so evil that the old king of germany is ashamed of being german is crazy tho.

  • @Teufer2

    @Teufer2

    Ай бұрын

    1. He was the "Kaiser" in english the "Emperor" of Germany, not the King. He was the King of Prussia as well. Emperors had often several titels. An "Emperor" is above a King. There were several Kingdoms in Germany at that time. One of the already mentioned Kingdom of Prussia which Willhelm II was King. The Kingdom of Saxony, the Kingdom of Bavaria and the Kingdom of Württemberg. 2. Officially he was called the "german Emperor" and not the "Emperor of Germany". To not offend the other German Kings and the Austrian Emperor.

  • @chear8145

    @chear8145

    Ай бұрын

    @Teufer2 bro really said, "erm actually" Towards a joke about insulting hitler

  • @Teufer2

    @Teufer2

    29 күн бұрын

    @@chear8145 Well from now one i am gonna call George Washington the first Chancellor of the USA

  • @chear8145

    @chear8145

    29 күн бұрын

    @@Teufer2 sure go ahead idc

  • @felliceteii6944

    @felliceteii6944

    27 күн бұрын

    Average redditor:@@Teufer2

  • @ZayZoot
    @ZayZoot23 күн бұрын

    Technically there is still a German Royal Family, just that the head of the family lives in The Netherlands and the family no longer has any royal titles.

  • @jamesseaman2950

    @jamesseaman2950

    Сағат бұрын

    Descendants of Wilhelm's family live in Germany, as do those of the other former royal houses, but they do so as common citizens. Germany is now a republic, and the former nobility no longer has privileges or immunities, nor does Germany grant or recognize titles of nobility.

  • @DerHeiner
    @DerHeinerКүн бұрын

    Im actually a bit surprised. Everything I’ve read about Wilhelm was that he made the Jews responsible for his downfall and only criticised the progroms because they were “bolshevistic”. And even his quote that he is ashamed to be a German was revoked multiple times by himself.

  • @VillagerPlaystationVita

    @VillagerPlaystationVita

    9 сағат бұрын

    Wilhelm was a political opportunist and often flip-flopped when it came to Hitler.

  • @bocchithean-cap3404
    @bocchithean-cap3404Ай бұрын

    Correction Until kaiserdom is restored his body remains in Netherlands And by God we shall

  • @UlmanistLatvia

    @UlmanistLatvia

    Ай бұрын

    Restoration of Monarchy in Germany seems very unlikely. Majority of people are not supporters of the idea.

  • @ivanbro1208
    @ivanbro120825 күн бұрын

    An aristocrat/noble who was raised to believe he was the sole owner of Germany seing a mere peasant be voted and adored in by millions of germans and you guys think he would look at adolf fondly?

  • @ModernDayRenaissanceMan
    @ModernDayRenaissanceMan8 күн бұрын

    I wish I knew what kind of app these people were using to make history videos so I can make my own

  • @mateuszobszanski274
    @mateuszobszanski27413 күн бұрын

    Kaizer Willhelm was for the war with France but he didn't aprove of the invasion of Poland saying that there needs to be a buffer between Germany and the soviets

  • @basedbane787
    @basedbane787Ай бұрын

    Notice how they never let you hear Dolph speak ? Think about it have you ever actually heard a single speech ?

  • @Willy_Tepes

    @Willy_Tepes

    Ай бұрын

    Have you ever seen any physical evidence of the horrific claims? Think about that too.

  • @basedbane787

    @basedbane787

    Ай бұрын

    @@Willy_Tepes unlike the vast majority of people ive looked into it and realized how ridiculously fake it is. Like "look at this polish camp in August" and it's covered in snow 😂

  • @Willy_Tepes

    @Willy_Tepes

    Ай бұрын

    @@basedbane787 This issue will eventually be publicly discussed whether they like it or not. We demand proof or reparations!

  • @Lgx-ie4if

    @Lgx-ie4if

    Ай бұрын

    Many many times like any grown adult… helps that I can even watch them in German and understand it first hand. What are you trying to say?

  • @snugget7601

    @snugget7601

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@Lgx-ie4if they're nazi sympathizers and/or holocaust deniers, clearly

  • @thrillzmania
    @thrillzmania26 күн бұрын

    He said he regretted the favors for the bankers aswell

  • @Whatsbludoing

    @Whatsbludoing

    20 күн бұрын

    Your literally muslim sthu😂😂😂

  • @Newdivide
    @NewdivideКүн бұрын

    Btw the mansion where Whielm lived was confiscated by the Dutch after the war

  • @thecommander9137
    @thecommander913713 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm refused to be buried in Germany unless his son or descendants had reclaimed the throne. He still isn't buried.

  • @u_dot635
    @u_dot635Ай бұрын

    i didn't know wilhelm was so based

  • @matthewdavid6134
    @matthewdavid6134Ай бұрын

    I’m not a fan of Wille he made a lot of mistake and was generally an idiot, but I commend that he wasn’t a Nazi, and generally viewed them with the contempt they deserved

  • @ibraheemshuaib8954

    @ibraheemshuaib8954

    Ай бұрын

    he wasn't a great guy, but he also wasn't a bad guy, he was average as far as monarchs go.

  • @rarescevei8268

    @rarescevei8268

    20 күн бұрын

    ​@@ibraheemshuaib8954He was quite good tho. Under him, Germany was a leading nation in technology, economy and progressiveness.

  • @bri_____
    @bri_____Күн бұрын

    Frankly, I'm certain that if he could see Europe today, his opinion would change quite drastically.

  • @Spaibo

    @Spaibo

    20 сағат бұрын

    So you think that's better than today?

  • @VillagerPlaystationVita

    @VillagerPlaystationVita

    9 сағат бұрын

    You think the Holocaust is comparable to immigration? You are an absolute lunatic.

  • @nashzahm
    @nashzahm25 күн бұрын

    Lavader has a good series on Wilhelm II's life that taught me a lot about him

  • @gcr1010
    @gcr1010Ай бұрын

    W wilhelm

  • @Willy_Tepes
    @Willy_TepesАй бұрын

    The emperor was replaced. Why should he have a positive view of him?

  • @zacharyhenderson2902
    @zacharyhenderson290214 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm said all of that privately. And he wasn't buried in the Netherlands

  • @Jer2010
    @Jer201021 күн бұрын

    We have to remember this is all because Hitler would not restore the monarchy. Hitler saw the monarchy as the reason that they lost the Great War especially when the Kaiser allowed the Jews to infiltrate German politics and then he flees at the end of the war. He did not like that and did not restore the monarchy although Göring did tru

  • @KDubOriginal
    @KDubOriginalАй бұрын

    Wilhelm is a true emperor, showing poise and wisdom and denouncing the atrocious actions of the nazi regime.

  • @varelion
    @varelionАй бұрын

    Well, Wilhelm II was no saint himself. His egomania made Germany isolated and he prepared for war, even building a fleet that could match with the British fleet. Also because of him WW1 broke out with all the consequences including the emerging of the National Socialist Party. A greater Joffrey Lannister perhaps.

  • @John4Ger

    @John4Ger

    Ай бұрын

    You don’t know much about Kaiser Wilhelm nor about the cause of WW1. It’s more complicated than that.

  • @cmd7930

    @cmd7930

    Ай бұрын

    So much nonsense. Wilhelm was Joffrey? The French were opressing the German people of Alsace Loraine and the Brits were scared of Germany becoming too powerful and wanting their own colonial empire. WWI definitely wasnt Germany’s fault at all. Germany commited some bad actions in the war but the cause of war definitely begins with the French. Treaty of Versailles was also done by the French and they brought Germany to ruin and then radicalization followed leading to WWII.

  • @varelion

    @varelion

    Ай бұрын

    @@cmd7930 Again, read more carefully! I wrote that also because of Wilhelm the war broke out. He could have prevented it. But in the end, almost all representatives of all affected nations acted too stubbornly and already in confrontative politics. Regarding his behaviour, especially in military, you have to admit that Wilhelm acted like a child building a massive fleet on the backs of his people only to play a dangerous game of "Who is the most powerful monarch?" BTW: Don't mistake Wilhelm II as the wish and will of the German people.

  • @thiago292

    @thiago292

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@varelionThe massive naval build up made sense, both Britain and Germany were enemies. And once it stopped making sense (when the relation between went back to normality) it stopped. Germany is not at fault for starting World War 1, Wilhelm was dragged into the war by Austria and France. Not saying that Wilhelm was a saint or anything, but he was clearly not a fault for starting the war, it began because of things outside his control.

  • @varelion

    @varelion

    Ай бұрын

    @@thiago292 Well, signing the declaration of war against Russia was in his control. But he alredy had given in to the agenda of the war party as the Russian Tsar also did. The monarchs had become symbols or just representatives. Still, depicting Wilhelm II as an opposite figure to Hitler and thus glorifying him is only half of the truth. When Hitler defeated France, he congretulated him. He didn't suffer from the war as the people of the Netherlands did.

  • @denniskylling3887
    @denniskylling388710 күн бұрын

    I love how it pronounces "Wilhem" with a "ee"

  • @andrejbogdanov2816
    @andrejbogdanov28168 күн бұрын

    When you say "Wilhelm", it sounds like you're swallowing your own tongue while throwing up food you ate a month ago.

  • @sandrocottusrex7108
    @sandrocottusrex7108Ай бұрын

    इतिहास कितना रोचक है! एक व्यक्ति, जिसने प्रथम विश्व युद्ध शुरू करवाया, दूसरे व्यक्ति, जिसने द्वितीय विश्व युद्ध शुरू करवाया, के विषय में शंका रखता है। सबसे कमाल की बात तो यह है कि दोनों एक दूसरे के समकालीन थे। ज़रा सोचिए, यदि दोनों आमने-सामने आते तो कैसा दृश्य होता!

  • @vladtc2732
    @vladtc2732Ай бұрын

    Lies

  • @Littlefish1239
    @Littlefish123920 күн бұрын

    Wilhem was a real one

  • @Littlefish1239

    @Littlefish1239

    20 күн бұрын

    Nvm but it’s still good that he didn’t like Hitler

  • @patrickmiano7901
    @patrickmiano79013 күн бұрын

    He and the Hapsburgs set the stage.

  • @frankejk
    @frankejkАй бұрын

    Damn Wilhelm went woke

  • @Fujiwara88
    @Fujiwara88Ай бұрын

    L Kaiser

  • @karolb8924
    @karolb892423 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm was wrong.

  • @Whatsbludoing

    @Whatsbludoing

    20 күн бұрын

    Another puppet spotted😂

  • @ronnietheartist4020
    @ronnietheartist4020Күн бұрын

    Well nobody remembered him i didn't

  • @tracym8952
    @tracym8952Ай бұрын

    Hitler was in the freikorps after ww1. Wilhelm was his boss. Hitler was supposed to give power back to the monarchy in the 30s but decided he liked power himself

  • @Willy_Tepes

    @Willy_Tepes

    Ай бұрын

    He assumed power legally and was under no obligation to hand it over to an old emperor. He had a job to do and he did it well.

  • @jimineegelicker

    @jimineegelicker

    27 күн бұрын

    Hitler was never a member of the Freikorps.

  • @-Teca-
    @-Teca-28 күн бұрын

    LOL Wilhelm saying hes ashamed to be German is rich coming from the guy responsible for all this

  • @Captain_Obvious69420

    @Captain_Obvious69420

    26 күн бұрын

    It's all the Austrians fault

  • @LeonDS17414

    @LeonDS17414

    26 күн бұрын

    The austrians started it and during the war, Wilhelm had nearly no power, Hindenburg and ludendorf did most of the stuff

  • @Julian-xr5db
    @Julian-xr5db14 күн бұрын

    I love the guy with the moustache❤️

  • @gotthelfschwab1272
    @gotthelfschwab127212 сағат бұрын

    Yet Wilhelm's decision to go to war and loose, laid the foundation for the uprise of the brown shirts.

  • @nicholasmarzigliano7616
    @nicholasmarzigliano761623 күн бұрын

    Although Wildham was a bit of a lunatic himself, when it came to his criticisms of the Third Riech he was spot on.

  • @rarescevei8268

    @rarescevei8268

    20 күн бұрын

    He wasnt a lunatic

  • @nicholasmarzigliano7616

    @nicholasmarzigliano7616

    20 күн бұрын

    ​@rarescevei8268 uh, yes he was.

  • @rarescevei8268

    @rarescevei8268

    20 күн бұрын

    @@nicholasmarzigliano7616 Why do you consider him such?

  • @nicholasmarzigliano7616

    @nicholasmarzigliano7616

    20 күн бұрын

    Compared to Hitler he was Sigmund Freud. He was not a sociopath in that regard. However from all reports he was quite irrational and would often fly into rages of anger, thought he knew more than his Generals, got his country in an unwinnable World War that crippled its economy for decades that caused many German citizens their lives. In the end he lived in exile for the rest of his life. That doesn't sound like a practical human being to me.

  • @rarescevei8268

    @rarescevei8268

    20 күн бұрын

    @@nicholasmarzigliano7616 1. During a war, if you have to lead a country during it, you'd be stressed too. 2. That makes no sense, Germany was under military government control during the war, Wilheilm didnt have the ability to interfere with his generals' actions. 3. It wasnt unwinnable. Germany almost won the war, which would have made it the dominant global power. 4. Wilheilm isnt at fault for the situation in Europe at the time, Bismarck is.

  • @user-ev7vh2xh7t
    @user-ev7vh2xh7tКүн бұрын

    Although, he wasn't buried in the Netherlands, he is just in a coffin, but if Germany ever becomes a Monerchy, Wilhelm would be buried there.

  • @VillagerPlaystationVita

    @VillagerPlaystationVita

    9 сағат бұрын

    Which it never will be.

  • @derekthekiller9140
    @derekthekiller914021 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm II was responsible for the expansion of WW1. He declared war on Russia because they mobilised against Austro-Hungary when they started a blatantly aggressive war against Serbia. Wilhelm then also declared war on France and then invaded neutral Belgium. When the UK sent Germany an ultimatum threatening war if they did not withdraw from Belgium, Wilhelm outright ignored it, assuming the UK would not be involved.

  • @Beorthere
    @Beorthere8 күн бұрын

    One could say, Wilhelm was Fuhrerious with Hitler 😅

  • @TTT-zl9dk
    @TTT-zl9dk20 күн бұрын

    No, no, no. Clearly no. Wilhelm II. was a big Fan of Hitler. He wrote many love letters to Hitler and even photographed himself with a Swastika bandage in his house.

  • @rarescevei8268

    @rarescevei8268

    20 күн бұрын

    Suuuureee

  • @TTT-zl9dk

    @TTT-zl9dk

    19 күн бұрын

    @@rarescevei8268 Search it up.

  • @kkupsky6321
    @kkupsky632112 күн бұрын

    Hohenzollern says what? I’d be mad too if I lost my empire to some Austrian corporal and failed artist. Hitler reminds me of a recent former USA president

  • @Cjnw

    @Cjnw

    3 күн бұрын

    XLV 😂

  • @jonathaslopes8038
    @jonathaslopes803820 күн бұрын

    At least the guy had principles.

  • @leviashanken2506
    @leviashanken25068 күн бұрын

    What rank royalty was he? Did he have any power to stop Hitler? Did he try at all in any way?

  • @Blazloch4506

    @Blazloch4506

    7 күн бұрын

    He was the Keiser (German word for emperor) during WW1 but after they lost he stepped down and fled to Holland

  • @leviashanken2506

    @leviashanken2506

    7 күн бұрын

    @@Blazloch4506 so he was part of the cause of WW1?

  • @crispfriars
    @crispfriars19 күн бұрын

    Willy couldn't even avoid war with his own cousins so...

  • @AWP_OWNER
    @AWP_OWNER21 күн бұрын

    They met several times in person and you cut out like the majority of the quote

  • @altekamerad
    @altekamerad10 күн бұрын

    Ah yes, Kaiser Wielhelm. Wielhelm… Wilhelm, not Wielhelm.

  • @S.C.F_FG_42
    @S.C.F_FG_4218 күн бұрын

    Wilhem ll praise hitler on invading french and become a warm friend to the point that Wilhem wish that hitler to be a emperor Explanations in details are in Mark Felton Productions video

  • @thespyfromtf2133
    @thespyfromtf2133Ай бұрын

    man idk about this Viel Helm guy, hope hes ok

  • @scp170190
    @scp170190Ай бұрын

    The ex-Kaiser and Hitler mutually resented each other because one thought the other a pleb and vice-versa

  • @pavelprokopovski3380
    @pavelprokopovski338027 күн бұрын

    W Wilhelm opinion on Hitler

  • @TheBandit025Nova
    @TheBandit025Nova19 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm should gave up his German nationality proclaimed he’s British I think his cousin would understand

  • @adamdavis9838
    @adamdavis983820 күн бұрын

    It's Weird to see Wilhelm with a normal left arm.

  • @shaikmohiddin4397
    @shaikmohiddin439721 күн бұрын

    He is not buried waiting for burried untill his family become emperor again ..

  • @identity7536
    @identity753624 күн бұрын

    He‘s a good example of historical people not being one dimensional enough to categorize them simply as Good/Bad in most cases. yes he disliked hitler a lot. But he also started the 1. war in the form it happened with no real need for it. Although the Austrians technically started it with germany as the big ally on day one, it was the german kaiser that convinced the austrian one to do so. Both their parliaments begged them bit to do it since it was clear how much such a war would cost everyone and Bismark‘s work to keep peace in europe was not forgotten by the plolititians yet. But the two rulers wanted glory and had the romantized vision of war as a heros saga in their mind. That compared to great advancements in military technology they thought would make their next war basically unloosable even tho everyone else had the same was what made them jump at the very forst oportunity. It is worth mentioning that europe would have errupted into war at some other point soon as it is. But a lot of things would have been different like all of the soviet revolts likely not happening without lenin not being smuggled back in at the time he was cause Germany wouldn‘t have needed him to stirr civil unrest at this time. Either way he was not a good man himself. And that he disliked an even worse man later in life doesn‘t make him a good man alone

  • @Alpffine
    @Alpffine10 күн бұрын

    You conveniently left out after France fell, Kaiser Whilhelm sent a congratulatory telegram to Hitler: "Under the deeply moving impression of France's capitulation I congratulate you and all the German armed forces on the God-given prodigious victory with the words of Kaiser Wilhelm the Great of the year 1870: 'What a turn of events through God's dispensation!' All German hearts are filled with the chorale of Leuthen, which the victors of Leuthen, the soldiers of the Great King sang: Now thank we all our God!"

  • @benjaminaustin9030
    @benjaminaustin903013 күн бұрын

    Veelhelm? Mad pronunciation, never heard of it.

  • @angelmarauder5647
    @angelmarauder56478 күн бұрын

    Whoa the autocrat didn't like the socialist!? Noone could have guessed.

  • @masterofallthelakesintown2472
    @masterofallthelakesintown247216 күн бұрын

    Well at first he asked him to reinstate him as Kaiser after hitler got elected. Also his family including his first born did not shy away with collaborating. Still he wasn’t the incarnation of evil just a miserable and broken man that tried to do good and meet the expectation of his people but ultimately failed largely because of his cocky and unaware attitude at diplomacy as well through his fragile ego and suicidal tendencies. He wasn’t mentally stable but at least he was kind to Jewish Germans and oddly enough to the Turkish as far as to saying that if he wouldn’t have been born German he could only be and love to be a Turk.

  • @GeneralOfThe212th
    @GeneralOfThe212th28 күн бұрын

    You should pronounce it Will-Helm instead of Wheel-Helm

  • @tusk70
    @tusk7016 сағат бұрын

    We are teached to hate Kaiser Wilhelm II. in Germany. So sad!

  • @KephasIsStPeter
    @KephasIsStPeter26 күн бұрын

    I often wonder how differently the 20th century would have been if the Kaiser retained his power after the first World War.

  • @AshishKumar-wz3dp
    @AshishKumar-wz3dp11 күн бұрын

    Comparing two maniacs and thinking one is better than other

  • @schlieffenman957
    @schlieffenman95724 күн бұрын

    Wilhelm, despite his flaws, was actually a pretty normal, decent person. He was a much a victim of WWI as any other, since he lost all control over his country against his will to the military yet was blamed for all of Germany's wrongdoings in WWI. He didn't even want the war to happen. I'm just glad he got to live the rest of his life in peace and quiet, unlike SOME Russian Tzar I could mention...