Humphrey: “Should we subsidise sex perhaps?”. Bernard: “Oh, could we?”!!! Just brilliant, as always!

@victorandresgarciaguardia3747

2 жыл бұрын

Bernard´s face... priceless!

@redrackham6812

2 жыл бұрын

In 2010, a local council in Britain used government funds allocated to provide services for the disabled to send a learning-disabled man to Amsterdam to hire a prostitute, thereby subsidizing sex. There is a thin line between parody and prophecy.

@ChristmasCrustacean1

2 жыл бұрын

Bernard was the absolute best character

@tennyho3236

Жыл бұрын

PaREntAl LeaVe pAY

@mikeberna296

Жыл бұрын

And here we are: 40-50 years after this was filmed and STILL no subsidy for sex! 🤣

The face Hacker makes when Humphrey says "it's the end of civilization" 😂

@neilgerace355

2 жыл бұрын

But Hacker feels fine

@urmo345

Жыл бұрын

definitely trolling

One of the rare moments Hacker gets the last laugh.

@felixlps1

3 жыл бұрын

In the end Sir Humphrey was still successful

@ayush885

2 жыл бұрын

@@felixlps1 hacker and Humphrey were both successful. Hacker got another ministry, meaning a slight promotion. Humphrey made his department bigger, making sure that all civil servants realised his cunning.

As ever, Bernard sits there for a couple of minutes before delivering the killer line!

@shadow_realm47

2 жыл бұрын

Bernard was Stone Cold with that line.

Even the name "Humphrey" is so suitable! Such a wonderful production

Works outing at The Royal Opera House. Priceless, they'll all be on the bus home with their fish and chips, drinking Watney's Red Barrel and singing Nessun Dorma in three different keys at the same time at the top of their voices.

@IndigoIndustrial

2 жыл бұрын

That would be an interesting business - Opera on a bus.

@Hiperruimteindustriee

2 жыл бұрын

What is Watney's red barrel? Is it martian beer?

"You dont want to miss your works outing" - classic

@frog382

2 жыл бұрын

I had to think about it to understand it LOL, it IS brilliant

@AnirudhSrivatsa

Ай бұрын

I didn't understand this, could you please explain this joke?

@pembertr0n

Ай бұрын

@@AnirudhSrivatsa "Work outing" for most people would be a couple beers down at the pub, not a night at the opera in full tuxedo

"Why should we subsidise the culture of the Axis Powers.." WOW.. 🤣 (shots 'literally' fired)

@dngillikin

3 жыл бұрын

@PatchesRips Jim Hacker came to power in part due to nationalistic public sentiment against EU mandates from Brussels, particularly regulations that would force the relabeling of the traditional "English sausage" into something unappealing like the "high-fat offal tube." Jim Hacker was elected to protect the beloved English sausage from the dreaded Eurosausage.

@crispyrolls93

3 жыл бұрын

@PatchesRips to be fair, someone who is around their age at the time would have been children/young men during the war. I imagine it can be hard to not have that influence your views on certain countries that you were at war with in your lifetime. I imagine it is understandable.

@thiagodeandrade7081

2 жыл бұрын

At the same time, he was a "good European" and tjought about accepting a job in Brussels. Not the man one would expect to be comllaining abiut subsidizing the cultures of Axis Powers.

@blaze4111

2 жыл бұрын

@@thiagodeandrade7081 well, that wasn't really his issue, he made it as a counter argument for humphrey saying culture must be subside to be preserved and hacker fired back by saying "it's not really english culture is it?" the point was to call humphrey on his bullshit and to point out the real reason is self indulgence of the middle-class.

@thiagodeandrade7081

2 жыл бұрын

@@blaze4111 Sure. He was being witty and sarcastic. Still, not the kind of argument he would like to see associated to him in the papers.

Genius writing and supreme talented delivery. Timeless

Shakespeare did sort of get a "public subsidy". Obviously that didn't exist in his day, but he was a beneficiary of royal patronage.

Hacker is right in everything he says...but somehow I still agree with everything Humphrey says.

@ahmadyasin8674

2 жыл бұрын

That's the beauty of the show. No one's wrong. That's brilliant writing.

@Jotari

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahmadyasin8674 I'd say those guys trying to keep a hospital with no patients running were firmly in the wrong.

@matthewcoates756

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahmadyasin8674 One side is the people with less power (or money) in the country and the other side is the one with more power (and money) in the country.

@GoldenSunAlex

Жыл бұрын

@@matthewcoates756 Doesn't mean one side is better than the other - envy of the wealthy has always been a thing, but it doesn't mean that they're wrong.

@a-yon_n

Жыл бұрын

As I grow older and work longer, more and more I’m on Humphrey’s side.

The British attitude to arts and culture can best be summed up thus. If the Government burned all the paintings in the National Gallery and National Portrait Gallery there would be a few angry letters to newspapers, if the banned Premier League football there would be riots.

To be fair, Shakespeare did (sort of) receive public money as pay for his work. He was a member of a theater company called The Lord Chamberlain's Men, founded by a Baron who was in charge of court entertainment under the reign of Elizabeth the First. All money that funded such endeavors would have come from the crown, which by definition was all public money...

Love this scene - ‘works outing’. It’s funny that although it was never shown what party Hacker belonged to; many of his causes and speeches were very ‘left’ leaning like this one. Usually he was very anti-establishment. And he was formerly an editor of a satirical newspaper I think before becoming an MP.

@jaireidca

2 жыл бұрын

I think of this as quite right-leaning. It argues for less government intervention and letting business stand or fall on its own merit. It only uses the left-leaning “subsidizing the middle class” language as a tool.

@atomicexistentialism8428

Жыл бұрын

I think the christmas special indicates. Since Labour are far too queasy about kicking their own out, the Tories where brutal. There's a brilliant scene where Humphrey asks Hacker if he's being Indecisive, and Hacker starts panicking.

@Samplesurfer

Жыл бұрын

The writers have actually indicated Hacker was written with a moderate Conservative party minister in mind. It becomes a bit more obvious in the Yes, Prime Minister series, in particular in the scenes with his political assistant.

@ahwabanmukherjee5065

Жыл бұрын

I'm lean slightly to the right and I agreed with almost everything he said. That's actually the brilliance of the writers. They don't make things like this anymore. More like they can't.

@adamwelch6217

Жыл бұрын

Hacker is always looking to cut costs, cut taxes and is only too happy to pick a fight with the unions. So clearly a conservative but perhaps small c

The direction is superb. 2:20 "why should the working man on the terraces" (minister points out to Bernard ) then he gives a quick glance to minister then contineues

"I don't want to make you late for your works outing..." Beautifully put!

Love the ending of this episode where Jim asks if he can attend the opera with Humphrey as well

Love the way Hacker mocked him like a schoolgirl for going to the Opera.

If people want it, they'll pay for it. Football clubs are commercial ventures, they are formed by money to make money. If they run out of money, they close, nothing is really lost. I think Humphrey said it best: "Subsidies are for what people don't want, _but ought to have."_

@SpeckleKen

3 жыл бұрын

You wouldn't have an Internet on which to say this if it hadn't been for public subsidy.

@aliwakanda7327

3 жыл бұрын

Well opera houses aren’t things that ‘ought to be having’ either, if u come to think about it and some others would beg to differ.

@ZATennisFan

3 жыл бұрын

And who gets to decide what the people aught to have?

@jamesgreene6817

2 жыл бұрын

If people don’t want it they shouldn’t ought to have it.

@mickadatwist1620

2 жыл бұрын

@@ZATennisFan a conservative government....local or central

Oh.. U missed.. "flying dutchman!" "Ah, another one of our European partners"

this comedy is truth. never thought about art like this before.

@jesseberg3271

3 жыл бұрын

It's worth noting that 9 million pounds, even in the 1980s, is nothing by the standards of Government expenses. That 9 million pounds would be worth about 35 million pounds today, roughly comparable to what was spent to build the first Wembley Stadium in the 1920s (750k, 45 million in today's pounds). Both of those suns are small fry compared to the 60 billion pound defense budget, the 115 billion pound budget for the NHS, and the other 700 billion pound in the budget over all. If a Minister is complaining about 0.004% of the budget being wasted, he's probably politically grandstanding, and if a country like the UK can't afford to spend more than 0.004% of its budget on art *and* more than 0.004% of its budget on sport at the same time, and still do everything else it needs to, it's in serrious trouble.

@droceretik

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesseberg3271 sums

@markomarkovic8177

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesseberg3271 No one here is claiming that we can't build infrastructure. If there is a demand for more theaters, I say the government should step in and help to some extent...although, if there was such a high demand for more theaters then the government wouldn't have to subsidise anything - they would have the money to do it themselves. The issue at hand is government sponsoring of a highly unprofitable branch which only serves as a mean of acquiring feelings of moral and intellectual superiority among the select few. Throwing in national defense and healthcare in that conversation is completely ridiculous.

@mayoite160

2 жыл бұрын

@@markomarkovic8177 yeah gotta love the false equivalence of literal lifesaving with literal snobbery

@FutureChaosTV

2 жыл бұрын

@@markomarkovic8177 I can tell you that all theaters, museums etc... would have to close (also btw. not only rich people go to theaters, but without cheap tickets no one from below the high class could afford a ticket). And if you CAN'T see that this would make society poorer and more boring even, than you should maybe go to North Korea or to Afghanistan to see how you like a life without music, theater, movie theaters, sports. Living in cities without variety even without public displays of art like sculptures, paintings, artful parks etc... Not really worth living. Only a sociopath might enjoy such a society like very fitting Kim Jong-Un.

If it was a cricket stadium Sir Humphrey would have sold that Art Museum himself

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in some sense Shakespeare did get subsidies. His company, the King's Men had a royal patron after all, in the person of James I.

@narendrapanse7844

8 ай бұрын

i think it was patronage - different from subsidies. But then, i could be wrong.

I love this episode, especially, when Hacker ends up accompanying Humphrey to the opera to Humphrey's delight

Timeless and brilliantly played and written!!!!

Absolutrly top notch this show. Not one bad episode..genius from writing to production

Apart from comedy,it is very healthy discussion about topic.

It's nice to see Hacker win one here and there.

There's only two other programs equal to this, the new statesman and the thick of it but yes minister is my favourite.

@jeremyadler9620

3 жыл бұрын

There are two other shows made here in Australia that are in the same vein, both made by the same production company. There was The Hollowmen, which was about the civil servants who have to work around the offices of power and now there's Utopia, which is about the Nation Building Authority, which is a new government organisation and how they cope with bureaucracy combined with the ambitions of government. Both are HIGHLY recommended, although you might get a bit frustrated by the latter show, as you really feel for the protagonists and how they're forced to cope with things. Still great though :)

@robmarrin6720

3 жыл бұрын

@@jeremyadler9620 nice one thanks I'll have a look at them 👍

@jeremyadler9620

3 жыл бұрын

@@robmarrin6720, Hope you enjoy them :)

@MrThorfan64

3 жыл бұрын

@@jeremyadler9620 Oh this does sound good, hopefully not too difficult for non-Australians to understand.

@jeremyadler9620

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrThorfan64, I doubt it'll be difficult to get. It's all pretty straightforward :)

It is long past due we stop comparing this comedy with any other. Yes Minister/Prime Minister has no equal. It has established it's own class which I don't expect to be reached by any other.

God I love this so much

I really love these where Jim gets it over SIR Humphrey

Somehow, we've come to the point that modern top-flight football sounds just like everything that's been described as art in this clip.

@UnleashthePhury

11 ай бұрын

You either die the hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain

They don’t make ‘em like this anymore! 😆

@MohitKumar-nc6kt

Жыл бұрын

Mostly because they do not need to. This will be applicable in all governments, for ever.

"subsidizing by popular demand" is the exact opposite of why subsidizing exists in the first place

They can’t make good comedy like that anymore

Pure gold!

0:34 "culturrrral herrritage" makes it sound better

Brilliant program and probably very close to the truth.

@johnbanks4761

2 жыл бұрын

Perfectly

Hi great video. Have an awesome day. Hugs from Argentina

all very valid points !

Hlarious! The whole debate took place on the BBC, which is subsidized by a tax on TV and radios.

@maxpower.5189

2 жыл бұрын

...which is enjoyed by the masses majority of whom, probably couldn't afford cable or subscription based tv. If its left to Bernard (and, yours truly too!), we'd be subsidizing for better quality on The Sun's Page 3, which is of course, still enjoyed by the masses .....

what Jim says, and what Hump says are EXACTLY what was said in the past about the Art funding Opera vs Football issue. It's gone away now since Arts Council England get loads of money from the Lottery. So the Arts are still subsidised by us, or rather people who buy lottery tickets

Brilliant!

Absolutely brilliant

The BBC does two things very well. Sitcoms/Comedy and Documenties.

Both are right neither should be subsidised

I agree with Humphrey on this one.

@Robert-hz9bj

Жыл бұрын

I agree somewhat with Hackett's sentiment about the arts being primarily accessible to the elites of society, but I disagree with his takeaway. The solution should not be to just fund things that are accessible to the greater mass of the public (like commercial sports), but rather to make the arts more accessible to the wider public. Demand subsidies for galleries and symphonies be used to make tickets cheaper. Have set nights where the opera or symphony is free, and the performance in a large enough venue to accommodate as many people as possible. Limit the number of tickets that can be sold in advance to avoid them only going to people with connections. I firmly believe these things have benefits to society and people, and having them trapped behind a paywall is almost obscene...

@ravenwilder4099

Жыл бұрын

@@Robert-hz9bj Yeah, if the complaint's that only the wealthy/influential get in, taking subsidies away isn't gonna make things any better.

Bernard sits back and watch them both. Love it!!! Go Bernard. You were blessed just to be with these other giants of actors. Blessings 🎉

Does anyone siding with Hacker on this one realise that by watching this video, they have been enjoying subsidised art?

@leonodonoghueburke4276

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, the subsidised art that can be enjoyed by the masses, the same kind he promoted in the first place

I'm with Humphrey on this one

@jeffreymeehan3116

Жыл бұрын

I'm with Hacker more but 100% with him when he mentions films.

Nice to see Hacker get the better of Sir Humphrey for a change.

Jim points to Bernard when he says - the man on the street. Bernard is not a man on the street

@minhtrungle9117

5 ай бұрын

Bernard is a stand-in that represents the wider audience, the people who are watching the show (hence the questions that he usually asks Jim/Humphrey that the audience themselves would). So he really refers to "the working man" even though it is a fourth-wall-breaking kind of a deal.

the GAA gets 57 mil a year from the irish government the Smallest towns in Ireland may not have a shopping centre or any other facilities but damn they will have immaculate Gaelic pitches

@ashtree7213

2 жыл бұрын

It doesn't. As part of an overall €73.6 million package of Covid-19 related funding for sporting bodies, the GAA, IRFU and FAI receive a combined total of €57 mil. GAA receive €20m, the IRFU €19m and the FAI €18m.

Very topical.

it is actually quite difficult issue to decide. I can't even take sides here.

another great informative insight to how the system works all done with comedy by great script and great actors . this series is still relevent to by the way gvrmt works to its own advantage

@bazza945

2 жыл бұрын

Reportedly, Maggie Thatcher loved it.

2:40 okay, this is a nit pick, and one that is up to interpretation, but Shakespeare and his theatre company were sponsored first by Queen Elizabeth and then by King James. It’s not a public subsidy per say, but it seems pretty comparable.

@trooperdgb9722

7 ай бұрын

No its not. PATRONAGE is not "public subsidy" and patronage is exactly what should be supporting the Arts. Build tax breaks into it if necessary... but make it PRIVATE sponsorship.

That ballet could torch your ankle.

Paul Eddingtons / jim hackers facial expressions when he trumps Humphry is great.....

So many great lines... I can't decide between "Ballet", "Should we subsidise sex perhaps?" "Oh could we?" or "I don't want to make you late for your works outing?" Shakespeare did in fact get public subsidy - he wasn't writing for the King's Men for nothing.

@kaptinkeiff

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, Sir Humphrey's case is definitely stronger here

@narendrapanse7844

3 жыл бұрын

Nopes! It was not subsidy. It was patronage. That is different from subsidy. In the book version Hacker makes this point.

@narendrapanse7844

3 жыл бұрын

@Lauren Michelle Lynley Might it be inopportune to point out that the Royals owned a significant of the country and were stinking rich to start with? Slightly besides the point, but the Medici's, the original big bankers, that probably would have made the Rothschild's look like school kids, paid for almost all of the Renaissance.

@gedonckers

3 жыл бұрын

@@narendrapanse7844 Not inopportune if true. And it is true. Here is a short version of how economic systems evolved: Medieveal Feudalism -> Mercantiilism -> Laissez Faire Capitalism -> Social-Democratic Capitalism. The movement of money was always from the top to bottom regarding subsidies or patronage and from bottom to top regarding production. Serfs give X amount of assets to their lord = lord is rich. Then lord provides X amount of assets to whomever they deem fit. Granted, lords didn't do that much. But someone always had to pay for artworks. In order to pay, these artworks had to be directed at something of interest. So, go to any museum in Europe, look at Renaissance paitings, and you'll see some 90% of painting Biblical motifs. As with modern system of subsidies, the model of patronage relies on money earned by someone at the top and distributing it to someone below themselves. Now, how did the rich become the rich? That's an interesting question. In Feudalism, it was taxes. In Mercantilism, taxes, or investments via credit or both in combination. In early capitalism, the asset was labor of people in factories (something that deluded Marx in trying to build an economic system out if it - an unsurprising failure at that), and in the modern system it's taxes again, but now with greater accountability than before and with the knowledge of where (for some/the most part) the tax money is going. But that is just public subsidies. Private investing is still present, as it was in mercantilism, and it too can have tremendous public benefit. For instance a bunch of programs on PBS are financed by private foundations. So, it's a complex topic, and a fascinating array of historical developments, but one common thread is that the arts cannot, and never could have, survived on their own. Someone 'upstairs' always needed to support them, and the public interest was never sufficient for that (the great 'Myth of the Public' would have you believe that once people enjoyed arts more than today, but that is simply not true). Anyway, thanks to the great show for inspiring this diatribe. :)

What’s funny is that he isn’t against subsidising of the arts, he just thinks it should be arts people actually like. The opera could easily afford to fund itself via rich benefactors or if it does get subsidy they could be based in the regions. But it’s in London where very few can access it.

kudos go to the writers...who comes up with this humour😀

How 2021 this is!

Sport shouldn't be subsidised but neither should a niche thing like Opera or Interpretive dance. I love how YM and YPM are still gas funny and relevant today as when they were launched.

'Why should we subsidise the culture of the Axis powers?' to this day when you want to make yourself heard you invoke WW2. I would almost approve of a 3rd one if it meant no more invocations of the 2nd.

Sad thing is that during lockdowns people turn to the arts and culture to sustain them, but government support in the UK is so limited

2:38 Jim Hacker turns into a Muppet!

Subsidising sex is not a joke in Australia, but actually is reality. The government financially helps poor people with special needs to visit brothels which are legal in many Australian states.

Has anybody on this thread mentioned that Humphrey was completely correct? As a former opera musician myself, it’s obvious to me.

In the USA, we fund massive stadiums and not enough for the arts.

@tolep

2 жыл бұрын

What arts?

@mayoite160

2 жыл бұрын

massively profitable sporting franchises getting multimillion stadiums on the taxpayer's dime

@GoldenSunAlex

Жыл бұрын

You have arts?

@ravenwilder4099

Жыл бұрын

It's from a later episode, but: "ALL governments are ALWAYS being criticized for not giving enough to the arts."

@codymurphy3493

Жыл бұрын

Neither should get funding

Bernard: a man of French letters

I think subsidizing sex would be very popular haha.

Shakespeare was sponsored by the crown...

Humphrey is as ever completely right. Really I expected somewhat better if hacker, defunding the ROH, scandalous!

That wallpaper needs to be napalmed!

🥰

holaa

ooooooh love it , why do great hings have to stop ?

Hacker means Labour.... 😁

Football is part of culture, too.

To be fair, if it wasn't for the royal and noble patrons of art during the Renaissance, we would all still be in the dark ages. Culture is not meant for mass consumption, yet it is the common identity of the people. After all how many of us wear our ethnic dress or eat our national dish on a daily basis?

@tolep

2 жыл бұрын

Culture is what people consume. Mona Lisa is just a nice portrait. Made for sale.

Philistinism, nationalism, brazen pandering to the lower class, commercialism, sheer demagoguery...Sir Humphrey is absolutely right here.

@jeffreymeehan3116

Жыл бұрын

Do you seriously think that if the average person had the time and money to see a play or opera that they would not? It is one of the things in the ex-Socialist countries that the people miss the most! They could see the entire Wagner library over the weekend for pocket change. You think people in America wouldn't do the same for a Sondheim series? I know a dozen.

@williamthebonquerer9181

Жыл бұрын

@@jeffreymeehan3116 in socialist countries the art world be censored

What's the humour behind the humour is - it's still relevant today! Brexit, ironically dreamed up by those who wished to sobatage Brexit.

Sadly, they did fund S-x with The Family S-x Education touring Theatre show for 5+ year olds. Thankfully there are still some parents that believe children deserve an innocent childhood and it got banned. What a waste of tax money. That was not Art! Our Park gets lots of funding for Rugby. Businesses pay £300+ for a banner. Yet my daughter cannot even put up a A4 Education Raffle for a dog portrait to raise money for her Art and Music Education in the Park because the main Council has Elite Brick walls. My Independent Council would put up the Poster no problem. I got paid £25 a week to study Graphic Design in College in 1982. My friend got a job in Graphic Design thanks to this free education. Thanks to Thatchers Government. Today, 2022, students are getting in to debt to get an education and worse. They are brainwashed into Student Prostitution by the Media and Universities. So yes, the Arts should be funded. If tax payers money can be washed on brainwashing our children into prostitution, then they can damn we'll fund real artists.

Gala night is it? ... It is, since you ask.

When this was made in the 80s, of course there was no money in football. Seems like a world away now! Actually there is more money, but most of it's fuelled by debt. So today the minister is more likely to make the case that subsidising football is to promote sport and 'inclusion'. One quibble - the clock behind Jim reads 10.05. Assuming this is morning, isn't it bit early for Humphrey to need to leave for the Opera?

@eddievhfan1984

2 жыл бұрын

Based on what I've read about white tie attire, he may need every second he can get...

hii

I love football. It is the best game in the world. I have especially loved english premiere league since I have been a child. A MAN U fan through and through! But even I find it appalling that an art gallery would be sold to fund a football club. It is appalling, it is a desecration of culture. The world has already lost a great deal of art and culture due to religion and war, without subsidiary, we would lose even more art and culture.

@GoldenSunAlex

Жыл бұрын

Would you say it was...Barbarism?

It should be mentioned that I think it was Oliver Cromwell, or the other one, I get them mixed up, who completely destroyed British artistic talent on the grounds that it interfered with praying. And he did so much damage that it was not until Sir Edward Elgar in the late 19th century that Britain started to recover. But Britain never did, sadly.

Humphrey is right.

I mean I kind of agree with Sir Humphrey on this one. Art and culture are necessary to be subsidised because there's things that are supposed to be preserved for future generations. Sports is something that just sort of happens. A group of people get together and decide to play a sport or do a sport. They decide to finance their own sports teams etcetera and people decide whether they want to go to the sports and spend money. It's one of the reasons why I absolutely hate American politics because we subsidize sports over art and culture way too much. It gets so ridiculous that millions and millions of dollars are spent on new stadiums that people don't even really care about and don't need. They even built an aquarium inside a baseball stadium that cost 4 million dollars and has cracked in the last few years

The same arguments for the subsidizing of culture were made by people in favor of subsidizing the church Arts and sports should stand on their own And if they do get public funds it should serve an educational purpose to train students for those various industries.

Sir Nigel had a long time in the theatre career, which probably made him more angry

Maestro Ronaldinho could conduct an Opera House like no German or Italian could have ever dreamt of. A true artist.

Hacker for PM!

Hacker really has no couth.

Did Hacker just called the most powerful man in the UK "middle class" lol This "middle class" man literally controls the PM later on

@ravenwilder4099

Жыл бұрын

I think in Britain, "upper class" is reserved for actual, bona fide aristocrats, with titles and land holdings going back however many centuries.

Prophetic, unfortunately.

The only type of art Britain should never compromise on the the British museum, the things in that museum may very well have been something that belonged to another country before but we took it and have since kept it and we shall continue to keep it till the collapse of our great nation or it truly would be the end of all true british values.

@Youchubeswindon

2 жыл бұрын

I've never understood the argument of repatriation. In most cases the objects wouldn't currently exist if the British museum hadn't valued it's worth, helped understand it's story and how it fits into cultural heritage and been a damn good caretaker.