What do you think? Is the universe REALLY 27 billion years old?

@amacheick

10 ай бұрын

Very interesting

@EinsteinKnowedIt

10 ай бұрын

Age or duration is applicable to us, and things we see and discover in an infinite universe. We are not alone, though it is improbable that we will have a type of instrument sophisticated enough to see in detail planets surrounding our neighboring stars 🌟. Imagine a planet such as Earth with its moon or moon's all inhabited by a form of humanity like you or me and each in varying stages of development 🤔. Trans lunar slave trade would have been tough. How does one use oars to initiate the trans lunar injection. Enough of this for now. Nice work!

@t.a.r.s4982

10 ай бұрын

Bad science communication... just a study based on old theories like tired light, why is it published so much?

@KingBritish

10 ай бұрын

I don't think so based on the fact that the age of the universe has been verified in multiple ways that corroborate each other. The answer must be something else.

@smlanka4u

10 ай бұрын

A Big Bounce could happen gratually from more than 27 billion years. And is a general knowledge in eastern cultures.

You should never ask a Universe it's age.

@violatethemagistrate

10 ай бұрын

Just tell the universe that you appreciate it, and listen to it complains about its coworkers. 😮

@SpectraStarShooter

8 ай бұрын

Don’t ask its religion or politics either. We all know this. It’s just decency.

@MusingsFromTheJohn00

7 ай бұрын

You can always ask...

@alfsew

5 ай бұрын

@@MusingsFromTheJohn00 Don’t do it man. She might start a new big bang just to spite you 😰

@MusingsFromTheJohn00

5 ай бұрын

@@alfsew you ever wonder if the Great Attractor is a drain plug that has been opened up?

How far back can we reverse engineer the universe until we finally admit we have no idea and we as humans will never know

@Legendary_Bleu

10 ай бұрын

This is the correct answer. We don’t know and we never will

@AmethystMidnight

10 ай бұрын

It's the thrill of the journey, not the end.

@matthew6427

9 ай бұрын

We have to infer based on the best data we have & our data keeps getting better. We go from 13.5B to 13.75B, that's not a crazy difference. We will always look for answers to questions we pose. Even if we have absolutely no idea, we will continue to look. Should we stop trying, or even asking these questions? It's important work & even if we are wrong, it will be science that tells us why and how we were wrong.

Great video, the "13.8 Billion years" is what I grew up with, and it never occurred to me that it might not be a fixed, agreed upon number. I find it very exciting that someone is challenging that consensus that I took as a fact.

@noneedtoknow5315

10 ай бұрын

I always rejected the notion that a massive explosion occured near Houston, Texas and gave rise to all existence throwing matter exactly 13.7 billion light years in mere seconds so that the light emitted could take exactly 13.7 billion years to get back here to the center of the universe being as it would take light all 13.7 billion years to travel from 13.7 billion light years away. I still think that matter can't exceed the speed of light by itself, so it must have taken waaaaaay more than 14 billion years for those galaxies to get there in order for us to see the light emitted from that spot almost 14 billion years ago. Not to mention spacetime expansion at around 70 meters a second per parsec (about 3 light years), which may put that galaxy that we see being 14 BLY away at more like 70 BLY away... But I think we just don't know what we're talking about yet. I think the only edge to the universe is in the restaurant.😊

@LovethisNation

8 ай бұрын

It’s a cop out of science. A nice way of saying we guessed and you believed it so here, believe this new number 😊

@MusingsFromTheJohn00

7 ай бұрын

I've grown up with this being a changing value. Maybe the answer is either "We Do Not Know" or "It Is Infinite".

It is possible the early universe had a much faster clock and slowed as it expanded just like a planet orbiting a sun, and its proximity determines how fast it orbits its star. Time is not the same everywhere in the universe.

This is absolutely wild. I mean, do you really believe he is right? Is it really that old?

@officialinterstellarnews

10 ай бұрын

Unsure. He's taking a lot of liberties in his research. My assumption is likely not.

@stephenrobinson8244

10 ай бұрын

I think it could be, like there is always uncertainty.

@noneedtoknow5315

9 ай бұрын

I think it's far older than that!... How long did it take matter to travel 13.8 billion light years from its origin (if it had one to begin with) before it emitted the light that took 13.8 billion years to travel from there to earth for us to see it?!?... Matter (as molecules) can't even approach the speed of light without relativistic effects like a very dramatic redshift taking things like blue down into FM frequencies or maybe lower from our perspective. If they keep pursuing big bang, which has been disproven, they're going to have to say hundreds of billions of years of expansion, if not more! But that would mean throwing away a lot of science, so it won't happen! They'll find a plausible workaround. Perhaps they'll claim the speed of light (and mass) was exponentially higher for the first few hundred thousand years after the big bang, but before "the universe became transparent". If I look at a city from far enough away, it looks like a single sheet of light too! If there's enough dust in the way, it looks reddish (different reason, the dust is reddish, but same result as googols of free electrons over billions of light years of space). To quote Isaac asimov, someday our great great grandkids will look at our science and laugh! Just as we laugh at the idea of spontaneous generation, or the idea of fire and water being elements.

@eliv0o

8 ай бұрын

@@noneedtoknow5315 damn uve got a big brain i admire that 😁😁

@ItSpooling_

7 ай бұрын

@@noneedtoknow5315no one claims the Big Bang was the beginning. Most physicists agree the universe was likely already here before the CMB

I don't know the age but I do know it hard to have stars older than the universe.

@MrEnjoivolcom1

10 ай бұрын

That would immediately tell me, "hmm, I probably calculated the star's age wrongly" and try again.

@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman

10 ай бұрын

​@@MrEnjoivolcom1same

There is no such thing has nothing. Nothing is something. So what was there before? Define nothing. See, once you define it it becomes something. Oh the paradox. I had an English professor who wanted us to write a paper on nothing. We had all semester to do it. At the end I turned in nothing. It took me a long time to understand. She said Paul why didn’t you do the assignment. Well I did. She explain, I said once I put a single word on paper it becomes something. She says well done. Me and one other girl were the only ones to get credit.

@blacklyfe5543

9 ай бұрын

You are ignorant

@SWOTHDRA

3 ай бұрын

You are getting trapped in samantics. Your language is insufficient to describe the essence or the lack of essence of what is nothing and nothigness. Your language and your brain is to meger to understand and describe reality

@blackmagickdancer2282

Ай бұрын

There is no such thing as nothing. Even in "nothing" there is potential energy

Science is progress. Ever changing. I wouldn't be surprise if there is definite evidence that the universe is much older.

Amazing video. What my mind doesn't understand is what was before the Big bang? 😨😱

@blacklyfe5543

9 ай бұрын

Nothing was before the big bang

There is just no way in hell to guess the universes age

@SWOTHDRA

3 ай бұрын

True, not from our region

This is perfect to learn about universe

Excellent video. Definitely something to think about. I will say I admire the people who calculate these equations. My head would fuckin explode 😅

@officialinterstellarnews

10 ай бұрын

Thanks! Cool concept and idea. However, I hold no position that this claim will turn out to be verified. But a fun thing to think about!

@koloradokiller

10 ай бұрын

@@officialinterstellarnews Very much so. It's informative nonetheless & well worth the 10 minutes it took to watch it. The visuals were on point. Personally, I believe it will hold up. The universe is full of mysteries we've yet to discover

I've been thinking about these concepts for a long while, specifically the constants being variable. A Ted talk came out years ago that spoke about the constants changing over time and the science board (or whatever theyre called) flipped shit and told Ted to ban the talk (which got brought back with other banned talks)

@noneedtoknow5315

9 ай бұрын

If C is variable, people could leave the rule and taxes of the people in control! Elon Musk was going to colonize mars in 2022... It wasn't technology that stopped him, it was the powers that be not wanting a repeat of the formation of the U.S. and the resulting struggle to reclaim control of it, which they did with the war of 1812! Andrew Jackson issued government notes (money) that was backed by gold, and Miriam Rothschild told him the U.S. would be at war until it's money was debt based and backed by the European Central Bank. The Federal Reserve is a private agency and is NOT controlled, regulated OR influenced by U.S. government! A Government Bond is a promise to fulfill work hours and has a social security number printed on it! Look it up yourself! You are expected to put out a billion dollars worth of work in your lifetime! The fruit of your labor! So if you pick a billion apples and you get to keep about 3 million, but the other 997 million go to people who consider it beneath them to pick anything or even be in an orchard in the first place, how does that make you feel?!?!?!? You work to make rent so they can buy yachts and private airplanes and look down on you for not having 997 million apples per slave! They see it as disgusting that you work instead of exploiting people, but even if you tried, you're not part of their crowd and are not allowed to be like them unless you sell your soul and align all your values with the people that brought us Epstein island! How many names were on that manifesto? How many were prosecuted, or even mentioned? Don't worry, it isn't just Abrahamic religions that have revelations-esque predictions... The Hindi and most native American tribes, a few African tribes etc. all have very similar stories... Of course they all talk about mountains melting like wax and all the oceans drying up, but that's what it will take to destroy the disease of luciferianism... It's been fun... Goodbye.

One day you think you know, next day you know you don’t know anything.

I think the universe is closer to 27 billion years old . I am no scientist , but just a gut feeling . The jwt is opening up more of our present universe and what is showing , seems to me , to be proof of the older model .

I have never believed, that the universe had a beginning. The universe is moving, but there was never a starting point and there will never be an ending point.

Specialists say that the universe has 13.8 billion years old with a margin of error of only 21 million ok? but when it comes to Methuselah star they have a margin of 0.8 billion. Don't you think something is wrong !?

Wow 27 billion years old 😳 that's astonishing still a long time.

@bryanx0317

8 ай бұрын

Actually.... if the universe could possibly survive trillions of years, it's not that old.

@blacklyfe5543

8 ай бұрын

@@bryanx0317 it is that old

If you look at curves fit to known redshifts, it looks like Tired Light Theory fits better than when TLT is supplemented by the (much more difficult to swallow) CCC. Occam's Razor AND the fit both favor leaving CCC out.

@taylan3363

10 ай бұрын

This isn’t remotely true, and every single empirical prediction that Tired Light has made has been proven wrong. Glad you aren’t a scientist!

@noneedtoknow5315

9 ай бұрын

YAAAYYYY SMART PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!

We should just accept that we don't really know anything.

Let's all just slow down. There is a lot of disputes with the paper.

So interesting! Now, I’m a monkey. Not an educated scientist. My IQ is probably around the average. Still I have always wondered if not only our methods to measure things are off, we also still don’t understand the nature of time itself.

@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman

10 ай бұрын

But time's a concept

@KMRB951

10 ай бұрын

@@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman there are interesting theories about time. The one that I find cool is the time being the fourth dimension!

@noneedtoknow5315

9 ай бұрын

@@KMRB951 our perception of time is us moving through the fourth dimension and our choices are the direction we point ourselves within that stream. (Although concensus says it's more like a whirlpool)

@KMRB951

9 ай бұрын

@@noneedtoknow5315 sounds pretty logical actually 👍

@tyrone6820

7 ай бұрын

YOU don’t understand the nature of time. Not “we”

If the universe expands faster and faster, doesn't it mean it's also gets older and older?

@blacklyfe5543

9 ай бұрын

Yup

@adrian-db3ml

9 ай бұрын

Where the universe is expend

@vicentequinata7915

8 ай бұрын

The question is what is the universe expanding into?

Once we finally figure out that Billions of Light Years ✨️ = quadrillions of actual 🌎 years!

Space is not empty. Light traveling for billions of years will repeatedly encounter atoms and subatomic particles. Each time it will lose energy. Is it so hard to believe that it’s possible?

I don't think we'll know, or truly be able to get there until we master light-speed travel. I realize that would still be way too slow (13.8 or 26.8 billion years) to get to that edge we seek, but with physical testing at the speed of light we'll better understand the physical properties of light itself.

@MusingsFromTheJohn00

7 ай бұрын

When we can perform coordinated experiments from the outer edges of the Milky Way Galaxy along at least 8 points if not more, then we will be able to better answer this question. So, wait another few hundred thousand years.

@hellfire66683

7 ай бұрын

Light speed travel is actually very slow when you look at the distance between interstellar objects like between galaxies.

@Sillyworld82

7 ай бұрын

@hellfire66683 I guess what I was trying to infer was, if we could travel at light speed physically, then maybe we could work out whether you could break that threshold or not.

@MusingsFromTheJohn00

7 ай бұрын

This should really be called the speed of causality not the speed of light, in my opinion. There is no solid evidence we will be able to go faster than that, though there are claims around quantum entanglement, but since it has yet been shown to be able to be used to transmit information, so the whole hypothesis around quantum entanglement may be wrong. What we will be able to do is to move human minds out of their existing brains and into new custom designed and grown brains. What that means is that we will (1) be able to live open ended life spans and (2) transmit our minds between colonized star systems at lightspeed. We will also be able to sling streams of microscopic colonizer ships at near light speed to colonize new star systems for the first time where some number of human minds would be distributed within the colonizing stream. So, we will colonize the galaxy and beyond over the next few hundred thousand years, but we will likely still have to deal with the massive time delay in communication which we will only manage thanks to being able to live open ended life spans.

If we can see 93 billion light years in all directions around us then shouldn't the universe be just as old if not older? Perhaps the universe is a timeless, shapeless entity.

The universe is ageless.. it's always been here. The big bang is a crock in order to explain what we don't know, and will never know

@blacklyfe5543

9 ай бұрын

Wrong if the universe is ageless than it wouldn't be expanding because of dark energy so this disproves your statement

@noneedtoknow5315

9 ай бұрын

@@blacklyfe5543 what if it isn't? What if "tired light" turns out to be more correct? How fast would matter have to travel to get out to 13.8 billion light years distance before emitting the light that takes 13.8 billion years to get BACK to us?!?!? Did all these galaxies fly out of the big bang travelling AT the speed of light for 13.8 billion years to suddenly almost STOP INSTANTLY so the light emitted isn't redshifted to E.L.F. so that we can see light 13.8 billion years later that is only redshifted by less than 1%?!?!? Or does it make more sense that mass did NOT travel at the speed of light for 13.8 billion years and then suddenly instantly decelerate to less than 1% of that speed?!?!? I understand expansion, and the concept that what we see as 14 billion light years is supposedly 70 billion light years away now and WAS 14 billion light years away 14 billion years ago, but at 68 METERS of expansion per every 3.2 LIGHT YEARS, I think the math OBVIOUSLY contradicts itself from the 2 mathematical vectors of operation!.... Try again.

08:44. "The current understandings show that the Universe Is Infinite." !?! Impossible. We never would have arrived at our current place in time. The big bang never would have happened. You couldn't go back in time to the Big Bang if the Universe is infinite because it's infinitely back in time. Thus you could never arrive at a current place in time because it is infinitely forward in time. By simple logic, for me anyway, something which is infinite never could by definition have a beginning. I believe I learned this in my high school Algebra class when we talked about number lines and the set of all numbers. So, if the Big Bang is true, the universe isn't infinite.

@Cosmo_P0litan

7 ай бұрын

And perhaps time is just our perception..., it may behave differently and or perhaps is not real at all.

You forgot the 'if' in. ' What happens if he's right? '. 😅 Cool video though! I think it's a leap for now, but then again, stranger things have happened.

@officialinterstellarnews

10 ай бұрын

Haha I know. I missed it in the edit. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Noticed it after it went up. Hurts my soul. I agree. It’s a big leap. Can’t imagine it would hold up.

What is the universe expanding into?

27 billion years old and Earth is the only known planet with life. That’s scary 😟

@VivBrodock

10 ай бұрын

first of all, probably not 27 billion years the research hasn't been replicated yet so it's no where near proven enough to be assumed over the old estimate. second, entirely expected, if we assume that earth is not unique and life would develop in other places why would we then assume that earth is unique and developed life *after* other places. a far more likely explanation is that there are countless other civilizations wondering if they're alone in the universe too. honestly, given humanities penchant for colonization it's probably good that we haven't seen evidence of spacefaring civilization, because let me tell you, civilizations making contact with technologically superior civilizations doesn't usually go well, just ask a Taino person, oh wait, the Spanish fucking genocided them.

@carljahnson609

10 ай бұрын

Theres a reason for that you know what i mean

@curious1053

10 ай бұрын

@@carljahnson609Brahma willed it so

@darkone292

9 ай бұрын

There’s other life out there. It’s just to far for us to see

i personally think that the univwrse might be older than 27 billions years old but yk im just a random highschooler and have weird but possible thoughts abt the universe

Great, all the time I have no access to has just been doubled.

We cannot comprehend how old the universe really is

Strange thought, say it became so hot during creation light was moving ever so slightly faster. The universe being even younger than what is considered.

How do you know it 27 billion years old?

To "know" the universe is this old, and not think that there were civilizations on this planet repeatedly for probwbly millions of years before us, is the height of "slowed engine ignition timing". 😊

Later it will be 54 billion years old.

Lets see, how about we add 26.7 and 13.7 and get 40.4? Just to be abstract and to pull a number out of thin air. I wouldn't be surprised if the universe is 26-27 billion years old or even older. What about the next more advanced telescope and future technology that is able to look back even more and more distance?

@P2Chill

10 ай бұрын

The James Webb space telescope can look back to when the universe was still a dense hot plasma soup and therefore opaque (meaning no light can get through, at all, not even infrared like what the JWST uses), so we've pretty much reached the limit of how far we can peer back unless we come up with a new way of making observations that doesn't involve light, which at this moment we are (still) unable to achieve, I think. So using visible light we're at the limit of how far back we will ever be able to see I'm fairly certain. Hopefully we'll find some other way to make observations in that early opaque stage of the universe though!

@301Pont

10 ай бұрын

@@P2Chill Yes! Absolutely!

@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman

10 ай бұрын

​@@P2Chill🤔

I was really hoping the video would slip in a Doctor Who reference. "Homo sapiens! What an inventive, invincible species!" -the Doctor (played by the wonderfully awesome Tom Baker).

@officialinterstellarnews

10 ай бұрын

I have made a few Doctor Who references here and there in my Shorts, but never in a long form. I think I’ll change that going forward

@DANGERMAN-oo5my

10 ай бұрын

@@officialinterstellarnews You deserve a whopping bag of Jelly Babies for that.

If we watch out the distance of the microwave background frequency , we can estimate that's is much more old than the traditional measurement scientific proposal , there are some galaxies that's are 90 billion light years away from milk away ...

@tralt135

10 ай бұрын

Distances aren't indicative of the age of the universe because of the expansion of space. Expansion of space is cumulative over the distance between two points and across very large distances, space can be expanding faster than the speed of light. That doesn't contradict anything we understand about physics. What it does mean is that those extremely far away objects have long since crossed the point of no return, and no matter how fast we travel we'll never reach them. They'll fade forever until there's no trace of them in the sky anymore.

Wow! I feel like everything I’m learning about the universe has been wrong! 🚀

@officialinterstellarnews

10 ай бұрын

As we learn more, we learn more! We’ll see if this research holds up after peer review. 🚀

Can you imagine if we called people Ether deniers and mocked anyone who questioned or didn’t believe in a universal ether? Funny how ridiculous it sounds when it’s not what we believe. There’s a place for that level of pettiness in other types of content, but educational content like this should be encouraging people to learn and showing them why/how they might be misunderstanding something.

How can you put an age on something infinite. Space has always been there and will always be there. There's no beginning or end. There's only matter that was created within the space that has a time it was created and a death of the creation and then it's reformed into something else. Like energy doesn't disappear it just gets reformed into something else.

We only estimate what we can see. If space never ends time means nothing

Next time we will find out the universe is 50 billion years old. The point is that the Big Bang theory is wrong and we need some basic understanding of space that we currently don’t know

Here’s a a question: What if not all of the Universe is the same age?

Twas known before Web that the universe must of necessity be infinite ♾️. Divine Nature.

Then what exist beyond?

... or is the universe really ageless, going through cycles, and infinitely old?

It always existed and universe is more bigger than we humans think

this is crazy!

6:08 mans pants are never coming off

With the technology we have today that is our best estimate

It's is very simple it was a big bang but he didn't create universe or spacetime because spacetime was already there eternal. And big bangs happens all the time.

I always think to myself, suuure we know all this mystical information without a doubt (the way most scientist and people act) within the past 200 years.. yeah … right

Several years from now, this estimate will also be wrong.

Nobody knows and Nobody will know what is the universe age. Period.

Nearest universe to us is 55.9 Trillion yrs old? (Theory)

It’s actually timeless, deathless, and ageless.

I knew it !

Next thing you know pluto will be a planet again

your 'short' on my home page talks about the 'shape' of the universe. Why bother guessing? Why not explore the obvious? The universe does not have a beginning or an end in time or size. It is not so many billions of years old, it is the definition of infinite.

until we know the exact edge of the universe the age dont matter one bit.

What happens hes right? What happens if hes right you mean?

"... وما أوتيتم من العلم إلا قليلا" آية 85 - سورة الإسراء

What if the James web telescope is pointed at the greatatracter

And the galaxy might not be expanding.... Galaxy can be viewed as flowing or just circling

I think Gupta is correct, yes, the universe is older than we thought, and we have to examine more closely other particles and light that we haven’t been able to before, when the Carl Sagan telescope and other telescopes are launched and used in conjunction with each other so we can have a better view of what we are looking at and don’t see with the naked eye or other telescopes to this day🔭🔬🔮🚀🛸🛰

"Big Bang Denier"? Really?

I think. Time slows with expansion

Woah

26.7 million old universe is a bad joke, age of the universe is not a scientific question, because time has no physical existence

Simple fact! We have no way of knowing the speed or behaviour photons through intergalactic space....... FACT

Time does not exist. Scientists , physicists always want to measure everything. The Universe is not just the material observable there is a huge part of it which is energy. Everything is explained in Yoga. The cycles. God. What are we. We are all one. Everything is unified. Go to Yoga you will find the answers.

there is no dark matter, but there is anti matter with anti gravity :D

The answer to life the universe and everything else is 42

It’s a conceit to ever say we know how it all works. I think our sun could die tomorrow. It could also literally be alive like we are.

Sounds good to me

Can we stop calling people “deniers” every time they don’t agree with something commonly believed to be true. It’s nothing more than a pejorative term to discourage people from thinking something different from ourselves. I spent a few years debating flat earthers, I know it can be annoying when people don’t believe a provable fact for dumb reasons, but that doesn’t mean anyone who disagrees is automatically a denier.

It’s very old and wise

We are still wrong. In hinduism, We believe Universe is 3.10 trillion years old.😅😎

Yeah.. a second matter .. a millionth of a second matter.... billions of any million million million billions of #. Keep going

The Universe is beyond Billions of years old! It's INFINITE! There is NO TIME allotted to it! Especially in how limited we as humans perceive time/reality! There was NEVER A BIG BANG either!! There is no beginning, middle or end to INFINITY! Like DUH! 🙄🤣👽🛸🛸🛸

We don’t even know how old the modern human species is lol. Smh humans

Can’t believe this isn’t bigger news !

@mendelgrant2129

10 ай бұрын

I saw this paper (I assume it's the same based on the fluctuating field component) reported differently a few days ago. The article focused on the feature that if this new theory is correct, the universe isn't actually expanding, and there's no need for dark energy (or dark matter?). I think a theory this radical has so many implications that there are a million paradigm-shattering implications. So maybe you've seen this reported a few times already, just from different angles.

@P2Chill

10 ай бұрын

Simple. Because it's far from verified.

First like and view

@officialinterstellarnews

10 ай бұрын

🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 Appreciate you!

I believe Goûta.

Truth is, you have no idea, so tell the truth.

🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

it's just a total guess

The credibility of such research is at the bottom of the chart as it is built upon many hypothetical and daring theses. Tired Light is a mechanism that was created as an alternative to the current system we use, yet there weren't any observations that matched what the theory offered. Sorry, but the chances of our universe doubling in age is near zero.

I think theories are just that…theories.

@blacklyfe5543

9 ай бұрын

Nope they are experiments that are based off of facts!

Yes to tell this this is pertaining to Big bang this is called astroid or stone or seal seventh seal and the name of this is as 11 12 13 14 or 2 3 4 5 this is name of Jesus as 1 77 1 7 6 as 11. -. 13. 14 this is 4th seal or earth before it was six seals each one is having 4 parts up 3 middle Earth down 3 as 3x4= 12 and 3x4= 12 total 24 elders singing then the seventh appeard as Jesus or earth this is called beginning of the Earth. In that 11+14 =25 and 2+5= 7 and 12+ 13=25 and 2+5=7 so left 7 and right 7 called 27 or 14 and 77 and also 49. And the formation of the Earth ( Job 38 Chap 38: 4-9 ) and this as we thought only particles and waves are not there but the nature stars angels are singing and to know about this waves these are the cods in Indian language these are called GURUVU and LAGUVU with this the poem will write and this is called SEESA poem in this 1. 1. 1 write side and 1 1 1 left side laguvus and in 3 there are 3 guruvus as UUU and the middle the earth also GURUVU like down side in this many secrets are there thanks

Lets just agree to disagree and keep searching. Science is never settled and it's done by humans that make mistakes.

Time dont even exist

I wasnt wrong, you science bro's were wrong

You lost me when you wrote ..."universes age"