No panic. No nonsense. All parties laser-focused. This level of professionalism is a credit to both ATC and commercial pilots.

That happened to me several times... but I flew the MD11 for FedEx with 3 generators, and, like Meatloaf, said "two out of three ain't bad."

@ArtyI

2 жыл бұрын

That's not a problem. I assume the MD11 could also run off of a single source of power, but that creates a single point of failure which you don't want in the sky

@chrismair8161

2 жыл бұрын

the Commuter flight and lay over for me going to Chicago got hit by lightning right beside my window seat. The Black Woman beside me tried to crush my hand. I simply looked at her and said. (If there was a hole in this Airplane? We would have been a deck of cards at 400 MPH and 33 Thousand feet. We are Good.) Warmest hug when on the ground. Moms. I will find a way to have the SUN rise in the West for just You.

@someguy4915

2 жыл бұрын

You just straight copy-pasted someone else's comment...

@alphasiera1757

2 жыл бұрын

Wow you still fly md11, wonder how long it will be in service since it has a high jet gas consumption

@AlphaGametauri

2 жыл бұрын

@@alphasiera1757 FedEx and UPS doesn't plan to retire their MC-10's or MD-11's anytime soon, their reasoning is it's cheaper to maintain and fuel a more expensive to run jet like them, then it is to buy brand new jets such as the 787 or A350, and have to change up their maintainence departments and such

On the 1983 day of my Private Pilot check-ride in a C-150, I left my check-ride airport as the sun was going over the horizon. I had a 40 minute flight from Rutherford County, NC airport back to my home base in Boone, NC. (at that time) an unlighted grass strip in the Appalachian Mountains. About halfway home I had a complete electrical failure... mind you now, I'm a rookie w/ a dripping wet PP license. I got back and the one street light at the tie-down corner of the airport was my only light. I held my flashlight in my mouth and kept it focused on the airspeed indicator, remembering that my flaps don't work, kept my speed up about 5 kts higher than usual and made an uneventful landing. I taxied back to tiedown, an some of the other plane owners were there and quizzed me about my landing lights and nav lights being out. I got a commendation from them all. 25 years later, it happened again in a Piper Archer (At least I had flaps) that I was ferrying back from maintenance at night. Now, as an Instructor, I "overemphasize" the importance of having a small flashlight at hand (not in a bag), and perhaps a portable navigator of some type if going to far reaching destinations. AND... when things go wrong... JUST FLY THE PLANE!!!

@cefb8923

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah never occured to me.. Cessna electric flaps.. rather have the J-bar flaps.

When ATC and an emergency aircraft "become as one" professionalism at its very best all round

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

You love to see that synergy.

@1-danewraith804

2 жыл бұрын

I'm a 30 year retired Air Traffic Controller ~ military and civilian. You just typed a beautiful truth. < - - - -❤

I had this exact same thing happen. It’s not an “emergency” in the manner that most may think. Everything on the jet is working normally and there is no significant degradation of capability, unless the weather is very, very bad. If the last generator were to quit, that becomes a very significant problem, and most jets like this one (I drive this same jet) have less than 30 minutes to get on the ground. When it happened to me, I was over Memphis, during the FedEx busy time. There were no issues at all working in with traffic. Again, all a “precautionary landing”. Declaring an emergency does two major things. Alerts ATC there is an issue and special services are being requested. It gives the Captain legal authority to do what he needs to in order to get on the ground. For the crew, that approach and landing were as normal as all the others they have done.

@someguy4915

2 жыл бұрын

To be fair, does't the captain always have legal authority (and the responsibility) to ensure the safety of the aircraft and those aboard it? If ATC tells a non-emergency aircraft to do a barrel-roll the captain would most likely not attempt it despite not having declared an emergency :P

@kilianortmann9979

2 жыл бұрын

Im not sure how it is on the 767, maybe you can confirm, but isn't the Ram Air turbine also producing some electricity.

@TwinShards

2 жыл бұрын

"If the last generator were to quit, that becomes a very significant problem, and most jets like this one (I drive this same jet) have less than 30 minutes to get on the ground." I guess if this were to happen, it would be to completely turn off electrical power and glide as far as possible util the altitude is too low to be "safe" then use those ~30minutes left

@schwags1969

2 жыл бұрын

Not to be picky or rude but, don't you fly an airplane?

@Notimp0rtant523

2 жыл бұрын

You declare the emergency to prevent the emergency. And that’s why aviation is the safest mode of transit in the world.

I have zero interest in aviation but you've made these videos interesting and informative enough to keep me on a binge of them. Bravo

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you're enjoying the videos!

@derp8575

Жыл бұрын

One of us. One of us. One of us.

@chofyam3466

Жыл бұрын

Same

Coming out of Lisbon one day we had the left generator go on vacation (quite). The APU was fine until the Azores, then the APU also went on Vacation(quite), later found a gasket on the oil cap was damaged,thus APU oil was blown over board. We declared an emergency and landed in the Azores. Wonderful place, glad to visit the islands. We were flying a 757.

@Zaluskowsky

2 жыл бұрын

so you went on vacation too ^^ (quite)

Great job with your use of different fonts to convey waypoints, frequencies, etc.. I also really like your voiceovers at the beginning. You’ve instantly become my favorite ATC channel.

@AirTrafficVisualised

Жыл бұрын

Thanks very much!

Really nice presentation - I like how you styled the greyed out subtitles for the transmission that was lost. I also really appreciate not cutting out audio to sensationalise the emergency like other channels do!

@duzehalo

2 жыл бұрын

I agree, it was a pleasure to watch

that's amazing, the emergency hardly caused any disruption to the rest of the traffic. two flights got in ahead of them and it sounds like the next one behind them didn't have to go around either.

Imagine running on single source power and still having the presence of mind to wish everyone good morning.

@MultiChrisjb

2 жыл бұрын

Hopefully it doesn't happen so often that they're use to it... lol

Well done on all parts; Crew and ATC.

Pilot so calm, good training.

What made it so interesting for me was being able to follow it on the map .

Well done Crew! Excellent visualisation!

I've seen videos from several ATC channels. The way you present everything is by far the best. BY FAR.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks very much!

The atc guys handled that amazingly! great job!

Pilots always amaze me with their ability to keep cool and calm during just about any emergency. That's why they're pilots: you want a level head in the cockpit if/when things go wrong. Were it me, I'd strap on a parachute and bail out. Which is why you do not want ME as your pilot!

@cefb8923

2 жыл бұрын

Well it wasn't a real, real emergency.. just if that last generator failed then you've got a real problem.

These are so much better than the VASAviation videos.

Way to go ATC for the ballet @5:19 - gorgeous congruence, even with one in an emergency state - Hats off! (and yes, as someone mentioned pucker factor 8...mercy)

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Not what you want to deal with at the end of your night shift, but they were ready!

Man… PERFECT video. I love your editing style and all the information you give on screen. I wouldn’t change a thing. Keep it up!

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks very much for the kind comment! 😊

@cubs197

2 жыл бұрын

@@AirTrafficVisualised Of course! You’ve got a new sub

The visual is very well done on every aspect in this video. Good job!

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Merci beaucoup!

its also amazing to hear how calm they are in these situations.

@BeingMe23

2 жыл бұрын

You can thank the Flight Simulators.

@jg-7780

2 жыл бұрын

They weren’t really in immediate danger, so long as the remaining electric source continued to work. It’s just not considered a safe idea to run with just one layer of redundancy, hence the emergency landing.

@d1sturb3d119

2 жыл бұрын

It is, necessary. In all formats of training, staying calm is key. Doing enough training allows you to stay calm. Little to no training is when panic sets in. Being calm is absolutely paramount to assess the situation

Thank you for the visualizations, makes it easier for people like me to understand what the codes means!

What a nice way to display all this.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@thepurpleufo

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, it was *great*!!!

Excellent pilot control with cool calm professionalism. 👍

So calm.

What a great concept for a channel. This is an excellent way to present various incidents from a unique perspective.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks very much, glad you enjoyed the video!

Great video, glad worked out good and landed safely ✈️💯🤜🤛

Interesting. Calm and smooth.

My first time watching your channel, outstanding graphics, audio and clarity.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Cheers Dan, glad you enjoyed the video!

Pucker factor 8 on that one. I went NORDO when electrical system failed in a C172 (heavy, lol) in the middle of a Class B. I managed to call the tower on my cell phone and got clearance to land. Good thing that plane had slick mags.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your experience! Regardless of the size of the plane, when systems start failing it's a sub-optimal day for the pilot(s)!

@elmin2323

2 жыл бұрын

No issue the plane still has 1 power source plus 3 hydraulic generators

@amandaklapp1171

2 жыл бұрын

...and batteries.

@donjet5371

2 жыл бұрын

@@elmin2323 Nope, no HDGs.

@elmin2323

2 жыл бұрын

@@donjet5371 ok arm chair expert

Hi, this is when professionals handle the situation. Excellent work, guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Excellent Job on all Parties

So calm!

Good management! Well done!

I love a happy ending so glad they made it back safe ♥️🙏🏽

Scary stuff right there!! Glad they were able to return and safely land!! Kudos!! Love the visualizations, ATVisualized!! 👍✈✈👍

@elmin2323

2 жыл бұрын

Nothing scary about it

@brunoais

2 жыл бұрын

This one wasn't scary. It was just "better land in a good airport than the other power source failing and then being in a real issue"

Scary stuff!! Glad all ok!

I wouldn't have guessed that some 767s don't have APU. Very nice presentation here, especially the captions. They are much more accurate than vas aviation.

@gitbse

Жыл бұрын

They 100% have APUs. It however can be mel'd, meaning they can still fly with it inoperative.

Amazing video, great graphs and illustration.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks, really pleased people are enjoying this one.

New to channel. I like your visuals compared to other channels. Keep up the good work.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks, will do!

Anytime I visit SoCal I go to LAX and watch the airliners come and go.

These visuals are amazing

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks very much, glad you liked the video!

@atilamacko9792

Жыл бұрын

@@AirTrafficVisualised tatics and skill

After the Hudson 737 landing, it's amazing to me that they continue allowing planes to fly with a non-working APU. Captain Sully's starting the APU was credited as the #1 technical thing that saved them, as it restored their electrical power even with all engines out. A broken APU should be a non-airworthy state.

@ArmyofSeaturtles

2 жыл бұрын

APU can be deferred as long as 2 IDG are operational. also etops certified aircraft will have its etops status downgraded. fun fact the 747 apu is incapable of stating in flight.

@RLTtizME

2 жыл бұрын

It was an Airbus.

@tomstravels520

2 жыл бұрын

But how many times do aircraft have dual engine failures? The answer is almost never. There are far for planes flying with a broken APU than aircraft that have had dual engine flameout

@itheseacow7590

2 жыл бұрын

There's a reason the ram air turbine exists

@jaysmith1408

2 жыл бұрын

@@ArmyofSeaturtles -400 and -800 can’t, but 1-3 can

All the wait and YOU twits get me on a Defective Airplane. great!

@harveywilde6781

2 жыл бұрын

All the wait? You? Me?

Great job!

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

Great graphics!

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you very much!

When this happened to me I installed the spare APU...added thrust adjusters on both wings...

Subscribed!

Good content

Had that happen to me several times... but I flew the MD11 for FedEx, with 3 generators, and like Meatloaf said "two out of three ain't bad".

@Ces999919822

2 жыл бұрын

MD-11 has 4 generators. 3 engines plus the APU.

@ChrisC7498_

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ces999919822 two out of four ain't bad?

@Ces999919822

2 жыл бұрын

@@ChrisC7498_ not real good and not real bad. Better than the 76 being down to 1 gen.

I love a happy ending!

ah so this is why my pkg was delayed by 1 day :D

Noted the addition of "Emergency aircraft" onto the new radio contact with approach. We all know that this information has been lost during handoff between controllers.

@nemo227

2 жыл бұрын

I didn't hear it but somewhere on this flight I think the pilots had switched to the emergency squawk code in which case any controller can see their emergency status on their screens.

@TianarTruegard

2 жыл бұрын

@@nemo227 One thing I didn't notice, they weren't told to enter an emergency squawk code on their transponder.

@nemo227

2 жыл бұрын

@@TianarTruegard I didn't hear it either but the video was likely edited before it was posted. I used to listen to ATC in the Monterey Bay area (California) pretty much every day. I heard normal traffic every day but a few times I'd catch something unusual. I could also pick up ATC of planes talking to Oakland Center. One thing that stuck in my memory was that airline pilots would sometime be told to "Delete the Boulder (speed) restriction" and the pilots often confirmed with "Drop the rock" but it took me a while to understand the slang. Back in the seventies I was fortunate to be able to visit with controllers in Palo Alto, Salinas, Monterey, and El Cajon. I don't know if that's still possible.

I wonder if the pilot alerted all the nervous Amazon Prime customers while landing. "This is your delivery driver speaking..."

No turbulence at all. 💝

Good video, new sub. Thanks

23k subscribers? This channel is going to boom in a few weeks.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

It'd be nice, but ATV's been around for nearly seven years so I'm not holding my breath! 😁

@FrancoCastro

2 жыл бұрын

@@AirTrafficVisualised yes but you had been blessed by the KZread algorithm.

Phone notification: Your package is on the way, but its running late

That pilot sounded pretty calm. Imagine reporting you have three "souls" on board. That would freak me out if I had to utter those words.

@camila8031

2 жыл бұрын

everytime they have an emergency they have to tell how many souls on board in case they need ground assistance it's pretty much procedure not necessarily bc it's something really bad

My concern in these incidents, where I understand ATC still want to get other planes in, but if one of the planes they’re squeezing in before the emergency aircraft has an issue on the runway, that runway is now no longer available to the emergency aircraft and god knows what problems that could cause in certain emergencies. Arguably in some emergencies the pilots could decide that if the aircraft ahead (which had no problems prior to landing) has had an issue at the end of the runway but is still on it, but they haven’t got an option to go around, that the best option is to go against ATC and land on that runway despite there being another aircraft on it at the end. Obviously this wouldn’t work if the other aircraft is well within the normal landing distances. But if you’ve got no engines, a fire or whatever, it’s better to get down and perhaps do a runway excursion to avoid the problem aircraft ahead or have a collision with it, than try go around and fall out of the sky. But again, brings back the Russian roulette of hoping all aircraft you squeeze in perfect their landings and don’t have any issues or delays on landing. Obviously in this case it wasn’t necessarily AS time critical as a fire/no engines (still urgent), and they could’ve gone around and likely found an alternative landing, but still seems risky. I would want to preserve that runway when the emergency aircraft is about to begin their approach. But again, they have to balance the logistics of the airport and getting other aircraft down and not having other emergencies in the way of emergency fuel being declared and so on. I think in the serious outcomes the ATC should just advise the wait is a minimum of x time based on how long it’ll take the emergency aircraft to get from wherever they are and until landing, and that aircraft can decide whether they can hold for that long or divert.

@ndbiet

2 жыл бұрын

It seem the pilot still have control and has not declare a Mayday and quite calm so it is reasonable why ATC allow this to happen

@TianarTruegard

2 жыл бұрын

@@ndbiet They did declare an emergency (mayday). Depending on the aircraft, complete electrical failure could leave them unable to control the aircraft and crash at worst, or unable to communicate at best. Granted, they still had 1 generator operational and there are batteries on aircraft as well, but those only last a few minutes if all generators fail. If a pilot declares an emergency ((assuming its legitimate)), ATC is supposed to give them priority, period. It could have gotten rather messy if that runway wasn't clear for the emergency aircraft when they landed.

@georgeolina3414

2 жыл бұрын

@@TianarTruegard I agree! If one of those two aircraft didn't clear the runway on time it would had caused the distressed airplane to go-around...instead ATC decided to ask the following aircraft to go-around...

@HotRodsnHueys

2 жыл бұрын

This is one of those things where something has to happen unfortunately. Where this is a major factor in a large incident, enough so that the protocol will change. As sad as that sounds, aviation history proves all the strict rules we already have are written in blood.

@Colaeroimages

2 жыл бұрын

It really baffled me when they turned back and there were two aircraft ahead of them in quite a tight sequence, and actually asking them to reduce speed. Emergency means emergency, no matter the kind...

Great call by the pilots. You lose two of three electric generation, that’s a no go. Great ATC handling.

Things went sideways close to the same spot where Alaska 261 went down in Jan. 2000.

@derek20la

2 жыл бұрын

Not so much sideways, more like inverted.

Dec '78 on Delta TriStar from W. Palm Beach on ATL to ATL leg via DTW, O'hare, Cleveland, Philly, directed to JFK but rejected for Marrietta, GA where ran outta gas, kicked RAT out gliding back to ATL. They let us land 1st, Capt parked at open AMR gate saying, "Welcome to Atlanta...again!" Liner in Detroit had crashed in front us sliding sideways until gear crushed all due to ice storm paralyzing USA!. Capt USAF Reserve!

I know the APU isn't "necessary" for flying the airplane, and I seem to recall other incidents when a non-functioning APU proved to be a problem. It's like belt and suspenders, and if both straps of your suspenders fail, you really need that belt. I think I'd consider the APU a necessity.

Thee Souls onboard.. Jeez

Likely due to maintenance oversight to keep amazon profits high.

Even for cargo I think a RAT to drop for aux power should be implemented by carriers and the Pilots Union could get it done.

@sean.spotting

2 жыл бұрын

Completely agree with you

@daniellamb7828

2 жыл бұрын

All of Amazons 767s have RATs

I guess all the saving money on not repairing the apu didn't playoff. Nice job by the crew!

@harveywilde6781

2 жыл бұрын

The APU is operable. Just for some reason it wont starts (normally the APU are shut off after the engines had started).

I'm always shocked at how many professional pilots do not use proper terminology when declaring an emergency. The FAA says: EMERGENCY DETERMINATIONS An emergency can be either a Distress or an Urgency condition as defined in the “Pilot/Controller Glossary.” A pilot who encounters a Distress condition should declare an emergency by beginning the initial communication with the word “Mayday,” preferably repeated three times. For an Urgency condition, the word “Pan‐Pan” should be used in the same manner. If the words “Mayday” or “Pan-Pan” are not used but you believe an emergency or an urgent situation exists, handle it as though it were an emergency.

@dougnixon6464

2 жыл бұрын

if the pilot started by saying Mayday first thing, he wouldn't have had to subtle ask ATC to hurry up for a return heading "ahhhh, so can we expect to come back on 6s or 7s?" LOL

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

It's quite peculiar, American (that is the country, not the airline) crews seem very reticent to use the word "mayday", much preferring the nomenclature "we'd like to declare an emergency". Crews in other parts of the world (including similar Anglophone countries like the UK and Australia) exhibit no such reluctance - if you look at this video in Australia, the crew immediately declare a mayday: kzread.info/dash/bejne/g6VlqcOHj5TIXZc.html I'd be interested to hear from pilots what they think the difference might be.

@khaosai

2 жыл бұрын

@@AirTrafficVisualised The difference being no more than poor RT standards on display on a daily basis by US pilots. This was evident throughout the departure process prior to declaring an emergency.

@2660016A

2 жыл бұрын

Beat me to it! Lazy, inefficient RT!

@virginiaviola5097

2 жыл бұрын

He had to call twice. If he’d started with a pan pan or a mayday he’d have had immediate attention. Seconds matter in aviation

God damn: verify info Lima, crossing intersection with altitude, and cleared to land. Bruh, we got an emergency lol

Am I the only one who's never seen runway's running in opposing directions operational at the same time like that?

Always wonder why you’d want to return to a busy INTL airport like LAX in an emergency, when Point Mugu was right there to the northeast. I guess company has resources there, mechanics and the like.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

Keep in mind that this was at 5am local time - the aircraft you see on the display represents the total traffic into and out of LAX at the time.

@blusheep2

2 жыл бұрын

Magu was below them 19000 feet. ATC would have had to vector them out quite a ways to give them time to descend, so Magu isn't really a more efficient airport to land at, not to mention its military airfield which isn't set up for commercial airliners and passengers. Generally pilots will opt for the large airport which has longer runways, company support and good fire and rescue. There are time and no-time emergencies. A fire would be a no-time emergency. You get it on the ground as soon as you can. This electrical problem was not a no-time emergency.

I'm spoiled flying the the queen with 4 generators.

If there was only a way to declare an emergency using only a few words, while being absolutely clear what's your problem and intentions.

@dalydegagne1839

Жыл бұрын

Actually there is - either pan pan or mayday. It seems that Canadian pilots are less likely to have the same reluctance to use these terms as American pilots have.

Yes, land and bring me my package!!! Dont let it go down!!!

It's not the first problem that kills you.

There's more to prime, a truckload more.

How do you do it. Subbed btw.

I always don't like how they ask for number of "souls" on board. Always makes it ominous.

Did the crew order a new generator and APU on Arizona prime on the way back to the airport?

Seems a bit unusual to me to have the north part of the airport landing EB and the south field departing WB. Nice display, though.

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

This occurred at about 5 am local time, so the airport isn't particularly busy, and the weather was fair. For noise abatement, they depart and arrive over the ocean.

So THAT'S why my package was delayed!

All's well that ends well but if the outcome was different the question would have been why didn't the pilot or ATC suggest landing at Naval Air Station Fort Mugu. ATC should transfer every emergency to a dedicated person trained in CRM.

@HEDGE1011

2 жыл бұрын

Why? If there’s an onboard fire or some such sure, but why would you go to an unfamiliar field at night that you likely don’t have charts for and is probably not in the aircraft database? Was Mugu open? What was their CFR status? Why not just go back to LAX which has multiple runways, all the CFR, the pilots are familiar with it, and they have support there? This was the supremely logical decision.

Well done FedEx crew, from a retired United pilot. Excellent job declaring an emergency. Many pilots just won’t do that. Very professional conduct. I flew the B-767-300 for 15 years. One dark and low IFR night I pushed back from the gate at Newark on my way to Istanbul, Turkey. After starting both engines, the right generator failed. Back at the gate I was told it would take several hours to change the generator but that it could be deferred because I could use the APU as a second generator. That meant flying across the North Atlantic at night on 2 generators. I refused to do that saying that if I lost the left engine, or the APU failed, I would be down to one generator and possibly one engine at night and 3 hours from land. I refused to take the airplane and the flight was canceled. Good captains play a game called “ What if?”, while bad ones play “ I hope not”. But I would have taken it on two generators as this FedEx crew did on a domestic flight. Well done again to these FedEx pilots!

Would they use the Ram Air Turbine if they lost the last generator?

Roger that, red dog. Goldilocks is in the house and we are go for launch, 1917, heavy 😂

„Have a Great flight“ lmfao

Couldn't they land at the Naval Air Station? They were right there.

I don't know how it is for commercial aviation but I feel like the apu should be mandatory to be working 100% specifically for reasons like this

I can't believe how many armchair experts here apparently think LAX has only 1 runway. It's not exactly a grass strip out in the countryside. There are 4 parallel runways eastbound and this pilot chose 6R, so the other traffic were kept on the other runways. Its not like he was coming in wing a wing blown off and flames shooting out of his engines! The other traffic was miles ahead or behind him anyway, does everyone here understand the little airplane symbols in this graphic aren't actual size?

@philduoos2961

2 жыл бұрын

I haven't been on a plane in quite awhile. Towards the end with the planes all still on approach (same runway as far as I can tell?) I figured I would watch the clock and see how far apart they were upon landing. I figured maybe 15 minutes. It was about 3 to 4 minutes between landings - much closer than I expected! (Pretty impressive). The plane after the emergency plane was told to be ready to go around in case the plane had problems.

@davidhughes3337

Жыл бұрын

@@philduoos2961 - a lot more regularly at Heathrow. 40 to 45 and hour with the new time-based separation in light winds! nats.aero/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/TBS_ReadMode.pdf

No worries mate, you still have the RAT. 😂

I was surprised to see the other inbound aircraft not diverted to a holding pattern. Surely once an emergency is declared, that plane has priority and the undivided attention of the controller?

@joshjones5172

2 жыл бұрын

There are 4 parallel runways eastbound and this pilot chose 6R, so the other traffic were kept on the other runways.

So, all 767 don't have the hydraulically driven generator?

isn't this Air Transport International (ATI)? or are they flying for Amazon

@AirTrafficVisualised

2 жыл бұрын

This aircraft is operated by Air Transport International on behalf of Amazon Prime Air.

Indication of possible fire… get down

There are 3 power sources, apu in rear, generator on each engine. Two of those failed in the flight. (apu likely before flight) Being down to one power source is not ideal.

I cringe every time I hear an aircraft declare an emergency, and the tower forgets to ask: souls on board and fuel. Kudos to the pilot.

Would a pan pan not have been more appropriate?