Wave Particle Duality - Basic Introduction

This chemistry video provides a basic introduction into the concept of wave-particle duality. This includes the idea that photons and electrons can act as waves and particles.

Пікірлер: 51

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor6 ай бұрын

    Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/ Full-Length Math & Science Videos: www.patreon.com/mathsciencetutor/collections

  • @sandismike3822
    @sandismike3822 Жыл бұрын

    most outstanding tutor I've ever come across.....I came to know about your video tutorials since high school....now I'm second year in university. I've tried all my best to find your personal information and your educational backgrounds but to no avail. Anyway, I feel that I've stolen all your knowledge without acknowledging you so I just want to say a MEGA THANK YOU. As a Christian, I would like to pray that may my Almighty God continue to bless you with great knowledge and wisdom in your career, your family and your life.

  • @ordinarykiwi8553
    @ordinarykiwi8553 Жыл бұрын

    you managed to explain what my class tried to explain in 12 pages consisting of over several pages and dozens of paragraphs of nonsense in 6 minuets. thank you. Thank you so much.

  • @v_munu
    @v_munu Жыл бұрын

    Oh boy, are you starting to delve into topics of Quantum Mechanics? Im going into a QM course this semester and I believe refreshers of the maths behind it all will be absolutely invaluable.

  • @olukojuhenry7069
    @olukojuhenry7069 Жыл бұрын

    This is super.. topic i found difficult got simplified just in 6 minutes.. kudos ogc

  • @ratnakhadka8938
    @ratnakhadka8938 Жыл бұрын

    Please make video more on qunatum mecanics

  • @AkashYadav-jw8sh

    @AkashYadav-jw8sh

    Жыл бұрын

    Make video on quantum mechanics

  • @Packrunner4

    @Packrunner4

    Жыл бұрын

    Why

  • @bluedonkey180

    @bluedonkey180

    Жыл бұрын

    @@AkashYadav-jw8sh too hard

  • @con_el_maestro3544

    @con_el_maestro3544

    Жыл бұрын

    @@bluedonkey180 you're a smart blue donkey

  • @ratnakhadka8938

    @ratnakhadka8938

    Жыл бұрын

    To learn

  • @jeremiahikie7859
    @jeremiahikie7859 Жыл бұрын

    Lovely 🌹🌹 video. This has made my morning again! God bless you Sir. How I wish I can see thorough explanation on LIMITS AND FUNCTIONS with L'HOSPITALS RULE

  • @surendersingal2192
    @surendersingal219210 ай бұрын

    Thank you sir, For explaining magic of duality n photonic impact.

  • @JONNYBONES01
    @JONNYBONES01 Жыл бұрын

    Fantastic video, thank you.

  • @circumcisedpikle63
    @circumcisedpikle63 Жыл бұрын

    Love the video, a concise, easy to understand video with just enough details and drawings to get an overall understanding of the concept. A cordial question from natural curiosity: How and where is this dual-nature applicable in daily life?

  • @KibyNykraft

    @KibyNykraft

    Жыл бұрын

    A clarification + a small ad for a destination of tourists to northern Alaska or to northern Scandinavia :) : At fairly short wavelengths, the photonic localities inhibits a stronger energy value. For example at a more intense transversity. In optical frequencies, something occurs called shotnoise; this appears in photographs being taken in a limited luminosity environment using short exposure time/smaller aperture. The picture will have less clarity from the shotnoise: the photonic energy arrives as physical, specific localities. If the units are too small like in some wave-physical contexts, the lightwave is just APPARENTLY continuous (lack of clear position of the locality). Those who use the expressions "more or less quantization" are not using the word quanta correctly. A quantum denotes the uncertainty of how you can measure something. This is due to your limits of observation or measurement only. Particles are never quanta in a literal meaning. They are always physical localities. Newtonian corpuscles. The presence of wave patterns are not the lack of physicality. The principle of all present localities of nature is very roughly the same: If you throw water through a coin slot at a classic vending machine instead of inserting the coin, the water will branch more out and look like a wider pattern on the back of the coinroom just behind the slot area. This tells us nothing about how much or little the water molecules are molecules or not. We know that water are molecules. A wave of water can only occur if you induce energy to water, to cause it to waveform itself given that the energy is applied in specific manners. Like in the case of storms. The winds flow along the water. The water as a conglomerate of molecules will start forming as a wave because the energy brought affects the molecules. Without matter you have no wave. A wave is always an aspect of how matter acts. It is not a property of space itself. Once or if there is a wave of any type called a wave by the form, at every level of size, we know that we have a motion of particles. The more the subatomic particles rotate around their own axis (spin dynamics and spin "stacks") ,the more they will move like a wave path(also individually). The Earth spins on its own axis. It also has a wobble. It has a stack of two spin qualities. If it moved like that alone in a space with no friends and unbound to an orbit around a star, it would move as a wavepath. The particle if/when moving as a wave, is orbiting an imaginery horizontal or linear centre through the wave of many particles. A DNA molecule is by being a double helix, an atomically complexified wave. It also holds huge amounts of data. If you see an object moving by yourself so fast that it looks like a strip or cloud to your eyes, does this mean that the object is itself a strip or a cloud? Well of course not. It is our eyes deceiving us. They can't keep up. The same is the problem of measuring subatomic particles because they are very small and move very fast. We have less reference points for a position. The Earth wobble is why we have midnight sun in the north of the arctic Circle in June and July, and in Antarctica south of the antarctic circle while it's dark time and winter in the far north. In the district of Finnmark of Norway the time without a visible sun is from cirka November 30th to January 20th. Depending on where you are exactly. In Tromsø town however the midnight sun time is in the town itself shorter as fairly tall mountains surround the town. If you want to see the sun 24 hours at June 23rd solstice celebration you must get up to a high altitude or go some distance away from the town.

  • @hendrixphiri5429
    @hendrixphiri542911 ай бұрын

    I have really understood thanks so much sir❤️. I am a huge fun 🤩 of you🤘👏👏

  • @TheZafootz
    @TheZafootz4 күн бұрын

    Light can behave like a wave or a particle or what makes more sense is that Light travels as a wave but all light comes from glowing particles. As far as the photoelectric effect goes, it is not light striking the metal plate that causes a discharge. Its the ions in the gas around the plate that can become charged from x ray light shinning through the gas and reflecting off the plate. The charged ions discharge the plate into the surrounding gas by the high frequency light charging up the gas and discharging the plate.

  • @yousuffarhatkhan6470
    @yousuffarhatkhan6470 Жыл бұрын

    Very informative

  • @sammin5764
    @sammin5764 Жыл бұрын

    The best

  • @anilwalawalkar9183
    @anilwalawalkar9183 Жыл бұрын

    Pls make video on linear algebra And vector space

  • @SackbotNinja03
    @SackbotNinja03 Жыл бұрын

    Can you do the dirac and schrödinger equations

  • @johnm.v709
    @johnm.v7093 ай бұрын

    Hope to load 4 foot model of the "Smallest Particle" on pedestal soon at public place. Everybody can examine how that's waving.

  • @sintayehubedaso1377
    @sintayehubedaso1377 Жыл бұрын

    What is wave JG?

  • @oscarabdullai6260
    @oscarabdullai6260 Жыл бұрын

    Please make a video on lanthanides and actinides 🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿

  • @mythic_snake
    @mythic_snake Жыл бұрын

    Let me preface this by saying that I got a D in high school physics (mostly because I just suck at memorization). Anyway, I never really understood the wave vs. particle question. Isn't a water wave both a wave (energy) and a bunch of particles (water molecules)? Aren't sound waves both a wave (energy) and a bunch of particles (air/water/etc) responding to that energy? Doesn't a wave need some form of transportation (matter) in order to perpetuate? Can you even have a wave without some sort of matter to "wave" in the first place? Does this come down to causality in some way... where the stimulus and the result are somehow intrinsically connected? Is light a type of energy (wave) that creates its own particle (photons)? Sorry if these are dumb questions.

  • @tigerman6661

    @tigerman6661

    Жыл бұрын

    no

  • @Packrunner4
    @Packrunner4 Жыл бұрын

    Can u show us how to make methemfedamine

  • @madhavgirish3944
    @madhavgirish3944 Жыл бұрын

    W VIDEO

  • @DorjnamjimCSB-CSD
    @DorjnamjimCSB-CSD Жыл бұрын

    Pomodoro + Organic Chemistry = Knowledge ocean

  • @patcharaboonsomnuek4600
    @patcharaboonsomnuek460017 күн бұрын

    ...what is "wave"?...

  • @mearawoods1814
    @mearawoods1814 Жыл бұрын

    Quantum Physics

  • @sammin5764
    @sammin5764 Жыл бұрын

    🌟🌟🌷🌟🌟🌷🌟

  • @Doopidap
    @Doopidap3 ай бұрын

    Watch at 1.5 speed

  • @Jordan-River-Stone-Choirs.
    @Jordan-River-Stone-Choirs. Жыл бұрын

    You struggling for all students to know how to proceed in their education level.. Now, I need to help me. Show me how to know the nomenclature of classification of enzymes..

  • @luxurii7025
    @luxurii7025 Жыл бұрын

    woo

  • @user-pt3cs5xl5f
    @user-pt3cs5xl5f5 ай бұрын

    What happen to university professor

  • @SouthernHerdsman
    @SouthernHerdsman Жыл бұрын

    ether exists.

  • @pingpong3311
    @pingpong3311 Жыл бұрын

    Hello

  • @christianreyes3922
    @christianreyes3922 Жыл бұрын

    Im explained this before

  • @SpotterVideo
    @SpotterVideo11 ай бұрын

    String Theory was not a waste of time. Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: "A theory that you can't explain to a bartender is probably no damn good." Ernest Rutherford The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? -----------------------------------------------

  • @christianreyes3922
    @christianreyes3922 Жыл бұрын

    Told yall, im a mechanic.

  • @archer981225
    @archer981225 Жыл бұрын

    We live in matrix now 😂 credit to the guy Thomas young

  • @TTVCalmceeLow
    @TTVCalmceeLow Жыл бұрын

    First

  • @booguy2636

    @booguy2636

    Жыл бұрын

    Nobody cares

  • @juan3141

    @juan3141

    Жыл бұрын

    @@booguy2636 you cared enough to reply though

  • @booguy2636

    @booguy2636

    Жыл бұрын

    @@juan3141 replying doesn't mean I care that someone has a first comment. Get it together, bud.

  • @juan3141

    @juan3141

    Жыл бұрын

    @@booguy2636 you cared just enough to reply though

  • @booguy2636

    @booguy2636

    Жыл бұрын

    @@juan3141 negative

  • @schmetterling4477
    @schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын

    There is no such thing as wave-particle duality and one should not teach this outdated concept any longer. Dirac expressed very clearly in the 1930s that quanta are a completely new kind of phenomenon that is neither particles nor waves. Particle like behavior of quantum systems is caused by weak measurements (Mott 1929) and wave like behavior is a classical ensemble average of single-quantum systems without energy gap. Beyond that quanta produce absolutely everything we can see around ourselves as emergent effects. Cream cheese is a quantum effect. So are cubes of tungsten and neutron stars and lederhosen. To pretend that it's either particles or waves is a simple false dichotomy fallacy that oversimplifies physics in the extreme.

  • @lepidoptera9337
    @lepidoptera9337Ай бұрын

    Chemists should leave physics to physicists. We are, after all, also not trying to explain Lewis acids and bases to you guys. This video is just a bunch of horrendous nonsense. :-)