You don't need to compare the length of the campaign. If you played Call of Duty 2 2005, you realized the single mission of that game has more energy and excitement than mwiii. The campaign mission structure was unfinished version of far cry.

@MMR650

7 күн бұрын

Mw3 2005 was the best one even tho it was short I felt like I was actually in the game

"The thing your gf complains about the most. The Length."

@Haloboss9572

10 күн бұрын

😂😂😂

@frostburn3736

10 күн бұрын

@@Haloboss9572 🎞🎞🎞

@slidersides

10 күн бұрын

That’s the point we want 7 inches not 3!

@mohamedjalwaan9236

10 күн бұрын

​@@slidersides you get 5 take it or leave it

@curlystoogemire

10 күн бұрын

Bold of him assume that we have girlfriends

Mate, there isn’t a single redeeming factor about it. It’s a disgrace and doesn’t deserve to even be reconsidered

It’s disappointing because if it wasn’t for the production hell it went through by being rushed and released within just 1 year after its predecessor with only several months to work on it, then maybe MWIII could’ve had something going for it

@allencallisjr4876

10 күн бұрын

Kinda the same for CoD Ghosts. The campaign didn’t get many bad reviews, but it was however the multiplayer version of the game that caught the most bad reviews.

@reygamerz8041

10 күн бұрын

@@allencallisjr4876agreed the story was alr but I want a sequel to it but the mp stop that from getting a sequel

@Deathmare235

10 күн бұрын

It definitely could’ve been better but how do you f up a story like that

@zzmr_stretchzz8772

10 күн бұрын

nah not even mw2 wasnt even close to good in story aswell that at the time was the worst but mw3 dropped an even worse story this entire reboot is horrible and makes the greatest cod trilogy not cannon

@zzmr_stretchzz8772

10 күн бұрын

@@reygamerz8041 people want a ghosts 2 they could totally do that but tbh id rather them wait till the games are no longer on a 1 year cycle

The MW3 campaign left alot to be desired, and Price killing Shephard in a cutscene as opposed to us the players getting to kill him was the crappy cherry on top. I dont understand why alot of games these days would rather make cutscenes where major villains are killed rather than us getting to kill him.

Yes, it was awful.

@jroo288

10 күн бұрын

It was not as awful as bo1’s campaign

@JackRF_

10 күн бұрын

@@jroo288Bo1 has one of the best cod campaigns in my opinion.

@blurfrosty8139

10 күн бұрын

@@jroo288are u braindead?

@reptilizer6116

10 күн бұрын

Real

@HoopyCoows

10 күн бұрын

@@jroo288least obvious bait

should've just remastered OG MW3

@huntersangster

10 күн бұрын

It’s going to happen soon. I still don’t trust Microsoft and Activision because why were they not just make? Remake game like bo1 bo2 WAW and mw trilogy remake it’s something I was hype for this

@engagingweirdo

10 күн бұрын

Well even if they did then people would play that than probably vanguard or mw2. Same thing happened with cod 4 remastered. I don’t think we’re gonna see anymore remasters after bo2 next year

@LostStories47

10 күн бұрын

It has been reported that the original modern warfare 3 is already remastered since 2020. But they cannot release it because of legal matters between Activision and Microsoft.

@huntersangster

9 күн бұрын

If these legal issues doesn’t stop, why not shut down Activision fire ceo or FIRE Phil Spencer

@rockmycd1319

5 күн бұрын

@@LostStories47It doesn’t exist.

Tbh I don't think it's that bad, the story is ok but the Open Combat missions mad the story telling boring tbh.

@kampeona2654

10 күн бұрын

It was bad, they integrated warzone into singleplayer, bad decisions like keeping Alex and Graves alive, soap conclusion etc was a huge letdown to overall stuff

@killershue

10 күн бұрын

The alex and graves not being dead things are stupid. But I can get behind soap dying. Homie died in the og mw3 as well. It's a Canon event that leads to the death of makarov in both timelines.

@boredflandre8234

10 күн бұрын

It’s very bad because of laziness, terrible plot, and bastardizing beloved characters imo.

@Juicy_wiwi

10 күн бұрын

“The story is ok” the story had the most plot holes I’ve ever seen in a game. Makarovs motive was stupid the OCMs were terrible and the characters sucked

@Deathmare235

10 күн бұрын

⁠@@killershueso what if he died in mw3 it’s a completely different universe also he died as a hero and they actually cared for him, the way he died was so different that it’s not even a canon event

I dont have to watch this to say, yes, it was easily that bad and probably worse than that.

@greatestfactvideos

3 күн бұрын

Blame infinity ward, everything had to go through them and really limited what sledgehammer really wanted to do with the story. I fell if infinity ward didn't have so much power over it, it could have been soo much better.

You’re looking at the length of each campaign without dying, achievement hunting or looking for collectibles; just a clean beginning-to-end playthrough without restarting at checkpoints.

@wi5i413

9 күн бұрын

For the purpose of this video i think thats okay

Yes, it's the "The Rise of Skywalker" of the reboot trilogy.

@Supersonicspyro

5 күн бұрын

So it's not good but it's still better than the previous lol

When Vanguard dropped everybody discovered Infinite warfare was actually pretty good. When MWIII dropped people went back to praise Ghosts. MOTHEREFFFING GHOSTS!!!! FOR GOD'S SAKE!

@FernandoMartinez-vy7we

10 күн бұрын

That's the COD community to you lol, if that's not hypocrisy, i don't know what it is

@ethanhunt6749

10 күн бұрын

If bo 6 fails ppl will praise mw 3 lmao😂

@kyflysupreme7727

10 күн бұрын

I knew I wasn't the only one😅

@lostgameseries

10 күн бұрын

Eh typical cod day for the community

@_Tacos_Al_Pastor_

10 күн бұрын

Facts and now that BO6 is releasing, everyone comes out and says Cold War was actually goated

BO6 campaign: 10-15 hours 🗿

@ThePovarPower

10 күн бұрын

Did Treyarch confirm it's length?

@saiyan_john

10 күн бұрын

@@ThePovarPowerSource: trust me bro💀 But honestly, it would be cool if it’s that long but average campaign time is about 4-6 hours long (depending on the game and how you play it)

@F1RST_BLUD1

10 күн бұрын

4 years= more time

@joeychristensen9399

10 күн бұрын

thats the dream (if it actually has a good story)

@rebekk8

10 күн бұрын

I don't mind it being short,as long as it's good.

Short answer: Yes it was. Should’ve just been deleted

@slidersides

10 күн бұрын

They should’ve got a better story righter

@piotrmontgomerytv7786

10 күн бұрын

I agree he supports scam here. Like come on actor who played Kratos comes in our defence that we deserve a meaningful campaign and he just says "3 hours is OK" like come on we deserve a worthy content, not just a drip. I unsubscribed from him now. I feel truly outraged. Then OK waste your money, I spend my on content. Also how much is cod 4? Got it for 4 bucks, and how much is MWIII? 70 BUCKS!!!

@allencallisjr4876

10 күн бұрын

I wasted my 70 bucks

@channel45853

10 күн бұрын

And have another Black Ops 4 situation?

@wickdaline8668

10 күн бұрын

Short answer, the game was rushed and the campaign was cut in half.

I feel like all the main characters were just thrown in there with little character development. And Soap dying was completely unjustified.

MW3 is so bad that Activision’s best course of action is not to have infinity ward make MW4 but to go back and redo MW3 and tell the fans that what we got is not cannon.

the campaign was so empty that in order to give a little bit of weight they used shock value by killing two characters in the main story. first the killed soap in the most shocking way, second the killed general shepherd in the most anti-climactic way. but in the original modern warfare trilogy general shepherd death had meaning, you literally fought a private military in order to just to get to him, it was a memorable mission. in MW3 soap died in a very heroic way and i believe these two factors are absent in MWIII's campaign. the reason why MWIII's campaign is flat and empty is because they want keep the good and memorable parts of story for another modern warfare title which is coming in 2026.

A comment on another video said “The only bad thing about a short campaign is a badly written one”

Soap’s death was so pointless and random. I’m PERFECTLY fine with character deaths and shocking character deaths (like bo2) however, this one fell extremely flat and almost forced. It was like “having soap die just to have a character death,” and it wasn’t earned at all.

@jaynickfonxey

10 күн бұрын

I mean all deaths are random.

@DylanoRevs

10 күн бұрын

Like what Bricky said in his MW3 campaign review. Soap's death was shocking and realistic, but it wasn't *Narratively satisfying*

@CoolManCoolMan123

9 күн бұрын

​@@DylanoRevsif they wanted that setting which could've worked very well for the MW reboot series, then they shouldn't have brought back Graves and Alex. They should've stayed dead and should've deserved worse, less satisfying death and more of a cog getting replaced.

@willhornsby206

2 күн бұрын

it doesnt help there were like 5 fake out deaths and practically everyone who died showed up alive after a few seasons

@DylanoRevs

2 күн бұрын

@@CoolManCoolMan123 Graves made some sense on returning since we didn't see his body. With tech today, it's plausible that he would put a radio in that tank (which can also be remote controlled). What i didn't like how they revealed it in a warzone cutscene. Imo, Graves revealed to be alive should've happened at the Mw3 campaign and in the "Wrong again, boys." scene.

Give us 8-10 hour campaign's

@mikeyhedgefox2817

10 күн бұрын

No

@KristijanRisteski-zp7bx

10 күн бұрын

@@mikeyhedgefox2817 off with you

@rebekk8

10 күн бұрын

Quantity≠quality Not a short af campaign but just a good one

@thegarfieldtavius

7 күн бұрын

@@rebekk8 I agree with that but there is no reason why the can give us a good 8-10 hours campaign. Most story games are of that size

Comparing MW3 2023 to cold war and BO2 playtime wise is insane, especially when both have replayability value (mostly BO2 and a little bit in cold war) none of the new MW games I have went back to replay the campaign, when I have went back and played both BO2 AND CW

@rebekk8

10 күн бұрын

Yeah,CW campaign was interesting to say at least

@CoolManCoolMan123

9 күн бұрын

​@@rebekk8it was one of the best campaigns ever. Every new addition was great, Adler became a really memorable character, the safehouse was pretty fun and added replay value, we can interact with great characters, The new characters weren't going off of their older versions, they were totally new guys and the mission Desparate Measures is genuinely of the best missions in FPS games as someone who religiously plays the new Doom games and their indie counterparts. The only complain I have is because of the set pieces breaking the immersion like RC XD faster than a f ing plane.

The open combat is annoying non open combat felt like call of duty campaign

@CoolManCoolMan123

9 күн бұрын

Yeah, true. We can finally push Makarov slowly through the tunnel without any destruction or a set piece going off. Very COD like.

I will stand by a more interesting thing would be for Price and Shepherd to have died as they're the rocks on which most characters rely and for Laswell to be MIA. We've done the "Protégé of Captain who might as well have been the son he never had dies," plot. Ghost, Gaz, and Soap alone with no rock and no Laswell to be their omniscient woman in the chair is a wild concept.

Tbh it wasn’t as bad as vanguard so there, but I wanted better open world missions where you can do different things rather than find different guns. (Edit/continuation sorry I’m at work) and I’d have preferred more linear missions like we’re used to, we have 2 walking sims too.

Yes. Campaign story felt rushed, Soap's death was cheap, there's Warzone crap in the Campaign, etc.

The thing about the modern warfare 3 length is that even though the average is around 4 hours newer campaigns are way easier so the older ones like cod 4 feel much longer because of how much you die and how difficult it is

It better be because I never played it because of the backlash it had

While everything you said is 100% true, the way soap died was stupid. When he died in the original there was emotion, in this one he died and it was like ...... oh well ........

The new No Russian By itself was one of the worst missions in CoD history, This campaign was worse than Vanguard

@charlesa6142

10 күн бұрын

I think Vanguard’s campaign was worse. By the end of it, I could not wait for it to be over. MW3’s campaign sucked though. The writing, and open combat missions were terrible. Plus, most missions were boring as hell

@Tipsy.42

10 күн бұрын

Hard disagree. MW3s campaign may be short, but it at least has characters I like with a somewhat intriguing story. I can't say the same for Vanguard however. Black Ops 3 and Vanguard are tied for my least favorite Cod campaigns.

@charlesa6142

10 күн бұрын

@@Tipsy.42 I agree with you. BO3 campaign I can’t say anything about that, as I never actually finished it. I quit like 3 missions in

@imanidiot1725

10 күн бұрын

Vanguard is atleast slightly better, atleast it has a story trying to tell, it had structure and why they were doing it MWIII on the other hand, 90% is pure filler and 10% actually progressing the story

@jaio3697

9 күн бұрын

Silence, vanguard fan.

every body says mw3's campaign is only about missiles when really if you take a deep dive into it you realize it is really about finding Makarov only the first few missions are about missiles

Every other campaign: 3-4 hours long Bo3: 9 hours long

It was clear that it had been rushed.

The problem with the length is how often you find yourself putting down the controller instead of being immersed in gameplay, it probably is around the same total length but the time youre actually playing is much shorter

Yes, yes it was.

The legnth isnt the issue, the story is literally horrible. The gameplay was just a warzone loop. Nothing was engaging. If people want it to be grounded, why didnt it play like MW2019 campaign. Looks like they are becoming soft and just focusing on the multiplayer portion of their game. Campaign to them is just meh, lets put a story that makes warzone story make a little more sense. We started to see this with MW2 reboot.

How tf is Makarov attacking Verdansk important, the only important thing was him being captured with the terrorist attacks never being talked about

@arwenosman

10 күн бұрын

They just had to mention Verdansk that’s why lmao

@agentlinrov1474

10 күн бұрын

It does explain why the airport was damaged back in 2019.

@Deathmare235

10 күн бұрын

@@agentlinrov1474 no it doesn’t hell it was a retcon, it was already explained that the airport was destroyed in the invasion

@Deathmare235

10 күн бұрын

@@arwenosman could’ve just stuck with the other missions like the prison, no need to add a flashback that retcons stuff

@agentlinrov1474

10 күн бұрын

@@Deathmare235 Intel from MW2019 seem to show the place like it occurred during Makarov's attack on the stadium. When Al-Qatala invaded Verdansk in 2019, the airport was already destroyed. Then again, the airport can be rebuilt before 2020 rolled around.

I really couldn't wait to play as a 55 year old CIA shrew

@AdrianHernandez-wb1ek

10 күн бұрын

We talkin bout Adler in bo6?

@KristijanRisteski-zp7bx

9 күн бұрын

@@AdrianHernandez-wb1ek The demigod gigachad that saved the western world through means others wouldn't even think of? The perfect halfbreed between Tom Berenger and Robert Redford? The guy that won over the entire fanbase within the first mission he was introduced in? NO. Kate Laswell, guy. The girlboss that i tolerated in MW2019 just because she took away screentime from Debra "Bulldog" Wilson. The MacGuffin that returned in MW2022 just to tick off a checkbox and lay on a VEEEERY obvious boat in the middle of the ocean doing FaaaaaK ALL. Only to then get kidnapped and get us into the Violence and Timing mission. The bag of loose skin and arthritic joints that can CLEARLY handle a male terrorist, yet not before we went a fifth around the globe and killed a 140 men saving her, because god forbid she turns into a "Damsel in Distress". And you wanna know the best of it all? I LOOOVE Rya Kihlstedt. I had a masssive crush on her as a kid and i've watched most of her movies. And even today she is an absolutely stunning and gorgeous woman. But IW has this thing where they touch up all the male actors (Barry Sloane doesn't have that low of a hairline) yet they uglify all the women: Farah's actress isn't really a rhinoceros either and Laswell looks 55 while Rya Kihlstedt looks mid 40s yet IS THE SAME AGE. They took a phenomenal actress that aged more than gracefully, aged her up not to be percieved as sexists, gave her HHHORIBLE writing and the only bit of character they gave her is has a wife. Now i LOOOVE girl on girl action as much as the next guy. But it's only there to round out the DEI checklist, not because it adds a damn thing to her character or the overall story, other than to prove Laswell is so bland and useless that only a woman would like her. So yeah, no, we're not talking about Russell Adler.

@KristijanRisteski-zp7bx

9 күн бұрын

@@AdrianHernandez-wb1ek no

I found it to be fun when playing on veteran and trying to go through the open combat missions silently trying to take everyone down

It’s awful worse than bad. It’s a disgrace. 💔

My problem isnt the length of the game, but how enjoyable it is. How replayable it is. It’s probably why we remember the older games more fondly, we loved the stories and elements of the campaign and played it over and over, giving a lot of us the conception that the games might have been longer. I think most people complaining about MWIII so much is more so the emptiness and laziness felt through the campaign and not really how long the game is. Not to take into account either some of the extra stuff within the older games with light exploration to find intel or just admiring the view of the games. MWIII didn’t tread any new grounds and instead played it as safe as a CoD could possibly play it. It’s disappointing in content, not length.

Horrible? No. Disappointing? *YES.* I still rather have missed a year so IW could cook and Sledgehammer could run WZ and DMZ support, maybe release the remade MW2 maps.

Imo, black ops 3 was the worst campaign ever created. I've played it through like 5 times (for various reasons), and i still dont even know the f*cking plot of that game. The only memorable thing for me is "train go boom"

@stormstrife6211

10 күн бұрын

THANK YOU i am playing that RIGHT NOW and I swear I am so mystified as to the plot?? Honestly I played Advanced Warfare right before this one (I'm new to all of these games and only play campaigns) and I swear Bl Ops 3 fits in with that one a lot more than Bl Ops. I swear I keep forgetting Hendricks isn't Gideon without an accent, lol.

@papasivir4241

9 күн бұрын

Yeah. If you know about the specific history vanguard was based on you might hate it a little bit more too but I feel like Black ops 3 and vanguard are tied for worst honestly.

@stormstrife6211

9 күн бұрын

​@@papasivir4241Yeah I've heard it was pretty bad, and after watching some videos about it, I can't really say I'm all that interested in trying it. That or IW but mostly because I'm bad enough at CoD that I don't need to add piloting a spaceship on top of it!! LOL

@CoolManCoolMan123

9 күн бұрын

​@@papasivir4241atleast BO3 had good gameplay.

@CoolManCoolMan123

9 күн бұрын

​@@papasivir4241atleast the gameplay was fun

What I liked about it is the fact that each member of TF141 has their own missions. I wish Ghost had more than one though. I mean would you rather play as Captain Price or some mute operator that never speaks and has no character development?

@Deathmare235

10 күн бұрын

That’s the only good part though having just a bunch of random missions is way worse than the a plot b plot

I completely agree that Gaz should've died. His character was somewhat like Soaps original character. Under Prices wing and learning everything that made Price so good. Gaz's arc was pretty much done, but Soap just started a great character arc with Ghost. If Gaz died, it would make Price much more passionate about killing Malarov the same way Soap originally died.

@alphalfamcquavious9825

10 күн бұрын

I was thinking the same thing

Bullshit. The original modern warfare two was less than three hours of a campaign. That shit took me like six hours to complete.

One thing I can commend IW for was that they had a good story for set for MWIII. I personally didn’t mind MWIIs story, while it wasn’t as good as MW 2019s story it still had a great characters and gameplay. MWIII as whole should’ve been what was intended a 30$ expansion to MWII to set up Makarov as a character and build up for a genuine MWIII or MWIIII.

@CoolManCoolMan123

9 күн бұрын

MWII was character focused story which was a good direction as they could solely focus on the villain and the set pieces instead of constantly focusing on character development.

Considering it still feels like an unfinished campaign and we’re most likely not going to get the finishing to it. Yeah, it’s a horrible game and a horrible campaign.

Ive read that according to the narrative director at Infinity Ward, there will be a Modern Warfare 4. We can only hope. I want to know how this story plays out.

It felt unpolished and rushed. But Price and the Team will be back. They won't do the same they did with Ghosts.. To paraphrase Capt. Price : "It wouldnt do them any good"

MWII was supposed to be a 2 year game but it sucked so much that Activision decided to make MWIII and they put together a rushed campaign

@Mobnetwork

10 күн бұрын

Nope, MWII was NEVER planned to be a 2 year cycle game. That was just a thing stated by multiple streamers who knew nothing.

@BossAydan

9 күн бұрын

Activision and IW bossed around Sledge and that's why instead of 3 years, we got 16 months of dev time.

@rockmycd1319

5 күн бұрын

@@MobnetworkSo you’re telling me MWIII was always supposed to be as it is? Lmao I highly doubt that

there's a reason why MWII had significantly more views than MWIII. MWII's campaign was amazing. great dialogue, great missions, tons of views. such a badass game.

The answer is simple: Yes.

i just replayed the og MW2 and some of COD4 remastered and a little MW3, how they made those games so much better than now when the tech is so much more advanced than it was over 10yrs ago. the missions aren''t overly long but they're a lot of fun, there's a good variation in environments, types of mission and some fun moments, the snowmobile being one of my favourites. even outside the campaign the spec opps is so much better, mw2 has like over 20 missions and they're all good fun and challenging, from what i've played of the mw2019 spec opps the backwards evolution of them is crazy. and it says a lot when they just remaster all the og mw2 multiplayer maps for mw3 instead of making new stuff

I think the length was only part of the reason the campaign felt so short. It didnt have a lot of value story-wise and when i reached the end i had this feeling of - "Is that it? Thats the end?" Which just made the whole thing feel unfinished and like it didnt accomplish what it should have

I will defend any campaign, but this one genuinely disappointed me and I will never defend it

The open combat missions absolutely sucked

cod campaigns are normally short 3-4 hours but have a lot of story told. mw3 had 3 hours. and half of that time is cutscenes where as im older cods you're still in control as the cutscene is going because you can look and move around

the original mw and mw2 have 3 - 3 and a half hours long campaigns, yet they are more memorable and liked because of the storytelling and mission, this game is 3 hours of boredom since 60% of the missions are open combat which is just warzone but in campaign. tbh idek what activison smoked and made them thinking that a game with less then a year of development time is such a good idea and increase in profit (sledgehammer games aren t the ones to be blamed for this horrible game since they had like 6 months to prepare this and launch it the same year)

Yes, it is that horrible. Especially, for a full price game.

The campaign ideas wasn’t bad just the execution was terrible

Modern Warfare 2019 campaign did really good, i always loved it Modern Warfare II campaign was pretty good in my opinion, not better than the previous one, but was really enjoyable Modern Warfare III campaign was like taking the story which infinity ward was cooking and throw it to the trash, the worst one or not, it is what it is

The problem with the open combat missions is that they can literally be speedrun in less time than the scripted missions in previous games. As a result, a single open combat mission feels shorter and has less story, making the overall narrative seem shorter. If we had traditional scripted missions instead of the open combat ones, which can be completed in about 5 minutes if you know what to do, the game's length and depth would be more satisfying. But the problem of the entire MW3 production is they were rushed to make it after Activision said there won't be a new cod in 2023. If they did this, and now we had black ops and after that MW3 it would decently be better than this pile of rushed junk we got.

Something I can say is that ink can really think for himself

I’ve always said this that the average campaign typically the first time you play it is 4-5 hours and yet I see tones saying the average is 6-8. I think the only reason MW3 seemed short was probably due to the fact that majority of the game was boring and had missions no one liked. all the OG’s on the other hand seem ridiculously long purely because it’s interesting.

Open Combat missions shouldn’t have been a thing. The story didn’t feel like 141 was really working as a team because of those missions. Price should’ve been the one to die instead of Soap. He was the only survivor in the original trilogy they should’ve done something new.

older campaigns didn’t have nearly as many cutscenes, and they definitely weren’t as cinematic i don’t think you can compare a game like MW07 to MW2023 because they force you to watch a tv show in between missions, and that’s like a third of the playtime

I actually didn't know that the other COD games were around the 3-4 hour mark. The original MW trilogy felt so long because of all the action packed into it. For MW3 rebooted, all of the missions felt too short, and I think that's what makes the length a problem. Even with the open combat missions, if you gun through them, you can complete them in as little as five minutes. Similarly with MW1 and 2 rebooted, those both felt long-ish, but some of the missions felt too short for me to get a whole lot of enjoyment out of them.

Are the streams for the campaigns in release order or chronological order?

Cod needs to go back on the story mode and not with an open world….

@jaio3697

9 күн бұрын

BO6:

I really hope bo6 is good, treyarch has never disappointed me, there games are all fantastic, while IW has consistently over the past 4-5 years disappointed a lot

For me the reason MW3 story is in the bottom of the list for good CoD story is that the threat wasn’t as big as it should have been. Yes Makarov is the threat but he wasn’t made into a big threat like in the older games. Soaps death was a small thing too. MW3(2011) at least gave me a reason to care about his death.

When we find out that homeboy wasn’t in that tank… super important.

Soap in mw4: ”-i wasnt in that game”

Obviously hindsight is 2020, and I didn’t play the MW3 campaign just saw playthrough of it. But I think a good way they could’ve added some depth and better storytelling to the MW3 campaign is this: The mission where Price inhales gas, he actually goes into a small coma/or is so severely affected by it that he has to stay in a hospital/out of the field for the rest of the campaign. He can be a voice on the radio and a mentor but isn’t actually out fighting. The team constantly visits with him in the hospital/back at base camp after each mission to discuss everything. The flashback mission to Verdansk stays. Then in the final mission, Soap dies and Makarov escapes. This makes Price feel guilty cus he wasn’t there to save Soap and didn’t let Soap kill Makarov when they first captures him. This sets up a revenge arc for Price in a theoretical MW4 where maybe he goes outside the rules of combat to accomplish his ultimate goal of killing Makarov. It’s kinda similar to OG MW3 but hey they reused a lot of plot lines already so who cares. Plus I feel like it gives at least SOME more emotion to the characters and motivation, also giving a realistic consequence of Price inhaling a “lethal” gas.

4:04 You know the thing is, whenever I want to hate on a cod campaign or say a bad thing about them, I say that every cod campaign is short, especially the new ones. The worst thing about every cod campaign and every cod story is the fact that they finish them when you are not ready. They don't have a story that slowly and surely makes you ready for the finish line. I remember that one of the complaints that I had with the mw19 campaign was the fact that it ended when I was not ready and it is the same for all the cod campaigns. I really want a longer campaign that continues the last campaign of that series (for example, I wanted mw2022 to continue the story of mw19, but they made another story with hassan zayani. Or even my biggest disappointment with mw2023 was the fact that we had lots of plot holes that we could continue but guesse what ? They didn't even mention them)

I think 6 - 8 hours is the average length of a Cod Campaign just because I like to take my time and have fun instead of rushing through it

@esamsenpaiak74ss

10 күн бұрын

Correct, people back in a day used to enjoy a mission multiple times, sometimes playing it longer, sometimes playing it fast, using different Guns, different gadgets, and multiple challenges liks in BO2 for example.

@W1ck3dR3al1ty

10 күн бұрын

@@esamsenpaiak74ss I gotta say that is true, BO2 is my favorite campaign 🤙

@esamsenpaiak74ss

10 күн бұрын

@@W1ck3dR3al1ty a Man of Culture I see.

@esamsenpaiak74ss

10 күн бұрын

@W1ck3dR3al1ty For real, WAW, BO1 and BO2 are best trilogy in the history of Call of Duty.

@arwenosman

10 күн бұрын

⁠@@esamsenpaiak74ssman BO2’s campaign was so damn cool, literally the only COD campaign to be replayable with the different endings.

In my opinion it's a YES, the game is unfinished, the attempt to create non-linear missions failed miserably, that "open world" imitation they tried to create doesn't work, the missions feel bland, they don't make impact. The new Makarov does not truly intimidate, he does not demonstrate the evil and malice that the original did, the expressions of the new Makarov seem little in line with the malevolent "intentions" he has

I also think that Modern Warfare 3 turned out to be bad was also because it lost its realism it had back in 2019. If you compare MW2019 and MW3 2023, in terms of story and atmosphere, you can kinda tell the major differences, as MW2019 felt more grounded in reality whilst MW3 moved as far from that same tone and atmosphere.

the MWIII campaign was them trying to implement a ghost recon type play style. the acting made the campaign tolerable. but the story was rushed and felt rushed, so many plot holes i saw that didn't tell me how we got here.

Biggest problem for me, was that I don’t feel their was a single memorable mission in the whole campaign

I think the campaign should be at least 10 hours

@CoolManCoolMan123

9 күн бұрын

I thought 6 was reasonable. 10 hours action packed campaign 💀

Honestly, this video shouldnt have been made. Activision didnt give it a second glance before shipping so neither should we. Now if the topic was "What we got wasnt that bad for the amount of time and resources sledgehammer was given" then it would be a different story

To me I still enjoy it. It wasn't that bad to me in my opinion

@Desmond45

10 күн бұрын

Compared to other call of duty campaigns, what do you rate MW3 2023 campaign?

@BloodBathhhh

10 күн бұрын

@@Desmond45 0/10 is my rating

@christiandavis8055

10 күн бұрын

@DonDada773 maybe 7/10 like said not the best but I had a good time

it felt rushed and unoriginal. The good COD campaigns felt like a blockbuster movie, this felt like a midseason finale of a netflix show. They shoehorned some locations into a campaign and then were like: "well, someone has to die". Not for story purposes but just to the drama baby. A typical "checklist campaign". We see what we see

Best advanced warfare campaign missions would be the press f to pay respect and the hover tank mission

Yes, it was a DLC. They didn’t program teammates in the weapons free missions, they didn’t bother to curate a soundtrack for the campaign, the plot is solely finding the missiles after that’s all we were doing in MW2, they brought back Graves despite being blown up and retconned it with “I wasn’t in that tank”, they teased No Russian and just didn’t do it, Makarov was horrific and also somehow cheated death with no explanation, there were so many pointless missions like the walking one with Laswell, and after all this contrived, boring, lazy bullshit, they have Soap dying like an idiot with Makarov just popping up around a corner and capping him in the head, that is then not reacted to by any of the characters and then they end it with a shitty limp funeral and then a post credit scene of Price killing Shepard when none of us cared anymore bc they completely shat on MW2019 and MW2022. It was an insult to cod campaigns, an insult to storytelling, by far the worst campaign in COD history. Thank fuck it wasn’t longer bc I probably would’ve shot myself before it ended. I really hope they don’t bring out another MW game bc the damage done by this campaign isn’t salvageable. It’s crazy how excited I was for the one after the previous two and they completely gave us the big “fuck you”

MW3 2023 had a lot of cutscene footage, which really padded out the campaign length. I don’t length is comparable to older cods. A LOT of EMPTY Calories

It would’ve been better if it were longer, didn’t add the little “open world” element, and didn’t kill off one of the literal most important characters in it. Makarov was cool, but he did nothing impactful, the “No Russian” mission was so lackluster, and the introduction of Yuri was silly as well

The problem is, people spent $80 just for the campaign alone Multiplayer is great, zombies is fine Camping is meh but it’s 1/3 of a game

I will say there were some memorable missions, the stadium shooting was memorable and so was No Russian. I just felt that the stakes were so low.

When promoting the campaign, the trailer really tricked us that Price was going to die, and the "hype" that there was going to be a No Russian moment ever since that MWII (2022) post credit scene. Open Combat Missions felt like a beta test. It needed more... something. Felt more like a collectathon with basic objectives. The only good mission from what I can remember is that one ice mission when you save Shepherd from Konni (hell I even liked when Shpherd talked to Farah like they were buddies buddies because of whole missile stuff). All action obviously, the only mission that felt it actually took my time to enjoy the campaign. No matter the outcome I was shocked how the game ended and to this day the ending needs a fat change, but an individual like myself can imagine that.

The campaign length isn't that much of an issue here. It's how we perceive it due to the lack of good memorable missions and moments. COD4, even though 3h long was full of good missions and moments. MWIII is just content, not art as the campaigns should be. Look at COD1 or COD2 or any other COD from the golden era.

Gameplay wise and story passing wise? Yes absolutely Overall story? Yes and no, they were willing to take steps and kill off characters but at the same time they didn't answer any major plot points in the reboot series and ruined some characters like Farah and Alex or the impact of missions like no Russian by letting Farah escape freely with absolutely no consequences

I'm sorry, but I'd agree to your whole point up until you've said that the guy should've died is Gaz, I know Soap is a fan favorite character, but Gaz's depiction in the reboot series is by far my favorite. I was actually hoping to see that Price being the one biting the dust.

yes

Ive decided to play through all of the COD campaigns on Veteran, playing COD4 made me realize that game's missions are basically all bangers. I dont think COD4 has a mission I didn't like, even with the fun and games from Veteran.

For me the worst part is how disjointed it felt. It fell into the Star Wars sequel trap, 2 of the games were written by IW but the other one was written by sledgehammer. (I really don’t think IW would have “killed” Soap off also has bad as this is, it’s still better than BO3s campaign.

Everything is 'bad' to people nowadays.. You want the campaign to be longer? Play it on the hardest difficulty.. I'm sure you won't finish it in 3 hours on your first playthrough

Maybe another factor that didn’t help was cutscenes at warzone. Warzone had their own stories and it could’ve been dlc or made into modern warfare 2 and modern warfare 2 & 3 could’ve been combined. (Even tho MW2 had a good campaign so I’ve heard)

I remember the first cod game I ever played. It was the og modern warfare 3. Personally I think that game is extremely underrated