voxelstudios -- Waste to Energy Plant in Mexico

Ғылым және технология

Waste to Energy Plant in Mexico City, the first in Latin America and one of the biggest in the world in its category.
Video presentation of the plant and description of the process to convert waste to energy.
Find out more about voxelstudios: www.voxelstudios.es

Пікірлер: 58

  • @tomkelly8827
    @tomkelly88274 жыл бұрын

    We need more of these in Canada too. Well done Mexico city, you are on the right track. If you want to get even more power out of the same amount of fuel, I hear combined cycle turbines are well worth the extra cost. A gas like propane is boiled at very low temperatures in the cooled flue gas after water has been boiled for the steam turbines. It is the same principal as a steam turbine just with a liquid that boils at a much lower temperature

  • @markbinnis6210
    @markbinnis62102 жыл бұрын

    This project was cancelled. Expensive. CDMX decided to focus on waste reduction instead.

  • @kamaruleffendi
    @kamaruleffendi5 жыл бұрын

    Very nice animation!

  • @vanlinhnguyen4758
    @vanlinhnguyen47585 жыл бұрын

    how to get this model , great animation video , waste to energy wil be change the work we live in future .

  • @gosula.amaralingeswararao8698
    @gosula.amaralingeswararao86982 жыл бұрын

    Good information sir

  • @user-de3ez9lf3e
    @user-de3ez9lf3eАй бұрын

    Excellent, Maybe you can use the RDF-5 to vanish the impact of circumstances

  • @Liberty_Freedom_Brotherhood
    @Liberty_Freedom_Brotherhood11 ай бұрын

    Has this been built yet?

  • @-magedarqoub4390
    @-magedarqoub4390 Жыл бұрын

    Please can you tell me the cost of this project

  • @yancyfaye
    @yancyfaye Жыл бұрын

    Hi! can we use this video for educational purposes?? thank you.

  • @joshuawilson7201
    @joshuawilson72013 жыл бұрын

    Who's doing the construction?

  • @danietkissenle
    @danietkissenle2 жыл бұрын

    Just so yalls know riverside CA had a plant like this 30 years ago, but our lovely unions and epa decided to get it shut down because they weren't making any money from it. It was a closed efficient plant that provided cheap clean power and politics and unions got it shutdown

  • @Determinedfollower

    @Determinedfollower

    Жыл бұрын

    Dang. I hate when stuff like that happens.

  • @WJCTechyman

    @WJCTechyman

    9 ай бұрын

    No, it wasn't the EPA or Unions, most likely the penny pinching of expensive executives and investors since everything is a commodity in the US due to deregulation and the unregulated free-market capitalism that you probably know (little about) and love. Also, that penny pinching would keep the emissions fairly high because that adds an extra expense to the whole process.

  • @hendratakhansem
    @hendratakhansem Жыл бұрын

    I will be the first to bring change in Indonesia

  • @dianalorena9477
    @dianalorena94775 жыл бұрын

    Un gran proyecto! Una pena que quieran frenarlo solo con argumentos políticos...

  • @heiwarish4330

    @heiwarish4330

    3 жыл бұрын

    entonces este proyecto no esta e proceso ya?

  • @universal8228
    @universal82284 жыл бұрын

    wow... WTE power plant of Mexico generating 965,000MW per hour

  • @pastorgoof

    @pastorgoof

    2 жыл бұрын

    I was just wondering how is that possible I don't think there a power plant in the world that can produce that much electricity and to add insult to injury he say it can power 120,000 home

  • @garthwhite7845

    @garthwhite7845

    11 ай бұрын

    Has to be 96.5 MW

  • @rockrock8182
    @rockrock81822 жыл бұрын

    This is Singapore

  • @thegamechanger7157
    @thegamechanger71572 жыл бұрын

    You could do it Yeah we do this on people comport but we need to change people and materials It takes time What can do

  • @isurumadhusankka1389
    @isurumadhusankka1389 Жыл бұрын

    Anybody here operates reciprocating grate waste incinerator? I need to know in depth details. Please help

  • @santiagohenao3030
    @santiagohenao30306 жыл бұрын

    ¿Está planta no genera ningún tipo de contaminación al aire o al agua? ¿Esto es energía limpia o se produce alguna mínima cantidad de desechos?

  • @mauriciomontiel1493

    @mauriciomontiel1493

    6 жыл бұрын

    Santiago Henao puedo decirte, que nosotros trabajamos en conjunto de otras plantas "COVANTA" ese su nombre de las otras plantas, es la manera mas facil de deshacerse de la basura, y la que menos deteriora el medio ambiente, produciendo electricidad, y convirtiendo los residuos hasta un 90% menos que el de un vertedero....si hace esto la ciudad es un gran beneficio, en estados unidos, almenos cada estado cuenta con 3 plantas, en cada estado, en elgunos hasta 8 plantas como el caso de florida, Massachusetts, maine entre otros estados....pero algo si es seguro, obtendremos beneficios de esta planta de energia.

  • @juanmanuelzunigapelaez6615

    @juanmanuelzunigapelaez6615

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@mauriciomontiel1493 cuentan con experiencias exitosas en latinoamérica waste to energy en ciudades donde no hay separación en la fuente?.

  • @ek9772
    @ek97725 жыл бұрын

    How are you treating the dioxins, heavy metals, and waste water coming out of this facility? How do you prevent these contaminants from reaching subterranean aquifers or spreading through the air?

  • @StanleySweet14

    @StanleySweet14

    5 жыл бұрын

    Over 800 degrees c is enough to eliminate most dioxins during the combustion process.

  • @Emperor9992001

    @Emperor9992001

    5 жыл бұрын

    Not only are dioxins broken by such gasification but almost all toxic waste outside of radioactive waste can be broken down.

  • @williamrebune5588

    @williamrebune5588

    5 жыл бұрын

    Pasquale Gelardi Take it easy. We learn everyday

  • @mistermood4164

    @mistermood4164

    4 жыл бұрын

    there a filtration system in the loop to reduce emissions

  • @seneca983

    @seneca983

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Emperor9992001: Toxic waste that's a chemical element, like lead or mercury, cannot be broken down by heat and has to be filtered out somehow.

  • @CuthbertNibbles
    @CuthbertNibbles3 жыл бұрын

    I like the animation, but... 1:40 "965,000 MW per hour"

  • @ian74747

    @ian74747

    3 жыл бұрын

    Three Gorges Dam only produces 22,500 MW per hour.

  • @ericsperformanceparts1647

    @ericsperformanceparts1647

    3 жыл бұрын

    Probably meant to say 965 MW. 965 TW seems like a lot, but they did not say how big this plant was...

  • @rsinclair689

    @rsinclair689

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yeah that number is a little suspect.

  • @julianpuzzo6559
    @julianpuzzo65593 жыл бұрын

    Dioxinas para todos...

  • @scottcharney1091
    @scottcharney1091 Жыл бұрын

    He said "fluid discharge."

  • @jeraldsantosmunoz6273
    @jeraldsantosmunoz62732 жыл бұрын

    Is it clean? Just like nuclear powerplants?

  • @WJCTechyman

    @WJCTechyman

    9 ай бұрын

    Nowhere near. One of the beneficial byproducts of the Bruce Nuclear Power Plant in Ontario, Canada is it is a world supplier of medical and scientific isotopes. It is also the "flex fuel" equivalent to auto engines. It can take a variety of fission materials that conventional American plants can't.

  • @MrY4li
    @MrY4li3 жыл бұрын

    Did he really say 965,000 MW ?

  • @Diseaseisreversible

    @Diseaseisreversible

    3 жыл бұрын

    No 1.21 gigawatts

  • @instakillgaming
    @instakillgaming3 жыл бұрын

    it's steam? wouldn't it be smoke

  • @WJCTechyman

    @WJCTechyman

    9 ай бұрын

    Through the combustion of garbage, that hot gas (with the soot that is smoke) passes through a boiler to take water and make it into steam for the turbine. This technology has been used for over 200 years to varying degrees. It first started in Britain for pumping water, then made it into vehicles like trains and then into ships as well as power plants for factories. Along the way, the technology has been improved but mainly used these days for generating electric power and some niche applications with hobbyists.

  • @yuv8482
    @yuv84823 жыл бұрын

    How much does it cost to build ?

  • @Tacoman1967

    @Tacoman1967

    2 жыл бұрын

    We can't afford to not build it.

  • @Utkarshgg

    @Utkarshgg

    Жыл бұрын

    By textbook, it should cost 650-1000 dollars per tonne of waste

  • @sadiazia4103
    @sadiazia41036 жыл бұрын

    Cost of the project

  • @raymondalpha5880

    @raymondalpha5880

    5 жыл бұрын

    good question

  • @Napoleon_Blownapart

    @Napoleon_Blownapart

    3 жыл бұрын

    Too much for you

  • @Utkarshgg

    @Utkarshgg

    Жыл бұрын

    650-1000 $ per tonne of Municipal solid waste

  • @wade5941
    @wade59412 жыл бұрын

    This makes so much sense. Kinda odd that the greens are not pushing this technology.

  • @WJCTechyman

    @WJCTechyman

    9 ай бұрын

    Probably because the facts outweighed the benefits. Like coal, combustion of garbage has some nasty by-products. That said, if there were regulations on what kind of garbage is permitted to be burned so separating that can be somewhat problematic.

Келесі