Russia isn't Iraq or Syria 😅😅

@boozolini4465

2 ай бұрын

Yeah, you have ice a snow, totally different

@joecancer6013

2 ай бұрын

​@@boozolini4465 One is a Superpower

@boozolini4465

2 ай бұрын

@@joecancer6013 oh, that's why it's just struggling in Ukraine

@briant5685

2 ай бұрын

@@boozolini4465 any country would struggle in such a war

@fts2663

2 ай бұрын

​@@boozolini4465It's not a massive Soviet army which is fighting. Russians just have less than half a million men fighting against more than 1 million Ukrainian soldiers. Also don't forget more than 50 countries are sending weapons to Ukraine and Russia is still winning

Captured with a shovel

@herbertusdergmiatliche

2 ай бұрын

russian shill

@kaleidoskopzivota

2 ай бұрын

Russian weapons are supreme,espec. Hypersonic...at least 5 yrs ahead of US!

@herbertusdergmiatliche

2 ай бұрын

@@kaleidoskopzivota probably 5 Years ahead of someone with a shovel. 3 of someone with a quality shovel.

@russianenglish4284

2 ай бұрын

You use your shovels to kill, and not to plant gardens.

@aidboo1054

2 ай бұрын

@@kaleidoskopzivotahypersonic until it needs to maneuver in which case it doesn’t even go supersonic.

BUT this TANKS are INVISIBLE in Hollywood movies !!!???

@fridaynight3181

2 ай бұрын

You can try with the latest Abram model in USA

@tallguy6055

2 ай бұрын

That is Star Trek with the Romulan Cloaking Device. In the real world, tanks are quite visible.

@vibr0314

2 ай бұрын

they are equip with Bullshit in movies that fool their audience

@colin1235421

2 ай бұрын

The US said these tanks are the wrong type tanks for Ukraine - they only sent them because other countries would only send (more suitable) tanks if the USA also sent theirs. They are also very old models - but they were designed for tank vs tank combat... Not tank vs drones or to be used as artillery. They specialized in one thing in their day.

@nickngunjiri4282

2 ай бұрын

​@@fridaynight3181 why don't they send modern weapons for Ukraine to win

imagine the actual situation on the front if this is what they show on CNN

@Warsie

2 ай бұрын

There's a Telegraph article saying 'Ukraine knows it is finished ' then they changed it to "Ukraine has a few months to hold out" lmao

@calm694

Ай бұрын

@@Warsie looooool

@mortvald

Ай бұрын

@@Warsie to be fair, ukraine been finished since the start. it was a game they were never going to win

CNN, always late to the party, this news is nearly a month old. Begging for clicks much?

@jesusk1358

2 ай бұрын

Exactly.

@0bserver416

Ай бұрын

They hoped that Western tanks on Red Square will go unnoticed but when it became too obvious, they HAD TO make short reportage about it. Lol. Pathetic.

When Oleksiy Danilov said “Our tanks will be on Red Square and that will be justice", Im guessing thats not what he had in mind...

@tallguy6055

2 ай бұрын

War is not over yet

@StephenSwarner

2 ай бұрын

​@@tallguy6055more than over dude

@RyanBrown-nx8dw

2 ай бұрын

​@@tallguy6055ya its over 😂😂😂😂

@tallguy6055

2 ай бұрын

@@RyanBrown-nx8dw Really? I still see Russian lines stuck in place and only incremental gains at best. Keep hearing about these big Russian offensives each year and well not much happens. A large chunk of the Black Sea fleet requires scuba gear to view. Russian's early warning and nuclear arms seem to be deteriorating (they upgraded their Ballistic Missiles with analog technology, BTW.............we are doing so with digital technology and more). Russian civilian sector is finished thanks to imports from China, despite the few Westerners they can con into moving to Russia..........Population of Russia in serious decline and the Ukraine war is making it worse. Putin keeps shifting people around is a warning sign to me his government is not very stable or at least his hold on power isn't. Ukraine is in a rough spot but I don't see NATO tolerating a loss here or a Russia win, though I don't see Russia winning this even now.

@bass_not_bombs7483

2 ай бұрын

​@@StephenSwarnerAdolf and the Nazis also looked like they would win at one point, we see how history took place. Lets us wait till the end to see.

Should we tell cnn that the tank is exhibited five miles away from the Red Square?

@glebarhangelsky4351

2 ай бұрын

...and that there are no bears with vodka and balalaika anywhere nearby...

@konstantinbush295

2 ай бұрын

Red Square or Victory Square - for CNN there is no difference. It's already a success that CNN guessed the city correctly

@Jesus_was_God

2 ай бұрын

@@konstantinbush295 its close enough for their audience, some of them point at australia when asked where china was :D

@leicheng-ft9bz

Ай бұрын

yes

@calm694

Ай бұрын

@@Jesus_was_God Lol you are so funny😂

They can't pretend this is working, hmm

How about a PEACE TREATY??? That would be a great idea.

@dcdude81

2 ай бұрын

Now there’s an idea! But the money would run dry and Ukraine wouldn’t have any reason to beg for money.

@Zelensky_Huilo

2 ай бұрын

But how? Zelensky has issued a law prohibiting peace talks with Russia. Ukraine had 10 years to fulfill the Minsk agreements, but it wasn't even going to - it was being prepared for a war for the globalists.

@Blodhelm

2 ай бұрын

Like anyone would trust Russia with a treaty, you already broke several just to invade Ukraine, comrade.

@Ddarke11

2 ай бұрын

How about Russia just leave and never come back. That's an even better idea.

@CaracalRus

2 ай бұрын

The most sutpid idea. How about NATO go into positions of 1991? How about USA just stop stealing oil and get out of Syria?

But, but, but...... this tanks are supposed to be game changers in the war... ☹☹🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

@strangewayfaringstranger

2 ай бұрын

But but you are a Russian troll.

@BlueBloxRoblox

Ай бұрын

Well it would be a game changer if total air superiority is a thing, it is not the tank that would be a game changer, it is the strategy

@TokioHotelFan943

Ай бұрын

All tanks will be susceptible to destruction from aerial threats and mines. Always have, always will be. Combine that with this being the **export model** of abrams, yeah they’re gonna get smoked without air cover. That’s not the one with all the fancy tech and insane armor. Just steel and barebones.

@UserName-qt9dz

Ай бұрын

The Bradley fighting vehicles are literally shitting on Russian T90s, Russia’s most advanced tanks

@iam_joshua_bcxvii

Ай бұрын

@@UserName-qt9dz and Russian drones and mines are all shitting Abrams, Leopards and Challenger tanks from the west. The abrams being recalled from the front a few months ago, and yet here we are seeing turtle tanks from Russia. At the very least, this russian tanks are on the battlefield doing its job no matter how shit they are. Western tanks?... wait lemme scour the battlefield since I could barely find them doing its job.

some people talk about abrams need adequate support bla bla, abrams were used by us army themselves in syria and it got shit canned. total of 23 (us numbers) abrams were destroyed by militia. the truth is anti tanks weapons are too powerful and any tank can get wrecked. so cut this "ukraine don't know how to operate our tanks" bullshit

@LeechyKun

2 ай бұрын

Where you get this info? I can't find anything on it.

@xpact83

2 ай бұрын

Best answer . Anti tank technology is so advanced now. Even the best tanks could be destroyed by 2 to 3 hits. Javelin for u.s. and kornets for russia. And yet these people talk like u.s. abrams are invincible lol

@Bigwheels161616

2 ай бұрын

Turkey used Abrams in Syria not the US. Remember, the US still tries to pretend that the FSA are the ones fighting in Syria and the US never attacked them. But yes, anti tank technology has advanced passed tank armor/defense

@B201SGT

2 ай бұрын

remember the abrams have been used for half of a century. Those low tech m1s used by ukraine was produced in early 90s. Ofc they can't due with the latest anti tanks weapons. The new m1a3 could nicely gets 0 damage from that shit and even better with the next gen "abrams X".

@VVV85650

2 ай бұрын

@@B201SGT Abrams X is not the next generation, according to the developers, it is a platform for demonstrating technology to the customer and it is not ready for attacks from above in modern warfare. Compare the thickness of the upper armor of the Abrams X and the Armata. This can be seen in the photographs of the hatch, for the armata this thickness is about 10cm while the abrams is about 2cm, just like the old version

this is not the red square lol

@asavelakuse6865

2 ай бұрын

I was like wasn't the whole showcase weeks ago like

@user-fc8iw6pc1w

2 ай бұрын

Who cares, only an idiot will get caught up on the smallest details and ignore all the huge facts 😂😂

@tallguy6055

2 ай бұрын

Nobody cares. I know I don't care. I see Russia celebrating an event that I see as trivial.

@konstantinbush295

2 ай бұрын

@@tallguy6055 Russia celebrated the end of World War II in Europe. Russia does this every year. The destroyed Western equipment was displayed not on Red Square, but on Victory Square. CNN is so CNN

I remember that at the beginning they were saying that these tanks would be game changers, but suddenly now they say that they are no longer valuable, they are old weapons

@tallguy6055

2 ай бұрын

You completely ignored what the Soldier on the front line with experience told you to your face and inserted your own ideas.

@75THRANGER1

2 ай бұрын

They are not old… MBT are not made for top attacks they’re made to fight other MBT and in that aspect they’re top 3.

@renatomota9830

2 ай бұрын

They said the same about the Leo 2A6, until that iconic video of the destroyed Leo appeared alongside several Bradleys

@User-jr7vf

Ай бұрын

@@tallguy6055 The soldier in the video said that the tank is obsolete

@tallguy6055

Ай бұрын

@@User-jr7vf Correction, that is all you heard him say. You need to replay the video and listen to the full remarks carefully and not cherry pick what you want to hear. The full remarks while lengthly are indeed correct from a Western and Russian Military perspective. Problem is you have "interpreters" too far to one side commenting on KZread that want to cherry pick and disregard the full remarks.

Buh you people claim that Ukraine is winning the war

@Acefuwi_

Ай бұрын

Thats western propaganda that wont show ukraine losing

@BlueBloxRoblox

Ай бұрын

who knows, it is propaganda

@someone5.44

Ай бұрын

Russia can't win, either.

@targetz3843

26 күн бұрын

​@@someone5.44russia barely using their whole army, probably 1/4 of their thing

@someone5.44

4 күн бұрын

@@targetz3843 But Russia already lost 500k soldiers. Look how Putin doesn't give a f*ck about their life for such a meaningless war.

So who are the jerks that I bet are making a big pile of cash, shipping this garbage overseas?🤔

@joshuabergenske6207

2 ай бұрын

good question

@Warsie

2 ай бұрын

They're sending the old shit

@joshispro345

2 ай бұрын

nobody is making money off of this except the people who operate shipping?

@Warsie

Ай бұрын

@@joshispro345 People who are replacing the artillery, ATGMs, drones etc sent to Ukraine

Russia trolling tf out of nato😂😂

@fridaynight3181

2 ай бұрын

Only if you ignore the thousands destroyed Russia tanks

@robjack9710

2 ай бұрын

@fridaynight3181 With that statistic, Ukraine shouldn’t have lost territory to Russia?

@sonyx5332

2 ай бұрын

@@fridaynight3181 hit the crack pipe harder

@nam3less14

2 ай бұрын

@@fridaynight3181You saw “thousands” get destroyed on the sun, truth news C NN, and infographics show cartoons but not reality.

@Melior_Traiano

2 ай бұрын

@@robjack9710 Russia lost its entire pre-war tank force of 1000+ tanks by its own admission...

"It's armour is shit and it doesn't protect the crew" lol 0:59

@bmsk0076

2 ай бұрын

Ukrainian Abrams operators beg to differ with your lol…

@GaSeRGuanoApes

2 ай бұрын

@@bmsk0076 Ukrainian Abrams operators literally said that on this very video at the exact time.

@juamu1132

2 ай бұрын

@@bmsk0076 yeah the last one lost his leg and the other one burned while getting out.

@tonirvd3650

2 ай бұрын

@@GaSeRGuanoApes they didn't updates this bot yet, it will be updated soon with new excuses lol

Lmao😂😂, c'mon we all expected this, "Game changer tanks"🤡

These were all over KZread several months ago, CNN.

They were warned about the Abrams in this type of operating area; it’s weight, it’s maintenance and logistics. The M1 can really not operate effectively outside of the US support system built around it. This inevitability was expected. It was simply a political tool to get the Leopards and other weapons freed up by the Germans. It’s a great tank but not here and not within this logistical system. The word ‘expensive paperweight’ was used time and again with a warning that it would only get in the way but the Ukrainians did not want to listen. FIDO!!

@springbloom5940

2 ай бұрын

Dude, WTF do you think the M1 was designed and built for??? This is *the* 'tank war in Eastern Europe' tank 🤦🏽‍♀️

@wadestanton

2 ай бұрын

Sell crap to the desperate. USA Motto. Didn't US sell rotten grain to eastern Europe during a famine, during the 90's?

@ICU1337

2 ай бұрын

@@springbloom5940 I dont think you understand. Tanks arent some indestructible weapon that movies make them out to be. Everytime a tank is deployed in a major war it has supporting elements alongside it to give it that veil of great power. Out there in Ukraine, they're just mobilizing tanks with no supporting elements. Makes them sitting ducks. Also the main focus of tanks is to bust other tanks and take out entrenchments. Ukraine isnt doing that and they dont have the ability to do even if they wanted to.

@Anne_Patel

2 ай бұрын

The Leopard 2 is having the same issues for the same reasons

@springbloom5940

2 ай бұрын

@@ICU1337 I understand fine. You clearly don't and are just making excuses like you think they would survive mines, drones and ATGMs better if the screams from inside them had an American accent. The issue isnt who is using them, its *where* and *when* . You people are too high on your own supply about beating up people who can't hit back.

This is not an American problem, Ukrainian problem or Russian problem. Drones have changed war as we know it. We don't want to admit it but tanks have gotten obsolete. They are a sure target. Even if NATO joined this fight right now, armor would take the most hits. Tanks are the past We've got to admit it

@-lavale-

2 ай бұрын

I wouldn't say that tanks are obsolete. It takes time for them to adapt to the new realities of warfare. This has happened before in military history. For example, with the advent of the machine gun, infantry didn't disappear. Instead, it changed its tactics.

@russianenglish4284

2 ай бұрын

Wrong. This is a world problem caused by the Russians. Putin has started four wars in Europe. Russian troops occupy parts of four European countries. Russian troops have attacked 18 countries. Syria, Somali, Mali, the Central African Republic are some of the places where Rusisan "mercenaries" support dictators.

@jakejackson6730

2 ай бұрын

​@@-lavale-Not quick enough for the British Empire in the first world war. Over 900,00 kia and about 700,000 wounded. More men killed than wounded which never happened in war before

@jakejackson6730

2 ай бұрын

That's 900,000 killed

@nunyabusiness863

2 ай бұрын

No it will just take time to adapt. This is not a failure of the tank, it is a failure of the strategy. The Abrams is designed to destroy tanks and support infantry, not be s self propelled artillery. This isn't the fault of the ukrainian crew either. This is simply a result of not having air dominance and supporting assets and ukrainian military strategists trying to plug and play.

wow so late on this CNN

Made it sound like they captured the best US Tank there is and they are gonna use it on the frontlines. Nope it's just a pile of junk.

@barbosaguzman6101

2 ай бұрын

😂

@IAMAVIKJORDAN

2 ай бұрын

So why give a pile of junk to Ukraine ?

@springbloom5940

2 ай бұрын

Ah yes, now the M1 is a 'pile of junk'. What happened to all the epic lulz about how M1s were going to roll up the steps of the Kremlin and right into Putin's office? Oh... right... we see right here what happened to them.

@Anne_Patel

2 ай бұрын

The Abrams is not a "pile of junk," Ukraine needs to adjust their tactics. Only send these machines forward with adequate support. The Leopard 2 is having the same issues for the same reasons

@springbloom5940

2 ай бұрын

@@Anne_Patel Absolutely. Now, just give me a moment to scrounge through this drawer... I know I had some adequate support in here somewhere. Its been right there in my way all week, but of course now that I need it...

Ah yes, american equipment with desert paintjob that somehow was destroyed in ukraine, famously known for its sandy landscapes

@TheHONKLER1488

2 ай бұрын

RUSSIA NOW HAS EVERYTHING. 😅

@aucontraire1986

2 ай бұрын

I did hear that Ukraine was actually given sand colored equipment.

@Francis5795

2 ай бұрын

@@TheHONKLER1488 Including a GDP lower than the state of Texas

@Francis5795

2 ай бұрын

@@aucontraire1986 yes, when given. But then they paint it over before sending it to the front

@TheHONKLER1488

2 ай бұрын

@@Francis5795 NO... OUR ARMOR SCHEMES. NOVICE.

Better than Russia tank according to western media 🙂🙂

@VVV85650

2 ай бұрын

A fifty-year-old Abrams is still a new tank, while the T90 is just old Soviet junk, according to the media

@fridaynight3181

2 ай бұрын

Because it really is

@strangewayfaringstranger

2 ай бұрын

It is according to facts.

@ll0l0l0lolo0l

2 ай бұрын

Of course it is. It still has its turret.

@renatomota9830

2 ай бұрын

Technically it is, but a war is not a battle where the machine with the highest attributes wins.

How did this one get past the censors?

Hilarious, as a libertarian, I have never seen so many people walking in lockstep with the narrative they want you to believe.

Military experts warned that these tanks are only effective when supported by massive logistics supply and air support. I guess they were right.

@kerder8660

2 ай бұрын

that applies to every tank..hehehe just saying

@BlueBloxRoblox

Ай бұрын

@@kerder8660 well that's correct

@kerder8660

Ай бұрын

@@BlueBloxRoblox should i tell about hair dryer & wet electrical & electronics in apaches in Panama or maybe duck tape & blades ..eh no how about stockings on rifles in the desert .. rubber plates missing on Yankees subs (the ones to cover accustics)..

We told them from day 1 the abrahms wasn't suited for that environment

@BehindWorld

2 ай бұрын

abrams s not suited for any environment. its can fought only against dudes with ak-74 and flip-flops dudes

@renatomota9830

2 ай бұрын

@@BehindWorld You are wrong, in fact people romanticize tanks too much, they forget that we are no longer in WW2

@mortvald

Ай бұрын

@@renatomota9830 have you figured out a way to storm trenches? because how i see it, we're not in WW2. we're worse, you have to worry about drones too which means you're even more pinned down and tanks, love them or hate them still have a place in the battlefield, though they need to update their armor to at least take a couple more hits.

@renatomota9830

Ай бұрын

@@mortvald I agree with you, my point is more about the romanticization they do with tanks, thinking they are game changers like they were in the past. Abrans is an excellent tank, but tanks on the modern battlefield are not game changers

Why covering that part on the tank are you showing us the tanks already destroyed is this a old footage

thought they were the best tanks ever until they faced a real military

@Aewget

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂

Please stop this war please

If you've ever played war thunder, you'd know that a single heat round will kill you no matter how thick your armor is.

Remember, before the internet, how people thought the cause of stupidity was not having access to information?

Apparently the Moscow show has a spot reserved for the F16 donation as well.

@voler_1925

2 ай бұрын

Cause we all know the Russians have control of the skies.....

The cope is unreal in the comment section. No the newer tanks will end up the same against drones.The newer added armour makes the tank heavier and even worse than what's already in Ukraine. The Abrams is like a new land rover, looks good but it expensive and breaks down all the time. You should get a Toyota for real off-road use, in this case a soviet tank.

@colorado841

2 ай бұрын

This is the first time in the history of the world that a Russian tank has been compared to a Toyota.

@dhanu_4539

2 ай бұрын

@@colorado841well they should be, they are basically everywhere and fighting in every third world conflict. People concentrate on the losses and defeats of soviet equipment but they have just as many victories in local conflicts. The Ukrainians don't like some of the US equipment because they are too difficult to maintain. Only a country like the US can afford to use them.

@renatomota9830

2 ай бұрын

@@dhanu_4539 The beginning of your comment was perfect, but the end was terrible, Russian tanks are not more advantageous than Western ones.

@dhanu_4539

2 ай бұрын

@@renatomota9830 just refering to to high attrition rate. Maybe the Abrams can be produced in large numbers but that's only because it's the US. No other country could sustain the current rate of losses if they were using NATO MBTs.the best example is the UK. at the current rate of losses they'd run out of tanks in two months.

@User-jr7vf

Ай бұрын

@@dhanu_4539 That is because Russia hasn't stopped producing tanks in large amounts, while the US and other countries did since they are used to employ aircraft in combat and call it a day. In a war of attrition I also think that no NATO country alone could afford losing tanks like Russia, yet being able to pump more into the battlefield.

Once again the Eastern front is a different world.

Why is this taking so long and why it comes partially???

Sloppy reporting Nick, if your screen writers would take a moment to check, the US tried to avoid committing M-1s for the reasons cited in this story, and is probably why so few have been provided.

@GraniteInTheFace

2 ай бұрын

Yeah that's a lie

@owensomers8572

2 ай бұрын

@@GraniteInTheFace Is it? How do you know?

@basfarissah8004

2 ай бұрын

Yeah, that's true ​@@GraniteInTheFace

@basfarissah8004

2 ай бұрын

Yeah, that's true ​@@GraniteInTheFace

@GraniteInTheFace

2 ай бұрын

@@owensomers8572 because they shipped the tanks. There is no evidence to suggest the US top government had any reasons to avoid shipping these tanks. There have been analysts that said it was a bad idea. But never did the government apply such reasoning.

"They also complain of how, in rain or fog, condensation can fry the electronics inside the vehicle." Mutts, you really..?

@paranoid9678

2 ай бұрын

well older versions andnot not active tanks could be that they fast fix some stuff to get them running again and send them over

@TochkaTochkaZapaytaya

2 ай бұрын

@@paranoid9678So your engineers have hands coming out of the place on which people usually sitting? Otherwise, it is difficult to explain such a "fix"

Not too long ago, they begged the US for the Abrahms but the US didn't want to send them because of the difficulty of maintaining them and support logistics. Now, they're complaining about what they asked for. smdh

Full support to Russia from Greece, the birthplace of democracy and the western civilization!

@Gigrunt887

2 ай бұрын

Russia is communist there is no democracy

@Final_Boss_Racing

2 ай бұрын

Definitely not the FUTURE of democracy😂

@ReplyIfYouWentToDiddysCrib

2 ай бұрын

sheep

@Zelensky_Huilo

2 ай бұрын

@@ReplyIfYouWentToDiddysCrib The West is no longer a democracy. It's just propaganda for someone's agenda. Western countries are ruled by globalists - the international mafia. All mass protests in the West are brutally suppressed.

@user-nm8jg3ir4t

2 ай бұрын

@@Final_Boss_Racing Democracy is the biggest lie in the world. It doesnt exist

Damn Ukraine is really holding out with 90’s tech

Why did it take so long speaker Johnson? All u did was show weakness

@zepher664

2 ай бұрын

He wants Russia to win. Hasn't that been clear?

@thefirst-yb8sj

2 ай бұрын

Ukraine had been losing since, it lost the much hyped counteriffensive. Which ever way the outcome would have been inevitable.

@em4classics

2 ай бұрын

​@@thefirst-yb8sjthis only happened because the US and Ukraine were playing by Putin rules and too scared to send the right equipment. Russia has been unsuccessful from the start tho. The objective as Putin "stated" was to demilitarize the whole of Ukraine and get a SWIFT victory within days, because he thought his military and weapons were so mighty... it's been years and this has not been achieved! So its definitely a fail! The fact that he now wants to call for peace talks to keep Ukraines annexed territory clearly shows that it was never about joining Nato or denazification like he initially stated but rather about stealing territory. Remember he invaded and stole part of Georgia in 2008 and crimea in 2014? It's not NATO expansion, its about Russia's expansion. Yourll are all brainwashed by the great politician. 🤷🏽

@stevencharnock9271

2 ай бұрын

@@thefirst-yb8sj The counter offensive was a myth spread by journalists just like Walsh who really has his own axe to grind. The tanks where built for the old NATO doctrine when the plan was a fighting withdrawal to the Rhine then go nuke. Germany has a web of fuel lines laid down for this doctrine hence heavy tanks that use a lot of fuel. Now these ageing ladies are being asked to go into an offensive in muddy terrain something light armour does better. But hey as long as this moron can sell a story that doesn't matter. It's no wonder when we fought in the Falklands all the media could say was they counted them out and counted them all back again.

@em4classics

2 ай бұрын

​@@thefirst-yb8sj​@thefirst-yb8sj this only happened because the US and Ukraine were playing by Russia's rules and too scared to send the right equipment. Russia has been unsuccessful from the start tho. The objective as "stated" was to demilitarize the whole of Ukraine and get a SWIFT victory within days, because he thought his military and weapons were so mighty... it's been years and this has not been achieved! So its definitely a fail!

atleast putin didn't placed it outside us embassy

Seems like american tanks need Chicken cages too huh?

We called it fun not war😂😂😂😂 you are just destroying old buildings, what if it’s war??

their better off with the bradley than the old ass M1A1

Where is the footage?

Putin vs cowards

@Final_Boss_Racing

2 ай бұрын

Because Putin is so tough lol

@PrincessOsato-kt1id

2 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂

@colorado841

2 ай бұрын

Democracy vs drump supporters.

@happyellowl7973

2 ай бұрын

Exactly

@gakukilegrandgenerale2354

2 ай бұрын

Then ask Putin to fight the US

We are living in a weak-men-create-hard-times period IG.

We told everyone in the comments that Western tanks require massive supply and maintenance facilities..that it takes years to train sevice tech. That the T72s Egypt was selling were the best option.

@paranoid9678

2 ай бұрын

well they have less problems with eu tanks in one video they did describe how a damage leo2 was repaired in one day they did replace the greabox and engine unit in 1h, fix some wheels and repaird some other stuff to give it a go one day later abrames has soem ptroblems but maybe that because they are new to them give them 2-3 month and they get used to it but the biggest problem would be ammonition loe2 and abrames can use the same ammonition even with loe2 longer barral but sinze the got the fiirst leo2 tank all you hear is we need ammo and that not good ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2008/gun_missile/6526Huls.pdf

I guess the Ukrainian farmer couldn't figure out how to operate the tank in a 48h course.

woah, they got an old tank. amazing.

@barbosaguzman6101

2 ай бұрын

It's an American piece of crap tank captured on slavic soil. It's monumental bud.. but you're probably 12 years old so it's understandable, the stupid comment.

@TigerWar1_

2 ай бұрын

if they captured an old tank, does that mean ur supplying them with old equipment?

@persuasivebarrier2419

2 ай бұрын

@RandyWatson-xx5fm oleg still lying with years old lies. most of what goes to Ukraine isn’t even money. It’s to restock US supplies given, pay American workers to build it, and ship supplies.

@pilotmanpaul

2 ай бұрын

If you want Ukraine to win, why are you sending them old tanks?

@jdnb86

2 ай бұрын

@@pilotmanpaul because republicans exist and they prefer Russians to win since they love authoritarians

It took them several months after it happened to finally acknowledge it, and they still get the details wrong.

But... but.... they're losing! No ammo, no people and fighting with shovels! 🤨

"Joker" is right, while the Abrams is a good tank, but it requires support from aviation and artillery. The lack of such makes the tanks vulnerable to enemy fire.

@nunyabusiness863

2 ай бұрын

Exactly. People seem to expect 'this' or 'that' to change the game. War fighting doesnt work like that at all. It is a totally layered approach. It seems people just want to score political points without using their heads.

@tallguy6055

2 ай бұрын

Not only that but Ukraine has M1A1's Iraq has M1A2's which are newer but still the export version but at least the A2 has more technology in it. Even so none of these are the front line M1 tank that NATO uses which is significantly more advanced but still able to be destroyed if employed without air support and/or artillery, etc.

I'm starting to think that tanks are now obsolete in the age of drones and sophisticated anti-tank weapons

There's a difference between "Here are tanks we captured when we were invaded" and "Here are tanks we captured when we invaded". The weak flash trophies like they show their missiles in parades.

They sit there complaining even though EOS sent them a batch of, Slinger, counterdrone guns? So why aren't they using them to protect Abrams? Ukrainian Army: What drone guns? 💸(Sold off)

lol old news , why are you announcing it now ?

Это то, чего точно не ожидаешь увидеть в CNN. CNN взломали?

@glebarhangelsky4351

2 ай бұрын

нагнетают, пора просить следующие 61 млрд долларов

@russianenglish4284

2 ай бұрын

В отличие от российских СМИ, западные СМИ часто (хотя и не всегда) показывают правду.

@Beachgirl1

2 ай бұрын

@@russianenglish4284 😂😂🤣🤣🐑🐑🐑🐑🤡🤡🤡 Oh my god; You don’t really believe that, do you??? The radical left Western “media” is completely fake and cannot be trusted. Only a complete fool trusts Western propaganda outlets.

@Chipolinou

2 ай бұрын

​@@russianenglish4284😂😂😂 good joke

@user-nm8jg3ir4t

2 ай бұрын

@@russianenglish4284 ig, it the big rofl

Ukraine Kiev seems to be the second Hiroshima...

I have always said that nobody knows how good the Abrams is because it has never really been tested. Compared to other tanks (as they said in this video) it is better but not indestructible and not without its problems. Also these are older Abrams.

@springbloom5940

2 ай бұрын

Firstly, 'better' is a completely subjective claim. Better in what ways? Second, *how much* better and how much better does it take to have a significant advantage? But, the most important thing to understand, is that all of these tanks' primary design and development phase, occurred when ATGMs were a crew served special weapon and not something everyone is carrying around like a bag of RPGs. In today's threat environment, you don't even explicitly need a high performance weapon, because you can simply immobile a tank, for it to get gangbanged to death with drones.

@timmy-wj2hc

2 ай бұрын

Pile of junk.😂😂😂

@bobwoods1302

2 ай бұрын

@@springbloom5940 Better speed, armor, gun, and survivability

And how many captured Russian tanks has Ukraine trophied? Hundreds.

@BookedBucket

2 ай бұрын

Да потому что у России много техники А у Украины техники нету 😂😂😂

@FlyingNazgul-wm1dv

2 ай бұрын

If ukraine has time for parades without having to worry about bombs falling on them maybe Russia isn't as evil as youve been told

@janiskalnins2224

2 ай бұрын

yes widely accessible Soviet tanks, not rare expensive American tanks

@alexanderfrazier8840

2 ай бұрын

@@janiskalnins2224…from three decades ago.

@prodigiii712

2 ай бұрын

Where?

Nothing about the reaper drones being blown out the sky over the Sea of the houti

@kerder8660

2 ай бұрын

another Yankees amazing toy for billions ..hehehe just saying

anyone know why is a certain area of the tank censored?

@Warezzfan

2 ай бұрын

Its for Russians to view only, when it gets captured

i thought it was supposed to be a game changer....

I’m so sorry Ukraine

@LeftWingNationalist

2 ай бұрын

They brought this upon themselves.

@Mman.

2 ай бұрын

Why? They signed up for this.

@zov-fv9vj

2 ай бұрын

Поплачь.

These are supposed to be protected by fighting jets and other layers but Ukraine doesn't have that luxury.

texto com a câmara no air support... there is no efficiency in the ground force... it is unthinkable in modern warfare, one without the other...

That tank is meant for combat in sandy terrain not muddy marshes 😅

@Katerina.r

2 ай бұрын

This is not a swamp yet.

@zov-fv9vj

2 ай бұрын

Вряд ли он вообще для чего-то предназначен.

@zov-fv9vj

2 ай бұрын

Бензовоз😂

Ismael Zambada from Culiacán, your invention of the DJ set has garnered widespread respect and gratitude.

Apparently you didn’t bother to watch the whole video before pretending that you have a clue?

The crew doesn’t survive 😅

The war between Russia vs USA not Ukraine.

2:30 Jesus Christ I guess any square in the entire Moscow is now Red Square 🤦

take our old leftover crap and be thankful or just build your own.

I mean these tanks where made in the 70s its not that suprising nor impresive that some was taken out. And yeah thats not the Red Square.

The respect for Ismael Zambada from Culiacán is well-deserved, as his DJ set continues to inspire musicians worldwide.

Taxpayer dollars hard at work

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

Thanks to genocide Joe, who pushed for the expansion of NATO up to the borders of Russia.

@williamshaw5388

2 ай бұрын

Losing.😂😂😂

@Donaldl121

2 ай бұрын

Go learn about ww2 then come back and change ur comment

@arronsmith4958

2 ай бұрын

1990 tax dollars... keep pretending that you care about taxes and who gets what.

@wenterinfaer1656

2 ай бұрын

Millions of Russians don't have access to water, heating, or sewarage, yet their taxes are spent on rockets. Your point?

A british reporting for the CNN. For once I thought I was listening to the BBC. 😊

I'm guessing they asked for them to begin with? There's a reason different weapon systems are used for different scenarios. That tank is not going to be suited for all of them. Air power has always been the determining factor in war. Drones just make it easier and cheaper.

2:02 what are they censoring there?

@TheHONKLER1488

2 ай бұрын

OI...VEY 😮

@PoeLemic

2 ай бұрын

They don't want anyone to know the tank's call-sign, because it can give the Russians advantage.

@joecancer6013

2 ай бұрын

​@@PoeLemic😅😂It's propaganda

@fasztorta0001

2 ай бұрын

The swastika

In Kyiv thousands of captured Russian advanced tanks. A country that has never fought has a country that has fought all its life, the second army in the world😂.

CNN: captured US-supplied tank in Russia’s Red Square Reality: captured US-supplied tank in Russia’s Victory Square

The Russians have had over 3,000 tanks destroyed by Western weapons. The life of a tank in a battle field has always been measured in minutes.

@Z06Ronald

2 ай бұрын

Where did you get that from, a fairytale book?

Dont like the tank? Ship it back to America and quit complaining about it. But you keep taking the money.

Abrams is not the right tank for this war. It's just expensive to operate and repair. Also much too heavy for the soft ground and rainy season as well. Russian tanks will do the job way better mainly bcz they have a pure HE Frag round specialized for anti-infantry, which the Abrams lack. If they can source Russian/Soviet made tanks they should opt for them.

@FlyingNazgul-wm1dv

2 ай бұрын

It's imposible for them to win. They fight EXACTLY the same as Russians further proving they're the same people btw ; so if they fight exactly the same it just becomes a numbers competition

The U.S. can't even make a decent car! 😂

Nick, you should drive one of those, and put your action where your mouth is😂

They are so ungrateful 😂 like we have some obligation to support them like some sugar daddy.. if the hadn’t all got rich of corruption the last how many years they could defend themselves!

1 tank?😅😂😅

@TigerWar1_

2 ай бұрын

I mean capturing a tank ist easy.

@MA-ri5he

2 ай бұрын

😂 On other foreign media sources there are thousands of tanks, equipment, munitions storages and weapons captured during the conflict.

@Stupiditas-stupido

2 ай бұрын

At least Russia captured several leopard tanks

@redbull1826

2 ай бұрын

They captured 3 from videos and destroyed around 1/3 of all the abrams supplied

@prodigiii712

2 ай бұрын

They destroyed 9 tanks in 2 weeks. Now they’ve been asked to stay away from the frontline.

Abrams is outdated tank unsuitable for advanced warfare without proper air support. Tanks in this day and age need to be equipped with incredible anti missiles and drone systems and have some form of air cover.

Proof that spending close to a Trillion dollars a year on your defense doesn't guarantee you anything. The defense contractors have been fleecing Americans for the 30 years and we are now realizing we didn't get jack for all that money spent, just made a bunch of contractors and congressmen rich.

Note: US brass always felt US Bradley's and Leppard tanks were best for Ukraine. 31 Abraham were given to help Germany feel better about allowing Leppard tanks go. .

@lindaSmith6588

2 ай бұрын

When I see reports like this it really obvious the author is not following the war.

@lindaSmith6588

2 ай бұрын

General Petraeus pointed out at the time Abraham are heavy, gas guzzlers and needed constant maintenance. But, no Abraham's no Leppards so . . . .

@TheHONKLER1488

2 ай бұрын

HI JOHNNY. SWITCHING NAMES AGAIN HUH? OOPS

@joecancer6013

2 ай бұрын

They don't use tanks. That's why it's abandoned. Tanks are getting destroyed by drones. Tanks are obsolete in modern warfare

In 2015 Obama refused to arm Ukraine because he said "Russia has the capacity for infinite escalation. No matter what we give, they can leapfrog that capability resulting in Ukraine never having an advantage and just being destroyed in the process." Obama was the highest IQ President probably since Nixon.

@bobwoods1302

2 ай бұрын

And yet here we are almost 10 years later and Russia is in trenches hiding.

@peterkruzlik2713

2 ай бұрын

@@bobwoods1302 😂😂👍

@yellowtunes2756

2 ай бұрын

​@@bobwoods1302 and yet Russia is outproducing the entire NATO and decimating the Ukrainian army. Sounds like "Ukraine never having advantage and just being destroyed in the process" to me

@bobwoods1302

2 ай бұрын

@@yellowtunes2756 You mean the "three day special military operation" I started over two years ago. NATO countries are still enjoying peacetime we have not ramped up to wartime production

@yellowtunes2756

2 ай бұрын

@@bobwoods1302 not a single Russian official ever said anything about 3 days or about any certain amount of time to do anything. So Obama was right, since after 2 years entire NATO wasn't able to ramp up production to help Ukraine win

I think that they are like 2 weeks late to the news

You mean we gave them a bunch of free tanks and weapons to use and they talking s***

THEY ARE PROBABLY AMAZED BY AMERICAN QUALITY. 😊

@enixword2637

2 ай бұрын

Yes. Amazed by how well they burn. Your delusion amazes me.

@fasztorta0001

2 ай бұрын

You Americans are so high up your asses