✅ SUPPORT OUR WORK! ➡ www.buymeacoffee.com/caeremoniale

Only one of the bishops from the First Session is still alive. Bishop José de Jesús Sahagún de la Parra, at that time Bishop of Tula, Hidalgo, México. Now he is 100 years old.

0:39 - Bishop Karol Wojtyla. 2:22 - Max Thurian and Roger Schultz 3:32 - Bishop Albino Luciani

We see the Karol Wojtyla, while he was a bishop. So incredible. Ad maiorem Dei gloriam!

@cbee8029

4 жыл бұрын

And a disaster he was for the church

@Krzemieniewski1

11 ай бұрын

​@@cbee8029100% agree but Francis is way worse.

3:13 Cardinal Rufino Santos of Philippines the first cardinal from Philippines

I see that St.John Paul II,the Pope is also on the Video at 0:41

Would be great to see a subtitled version of this.

The fathers of Trent and Vatican I would be proud indeed! A continuation of their great work.

@koljemcetnikepovoljno9027

3 жыл бұрын

I hope you are being sarcastic

@DrownedinDesigner

Жыл бұрын

@@koljemcetnikepovoljno9027 Vatican 2 is without error.

@bobcobb158

24 күн бұрын

@@koljemcetnikepovoljno9027 Sadly I don't think he is.

I am old enought to remember this. Who could have thought then that the results woud be so catastrophic?

Bellissimo documento, grazie.....

At 3:14 you see Cardinal Montini (the future Pope Paul VI) As well as Archbishop Karol Wojtyla (the future Pope John Paul II)

Wow imagine all the angels and archangels there during that time. St. Michael must have looked amazing as well.

Unica Iglesia catolica fundada por Nuestro Señor Jesucristo Rey de Reyes Señor de Señores No hay Otra. Water 💕 💧 amen8

concilio infernal

Excelente 👍 me alegra mucho. Gracias la acabo de colocar

Amo a San Juan XXIII

@miguellandaverde4818

3 жыл бұрын

el concilio vaticano II fue el mayor fracaso en toda la historia de la Iglesia Católica

English subtitles, please!

3:15 Cardinal Montini

@ioutube52

7 жыл бұрын

Yes, you are right!

@lordjesuschristhavemercyon3251

4 жыл бұрын

The weirdo!

@hectordanielsanchezcobo7713

3 жыл бұрын

@@lordjesuschristhavemercyon3251 who is now a Roman catholic saint

1619 arcivescovi e vescovi… oggi sono 5364. se domani fosse indetto un Concilio mi domando se San Pietro sarebbe abbastanza capiente……

Where is the Monseigneur Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre?;)

@robertoumburana

4 жыл бұрын

Certainly, he was there. It’s a historical fact. However, although someone may have claimed that he disagreed on some points not at all committed to Tradition, he signed the Minutes of the Council. He consented. Meanwhile, Abbé Georges de Nantes shouted like a saint against the innovations of this council until the end of his life in 2010, although he never considered the possibility of Sede Vacante. At times he rebuked Monsignor Lefebvre both before and after the episcopal consecrations. However, the world only seems to recognize SSPX as the soundness of the deposit of faith. A disgrace to Catholics who claim to be defenders of Tradition, while they are unaware of the grandiose figure that was the Father of Nantes. There is clearly a boycott so that his deep written works and effective actions fall into oblivion. He displeased both Lefebvrists, as sedevacantists, as well as Monsignor Guérard des Lauriers, among others, as those of the Post-conciliar Church itself. May God bless you and may the Blessed Virgin Mary always be at your side!

@MRO1970

3 жыл бұрын

Where is Bishop Martin Ngo Dinh Thuc

💧 💕 🙏!!Oh!Benedicto XVI sobrirdad y solenmidad Iglesia catolica 3 por Nuestro Señor Jesucristo Rey de Reyes Señor de Señores gracias

I like the music from "Orlando."

@RezaChity-G

4 жыл бұрын

Where can I find the music?

Where can we see more videos of vatican 2 lile this?

Bella l'apertura, però purtroppo l'interpretazione ha fatto di quei danni!

UNA PENTECOSTE MODERNA

Nome da música 00:08?

Come 7 patriarchi? Le Chiese Sui Iuris patriarcali sono 6: Maronita, Caldea, Sira, Melchita, Armena e Copta. O che il settimo è quello Latino di Gerusalemme (visto che il titolo di quelli di Venezia e Lisbona è onorifico ormai…) però nel video sono 6

there was only one vatican council

1:41

anyone know what music is playing in the backgroud?

@RezaChity-G

4 жыл бұрын

No, but I LOVE IT!

@d.s.2353

3 жыл бұрын

@@RezaChity-G kzread.info/dash/bejne/mImc0tSelNucZ84.html

Who is the bishop that they focus on at time 3:02?

@thatoneguy8064

Жыл бұрын

Albino Luciani, later John Paul I

Is Cardinal Rufino Santos here???

@charlespeterpadernal1490

7 жыл бұрын

Jesus Belleza yes he is

@gabrieljohnjuele4290

6 жыл бұрын

3:13 ? Yes he certainly is!

Without Concilium Vaticano today there was catolicans people in the world! Ave Pope John XXII!

Vatican II was fulfillment of Our Lady of La Salette "Rome will lose the faith and the Church will be in eclipse"

@Gratiman

6 жыл бұрын

Y se convertirá en la sede del anticristo

@tintedblue7827

6 жыл бұрын

Let us hope that when the current pontiff dies, a traditionalist cardinal will be elected in the conclave.

@andrewevaldo

5 жыл бұрын

In Indonesia, the fruits of Council are growing... Europe was too much sinking in their past vain glory of the Church

And thus formed the nWo

Si poteva risolvere diversamente

A consideration of Vatican II using the concepts of genus and species. Without getting into the historical background, inner workings and doctrinal details of the Vatican II documents and rather relying on what most Catholics know about it the following analogy I think is most revealing: Aristotle says that the natural way of learning and coming to know things is from the generic to the more specific. Just as when we see something moving in the distance we first identify it as a body and then as it moves closer an animal and even closer a man and finally as this particular person Socrates. Now it needs to be understood that there is a difference between our knowledge of a thing and the thing itself. Our knowledge is always more generic than the thing itself existing in reality which is very specific. If someone were to give the definition of the species of a thing instead of giving the definition of the genus of that thing one would give a more precise and fuller account of the thing. In other words the more specific our knowledge becomes of something the closer our knowledge resembles the thing. The truer our knowledge is, in the sense of having more truth - adeguatio res et intellectus. This is the natural way man comes to know. To try to move in the opposite direction is unatural and against human nature. To try to forget what one already KNOWS about something in order to know it more generically is an act of violence against oneself. It would entail force that goes against one's own nature. Now what is more generic and less specific is more universal. Whereas as what is more specific is more exclusive. In the same way when one says the word animal it can apply to many things. Where when one says man it excludes many things and applies to just one type of animal. Now things that exist in reality ARE NOT generic they are specific. The Church founded by Our Lord is a real existing reality. It is something specific with its own essential elements and properties. Now the Councils, pronouncements and doctrines through the ages became more and more specific. The Church's awareness of itself approached more and more the reality of its own being. It is impossible to move in the other direction. In other words it is impossible to move from a specific knowledge to a more general confused knowledge. A generic knowledge of anything is always more confused than a specific one, just as knowing something only in so far as it is an animal is more confused than knowing it specifically: a man. Instead our knowledge specifies as we gain acquantaince and experience of a thing. This should.not be confused with the knowledge particular persons had of the Church. Ofcourse the apostles and early Christians had a very specific knowledge of the Church. However the Church's formulated doctrine was not as specific. Throughout the centuries this doctrine became better formulated and more specific. This was neccesary especially to rule out heresy and error. A more generic knowledge on the other hand is more open to heresy and error. Now, in order for Vatican II to be less divisive, open to non Catholics and ALSO IN ORDER FOR THERE TO BE CONSENSUS AMONGST THE COUNCIL FATHERS, THE COUNCIL HAD TO REVERSE THE NATURAL PROCEDURE AND PROCLAIM SOMETHING MORE GENERIC THAN PREVIOUS COUNCILS. Now one could argue that the council taught no error. Entering into this debate is not easy and not for the most of us. However knowing that the council purposefully decided to be less specific and more generic is known by all of us. Can we say that a generic knowlwdge of a thing is deficient compared to a fuller specific knowlwdge of a thing? Trying to go against oneself and forget what one once knew creates the impression that one must have been wrong once upon a time. Because why else would one try to forget what once knew? Especially if what one once knew one used to think was valuable and true, a treasure to be safeguarded. How many people do we know who have used Vatican II to look back and interpret older Councils? Anything more specific than the Council is frowned upon as superfluous and outdated. But does truth age? Never the less can we blame them for acquiring this habit when this is a natural consequence of artificially regressing and not progressing in knowledge? Of trying to be less specific and more generic. I leave you to draw the conclusions.

@karlheven8328

8 ай бұрын

Very interesting. But what should they have done instead?

Where is Archbishop Lefebre?

The abomination of the desolation.... The start of the debacle. But Christ will rescue His Church at the end.

@robertoumburana

4 жыл бұрын

You are absolutely right. Let us pray that Pope Francis will convert entirely to the Catholic faith or that a future pope will submit to the deposit of faith.

John XXlll. (the second one) said "Gaudet Mater Ecclesia". 50 years on, under Bergogoglio, the Mother is in chains of scandal and communism. And we all pray that God take this shame away from his Bride. Our sacred Mother is in pain. And Bergogoglio is not the cure.

@cesarfebres-corderoloyola3729

4 жыл бұрын

Kristijan Ahčin repent and submit to the Pope

@DAOFB

4 жыл бұрын

😂 Are your really worried about "communism" in the church?! Just think about, what this word in its purest understanding means. And think about what else but "communism" the realm of God is? Everything is provided for you according to your needs. Everything you do, should be for the higher love of God and your fellow people... Communism in church is quiet its essence.

Ma i due che si siedono sui gradini?

An impressive council but it needs to be clarified and the rubrics of the Mass corrected world wide. Remove the church of nice and return it to God.

BIG MISTAKE!

@johncronin9540

9 ай бұрын

With respect, I disagree. What were the real drivers of change were the two World Wars, (especially the second conflict) which brought about a massive loss of support and trust in core institutions, such as government, religious leadership, and many other long established institutions. Just look at the nightmare those institutions had caused to a global population. Also, in the aftermath, massive numbers of people had access to higher education, as the old, aristocratic order collapsed. Just look at the sheer number of royal dynasties which disappeared. And after such catastrophes- war, genocide, large numbers of civilian deaths (in WWII, more civilians died than soldiers), and people were no longer going to just blindly trust and obey the institutions which led them into such catastrophe. This was going to happen, council or no council. It’s why the 1960s were so convulsive. Besides, in the wake of the Shoah (Holocaust), Nostra Aetate was absolutely vital and necessary. The problem was that the reform in the Church’s governmental structure wasn’t nearly enough, as evidenced by the hierarchy’s corrupt handling of the child abuse scandal, in which the hierarchy, on a global scale, covered up the abuse by clerics, in a culture of secrecy and lies, thus allowing a minority of offenders to violate and abuse who knows how many children. How can anyone in the hierarchy claim to be moral beacons when the faithful learned of their cover-up of terrible crimes, on such a massive scale?

@karlheven8328

5 ай бұрын

​@@johncronin9540Your thinking is all political and not institutionally catholic with regards to spiritual and religious formation. I recommend reading Lefebrves main works 'They unthrowned him' and ' I accuse the Council'. In these books everything one needs to know is explained in great detail and it is very relevant still today

@klivityloja3067

5 ай бұрын

THE PAPAL AUDIENCE CHAMBER IS A SNAKE!!!!! NO CAMERA TRICKERY. THE WHOLE FN BUILDING. YEAH, BIG MISTAKE BUT I IMAGINE THE MISTAKE HAPPENED WAY BEFORE V2

Vatican II Church aping holy Mother Church has its coming out party

Vatican II - Sum Ting Wong.

Il concilio del disastro.

Traducir Español

Very sad day for the church.

👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤its me joel ellein phoe the vathican churh, bkit lagi si joel phoe binabang git phoe,,,, thanks2 all pope the cristhian chatolic hnde nila pina pabayaan si jesus phoe,

Visitations are still happening from Our Lady Queen of Heaven. It's wrong to spread doubts to believers. Have an opinion, yes. But don't stand in the way of others beliefs.

Actually secundum doesn't means second it means 'according' in Latin. Example ad Secundum scripturas means according to the scriptures. However not every fruit of the Vatican 2 is successful that's very sad!

@hectordanielsanchezcobo7713

3 жыл бұрын

It can mean both things

@luxio369

2 жыл бұрын

ehm not in this case

@leonardodavid2842

2 жыл бұрын

“Secundum” means both “Second” and “According to”. So does it in Italian. “Secondo” means both “Second” and “According to”. Both, “Secundum” and “Secondo” also mean Second in term of time (as does it english, though this because of mathematics not latin).

@DrownedinDesigner

Жыл бұрын

Means both in all Romance languages

They do like to dress up. such a rich church.

@ClavesCoelorum

Жыл бұрын

You must have a very narrow view of life.

Gaude mater ecclesia

0:42 Bishop Woytila - Saint John Paul II

Not a woman in sight.

@eliwhaley4804

Жыл бұрын

duh

depressing

Prestemos honra a Dom Castro Mayer e Dom Marcel Lefevre, por não se entregarem aos crucificadores, aos revolucionários.

I was born 1960 .Thank you for stealing my Catholic formation. I still suffer.. I found sedevacantism, but am so faaaaaaar behind. And you all hid Blessed Virgin Mary from me... She was too Catholic. Folly! I NEEDED HER!

Ruined the Church sadly.

In the Book of Revelations of the Bible, it is said that the Church will be destroyed because her sins have massed up clear to heaven. trust me the Church is anything but DIVINE. God has NO AFFILIATION with the Church. He is going to destroy her because she gets drunk off the blood of the innocent. How? She blesses wars and those who go into battle. War is still the #1 killer of mankind.

@daphneslater5400

9 жыл бұрын

Daphne Slater Read the Whole 18th Chapter of Revelation. that whole entire chapter is speaking of the DEMISE OF THE CHURCH.

@hectordanielsanchezcobo7713

3 жыл бұрын

Where does it say anything about the Church being destroyed???

Thanks be to God for Vatican II.

@markymarcb4932

9 жыл бұрын

"If the Church were not divine, the (Vatican II) Council would have buried Her." - Cardinal Siri.

@DerrekGarcia

8 жыл бұрын

It's true, the Council was a mistake

@anguskirk4696

7 жыл бұрын

agreed the council is the killer of all that is catholic

@WishingAngel

6 жыл бұрын

Zimatar Amen +

@PatrickBOng-dq4ex

6 жыл бұрын

Wishing Angel I agree with you.

A cult

LONG LIVE THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL! LONG LIVE THE PREVIOUS SUPREME PONTIFF (SAINT JOHN XXII)! NO MORE FIRST VATICAN COUNCIL ANYMORE! NO MORE TLM ANYMORE!

@georgepenton808

5 жыл бұрын

Brother Patrick, if you feel that way, why don't you just join a Protestant church?

@Schöpf_at

4 жыл бұрын

LONG LIVE POPE SAINT URBAN II & PIUS X !!! DOWN WITH FREEMASON, ILUMINATI & ALL ANTICHRIST MINIONS !!! AVE MARIA !!! VIVA CRISTO REY !!! ...there you have it...

@koljemcetnikepovoljno9027

3 жыл бұрын

Father you are a heretic and a novus ordo lunatic

@fidefidelis4460

3 жыл бұрын

You are crazy, just learn what beautiful things Benedict XVI did.

I see finery, I see riches, I see humans, human actions, humans doing ceremonies. It's all human action. Every action in the world is humans. Human do and it happens. Human does not do and it does not happen. No gods, no holy pigeon and no imaginary jesus. It's all human. Humans mate and kids are born. They're not created, by something un-provable, and invisible (they're all invisible...all the churches things it made up conveniently are invisible). The soul is invisible, The church is all about made up stuff, ALL invisible and one is not to know all this, but to believe all this. That's the requirement. Not knowledge but believe. That's how religion and bullshit works. And you are not to test them. Why? Because if you test bullshit, you'll find that it's all bullshit. Same thing with a made up god. You' should not test it. I cannot even believe this. People always test and verify. That's how one KNOWS. When a house is bought, you verify that the owner really owns the house. You verify there's no mortgage. This is done with everything. When a person applies to work as a doctor in a hospital, he's verified he's a real doctor. When you apply for a job, you're asked to produce qualifications. When new medicine is being discovered, it's tested. That's how one knows the truth. Believe does not work that way. You're told something and you believe it. You'r told that there are fairies and you believe. That's the only requirement which when you think of it (believers cannot rationalize this because their ability to think like this has been robbed from them and replaced by faith, it's really stupid. Behold the Roman Catholic Church, the biggest con artist in the world and millions upon millions fall for it. Luckily people have started to being educated. It's hard because the sly church has hijacked so many things. Even the language. Parents have been poisoned, and they in turn poison their children. They have no choice. How the hell can an infant choose a religion? It's shoved very violently down the infant's throat and it's not open for debate. That's religion. That's the mafia tactic.

And thats how Satan entered the church