Vanishing Public Administration: What Does It Mean and What Should We Do About It?

Price Governance Salon
We are pleased to welcome Distinguished Professor and Editor-in-Chief of Public Administration Review, James L. Perry for his talk, Vanishing Public Administration: What Does It Mean and What Should We Do About It?
Abstract:
In a recent speech, Paul Volcker, former chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and a highly respected voice for public service, was asked to examine whether United States governing bodies are meeting the needs of our citizens. His answer was definitive and short: “The current state of our governance bodies is poor. Quite simply, they are not meeting the needs of our citizens.” Although Volcker spread blame for the failing widely, one governance institution about which he is particularly concerned is our public administration. Have we lost our capacity to do the business of government? Are we no longer capable of executing our public policies? My presentation seeks to illuminate the question: Is public administration vanishing? In answering this question, I draw upon research and experience, especially my own of the last forty years. I also draw from my special vantage point of the last three years as Editor in Chief of Public Administration Review, now in its 75th year of publication.
James L. Perry is Distinguished Professor and Chancellor’s Professor of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, and World Class University Distinguished Professor at Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. He is also Adjunct Professor of Philanthropic Studies and Political Science at Indiana University. He currently serves as Editor-in-Chief of Public Administration Review.
Perry’s recent research focuses on performance pay in government, public service motivation, community and national service, and government reform.

Пікірлер: 3

  • @adistyachairani9638
    @adistyachairani96383 жыл бұрын

    The Public Administration in many developed countries still struggle with coping with the issues of balancing its professional function with political dynamic. The idea of public administration (PA) in delivering public services to fullfil public demands and needs, at many time backfired with the political interests they have to deal with, and to be fullfiled. So, when PA failed to deliver at certain level of performance appraisal they could not be held responsible, but nonetheless PA would suffered with lack of public trust on the institution. To excecute public policy, and implement program, the PA relly on certain sets of regulations and procedures. The processes with which they working on. To certain level they would have to reviews its regulations and procedures (or processes) through times. The arguments here is how to best delivered, how to have the program dan policy implemented effectively. But that is two different questions and issues, how it delivered and how it has effective results. To differentiate the PA processes from the political dynamics could be the way the PA could be more professional, but it’s almost impossible, to separated between the two, atleast from the time being sadly.

  • @simranjitsingharora3657
    @simranjitsingharora36578 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant.

  • @cecethomas3915
    @cecethomas39158 жыл бұрын

    I wish he wouldn't take so long to get to the point.