This information is good, but I am angry that you misleadingly claim a supersonic passenger jet has taken flight. I block channels who use Clickbait titles and thumbnails.

Ten years work to achieve 273mph at 7000ft. Is Boeing involved?

This isn't a supersonic passenger jet. It is a test article designed to take one passneger past the speed of sound. It is intended to provide test data that will enable a new supersonic passneger jet in the future. Beautiful looking aircraft though.

@berniemccann8935

Ай бұрын

... the non-existent future.

@lloydrmc

Ай бұрын

A380s aren't selling, either.

@EBaker0129

Ай бұрын

I cant stand the way these clips intro's dont match the story. The title is bullshit!!!

@daleleggette

Ай бұрын

Watch the whole video.. it explains all that

@martinpowell3855

Ай бұрын

Well since they have stopped building them it's not really a suprise is it 🧐

Cool plane, but why go to the trouble of creating an interesting story only to poison it with a false headline?

@babayao1180

2 күн бұрын

Click bait

This is a LONGGGG way from a "supersonic passenger jet!"

I hope this technology will make the world an even smaller village.

America wouldn't accept the British concord and now they will claim they invented the super sonic passenger jet

no way yet a passenger aircraft just a prototype to test its feasibility. You yanks !

Bring back the Concorde, it already holds passengers.

They need to partner with boeing, because they are so awesome and have a great safety record

Lovely to hear that you are using RUNWAY, and the voice of Vincent 🙂

The more I look at this plane the more beautiful it gets.

I love and am proud of my country the beautiful USA.

@seekeroftruth1200

4 күн бұрын

RFK, Jr. should be the next POTUS.

A plane for multi-millionaires ... only they could afford the ticket price.

It’s like a teeny weeny tiny British Concord……which was designed in the 60’s and flew from the 70’s….that’s progress!

👍👍👍 But I will never be able to afford a flight 😔

Remember the TSR2 - this looks like that

@annosborne7365

4 күн бұрын

We could have made a fortune with the tsr2 but the Labour government scrapped it

Presumably because this supersonic plane is American Congress won't block it from landing the USA😂

Beautiful

back of the napkin -- three J85's just barely produce as much thrust as a single F404, which is mounted on trainers like the T-7A, which is itself barely supersonic. So I guess that checks out, the XB-1 is probably trimmed of as much weight as possible so that those J85's can do the job for these tests.

Looks like a lawn dart that grew up and got an engine. Any resemblance to an XB-70 is not a coincidence.

Cantik dan menakjubkan

What will make this aircraft better than the Concorde? I saw/read somewhere that the sonic boom won't be so loud.

A beautiful bird....continue to test and develop this marriage of technologies to perfection.

I didn’t read all the comments, but I didn’t see anything about using carbon fiber for the fuselage. That Titanic sub IMploded under high water pressure because of carbon fiber stressed over time (could be a lie but that’s what I read) - doesn’t that put this aircraft at risk of EXploding at high altitude in low air pressure? it won’t go BOOM on the first flight…

Why not develop it on the base of a B1 bomber? First improve the fuselage and the size, then insert better jet engines. Then improve the shape to avoid sonic boom.

This is a glossy take on something far in the future. I am wholly unconvinced.

Looks a bit Small for a "passenger jet"

BEST OF LUCK 👍👍👍🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 BEST WISHES FROM PAKISTAN

Sarawak in East Malaysia and Japanese Company is producing SAF ( Sustainable Aviation Fuel ) clean environmental for future aircraft fuel.....

I saw something flying similar some 70 years ago…

I's BOOM the best name for an aircraft? Just saying ...

@berniemccann8935

Ай бұрын

Probably, a Boeing version named Boing !

@alanbreeze4731

Ай бұрын

What about BUMP when the company collapses

It will be interesting to learn what the fuel cost per passenger per kilometre is. This first flight of the prototype is encouraging. Wait for the flight of a full scale example of this jet to learn if will achieve the aims of its designers.

Interesting video, but it's a pity about the ridiculous "Clickbait" title, and a project name that will likely raise a lot of opposition to the idea of another SST! Also, it would be good to have a commentary that could pronounce Concorde correctly and didn't sound so incredulous at the first flight's maximum speed of 273 mph at a staggering 7,120 feet. WOW!!

I think it's fine, good effort to design a supersonic airliner. BUT what about the economics ? NASA is currently in the test phase of trying to change a supersonic boom to a thump, which is a key economic factor, allowing supersonic flight over land. This was a problem for the concorde,. If range issues can be dealt with in the full scale design allowing flights over the Pacific, then they may have a chance.

We go to New era

SOOOOI MANY ERRORS IN THIS. Hire an editor.

BOOM

It is way behind the BAC 221

Interesting development, but I expect the money will chase X-59 based follow-ons. There was a limited market for Concorde, but it had a lot of government subsidies (UK & France). I believe the subsidies amounted to $8000 per passenger, not a good proposition.

We will see the return of supersonic flight it is just a question of time. Yes the video title is a bit misleading, and yes the XB-1 is a flying test bed, but things are moving in the right direction. That is one beautiful plane prototype or not.

Should have called it Zoom instead :D

What a big deal. You are reinventing the wheel 😂

Nothing more than click bait! So sad, I was actually rooting for them at one time. The real plane should actually be ready around 2060.

Passenger Jet with one seat at a time when missiles are hypersonic .... ? don't quite get the point ...

Similar to the TSR2 design

There is no need for a supersonic passenger jet let’s get real😂

Boeing Had nothing to do with this right?

This effort by Boom Supersonic to eventually develop and sell a commercial supersonic passenger transport jet will still have two of the big problems that the Concorde Supersonic jet had. One problem is that the ticket price will be very high, so that only a very limited group of people will use this airplane for travel. The second problem is that traveling at Supersonic Speed will have very high fuel consumption. As a result I suspect that at the most only a few of these Supersonic airplanes will ever be made and used.

It a Valuable to develop to achieve technology but it is a high cost to keep up to maintain the Value. Learn from the disaster of Concorde. Life is more valuable than pursuing advanced technology. We are not in the Time Zone yet.

I would love to see it happen. BUT. It will be too small to make enough money for the airlines. The Concorde only held 100 people, was very small inside, and the ticket cost was amazingly high! and it still lost money every year. I think near the very end they jacket up the cost of a ticket to the point it actually made some money but the cost of a ticket was so high only the very rich individuals and corporations could even come close to buying a ticket. With an airplane only capable of seating less than 100 might have great technology it will never make a profit!!

So it trims a couple hours to go across the pond. And it chugs fuel. And max 80 passengers. Not sustainable.

Just leave it Elon. He will work it out.

At the current rate of development, the future regulation compliance and engineering/material hurdles my estimate the Click Bait title will more likely be honest and valid in about another 15 to 20 years.

273mph/430kmh is not very fast.

😢yea, boom sound one freighway experience

Everything that we learn advances the technology that we already know. It can be used in everything we already do to improve everything for everyone. It's how science advances everything. Their is no fail, its how much better. Perfection has a higher price, and that is what is being paid now. JMHO --gary

I see a single member of the flight crew, but where are the passengers? 😜

I believe 😮this news

*Another Nonsense Documentary, What are You Looking to Achieve ?*

Without a credible and efficient engine, SST is just a dream, or a nightmare for its investors.

@knsubramanian9837

7 күн бұрын

It is not the question of “credible engine” !. It is the “ sonic boom “ that must be suppressed or reduced to the level of normal subsonic aircraft!. Otherwise,building a supersonic passenger aircraft is not difficult!.Remember the concord which flew first in 1971 at Mach 2 speed! Concord flew for more than 30 years!.

How many people can it carry!?

@berniemccann8935

Ай бұрын

I guess that you didn't listen to the video.

There is only one plain concord simple

NOT a new jet - a test vehicle ONLY. False advertising.

Most people can never afford to fly in one. So, it will never serve their needs.

Thumbs down for misleading headline.

I say cut some of the cost and build this jet now

It'll never fly. The "silent" Overture airliner would encounter too much expense in getting all the approvals it would need, to carry passengers. No private company could afford it or ever make a profit on it. The only reason the Concorde was able to go into service was the huge subsidies provided by the British and French governments. Billionaires didn't get their money by making foolish expenditures of their capital.

One of the reasons Concorde failed was because the ticket cost was to high for most people. So not enough passengers...start losing money..end of buisness...Yes there were other factors...as I said "One of the reasons"..(the crash being the final nail in the coffin).This will be aimed at the rich..but as Concorde proved...that don't always work...Even Concorde had to make short pleasure flights (still not cheap) in an attempt to make money..It's why we had the 747 and now A380...Get more people in the air in the same amount of time reduces cost of tickets..and so more can fly keeping a steady flow of customers.

@kapjay6568

24 күн бұрын

This is for "creamy layer" customers. So dont compare pricing, market to that of jet blue or southwest 😂😂😂😂

The plane shown in vedio is not capable to carry passenger

Please AI, do not call her "the" Concorde.

Misleading headline! 😖😖😖😖

PLAZMA HAJTÓMŰVEL ŰRHAJÓ IS LEHETNE!

Looks like Concorde🇬🇧🤨

The name “Boom “ is better then Boeing”

@AmericanBadger

Ай бұрын

@@MatthewGuzman-yo2ew Lately, when I hear the word boom in the context of the aircraft industry, I think first of Boeing.

Engineers wait too long to improve technology.

There is only one supersonic passenger made: the concorde.

@lloydrmc

Ай бұрын

@@jonpetter8921 ...Concorde used to be made. In the 70s

@jonpetter8921

Ай бұрын

@@lloydrmc It was the only working supersonic passenger made.

@lloydrmc

Ай бұрын

@@jonpetter8921 ...in the 70s

@jonpetter8921

Ай бұрын

@@lloydrmc Do you have anything better ?

👍

Personallee i'm a Pull back on le throttel to go faster sort ov piolet myself

c l i c k b a i t

Made by Boeing. Ups!

that is nothing . TOFU will copy it in 2 days .

Slower than Concorde, and maybe less passengers, plus no explanation of "No Sonic Boom"

I don’t like it, too expensive and take too long to build.

Pure babble - too many flawed arguments to cite. This design cannot be scaled up to a passenger configuration. Naming the engine over-ture does not help with the conceptualization JR

Banned French Super sonic but this one is legal?

Mmmmm...

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤very very good happy ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

What are feet and miles? You’re on the www.

crap. waiting to long!

More lies

B F D

goofy as plane. bring out the anti gravity crafts!!

👎 and non subscribe until you speak metric or both.

GREAT. Keep going. Make America PROUD.