Those T-38s sure do look like like MiG 28s😂

@ExecuteBrandon

3 ай бұрын

You’ve got security clearance, you can read about it!

@halfpintcustoms3428

2 ай бұрын

That’s closer 😆

@iceman9678

2 ай бұрын

They're flying in ATC formation in combat so it must be. Let me confirm on my 360 degree F14 radar.

@GrumpyNCO

Ай бұрын

​@@ExecuteBrandonI have my security clearance. Where do I read about it?

The upgraded T-38 with advanced avionics and upgraded engines is the T-38C. The T-38A is the legacy version that has been around since the 60's.

I’d say something about Boeing, but I want to live!

There never was an official P-51 trainer, and the less than a dozen field modification aircraft, TP-51C, were not used after WW2.

@wingmanjim6

2 ай бұрын

However, post war Temco TF51s and civilian conversions were used in a few instances, Stallion 51s TFs were under contract to the government for certain test pilot training missions.

Recently, Boeing has been in a lot of trouble, including with the T-7A, because its production is really behind schedule. Besides, the T-7a is not supersonic. Its maximum speed is 0.97 sound speed.

Partly designed and made by SAAB, Sweden. A perfect collaboration 👍🏻

@ExecuteBrandon

3 ай бұрын

Boeing + Saab… 😂😂

@PK-il8xm

3 ай бұрын

65% of the aircraft is SAAB. Produced in Indiana.

@ExecuteBrandon

3 ай бұрын

@@PK-il8xm Even worse… lol

@jvs9467

Ай бұрын

@@ExecuteBrandonzzzzzzzzz

4:26 "the highly advanced digital design process..." as an engineer measures a part using dial calipers

Apart from the tail, looks a lot like the Hawk which the RAF has been using for years

@oxcart4172

2 ай бұрын

U mean the jet at the beginning? That's because it is a Hawk!

Interesting new plane. Sounds like a good addition.

I think BOEING will have learnt a lot from this collaboration. It may well also influence how they build the software for their commercial jets.

@Arturo4586

2 ай бұрын

"They build software", it is one individual, You try to ckeck the thousands of lines of instructions one programmer writes , besides, most of the electronics are OCP's

Super interesting aircraft! Thanks for the video and explanations. 😊😊😊😊😊❤❤❤❤❤ 😎

An armed version of this jet would be ideal for low budget airforces and a good competitor for KAI FA-50 block 20.

@user-gv7xc7mx9q

2 ай бұрын

아음속기가 어떻게 FA50의 경쟁자가 된다는건지? T7은 그냥 정찰기나 훈련기정도밖에 못씀

@jensolsson9666

Ай бұрын

It already excist. But with other wings. It is called Gripen C.

Hopefully the panels are more secure than those on the passenger aircraft.

This jet has the potential to be a light fighter in league with Saab Gripen, FA-50, JF17, Tejas. Exportable to countries that can’t afford F16.

@dominic6634

Ай бұрын

Ive often thought about that

@rectalvapor2234

Ай бұрын

You're mixing apples and oranges here; it may double as a light attack aircraft, like the FA-50, but expecting it to become a first rate multi role aircraft is just wishful thinking.

@asinglemaleinuk

25 күн бұрын

The Saab Gripen is outstanding, versatile and sturdy.

If it's Boeing then I'm not going.

@r123154

3 ай бұрын

I Love It . I say it everytime i have to fly . Always have , always will. Go Boeing..

@asdrubalanibal6853

3 ай бұрын

It’s a Saab. Boeing added its name when “partnering” to produce it domestically for the US military and the Global Market.

@exit1368

2 ай бұрын

@alanbadilla7003 ??? Are you going to pass up your USAF pilot training slot & potential career in military aviation because of this contractor? 🤭 LOL 👎

@alanbadilla7003

2 ай бұрын

@@exit1368 yes

@thetigerstripes

2 ай бұрын

🤣😂😆👍🏻

Wooow! How much I love to get trained with this beautiful!

That is a cute little jet

Looks like it would be a joy to fly. Looks right. I have not read any comments below.

Lol "digital design has sped up delivery process".... T-7 is years behind schedule....😂

@jakobholgersson4400

2 ай бұрын

The program itself has been delayed for many years, but the T-7 was developed very quickly. It's delayed by a few months only.

The T-38 / F-5 is a beautiful little jet! The Red Hawk should be one of our mult-role fighters, it's beautiful as well! Kudos for the recognition of the Tuskegee Airmen! They were the best escort fighters! The most highly decorated flying squadron in the European theater!

I like it. I think our back up forces should be reliable and affordable instead of so high tech and expensive. IMHO.

Great to see the heads up to the Red tails!

@gaddyify

3 ай бұрын

👍👍👍👍

This'll never replace anything but the talon trainer. It's extremely limited. Was designed to be cheap and easy to maintain. And the old days of the freedom fighters market are gone

Saab had already built the plane. Boeing just licensed them.

@rectalvapor2234

Ай бұрын

I think the word you're looking for is designed, not built, but no - I'm fairly certain this was a joint project from day one where Saab and Boeing designed the trainer together.

excellent video as usually. thank you.

確かに、小型でドローンを破壊する戦闘機って必要かも。

Make sure you give the pilot some duct tape and super glue to make sure parts don't fall off 😊😊😊

@jinkenz6459

3 ай бұрын

ejector seats. LOLOL.

@omarjassar4650

3 ай бұрын

@@jinkenz6459 it's a Boeing

@DanDan-os6hd

3 ай бұрын

Your not the smartest knife in the drawer obviously. ​@@omarjassar4650

They are finally putting the T38 out to pasture. It was one of the first jets I as a kid fell for. My dad took me to see the Thunderbirds and they were flying T38s. I wonder how much one would cost you?

Informative video

Looking like Yugoslav G4 except two tail back !(?)

Jeeze...I'm sure the taxpayer got 'a real deal'.

They're still testing the T-7A when USAF could've flying their new trainer if they chose the T-50A.

@craigjones2162

3 ай бұрын

Not necessarily. The holdup is the ejection seat 💺 for lighter pilots. I.E. women

@paulsteaven

3 ай бұрын

@@craigjones2162 that problem has been fixed by KAI/Lockheed Martin decades ago. Female ROKAF fighter pilots uses their T-50 in LIFT.

The Red-Hock? What ever it is called, it is truly beautiful.

legal! Mas acho que a fuselagem é inferior a do f22 e f35.

I think there's 4 arresting wires..and number 3 being consider the best to hit..

Not sure about the P-51 stuff - but will always love my F-20, F-5, T-38!!!!

But it's a Boenig!!

@lorimarcopulos7576

3 ай бұрын

Spellcheck? Last I heard it was "BOEING"

The test pilot must have balls of steel to get in a Boeing

I have the Red Hawk in the VR sim and it is awesome.

The fact that it is not yet operational 8 years after its first flight is an embarrassment. It took less than 4 years from first flight to operational for the F15.

@chrisgoblin4857

2 ай бұрын

I've read that in the short time of development of the F-15, 2.5 million man hours of work took place. That's insane but it was seen as a huge priority for the USAF at the time with the perceived threat of the Foxbat. I'm sure the amount of man hours allocated to a trainer will be a lot less than a mainstay strike fighter with the capability of the F-15. I do agree though, they are definitely taking their time.

@Scottsguards

2 ай бұрын

Too much bureaucratic BS now, plus too many folks on the hill canceling projects with de-funding. The Chinese just built 10 590' missile cruisers in 48 months, think about it!!!

“boieng, boieng… boieng 🏀 boieng!!!”

I totally understand the Military for investing in trainer aircraft’s with more and more advanced fighters going single seater having a two seater trainer aircraft will help tremendously with flight training of pilots

@asquare9316

2 ай бұрын

all trainers have always been 2 seaters, at least since WWI.

hope the wheels don't fall off lol

The P51 was never used as a basic trainer.

The United States Air Force was not established until 1947.

"This has drastically sped up the delivery process for the aircraft" (4:40) says the company which is now at least two years behind on its first delivery...☺

The A-10 Thunderbolt II is a beautiful supersonic all-weather stealth fighter aircraft~♥

@parthasur6018

3 ай бұрын

The A10 It is a subsonic ground attack aircraft.

@craigjones2162

3 ай бұрын

Supersonic... LMAO 😅

@gregparrott

3 ай бұрын

Whoa! While I'm sure you're trolling, you're right that the Warthog is beautiful in its own right. The TOP SPEED of the A-10 is 420 MPH. The transition between subsonic and supersonic is at 767 MPH (at sea level pressures) So, you're a tad short of supersonic - by 347 MPH to be reasonably precise

@gregparrott

3 ай бұрын

Evidently, you've yet to hear about the latest stealth, supersonic Cessna.

@ratanroy5699

3 ай бұрын

U chikii that's new tactics to get attentions

Folland Gnat pilots: "Hold my beer..."

👍

Jim bede would be proud of his bd10

So cool to see the red tale airmen the T GUYS

Make sure all bolts are tighten and no extra bolts on the ground. Lol.

Artificial intelligence will soon replace these pilots.

@amykuehnl8463

3 ай бұрын

Drones

Da ist ja unser Alpha- Jet genau so gut...... Haben wir noch welche irgendwo herumstehen !? ♥️🇩🇪👍

Why not US make a WAR version of this for the Philippine Air Force. With features intended for Naval defense and naval interception. Large fuel tanks and can carry anti ship missiles. And electronic warfare system. It doesn't need to make dogfight or air to air battle as it will be the job of the US supplied SAM's, it just need enough speed to back away after delivering its ordnance and the SAMS will do it's job when the enemy catches up. We need at least 120 Units of this jets to cover the entire WPS.

The P-51 Mustang was widely used as a trainer?? Where did that come from? There were rare two seat conversions during WW2 but never a fleet of TP-51s that i know of. Civilian owned P-51s have been converted to two seaters to provide flight experiences and to sell rides. Makes me wonder what else the vid gets wrong

@jct1616

3 ай бұрын

regarding the TP-51C two seat trainer, Found this exact quote on several websites: “The TP-51C was a field modification that added a second seat with a full second set of controls and instrumentation that could be used for training purposes. There were at least 5 TP-51Cs that were built during WWII for training purposes, and VIP transport.”

@RichNotWealthy

3 ай бұрын

@@jct1616 Yes, 5 TP-51s. But this vid gives the impression that the USAF used Mustangs widely as trainers until they were retired. The last Mustang in USAF service was an F-51D of the WVANG. Retired in 1957. If the vid creators felt the need to review past trainers there were several piston engine trainers more appropriate to a discussion of training aircraft. The T-6 and T-28 for instance

@charleslee58

2 ай бұрын

Tom Cruz has one

@williamallmon3713

2 ай бұрын

Exactly right. The Mustangs were not used as trainers! 6:31

@jct1616

2 ай бұрын

@@williamallmon3713 the video is 100% correct about Trainer Mustangs. TP-51 existed as fighter pilot trainers with controls in BOTH Front and Back passengers long after WWII until enough Jet Trainers were built in the 1960s. Some confusion comes from regular mustangs center seat tank removed allowing room for a passenger, but with no flight controls. This is what Tom Cruise owns. Toms mustang was built in 1946 as a P-51K modified to appear like WWII iconic p-51D but with center tank removed allowing for a passenger seat (no flight controls in back) Found this quote with a bit of search “After WWII, the USAAF consolidated much of its fighter aircraft. Most piston powered fighters served substantially reduced roles as more advanced jet powered aircraft emerged. The Mustang still proved useful serving in the Korean War and state-side in the Air Force Reserves and National Air Guard. TF-51D Mustangs (two-seat trainers) were used to train fighter pilots until the jet-trainers such as the T-33 Shooting Star were fully utilized.”

Keren sayapnya.

The folks who put these things out should do more research. The P51 was not a trainer inWW2 or after. There have always been dedicated training aircraft like the Piper Cub, the AT6 Texan and so on.

The T-7 as a replacement for the F-16! 😂😂😂😂 Yea, right! The F-16 would wax that back side!

Looks like the BD-10

I heard the canopy will just depart the airframe at a whim.

To save money, Boeing is using 737 parts. Ultimate pilot training.

Looks like a SAAB

@Georgi_Slavov

2 ай бұрын

And T-50

What is the difference between an F5E and a T38 talon?

@mojoron

3 ай бұрын

Leading edge and hardpoints if I remember correctly

@MrRipper1956

2 ай бұрын

A T-38 is a two-seat advanced flight training aircraft with a later added capability for weapons to drop practice bombs. An F-5E was a single-seat adaptation of the T-38 with internal guns, external fuel, and bomb capability. The USAF and USN used the F-5s in the 1970-90s as adversary air for combat training against other aircraft. There was a 2 seat fighter version, the F-5F for conversion fighter training, and a proposed F-5G. That was a single-engine fighter proposal for a low-cost alternative to the F-16, renamed as the F-20.

It's a good trainer but not in the same league as the Aeralis Advanced Jet Trainer. Just you wait and see!

Why does the gear look sooooo messed up?!

In 1984, I was in Basic Training at Ft. Sill, OK. My Unit was Alpha Btry, 1st Cannon Training Battalion, 1st Armored Division. My Barracks were the First in the line of Dozens. Across the field, and highway, was an Airforce Training unit, with T-80's landing, taking off, and touch and go's all day and night. It was pretty cool to watch.

Wow! Are main gear from F-16?

@skyhi9h

3 ай бұрын

From f35. Mostly electronic systems.

@Timbothruster-fh3cw

3 ай бұрын

​@SkyhighStarlight The main gear is from the F-16!

@skyhi9h

3 ай бұрын

@@Timbothruster-fh3cw Main gear you mean what? Like hydraulics, avionics or electronics?

...i want a mustang.

those were some choppy VR computers,, id never

Hmm, this Jet looks like an Alpha Jet, but a little bit faster.

Can you add a few more DEI comments into the video?

@problactive285

2 ай бұрын

Add deez to your chin.

@lisaroberts8556

Ай бұрын

@@problactive285DEI Humor triggers you that much? 🤡

At least the doors can't fall off!

In fact it looks like an Alpha Jet of Dornier

Of all the air combat units through the years that contributed MUCH more than the "Tuskegee airmen" were "chosen" to be tributed with the red tail.they painted aircraft in that manner to indicate they were novice aviators to be avoided

The U.S. should just bring back the a4 sky hawk, revised of course.

BOEING . . .One can only wonder if parts were installed in reverse order, if they were installed at all. Quality control seems to have gone by the wayside lately with those folks . . .

They are trying to make sure the door don't fly off.only flying airbus from now on.i don't want to die

T-38… aka MiG-28 from Top Gun. 😂

T-7 Red Hawk trainer developed by Boeing and Swedish Saab.

🇺🇸😇🙏🕊️👍🦅💪

that is what i miss in europ i woud cancelk al compbat helicoper programs for a high end groundatac as multirollelight jetcraft , ...

Boeing?! Oh no! Ruuunnn!!!

最新の入札を通った新型の超音速練習機って奴では？ 最初にプロペラ機などで規定時間習熟飛行したら、超音速機で練習、空軍パイロットの訓練性なら、そのご武器の付いた各軍用機の専門訓練に移行。 確かこれ、NASAの宇宙船に乗り込む人用にも超音速練習機での一定時間の操縦が義務化されていたはずで、かつて日本人宇宙飛行士が言及していたはず。勿論、超音速練習機の前モデルを操縦してた話。

T7 for 🇨🇦

Just make sure the pilot isn’t accidental ejected halfway through a flight! Boeing? Yeah nah!

The P-51 was NOT a trainer aircraft.

It’s a nice touch they painted some of the plane red …… be easier to find when they fall off mid flight.

If a plane has no doors, then doors won't fall off.

O T38 sutilmente parece-se com o desenho aerodinâmico dos F5 Tiger. Há uma semelhança entre ambos os T38 e os F5 Tiger.

Oof... Boeing, aye?

Those new trainers are decidedly less sexy then the T-38. Yikes, that bulbous wind screen looks like SAAB designed it.

The F404is a descendant of the F-18Hoenet

T-7 is a major headache for USAF. Boeing has been doing wrong with this new aircraft. Production delayed twice already and this delay causes a lot of troubles within Air Force and Navy.

SAAB is a partner in tjis Aircraft

🇵🇷PUR*EEUU🇺🇸I Prefer Tom Cat F-14... Or maibe..F16 XL..??🙄👆nice one..

New Air Force jet train er. To replace older T-38s. And old t 6 trainer😊 Aircraft 😎👍😎

Boeing...oh great!

Every part designed, tested, and approved by the stockholder selected accountants

Did I see Boeing? Oops, big problem.