These robot voices are getting better, I almost didnt turn over because of it!!

@stevenbreach2561

3 жыл бұрын

I just watch the pictures,protects me from the bullshit

@radaraacf

3 жыл бұрын

Almost lol

@roxywolfdragon1767

3 жыл бұрын

Can they not find someone that can speak a script 😹.

@rockinwackyidk

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah but It's still shit

I work where these vehicles are made and judging by some of the comments I never realised we’re employing the wrong people to design and build ! There is so much expertise just going to waste with such bright ideas and improvements and the depth of knowledge is world class I shit you not 💩

@dickdastardly5534

3 жыл бұрын

@settle down Beavis hmmmm keyboard warriors and geniuses you got that right 👍🏻

@stevenbreach2561

3 жыл бұрын

Yes,WOT is a hidden hotbed of knowledge and experience

@boomerhgt

3 жыл бұрын

settle down Beavis Kids ain't watching videos like these, fully grown idiots you will find

@dickdastardly5534

3 жыл бұрын

@david faulds This was quoted in the Sun newspaper the bastion of quality truthful journalism ! I can say with with certainty its all a crock of shit sir

@Puzzoozoo

3 жыл бұрын

Didn't you know most of the worlds military experts comment on You Tube videos.😁

The UK technology is very professional.

@Pasdidentifiant00

2 жыл бұрын

ahahahahahahahah

I think the UK needs to invest in missile and rocket defence ti incoming attacks

@philmills4473

2 жыл бұрын

Nobody attacks UK with that tech, they use illegal migration propaganda and social media attacks (proxy war) Rape and murder the English Irish Scottish and Welsh by middle East and African nations.usually by by policies by people from that area which is more of a sleeper to cause harm infiltrate through stealth to begin with and now days they don't even bother to hide it anymore. Christ they even said white children deserved to e raped and they were innocent . Patel has conveniently used her am n colour to gain popularity with no success. Another racist or plant/bought off? Who knows but the cenotaph was also attacked plus our monarchy threatend regularly and politicians assainated. Most covered up by media which is highly suspicious Trevor mcdonald.

A vibrating nightmare by all accounts ....that the enemy will hear miles away

@zipz8423

2 жыл бұрын

The Ukrainians had better get some gum shields with the delivery.

@stevelong7187

Жыл бұрын

We should have bought CV90

Troops should be barred from riding in Ajax to save them needing joint replacement ops later in life. Brimstone is cool though.

The Ajax family of vehicles is actually pretty decent and the Brimstone is the best on the market, battle tested and far superior to anything else around. Yes, the Ajax is based on an older Spanish design, which is pretty decent to start with, but it's been improved on and putting the Brimstone on it is fantastic. I'm sure there will be people who will say "it's not a British designed vehicle" but to be honest, if you can take an already decent platform and evolve it into something that fits your own needs, who cares? Look at the Americans with the Harrier, they took an already excellent aircraft and tailored it to perfectly fit their Marine Corps. Everyone's a winner!!🇬🇧🇬🇧✌✌

@johnmartin6420

3 жыл бұрын

I could day the same thing about the AGM-114 Hellfire, went into service in 1984 combat tested since 1991. Hellfire foundation and inspiration for Brimstone. Recall Brimstone comes in only a Radar guided version, where as Hellfire comes in Semi Acrive Laser Seeker, MWR, and Imaging IR. Hellfires warheads are HEAT, Shaped Charge, Tandem Anti Armor, Thermobaric, Anti Personal Blast Fragmentation, but my favorite is the Flying Ninja Ginsu Guillotine Kinetic Warhead ( it dices, slices, chops and purees). And Hellfire also is the basis for the AGM-179 that will replaced the Hellfire in US Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. And I find nothing wrong with the ASCOD 2 Ajax/Pizarro/Ulan. It's a modern architecture, that will be produced well into the 30'a and 40's if its accepted into US Army service as the OMFV and the MPF tank, it will become the standard western IFV/MICV, that will likely we adopted by Canada likely some middle east countries.

@anthonywilson4873

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnmartin6420 US military along with others where seriously considering Brimstone. If it was down to their Military chiefs they would have used it, the politicians want a home grown weapon from their financial friends. The Brimstone was developed by the UK because the Hellfire did not do what it wanted. Here is an article on it: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brimstone_(missile)

@rosewhite---

3 жыл бұрын

@G P British Army is good at obsolescence. 10 year old Chinese planes being made into AEW patrol planes? Spend £8-9 billion on new Nimrods then scrapo them unflown? Our enemies and friends must think we are the most stupid people on Earth .

@gammonsandwich1756

3 жыл бұрын

@@rosewhite--- You never have a decent thing to say sbout this country. Seen you before. Makes me wonder what you're really attempting to do...

@rosewhite---

3 жыл бұрын

@@gammonsandwich1756 It's called pointing out truth.

I really like this uplifting music, like you're free with not a care in the world. "Look at the trees and the sun and the people you love. Now lets consider our latest vehicle, optimized for ripping people to shreds."

I think this would be better suited as a module for boxer

Lets put it to the test

There's an obvious reason for providing the AJAX Squadrons with this capability. Remember that AJAX is replacing SCIMITAR as the British Army's armoured reconnaissance capability. SCIMITAR, the recce variant within the CVR(T) family is a direct descendent of AJAX. AJAX, like CVR(T) is a family of vehicles providing different capabilities for a Recce or Deep Strike Squadron. Within the CVR(T) family, overwatch and anti-armour provision was delivered by the STRIKER variant. That vehicle was lost some years ago and provisionally replaced by dismounted JAVELIN teams working from SPARTAN. Having BRIMSTONE mounted on ARES would directly replace that need to have anti-armour overwatch for the forward scouting and screening AJAX recce troops. AJAX may have a powerful 40mm cannon, but it can't stop heavy armour.

I like how it says Ajax but then shows the BMP

@maksybretherton5624

Ай бұрын

This is not a bmp tho

@chewiesof

Ай бұрын

@@maksybretherton5624 0:21

Turned a decent IFV into one of the scariest tank killing weapons on the field

I hit military "Buzzword Bingo" twice in the first 70 seconds.

This weapon is also good for Britain the Great.Along with this The Great Britain has to develop a Hypersonic missile for own defense.

@zipz8423

2 жыл бұрын

We cant afford one of those.

I wonder if the Ajax could be developed into an amphibious assault vehicle?

Seems the time to field them is excessive. Tech advancements may preclude functionality. My buddy said a durable base and transformable weapon attachments.

It looks like a CVR(t) Striker that's had one too many pies!

@davidbell8320

3 жыл бұрын

Not wrong mate, it does not look nimble at all.

Is not Ajax a modification of Warrior? Also, warrior has been written off and that fancy turret with a better gun and fire control is no longer needed but I can see it here on Ajax. If the warrior program and IFV family was canceled, would Ajax be still fine?

@MFitz12

3 жыл бұрын

Ajax is a modification of ASCOD.

I have a question how will this missile system perform against Combat vehicles armed with Active Protection system

@aceofhearts573

2 жыл бұрын

Active protection systems have limited ammo for defense. You just have to use multiple missiles until the protection system ammo is exhausted.

@anthonywright6237

2 жыл бұрын

Don't really know do you.. I suppose you deal with the situation around you

@zipz8423

2 жыл бұрын

Just shoot it in the arse end because most protection systems are front facing.

I hope the words " low cost " doesn't come back to bite them.

Why was this filmed in 2fps?

Maybe if mounted on a successful working platform like CV90?

Brimstone Ajax was at West malling 1980

The brimstone knocks spots off the maverick. The yanks had a congressional committee asking they're generals why they didn't buy it lol

@fakename4507

3 жыл бұрын

that was painful. My brain hurts from trying to interpret your incorrect spelling. It's their, not they're

@carlkinsey8736

3 жыл бұрын

@@fakename4507 oh nooooooooo a grammar nazi! 😂

@1chish

3 жыл бұрын

@@fakename4507 No Stephen grammar Nazis like you are painful.

@eraldorh

3 жыл бұрын

The brimstone is superior to both the maverick and the hellfire.

Fancier version of the hedgehog on the Matilda then, fair one.

Impressive But is Brimstone powerful enough to provide an effective response in place of Indirect Mortar fire? Or is it primarily a anti Armour and precision guided weapon?

@deanwood1338

3 жыл бұрын

Anti armour on the move was what it was designed for and does it incredibly well

@anthonywilson4873

3 жыл бұрын

Mortar round is a lot cheaper and has it use for troops on the ground. Brimstone is for specific target. Saw a demonstration on range on KZread and it put a Brimstone no warhead through the cab of a crossing truck doing 70 mph. I should say that was the intended target.😀

@deanwood1338

3 жыл бұрын

@@anthonywilson4873 yeah they still have artillery and mortars for area suppression. Plus the m270 i believe is getting upgraded too. Brimstone from a typhoon or Apache perfect for anti armour

@danielgreen3715

3 жыл бұрын

@@anthonywilson4873 Definitely! ..with that kind of precision..a very potent munition Cheers for filling in the Gap for me

@danielgreen3715

3 жыл бұрын

@@adriankemble5870 yeahh probably by the time it has gone through all the Beaurocracy

Any experts on here that can tell me whatever happened to the 81mm Mort "Merlin" round project that was going to 'top attack' the waves of soviet armour ? Remember it being well publicised for a time, then . . .nothing ! Just wondering what happened to it, the concept seemed sound enough. TIA.

@reallyoldfatgit

3 жыл бұрын

As I recall it was a Royal Ordnance own project for which there was no British requirement. Basically they were able to prove the concept and wanted the MOD to fund future development but as there was no perceived need there was no further money and so it never happened.

@clivedunning4317

3 жыл бұрын

@@reallyoldfatgit Thanks, your reply only makes me wonder more ! I served with a REME officer who worked on the design stage of the project, he was quite enthusiastic about MERLIN and it was still being developed then (mid-80's). I'm puzzled now as to why a regular REME officer was working on the project, as he was a genuine guy, and wouldn't have made it up. Personally, I thought the concept was very original and worthy of development. Thank you for your reply, very much appreciated.

@reallyoldfatgit

3 жыл бұрын

@@clivedunning4317 I came across it in 1989/90 whilst completing technical training. We were visiting An RO facility where 81mm Mortar Bombs were filled and we received a presentation all about it. I remember being very impressed but surprised that it wasn’t being taken forward. We were told that it was because D Inf didn’t consider it to be necessary, I asserted that RO ought to finish it off and start manufacture as they would be able to sell it overseas. They stated that they didn’t have the funding to develop the manufacturing facilities, plant and machinery without guaranteed sales to the MOD. My view was that it was so good that they should be able to create a market for it and the MOD would end up buying it off the shelf. Later, of course, it transpired that D Inf did want it but had to make hard choices between various projects and didn’t have the money to take it forward. By D Inf I mean them and all the relevant Army/RM requirements staff.

@clivedunning4317

3 жыл бұрын

@@reallyoldfatgit Thanks for that detail, makes things far clearer in my mind, I really appreciate you going into all the detail. Question for you: do you think with the advancements in technology over last 40 years it would make it easier to produce today; or, have advances in armour technologies negated the efficacy of a 81mm, top attack, munition ? TIA.

@reallyoldfatgit

3 жыл бұрын

@@clivedunning4317 Eventually it all boils down to the warhead, from memory Merlin had a straight forward HEAT shaped charged warhead which would have been effective against the thinner top armour of Warsaw Pact tanks such as the T72. Guidance/homing was provided by the emerging digital technologies which, these days, could be very much more sophisticated, targeting specific vulnerable parts of the target and not just its centre of mass. So, though it might be possible to up-armour an older tank to counter it, and a modern tank might be a more challenging proposition all round, it should prove possible to produce a system which is reasonably in-expensive and pretty effective. However, the problem with HEAT warheads is that penetration is related to calibre and an 81mm mortar is just 81mm in diameter. However, against any other fighting vehicle I think a very effective system could be produced.

Pity it's as slow as an asmatic snail carrying some heavy shopping and so noisy that the enemy would hear them leaving the start line...lol

Russians: hee hee...we have a machine gun that can shoot straight through it.

why the bmp at the start

@stevetheduck1425

3 жыл бұрын

It's a sales drive toward the Polish Army (you see the same vehicle with Polish language info on the side of the Brimstone cassette late in the vid): use this new weapon on any old ex-Soviet vehicles you have. Cheap, effective and ironic.

It’s cool to flex this amazing new defence weapon but if u give out to much info Russia China North Korea could use this info and make there own of the same weapon we want better weapons and defence we need to keep it secret this does look good

@zipz8423

2 жыл бұрын

Wonder if these are going to Ukraine? I dont even know if this variant was manufactured in any numbers?

Brtimstone sounds like a tarted up Swingfire.

Launcher hold 4x missiles: doesn't seem much.

@user-zh5yl3ig3z

2 жыл бұрын

Would absolutely need to redirect lasers. In a few years the uav’s will be making these obsolete.

@BigDaddyButthead90

5 ай бұрын

X2 so 8 missiles

@Twirlyhead

5 ай бұрын

@@user-zh5yl3ig3z The swarming and guidance tech that these have could be a headstart in the next evolution of drones. The two technologies are not mutually exclusive. Here is a venn diagram 🤖

Low cost?

Me buy it all

now. build a platform on that chassis with a twin m163 Vulcan

I am torn! Brimstone is extremely capable! But you almost have the same capability if you slap a RCH155 on a Boxer. You can shoot laser guided munition far cheaper and on top do everything else that and artillery normally does! Anti Tank rockets should always be shot by the most low cost platform available. That is not anything tracked, that is not anything armored. Slap it on a Jeep!

They need some ability against T14, i'm not sure Challenger 3 quite does that you really dont want to see one, your better hitting it further out and this looks to do that as long as it can get target info from another vehicle

@europa1387

3 жыл бұрын

If it comes to it and the Russians have defeated us just launch the Tridents I say, at least it's a draw then and we go out with a bang. Britain cannot be invaded.

@SNOWDONTRYFAN

3 жыл бұрын

serious , are you talking about the may day parade cut out , the T14 2015 ? its now 2021 and people are still talking about a main battle tank that has never seen the light of day , as for its real world specs , get real the Russians always talk up those , when in fact they are all shiny objects , example their big bs about creating new look mechanised formations , similar the the UK/USA Concept on a family of fighting vehicles , it never happened , so when one talks of the Brimstone and any other anti tank/armour weapon it should compare it to what is actually on the front row of the Russian mechanised formation today

@mcgherkinstudios

3 жыл бұрын

I’d imagine this hiding behind a hill with a light recon UAV in the sky would be pretty unstoppable against a tank.

@dcanmore

3 жыл бұрын

there's only going to be 143 Challenger 3s and probably only for home defence, it will never see combat against T-14.

Can it destroy their Challenger 2 tank?

@WilliamEvans-kh1gj

11 ай бұрын

No

CVT was air portable this certainly will not be with all the pies it’s eaten.

2030 is the given date for the TOW replacement by the US Army. Since Brimstone is a development of the US Hellfire, I see a plan coming together here.

@64mickh

3 жыл бұрын

Except for outward appearance , the two are very different missiles, and Brimstone is highly unlikely to replace the TOW in US service, because of the “not built here” bias

@jameshammonds4687

3 жыл бұрын

Brimstone was originally meant to be a development of the hellfire but the hellfire simply didnt do what was needed so it was a completely new design and shares nothing at all with Hellfire.

@zipz8423

2 жыл бұрын

@@jameshammonds4687 They share the same motor and body dont they?

Mostly dangerous for its crew. Was it designed by a team of Chinese and Russians?

Future Heavy Brigade and Deep Recce...oh my...preparing to fight Zulus at Rorkes Drift and Rommel in the Western Desert are they!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Meanwhile out in the real world all potential enemies are equipping with mini drones carrying several small guided missiles and operated by kids trained on Nintendos! Each kid can score 4 tanks every flight! Britain is good at equipping with Ronsons.

@bluecollarcanuck

3 жыл бұрын

Sad. The Generals and political porkbarrelers are STILL trying to fight the LAST war. We STILL haven't learned a damn thing from the mistakes of Vietnam and the Iraq War. Ajax just looks like a redone Bradley, but with more missiles.

@thephoenix8722

3 жыл бұрын

Drones do have a future in war but they have there limits and weakness for example they cant stay in there air for ever and are limited to the ammo they can carry. Soldiers and tanks are still needed to hold the ground and take it and as an ex soldier id rather be in one of these than land rover if drones are flying about.

@rosewhite---

3 жыл бұрын

@@thephoenix8722 But the thing is that you have your head in the sands outside Tobruk or in the leafy bocage of Normandy. The potential enemies are mass producing these cheap drones like the one that took out 4 Armenians tanks in one sortie. A tanker in a Ronson is not a happy bunny. Britain needs lots of drones with the mini missiles and miniguns to hose enemy in trenches or trucks. None of yesterday's battles is a pointer to what tomorrow's will be.

@thephoenix8722

3 жыл бұрын

Like i said drones do have a future but the majority of the army today is design for anti terrorism and 3rd world policing. So having an armoured carried for soldiers is good. If war broke out between another super power doesnt matter if you have a million drones it be a stand off with nukes so investing heavily in drones for an encounter that will never get to that stage is a waist of money.

@rosewhite---

3 жыл бұрын

@@thephoenix8722 Meanwhile out in the real world the Azerbaijanis took out and APC hiding in a barn with a mini missile from a drone. Do squaddies burn well?

Just wondering why the video showed Russian BMPs at the beginning when talking about the equipment and not the threat🤔. Sometimes these videos are made up by people who don’t know their AFV recce🤨 As an ex Swingfire commander it looks quite good and I’m sure it can do the job it is designed for, but it’s no good giving it to the Tankies as if it hasn’t got a gun they aren’t interested in it; this was proven when they took over Swingfire from my lot the Royal Artillery. Give it to the Gunners who have a good and long history with guided weapons, Swingfire, Tracked and Towed Rapier, Blowpipe, Javelin and Starstreak👍

@64mickh

2 жыл бұрын

They were Polish BMPs who are to be a customer for vehicle mounted Brimstone.

Top secret 😂

Brimstone is well proven, just a shame Ajax is a tram smash.

Yep, with a bit of SAM cover these vehicles will be terrifying. Even more so if the missile is cheap enough for use against buildings etc.

@rosewhite---

3 жыл бұрын

This vehicle is as useless as those stupid little forage caps soldiers had to wear on side of head!

@_blitzterceptor_8648

3 жыл бұрын

@@rosewhite--- no

@rosewhite---

3 жыл бұрын

@@_blitzterceptor_8648 care to elaborate?

@_blitzterceptor_8648

3 жыл бұрын

@@rosewhite--- no

@Gaijin #Gaijin

It’d be a better idea to actually fix the major cockups they’ve still got first rather than create another excuse and by saying that look at what you’ll lose if you cancel me now

. According to the press it cannot go above 20mph, vibrates like mad, creates illness in crew members.

@Lastbus511

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah but its got brimstone that make it an icreaderbly lethal wheapon. I like it just for that alone.

Suitable against drones ???

@deanwood1338

3 жыл бұрын

If said drone was on the ground then yes, I airborne they would use a starstreak missile

@anthonywilson4873

3 жыл бұрын

We want miniature ack ack with proximity fuses. When is the first drone on drone air battle going to take place, maybe it already has. It will be like robot wars! Kamikaze drones.

@deanwood1338

3 жыл бұрын

@@anthonywilson4873 hahaha that’s true. I remember reading about devolving a cannon type system mounted on the Ajax platform too for drone and helicopters. Maybe using the ct40 cannon I am assuming

@rosewhite---

3 жыл бұрын

@@anthonywilson4873 kzread.info/dash/bejne/ep2HttilcrzeYZc.html

It didn't do much to the car target.

@stevetheduck1425

3 жыл бұрын

It has often been used to 'hit' rather than 'explode' a test target. It shows how accurate it is: once passing directly through the drivers' seat of a white pickup.

@melbeasley9762

3 жыл бұрын

@@stevetheduck1425 Fair enough.

,,бримстом,, похож на ,,хеллфаер,,

Who writes this marketing drivel. It seems good against pickups but......GDLSUK or General Dynamics US as it should be known.

@webtoedman

3 жыл бұрын

The impact videos are filmed with no explosive payload. This is to demonstrate the accuracy of the missile, which would not be easy to assess if it was enveloped in an explosion. The test facility used by BAE uses US Army surplus chevvy pickups as a standard accuracy targets. Terminal effects tests are often done on what appear to be concrete filled shipping containers.

How is the Ajax 1st in class, the Britts seem to call anything they make "World Beaters or 1st in Class. I would say the Puma, T-15, K41, Hanwa Redback AS21 and Namer have a leg up on the Ajax, all are newer platforms with better more powerful engines armour and crew protection ( T-15, K41 and Namer having active protection) then the Ajax, that is just an update of the 22 yr old ASCOD Pizarro/Ulan.

@hansmeyer7225

3 жыл бұрын

It’s a channel with a computer voice. Programmed somewhere in Asia to trigger post Brexit nationalism. It’s all about the money...

@adrianrichards247

3 жыл бұрын

@@hansmeyer7225 yea knock yourself out.

@VaucluseVanguard

3 жыл бұрын

John.... John......... mate.... really? It's best in class because Johnny Foreigner didn't deign it. Really what more do you need to know?

@johnmartin6420

3 жыл бұрын

@@VaucluseVanguard The 1st 100 Ajax will be made at General Dynamics Facility in Spain, then shipped to the UK for sub system and turret integration, the 2nd batch of 489 Ajax will be assembled in a former forklift factory in Pentrebach in South Wales, from hulls made in General Dynamics factory in spain from Swedish steel, same steel used to make the hulls of the CV-90 and Patria AMV. The engine is a german MTU 600 Kilowatt V8, attached to a German RENK 6 speed HSWL 256B transmission. Now contrast this with the Griffin ll that's offered for the US Armies MPF and Griffin lll thats going up against the Rheinmetall/Raytheon/Textron K41, BAE heavily upgraded New Gen Bradley, Oshkosh Hanwha AS21 for the OMFV. All 4 teams have said their vehicles will be made in the USA, using american Turrets, Weapons, Transmissions, Engines, Tracks, Suspensions and Subsystems.

@tomgoff7887

3 жыл бұрын

It's all designed to impress UK voters, usually while also quietly cutting the size of the British armed forces (and budget). So, yes, it's absolute rubbish but if it delivers a few extra votes to the current government that's all that matters. Defence companies aren't above issuing sycophantic press releases either.

The brimstone may prove to be a serious piece of kit but to put in a transport platform that causes sickness, disorientation, hearing loss is a bit of an own goal

Ajax looks like it’s had too much put on it another bad design by the MOD. Get the Germans new Lynx. 👍🏻

It's just a massive bunch of sales bollocks.

WAAAY too many @$#@!$ buzzwords.

This is the worst AFV ever.